we think he might be a soldier because off the boot she's wearing your twitched up, took a personal opinion was on this. you're still summarizing, please, please. i i bought these top stories, global stability, fiber attacks, regional conflicts and nato on the table for a major international security conference. here in moscow. the government comm decide, unilaterally which websites they don't like journalists tracks in the united states . dozens of media website domains linked to iran, claiming that behind this information campaign criminal oh victim. a french woman who says she lived in terra for decades is on trial for murdering her husband. the

campaign is that little protection in cases of domestic violence, that report reveals that suicides by us veterans of the war on terror. 4 times higher than combat test. we hear from one form i hello, wednesday afternoon at 5 here in moscow. my name is colleen bray. welcome to you. we'll do a sort of asi, international, big story. we're across today that a top level international security conference is underway in moscow, tackling everything from cybersecurity to regional conflicts and also nato. the annual event brings together defense ministers and experts from around the globe. more than $600.00 are expected to discuss the most pressing security and stability concerns right now. the russian president lead off by saying that there are still many global challenges, and one of them is that some countries are trying to change the world order that

has been established since the end of the 2nd world war latimer food and also with stress that russia is going to keep strengthening its military potential and improve military capabilities, but he's going to do this carefully, not to disrupt the global strategic stability. so let's have a listener when you're sure, but we will do everything to guarantee the peace and security of the russian people to improve around forces. and of course, by means of diplomacy to lead a meaningful dialogue with all interested partners. clearly, we are concerned by the continued build up of nato military potential and infrastructure near russia's borders. as well as the fact that the airlines declines to constructively consider our proposals to de escalate tensions and reduce the risk of unpredictable incidence. and we hope that common sense and the desire to develop a constructive relations with us will eventually prevail russian defense minister,

i assure good who is also one of the key participants of this conference, said that there is a great chance that of gannett stan will descend into civil war, once again after us troops pull out and he lamented the fact that washington has show no desire to work with russia to prevent this from happening. but he attributed much of that to the rest of phobia that unfortunately has prevailed among vast military and political leads in the west. i guess it speaks volumes that none of the native representatives have decided to come to moscow for these conference. despite being invited, the united states has seized more than 30 media website domain names linked to iran for what it calls this information campaigns becomes a call summit rising tensions between the 2 nations. we heard from the international federation of journalists, which criticize the bit of highlighting that other methods should have been used.

the blocking by the us. so websites run by groups affiliated with the run is the wrong way to deal with. so cold disinformation. while real journalism requires the respect of solid ethical principles and full independence from governments, we cannot accept but governments unilateral decide which websites they don't like to shut down. thus challenging freedom of speech. the ban on our website reveals once again the falsehoods of the slogan, so freedom of expression and all the other headlines promoted by the united states of america, including the inability to confront the truth. one of the websites that was seized is run by the who is easy, that is fighting against saudi arabia and has long been accused by the united states being iranian proxies. the other website that was seized is of iranian origin, and the other website press tv is that is that iran's official english language news outlet, the primary voice of iran to the english speaking world, important to take the context into accounts. now we have joe biden and his

ministration that have been in office since earlier this year. that he talks about reopening the iran nuclear deal of criticize the trump administration handling of us relations with iran. but we've just had an election in iran itself in which we have a new president who is quite critical of his predecessor ronnie and his negotiations with the united states. so we have a new administration sent to come into office in iran, we have a new administration united states and the contacts and the moment of this is quite interesting. well, last hour i spoke to journalist robert in la cash to contribute to one of the network targeted to press tv. he says that if us media sites receive, the global reaction will be rather different. even with american websites in american news outlets. i mean, iran is often criticized and bastard as a country which doesn't allow freedom of speech. yet. when abraham gracie was elected,

some of the 1st news outlets which were allowed to come and ask questions and were able to have their media. there were american news outlets. could you imagine that in the united states press tv was one of the 1st outlets, which is allowed to ask a question to president joe biden when he was elected. i'm it is very unlikely. i don't think that we will see this in the foreseeable future. i mean, even the left side now has been taken down in the united states. so if an american used outlet is targeted, we'd see everyone jump on. but when it comes to a foreign news outlets, or what would be an enemy state of the united states, suddenly there is a silence. and a sort of complicity here when it comes to looking at the issue and almost sort of a justification of this being of press tv and other websites being taken down. people should have the freedom to say what they want. and especially in the united states, which constantly talks about freedom of speech and the values of freedom of speech . a french woman has gone trial this week for murdering her husband,

valerie book, who faces a possible life sentence, but says she did it to protect herself and her 4 children. well, then half a 1000000 of already signed a petition in her support. charlotte to ben's game paris picks up the story. it's a trial that his grip follows with hundreds of 1000 signing a petition for her release. valerie, but cool, admit she shot, said her husband, and buried his body in the woods in defense. she claims that he was abusive and she feared for the safety of their children. in a book she wrote about her relationship with daniel to let. she described the mistreatment. i did what he said. i didn't have much choice. what he thought i was doing something i shouldn't do. he was violent at 1st was slabs. then he started kicking me and strangling me over time there came threats with a firearm. but valerie buck, who had been gone much earlier,

paulette was originally in a relationship with her mother. he then started sexually abusing valerie becca when she was just 12, a crying he was late to sent to jail for on his release to return to the family home. and he abuse resumes at 17. she was pregnant with paulette child. she alleges that he later forster into prostitution watching a she had sex with client when the client asked the price, daniel told me to repeat, it said that he could hear better. and he told me to answer yes or no. on the same valerie but co shot her husband, she told the court the paulette had about 14 year old daughter and how she was sexually when prob, she said that she had been afraid that he would also sell her body for sex. and valerie buck, who is trial, which is currently under way, lawyers will argue that she was a woman pushed to kill,

to survive. these women who are victims of violence have no protection. the judiciary, still too slow, not very active enough into lenient towards the perpetrators who could continue to exercise their violent power prosecution, while alleges valerie buck, who killed her husband in a pre meditated act, which carries a maximum life pension in front. this trial shines a light on domestic violence in a country with one of europe's highest weights of women who being killed by a current or a former partner, 55 losing their lives already this year. that's led to an our poor ring of anger. which campaign is demanding action? when did you was point is not to blame the police, prosecutors or child welfare services. this is a failure of the whole system. and acknowledging this helps to improve support from

victims and to prevent domestic violence and fem asides, which are the most extreme form of violence. the last day, the french government did respond with new legislation, including for the emergency measures to keep violent abuses from approaching the victims. critics say though, that the measures have been implemented to slowly charlotte the sky off the paris well, health organizations flagged up lapses at a sputnik v koby vaccine manufacturing facility and central russia. the w h o has so far looked into 4 sites out of 7 after russia reply to register, supposed to be in europe. heliotrope and drank had told me most v 7 existing sputnik b factories, a total of 4, which is more than a half, have been inspected by the officials. a, b, w, h o. and there were only complaint found at one single production site in

far, which included issues with data and test results and things like issues with lap conditions. now, according to the russian government, all these concerns and issues have been fully dealt with me as to indeed that had been complaints from the inspection team. as far as we know, everything has already been taken into account and what needed to be changed has already been changed. according to the russian government. the reason why everything was fixed so quickly is that the authorities from russia's ministry of industry and trade had been aware of the preliminary reports by the w h show. and so to say began doing their homework in advance. and already, at this point, the inspectors from the world health organization have been invited back to far to check how their concerns have been dealt with. officials in moscow are also stressing that the complaints about this one single production site in no way

undermine the positive conclusions about the effectiveness and quality of the sputnik v. jap, the international recognition of the washing made vaccine has been somewhat of a tricky issue in this country has been claimed many times that we have fallen victim to politics. because while in more than 60 countries around the world politically has been given the green light, it has not been approved for used by the european medical agency, for example, and the world health organization as well. but with everything now, being fixed in the russian officials are hoping that this could be the next major step to full international recognition of sputnik be developing story across the russian defense ministry says its fire warning shots after a british destroyer entered its waters of correspond, mariah guys, d as across this forest, more at high, these kind of intercepts, naval and air real happen all the time. but this seems like

a pretty big deal. what do we know? well, we, we know that the incident occurred at 11 52 am. when the british destroy entered russia's territorial waters. it was immediately warned by radio to change courts that it had entered russian territorial waters and violet. the, the, the, the shore apparently ignored the warnings after which a russian patrol boat carried out warning shots of the just just off the side of the british warship, russian jet then dropped full bombs. allegedly, along the course of the british destroy, it eventually left russia's terrible waters off the full minutes inside them. the russians have said that this is clearly provocative behavior. they have said that this is a violation of the un convention of law of the seas and have southern the british military has actually had the british ambassador, the odds of the actions of the age of s,

defender. the dangerous actions of the royal navy destroy, have been assessed by the russian defense ministry of the gross violation of the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea. the russian military cooled on the british side to conduct a thorough investigation into the actions of the h. m. s. defend the crew to prevent similar incidents in the future. britain version of events is very different. they say that they were travelling peacefully, selling peacefully through an internationally recognized groups. so they, they didn't say where they end to rush and waters rushes territorial waters which they of course, britain recognizes ukrainian territorial waters off the coast of crimea, which they also recognise as ukrainian. they say that no warning shots were fired, new bombs were dropped along their roof. they say that the russians were carrying out some military exercises. they warned them about somewhere, but the nothing of the sort the russian describes happened. the royal navy ship is

conducting innocent passage through ukraine in territorial waters in accordance with international law. no shots were directed at h. m. f defends, and we did not recognize the claim. the bombs were dropped in her path. it may well be that the british shore cut a corner through russia's territory waters as it was traveling from a death. so you crave to georgia and brushes, territory waters off along the roots again, water that they recognize as ukrainian but russia has long voiced the concern in recent years about heightened nato activity in the black sea. they say that almost of the permanent basis there are natal worships now operated in the black sea and these are sophisticated worships with precise weapons, long range missiles abroad. and these worships generally specialize in anti air and anti ballistic missile activity. curious, well,

let's keep watch on it for us. we'll be back with you for now over, i guess, dan, thank you ext, controversial brain chip. technology might sound like science fiction, but it's gained increasing attention over the years with countries developing programs to explore, implanting microchips into people's brains. at recent reports in the russian media about the technology running, adding fuel to the room, and mill, mill stories of people remotely controlling for instance, nuclear power plants and vehicles is all tease to meet report it themes that whenever someone merely mentions micro chip implants a lot of people freak out, everyone search rushing to doomsday prophecies and conspiracy theories suggesting that people will be forcibly implanted with micro chips by an overbearing government. well, some russian media and now suspect that brain ship research might have existed or could even still exist in the russian government. and this all started when the

education ministry unexpectedly released a statement saying that a brain ship research project was abandoned last year after being deemed impractical and everybody out. because everyone was shocked and surprised to learn that such a thing existed in the 1st place. while r t reached out for comment to the ministry, and here's what they said. the ministry of education and science has no programs dedicated to brain chipping. there is no financing plant. the research group working under the ministry is currently studying matters related to life. one g, t and the process of aging. additionally, they weren't even able to find any specialist who could have potentially said something like this to the media, let alone a person even knowing anything about such a project. although the ministry did say that a proposal for this kind of research was introduced to the government, but it received no support and no funds and nobody's working on it. but that

comment also raised quite a few eyebrows because for proposal to be introduced to the government, it has to overcome quite a few hurdles. and that requires quite a bit of support. but nobody at this point knows who was behind the initial proposal. so no project, no funds, not a single person who has heard or knows anything about this research. so how did this issue come up in the 1st place? well, a popular theory is that this is merely a common taken out of context by the publication. initially started this rumor, a rumor that at this point has taken on a life of its own, on the internet with people freaking out, creating means horror stories. and all this only further exacerbated by news like you on most developing is neural link technology, which is brain machine interface brain implants, and people constantly worrying about vaccines being used to secretly inject the

population with micro chips all in all. it seems that as long as there's this much panic surrounding anything to do with brain ship research, this is an area in which science won't be making any progress anytime soon. or if it does, it will probably have to be confined to some deep, dark, underground research facility. until the time when a bit more people are more open to it. while we're on the subject of high tech advances that inferior claimed to be good for us, they also have many people worried. you privacy watchdogs of teamed up to call for a ban on all use of facial recognition or other automated methods of distinguishing human features in public take into account the extremely high risk supposed by remote biometric identification of individuals and public lakes festival spaces. the european data protection board and the european data protection supervisor goal for general band and any use of a i automated recognition of human features and public leg sensible spaces,

such as recognition of faces, gate fingerprints, dna voice keystrokes, and other biometric or behavioral signals in any context, now they claim these technologies violate fundamental rights and freedoms. the statement joins driving e u grass roots speeds to block the measures to including a, reclaim your face. petition that already got more than 55000 signatories and britain's information commission. as recently voice her own warning. i am deeply concerned about the potential for life facial recognition technology to be used inappropriately, excessively or even recklessly when sensitive personal data is collected on moscow without people's knowledge choice or control. the books could be significant and reform, or discuss the pros and cons of facial recognition technologies where the internet lower x birth and also a form of cd and military intelligence officer caption all because there's been a shoplifter has run out of

a shop. you could argue is disproportionate. if you're capturing old for a period of time because of the terrorist that's running on that, saying he's got a bomb and is going to blow it off and kill hundreds of people. then for that period of time it's, it could be proportionate for you to capture that information, run up through the databases that you've got. i'm trying to identify the individual because you're, you're saving lives. so it's a very careful balance that has to be looked at. and you have to how about flexibility in the way law enforcement uses it? the real concern of cause is whether right me or only above the, the used by private companies of the, of the way to probably to companies will be using technology rather than governments. and then the possible abuse of those of the data gathered, sometimes in real time to, to do to trace people to track them down to their ops. embarrassed them at one point in the lives so. so the proposals are fairly,

being introduced to protect us from government surveillance, but perhaps from, from, from having being intruded by commercial organizations. but the definition of publicly accessible locations doesn't cover most private companies in the u. k. inside some of the big shopping center areas, it doesn't come to the publicly accessible space or inside shops. and that's where some of this enabled facial recognition technology is potentially being used. if you have artificial intelligence, assessing you all the time, you know you'll get with you because the machine says you're guilty. i think the expression you look guilty is now starting to, to, to become real a because because it is going to go by what people look like, you know, what their facial expressions are like rather than even even the behavior or the

directions. i disagree with that completely because the machine never makes a decision that always points a human being. whether that be a security professional or please professional. there are areas where it is adding real value. for example, looking at behavioral analysis, where the computers just monitoring the movement of people are. and it's been able to identify and a lot of railway stations, individuals who from examining home people commit suicide and from to trends. and to learn alarmed people to say you need to have a look at this individual because they're exhibiting those traits, i'm out saving lives. so it's, it's looking about necessity and proportionality the whole way through in every single use case. and the rules, unfortunately haven't caught up with what the technology can do. and therefore it's making sure that those that make the decisions are applying. the ensuring that they're looking after people's freedoms as they're making the decisions as to whether something should be used. public numbers next more than 7000 us

service members have died in combat and america's post 911 was but 4 times more active duty personnel in veterans have died from suicide. according to a new study, this trend is deeply alarming. increasing rates of suicide, veterans and active duty personal are outpacing those of the general population marking a significance shift. while the research find some factors contributing to the rise in suicide and through to all was including exposure to trauma, physical, mental problem, stress and also burnout. but other issues include access to guns, post conflict, and also a difficulty reintegrated upon returning home. however, some of the aspects appear to be specific to the was that america launched on terror groups after the september 11th attacks in the united states. for instance, the widespread use of improvised explosive devices against us troops has caused an increase in traumatic brain injuries. and about a 3rd of wounded soldiers go for at least one more deployment after recovering and

that contributes to suicide related issues. social indifference to post $911.00 was, is also a major factor. many saying that the pentagon had no clear strategic objective in countries like afghanistan. well, the veterans been sharing his thoughts on the findings. american war on terror is a far it's a scam is sadly butler, the marine corps, mitchell major general would have said it's a racket. and it shows now in the way that the american government failed. american veterans and active duty proved in the area of mental health. i've known that this has been an ongoing tragedy since i was in a lock myself in 2004 and experience it firsthand. the main reason we are seeing a continuing veteran suicide epidemic in the united states. there's denial, we can talk about the suicide itself and the trauma of water. but the fact is that

america is joe. you dont squeamish about the issue and we need a fake up to them. and when we do, we're going to see that the here are the bad treatment where they are available all along and was just because we let government perpetuate this criminal on road to keep alternative therapy that we have open battle buddy working to make available for americans that are in there, you tap them away from us. they told us that we are fighting for freedom and then we don't have it when we get home. ok cross to ok. so the way next from our say after which i'll be back here with the latest update from moscow. meantime, thanks for watching. follow us online. friends did updates and some stories that you won't see anywhere else. i'm calling bright, and this is all t international. ah,

look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, accept where's the short or conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence at the point obviously is too great truck rather than fear. i would like to take on various jobs with artificial intelligence real summoning the demon. a robot must protect its own existence, was only doing the breathing technique. i'm gonna take it in the hill. i

knew it goes back to to bring that i need to bring the range. they were just diamond tomorrow. jack in green, a vision. she gave me this that you had to push it, finished that or you can just, you know, hope other than the human russell. but i go over the over the, the book called up just to sort of being able to learn a lot of stories going on in the course of action for ortho. gotcha. i

me. ah, we think he might be a soldier. ditches off the boot. she's wearing you twitched up, took a puzzled stuff. when you was little young on this, you're still watching, please. ah, ah ah ah ah ah ah. hello and welcome to cross top where all things are considered. i'm peter labelle.

we're witnessing a very disturbing media trend, serving an ideology and scoring political points trumps informing citizens. we have the russia gate hoax, the impeachment hoax, and the suppression of any debate on the origin of colbert, now front and center is the capitol hill riot. what does the f b? i know the cross talking the medium joined by my guess, dave lind, aarp in philadelphia. he's an investigative journalist, founder of the new site. this can't be happening dot net in detroit. we have steve gerber. he is a syndicated national radio talk show host and social media influence are and in plymouth we cross the patrick kennings and he's the editor and founder of the 21st century wire dot com. all right, gentlemen, cross talk rules and effects. that means you can jump in anytime you want. let me go to patrick, 1st thing in plymouth here. i mentioned in my introduction here, you know, the, the rush gate hoax, you know, the, the 2 fake impeachment prod.