only likely to cement this view for many across the continent that astrazeneca is no longer trustworthy. or that does a for me, this are, i will be back with your headlines. and let's say 30 minutes. this is our, to intervention me. i the ah,

me the the news the readings and value taishan. here in the united states of america, we are not just entering into the heart of summer. but we are also now officially neck deep. in our most patriotic time of the year, you see fresh off a memorial day where we celebrated all us soldiers who lost their lives while serving in the u. s. military industrial complex comes june 14th flag day, which as you may have guessed, celebrates the old red, white, and blue the star spangled banner, old glory. i'm of course,

talking about the united states flag. and while raising and waving the u. s. flag would be celebrated as a very patriotic act, at least on tv. behind the scenes here in washington, dc. real patriotism move that doesn't come in red, white and blue. no real patriotism here in d. c, that comes in green, green, and well, even more green. according to a new report compiled by the nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, public citizen, the $55.00 large corporations that paid 0 in federal corporate income taxes in 2020 spent $450000000.00 on lobbying and political contributions in recent years. and that the company's paying 0 also received a $3500000000.00 in tax rebates, money that they can then turn around and spend to influence tax policy. you see how that works? that my friends in some good old fashion capitol hill? patriotism?

yes it is. but it wasn't just the big corporations, like fedex and charter communications who were flexing there, check writing patriotism. no, no, no. are good friends on wall street? yes. wall street. well, they were right there along with them as well. americans for financial reform reports, but in the 20192020 election cycle, wall street banks and financial services interest reported spending 29b with a b to influence decision making in washington. and that money. 1 my friends were spent on both the donald and sleepy. joe, they both got that money, so waive your flags, burn your brought fun, the grill, my fellow americans. because unless you've got the greenbacks that's about as close as you are ever ever going to get to true democracy here in the

united states. and that is why we are watching the hawks. if you want to know what's going on a city and you want to rush, let me show you what you are. the roy gross, right? math grade or heart, the late they make deceptive. manipulate so much put these weapons. so welcome everybody. to watching the hawks, i am hi robin, and i'm alicia cross. you know, i'm sure will all the other networks w w e to hell out of the upcoming meeting between joe biden and russian president vladimir putin. to me, this is the real story that we have because this directly affects us all the fact that most americans, if not all americans, except for a very small percentage, pay their taxes dutifully, but really they're not getting democracy back unless they got the green to

influence washington, that to me is what's more frightening than anything going on in the world today. you're right. and i think that that needs to be amplify more. we hear in the context of certain progressive leaders, how corporations aren't paying their fair share. what we don't here is how those corporations and those corporate leaders have basically funneled money into campaigns on both sides for very long time. and one of the reasons why they've been sheltered from tax reform is because it's hard to tag someone for their taxes when off the top. they've been paying you millions of dollars over time, basically to get exactly what they want. and it breaks my heart to because when you really get into these numbers like you, like i was saying at the top of the show, it's like they're also then getting rebates back and then using that money to turn around and influence washington more, it's like great so you don't pay any taxes, take money out of you and eyes and all of your pockets. and then use that money to then influence washington, so you don't have to pay any more taxes. it's an terribly ugly, vicious cycle. it's ugly and it continues it and again to you to your point,

it doesn't matter what side the elected officials on because these contributions are happening for republicans and democrats, i guess only people who don't benefit them from them are 3rd party candidate. but everyone else seems to be getting a piece of this bag and it's very hard to come back and employ any type of restrictions what you have provided for. and once you are basically getting phone calls from these corporations and these corporate leaders who have really funnel money to you for decades now and think that it's very important to continue to elevate just how much to the tune that these corporations feel as though they pretty much can do anything, you know, and elevating is the key word susan harley, the manager, director of public citizens congress watch division, she actually declared, spoke along what you're saying is, she said, quote, it's critical that the public understand that while paying nothing to support the upkeep of our government, these companies have been spending huge amounts of money to try to keep the game rigged in their favor. that's like something that everybody needs to be shouting from the mountain tops. because to me, you know, along with a lot of the institutional racism in this country,

the other things like that. but these are the things the terror away, the fabric of any kind of representative republic and making an a citizen in this nation. feel like they actually have a say in their government beyond the american idol, they vote for every 4 years. and that's why we'll never see camp true campaign finance reform and food lobbying reform. because at the end of the day, this is representative democracy that we have is largely funneled by corporate c o . 2 are making these backroom deals with elected officials again on both sides to create policy, the benefit them, not the policy of the people who actually voted to get them in office speaking a back room courtroom, a, c e o is the highest spender on wall street blackstone, c, e o. steven schwartz, mon spent more than $33000000.00 alone on campaign contributions. and now how can the average citizen compete steven clearly shortly, clearly getting a seat at the table when it comes to decide what happens in this country? no other? absolutely, if i pay 33000000 dollars, i'm expecting you to pick up the phone every time i call every time i call,

it doesn't matter what party they're going to be like, hey, buddy does what that 33000000. yeah. you bought a lot along, you bought a lot of yard signs with that 33000000. so oh me to call. no one can compete with that. and that's why i think that's crucial moving forward. this country has to, we as citizens, have to start demanding that kind of reform exactly. american democracy has been heralded around the world, the north star. that is until the perils of america failures to adhere to its own creed from a plain former president, trump and the g o. p. are still hard at work trying to devalue, disrupt, and spread lies about the election results. the 2020 presidential cycle in so doing this chapter of american democracy is unraveling with fail challenges aimed at states where voted the color tip appeals for the candid joe biden audits the bound conspiracy theory. the now water suppression bills designed to in the cornerstone of a democratic government voting access. to top it off, the january 6 insurrection was largely driven by ball claims of voter fraud. but

even though those issues put americas democracy in the international spotlight, according to a new piece by former congressman jesse jackson, junior american democracy, is quote, hobbling on one broken leg and drunk. the former congressman argues none of this is new and it isn't solely a trump air phenomenon, either a toxic combination of racism, right wing it. the ology and states rights create the we can democracy. we're in today. if jesse jackson junior is to be believed america, democracy has always been dysfunctional in one that honestly isn't a true democracy at all. he might be able to something america is defined by its racism, from slavery and jim crow laws to housing and banking in equity. and of course, police brutality, jackson junior, all of these truth years prior to talk the election, where multiracial voting rights were threatened, the state level, the right wing body politic has been attacking the right of people of color,

specifically black voters for decades. now, under the bale of states rights democrats have either been complacent or only use symbolism to try and stop the threat. jackson junior finds that progress toward racial equity, labor rights, and social justice is often at odds with speech rights roadblocks. these roadblocks undermine the core of a function, democracy leaving america one in name only if you are capable of becoming the democracy, it's health abroad. or are we doing by white supremacy and states rights policy, the institutionalize of hate? that's. that's a, that's a good question because when you look at the direction we're heading, i don't see it's turning that around and mostly because i don't see any real opposition from, from the left in a real way. i mean there, there's opposition from the left on an activist level, on a progressive love, but there's no real opposition. beyond like words salad. you're right. i think that

there is a rhetoric game here that is being played and i think wisely, by the advocates on the ground. but when it comes to democratic elected officials meeting time and time again. since basically african americans gain the right to vote where it has been threatened day in and day out. none of this is new and none of it is a trump era of reality. it's been going on for generation. and i think that to jesse jackson junior, who was my congressman, to his harsh critique of american democracy. i think he is on point here because as we go around the globe and how, how strong our democracy is and how america back, this is with the backdrop of more and more black people getting kicked off the boating roles that the backdrop of more and more election pulling places being shut down in black neighborhood. this is that the backdrop of a president, a former president and a party that still wants to believe and wants to spread the lie that the last election was stolen. even though i radically republican one, all the down ballot raises but the top of the picket their problem. and they got challenge largely in areas where the black boat was a deciding factor. so again, this is an issue that preceded trump,

but it's definitely one that became amplified on a world stage during the last presidential election. and to me, that's such an important distinction to make because i think it's very easy for, for washington d. c. politic right now to kind of fall back and look at the last 4 years of trump and say, well, that's all our problems now that he's gone, those problems won't exist anymore moving forward. and it becomes, you know, it's sad. i think that one of these things we're talking about specially voting rights and things like that. i don't want it to become like roe v wade for the right. you know, like where the right. i don't think they'll ever truly overturn roe v wade because it's a, it's a hook to get people out to boat. it gets their bass brought them out. who we got to vote and make sure democrats don't do that and we gotta overturn it. they're never gonna overturn it because it's a hook to get there based off the boat. and i worry that the left is now doing that, like, hey, keep voting for us. so we can try to get these states to get these votes back. you'll get these voting rights back, but we won't really try as hard as we want to to your point. i don't think that roe

v wade actually needs to be overturned at the supreme court level. at the end of the day, republicans are getting exactly what they want the state let us through with make like mississippi that only have one functioning abortion clinic for the entire things that are currently penalizing and providing criminal liability. 2 providers that are reducing, reducing access on a regular basis. they don't have to worry about the amount goes back to the states rights that you're talking about and how you give states too much weight to make these moral decisions. that creates a problem exactly my my mike issue with this is the larger argument here. we focus so much on the filibuster, which does need to be gotten rid of, got thrown by the wayside. it is also a, a relic of essentially apartheid against african american. what we also need to diminish or at least look at through a different lens, is states, right? because ask any black person in america states rights have been used to create a system that basically leaves black people a 2nd class citizen. since its inception, there is nothing good to be seen for states, right?

if you happen to be a person who is black or brown in this country, and to that point, i think that they have been able to get away with a lot of civil rights violations. based on the fact that they are their own independent. that's a really great point because i think originally, when people think of state rights, they don't think of it. like you said they got to reexamine. we look at the exciting when most people think of it's like, oh well yeah, state should figure out what highway is it needs to build a better support as population. what schools need to be put in what area it shouldn't be left up to the federal government. do that, and that's all fine. but it's when it crosses over into that area that you're talking about. but suddenly it takes that ugly turn. you will wait a minute that we don't need to leave morality up to an individual state. they shouldn't be able to decide who can booked. they shouldn't be able to decide who can get married. they shouldn't be able to decide, fundamentally who have the right to own a home in which neighborhood, and we're seeing that happen. and we're seeing these restrictions get elevated on a daily basis as it relates to the blacking and browning of the country. great point already is are, as we go to break, remember that you can also start watching your on demand to the brand new portable

tv app, which is available on all platforms and got no excuse to go out downloaded, check it out. all right, coming up we delve into the ransomware crisis. that is making headline after headline and then we dive into be constitutional controversy over the us pledge of allegiance. you do not want to miss this. stay tuned to watching the hawks ah ah. well, the sanction rarely was rarely work except maybe a week, maybe a month when the world always figures a way to get around the fact whether it's whatever it is that was anxious, don't work. politicians get publicity, and they say, see,

i am saving the world. they're saving themselves and they're making friends, which one of the worst ever mass shootings in america was in las vegas in 2017. the tragedy a close a little of the real last vegas where many say elected officials are controlled by christina learners. the vegas shooting revealed what the l v n p d really is. and now it's part of the stem machine. most of the american public barely remembers that happened just shows you the power of money and las vegas. the powerful showed that true colors when the pen demik had the most contagious contagion that we've seen in decades. and then you have a mayor who doesn't care. so here's caroline goodman, offering the lives of the vegas residence. to be the control group to the shiny facades conceal a deep indifference to the people. why is going to be saved if they were to take an

action? absolutely, keep the registering and keep the slot machines doing. this is a money machine is a huge cash register that is ran by people who don't care about people's lives being lost. the me, the newest form of terrorism is benefited greatly by a broken grid system and computer networks that make breeches as easy and enticing is making an ice cream sundae. cyber terrorism and ransomware are making headlines in america where the attacks are becoming more frequent and the cash demands continue to grow. cyber security has been a talking point since the internet exploded in the mid ninety's and cries grew stronger in the early 2, thousands. yet here we are in 2021 and fiber security standards are pretty much nonexistent. breach of them banking have gone on for years. it most recently,

we see cyber attacks against the colonial pipeline resulting in gas, ga, follow by solar, wind, and meet supplier j b. s. these breaches served as a fire alarm fire with millions being paid to hackers and leaving us law enforcement out of its depth. some elected officials have argued just stop paying the ransom in the same vein. they say america doesn't negotiate with terrorists. but what can corporations do when they are attacked? are there avenue currently available to to them aside from paying one security firm, tracking ransomware attacks estimated that there were 65000 successful breaches in 2020 alone. in fact, during the colonial pipeline breach, homeland security secretary alejandro. my org is estimated that $350000000.00 in ransom payments were handed out to engaging in ransomware plot. over the past year . ransomware attacks involve malware been encrypt files onto a device or companies network, making it in operable criminal. then the main ransom in bitcoin,

or some form of crypto currency without buy parts and reforms, or cybersecurity systems, and public private partnerships to protect the grid system. more attacks. more money and greater threats are coming. international president of high crime technology investigation association, todd shipley joined us now with more welcome thought. welcome. thank you. thought we know that ransom, we were attacked or shaping up to be the new $911.00 with implications from water and gas and security, and mash or just hospitals in transport. why do you think we're seeing greater instances of ransomware and what can the us do to prevent them? while we're seen, part of the increase in ransomware because it's so effective for the bad guys to attack our systems. define weaknesses, because we're all susceptible to the problem in the mail comes in and we see something that looks like it should be something we need to respond to. we click on a link, fill out a form, download a pdf file, and also now we are the access to

a company. and that causes so much problems for the smaller companies in the beer companies. now, because there's no ability to stop it, because we constantly get into our email accounts, these kinds of emails, trying to persuade us to click on a link and it's just, you know, tremendously a problem. got fiber crimes in the need for stronger cybersecurity standards have been a talking point here in washington, dc for years. why? why haven't, we've seen a substantial movement on capital hill and what needs to be in a policy that could actually protect corporations and smaller businesses from ransomware attacks? well, i think part of the problem is always been that you know, the i t function, the information technology function within companies has always been a, you know, not a profit center for the companies. so they don't put the funding in that needs to go there. and there isn't legislation that requires them to do that. i think what

we're going to end up seeing if we end up having hearings on this topic, we're going to have some sarbanes oxley kind of, you know, law pass that forces these, you know, c suite personnel to actually take the seriously. because if we look back on things like sony from a number years ago, we saw that they didn't take it seriously and they got attacked. and we haven't seen it being really taken seriously by most companies up to, and even colonial, where they didn't have things in place that should have prevented this simple kind of attack with some, you know, software that detects these kinds of things. and they didn't, habit and taught, should corporations pay, we know that the colonial pipeline did meet supplier j b. s did as have others, but in 2019, the teamsters were hit with ransomware and they refuse to pay and took a totally different approach. what is the difference in these cases? well, i think if you look at the, the, some of the companies haven't paid, and there's been a number of them that haven't,

they don't make the news because they get back their data. they've either backed it up correctly, or they, they move forward and, you know, re, you'd build the data. the problem is a lot of these companies haven't sufficiently backed up their data to cover themselves. if something like this happens in, you know, ip people, security people like me, have been seen for years back up, back up, back up, and make sure that you got backups off site so that they can't be affected. but apparently these companies are doing that, you know, that's the simplest fix to do this. another thing is i think that the government needs to come up with some guidelines on what they need to do. we've done that within the government because if you remember in the mid to thousands how many times the u. s. government was attacked, the army was getting attacked and they had to change how they looked at their functions and put a lot of red teams in place that were actually going out there and looking at at their, their computers. i think we need to start looking better at a lot of the these companies and how they're actually doing their protection to make sure that they're putting things into place properly. we only got about

a minute left, but i want to ask you this as, as the cyber terrorists become more advanced, you know, and whether they're working on behalf of nation states, or are, you know, subnational terrorist groups, or, or just simply criminals. just trying to get a get a bit coin, buck, where i gotta ask, where is like an essay and all of this and things like that because don't we have, it isn't the same national security agency isn't there the one we should be out actually stopping this from happening and then protecting our shores the way we've been told they're capable of doing well, you would hope so, and i, and i hope this week when you know, president biden present food and get together, they have this conversation about this very thing. because right now we've not done those offensive projects that i think we should like. you're suggesting the units they do, i think we need to look at that kind of thing. i mean, we could even go to the extreme and, and issue letters of mark to the hackers to stop some of this stuff. but you're right, the essays there. why are they doing what they need to be doing?

they should be, it seems like they spend more time spying on all of us than actually doing their thank you very much for joining us today. mr. shipley, looking forward to having you on the future. thank you. have a good day. as i mentioned at the top of the show here in the united states between the end of may and memorial day holiday and the 4th of july, the us independence day celebration we are, we here in the us are in the holiday season, the patriotism. so it's only fitting that as we and the show today to look at one more. one of the more controversial uses of language in what's considered one of the oldest acts of patriotism here in the u. s. and that my friends is reciting the pledge of allegiance while it's not mandatory. the pledge in its current form has been recited by us school children across the nation since 1954. and it goes, i pledge of allegiance to the flag of the united states of america to the republic, for which it stands, one nation under god, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all will. joining us now to discuss the constitutionality of the controversial line of one nation under god in the pledge

is legal and media analysts. line l. lydell. well, there's a lot to be argued about about having school children recite a pledge of allegiance on a daily basis. you and many others feel that including the phrase, one nation under god is unconstitutional. enlightened our viewers and why you believe this? and i'm the only one apparently who thinks that let me explain a couple of things. first, friends, if you want to spend some great time learning the history of this flag, did you know that there were various iterations of the pledge in particular, not the flight, but the pledge. and there was one, the one that we know is the bella, me pledge, this was a christian socialist. never mentioned god at all. and let me tell you what the bellamy pledge was. can i do this for you? this is watch because we all do this, right? you don't want to bellamy pledge was this. now, this was okay until the twenty's, when they said it. and you could maybe flip your hand up or down. but it did all

these kids standing up by pleasurably. so that was the bell and pledge so i mean, just the iterations of this in 1954 today. dwight eisenhower sign the under god edition, 2 years after, in god we trust trust on all paper currency, the official motto, why? i don't know. now there are 2 provisions of the 1st amendment that we must, as to religion, the establishment clause, and the free exercise clause in violence, right? the free exercise clause, congress shall passion a law that affects the free exercise of your faith unless it pay oh, the snake handling. no father, things like that. certain drugs we don't like. but other than that yet in general. now, the establishment clause doesn't necessarily mean the establishment of like in the pisca ball church, you know, the church of england. it means friends when the government endorses

ratify or passing judgment on the validity of a faith. if on our coinage we had, there is no god, god is false or, and you go that would also in my mind be unconstitutional. even though i might personally agree with my, my thoughts me nothing. because the government violates the establishment clause. i love you on the validity of it. i love it, and that's too great point. and i want to have you back on later this week to continue this discussion on patriotism in this please line. i'll thank you so much for illustrating the differences between the 2. brilliant ard everybody. that is our show for you today. and remember in this world we are definitely not told we are loved enough, so i tell you all i love you. i am robin and i'm nice across. keep on watching all those hawks and have a great day and night. everybody ah,

look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, accept where's the short or conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. at the point obviously is too great truck rather than fear i was like, take on various jobs with artificial intelligence real summoning the demon a robot must protect its own existence with the media, a reflection of reality in

a world transformed what will make you feel safer tyson lation community, are you going the right way? where are you being that somewhere? direct is true. what is faith in the world corrupted? you need to this end. ah. so join us in the depths all remained in the shallows. ah, we are in miami for a big boy. 4041. back to safety were at the 1st born conference in broad, 2011. there were about 40 or 50 people there. here in miami, they got 12000 tickets, all the router, some estimate, 184-5000 absolute,

mad out. a sick want to get set to go global, take over the global economy and put all the circle back out of business. the no stability or predictability from america. let me put in regrets. the state of relationship with the u. s. in an interview with n b c, a head of his 1st summit of president button. that's is how stability is achieved. it cannot be achieved by imposing one particular point to the correct point of view by an intern calls a put in a worthy adversary, yet avoid giving a direct answer as to whether he still thinks put in as a killer and joe biden promises half a 1000000000 doses of cobra jobs for poor nations, but it seems they won't be available for everybody.