nato in america was controlling the european army. we are from making some, a military exercise with ally, great british people with germany in fight. you know, your friend army are no chance to, to, to, to happen one day because the, the guy we met the european army was shown the night and he met him. i met europe. but after all, the people want to make your european army, this them to see was not put on. you can see with hitler, the old thing. so i think europe union is the broken dream. i like europe. but that way, i think it's a violation of our dreams on a violation of our right little right. the thought felipe deval attorney at law from the french capital life, an rti international. thank you philip. thank you very much. just after half past 9

at night here in moscow, is there a news wrap up for now, but don't straight to for us more great programs get going very, very shortly. and the so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have is crazy. plantation, let it be an arms race is on often very dramatic development. only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, a very critical time. time to sit down and talk the greetings and salutations. welcome one and all. yes, my friends,

it feels who feels really good to be back on your television and mo bile screens and boil boil boy, look at all the fun frolic may hammond devastation. i've come back to israel versus palestine. republicans versus democrats. democrats versus progressive is rich versus poor. man versus earth from birth vs as well. basic reality. how we look around the world. we got chemical fires on cargo ships officer longer we got president joe biden promising over $750000000000.00 to the u. s. war machine . and unicef is now reporting that across the world, about 1000000000 children are multi dimensionally poor, meaning they lack necessities as basic as nutrition or clean water. but despite a world on fire, apparently the real victims in this world are the poor huddled

on born masses. no, i'm, i'm not talking about the debate over abortion and roe v wade. no, i'm talking about this article from bloomberg business week, sporting this rather incredible headline asking us to quote, spare a thought for the billions of people who will never exist. yes, peter coy, the economics editor for bloomberg business week is now apparently asking us to consider and more in the plight of human beings who are never ever going to actually be with human beings. in the article coil lament, billions of children are never conceived. how real is the loss of a life that never began? is the re right to exist? is there an ideal size of the world population? these related questions become more pressing as population growth flows. and while

the article goes on and on, delving into the deep philosophical battle over how many people should exist at any given moment, it's that last line that i quoted that kind of gives away the gag world, population growth flows. and that my friends is the rub you see is birth rates decline and more and more of my millennial gen and gen the brothers and sisters say, hell, no, we won't pro create that's got the world, the lead, who they're nervous. no new people means no new indentured servants to their economic slavery games because of the new york times reports quote, the strain of longer lives and low fertility leading to fewer workers. and more retirees threatens to up and how societies are organized. because right now, they're organized around the notion that a surplus of young people will drive economies and help pay for the old who boy. but if there's, you know,

if there's no new young people that means no one there to pay for the old. and that means my friends, it is time to start watching the hawks. if you want to know what's going on a city and you want to rush, well, let me show you what we always. the roy throw strikes, math grade was the place they make the steps manipulate, so math, put these weapons. so hope you're welcome. everybody watching the hark. i am dire. oh, ventura, i'm myisha cross. yes. back again. back again. hell. be home fro, create the dryer. the resounding cry from the millennials and gens ears, at least that's what they're accused of. i mean, i think that there is a really good point to be made. there is one of those millennials. there is no real point in doing it right now. i don't think that telling people that they need to

have kids to replace an aging workforce. it's going to get people to have kids who currently their work poor, what workplace instability. there is not enough work from home option. a lot of people are going to have to go back to work within short order, you know, after, because of the cobra restrictions being with it, there is not enough plots for daycare, they cares extremely expensive, child care is expensive. in general. there is no real benefit, it just makes the burden a lot harder for women specifically because this workforce was designed for men. it was not designed for mothers. so i think that it becomes a lot harder for individuals to decide. now is the time to do it when we live in a world where being a working mom is extremely difficult and this is driving, this is driving, you know, for lack of a better term. this is driving the leads crazy. it's driving the money men crazy. that's why you're seeing articles like different bloomberg because it's like, whoa, wait a minute. we are based on the entire idea. all of our economics, all of our societies, based on this idea of the baby boom generation where there's always going to be

a big influx of kids. but now around the world, you're seeing birth rates going down and in new york times and put it back in may that the era of high fertility is ending as women of gain more access to education and contraception and as being varieties. as you mentioned, the association associated with having children continue to attend to buy more parents are delaying pregnancy. if you are, babies are being born. the times even goes on to say that historically high birth rates and rapid growth and countries like, you know, you see like mexico and india where you always say ok, rapid birth rates, they're now seeing birth rates falling below the replacement rates of $2.00. kids, the family, the whole world is seeing this fall. it's pretty incredible when you, when you see it as a speech, when you think about it in terms of a species, i don't think that anyone saw it. they should have, but i don't think that most nation thought come in, especially in the developed world. because the idea was that women are always going to want to be mom, and i think that is been pushed for so long that that is what makes you a woman that is a part of who you are. that is a part of your contribution to society. so to see women take it into their own

hands to basically control their bodies and say, hey, i'm pursuing higher education, i'm pursuing roles in employment sectors. i am being an entrepreneurial leader, all of these things. but in addition to that, we have to recognize the burden of wonderful as children can be. the cost associated with them is a burden. the fact that women still don't have paid leave, but back maternity leave. it's hard to get in many places. these things are kind of snowballing into the decisions where the thing a lot of younger women make today. well, and you know, i go back a while back when, when paul ryan was with us. how speaker paul ryan, who you know, he warned this of this before where he rode off into the wisconsin wilderness, declaring that this is going to be the new economic challenge for america. people, baby boomers are retiring, i did my part. he had like 5 kids, but we need to have higher birth rates in this country in order to pay for taxes, basically buying it up. but that really bothers me on a many, many, many, many levels of attitude. so what like a woman supposed to like to lie down and just produce for her country like a lady,

lay down and have some kids for the guys because we need better. we need more tax money. that's not going to be right. you know, i mean that's a, that's really discovery. it's a little hand made sale like have more kids, you know, plus, there's also this element too, because when you get the philosophical of it, you know, there's people that will argue, well, if you have more kids in the bigger population, there's more chances you'll get more einstein's and you'll get more things like that, but that also means you get more ted cruz and that also means you'll get more, jo exotics. there's no indication system is right now just adding more people to it is not necessarily going to create einstein. thank you. you know, america is nowhere near a presidential campaign fees. republicans are already i in 2024 in addition to party leaders continuing to fight against the 2020 election result. what we passing voter restriction and playing to trump obsession with ballot audits. the republican national committee recently made a startling statement are in the chair,

rhonda mcdaniel issued a warning that the r n c would advise future g o p. candidates against participating in the commission on presidential debates, events, and less significant changes were made. this is big news because the commission on presidential debates is a non partisan forum that typically enjoys a well reception among both major political party. but like all things leading the republican party today, the ghost of trump moons heavily mcdaniels letter to the form was essentially a rundown of complaint. former president trump made during the debates last year. and here are some of the reforms are and see wants to see happen holding at least one debate before early voting starts limiting board member terms for the commission on presidential debate. beginning commission members from speaking publicly about the candidates, the r as the also called the commission on presidential debates to establish trans your criteria for selection of moderators. the commission on presidential debates has stage debate since 1988 and has never been accused of unfairness before.

mcdaniels asked the commission to reply to her request by the end of july. joining me now to discuss this is best selling author back. sorry we lot of the written out. we love you. i wish i did. but bruce neil, this is interesting because to me, hearing the 2 parties and the republican saying ok, look, we last last election is a little bit like all we're whining quite a bit because we lost them. we want the rules changed the favorites again. but as a guy who's always, i kind of say, i'm a 3rd party guy, you know, or least i hate the 2 party system to me. it's like, yeah, like like if they want to push back against the, the commission, the commission only favors the 2 parties. so there does need to be election reform . i just disagree with how the republicans are going to and i think that would have been a greater argument and one that people could stand by because of the inter, i purposely thought that it was the 2 parties because at the end of the day, the 3rd parties have never really been paid much attention by the commission on

presidential debate anyway. so if they had an argument, it would be valid because they're typically left out and the, the, the weight and the level for them to get in are so much higher in terms of having to win so many primaries in terms of having to have, you know, donor level that a certain at a certain point, it is become extremely difficult and they basically been choked out of these the base, even though they can have some really strong ideas. the other issue with this is that the concerns that were raised by running mcdaniel, we are literally mirroring the exact things that trump had a problem with when he was pushing against the presidential debate last year. literally word for word. everything on that list are things that came out of the horses and you know, when you look at the list and what you list of off, you know, some of the reforms. i want to see ok, who will hold at least one debate before early voting. so, i mean, to me, that's reasonable, just okay before early voting. let's see what you know. let's have a debate that way before people. can i get that living board member terms for commission on the presidential based? hey, i'm always up for, you know, i'm always up for seeing limited things like limited term limits. manning,

commission, members from speaking publicly about candidates can go either way. i mean, you don't want to stroll by, but the one i actually disagree with the most is that they called to have a transparent criteria for selecting moderators. what part of the challenge of running for president is being is being asked questions by everybody. you don't get to pick and choose the softball questions and besides, behind closed doors, they get all the questions ahead of time. anyway, the other issue and that was a really good point. the other issue is that at the end of the day, at least in the past, the national debate cycle, less than half of america actually even watch the debate really didn't make a huge quake in people's decision making process, whether they would have been before the primary started or our early voting or after early building, because the majority of america didn't make their decisions based on that. it is pretty incredible and i think that's a great point to bring up because look at the end of the day, the only time people really are going to turn into the debates because we've, we've american idolized us elections to such an extent now that it really is it's

w w, it's like this guy gets the questions i had of time this guy gets the questions i have time or this lady. i hope at some point, you know, gives the questions ahead of time. and then they battle it out and pre determined answers that they've like worked to death with their handlers. donald didn't really do that and the republicans didn't really have a platform. so it makes sense that now they're like, well, we're whining we last. so we got to, you know, we need it, we want to change all the rules because we need to better suit us. we're seeing that across the country. we are a because this debate, this last debate season was markedly different from his run and 26, where he did not have a record. the debate cycle with different in 2020 because they asked him questions based on his policy. they asked him questions based on where america stood. after 4 years of having donald trump, he had a great opportunity in 2016 of not having to have that conversation because he wasn't president. so it became harder. it's really, it's really incredible watching them just just cry baby, because you know that if the democrats that did this, if they had of loss and trump, we're still president, may be saying why,

why we got to change of how to jo, lose, you know. so i know like how these 2 parties work if one is doing it today, the other will do it tomorrow when they leave, because it kind of fall into that light level of, of just idiocy in my mind. but this is ridiculous and there should be push back against the republican. like i said, i can understand a few reforms. do these things are good, you know, but at the end of the day they should not be accurate. that acquiesced to and just given whatever they ask for, just because they last was not how the system works. if i was a betting person, i would say by july, she's not going to get the answer that she expects. all right, everybody, as we go to break, remember that you can also start watching the hawks on demand through the brand new portable tv app, which is available on all platforms will definitely check it out. portable tv is very cool coming up. it appears that here in america, our leaders are willing to do anything to get folks vaccinated, including offering them trucks, college scholarships, and free guns. yeah. free guns,

infectious disease export dr. bob are not going to discuss that next. so stay tuned to watching the hawks ah ah ah, is your media a reflection of reality? in a world transformed what will make you feel safe for tyson lation community? are you going the right way or are you being that somewhere? which direction? what is truth? what is faith in a world corrupted?

you need to defend the so join us in the depths will remain in the shallows. i close my case work so well. people don't like to use the word inconsistent. they like to say, oh it's, it's amazing. comprehensible, mysterious. when i say it can't be quite right, and this is what direct says, this is what i just sure. i i me, cobit 19 became a regular part of american lives for over a year, mass everywhere, hand sanitizer, social distancing, remote work. we all know the sign, and we were all in it together. as a darknet,

the senate president joe biden made a bold promise to get 100000000 vaccines and armed within his 1st 100 days in office. not only did he meet that goal, he exceeded it. the cdc recently told vaccinated americans they didn't have to wear mass. and even though it led to controversy, it also led to state essentially reopening fully mass golf capacity limits. removed america is back for it. though we're still a long way from that cosy, 60 percent plus heard immunity goal. a conspiracy theory and anti backs are still exist. cobra, 1000 cases in the u. s. hit their lowest point. since the pandemic began. according to axial, those coban infection counts are solo, but the virus is contained contained enough that the new source might have just publish its final weekly cobit tracking map. today, there are fewer than $20000.00 cases per day spread across an american population.

a 331000000 people, but one population is still vaccine. hesitant. pregnant women and women of reproductive age. the speed of the vaccine development, lack of much information relief on the back on expect that moms as well as longitude of studies on fertility for reproductive age women have few the fears, conspiracy theory online, or they're not exactly helping either. workplaces like delta airlines or requiring the vaccine for all new hires. all employees at the university of pennsylvania health system are required to be vaccinated by september 1st. and over $400.00 colleges and universities are required in the shop for students and employees. the workplace mandates have already come under fire for employees, for variety of reasons, but a particularly vulnerable group. pregnant women are extremely wary, and this fear exists from women across the political spectrum. those with fertility concerns feel like they're being boxed in and don't want to be forced to speak to

their bosses about their unique concern. arguing health information should remain private, are pregnant and women hoping to be pregnant. caught in the middle of this fight. here to tell us more infectious disease experts, dr. bob aren't glad to have you talk about dr. bob, it looks like american can take a breather. are we out of the cobra? 1900 woods. are there still risk? we should be thinking about businesses as usual. seems to be the name of the game. where are we being a gun? i mean, i need to report you infections are so low, you've gotten to a level as much in the community should expect less. however, the damage is still raising among those individuals who are on vaccinate, mississippi, the 1st 31st for vaccinations, 46 for economic opportunity, especially for people rich feeling you in. so you do have,

these are going to concern is each new very much and no longer are self that populations in those populations continue to grow the virus you would expect more and more of this. we were very now really pessimistic if you plan for the worst you'll be in working with local schools. i'm warning them for the fall, go back indoors and the risks will come up. so i think you should know it's interesting because president biden announced on wednesday that they're thinking further methods and methods of getting more vaccines in the arms of celebrity more celebrity endorsement partnerships of private sector leaders. expanded outreach models, many are kind of asking, is that at this point, is this overkill. how's the vaccine plateau in america been reached?

you know, have we, finally, we reach that plateau or do we still need to be, you know, keep pressing on where we see, you know, free gardens for, for anyone who gets vaccinated or free cars or college tuition. i mean, we still going to kind of cds door prizes and things like that being handed out just to get that shot in people's arms. i think it's actually what i believe you're trying to screens on such a we have the best vaccination rate by the lowest depths overall everything. we are a circle economy. everybody's back to work, i think is still going to be a real risk, and we don't know what her immunity is. 70 to 8080. since you saw somebody kids and it is hard to get to that level for all the incentives you would externally to say with the giving you guys are crazy

with us for 20 people die every year from gun 7 or 6, the highest rate you would expect that to be you are losing our guns or money, right. 5 of them are shotguns not use using any kind of mass killing fall on the wrong already so interesting about arriving a car to go from one place to the other trying it wouldn't actually, you know where to walk. i'm only trying to argue that matters. people only are going to believe those people kind of west virginia and i cease to a lot of people like you get accustomed gun. you get very used to get

a way to be able to get people who simply believe the media media in terms of vaccinations. many politicians are if you aren't the president. listen. so i think it's intriguing and you'd expect you to see if you are a little busy, but i think we're coming from and dr. bob, anti baxter's, the part of the culture war that you just kind of spoke of misinformation they pushed a lot of americans away from the vaccine. and women of reproductive age in particular, have hesitancy. that hesitancy is driven largely by fertility concerns, concerns that exists across both the democratic and political, the democratic republicans by the aisle. what are doctors influencer, and the health care echoes that them doing to address this concern. if you look at the risk of fertility, apparently there isn't any risk,

at least with these m r n a axis where there's no virus l for your system. i think we should be saying call the axis i wouldn't even system. so in terms of infertility, i had this conversation with number young women, i say i just wouldn't be concerned about me. she's being put on here and i think they're 2 pieces of information. people are given one year. here's a good thing to do and i want to say right, nieces who are bring the drink. oh, you know, match because pregnant women could do worse. early on in london, you know, a lot of the people when you get there were younger one, this is a risk to the babies in terms of still are now are you be made however you get away hotel, this is what you ought to do to protect you saw your maybe he just because the timeline is what when they say i

use you register with the cdc when you take all this information. so it's not as high as you study. $35000.00 women, now each other was no higher risk study. but i understand very well educated when you look at the issue and say, we don't how all the data matter is. we're going to have to decide based on what we show you to work with your team last year. she's just seen fascists in the country. i think she's going to lead the cdc back towards greatest glory. her advice has your problem. you should consider the vaccine. i think it's like in this world, the real data decide for themselves,

getting the recommendation rather than the missing the 2 of them because there's no trust. that's where the confusion and chaos comes with dr. always a pleasure having you are. thank you for educating our audience. today, boyle, boy, a lot to cover is good to be back. i'm happy to be next to you again, looking forward to moving forward. glad to have you. all right, everybody, that is our show for you today. remember everyone in this world, we are definitely not told that we are loved enough. so i tell you all, i love you, i am ty rovan and i have a nice across. keep on watching all those hawks out there and have a great day and all night everybody ah, the,

we're segregated all along my social class. most people don't know. so when i 1st, if you're born into a 4 family, you're born into a minority family. if you're born into a family that only has a single parent that really constrains your live chances, people die on average. 15 years old, you born a generational poverty is a, it's a fight every day to meet your needs and the needs of your family. me ah, financial survival guide, daisy, let's learn about fill out. let's say i'm a joy and your grief. i'm grief on face of the fight, while 3 prod, thank you for helping with joy.

that fell out that way. ah. i don't know. i mean, there's some steps in there were rescuing the food that they were scabbing or, or where were rescuing resources that are still good. this is best by march 21st, which is in 2 days. all these potatoes, hall panels, onions, all of these came from waste ground sources. this is great for me because i'm always looking for a way to give things away. dr. because the tax laws, you know, definitely do benefit the wealthier people and our society. so it makes sense for them to throw it out right off, rather than give it to somebody who could use it, then that person is not going to buy it.

the russia is high level economic for i'm in st. pete berg heads top here with president non seeing that countries pushing ahead with infrastructure for a vaccine tourism industry. when you look up, we are just covering our own needs. we can also provide foreign citizens with charles to come to russia and get vaccinated. here i would like to ask the government to analyze all aspects of this issue. by the end of the month. there's consensus out the fans wide spread bucks a nation is the only way to get the world economy back on its fades with austria as chancellor showing his support for the russian job as part of the global fight back sort of came. it doesn't matter where of axis comes from, from russia, from the us or from china.