tomorrow the judge agreed. this should be in the headlines in arthur. russia says it was supposed to defy a warning shot. saw through a warship reached its black sea border. however, london insists the vessel was traveling in international waters to come, govern, can decide unilaterally which websites they don't like june this react us the dozens of media web de maintenance linked around, claiming they are behind a quote, this information campaign, and criminal victims, frenchwoman who say she lived in terra for decades is on trial for murdering her husband. had his campaign is warned, there was little protection in cases of domestic violence and a report,

suicide by us from the war on terror are actually 4 times higher than death in combat. we hear from a former cell. ah, good evening, just gone 8 o'clock in moscow. you watching artie international. the russian defense ministry says it's 5 warning shorts for a british destroyer, entered its waters with more on the story. he's our senior correspondent, murdered guest if the british warship was detected as it was approaching russia's territorial waters, just off the coast of crimea, it was warned repeatedly to change its course. the british, they're apparently refused to heed those schools and eventually ended russia. territory was a patrol boat russian patrol boat apparently fought warning shots according to the

russian ministry of defense. eventually a russian jet was forced to drop bombs ahead of the, along the route of the british warship. and eventually it left russia territory waters. but the russians saying that this was provocative bay area. they have some of the british military attache as well as the ambassador to explain this incident . and the behavior of the british worship. the dangerous actions of the royal navy destroy, have been assessed by the russian defense ministry of the gross violation of the 1982 united nations convention on the law of the sea. the russian military called on the british side to conduct a thorough investigation into the actions of the h. m. s. defend the crew. to prevent similar incidents in the future. london version of events is markedly different from well the russian version of vents, as well as a journalist who was on board to the british say that they were peace for the

sailing along. and that the russians were somewhere out there, carrying out military exercises, of the new warnings were issued of any kind. and that saying that all these reports about warning shots being fired, a russian, this information, it's incorrect to say either that it was fired upon or that the ship was in russian waters. h. m. s. defender was taking the most direct and internationally recognized routes between ukraine and georgia. as you know, the u. k. does not recognize russia's claim to crimea, and we continue to hold the international consensus that rushes annexation of crime . it is illegal. there are a number of possible explanations for the british events. one of them is that those writing press statements and releases have a new idea of what happened. another is that, unfortunately, the british may not be being entirely truthful. whoa, yes, they recognize russia's territory, waters as ukrainian territory waters. a journalist gbc journalists abroad. h m.

s. the fed says that yes, the worship was issued warnings by the russians. verbal warnings that yes, a purposefully entered the territorial waters that, that controlled by russia and the yes, there were warning shots being fired to in fact, during, during his interview you could hear russian jets buzzing the british. the british destroy. this was a deliberately for the navy, was every morning, a strong question because i so i'm not sure i called reaction the opposing statements are still pouring in, but russia has for a long time. now run alarm bells about high nato activity in the black sea. they have said that almost a permanent basis now there are sophisticated native worship station in the black sea with precise and long range weapons abroad. and these sort of build up leads to

incidence like we saw today. meanwhile, the top level international security conference is taking place in moscow, tackling everything from cybersecurity to regional conflicts, and they take the annual event bring together defense ministers and experts moran. the globe, more than $600.00, are expected to discuss the most pressing security and stability concerns. the russian president lead off by saying that there are still many global challenges, and one of them is that some countries are trying to change the world order that has been established since the end of the 2nd world war latimer food and also with stress that russia is going to keep strengthening its military potential and improve military capabilities, but he's going to do this carefully, not to disrupt the global strategic stability. so lapse have a listening to what we will do, everything to guarantee the peace and security of the russian people to improve our armed forces. and of course, by means of diplomacy to lead

a meaningful dialogue with all interested partners. clearly, we are concerned by the continued build up of nato military potential and infrastructure near russia's borders. as well as the fact that the airlines declines to constructively consider our proposals to de escalate tensions and reduce the risk of unpredictable incidence. and we hope that common sense and the desire to develop construct relations with us will eventually prevail, that russian defense minister, i assure you who is also one of the key participants of this conference, said that there is a great chance that of gannett stan will descend into civil war, once again after us troops pull out and he lamented the fact that washington has show no desire to work with russia to prevent this from happening. but he attributed much of that to the risk of phobia that unfortunately has prevailed among vast and military and political leads in the west. i guess it speaks volumes

that none of the native representatives have decided to come to moscow for these conference despite being invited. not the u. s. s. these more than 30 media site to main sling to a ran over what he calls this information campaigns. the justice department added that the sites were hosted on american domains in violation of washington sanctions . the move comes in mid rising tensions which are on we got response from the international federation of journalist, which does say a different response would have been more appropriate. the blocking by the us, so websites run by groups affiliated with a run is the wrong way to deal with. so cold disinformation. while real journalism requires the respect of solid ethical principles and full independence from governments, we cannot accept the government's unilateral, decide which websites they don't like to shut down. thus challenging freedom of speech. the ban on our website reveals once again the falsehoods of the slogan,

so freedom of expression and all the other headlines promoted by the united states of america, including its inability to confront the truth. one of the websites that was seized is run by the who's easy that is fighting against saudi arabia, and has long been accused by the united states being iranian proxies. the other website that was seized is of iranian origin and the other website press tv is that, is it, iran's official english language, news outlet, the primary voice of iran to the english speaking world, important to take the context into account. now we have joe biden and his administration that have been in office since earlier this year that had talked about reopening the iran nuclear deal, criticize the trump administration's handling of us relations with iran. but we've just had an election in iran itself in which we have a new president who is quite critical of his predecessor rodney and his negotiations with the united states. so we have

a new administration set to come into office in iran. we have a new administration united states and the contacts and the moment of this is quite interesting kind of open there. well, we also spoke to journalists, robert in the cash contribute to press t v, which was one of the networks targeted. he says of us media sites were, sees the global reaction would be rather different even with american websites in american news outlet. so i mean, iran is often criticized and bastard as a country which doesn't allow freedom of speech yet. when abraham gracie was elected, some of the 1st news outlets which were allowed to come and ask questions and were able to have their media. there were american news outlets. could you imagine that in the united states press tv was one of the 1st outlets, which is allowed to ask a question to president joe biden when he was elected. i'm, it is very unlikely. i don't think that we will see this in the foreseeable future . i mean,

even the left side now has been taken down in the united states. so if an american news outlet is targeted, we see everyone jump on. but when it comes to a foreign news outlets, or what would be an enemy state of the united states, suddenly there is a silence. and a sort of complicity here when it comes to looking at the issue and almost sort of a justification of this being of press tv and other websites being taken down. people should have the freedom to say what they want. and especially in the united states, which constantly talks about freedom of speech and values, the freedom of speech. the french woman has gone on trial this week for murdering her husband pottery because you faces a possible life sentence, but to say she did it to protect herself and her 4 children more than 660-0000, have already signed a petition in her support with no, nie from paris says charlotte davinsky. it's a trial that his grip fraud with hundreds of 1000 signing

a petition for her release. valerie buck, who admit she shot dead, her husband, and buried his body in the woods. in her defense, she claims that he was abusive and she feared for the safety of their children. in a book she wrote about her relationship with daniel to let. she described the mistreatment. i did what he said. i didn't have much choice. what he thought i was doing something i shouldn't do. he was violent at 1st was slabs. then he started kicking me and strangling me over time there came with threats with a firearm. but valerie bye cause he had been gone much earlier. paulette was originally in a relationship with her mother. he then started sexually abusing valerie becca when she was just 12, a crying he was late to sent to jail for on his release to return to the family home. and he abused resumes at 17. she was pregnant with paulette child. she

alleges that he later foster into prostitution watching a she had sex with clients. when the client asked the price, daniel told me to repeat, it said that he could hear better. and he told me to answer yes or no. on the same valerie but co shot her husband, she told the court the paulette had asked about by 14 year old daughter and how she was sexually when prob, she said that she had been afraid that he would also sell her body for sex. and valerie buck, who is trial, which is currently under way, lloyd, will argue that she was in desperate woman pushed to kill the survivor. these women who had victims or violence have no protection to deduce rays, still to slow, not free active enough into lenient towards the perpetrators who could continue to exercise their violent power. the prosecution, meanwhile, a legit valerie buck who killed her husband in a pre meditated act which carries

a maximum life sentence in front. this trial shines a light on domestic violence in a country with one of europe's highest weights of women who have been killed by a current or a former partner. 55, losing their lives already this year. that led to an our poor ring of and go with campaign is demanding action. see, so when did you was going to not to blame the police, prosecutors or child welfare services? this is a failure of the whole system and acknowledging this helps to improve support from victims and to prevent domestic violence and fem asides, which are the most extreme form of violence. so last day, the french government did were stormed with new legislation, including for the emergency measures to keep the violent abuses from approaching

the victim. critic say though that the measures have been implemented too slowly. in france, the problem of violence by men against women is becoming stomach. every year, 225000 women become victims of domestic violence. every 2 to 3 days, a woman dies in france and the numbers are coming down. the last year hasn't seen any decrease and no actually have been taken to contain this assault. in fact, the measures announced by the government after a series of consultations on domestic violence over the last several months. while i do measures ready and now it's already been put in place, but funding hasn't been increased. we know that the police and negro authorities are completely saturated and can't implement you measures without additional financing and personnel associations that support victims violence also lack the means to do the walk. everything in the system in fact cannot walk because the

support is not that the measures that have been announced or insufficient and do not measure up to the problem at all. well sco says it has come across lapses flagged by the world health organization, the covey vaccine plant, and is making the necessary corrections. the w. h. o is looking into 7 russian factories after the country applied to register. sputnik free in europe. per franco gave more details to call him bryce out of the 7 existing sputnik re factories, a total of 4, which is more than a half have been inspected by the officials of the w h o. and there were only complaints found at one single production site in the fall, which included issues with data and test results and things like issues with lab conditions. now, according to the russian government, all these concerns and issues have been fully dealt with me as to indeed that had

been complaints from the inspection team. as far as we know, everything has already been taken into account and what needed to be changed has already been changed. according to the russian government. the reason why everything was fixed so quickly is that the authorities from russia's ministry of industry and trade had been aware of the preliminary reports by the w a show. and so to say, began doing their homework in advance. and already, at this point, the inspectors from the world health organization have been invited back to to check how their concerns have been dealt with. officials in moscow are also stressing that the complaints about this one single production site in no way undermine the positive conclusions about the effect of this and quality of the sputnik v. jap, the international recognition of the washing made vaccine has been somewhat of a tricky issue. in this country has been claimed many times that would be as fallen

victim to politics because while in more than 60 countries around the world, we has been given the green light. it has not been approved for use by the european medical agency, for example. and the world health organization as well, but with everything now being fixed in the russian officials are hoping that this could be the next major step to full international recognition of sputnik be controversial. br in chip technology may sound like science fiction, but it is, it has gained increasing attention over the years with countries developing programs to explore implanting micro chips into human brains and recent reports in the russian media to about the technology of only added fuel to the room a male with stories of humans remotely controlling for instance, nuclear power plants and or say vehicles to meet park has the story. it themes that whenever someone merely mentions micro chip implants,

a lot of people freak out. everyone search rushing to doomsday prophecies and conspiracy theories suggesting that people will be forcibly implanted with micro chips by an overbearing government. while some russian media and now suspect that brain ship research might have existed or could even still exist in the russian government. and this all started when the education ministry unexpectedly released a statement saying that a brain ship research project was abandoned last year after being deemed impractical. and everybody now because everyone was shocked and surprised to learn that such a thing existed in the 1st place. while r t reached out for comment to the ministry, and here's what they said. the ministry of education and science has no programs dedicated to brain chipping. there is no financing planned. the research group working under the ministry is currently studying matters related to life. one g, p, t and the process of aging. additionally,

they weren't even able to find any specialist who could have potentially said something like this to the media, let alone a person even knowing anything about such a project. although the ministry did say that a proposal for this kind of research was introduced to the government, but it received no support and no funds and nobody's working on it. but that comment also raised quite a few eyebrows because for proposal to be introduced to the government, it has to overcome quite a few hurdles. and that requires quite a bit of support. but nobody at this point knows who was behind the initial proposal. so no project, no funds, not a single person who has heard or knows anything about this research. so how did this issue come up in the 1st place? well, a popular theory is that this is merely or common taken out of context by the publication . initially started this rumor, a rumor that at this point has taken on

a life of its own on the internet with people freaking out, creating means horror stories. and all this only further exacerbated by news like you on mosque developing is neuro link technology, which is brain machine interface brain implants. and people constantly worrying about vaccines being used to secretly inject the population with micro chips all in all. it seems that as long as there's this much panic surrounding anything to do with brain chip research, this is an area in which science won't be making any progress anytime soon. or if it does, it'll probably have to be confined to some deep dark underground research facility . until the time when a bit more people are more open to it. while high tech advance is that in theory, are trying to be good for us to have many people worried e. previously watch dogs and i'm calling for a ban on all facial rushing recognition or other automated message use to identify

people in public take into account the extremely high risk supposed by remote biometric identification of individuals and public lakes festival spaces. the european data protection board and the european data protection supervisor, coal for general band and any use of a i for automated recognition of human features and public leg sensible spaces such as recognition of faces, gate fingerprints, dna voice keystrokes, and other biometric or behavioral signals in any context, they claim that these technologies to violate fundamental rights and freedoms statement joins growing groceries campaigns to block measures, including a reclaim, you will face petition that already got more than 55000 signatories and britain's information commissioner has recently voiced her concerns to i am deeply concerned about the potential for life facial recognition technology to be used inappropriately, excessively or even recklessly when sensitive personal data is collected on moscow

without people's knowledge choice or control. the impacts could be significant. when i did discuss the pros and cons of facial recognition technology with an internet or experts and also a former senior military intelligence officer, caption all because there's been a shoplifter, has run out of a shop that you could argue is disproportionate. if you're capturing all for a period of time, because the terrorist that's running on that saying he's got a bomb and is going to blow it up and kill hundreds of people. then for that period of time it's, it could be proportionate for you to capture that information, run it through databases that you've got. i'm trying to identify the individual because you're, you're saving lives. so it's a very careful balance that has to be looked out. and you have to have a flexibility in the way law enforcement uses it. the real concern of cause is whether right me or only above the, the used by private companies of the,

of the way to private companies will be using technology rather than governments. and then the possible abuse of those of the data gathered, sometimes in real time to do to trace people to track them down to their ops, embarrass them at one point in the lives so. so the proposals only fairly being introduced to protect us from government surveillance, but perhaps from, from, from having being intruded a by commercial organizations. but the definition of publicly accessible locations doesn't cover most private companies in the u. k. inside some of the big shopping center areas, it doesn't come to the publicly accessible space or inside shops. and that's where some of this enabled facial recognition technology is potentially being used. he have artificial intelligence assessing you all the time. you know,

you'll get with you because the machine says you will get a fake. the expression you look guilty is now starting to, to, to become real. because because it is going to go by what people look like, you know what their facial expressions are like rather than even even the behavior or the directions. i disagree with that completely because the machine never makes a decision that always points a human being to it. whether that be a security professional or please professional. there are areas where it is adding real value. for example, looking at behavioral analysis, where the computers just monitoring the movement of people around it's been able to identify and a lot of railway stations, individuals who from examining how people commit suicide and from trends. it's a, it's a alarm to people to say, you need to have a look at this individual because they're exhibiting those traits. i'm up saving lives. so it's, it's looking about necessity and not proportionality the whole way through in every single use case. and the rules,

unfortunately haven't caught up with what the technology can do. and therefore it's making sure that those that make the decisions are applying. the ensuring that they're looking after people's freedoms as they're making the decisions as to whether something should be used by more than $7000.00 us service members have died in combat in americas post $911.00 was but 4 times more active duty personnel and veterans of actually died from suicide. according to a new study, this trend is deeply alarming. increasing rates of suicide, veterans and active duty personal or out pacing those of the general population marking a significance shift. well, the research does find some factors contributing to the rise in suicide are true to all voice including exposure to trauma, physical, mental problems, and also stress and burned eyes. other issues do include access to gun guns,

post conflict, and a difficulty reintegrating on returning home. however, some aspects do appear to be specific to the walls that america did launch on terra groups after the september 11th attacks in the united states. for instance, the widespread use of improvised explosive devices against us troops has caused an increase in formatting brain injuries and about a 3rd of wounded soldiers to go for at least one more deployment after recovering, which does contribute to suicide related issues. social indifference to post 911 wars is also a major factor with many saying that the pentagon had no clear strategic objective in countries like afghanistan, one veterans share his thoughts on the findings. the american war on terror is afar . it's a scam as suddenly butler, the marine corps, mitchell major general would have said it's a racket,

and it shows now in the way that the american government failed. american veterans and active duty proved in the area of mental health. i've known that this has been an ongoing tragedy since i was in a lock myself in 2004 and experience it firsthand. the main reason we are seeing up in 10 ewing, bettering suicide epidemic in the united states. there's denial. we can talk about the suicide itself and the trauma of water. but the fact is that america is joe, you dont squeamish about the issue and we need a fake up to them. and when we do, we're going to see that the here are the back treatments where they are available all along and was just because we let government perpetuate this criminal on road. keeps alternative therapies that we hope battle buddy working to make available for americans. battery, they kept them away from us. they told us that we are fighting for freedom and then

we don't have it when we get home. watching international, thanks the company this evening, you're up to date. we're back again. this hopefully the join me every thursday on the alex simon show. when i was speaking to guess in the world, the politic sport business. i'm show business. i'll see you then. me this is your media a reflection of reality in a world transformed what will make you feel safe relation, community you going the right way?

where are you being somewhere? which direction? what is truth is breaking in a world corrupted. you need to defend the join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. use is that you took was a college city from could to can each other than the remain russell. but i hope so. but over the over the, the book really just sort of the motion learning in the month of the senior course, which is actually just for ron.

ah, good position. the good we think he might be a soldier because off the boot, she's wearing a huge switch called up. took a puzzle when you was on the shore. still watching priest please. ah, ah, who anything a very disturbing media trend, serving an ideology and scoring political points trumps. informing citizens. we had the russia gate hoax, the impeachment hoax, and the suppression of any debate on the origin of coven now front and center is the capitol hill. ryan. what goes the f b i know.