in budapest, well, george, you and i've been watching very carefully, be the flipping of the narrative as we weren't here. where even a few weeks ago, even whispering online that there was a possible alternative explanation for the advent of the pandemic. you would have been just crazy, a conspiracy not case and to be avoided and to be shunned and probably band ok. now we see the narrative changing. now, no one on this program is going to make any definitive claims because we can't, we don't have the information, but there seems to be a trickle effect. you know, the narrative that was established by the ruling leads is be, it's unraveling before our eyes and will they be held account because weapons of mass destruction? nope, they got that one wrong. ok. and then explaining why there was a financial crisis in 2008 and who benefited who last? then we have this entire told me that during the trump administration where

anything he said was a lie. ok, they have scrambled. the public see are so badly, they are put egg on their face and there's no reason whatsoever to trust these people whatsoever. everything they touch, they get wrong. george, where you summarize that perfectly. we say we have the weapons of mass destruction, claims disasters. war not only did no one's not for any consequences other than obviously the iraq is and the dead and wounded american servicemen. but the people were elevated into procedures. positions on tv shows that they came pundits. they got nice, well paying gigs that think tanks. there were celebrated, they got everything wrong, there was celebrated. and then of course, there was the russian gate. you had the full year, the unremitting propaganda. that's the what is 16 election was stolen by the

russian. trump was working for fruit in the russians, where everywhere again, no one piece of evidence has ever come with anybody. all of the evidence that has come forward has refuted these slaves yet no one has suffered any consequences to the only ones who have been suffered. consequences whether people will unfairly personally use this for supposedly working for put in such as michael flynn or roger stone. so what do we have here? so we were told that we stupid rooms don't understand science. this is, this is science pandemic. he's a global pandemic. leave it to bill gates, leave it to tony, fall cheese. they understand these things. you know, we don't know anything. now suddenly, at john's out that this virus was the product of scientists undertaking. reckless research looks like this was research founded

by us taxpayers, scientists who didn't bother to make sure that proper safety protocols were in place. 1 because these were very dangerous experiments, worst of all sciences who deliberately misled the public because they knew a great deal. tony crouching you a great deal about this. and yet he misled the public. he went into one white house meeting after another, and never so much as gave a hint about gain of function research going on and who had a lab and the u. s. w. quite a lot about these gain of function research, boy, for any price, no, he's already find a very nice book do particularly and stop here. to name is synonymous when again or function. ok, that is obviously been represented to the public. mark is one of the things that we looked, you know, i started out with the,

the iraq war here. don't you find a really remarkable the professional manager at, at different points and in time, in places they are experts on weapons. they're experts on climate, they're experts on science, they're experts on russian ok. and this professional managerial class, they are so in tune with their own accreditation and their moral superiority over everyone else is that, you know, it ends up being just an accreditation class without any kind of stuff. and because everything they touch goes wrong with this demick, you know, russia gay was, you know, lucian in people's mind. lockdown is real. when you lost your job, you lost your family, you lost your help, you lost your future. that is real and someone must be held accountable and we know exactly well, i'm not going to sit here and act as a defense counsel for the chinese. government's will approach the matter as

a legitimate call of law with the likes of which cannot be found as, for example, the height. so i expect, in fact, on demand credible concrete evidence from those american politicians and journalists who are claiming about china is responsible for what is known as cobra. 9 themes, not circumstantial evidence, nor he said concrete evidence which will clearly and fasick lee indict the chinese government boss. i'm surprised and leave. no such evidence has been for coming from those american politicians like hell. the americans out of course, the british made claims in the past, which were never so she ate it. so for instance, yes,

bare is the claim and there was proved to be a lie that iraq had weapons of mass destruction. so the americans and the british lied that they live about the search committee, genocide, the cost of our talk. yeah. they lied about colonel gadhafi preparing to commit genocide in bang, darcy. so no evidence is ever actually put forward by these people. yes, on the one hand, they are not experts when it comes to weapons of mass destruction. they're not experts when it comes to an experts when it comes to the form. yugoslavia certainly not experts when it comes to medicine and science bots. the real question is, why are they allowed to act as they do? because they know when i say by, on refine so in this instance, american politicians,

they know that american mainstream major will not hold them to account. why? because american mainstream major is neither free nor independent. so that is why american politicians and also equivalence in britain already been some make such outlandish claims, such grand claims of any massa they choose to because they know they will not be scrutinized. they know they will not have to corroborate their assertions with concrete evidence. so at the beginning, i said this matter should be approached as a court of law would approaches. and if you approach it as a proper course of law, would the case would be thrown out because there is no concrete evidence. the only evidence that american politicians and journalists are putting forward is merely circumstantial. and here say that is not good enough. george, the, the problem per the, per managerial class year is that at the end of the day,

they don't have a problem blaming another country we, we've seen really, russia falls, it's around falls, north korea falls in the usual thing here. the problem is, is that the, there are so many high level officials, voucher and voucher like visuals that are just he hip deep in all of this and they don't know how to use separate. that's why they never went down there about oh, because something from races and all that. it's just the cover as much nonsense. okay. on the face of it, it's a stupid nonsense and they knew it. but if you look closely at an alternative theory, you're going to be looking at people not just been basing or on, you know, they will get a lot of people in washington. that's exactly right. i mean, i think what hasn't really been a major accusation against china. what happened in the united states was that when you pull the professional managerial class sees on the virus as

a way finally to get rid of trumpeting trumps, seem to be coasting towards reelection. suddenly they sold this as an opportunity to make a blame him. it's all his fault called a virus. he didn't respond quickly enough, but strongly enough use responsible for the economic downturn. he's responsible for the anti chinese being the, the as the asian racism he's responsible for that is a native is, is that a folk that wasn't really a major attempt to attack china glory. i mean, it was when nancy pelosi says it's the trump virus. it's not the child that was, it's the trump virus. so i was just showing it is agree here with marcus. i mean the, the faces that he cited iraq cooperated with the international weapons inspectors. i mean, he said we're going to throw everything open even, but that wasn't good enough for an american lead that was determined on war. so anything happening you? remish, monopolies,

throw open cost to all of the inspectors. the o. s. the sent in the inspectors. they withdraw the inspectors in order to facilitate the bombing. china has refused to cooperate with the international inspector. so when they will help the organization put forward a plan to inspect the, the, the bar tricks china bulk and refused to do with any one other. then there man would just be the de sac. so obviously the report that the w h o came up with was ludicrous handed by someone who was an interested party. so i think this is a little bit different from the previous cases, but, but what is the same here as the market? this is there, there is no accountability. i mean, it's really quite remarkable in my, in my mind is how all of these pay people fail upward. you can be really wrong just about everything in your career, but you just get a better air condition office outside washington

d. c. when they're very nice income, given another mandate, the screw up and then you just keep moving forward. nobody's ever held account. and all of these can be seen in this century alone. and it's because this is the professional literature protecting itself. it is a racket. go ahead, last answer goes the markets and the data that is a common pass and, and we have seen this in the last 30 years. and specifically, since the dissolution of the soviet union, when america was very aware that it had no competition any longer on the international stage, when they knew there was no counter balance. so american global design and best thought american politicians and american journalists felt, and bolden to say what ever they wanted about any subject matter as they pleased. so one of the things that any of this has in common is that the countries which are

focused, which are targeted by american politicians or american mainstream journalists just happens to be countries which pursue an independent foreign policy. we're going to discuss this a little bit more, and then the next part of our program we're going to, i'm gonna jump in here. we're going to go to a short break. and after that your break, we'll continue our discussion on some real estate of our t. ah ah, the ah, ah

bank guys or financial survival guide. when customers go buy, you reduce the price. now well, reduce a lower undercutting. what's good for food market? it's not good for the global economy, although driven by remove, shaped by bankers and those in the me. i think we dare to ask me

ah welcome at the cross stop where all things are considered. i'm peter labelle. this is the home edition. to remind you, we're discussing some real issues. ah. okay, just go back to budapest. george has change gears here. all 3 of us have a long enough memory to remember when the whole issue of human rights was injected into foreign policy. we are usually associated with jimmy carter. jimmy carter's name is john mentioned all the time these days, i would say for many wrong reasons, but in this case it's true. jimmy carter very much highlighted in principle. i have no problem with, but if it's weaponized, then i do have

a problem with it. we saw in the anchorage some in the past few months when the secretary of state was lectured by his chinese counterpart and much of what the chinese delegate had to say could have been taken from the play book of the democratic party throwing, throwing it right back in here and other countries are doing this as well. mean, if you can look at what, how can it country like the u. k. talk about human rights when julia saw is languishing in prison. how, how, how can a country like the united states holding hundreds of people without bail for the crime of what loitering, because of the january 6 a riot here. i mean, it's very easy to weaponized and it's one can do it and everyone can do it. and i think that this is something that is a shock to the professional managerial class is the only wheel are allowed to talk

about valleys. not anyone else. typography ahead, george. that's exactly right. i mean, you remember during the cold war the west use of talk about human rights. we talk about, you know, political rights and then the soviet union would talk. oh yeah. all right. well, we may not be great. the political right. but we've got economic and social rights that you don't have. so you know, everyone, everyone has a job. everyone has a house. and so you know, we care, but people go to the west dismissed that argument because west was more prosperous . so be going to say, well, we do better at this than you do, but i mean it became of the west and a lot of fun with it in the days of the this is the so when you have them, say, gaskin done. yeah. and then you had, of course, also yes, and the san are already go. there's a lot of people are being prosecuted for what for their political views. i mean, they've done their committed no crime. they were opposed to the government and it was the, you know, the west just had a lot of fun with that. and the soviet union really didn't have

a very good onset of that. that has changed because now russia very good onset. i mean for instance, i mean we talked about this for roman protection, it's now growing brother david was involved in instigating violence in off in the aftermath of the election in bell or else he was instigating it while he was in poland with the direct evidence that he was instigating it. he was in the as of battalion, whatever he was doing that that is a while and organization. now you mentioned during his lunch. no, there's no evidence that all that he was involved in any kind of there's nothing on it. he, you know, publish information and yet that's is happening in the u. k. the very same u. k, but lectures, others about media freedom. and then you have the case of the, the capital riots where people, hundreds of people have been arrested that charge,

that some of them are in prison without bail. they're in solitary confinement for war, for loitering, for trespassing. and the prosecution just gets to postpone again and again, we're bringing the cases to trial. why? because they want to use it for political ends as they move into an election year. so here you are clearly persecuting people for the holidays, so there's no record of it. no, no evidence of any of these people committed any violence that real crime is tito, except the legitimacy of the bi election victory. you can argue that you disagree with it, but that that's all they hold the wrong views and they are being punished for it. so yeah, the tables have indeed been reversed markers. what really makes this tragic is that we should think about human rights. ok. and that is a legitimate area of concern here,

but if you politicize that you cheap in it because then you're just looking to score points. you don't care about the cause you care about as a scoring appoint against your opponent in the media. i mean it's, is it just more of a p r strategy than it is having a genuine concern for the some people's rights being violated? i mean, that's what i find that is really, really sad about it is because it is in itself, it's a good idea. but the way it's being practice is in a nation. and people in the hope that the idea of human rights itself is just completely denigrated, go ahead markets. what we have over the last for 2 years. and especially the last 20 years is the appropriation and distortion of was a concept by liberals such as democracy, equality, racism, progressiveness diversity and of course human rights. now the

aforementioned was a concept today in 2021 on a council town near liberals, especially in america and in britain have appropriated undistorted the maintenance of these so their own. deprived agendas means that these was and concepts have lost all meaning in the well today. so we say in america and also in britain neo liberal activists. for example, phone b woke, cooling for racism to be counted by taking the knee in honor of a hardened criminal who but go into the apartments of a pregnant black woman and then a threatened to kill the same woman by japanese gun stock. that is absolutely. pope sick bought it served as another demonstration that

racism as was racism when i call have lost all meaning. and if we turn to the american and british governments when it comes to, schumann writes, well, the americans and the british has never truly been committed to the concepts of human life during the cold war. and after the cold war. what i would argue the difference is that during the cold war, the mosque was more or less a chill on the faces of the americans. and the british bots, following the end of the cold war. and in particular, the dissolution of the u. s. s. off both countries became complacent. they became even more arrogant, and that is when the mask drops, because they felt, as i said, moments ago, they could do as they please on the international stage because there was no counter balance. so today, human rights is actually

a weapon that can be used against the americans. and british, the british for instance, make no secrets of their close strategic friendship and relationship with saudi arabia, which is one of the most abominable countries in the world. and the americans are still holding. prison isn't guantanamo who has not been charged with any offenses. so the americans and the british ought, in, in my opinion, quite in a precarious situation today, the likes of which they were not saying to in the cold war. so i believe martin, a complacency has helped to limit and we can that hold on the welds. but, you know, george, you know, whenever you confront these people, they have one word for you, your races. i mean, not in my lifetime. i mean, you know, it, we've had times where, you know, when calling someone a socialist or something like that was like, oh my goodness. i mean,

we've gotten so far away from that now because they don't want to have a conversation and then may end up using words like equity. like what the hell does that mean? ok, you don't agree with it. if you don't even understand that you are a racist, i mean, this is how, but now debate has become a, become has been now, is saying that you stand per human rights and it comes from those people. ok, you know, and you know, equity for all, but you know, but if you don't believe we, then you're somehow a room in retrograde and then you can have a conversation because if you don't leave an equity that you're not even worth talking to, i mean this is the, this is destroying any kind of logical discourse. right. so that's, that's exactly right. but i think marcus makes an excellent point about this broad of black lives matter. and this mandatory taking of the knee is there somehow by doing so. you are opposing racism. no, you are actually celebrating an organization that is dedicated to war, racism,

leave aside the fact that it's obviously a multi $1000000.00 racket in which what corporations shut out. millions without even bothering to wonder where is the money going? you know, even to be likely to read. yeah. a lot of money can much of any organization in the world anywhere. dispos those tens of millions of dollars and no one off. what do you actually spending this money on? yeah, so that's, that's absolutely the case. but what is really happening is that you're getting that us, you gave france and what you're being told still as if, when you know this is still 975, and you lecture the world on human rights as we are exemplars of the respecting human right. where we're, where we're the with george, where we're the human rights for the best. exactly, that's another exactly i,

this is the point that the president gotten made at the st. petersburg can all be form that you attended your luck. there are people who have rubber bullets shot of them. they lost their eyes. can you imagine if we did anything of the source, the other world would respond and it wasn't. i mean, racism is one response. oh, what about is and what about is a no. what about isn't, it's actually clearly indicated that, you know, actually the performance of the western countries is worse than i don't russia, russia actually treat it's prisoners war you mainly now. then will the western countries, i mean, the violence that is used against the people who protested against the lockdown, the violence against the yellow vest. and now this brutal imprisonment of the people who are involved on january 6, clearly the west wreck or is it. we don't even have to go into saudi arabia,

the west, west and rushes last 30 seconds, gotta you, marcus, go ahead. well, i think it's a very depressing states of affairs, and i think it's one that's not going to improve anytime soon. unless the ordinary person in america and in griffin, actually learns to say no, no to be one rabble who never answering so a conversation into a discussion because that risks losing the document on the merits. so they will just simply end any prospects of a discussion by a critic houston. you will be racist all being islamic phobic or be in a fight. so unless people in america, britain say enough is enough. we are going to take back our society than this cancer will just become worse and was this made this to them? i don't talk to ok that i don't know why gentlemen. that's all the time. we have one of the, i guess in the past and let and i want to thank you for watching is geared are you

seeing next time? remember the ah, the, i don't know. i mean, there are some steps in there were rescuing the food that they were not scabbing or were rescuing resources that are still good. this is best buy march 21st, which is in 2 days. all these potatoes, paula pianos, onions, all of these came from waste, found sources this is great for me because i'm always looking for a way to give things away. dr. because the tax laws, you know, definitely do benefit the wealthier people and our society. so it makes sense for

them to throw it out right off, rather than give it to somebody who could use it. and then that person is not going to buy it. ah, is your media a reflection of reality? in a world transformed what will make you feel safer? tyson lation, whole community. you going the right way? where are you being that somewhere? direct. what is true? what is faith? in the world to corrupted, you need to defend the so join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah,

as a career professionals bought is much tougher on some than others. she was year old myer by everybody. so why would somebody believe me? i was just a little girl. the price paid to, to, to, to really was me was how to read the paper this morning. usa swimming coach, arrested, allegedly had sex with a 12 year old girl. this happens almost every week. we get calls at the office. i get informed about one of my greatest fears is someone's going to start linking all this together. there's going to be a 60 minute documentary about youth coaches in sports like gymnastics swimming. is that documentary? see it on our team. the

twitter is angry about this recent blocking in jury a saying that a free and open incident is an essential human rights. the same sign, the platform senses. it's american use gunning down white people for us like cars, just a galle university told her class, and that was fun to see julia. most audio of the let just spoke outraged something . she was branded a typical white reaction. i began my talk by saying that if i start talking about race in this way, i'm a free. the 2nd one and white people followed the textbook like the u. s. and she's the medical advisor calls for the health records of 9 people in china, including blue ham lab work is giving new life to the covey lab. believe.