group parents, you feel like their voices are being ignored by those and political office. now the debate over critical race, serious happening all over the united states, even though the actual educational program is nothing new and has been around for more than 40 years. however, this past week at a school board meeting right down the street from here in washington, dc in that loudon county, it became quickly obvious that paris had had enough. now the conversation became so heated that at one point police were called in, and parents were even dragged out by police from the public meeting. also at one point the crowd even broke out into singing the star spangled banner. now, one of the speakers at night was say to dick black, who had this to say at the podium, this board has a dark history of suppressing free speech. they caught you red handed, with an enemy is less to punish opponents of critical race theory. you're teaching

children to hate others because of their skin color, and you're forcing them to lie about other kids, gender. i am disgusted by your bigger trait. for the former jacob black joined us now obviously very passionate. you could hear that in your voice right there. for mistakes or i just have to ask you, i want to get some of the background for this me. i think that's being left in the reporting of this meeting because lot of county officials actually come back and say, guess what critical race theory isn't even being taught in our school system. so then why was in the room that night? why were all of these parents there? and why were they upset? first of all, let me say that i have a contract and i'm looking at it right now. it's invoice number 246 tonight, 2020. and it is for our coaching support for the school leaders focused on critical race theory development. so when they tell you that

they're not doing it, it permeates the schools in is it is absolutely integral to everything that they're doing now. and so there are, there are very much on the defensive in there, frankly, just lying to you when they say that critical race theory is not an integral part of the instruction. what, what angers is the parents so much? it's so deeply ingrained in american culture that individual spirit should be treated as, as individual people are not as people who are members of a racial room. and so this non discrimination principle is a part of who we are as a culture. and certainly the democrats, the liberals, are flipping out on a chair and they're saying work. we really need to begin to 8 and denigrate

people, the white race. because they're the oppressors you are the oppressed and, and it's, you even see it in the department of defense, department of justice, many of the federal agencies. and i think people have become aware of it. particularly as we're coming out of the kobe restrictions. people are starting to get active again and, and they're very, very concerned about this. it's a very destructive policy that really strikes, i think, the essence of who we are as americans. we had to now and he said, becoming aware of it, but as you out in your text. yeah, there the email that you have. it has been around at least 202040 years. the program has been around. why now? why are we just becoming aware of this type of and that hinge why you're seeing the objection of people going, but it's already in, isn't it? once it's already a part of the agenda? it's almost too late. not really. it's what it was. it was,

it was sort of an obscure academic idea. among some of these various strain college professors, it never came into the mainstream until president mine was elected. and suddenly you had all of these very radical elements enter into the government. and so, you know, it was just one of these, we're no one off things that, that was hidden. and in academia today, it's in every school. it's in every bureaucracy. even the secretary of defense, a spouse is that he looks at all of the white soldiers as being white supremacist somehow. and he sees white supremacy as the as a big threat to america. i'm going to, i was the most conservative member of the general assembly. and yet

in all of the years, and i've been in politics since, since i was riding on a bus with black workman to try to break down segregation. and i did that and all these years i have never met a white supremacy. so i guess there is a big threat, but i have yet to find one. i don't know where they're where they are. well, and that's what you know, we can talk about what actual career rates are in the debate that having, i'm more actually concerned about how this is happening in our education system. and in this regards to this common core, anything that's been integrated and parents don't know. but because you do, as you said, have a history in virginia with the state. sending the states in, at the county received very much a large part of its funding from the state. as in most states, do you know, you can address this on the local county school level, but why was this not being addressed on the state level? why we've seen this being picked up by the state legislatures and taking some of that pressure off of those individual school boards that they're having to take forward. because like you said,

it's across the entire state. it's not just segregated just to out and county. what's happened in virginia now i retired a little over a year ago from the senate. and since then we have seen the democrats take all 3 statewide offices according to the governor. and they have taken over the house. they've taken over the senate. and so there's really no pushback, there's no obstruction, and they've been able to do and to put into place the most radical extreme policies . and one of them is that they have promoted this transgender radical policy. and also they've been able to implement this critical race theory. so there is nothing to stop them. there's nothing that stands in their way. but i think they're facing a huge backlash in the elections that we have coming up this november in virginia.

well, it's interesting that they do have that back. i should do have something stand in their way and i parents and that's engage parents are obviously so. so let's bring it back to the school board meeting that night. why did the crowd do you think react the way they did to the school board on this issue that evening? was it that way the entire time or did they just finally give up and say they had to get the attention? somehow we had about 600 people, 269 had signed up to speak. about 85 percent were pro family and then 15 percent were a combination of rainbow coalition, people and, and black, black lives matter people. they were simply overwhelmed. i mean the, the program i think for in a vast when your a and what happened at one point, there was one of one of their members stood up and said something was rather blasphemous towards jesus christ and the followers of christ. that it was an anger

or people linked to their feet and they, and they protested it. and the school board cautioned and said, well, you can't, you can't speak out, you can't say anything. you just have to sit there and take it. and so we went on, i was about the 50th speaker, and i was very direct in speaking to them and very confrontational, i suppose. and when i finished speaking, i said that it was time that we got rid of the radical gang of sex and the entire room just in the roof off the ro paperwork where jumping edge caring, or people were jumping up on their seats and, and they were nearing speeches, and at that point they, the board of supervisors simply adjourned and slipped out the back door. i

think they felt a little bit intimidated. nobody was going to cause violence. but there were a couple of incidents later on because people said, hey, mark, this is a public hearing. we were asked to come here, we spend hours, and now you're telling us to get out. and so there were a couple of people who resisted leaving, but nobody was there to, to injure any body or that type of thing. so then how do you feel then about the school board calling and law enforcement to help handle the crowd? like said, we saw the picture of the one man. i'm saying, you know, obviously fighting him for wanting to have his 1st minute rights was being both on both sides. you've been elected official, but you're obviously a member of the public in this case. how do you feel about law enforcement being called in under this situation? was it a little bit of an overreach? you know, i've spent 20 years in the why just lighter, and we've had a very heated debates and sometimes very, very liberal groups would, would come and they would raise a little cane. we always dealt with it with

a little bit of flexibility and we would, we would do i'm, i actually have been pushed around one of the hearings by a group of, of abortion activists. and some people got all upset about i should. yeah. you know, if you know what he was trying to kill me, this is just part of the process. you know, democracy is a, it's kind of a kind of a hands on type of thing. so i didn't bother me. and i think these people were alter, a sensitive, they've done everything that they could to try to restrict the ability of people to speak out. and so they were just, just absolutely, to the letter of the law. they wouldn't let the slightest little bit of, of uprising take place. i think it was very unreasonable was very on democratic. and it's not the way that we ever did it in the legislature, either under the democrats or the republicans. that's just not really to treat

people all center like i think there's just reaffirms and why one should never just check a box when you go into the voting box. research is a candidate to their positions on various issues. i think it's critical and that's no matter how small the offices. thank you so much for joining us. thank you. one of the country's largest reservoirs and the west is seeking to dangerously low levels and the effects could impact millions are to correspond tosh. a suite has more on how the drought is drawing up. one of our most critical resources, water experts are warring. the 1st water shortage along the colorado river could be declared later this year. an official say lake meet in particular is experiencing dangerously low levels of drainage, white minerals, or vivid at lake mead were water levels continue to dwindle. the lake has fallen 143 feet in the past 20 years. in experts say the only expect levels to continue

thinking. this is the lowest level recorded since the reservoir was filled in the 1900 thirty's lake meet is a colorado river reservoir. east of las vegas on the nevada arizona border. it provides nearly 25000000 people water. and now water cuts could hit agricultural communities hard, especially farmers in east arizona. a recent heat wave on top of a drought or impact in water levels fast. and it could also affect power to nearby communities forming the lake mead reservoir. the hoover dam produces roughly 2000 megawatts of hydro power. this powered electricity to some 8000000 americans, mostly in california, arizona, and nevada. and now is less water makes its way through. hoover dam, it's megawatts, have dropped 25 percent in the last few weeks. 7 states, nevada, california, arizona, utah, wyoming, colorado, and new mexico created an agreement nearly a century ago in 1922 governing the location of the water rights to specific regions of the last time lake made was completely full,

was back in the year 2000 and some 21 years ago. and officials say we won't likely see those levels ever again. reporting for new shoes and a sweet archie. now just on the other side of the break, we take a look at some recently cables from wiki, leaks, that is shown that the u. s. had issued a war about the will to, to ever ology more than a decade ago. that a more just on the other side of the brain. ah, doing the breathing technique and then take a pool in the hill. and i don't know where it goes back to the break down and in the range, say diamond fields rec tomorrow. d. green

a vision, she me set you a question that he said or you can just keep other than the human russell, but i hope so. but over the, over the years and just sort of the motion learning a lot of stories going on in the course. procure mrs option just for you know that i position me good. we think he might be a soldier because off the boot, she's wearing huge, which pulled up. took a puzzle. was on the shore. so please please.

ah, me one, make sure you know board is and is blind to number please has emerged. we don't have authority. we go to the back seen the whole world needs to take action and be ready people who judge, you know. 2 come crisis we can do better, we should be better. everyone is contributing each of their own way. but we also know that this crisis will not go on forever. the challenge is paid for the response has been massive. so many good people are helping us. it makes us feel very proud that we need together

in our new shockey toes reveals documents for more than 10 years ago, involving at the same time. secretary said, hillary clinton and her acknowledgment of the will on the lab. you know, the same one were coded 19 was rumored to be developed as a lab. we're bioweapon research possibly could be taking place in that cable. clint express her concerns to france, specifically noting the u. s. believe age members would be interested in any information you can share related to china and north korea, specifically related to china's institute of biological products, located in beijing and han to include overhead imagery, analysis of possible to help us get the details straight. we bring an investigative journalist, been one thanks for joining me. ben takes me on. ok. so i want to start with these

documents. who are they between and do you feel like they revealed anything to the public? well, i think they reveal a couple of things. so it's pretty interesting because as we look at this, as you mentioned, this is a very old document. it goes all the way back to 2009. it's a state department table and it's essentially associated with something called the australian group. ok. the australia group, by the way, just so i can help people to understand what that is. if you've never heard that term before, it's an international export control forum. organize to prevent the spread of technologies and research that could be used for chemical and biological weapons. now apparently, according to this cable, there is discussions within a questions essentially that we're going to be asked of certain countries. one of those countries is france, france, apparently before 2009, helped china to set up the hon biology institute, which again is a level for biology lab. and so they were question specific to france, about learning what processes they took to ensure that biological weapons would not be built. they're created there, or that china would not work with other countries who have

a history of creating these biological weapons. now having said all that, again, this is an old document. we are working to kind of verify the validity of it. we have been able to do that yet, but here's what i can tell you. there is no question to this document is from wiki leaks, and to date we can least has never publish a single document that's been proven to be untrue. so i think the likelihood that this is an accurate document, it's pretty high. well, and i have to wonder who actually supplied to wiki lease. that's another question that is always interesting to find out because i guarantee this would not be the only one. but let's actually talk about what was discussed in there. you know, are you surprised? been the biological weapons were being developed by a lab in china, should we, as the public or more importantly, should we surprise that despite knowing the various countries of the world, have the source of technology they've been working on that the world in the united states have not been more attentive in what projects were in the work and where in the various countries in labs. well yes, yes and no. so what's really interesting about this document is that it takes an

honest look at the fact that i can 2000 and there were legitimate questions about what the chinese were doing with those lab and how it would be used. and also part of this cable we should mention, there is a request by secretary clinton's office for aerial photos and surveillance of this facility, you know, who's going in and out of what it's being used for. so there were a lot of skeptical questions about it. the issue was not so much were the chinese creating biological weapons here. this document does not prove that they were doing that though i think it's highly likely that could have been happening. we also know by the way, that the u. s. government through darpa was working on biological weapons through corona, viruses, and spike proteins. and much of that work after 2014 was off short to hon. here's where the rub is in 2009. these were legitimate questions last year in 2020. when there are so many questions being censored off of social media, when there are so many questions being kept out of the news media. hillary clinton, i love,

she has amnesia. remember that the on lab was something she is secretary of state had question personally question about whether or not biological weapons were being created there. and yet when donald trump talks about wilhelm lab and the face of this virus may have come from a lab, she actually was out there tweeting, stop, asian hate. and that this was in a phobic for people to believe this, right. and so this is, i think the rub for most people thinking people would say, how can you 10 years ago, have questions about this lab. and then 10 years later, you're silent. you say nothing which indicates that you're either corrupt yourself or you. this is all again, t, right? you're going to pretend that there's no chance that this lab had anything to do with the release of a virus has nothing to do with a virus that may have been created from there. and instead it came from a wet market, you know, 2 miles away. you will pretend that until the narrative is officially changed. and now all of a sudden, you know, so many folks the media will say, oh yeah, it's very possible that it came from this lab right? because it's not acceptable to say that. well, and that's,

it's been interesting to watch of these past week things that you've been reporting on the past year. i mean, those were some of the details that common sense could tell that this was something that they weren't telling us about originally. but does this actually fill in any more of the details that are still on known about coven? 1900 is background. and more importantly, do we know the responses that were given back to hillary clinton for these? yet, do we know if this actually begins to once again show there's even more of a background that we didn't even think about originally? well, i think it's starting to unveil something that i've been, as you have been talking about for over a year, right? the reality is that this story is not a story of viruses in my opinion, and from the research i've done, it's not a story of viruses that were being studied in order to prevent future pandemic. so this is a story of government funding, biological weapons, and it's the u. s. government that was heavily involved in this. there's a lot of evidence that over $20000000.00 was given by an h to darpa in order to

create biological weapons through corona viruses. and again, this is an opinion, there is a lot of paper trail that indicates us and we know that that, that's the study of that was offshore to on china after 2014. so what i think for a lot of people, if there is just beginning to see this and they're just beginning to say, oh wow, wait a minute, there's also this element to the story, this biological weapons, i would say, yes, some of us have been trying to tell you this for some time, and this is the big problem here, is that it wasn't just an issue of trying to protect the public from a future pandemic. there are questions about whether or not this pandemic was created intentionally, not necessarily released intentionally, whether these, these viruses were created intentionally. and we still need to know the answer to that question. i think what we dinner and now bennett, this was not just something spontaneous that happened in nature that wrecked the world. there obviously was a lot more details, the background to it, and i appreciate you continuing to dive into the subject. thank you.

now with the tow carol and big quickly approaching, we will see a new 1st the 1st transit gender athlete to compete for national team. but the decision has drawn criticism based on some of the athletes previous post r t fronts. that brings us the latest on the left, the controversy, the goal of every olympic athlete go for the gold. but this year and the delayed 2020 tokyo olympics. many are asking if a transgender athlete winds gold. is that fair? specifically, those who've transitioned male to female. obviously that will then allow men to compete in the same category are nothing more than a self declaration. no transgender athletes have ever gone to the olympics to compete before which already is making headlines. but a deep dive until one athletes facebook is raising some eyebrows. chelsea wolf an alternate athlete for team usaid, b m x cycling team is catching some heat for

a previous 2020 facebook post saying quote, my goal is to win the olympics so i can burn a us flag on the podium. the now deleted post wolf says, was in response to former president, donald trump declaring trans girls should be treated as biological males, one playing sports at school. far different from the international olympic committee deciding trans women do not have to compete as men. however, the athlete must show that her total testosterone level is below a specific measurement for at least 12 months. prior to her 1st competition. we've heard noises in the media that the, i say are going to be revising their transgender inclusion guidelines. and possibly even removing the testosterone requirement, but others are applauding the move saying the i o. c has done its research, you've got a sport, you've got a governing body. they have access to science, their access to data,

they know what works for them. do we make evidence based decisions, or do we make prejudice based decisions? that is the simple question. you can't just decide you're a woman and compete with women right? to make believe you can oh, there's no advantage make believe that's make podcast or joe rogan, who has 12000000 listeners, has debated the topic for years. i'm a 100 percent for people being trans. sure. i'm a 100 percent for people doing whatever they want to do. just don't hurt anybody. and i'm caught that same here, but this is just your and make believe town. but laurel hubbard, a trans woman competing for new zealand in weight, lifting in tokyo. 2020 games. so she dealt with the fear of her transition, her entire life hubbard now 43, transitioned in 2012 for anyone else i think and they're revised requirements. the international olympic committee says,

once you declare your gender, you have to compete as that gender for a minimum of 4 years before qualifying for the olympics. however, hubbard says she'll never change your mind, no matter what people think about picking my situation that they just treat people like me just respect. because working article for news use use. i'm fair and friends out and that's it for now for me on to her as scottie and hughes use a hash tag team and d h. and for the show more gala the portable dot tv app for your apple or android device. we will continue this conversation and we will use responding will be net that anybody yet about in the packet. but again,

jack jones is died. i might have to go to the deal, but the most difficult to find the back there are 410 days, right? on the bank, we were going to base water chemical life. and this is going to develop a new treatment, their international market know that these industries that polluting your dis, simply ignore in one days the mother of them. and when we loved them other than the means we lost the in the, the

join me every thursday on the alex simon show. and i'll be speaking to guess in the world, the politics sport. business. i'm show business. i'll see you then me russia, china relations are strong and getting deeper. we are told this is dangerous for the washington lead world. is it? why are moscow in beijing moving closer together? the miscalculations of the washington consensus have anything to do with it. is that china, russia, a liar? made in america? always be polite, never engage with an aggravated or confrontational office. don't get into any conversation to start answering questions. just ask for an attorney. survive and interrogation. you've gotta be ready to stand your ground. definitely

don't want to be going to throw in the jump suit one cuffs you're more likely to walk free. if you're rich and guilty, you are, if you're poor and you got 2 eyes and 2 ears and one mouth. so you should be seen in here and a whole lot more than you're saying if you don't take that advice, usually going to dig yourself before when i would chose the wrong. why don't, i just don't need you to fill out this thing because the after an engagement equals the trail, when so many find themselves will depart. we choose to look for common ground in

the the news stories this disturbing images coming in from the germans city of the clair, a knife wielding attack kills 3 and leave another 6 injured before being detained by police. stop you figures and states resist calls from european power. how is this from germany, for political summits with russia? it is more important to maintain this agenda on russia. ties of unity as division makes us a week and he also split on whether to force british tourist quarantine with france and germany again leading the cold for the restrictions and piling pressure on tourist hotspots in southern europe to do this.