because the. machine into life will be smeared. all over the you. know post someone. because of the old style if you wish to. publish is a list of us individuals including top officials from the ministration who would sanctions in response to american moves the day before. going to choose the type of democracy she leaves with the german parliament to. look throughout the nation. google misled users in australia about collecting. data through one of the country's federal courts. can find.

brigade is now an actual part of the british army. told to use inclusive language to avoid causing offense. coming your way in just a few moments time you'll be here in the studio in one hour to get up to speed on the morning global news headlines i want to get that. hello and welcome to cross talk where all things considered i'm peter lavelle western governments and western media portray the tensions within ukraine as a conflict involving russia and ukraine this is false there is a road map to resolve ukraine's and turn. right and it's called the minsk accords

russia is not the problem but nato expansion is. cross-talk in ukraine i'm joined by my guest paul robinson an auto he is a professor in the graduate school of public and international affairs at the university of ottawa in chicago we have because if he is a 19 nato analyst and contributor to antiwar dot com and in budapest we cross the board said you only he has a podcast at the gaggle which can be found on youtube and rumble all right gentlemen cross in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i always appreciate rick let me go to you 1st in chicago 1st of all i want to compliment you on your amazing work at antiwar dot com i think you are a very important voice and resource for people really want to understand what's going on in ukraine and you do it exemplary work there so you know one of the things that really irritates me in looking at western media coverage of what's

going on in ukraine is that they frame it as a conflict between russia and ukraine which is not the case here and and president putin made that very clear in the readout that we got from the white house with the president spoke to each other so talk about how it's being misframed this conflict go ahead rick. it's an honor to be on your show with paul and george in addition to yourself 1st of all thanks it's you know it's very clear the narrative is in many ways goes back over a century you know the kind of russophobia that began in 1917 but did not disappear with the end of the cold war and with the dissolution of the soviet union as a matter of fact what we're seeing is an intensification and i'll connect this directly with the ukrainian situation in a moment but what we've witnessed in the united states over the last 5 years and i don't know how many foreign viewers realize the full depth of the you know the russian anti russian hysteria and so forth that permeated the media in this country

to you know right down to the granular level where if you go to any news site and read the comments sections of particularly on you tube the story have anything to do with russia you'll see not only dozens and scores but quite literally hundreds of statements in a row just reeking of you know venomous russophobia and this is been consciously called debated for 5 years and it's not something then you can just put aside after after that sort of thing as a matter of fact i would argue these are the the ukraine crisis or conflict now that the people voted for george by you know the democratic party core constituents would have felt betrayed if he had not been confrontational with russia after beating the drum of russophobia for 5 years so what they've done is constructed a false narrative where the people of crimea voting as you know they want autonomous region within even post soviet ukraine they certainly have the right to vote to succeed from ukraine and affiliated with russia if they chose and similarly in lugansk and donetsk these people clearly rejected the 2014 coup

and in many cases you know neo nazi tinge to you know who came into power at that time as was their right now to somehow portray that as russian aggression is an inversion of the truth you know you have paul that put it just perfectly there because if you if you watch c.n.n. an m s n b c even fox news it the. pending conflict between ukraine and russia and that is that's not framing it correctly as i said in my introduction there is a roadmap out there and it's not mentioned in the media once and i look at it and i watch media very very closely not probably as closely as rick does but from the western perspective this is not even mentioned and if it were implemented it would resolve the internal conflict in ukraine and that's what it is it's an internal conflict go ahead paul. well this is what we were. political scientists would call it internationalize civil war say it's civil war it's war being fought between

ukrainians but it's one of which foreign powers including russian federation have got involved so i don't i don't think i can one can say because russians are not party to this in in any way shape or form because that's a clear also not entirely true but yes you're right there are the ms cream and switch was signed in february of 2015 ask ukrainian army was defeated in the battle of the bouts of. agreements really were pretty much forced on ukraine against its world due to a military defeat and as soon as it was able to recover a little bit it pretty much made it clear that it had no intention of fulfilling them the key elements obviously and so are ceasefire and then the giving to the regions of lugansk and dining out some form of special status within ukraine and effectively giving them some form of local autonomy and then also an amnesty for anybody involved in the rebellion now the ukrainian government has made

it very clear that it has no intention of giving special status. or of giving an amnesty and as a result really everything has pretty much ground to a halt now the problem is that if you crane is serious about wanting to get its last territories back it's very hard to see how it could do it other than by offering them or tanami and an amnesty because the rebel forces simply not not agreed to do anything that's and i'm sure they would not even want to agree to that but russian federation might be able to to squeeze their arms but they did anything that's for not is impossible and certainly russian government will not squeeze our arms to accept anything less than that which means are pretty much the an impasse because not a side can win militarily on of us the diplomatic route is garden but the military . it has gone too and as a result everything is kind of stuck you know ok good curate you know what i find really fascinating is the the again going back to the framing of the united states

and nato is about to defend the sovereignty of ukraine but if you look at the reality is that it's the united states that is compromised ukraine's sovereignty. by pushing for nato membership here i mean if you know victoria nuland is is that it's the godmother of the new ukraine without crimea and the donbass it's because of that it's nothing what russia had to do russia didn't know were told the government in 2014 george. though that's exactly right i mean the united states is interested in ukraine for one reason only it wants ukraine in nature that is being the goal since the end of the soviet union and the dissolution of the warsaw pact because if you look at the map pretty much every country that is west of russia has not been scooped up within nato i mean other than serbia and bosnia herzegovina everybody else is now in. military alliance russia ukraine

is the standout and this is the united states is go so really the americans don't care very much about ukraine other than as a dagger to direct at russia so that's why the americans have been rather. encouraging the ukrainians egging them on maybe it's a mountain of bend and be written thinking that well either way to go is whether ukraine wins in and pushes back on the breakaway provinces or ukraine losers and russia was to intervene it's a win win for united states and nato because then ukraine could be just. you know be a great great. russia it hasn't worked out that way for a variety of reasons and i think now and talk about this later. the united states

is really was that we have to be seen. with its role or at least their rejection of the plan to send a warship. you know rick it's kind of an eerie. memory of august 2008 i mean. you know trying is getting these signals from nato heads and and western governments we have to point out that the germans and french have basically said you know deescalate but you know up until the day the telephone call between biden and putin you know the rhetoric was pretty bombastic here but do we address members that you know saakashvili miscalculated is he going to do exactly the same thing because the result could be the same defeat go ahead rick. yeah the parallel is astonishing a race at the nato summit in bucharest romania in 2008 georgia and ukraine which have been pared by nato is 2 countries that will enter at the same time and they were promised a full nato membership assuming they met nato preconditions for for that

incorporation the 2 obstacles at that time and not go between for georgia and ukraine to enter nato as full members are on resolve territorial disputes on their on their soil and the presence of foreign military personnel on their territory in the case of 2008 with me on south though said you had small contingents of russian peacekeepers mandated by the commonwealth of independent states by the way and those 2 areas refused to be part of a post soviet georgia particularly one ruled by mikhail saakashvili what he attempted to do in 2008 was to knock both those obstacles out at the same time by re incorporating up cars in south ossetia even getting the russian peacekeepers and then making himself nato ready i would argue that selenski is preparing to do precisely the same thing as a matter of fact he's quoted in the ukrainian news today as is is pushing the membership action plan you know the final step before for nato membership as a matter of fact i should mention the ukrainian press today also quotes the

ukrainian ambassador to germany saying it's either nato or nuclear weapons i'm not paraphrasing i'm quoting he says either nato gives us membership action program we enter the alliance or we may be forced to redo the nuclear option that's a quote from the ukrainian ambassador to germany so i mean this is i understand rhetoric it's not playing out but it's clearly i think a situation in analogy exactly the one you've established peter which is ukraine sees it's the necessity of resolving those 2 issues i mentioned as preconditions for joining nato and they seem to be hell bent on joining nato and nato is no less committed to you know put. for ukraine's further incorporation ok well you know paul there's one real big wrinkle which and it's not a comparison to georgia in the last 40 seconds here. crimea is part of russia and it is now it will forever be and if someone nato ukraine want to try to change that

back on the ground it's called war go ahead paul well yes i mean there's no way of a crimea. is going to return to. the ukraine. society different. circumstance but i would cite just 3 but the ukrainian government is likely to to launch a full ask france if we've we've seen the head of ukrainian army on several occasions in the past couple months admit that any attempt to do this would involve massive civilian casualties so so they do actually seem to be aware that you know that they can't do this very easily without killing huge numbers of people but of course when they do so that will prompt a russian intervention so i think that's sort of what. their poll that we're going to go to a hard break and after that hard break we'll continue our discussion on ukraine tensions stay with arkie.

what's needed national will discover that i want anybody to molest me that's only sid it was a propagandist you all said it's kind of the regular morgue you're more your partner do we provide. water source like you would all but us lucifer mistletoe is just that i'm like i don't i'm just failed nobody it is not my achievement mr davies are 5 you have plans for conceit. and carried out by the people themselves if alan would produce or even floor kit with the idea of making a film like this they'd probably be branded as crazy. that was the sentiment during the war the soviets were brave heroes resisting the nazis that's going to change of

course after the war but once the cold war begins. little people think that hollywood is a free place but really what is strictly defined by only one side of the business and the other side is ideology. how would i define hollywood is a call to dream manufacture which i think's true but i think equally it's a propaganda fact. the world is driven by a dream shaped by one person. who

dares thinks. we dare to ask. welcome back to crossfire where all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing ukraine tensions. ok let's go back to paul in our way bright before we go to the break we're talking about the huge wrinkle called crimea now as we point out on this program repeatedly the status of the donbass is different than crimea because a donbass is within ukraine russia recognizes it it's part of ukraine but not crimea that's a totally different fact on the ground continue i'll finish your answer go ahead yeah absolutely so there is a danger of course that is that has been said that the ukraine but would try and reincorporate. through force following the georgian example or more successful

example of azerbaijan recently in recapturing its lost territories by force but the problem here is that in a dumbass of a urban environment and that there's simply no way that ukrainian army could attempt to be recaptured without destroying large parts of large cities and killing very large number of civilians in the process and ukrainian leadership doesn't actually seem to be aware of this and that is going to serve as something as a restraint on them because such you know such a level of destruction would almost inevitably bring in the russian army and and if the russian army weren't to intervene i think ukrainian army would be destroyed in short measure and i think these russian troop movements which people have been complaining about recently as if they were sort of the. you know indicating a russian invasion of ukraine weren't really designed to invade ukraine what they were designed to do was to send

a signal to kiev that you know if you attack don't bow. we will intervene and destroy you and i think that's really what's going on so is this form of terror you know. george i want to go to you but i want to ask rick a real quick question here rick how many citizens in the donbass have a russian passport now i think you've written about it you have the number. actually i don't i wish i did. as they are but whatever number of whichever percentage of the citizens and both were dancing and donuts do these are russian nationals that's right as i was that you know the follow up and the follow up on paul's point i guess russia would be obligated to defend their nationals if they were being assaulted and killed ok that was the point i wanted to make thank you i could but i don't know the percentage ok i believe it's around $500000.00 yeah and george what are you going to. inform our audience i'm getting i'm so frustrated that you know facts are not being presented to western public why are the people of

the donbass wanting a russian passport how does can treat them how they've been treated over ever since 2014 go ahead george. exactly your paper is the crucial point they've been ball they've been terrorized they've been the subject of a massive military onslaught. they've been sanctioned they've been boycotted i mean you know it then life has been miserable by is essentially a war that is being waged against them by here now. the russians clearly took kiev's threats seriously so the fact that they did indeed. move their forces in such a massive way to the ukraine border meant that they actually took it seriously into what was ill and he was doing so whether it's the lansky whether it's the only guys with these the military whoever was behind it or whether it was the americans who were egging on the landscape the russians took it sufficiently seriously that they

they actually moved massive numbers of forces to the border and have said explicitly that this is not just oh wait you know casual military maneuvers long planned in advance they said we are responding to aggressive moves by nato this is said. that we moved off course of the ball that in response to aggression by nato so this was a serious business and now i think heads of prevail now what exactly happened whether it was the intervention of macro markel whether. the white house sudden you realize what what you know they've really bitten off more than they can chew but there seems to be an attempt to walk things back i think that probably explains why so that biden initiated that bizarre phone call with yeah. and this decision not to send the warships of the black sea because that was

a very dangerous that was and you know i think they realize in the white house that it's an explosive situation given the tension now in ukraine to send it was ships in the black sea where the russians are also carrying out military maneuvers in the black sea so at the moment it does look as if. cooler heads have prevailed but you know one never really learns one political about the pollen otto i mean i'm very perplexed by this i mean i think george is absolutely right and he suddenly realized maybe somebody in the room said hey that might be too provocative going into the black sea i mean i don't understand what's going on here are these serious people i mean. the readout and in the readout from the kremlin in the readout from the white house they were there they differ in many different ways here but if you look at the readout from the russian side they're just damn serious you know you this is escalation that we do not find acceptable on top of it there is a roadmap that initially at least the kiev government agreed to those are the

parameters and then they've walked this back it's quite humiliating and was it blinking you know he went from a to this i mean what is this guy going to resign because the biggest criticism of trouble is that we're no adults around i don't want these adults around blinken because they're the b. team from the obama administration so are these serious people paul. i think u.s. policy towards russia has revealed itself in last couple days to be rather chaotic because 1st you have there's call from biden to putin in which he talked about going to be u.s. talked about normalizing relations and also offering to have a summit and then today we get news of more u.s. sanctions against russia and the expulsion of 10 russian diplomats. which is strongly contradiction you can't on one day once when you can but it's it doesn't

make a lot of sense on one day to talk about normalizing biafra lotions and the next days that spell diplomats answer slap on sanctions which of course will never have the. moscow to consider but the initial olive branch was not done and in fact. i suspect right now no evidence 1st obviously this is speculation you know with those different people and pushing some different agendas in the white house and a lot on the ship by biden who's doing the one thing then the other so he passed 40 got a bit too far in ukraine pedaled back but forgot that he was going to put sanctions on the next day or something and i don't know anyway it was not a coherent policy yeah i mean the recovery maybe you can explain it to me in our audience here so out there in the call let's get together a tab a summit a one on one and the next day they sanctioned russian officials i mean what is going on here and if there were a meeting what in the world would they talk about

a repeat of anchorage go ahead. i think expressions like cat and mouse and good cop bad cop come to mind. biden can say whatever he chooses to but he has actions speak. louder than his words or his putative words you know i should mention a couple things real quickly though an allusion was made earlier to the men's talks i don't know how many people are aware of the fact but ukraine ukraine is suspended its participation in the trilateral group contact group so called mince talks stating that because they're being there they have been held in the capital below reuss in belarus as politically too close to russia that they refuse to continue those talks in that should be the head of the head of the delegation by the way the ukrainian delegation is limited crowd truck who is the 1st president of independent ukraine he's quoted yesterday as warning the russia of world war 3 is here it's of

world war 3 and again this could be heated rhetoric this can be i personally but the fact that language like this is used and is not refuted you know nobody in the state department dressed him down for using terms like that for example on the question of the 10 diplomats being expelled i read this morning 8 of them are being expelled specifically over russia's reincorporation of crimea. as you know this is not the summit yes some of the other sanctions are as a result of the russians alleged. interference in the presidential election last year and you know again you cannot build up in the public mind of the public as subconscious you know such a visceral suspicion and hysteria and hatred without it having a very real political consequence incident i read today on tasks that a poll was conducted in russia were 54 percent of russian citizens believe that the in american election last year was not fair so you know 2 can play this game and do it and we can hold up to the world. you know there's this little democracy as the

u.s. house has been referred to recently you know that i would imagine you know probably a comfortable or. similar amount of americans don't believe last election was very vulgar well that's a that's a totally different about would want to talk about here george you know you know consider what we've just heard on this program here i think it's very interesting look how because you want to explain expand nato you don't care about the ukrainian people but you empower people within ukraine talking about either it's nato or it's war ok 1st of all it's insanity because they're the biggest losers if something like that were to happen and it shows how the the atlanticist of the loud basically what i would say troublemakers beginning to push forward a membership would you want someone in a club like that go ahead george it's a good idea or it's a very good point there was a recent article i think you sent to me by anatol lieven who say something like

well made it was great when he didn't do anything right now nato is doing something it's not so great anymore but nato has to do something because it can't justify its existence other than inventing new missions for its so expansion of nato is part and parcel of nato is actually going on existing when there's not the slightest justification for it and of course by expanding it actually expanding the range of instability i mean it's causing great instability in ukraine we saw the instability it caused in georgia which are referred to i mean leave aside everything else like what happened in north africa with libya but what's what's happening now is that by continually banging the drum that ukraine must be integrated within the euro atlantic institutions it's of course fueling the

the plan to assist the westernised as the russell. of ukraine to keep pushing forward and in the hope that if they can provoke big enough crisis nato will be forced to come to their assistance so it's a very dangerous game nato is playing because it is encouraging those who want to provoke a war with russia you know that the sad thing is as i close up the program here this is what happens when you have the russia gate hoax bleed into policy it makes you tie yourself up like a pretzel ok that's all the time we have i want to thank my guests in chicago auto way and in budapest and i want to thank our viewers for watching us here darkie see you next time and remember. psychiatric drugs are essential for millions of patients rather they want that pill

that they hope will take care of their problem thoroughly and rapidly in the short term they really work the problem is in the long term and mostly disastrous suddenly stopping a drug can cause withdrawal symptoms more serious than the condition it was meant to treat instead of the beneficial effects of these different medicines ending up to something wonderful very often their form for a fix it up to something terrible can bill solve all ills we trying to medicate life itself i just think i was in like i was just scared i was a scared little girl i was 24 and like. i didn't have to be so complicated.

a lot of liberals think that hollywood is a very. loyal what is actually defined. in the business and in the other side is a. new brand or more morning you know mary and. going to bring your money. ali would is both a place and an idea has got the movie studios to get you know a bit of a gap in his 2nd history sometimes as we know it also places where there's a lot of propaganda. or whatever part of the the u.n. to.