we think he might be a soldier because of the booty wearing your twitched up took a personal opinion was little on this. you're still writing, please please. ah ah ah ah hello and welcome to cross stock. are all things considered? i'm peter lavelle, the prudent biking summit, his coming gone by his real message on his european tour with his galvanized

washington's outlines into some kind of anti china alliance. did he succeed also the january 6 right? the f b i and the ark of history. ah, he discussed these issues and more and joined by my guess, jordan, samuel, we in budapest, he is the podcast or at the goggle, which can be found on youtube rumble and locals. and here in moscow were joined by dmitri bobbitt. she is a political analyst and editor at me, internet media project or a gentleman cross capitols in effect, that means you can jump anytime you want and i always appreciate it. okay, that's good to start off with being my here in moscow as well and team and you and i and george discussed the content of what we were going to do on this program yesterday. and you sent me an email with some comments and you said we should

handle this program. china, europe's unwanted enemy. why did you suggest that that was very interesting. go ahead. well, it's absolutely clear that the european country, yes, especially germany, which has a huge economic dice, you know, to china and east european countries away. absolutely. do not want to have a confrontation with china. these countries are not interested in the anti chinese, the rhetoric and war, chinese actions, which are basically forced on them by washington. i mean, some of these countries don't have to be persuaded to be anti russian. i think it was a huge mistake. you know, when the russian foreign policy for many years states that somehow the united states is more hostile to ration than the european union. there are some countries in eastern europe, which are certainly more at russia than, than the united states. but they don't want to fight china and when, at the last,

the recent nature meeting sharing, that was the fact to declare in any way, let me quote that china stated the visions. sergio behavior present. systemic jen and just are the rules based international or the as errors relevant to natal security and of called him made those language that means chinese and him because cool presents david chen and just and also it's a big lie because in what way can china throughout the nato, i mean military military in nature as many times stronger than china and chinese cases in the completely different part of the world. and china during the last, at least 40 years, china did not invade the congress. it did not take any territory under his control, it did not do more critize, a foreign nation. it was not involved,

nation building and steal, you know, chinese viewed us hostile by the state. and certainly it reminded me of the situation that we saw during world war 2. well, now to germany, awful allies in europe such as italy, such as congress, but just been live, they were not interested in the outside your would you and then establishing german hold on. i mean, feels want to take that was, i was really, there is next to that what they didn't want to take learning crap. you know, deleon's want to do have some part of greek territory and they wanted to cut you slot a site, but they didn't want to die on the whole purpose for my job is for the beans to participate in the see job. any group and germans forced to die. we're starting up so that when you, when you're surrounded, hostile ideology doing with every medical you, what would you say got a lot more than they bargained for rules based order. we just read that quote,

george, i wonder who wrote that down the rules based order door. ok, no, that would be one of the things i wanted to do this george, because i think it's very, very interesting. number one, joe biden is present. america is back. well, not everybody wants it, even with it within the, your a, p and union within nato. want once america back the way it was before and see what's happening in the way i look at it is huge. cleavage is big, it's very small now, but it's going to grow and grow and grow because the us is the master of nato undoubted. okay, what they want they get. okay. european union is different. ok, you can, you can have this threat. inflation is imaginary threat. we have to spend all this money because of the russian threat, but when it comes that you cannot mix here a little bit more hard headed and sober, okay. and just as demon pointed out, i mean, why are we completing these all things together? and then trying to the on the obvious end, it's not obvious whatsoever. go ahead,

george. i don't think there are many issues. there's without question. what's the issue that nato is continually looking for a new role. so it would be one step ahead of because, you know, thinking about what's the next rent that we can just buy our convenient existence. but the communicate that was issued, the other day was still basically focused on russia, russia, i mean, the paragraph off the bar about all the terrible things. russia is done. all the terrible press of russia, russia's cheating, russia, violating this and so on. so yes, china is mentioned, but that comes down to like paragraph, 50 bible, something and the language is much more circumspect. you know? yes, china, a challenge really have to look up on it. but then the china is cooperating really generally with russia. that's it. that's the point, george,

don't you think? i mean, because nature is essentially just a propaganda operation. ok. and so it slowly but surely there, it's the overhead window all over again, getting essentially what they want to do. one way china with russia, they want to see them is inseparable. right? actually, the more they do that, no more russia guy will come together with these people don't seem to have any near sighted understanding. well, it's very, it's very much like these 2 powers of threats to the rules base order. and they even mention of like, well, china is a challenging the values based washington treaty, the treat that set up. so there is a, now there's a question. the united states sees china as a major geo political rival. it's an emerging economic giant. and the united states really doesn't like it because they feels the china will become the economic and

financial power in the world. in the, in the coming decades that will be the end of the dollar's role in the well system . so yes, no question. i mean, this happens already on the obama, much more, some of the trunk. you know, the united states wants to pitch the hostility towards china, but the europeans, they are essentially a regional power. they're all regionals. they don't think globally, i mean, yeah. russia, they can think about the history there. and of course, as dba, pointed out to me, of those, all of those states that are absent, rabidly, anti rush in the baltic states and poland. they can't really get wrapped their heads around china. i mean, china is nowhere near europe. and so it's very hard for them to go along with this, even though the united states. but our question is trying to push them in this direction. you know, again, if we make the job position to the cold war, there was virtually no trade between the west and the soviet union. i mean,

it was just as one of the conditions here and, but there's no cold war. we can use that term that washington wants to push the european store visa be china. well, they, china is be use biggest trading partner. okay. and again, we can go about, you know, a breads that are bad and all that. but trade is not a very bad, a real ok. and europe, as a company is trying to pull itself out of this. pandemic needs tray, and china was very much well good. they can have it both ways. the same. what, why do you have to have it both ways at the same time and completely impractical? well, what you don't keep saying will make russia pay the price, you know, that was their slogan for many years. now it looks like 1st they made the, you pay the price because it wasn't the stage where post sanctions on russia and

for whom these sanctions are really, really painful. it was the eel, which has, which is the biggest trading part. no, russia who more billions, you know, at least bon billions for most on the, on the and russian sanctions in the 1st year, you know, and later there were more and more horses so that you will pay the price. and with china, that price is going to be several times higher than with russia. but you know, it's a lesson you have to learn from history when he would join an aggressive extremist by georgia. and unfortunately, the people like victoria knew the people like john brandon. they have an extremist at the moment when you use with them your rules, you should prepare for huge osis of all. and obviously i want the nice states to help them rush. and besides that, that was their idea. they wanted to be strong, you know, with united states because of, okay,

they were not states behind them. and they're not, the states is now canceling. they are possibly like serious deals with china. that's what is happening. you know, and with greece, it's a moral guess because greece is bay very much the with chinese can on. they sold them several of their ports, you know, in greece. so in did is going to be painful. and the problem is that this is the price or ideology. and also this is the price of flights. i mean, look at the way american liberal press covered by the me is it, you know, i almost woman that the washington post max boot by the why? the smoke of space by them knew how to deal with the kremlin strong when he did it much better than trump was seen. but then call it. i mean, the whole idea of present in by the median a, some kind of a boxing match,

which joe has to stand up to laugh, you know, that's so stupid. but that was the, the main people, the media in the last 2 weeks. yeah, i mean, john, i didn't, i didn't realize it, max boot rice for the babylon b or the onion because i read the article. thank you. deem presenting to me is completely satirical. i mean, if you didn't know better, you'd say this is a joke, right? yeah, yeah, well i think the, the big like mag boots have a problem on their hands. they spent the last. 1 5 years, making these claims that trump is a trade, the trump is selling out the country. trump is working in trump is trees in the any, any or just by, from toward russia even even what he's imposing sanctions were what he's picking out is really secretly applaud by the throw us off the same so that they've been battling this idea. now they have bite and

then you know, they rejoice from the defeat is or is there any being friendly? of course the russian truck was double back and come up with some convoluted nonsense as to why it's ok when biting. does it terrible when in front of it? so in the last 25. thank you, george. if trumpet had the same exact summit with he would be a traitor. by having the way his experience is a noble democratic diplomatic leader. if it's the x boot does actually show the incredible bias and how dangerous that bias is when it comes to american foreign policy. it's, it's all about their perceptions and the echo lima, their ideology. i gentlemen, i'm going to jump in here. we're going to go to a short break and ask about your break book in the, in our discussion and some real estate, or rather driven by dreamers

shaped by those with the in me. ah, who dares think me, we dare to ask me when i was wrong. why don't i just don't i need you to fill out the thing because after an engagement equals the trail, when so many find themselves will depart. we choose to look for common ground

in look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except when the shorter, in that conflict with the 1st law show your identification, we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. the point obviously is to create truck rather than fear i would take on various jobs with artificial intelligence, real summoning the demon a robot must protect its own existence. was the welcome to cross that are all things

considered? i peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing some real news and this is the home edition. the alright, let's go back to georgia in budapest, georgia because it slowly but surely being revealed as we approached the january 6 trials, i mean, hundreds of people potentially are going to go on trial here. and it's being revealed that a lot of there is a lot of unnamed co conspirators and, well people were wondering, hire their names redacted and is it because they had contact with the authorities to be f b i specifically. and that is very, very trembling. but what's even more troubling is that the legacy liberal liberal media points to the bank? are you saying? well, you must be a conspiracy conspiracy. there is for asking those questions. the media won't ask

those questions where left to ask those questions? go ahead. george. yeah, it's very interesting because what happened this week is a southern sea change in the story of the events of january the same. and here reminds me of what happened, some point in 2017, with the trump russia story when debbie nunez suddenly disclose that the f b. i. so valence warren, of cause or page, was based entirely on the steel. don't be a missile. the shocking disclosure and of course, the legacy media and all the pundits and all the x, f, b i and c. i was actually nonsense from spirit garrett. this is not how the f b, i operate does not the operate. this is total total. and then we got the inspector general report and pretty much confirmed everything that devin knew.

something similar happened this week with this story in revolving news and then call them to get out and then significantly blend greenville. and it's now really very serious question, which is there are that there are always people mention in the indictments, uninvited co conspirators. and then mysterious person, one person to person 3 group for some reason. even even though, according to the charging sheets, they played a very active role in the events of genuine. for some reason, they haven't been invited. so therefore the next question is raised. to what extent did the f b i know what was going to happen, who you are most there is a extent was the f b i itself actively involved in instigating those events in driving those and in actually causing that arrive to take place. whereas the people who actually were there on washington on that they didn't want this riot story. and of course as

you say, the legacy media is gone haywire. how can you get these people haven't or trials if they cannot say well, so you can say is name person a. ok? how could? but that's my, that's my alibi, that's my rooms. this is the contact i had them. no, no, no. the state says you cannot reveal the name that is a kangaroo deem of the thing that is. so i think, you know, because so much happened over the last few years, isn't it? people, again, prior to trump going down the us later, we could buy that is a benchmark, is that the press had and lee a pri, can have been added to the adversarial relationship when the intelligence community with the, with the cia fast forward to today. they are covering up for them every step of the way that you can not interrogate the people in power. it is terrifying and for

people thinking about it because i mean, i have monitors at work i see as being at an end. but some you think there are, i mean it's all january thinks, i mean if they're building up to something here and it looks like there is a major a cover up, we need to learn more. but i mean, this is very, very distracted by the media is just merely the mouthpiece for the people that they were, you know, technically, professionally supposed to keep an eye on. go ahead. well, that's why i call president obama that was president in us history. you know, it was on his watch and, you know, formally he was a democrat, you know, almost 11 just president. it was under his watch that f, b, i and some special services started to be directly involved in the elections and, and they were questions about elections and about their agent use to patients. it became clear that these people are there is one point i think,

which is important here in our president. would you mention the january 6 storage? please press one. and i know that some people on the left don't ask the states to get bad. we've had some criticism from peter coasting, for example. i think, well, you mentioned that he was not the right to spend or that have to stand just it's a feeling of many people in rush. i remember 1993. you know, that was the last, i've been something like january 6, captain in russia. and of course, we do it very badly when we saw this man, you know, a lot of the security people who just showed that the woman who was not, you know, was not threatening him, was probably misbehaving. but he bought in full blood just shot her dad. and there was this video and now people gauge in 1520 years, even though they did not current any one and the almost are not involved in

violence. that's why when russia taken it, but it has nothing to do with the russians being pro republican or democrat, you know they, they don't think that way. ok. but george, i mean, actually, babbitt, i mean, you know when that what, there's 14000 hours of footage and they were told we've seen snippets of it. and some of it from what i have seen encounter contradicts the narrative that the liberal of legacy medias portraying of what happened there. but it seems to imply the prosecutors need a lot of extra time. okay. it seems to me that either, you know, they have a blockbuster case or they have no case at all. okay. and they're trying to create one because we never find out how ashley. but babbitt died then this whole thing is a bars from beginning to end. yeah. yeah, it really is. and now you mentioned the 14000 hours of

footage, we could even the defense counsel on behalf of the $480.00 defendants are not getting access to the sportage. and we can be pretty sure that, you know, given the politicization of the d o, j, that if this port age was really damaging to the, the riot as we would have been seeing a lot more of this, not at the moment, the things that we do see, people pass around on twitter, youtube, or whatever. as you say, they go against the narrative, we get strange characters, bellowing outside, so mechanical soul, mechanical. and they will be told by the writers themselves. you know, he's in the book, he's, he's, he's f b i, he's an instigator, why of annapolis and why the bus was saying like, after why ever you've been indicted and then you've got to gain the questions like, what about the leaders, elise,

why supremacy groups like the proud boys and the oath keepers of the 3 percent of the ones that christopher ray and the other is always going on about how come none of the leaders has been. 2 indicted over this, i mean they supposed to take part in those events. so i haven't been backwards raising all of the suspicions. and then we got the ashley bobbitt, which is we're not even finding out who the person was who shot and why did he do it? from what i think lean from what people have been saying, they know who the officer in the name has been mentioned on the, on the internet. so but, but the, my, this, this goes to such a bigger, broader point. because in the way that the narrative of january 6 is being presented like pearl harbor 911. if there isn't full disclosure, there isn't all transparency. there will be parallel, narrative that will live for a very, very long time. the can not be reconciled. ok,

and this is my biggest worry, and i think the, it's the media is driving. it is driving it all steam ahead because it is still litigating and judging the trump presidency with a trump resides in their brain and there's nothing they can do about it. we, we thought with the recent as well, and, you know, so when the man leads the stage is taken off of bob warm, he's still the most powerful boston american brother building. it's incredible. go ahead. fast. i would like to remind our viewers that on the day one, when it's happened, we said on this program that of course, these attack against would not be justified if it was a crime, it was inexcusable. the other problem, the other question is the reaction of the state and the so called investigation and

how all of these turned into and you'll rice, dog fi and you know, right there fire, if you remember, no one now even find it. now, if it was that dutch call me just indeed would needed, or if he claimed, or maybe it was most likely provocation or not just what happened played, was much worse than the what happened during that, that event, you know, what happened later was basically a more of a follow up by one party and we suddenly have 90 percent of us media strongly described by the and not expressions of us over very significant part of the american you ation. and the end, the service consequence is the fact the bond part of american hates and the, it was not russia. who did it, i mean, away bidding the r i could see george laughing. but you know, the outside forces and all this is going to be, you know,

it's going to be a drama. they needed to be a drama thing. and it's actually, and we look at, look at rush gay in corral. the progressives. ok to keep the democratic coalition together. they will do where they get their branding. another narrative to corral their give, bring elements of their coalition to keep them cohesive. ok, as jo ain't doing such a great job at the end of the day. go ahead. short one minute, you know, question is going to be midterm elections next year at the moment it looks like, you know, we'll look at the backings and history of the democrats will suffer losses. we can be absolutely certain that it will be a russia alone. that would be blame for any democratic losses. i mean, it's just, it's, it's automatic. and that's and booty said this during is news conference. what is that? well, are you optimistic? it says, well, i don't know, i mean, it's very hard to predict the dynamics of american politics. so we really have no

idea how, what by the did. so yeah, there's no question though, the russian involvement will play a role. but you know, if we do find out that the f b, i itself was actively involved in the events of john, you the 6, then i think we're into a serious ball game. and then i think the legacy media will step in and say, this is all a very boring story. let's move on my map. no gentlemen, and one of my get some good, a past year, and i want to thank you for watching us. here are the scenic, remember the oh, i use always be polite, never engage with an aggravated or potations officer. the

don't get into any conversation to start answering questions. just ask for an attorney. to survive and interrogation, you've gotta be ready to stand your ground. definitely don't want to be going to trial in a jump, so one cups you're more likely to walk free. if you're rich and guilty, you are. if you're poor you got 2 eyes and 2 ears and one mouth. so you should be seeing and hearing a whole lot more than you're saying, if you don't take that advice, usually going to dig yourself a whole join me every thursday on the alex simon show. when i was speaking to guess in the world, the politics, sport, business and show business. i'll see you then. in

the moon, the ah, dozens of criminal cases are opened on hundreds of web pages removed. russia tech old had trade and fake vaccine certificates. a reporter phone dollars, the risk of trying to obtain one for himself. so they put all the information that i gave them, the faith name, date of birth. let's face it. i was scammed and i've lost my money. public opinion, a split over 2 statues of george floyd recently unveiled for june, 18th news, federal holiday marketing, the.