please, i me, the headlining this out, run off. russia says it was forced to fire warning shops after a british war ship breached its black fi border. however, london, in 5th, the vessel was traveling in international waters. also ahead, governments can't decide unilaterally which websites they don't like. journalists react in the united states. these is dozens of media web domains linked to iran, claiming that behind this information can be criminal or victim. a french woman who says she lived in terra for decades is on trial for murdering her husband. was campaign was that little protection in cases of domestic violence.

the report reveals suicides by us, the veterans of the war on terror, 4 times higher than combat sex. we hear from one former i just and 6 in the evening on wednesday, here in moscow. my name's collin bryant, welcome to you. we'll use formality international. our top story this out in the russian defense ministry says it's 5 warning shots after a british destroyer and its waters. let's get the latest now from our correspondent marine gas dev. hi again, moorehead. what more? we now with this point? well, according to the russian ministry of defense, the british warship was warned, as it was approaching russia territorial waters, off the coast of crimea to stay out good. those warnings,

it proceeded into russia. there were waters. there were warning shot fod after ignored verbal warnings by re view even full bonds drop by an aircraft along the route. the british destroy eventually left russia territorial waters. but russia is now saying that this was a pre medium mediated incident. this is provocative behavior by the british. they have summoned the british military attache as well as the ambassador to explain for the actions of the british worship. the dangerous actions of the royal navy destroy, have been assessed by the russian defense ministry of the gross violation of the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea. the russian military called on the british side to conduct a thorough investigation into the actions of the h. m. s. defend the crew to prevent similar incidents in the future. statements by

the british defer vastly from the version that we were given by the russians. they say that they were merely peacefully sailing through an internationally recognized route and the, there was, there were no warnings and no warning short side. now, there is an explanation. one of the explanations is that either the british press offers that handles these or the statements has no idea of what happened or the british op will fully live because a bbc journalist abroad. as allegedly said that he has confirmed that the world would insure a shot thought that they purposefully went through these casual waters which again, britain recognizes ukrainian territorial waters rather than russian. nevertheless, the british say that was washer said, is this information it's incorrect to say either that it was fired upon or that the ship was in russian waters. h m. s. defender was taking the most direct and

internationally recognized roots between ukraine and georgia. as you know, the u. k. does not recognize russia claim to crimea and we continue to uphold the international consensus. the most of annexation of crimea is illegal. you could hear russian jets buzzing the aircraft. sorry. the bullshit as it was tragic to russia, statue was allegedly afterwards during this interview with a b, b. c journalist who's abroad a j h m. s defender. he says that they have now left and proceeding to georgia, but russia has for many years now, warned about the increasing increasing nato activity in the black sea saying that the native worship. so they're almost on a permanent basis. these are sophisticated worships with precise weaponry. ok the plot thickens, doesn't it? or are we going to get reaction in the coming out was for now the more i guess the a thank you next the top level,

international security conferences underway and moscow tackling everything from cybersecurity to regional conflicts and data. the annual event brings together defense ministers and experts from around the globe and more than $600.00 are expected to discuss the most pressing security and stability concerns right now. the russian president lead off by saying that there are still many global challenges, and one of them is that some countries are trying to change the world order that has been established since the end of this 2nd world war latimer food and also with stress that russia is going to keep strengthening in its military potential and improve military capabilities, but he's going to do this carefully, not to disrupt the global strategic stability. so let's have a listening to what we will do, everything to guarantee the peace and security of the russian people to improve our armed forces. and of course, by means of diplomacy to lead

a meaningful dialogue with all interested partners. clearly, we are concerned by the continued build up of nato military potential and infrastructure near russia's borders. as well as the fact that the airlines declines to constructively consider our proposals to de escalate tensions and reduce the risk of unpredictable incidence. and we hope that common sense and the desire to develop constructive relations with us will eventually prevail, that russian defense minister, shortly who's also one of the participants of this conference, said that there is a great chance that of gannett stan will descend into civil war. once again, after us troops pulled out and he lamented the fact that washington has shown no desire to work with russia to prevent this from happening. but he attributed much of that to the risk of phobia that unfortunately has prevailed among vast and military and political leads in the west. i guess it speaks volumes that none of

the native representatives have decided to come to moscow for these conference. despite being invited the united states to seize more than 30 media web site domain names linked to iran for what it calls that information campaigns. it comes, of course, of the rising tensions between the 2 nations. we heard back earlier from the international federation of journalists, which criticizes the move, highlighting that other message should have been used. the blocking by the us. so websites run by groups affiliated with a run is the wrong way to deal with so cold disinformation. while real journalism requires the respect of solid ethical principles and full independence from governments, we cannot accept the government's unilateral, decide which websites they don't like to shut down. thus challenging freedom of speech. the ban on our website reveals once again the falsehoods of the slogan, so freedom of expression and all the other headlines promoted by the united states

of america, including its inability to confront the truth. one of the websites that was seized is run by the who's easy that is fighting against saudi arabia, and has long been accused by the united states being iranian proxies. the other website that was the easiest of iranian origin and the other website press tv is that, is it, iran's official english language, news outlet, the primary voice of iran to the english speaking world, important to take the context into account. now we have joe biden and his ministration that have been in office since earlier this year. that have talked about reopening the iran nuclear deal at criticize the trump administration's handling of us relations with iran. but we've just had an election in iran itself in which we have a new president who is quite critical of his predecessor rodney and his negotiations with the united states. so we have a new administration sent to come into office in iran, we have a new administration united states and the contacts and the moment of this is quite

interesting. or a little earlier, i talked to journalist robert in the cash to contribute to one of the networks targeted press tv. he says that if us media sites will cease, the global reaction will be rather different even with american websites in american use outlet. so, i mean, iran is often criticized and bastard as a country which doesn't allow freedom of speech. yet. when abraham gracie was elected, some of the 1st news outlets which were allowed to come and ask questions and were able to have their media. there were american news outlets. could you imagine that in the united states press tv was one of the 1st outlets which is allowed to ask a question to president joe biden when he was elected. it is very unlikely. i don't think that we will see this in the foreseeable future. i mean, even the left side now has been taken down in the united states. so if an american use outlet is targeted, we see everyone jump on. but when it comes to a foreign news outlets, or what would be an enemy state of the united states,

suddenly there is a silence. and a sort of complicity here when it comes to looking at the issue and almost sort of a justification of this being of press tv and other websites being taken down. people should have the freedom to say what they want. and especially in the united states, which constantly talks about freedom of speech and values. the freedom of speech frenchwoman is gone on trial this week for murdering her husband. valerie backhoe faces a possible life sentence, but says she did it to protect herself and her 4 children. well, the 600000 people have already signed a petition in her support shall do ben's game. paris picks up the story. it's a trial that his grip fraud with hundreds of 1000 signing a petition for her release. valerie, but cool, admit she shot dead, her husband and buried his body in the woods. in her defense, she claims that he was abusive and she feared for the safety of their children. in

a book she wrote about her relationship with daniel to let. she described the mistreatment. i did what he said. i didn't have much choice. what he thought i was doing something i shouldn't do. he was violent at 1st was slabs. then he started kicking me and strangling me over time there came with threats with a firearm. but valerie bye cause he had been gone much earlier. paulette was originally in a relationship with her mother. he then started sexually abusing valerie becca when she was just 12 crying. he was late to sent to jail for on his release to return to the family home. and the abuse resumed at 17. she was pregnant with paulette child . she alleges that he later forster into prostitution watching a she had sex with client. when the client asked the price,

daniel told me to repeat, it said that he could hear better. and he told me to answer yes or no. on the same valerie but co shot her husband, she told the court the paulette had asked about the 14 year old daughter and how she was sexually when prob, she said that she had been afraid that he would also sell the body for sex. and valerie buck, who is trial which is currently underway, her lawyer will argue that she was a desperate woman, pushed to kill, to survive. these women who are victims of violence have no protection. the judiciary is still too slow, not very active enough into lenient towards the perpetrators who could continue to exercise their violent power. the prosecution while a legit valerie buck who killed her husband in a pre meditated act which carries a maximum life sentence in france. this trial shines a light on domestic violence in a country with one of europe's highest weights of women who being killed by

a current or a former partner, 55 losing their lives already this year. that led to an our poor ring of and go with the campaign is demanding action. when did you do? the point is not to blame the police, prosecutors or child welfare services. this is a failure of the whole system. and acknowledging this help to improve support from defending prevent domestic violence and the sides, which are the most extreme before. and let me see the story. the last day the french government did respond with new legislation, including the emergency measures to keep the violent abuses from approaching the victim. critic say though that the measures have been implemented too slowly. when the generals, in from the problem of violence by men against women, is becoming a stomach. every year,

225000 women become victims of domestic violence. every 2 to 3 days, a woman dies in france and the numbers are coming down. the last year hasn't seen any decrease, no, actually have been taken to contain in fact, the measures announced by the government after a series of consultations on domestic violence the last several months. yeah. well either meshes ready and now it's already been put in place. but funding hasn't been increased. we know that the police and legal authorities are completely saturated and can't implement you meshes without additional financing and associations to support victims. violence also lack the means to do the walk and everything in the system in fact cannot walk because the support is not that the measures that have been announced in sufficient and do not measure up to the problem of moscow said he come across, lapses flagged by the world health organization at

a coven vaccine plant that is making the necessary corrections. the w. h. i was looking into 7 russian factories after the country applied to register sputnik, the in europe, as alia. katrinka told me earlier. out of the 7 existing sputnik re factories a total of 4, which is more than a half have been inspected by the officials of the w h o. and there were only complaint found at one single production site in the fall, which included issues with data and test results and things like issues with lap conditions. now, according to the russian government, all these concerns and issues have been fully dealt with me and indeed that have been complaints from the inspection team. as far as we know, everything has already been taken into account and what needed to be changed. all right, according to the russian government, the reason why everything was fixed so quickly is that the authorities from

russia's ministry of industry and trade had been aware of the preliminary reports by the w h o. and so to say began doing their homework in advance and already at this point, the inspectors from the world health organization have been invited back to far to check how their concerns have been dealt with. officials in moscow are also stressing that the complaints about this one single production site in no way undermine the positive conclusions about the effectiveness and quality of the sputnik the japs. the international recognition of the russian made vaccine has been somewhat of a tricky issue in this country has been claimed many times that be has fallen victim to politics. because while in more than 60 countries around the world, what degree has been given the green light, it has not been approved for use by the european medical agency for example, and the world health organization as well. but with everything now,

being fixed in the russian officials are hoping that this could be the next major step to full international recognition of sputnik be controversial with brain chip. technology might sound like science fiction, but it's going to increasing attention over the years with countries developing programs to explore, implanting microchips into people's brains. and recent reports in the russian meter about the technology are only adding fuel to the room. the mill, with stories of humans remotely controlling, for instance, nuclear power plants and vehicles. his art sees dmitri polk, it themes that whenever someone merely mentions micro chip implants, a lot of people freak out. everyone search rushing to doomsday prophecies and conspiracy theories suggesting that people will be forcibly implanted with micro chips by an overbearing government. well, some russian media and now suspect that brain sharp research might have existed or

could even still exist in the russian government. and this all started when the education ministry unexpectedly released a statement saying that a brain sharp research project was abandoned last year after being deemed impractical. and everybody now because everyone was shocked and surprised to learn that such a thing existed in the 1st place. while r t reached out for comment to the ministry, and here's what they said. the ministry of education and science has no programs dedicated to brain shipping. there is no financing planned. the research group working under the ministry is currently studying matters related to life. one g, b, t and the process of aging. additionally, they weren't even able to find any specialist who could have potentially said something like this to the media, let alone a person even knowing anything about such a project. although the ministry did say that a proposal for this kind of research was introduced to the government, but it received no support and no funds and nobody's working on it. but that

comment also raised quite a few eyebrows because for proposal to be introduced to the government, it has to overcome quite a few hurdles. and that requires quite a bit of support. but nobody at this point knows who was behind the initial proposal. so no project, no funds, not a single person who has heard or knows anything about this research. so how did this issue come up in the 1st place? well, a popular theory is that this is merely or comments taken out of context by the publication that initially started this rumor, a rumor that at this point has taken on a life of its own on the internet with people freaking out, creating means horror stories. and all this only further exacerbated by news like you on mosque developing is neural link technology, which is brain machine interface brain implants, and people constantly worrying about vaccines being used to secretly inject the

population with micro chips all in all. it seems that as long as there's this much panic surrounding anything to do with brain chip research, this is an area in which science won't be making any progress anytime soon. or if it does, it'll probably have to be confined to some deep dark underground research facility . until the time when a bit more people are more open to it. while we're on the subject of the high tech advances, but in theory, a claim to be good for us. they also have many people worried. you privacy watchdogs, have teamed up to cool for a ban on old use of facial recognition, or other automated methods of distinguishing human features in public take into account the extremely high risk supposed by remote biometric identification of individuals and public leg sensible spaces. the european data protection board and the european data protection supervisor cold for general band and any use of

a i for automated recognition of human features and public like sensible spaces such as recognition of faces, gate fingerprints, dna voice keystrokes, and other biometric or behavioral signals in any context or they claim these technologies violate fundamental rights and freedoms. the statement joins growing. you grass roots beds to block the measures, including a, reclaim your face petition that already got more than $55000.00 signatures. and britain's information commission has recently voice her own warning. i am deeply concerned about the potential for life facial recognition technology to be used inappropriately, excessively, or even the recklessly when sensitive personnel data is collected on a musky without people's knowledge choice or control. the impacts could be significant. andrew pharma discuss the pros and cons of facial recognition technologies with an internet no expert, and also a former senior military intelligence officer. caption all because there's been

a shoplifter has run out of a shop. that you could argue is disproportionate. if you're capturing all for a period of time because of the terrorist that's running on that, saying he's got a bomb and is going to blow it up and kill hundreds of people. then for that period of time it's, it could be proportionate for you to capture that information, run it through databases that you've got. i'm trying to identify the individual because you're, you're saving lives. so it's a very careful balance that has to be looked out. and you have to have a flexibility in the way law enforcement uses it. the real concern of cause is whether right me or only above the, the used by private companies of the, of the way to private companies will be using technology rather than governments. and then the possible abuse of those of the data gathered, sometimes in real time to, to do to trace people to track them down to their ops. embarrassed them at one

point in the lives so. so the proposals only fairly being introduced to protect us from government surveillance, but perhaps from, from, from having being intruded a by commercial organizations. but the definition of publicly accessible locations doesn't cover most private companies in the u. k. inside some of the big shopping center areas, it doesn't come to the publicly accessible space or inside shops amounts, where some of this enabled facial recognition technology is potentially being used . have artificial intelligence, assessing you all the time. you know, you will get with you because the machine says you will get a fake. the expression you look guilty is now starting to, to, to become real a because because it is going to go by what people look like, you know, what their facial expressions are like rather than even even the behavior or the

directions. i disagree with that completely because the machine never makes a decision that always points a human being to whether that be a security professional or please professional. there are areas where it is adding real value. for example, looking at behavioral analysis, where the computers just monitoring the movement of people around it's been able to identify and a lot of railway stations, individuals who from examining how people commit suicide and from trends. it's a, it's a alarm to people to say, you need to have a look at this individual because they're exhibiting those traits. i'm up saving lives. so it's, it's looking about necessity in the proportionality the whole way through in every single use case. and the rules, unfortunately haven't caught up with what the technology can do. and therefore it's making sure that those that make the decisions are applying. the ensuring that they're looking after people's freedoms as they're making the decisions as to whether something should be used. traveling numbers next more than 7000 us service

members have died in combat in americas post 911 was but 4 times more active duty personnel and veterans have died from suicide. according to a new study, this trend is deeply alarming increasing rates of suicide, veterans and active duty personal or out pacing those of the general population marking a significance shift of the research find some factors contributing to the rise in suicide is true of all was including exposure to trauma, physical, mental problems, also stress and burn out. other issues include access to guns, pose conflicts, and also with difficulty and integrating on returning home. however, some aspects appeared to be specific to the was that america launched on terror groups after the september 11th attacks in the united states. for instance, as the widespread use of improvised explosive devices against us troops, it's cause an increase in traumatic brain injuries. about

a 3rd of wounded soldiers go for at least one more deployment after recovering, and that's contributed also to suicide related issues. social indifference to post 911 was also a major factor with many saying that the pentagon had no clear strategic objectives in countries like afghanistan. one veterans been sharing his thoughts on the findings. the american war on terror is a far, it's a scam. as suddenly butler, the marine corps, mitchell major general would have said it's a racket. and it shows now in the way that the american government failed. american veterans and active duty proved in the area of mental health. i've known that this has been an ongoing tragedy since i was in a lock myself in 2004 and experience it firsthand. the main reason we are seeing up in 10 ewing veteran suicide epidemic in the united states. there's denial,

we can talk about the suicide itself and the trauma of water. but the fact is that america is joe. you dont squeamish about the issue and we need a fake up to them. and when we do, we're going to see that the here are the back treatments where they are available all along and was just because we let government perpetuate this criminal on road. the keeps alternative therapies that we hope battle buddy working to make available for americans better and they kept them away from us. they told us that we are fighting for freedom and then we don't have it when we get home. today, we have an unflinching look at life behind bars next on our to after which i'll have the next a news update always good to happy with us. see you soon the ah,

with me ah ah ah. doing the breathing technique and then take a pool in the hill. and then i don't know where it goes back to to break down and in the

range they were just diamond fields rec tomorrow. the judge in green, a vision she knew me were witnessing a very disturbing media trend, serving an ideology and scoring political points. trump's informing citizens, we had the russia gate hoax, the impeachment hoax, and the suppression of any debate on the origin of coven now front and center is the capitol hill, ryan. what does the f b? i know the i

welcome to the united states of america. we call this land of the free, but this country is home, a largest prison population in the world. we have more people in prison, one and we have colleges and universities. one 3rd of all incarcerated females globally are locked up here in the united states. put that in perspective, imagine all of los angeles and all of new york combined arrested every year. the you need to tell you read the whole you can open read between the person who as an american citizen, you don't.