please please please.

leave in a world where industry doesn't want any regulation they just want to put the products on the market. and. we need a regulation so we don't do. crazy things because maybe sometimes we would do crazy things i don't know but i'll accept that we have regulation we want to regulation i was industry. and if you don't behave then yes penalties that's why i. always say that the industry makes money of course it does if the industry did not make money how many people would be out of work. or sort of the last concern the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedent corporate interests corporate profits have been getting priority with the regulator so that needs to change and. and the big ways to do

that is just to require transparency. we respect we'd love transparency we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed in the us if we don't keer there's intellectual property rights but we are if so we publish everything's it would just be breaking the law. they prefer intellectual property. to the council children. if you make money out of selling pesticides how much incentive. does these companies do these companies have to get us off pesticides will they make sure that we get to use less pesticides or will they make sure that we use always more pests. to the industry

prefers to spend millions of euros in the lobbying to delay regulations instead of researching substitutes and how to make these things differently. quite frankly i've been in the industry for a long time i have never seen a brown envelope if that's what you're leading to absolutely never. you know the industry it's in the industry's interest to bring food to the tables that is safe at this high quality. that is reasonably priced so that you and i and all of those people working in food industry can also sit down and eat good nutritious food epitaphs are making the price. goals risk you are referring to are 2 accidents industrial incidents where it's either so or people who are injured or. people die every time this happens for industry in

general it's a defeat. however those incidents also allow us to improve to do it better next time and to progress and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus going from. what is progress in this progress moving forward whatever and using any technology we are capable of inventing but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful and that it's good for for the people we put some intelligence on what the technology and what progress is i don't think that progress is ruining the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that that can that can create disease and if cancer. to someone who's 20 years old that's the worst.

if we were to there was a progression or principle probably would not have airplanes would not exist because airplanes. sometimes they fall down so there is

a risk we would not have automobiles because every year in europe $56000.00 people die with little more. precautionary principle the thing is a disaster. and yet we are no more and more. and you will place these 2 other culture we are forming in europe. north americans or so as americans. you know seats because we don't use those we don't. i mean it doesn't make sense we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and in europe we have this romantic idea of this. business people. they will never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never

cultivate something they don't need just business people and we should get them to the business. and we can't expect them to act in any other way except as businesses. the only way that would say is if there is a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat. like a global commodity. we have a very big problem. and part of that problem is that food will go to the highest bidder and the highest bidder may. not be someone that wants to feed the highest bidder maybe someone

wants to feed your car this is entirely the wrong way to look at food food should be food. i would be. all about making money. making profits it's about because. it's about an informative. big uniform lannes with one group action. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also economically it's about international markets import export it's all about

companies controlling involve way places lands to export commodities is not about food production it's not about feeding people. industrial agriculture is a form of mining. and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and the most of the uses go into animal food and textiles fiber fuel whatever you have the rest of it can't be sold more expensive to some other use will go into processed in food processing.

that's always food a business transaction food is both yes so we all need to eat that's for sure but in europe we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a famine in europe hundreds of years so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between wanting to malta and the tomato we have tend to want your doesn't really matter to us if we have a chance. and i think we are. unaware of the impact of decisions here on countries where there is no food no where dazed is a big confusion between. general interest in the interest of industry because the priorities jobs and growth and growth and jobs more equal to people's lives. if the so food industry is successful it will create more jobs it will create more

value added it will create more protests so i don't see why we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry but this should be a communal fight. modern i recall sure relies on site there are it's relies on precision farming which is a connection between such a digital machinery and all the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production in agriculture because of overly. conservative restrictive regulation and these tradeoffs between progress and risk is not what i understood in.

i think europe is a base potential to be easy leading i would go to all region in the world we should be the ones with the best jobs and the most the best seeds you know hybridisation genetics base you cited scheme equals machinery we should be because we have every scene we need to succeed and my fear is that we are not using this potential to its maximum. label off promise to be competitive the best of the trade relations with all these countries the better it is i mean otherwise we stay like a fortress and we don't let anything in that doesn't let something out and you know this is not the world is not like that everything is connected neither thing is global so what we want to see is something very different is a model built on diversity on biological diversity that is you know different crops

planted together. i think it was a bit like it's a moot issue do. you wish that the 1st one you looked up and you wanted to go forward. with the others. that shows you just want to do it because. you think if it was national level off. the top of. that but if you talk a little. bit some of those are from difficult for. these critics one of the least most of them did in your belief because the. machine you don't want. the smear. you.

pull someone. because it looks like you really easy. do we get as humanity our act together to change and reconfigure it together how we operate on this planet. we will make ourselves obsolete. that's a defining moment and we have to put the technologies in place where they belong they have to be then assistant to golds while many people if i say that would say yes yes of course makes sense but. i have not understood that this is not where we

are now we are now defining future visions through technology. but i want to turn it around i want to have a collective vision where we want to be in how we want to design our environment our now our food system that operates within the planetary boundary is . in defining where it respects the rules of the planet. and not. we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms. continuous improvement of existing things because i have the. let's call it the old

continent. slowing down a little bit in making progress. if decisions are taking on emotion one day left the other day right this is not the basis of a sustainable farming want to progress do we want are we willing to trade. benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world. which is more mortal. so we are pecans to. other parts of the world which do not always play with the same rules. while living in a very strange place today because we have on the one hand challenges of obesity and overweight and on the other hand we have challenges of under-nutrition now nutrition and starvation. there are geopolitical issues and parts of the

world where there is less food and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world either through age or through producing it themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land because we can't use more land we can't use more resources. nor can say you know the woman don't. discipline the camaro therefore the muscles are really sick you may go to me come in the. mill is that.

the. problem i would want but a $1000000000.00 in medical. what do you imagine the number of chronic diseases that are in every family today. it is no due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found. and in all breast cancer friends that's not true so it is due to environment and to croly poisons that outnumber men walk down a crawling always means designed to be toxic initially and spread all over the place. first it's.

going to you're going to do it because his mom i don't want and i'm quoting dissident do you try new kid in young enough mama of unity national medical know what i said in my life. is credited to the dishonor community. inflow model you may trust us he could. talk among. to understand either. this is the database to go through and so to docs of course. they don't know that most in there are. usually boost your father must stay with.

the lesson but it. is listed in the got out of the navy. is not the biggest however. any of. them in your. local call me a very speedy baby. wish that bottle of gin is a control more people cross that us for stuff yes. this is so toxic us but a lot of it provokes your own bite out. 30 minutes i stuck a number of suspect chips yes to set i will up by then by subject us on the no the thing you know i cannot put on you leave me demasi mother she'll feel to you it will give us a bit on the north going on you wouldn't be out you know where we are no. no billy not get your noodle does he man i can see though listening to thomas and

instead of into you knew by see it today i would look at them out into a little bit in a moment although. dreaming. last team up to take. it up i mean to tell you a comedian i see a scene for you go look at the net but only because he will see about a lot to get him in the. morning and must be able to give you a hit a low and salalah he did the motherly 2 weeks and they must feel today are going to get along. and be fitted into maida. document.

isn't it. but it can only cut it. as a limited cover. he got to see good looking do you want to pursue annoyed got to the media no one here but go to the opera toggle as short a shield or. my daughter she's a little plastic all my lot or she will be locked in a what if you only know how thin they can put up but if not i will call not a lawsuit out there or the role model see if you know the in the media. so all these chemical compounds are out made out of petroleum petroleum is of

course feel fuel very sticky and it is by our cumulated because it's a 4 side compound which lasts long. this is why it gives the city the livers and include means and cancer because it gives of disease that are the destruction of communication the new cancer of the 1st reason you have cancer is because your south cannot communicate to each other anymore with and the rest of the body. and the common all diseases it's the same problem never has diseases like parkinson's i mean or or even depression it's the same problem also immune disease or all other malformations in the baby's it's all feels the same problems

a cell cannot communicate but this happens on the long term so that means several years several dozens of yours so you cannot see because you drink a glass of wine with bestie sides or a piece of bread with base the side you cannot see this effect immediately many of us your born and to modern agriculture have understood that it's easy to scare people it's easy to to use fear as a strong. emotional driver for a general policy and for influencing policy sometimes it's in the interests of the anti industry groups to do that of course because achatz their network brings in money for them as well so i think we should look at this from both sides we sometimes have visits from them recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and through manure and threatening letters and stuff but ok

that's part of the game i suppose we do not we you know when we fight against and we fight against when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons i sometimes have the feeling that. we have both in arrows and they have atom bombs as soon as there's an engineer or group of people who are against something maybe maybe the bandits maybe they stop using it in place of importing so in terms of development and trust i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth we know what's in our products for example that if i if i make a product i mean you can go home this evening and make a buy in your kitchen and you know what's in ringback there and you write it down that is the truth sorry but you know we are an industry we know we're pushing our products we can tell you this is the truth this is what we're putting across in our products when i say we have to truth i'm talking about our not talking about philosophically the truth i'm talking about what we do we know what we do and we

can talk about it. on the. compound we cover you don't know demand delivery assume visit something the seed of this was. really hot. if you've read the book listen to scale down it was warm in those here back to normal acres. this evaluate show me and leisurely do see this industry at. the new for example of principal place to see do more on the hard way downtown a glass on the route with money via an outward only rendition of go under. the bow see mustn't talk if you reduce you may like opposition group or the.

new or not who don't recall doing some on the immunity set cache they present. the last in the. bit hard particularly. in this city before such a mess on the part could you rephrase that searching for the. compositional satirically decided kelly be toxic even they collaborated on a new one on a very console look before that in social one took seek you on that they. don't that they are ugly for that on the make out is off you need listen and he's the sound is an emo. local now i'm puerto rico feed us here it is official a south a coffee down c.l. paul a community a chance if he. also met 2 more solo. who

can. say. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy confrontation let it be an arms race. spearing dramatic developments only going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful. if you sit down and talk. what's needed national will discover that already been able to muster that solicit it. from the regular morgue for your car.

wash ashore strike you all but us lucifer mr delicious fatima just. is not my achievement mr davies our 5 year plans were conceived. and carried out by the people themselves if they would produce or even flirted with the idea of making a film like this probably be branded as crazy. that was the sentiment during the war the soviets were brave heroes resisting. that's going to change of course after the war but once the cold war begins. people think that hollywood is a free place but really what is strictly. the business and the other side is. on holiday is

a call to dream anything. which i think's true. i think equally it's a problem in the fact. the. united states is not looking to kick off a cycle of escalation in conflict with russia moscow slaps the u.s. with sanctions. for washington imposing restrictions on russia just a bit in the week. a week in the u.s. state of minnesota over the police killing. continues to rage. a c.n.n. .