mental after the turn in the ah, the french president get sloughed in the face while trying to get up close and personal with a crowd of well wishers in southern front. also ahead to a germany think this by the sent from smore you say by removing the power of veto. the foreign minister accuses them upholding the block of video of an american father and daughter speaking yards against critical race theory has gone viral, receiving 2000000 views on twitter. it comes, i made an ongoing debate in the us about the role of c, r c. and education and politics. how we treat people with, based on me,

they are in their mind. tomorrow i across the globe or run the clock. this is our team from the team. and myself, you know, little hello and welcome to the program. and manual micron. go the enough, the shop today during a visit to this on the fronts where he's trying to drum up support for his pre election campaign. he walked up to a barrier to greek locals. and this is what happened next. the 2 men who being arrested following that assault on president macro. and it's the 1st time that you've been physically assaulted since becoming president, that happens in the south of france near the city of violin. and that's the story

that you present mike on exits a hotel school where he's been taking a visit. he walks towards a crowd of people who are all behind the battle barrier. then present. michael puts his hand on a man's on the man and grabs back president michael and before administering that, all my c slap, the security agency immediately intervened, and 2 individuals were taken into custody for willful violence against the person holding public authority offenses. taking pretty seriously hearing phones and could see somebody put in jail for up to 3 years as well as paying a fine, a 45000 years. but of course, that would be up for a judge to decide how lenient they may wish to be. and of course for an individual to be found guilty of the offense, there's been a huge reaction hearing from including coming from the government, the prime minister showing cas 6 saying that this was an attack on democracy.

democracy is debate, dialogue is confrontation, the expression of legitimate disagreements, but it can in no way be violence, verbal, aggression, and even less physical aggression. we are all concerned, it is the foundations of our democracy through the head of states. it is democracy that is targeted. also, we've heard from a political policy from across the political spectrum with authorization. lead is pretty much on the same page, very rare hearing from all saying that this is simply unacceptable. while democratic debate can bitter, it can never tolerate physical violence. i strongly condemn the unacceptable physical aggression targeting the president of the republic. this time, are you starting to understand that violent people are taking action? i stand in solidarity with the president. well, president, marconi is currently on the top from says it's been cold, he's taking the temperature, testing it to see whether or not he should be running in next is presidential

election. he hasn't officially said he's going to, but the idea that he's making this visit is seen as many as a pre election tool. and you might have caught just the end of that video, somebody shouting down with macro ism and there is a suggestion that the individuals behind this assault on the president or yellow vest revolt and unauthorized protest earlier in the day. but the reality is, what this is shown is that there is still an under current to present to and again president michael and his policies. those have been passed. the reforms as well as those he's attempted to pass him in front of the house and managed to do so. always hot water them down slightly. and it seems as we get closer and closer to the election, we like to see more of that resentment coming through. but for the moment in front, present my phone associate with 2 individuals in the south of from now under arrest, wound for violence against the person holding public authority.

let's bring you another of a headline stories. the days of small e u country standing up to the big players could soon be over. germany's foreign minister wants to silence the dissenting voices of the likes of hungry by abolishing vito powers. we cannot let veto be used to paralyze european foreign policy and hold us hostage. those who do that are playing with europe, cohesion in the short and long term. that's why we must say openly the veto moscow . even if that means that we ourselves can be out voted, i remain confident that the subject of a majority decision will take center stage during discussions at the conference on the future of europe. while the german foreign minister hagen must didn't mention any you meant the states by name when saying that the veto was being misused and should be banned. it's pretty clear who he was talking about. we can extract plates

as well from statements we've heard from mr. mass in the past, as well as tweets made by senior figures within his foreign ministry. this is directed firmly towards hungry, budapest, and prime minister of hungry victor or bond. the reason is they think victor all bonds being too overzealous when it comes to the use of this v. so hungry used to a veto just last week to stop a joint statement on hong kong. they've done something similar back in april as well. and just recently, budapest nicks the, another statement from the european union, calling for a, a ceasefire in hostilities between palestinians and the state of israel. we've also seen poland and hungary team up to delay the signing the ratification of the, the new budget just last year. now, what's the response to this from hungary has been as well. victor oberon, the gary in prime minister,

is far from happy with german foreign minister hiker muss the european left led by the german left as once again the taking hungry in an outrageous tone. this time on the basis that our country wasn't willing to sign a joint declaration on hong kong that lacked any political weight and seriousness whatsoever. we will exercise our. it's guaranteed by the european union's founding treaties when it comes to things like tax budgets and foreign policy, the european union has to be marching in lock step, meeting all $27.00 nations. have to agree to any statements or a moves concerning the big things. what this move would do would be to get rid of that. and in the past, what we've seen is these, this be so being used as leverage. basically you see one country go, i'm not signing that until my if you that is most pressing to me has been signed. what this would do that hiker masters talking about is almost certainly it would

speed up the decision making processes. but it would get rid of perhaps some of the say that small nations have in the european union. another thing that's worth noting, in order to get what mr. mass would like, it would require all 27 member states to sign off on getting rid of the v t. so, and if you listen, see what victor all been and hungry has to say just to her to what mr. muff proposed. we can see that happening anytime soon. and just to continue with this story, i spoke with political on communications consultant damian wilson. he believes scrubbing your research powers can only be damaging for the block. smaller states. i think it's a very useful device for the smaller nations because without it, it's the, the large notion like germany, like france will just bully the small nations into doing whatever they want. every nation within that, the $27.00 nations left have their own history, have their own problems, have their own outlooks on, on the wider world. they should be allowed to keep those without being forced into

a corner or bribed and bullied by by the logic asians. the problem with the use is really desperately wants to be seen as of one united voice that speaks on the world stage. you see that they've been invited to to the g 7 meeting in the u. k this week, but they're not one of the 7. they're, they're a plus one. so they're really on the outside on the fringes of it and annoyed them that they can't get that united voice and, and be given the presence in the end that the, the limelight that they think they deserve to. the quality activists in the us have find a new way of getting rich by telling white women races they are. they are organizing special dinners, where their host coff up large sums of money for the privilege of being lectured ortiz. dmitri po, can tell us more on this episode of things crazy people do, white liberal women line up to pay $5000.00 for a dinner,

where 2 women of color berate them on how races they are. sounds like a lot of fun. now i'm sure some of you are confused by the concepts or how something like this came to be. so here it is. it's all organized by 2 people, regina jackson, who was black and say, you're a row who identifies as indian american. if you're wondering what kind of people, jackson and row are, well, here's a few quotes. we all know about white women's tears. it has caused the tears of 100, maybe even thousands of black people, and it's still a weapon. white people would rather die than tell the truth about white supremacy races and the roland both. yeah. a lovely bunch. anyway, once upon a time they got into an argument about race with a white friend over dinner. much to their surprise, a few months later, the woman they had the argument with said she actually enjoyed it and asked for another dishing out and promised to call some other white women for the party.

essentially that's ho raised to dinner was started. the format of the dinner goes like this, a group of white women pay $5000.00 for the events which is hosted at one of their houses. once they're done counting their piles of cash, jackson in rao, dig into the attendees, trying to uncover their subconscious racism with questions like how are you racist? what's a racist thing or thought you've done recently? if a woman doesn't have an answer, according to ro, well that's just typical racist behavior. all of this is done in the most aggressive manner possible. men to quote shatter white fragility, but tears an outrage at these events are strictly prohibited. it does all sound a bit, masochistic, but pay there's no accounting for taste. white women love dinner parties more than anything. it's their safe space to talk about how much they hate their husbands. how their kids are super annoying. how crazy busy. they are. the latest school auction, they're raising money for,

you turn to place where they typically unleashed their entire c whiteness into somewhere where you can actually have safe, not shameful conversations around racism. having started this back in 2019, jackson and ro have since expanded the premise. i guess they grew tired of just braiding self loathing, progressive white women. so now they're telling them how to carry the lesson and white fragility even further and make a change at the events are no longer limited to dinner. so now the breakfast, lunch cocktails, and even brunch all popular past times of privileged white females. naturally the internet has had a field day with the story. ah, it's unclear if these masochistic self flagellation dinners will ever actually lead

to any change in society, let alone a good one. but one thing for sure. as long as progressive white women feel they are unconsciously racist. jackson and ro might never again have to pay for a meal. i think it's ironic and elitist that they will pay that they will pay $5000.00 in order in order to learn how the rate that they are, what kind of experience birch is signaling. and i really, truly believe it's just another way of people fencing with their white gill, the crazy thing i've ever read. and i don't think that that actually does the trick that to actually learn anything. by doing that, it feels like these 2 women that are in charge of the dinner. it feels like it almost feels like a game of some sort that they're playing on the white women when i really think it's going on here, is that these women are really capitalizing on the white gill of the wealthy

melanie colette, seeing what i think a lot of people are thinking and why summer caching in on walk this video of an american father, daughter jewel, speaking out against the idea known as critical race theory, has gone viral on social media. it comes amid an ongoing debate in the u. s. about the role of c, r t and education and politics. primarily, it doesn't matter if you're black or white or any doesn't matter if you're black, white, brown? yeah. right. black in how we treat people is based on who they are and if they're not in tomorrow, see, this is, this is our choosing. think right here, critical race theory wants to in. now we, my children is not going to have that message resonating with a lot of people. the videos clocked up some 2000000 views on twitter already. the theory itself was put forward almost half

a century ago and essentially suggest that racism is systematic within society. c r t has been widely criticized with many calling for a bond on its teaching in schools. earlier i spoke to the man behind the video. i just think people are waking up to what's going on in the vision that's been going on. and i think people are tired, man, their teacher that are tar, that are writing me people going up to school boards now. yeah, i think people want to stand up because they see that they're trying to brainwash our children into seeing each other for the color they are and not the character that they are. how would you describe corey, why critical race theory as proof? so devices i would say when you tell any group of people that their whole pressures, because of the color of their skin and you tell the other group that they are a pressed because of the color and they're seeing, you're going to find push back. you are going to see people standing up. we know

a martin luther king said, right just by the content of our cares and the color of our scheme. and when we see people trying to implement that into our schools on to our children, you're going to see pushback. you haven't held back talking, but black lives matter either. you said the movement is for the destruction of america under families. can you just open up and why did you say that? well, the co founder said she was a marxist. so we know what marxism leads to and that's communism that socialism. so for me and for america, that's not what we're about. all right, that was the 1st half of news block. don industrial plenty more coming up after the break. hopi stick with us. the driven by dreams shaped by person

in me the dares thing. we dare to ask me when i would show the wrong when i just don't need you to fill out the thing because the attitude an engagement equals the trail. when so many find themselves, well, the part we choose to look for common ground in

the, in the moon. ah, if the minutes past the hour, you're very welcome back, you k are advising foreign property investors to steer clear of britain. they warn the developers are selling on safe, real estates covered, and the type of clothing that led to the greenfield powered tragedy. often they say, such coverings are either a useless work list or come with a host of hidden costs related to fire safety. we spoke to ben fox, the creator of an online mop of sue named problem properties. the u. k. as is now none of the building and none of the lease holds particularly new builds, can be trusted to be purchased. because why find in the range of buildings

that's ah, unsafe have issues and ultimately, except the 8th of the us, one ratings on our valued. they were pounds, you know, they can't be sold again. so we want people's particularly from overseas, tend to be very careful with buy in buildings, especially from the major developers, are still marketing overseas. the clothing scandal received worldwide attention when grand found her in london, went up in flames. back in 2017. the fire, which started from a fridge, freezer on the 4th floor, spread rapidly because of the clothing. it took almost an entire day for firefighters to contain the blaze. with 72 people losing their lives. r t show the edward dusty looks at how the government is moving forward. almost 4 years on from the grunfeld tower tragedy. the government is still trying to learn from it.

especially as thousands of homes across the country are still covered in the very same material. grunfeld was the deadline to apply for funding to remove the closing, but already many of how to fit the bill themselves to keep that home safe after grandchild. in june 2018, we will immediately had to pay for waking watches were still painful waking watches. so now you know, our service charges have, you know, skyrocket we are facing another bill of so far. this is around 33000 to remove the cladding, but i think it's more we are really, really struggling. i'm a pensioner, i'm 76 and all my savings for now. and i can find work students append to me the 1st phase of the public inquiry into the grunfeld tower tragedy that came the lives of 72. from the having was the principal reason for the rapid spread of the

fire. but to give you an idea of the scale of the ongoing crisis currently around full point, $6000000.00 flats are still considered dangerous due to the material on them. also making them on sellable. and while the government has agreed to crop up 5000000000 pounds, that's only a 3rd of what's actually needed. and a legal amendment protecting homeowners from hefty bills was voted down by the conservatives in april. we had demonstrated, certainly have been to, you know, we are still in talks with the bill barrels to build up. have we, you know, what these properties in good faith have to foot. the bill has been to m p. 's and even the opposition leader tried to, you know, put forward a bill to chased of these whole loss. but of course the conservatives bought it down and so we're back to square one. the government insists residents of being

shielded from those call. building safety remains the responsibility of the building owner and they must take swift action to remediate safety issues without passing on costs to leaseholders opportunities. making sure residents are safe in their homes as quickly as possible, and we are doing everything in our power to ensure that remediation work backed by government funding is completed to the highest standard. but none of this is stop the government from taking out foreign investors and selling off those dangerous building. unsurprisingly, then closing outrage among those effected i did a bit of research. i couldn't find any project to kind of show you how many buildings across the u. k. over my or anything like that. and i was quite concept by the read. you can change and you will be liable for the costs. so i might get to build in that hasn't got it in yet. muncie by the recipe can change and you will be liable for the costs. besides rates in meant that we now pay 61000 pounds

a week 424752 12. certainly not in the interest of the british economy in regards to overseas buyers. if they see maybe one or 2 buildings that have the issue, they will think it's ok. i will be safe with a new bill. if we can prove from our math that people are registering building for our new builds, you know, they are all over the country. they are different heights different ages. we are proven that this is a nationwide problem for 4 years on from the grunfeld tower tragedy. and still thousands of people are going to bad night scared if another tragedy is simply waiting to happen. to address such d all to london. western european trees are reportedly accusing increase of feeling to hold on to the migrants arriving on its shores. 6 nations

led by france and germany have reportedly written to the european commission. they say that after being granted asylum in greece, thousands are then heading north on filing secondary claims and richer countries. germany, for example, has apparently received 17000 such applications since late last summer. the joint letters said the problem is partially to a degree feeling to provide adequate conditions for migrants. an allegation often denies some national chords. consider that greece is not assuring that these persons are given suitable accommodation and provided with a minimum level of physical subsistence. grace is fully compliant with his obligations regarding border control, registration of a regular rivals, reception, asylum process and integration programs. and it's not responsible for any regular secondary flows. keeping illegal migrants out of the u. s. party. the java from tex,

the agency charged with securing the external border. but according to the european court of auditors, it's failing to do its job. a maltese former government minister, the chief auditor of the report, said the problem is getting worse from texas, presently not discharging that due to the fact that when we found that this is even more wiring to tie one front tech's has been given added responsibilities from tex has responded to those claim thing it's undergone, a must have transformation that would have tellers to any organization, but is aware that improvements are needed. notice, maria, a greek member of the european parliament, told us athens has no control over migrants who legally leave the country and try to resettle elsewhere. the problem is that there are some german codes that except it, that those people that have been granted asylum from greece. they have the right to apply the 2nd 2nd time for what i saw in germany. but this is

a decision by the gentleman quotes. and this has nothing to do with grace. and furthermore, you should take into account that the frank said gentlemen, in the netherlands and those of belgium, they were obliged to go out by the, by the location system. it's the problem with their france and germany to find those people and send them back to if they can violate the 2nd rules and they stay more than 3 months. we don't money. well pay. there are people from front big. so that's it. working great, in the case of the island of sub was, there are 2 boats from the deadman course and they are there. so they, they tried to do their job. but, and i think there are many people waiting for working for front runner that says should the again, should make if you should do its job better. but the nature of the union that gave

from the it's not the initial bridge, more great programs get their start and moments here in our teeth. stay close to see what's being served up forever. you're watching from today by for the join me every thursday on the alex summon, show and i'll be speaking to guess from the world, the politics sport. business. i'm show business. i'll see you then me as a korea professional sport is much tougher on some than others. are euro, mired by everybody. so why would somebody believe me? i was just a little girl. the price paid to, to,

to achieve really was was how to read in the paper this morning. usa swimming coach, arrested, allegedly had sex with a 12 year old girls. this happens almost every week. we get calls at the office. i get informed about one of my greatest fears is someone's going to start linking all this together. there's going to be a 60 minute documentary about youth coaches in sports wyatt, phone r t. my name. is that documentary? see it on the, on the moon. me. i actually don't want any variables, but i'm happy to have one. yeah, of course

we're, we're not doing anything illegal. so this there would be a law against it. but there is no law against taking food from the trash in. the stores are not giving the food away. the reason that there are stores just for people to make money. there's no announcement that's made 20 minutes before the store closes. attention customers. the food you're now looking at will very soon in 20 minutes. be on the curb outside. don't bother buying it. you can get it for free . so, the reason the stores are uncomfortable or the management of stores to people who work there might be uncomfortable about seeing people salvaging. the good food that they throw out is because it might be a threat to their business. we're

rescuing the food. it's not like we're not scavenging or we're rescuing resources that are still good. i teach english as a 2nd language and a few different colleges in town, liberty, college fair, but happened college and patient diversity. i can afford to shop. it's not like i'm starving. but the environmental issue is a big thing. i have a 12 year old son and i feel bad out the world. we're leaving him. and i know that me taking the odd thing here. there is not going to change anything, but if a lot more people did it, there be a lot less stuff going into the waste stream. and i'm getting some eating the food that i get of recycling the packaging. and composting what i don't eat, so i feel like if, you know, it's a little bit, but it's just, you know, be, had 7000000 people. all that a little bit would make a math difference. food waste is a dagger in problem that i think many people.