have crazy plantation, let it be an arms race is often very dramatic development only personally, i'm going to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful. a very critical time. time to sit down and talk me

we live in a world where the industry doesn't want any regulation. they just want to put their products on the market the we need a regulation, so we don't do create the things because maybe some time to create things. i don't know, but i'd expect that we have regulation. we want regulation of industry and if we don't have then yes, penalty that's fine. ah, i always say the, the industry makes money. of course it does. if he did not make money. oh,

how many people will be out of work? i more sort of laugh concern the public interest in the public safety is definitely not taking precedent. corporate interest, corporate profit have been getting priority with a regulator. so that needs to change. and one of the big ways to do that is just require trans fancy. ah, we, we locked transparency. we would like to publish everything we use. it's just not allowed. and we can say, we don't care. there's intellectual property rights, but we are, if we publish everything's, it will be breaking belong. ah, they prefer intellectual property to the health of children. ah, if you make money out of selling pesticide,

how much incentive does these companies do? these companies have to get a pesticide, will they make sure that we get use less specified or will they make sure that we use always more pay today, industry pieces spend millions of euros in lobbying to delay regulations instead of researching, substitute, and how to make this thing differently quite frankly, i've been in the industry for a long time. i have never seen a brown envelope. if that's where you're needing to. absolutely never at, you know, the, in the, in the industries interest to bring food to the table that is safe. that it's high quality that is reasonably priced so that you and i and

all of those people working foot in street can also sit and eat good nutrition, food every day and i progress goals risk. you are referring to to accidents, industrial incident. so i see there are people who are injured or people die every time. this happens for industry in general. it would defeat however, those incidents also allow us to improve, to do it better next time and to progress. and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. ah, what is the progress, the progress of moving forward, whatever, and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but because we know how to do something that is useful and that it's good for the people, we should put some intelligence on what the technology and what progress is. i

don't think that progress is ruining the future generation by using tons of chemicals that that can, that can create deeds and you can talk to someone who can use all that stuff with me. oh i use, ah, in law

lou, if we were today with a professional principle problem, you will not have airplanes. empties will not exist because airplane, sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 506-0000 people die with automobile accident. so precautionary principle i think, is a disaster. and yet, what we are now more and more advocating. and you apply these to other culture. we are farming in europe with less substances and north americans or south america with less tools, you know, a heat because we don't use g m o 's. we don't use technology. i mean, it doesn't make sense. we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not.

and in europe, we have this romantic idea of follow that business people would never cultivate something that is dangerous and they would never cultivate something. they don't need. they're just business people and we should get them to the business. and we can't expect them to act in any other way except the only way that would change is if there is a root and branch revolution in the way that we do business. and that would need to involve all corporations all over the world because as long as we treat like

a global commodity, we have a very big problem. and part of that problem is the food will go to the highest bidder. and the highest bidder may not be someone that wants to feed you the highest bidder. maybe someone wants to feed your car. this is entirely the wrong way to look at food. food should be food. i guess i would be nice about making money profit. it's a big corporation. it's about 24000000.

make uniform lens with one group, maximum. it's about corporate control. and it's mostly also economically it's about international markets import export control about companies consoling in far away places. lance, to export commodities is not about food production is not about feeding people. industrial agriculture is a form of mining me and it produces raw materials and then you subject raw materials to various uses and most of the uses go into animal food and textiles. fiber fuel, whatever you have the,

the rest of it can be sold more expensive to some other use. it will go into processed in food processing. so if food necessity always showed a, a business transaction, food is both. yes. so we all need to eat that for sure. but in europe we have a very comfortable full stomach conversation. we haven't had a family in europe hundreds of years, so we have no idea what it means to have the choice between one to also a new month. but we have 10 doesn't really matter to us if we have a gym or tomato which and i think we are unaware of the impact or decisions here have on countries where there is no food. no, a days there's a big confusion between what is the general interest and the interest of industry

because the priorities drug and growth, and he likes growth that drugs are more important than people like if the food industry is successful, it will create more jobs. it will create more value added, it will create more growth. so i don't see why. we shouldn't also fight for the interests of the industry, but this should be a communal fight. modern agriculture read eyes on satellites relies on precision farming, which is the connection between satellites digital machinery and then all of the tools which are available for farmers. unfortunately, i think europe is losing its edge as far as food production in agriculture because

of an overly conservative restrictive regulation and the tradeoff between progress and the risk is not what understood in europe. ah yes, i think europe has a best potential to be the leading agricultural region in the world. we should be the ones who is the best jobs and most invest in hybridization genetic specially started gimme calls machinery. we should be because we have everything we need to succeed. and my fear is that we are not using this potential to its machines. so enable all farmers and the competitive,

the better the trades relations with all these country, the better it is. i mean, otherwise we stay like a fortress and we don't let anything in that doesn't let something out. and you know, this is not the world is not like that. everything is connected. now everything is global. so what we want to see is something very different is a model built on diversity on biological diversity that is, you know, different crops planted together crop rotations. people with diabetes to number raises whether it's not adequately managed or that they have some immune problem. then their risk of infections and something like the coven 19 pandemic, was very bad news. the people diabetes. and we consider it as one of the very high risk situations in terms of people being taped.

the she won't fall simply will thing a little slow, letting them go by susan. well, the longer i was going to go see me when you have a week when you have a meeting in the room initial, authentic steamy and the spelled on the one. let me know which finance was going to look at me. me a list of the nicholas and it's going to you soon. the she was just looking here. when you finish the mental thinking illusion this little thing and gripped on on the, on the financial young hoody an illusion. but you lose it and you could shoot it to

the lower the with the the do we get as humanity, our act together to change and reconfigure it together? how we operate on this planet? we will make ourselves obsolete. that's defining when we have to put the technologies in place where they belong. they have to be then assistant to our goals. well, many people, if i say that would say yes, yes, of course makes sense. but i have not understood that this is not where we are now

. we are now defining future visions through technology lenses. but i want to turn it around. i want that we have a collective vision where we want to be and how we want to design our environment are now foot system that operates within the planetary boundaries. as scientists, i've been defining where it respects the rules of the planet and not vice versa. that we manipulate our planet to the point where it meets our needs in economic terms. for me, progress is continuous improvement of existing things because i have the impression that let's call it the old continent, the europe. he's slowing down

a little bit in making progress. if decision of taking on the motion one day left the other day, right. this is not the basis of the sustainable farming. what progress do we want? are we willing to trade of some of the benefits for some of the risk because we're facing a world which is more and more globalized? so we are up against other parts of the world which do not always play with the same rules. we're living in a very strange place today because we have on the one hand challenges of obesity and overweight and on the other hand with challenges of under nutrition, malnutrition, starvation. there are geopolitical issues and part of the world where there is

less food. and we need to find ways to get food to those parts of the world. either through aid or through producing themselves and to produce more food on the same amount of land. because we can't use more land, we can't use more resources. and ah, for ah, less one see either the momentum without command for much trouble with really sick you can only come in due to the militia. they don't allow us to plug if you

gave them one of them, i'd be and you made equal do you imagine the number of the diseases that are in every me today? it is no due to new viruses or new microbes that have been found in all breast cancer phones. that's not true. so it is due to environment and to currently poisons that are non violent. what are the chronic poisons designed to be toxic initially and spreads all over the place? can you go ahead and hit it because the mom i don't know,

i'm cutting this into you're trying, you're getting young enough. but now mama can senior, also medical know what i said a marla, yoda, it's a tiny community the mama, inflammatory justice equal in totals for my vehicle. are they to kinda put in the cell either i own deficit. they basically got young dogs of course. so look, public a media, deep blue, blue down i. i don't know. commit them or are there been usually i induced part of my game based figure. so or less government never usually hit the market it got out of

the natal. ah, i know the biggest other got the other stuff. just get put in here. there's a chop. it doesn't mean you're located call may be the baby. don't this check wish the total of the initial control more there stairs? yes. my son lost control is this isn't toxic us, but a lot of april fionn by the system. ramona can city finish. i stuck in on peace. have it's just pitch us east of saturday. well then by subject us from the know the say no, i cannot. she don't know, she put on the limit. there must be murder she'll. she'll deal if you will. give him a note. we are super under. no, i can only be out. you know, we are not that much of the kill office. you know the computer chemicals, not bidding your noodle the l m air can see though, getting here. ok,

thompson. mc loading unit by see really sallow. it $31.00. okay. the amount the total weight then it will montalvo will be creamy. mm. all get taken to a brutal seem to be running into marketing as you did for me in to he moved to the she a scene for him. does he look at, you know, that she will, she did it, but she had to get into the cache on the team to get him into to make him a kimono, mac, everybody had more or less holler if you need to model it, you know, must milton when you can let me more in between it and later lunch hour, he will be document tomorrow. no

i can see but a conflict on what kaloni curry was gated ross s in the me she's in the real world but a conference to seem to be well, he'd love to see. do you like to produce a noise blood? will the media know what he'll do? the portal showed us. he lost my lauras. he's a real plasty go my lot. see though, the law in what he only knows how to, in the conflict oper, florals can not say that the fall he will model see, or if, you know, i don't remember either. yes. so all his chemical compounds out made out of petroleum,

petroleum is of fossil fuel, very sticky. and it is by a cumulative because it's a full time compound which last long i . this is why it gave proxy, city leavers and in kidneys and cancer because it gave disease that of the disruption of communication in the cancer. and the 1st reason you have concern is because your cell cannot communicate each other anymore with the rest of the body. and homo diseases, it's the same problem, never diseases like parkinson, alzheimer or even depression. it's the same problem. also immune disease or other mobile formations in the baby's. it's also the same problems are cell cannot

communicate, but this happens on the long term. so that means several years, several dozens of years. so you cannot see because you drink a glass of wine with pesticides or a piece of red with 50. so you can see this effect immediately. many of your opponents to modern agriculture have understood that it's easy to, to scare people. it's easy to, to use fear as a strong emotional driver for a changing body. see and for influencing policy. but sometimes it's in the interests of the anti industry groups to do that, of course, because it keeps them at work and brings in money for them as well. so i think we should look at this from both sides. we sometimes i visit from them recently they invaded this building and they have done so before and through menu or, and threatening letters and stuff. but okay,

that's part of the game. i suppose. we do not. we, you know, when we fight against, when we fight against when we try and dialogue with people that we don't have the same weapons. i sometimes have the feeling that we have both an arrows and they have atom bombs. as soon as there's an n geo, or group of people who are against something, maybe, maybe they balance, maybe they stop using it, maybe of importing. so in terms of development and trust, i think we risk losing a lot of trust as a region when i say industry has the truth. we know what's in our product, for example like that. if i, if i make a product, i mean, you can go home this evening and make a buy area in your kitchen. and you know what's in there and you write it down. that is the truth. sorry, but you know, we are an industry. we know what we put in our products. we can tell you, this is the truth. this is what we put in our product. when i say we have to truth, i'm talking about not talking by philosophically the truth. i'm talking about what we do. we know what we do and we can talk about it.

no pump, don't cover you don't domain delivery. assume there's if it's or less than the 50 seed. they says yeah, they put it out in the in the book please. under ski eldon, it was one of those he battled on mon baker elisa house for a demo. the value show me and lisa need to ship is industry and her new buying sample because you can see for 50 sin, dumont, on the way down on a glass. when that was done a violence, and i was waiting on your, in the, on the, on the the bo most. i think if it does hear me luck,

hope was younger, plenty early coffee dance yet knew that why don't you clarify some on the me the said cache, the president type of seat. the last in the there is a bit hard to the part of the it is said to be for her miss and the park. her degree was at the gym for the yes. used to be for i don't care was issue 30. this is kelly and put it to create your own, declaring the interval on the values cancel. louis for that is which was it. you want to see you under a don't know the hollow because up another is me countries infinity. listen, i need to solve this anymore. so coffee share local now i'm poetry, coffee down here, it is official. i saw the coffee, darcy and paula community chancey. she poor, look them up for a consummate that to not. so i took

a look at their sudden i live. so one of the, our physicians on those carleen days as a school decision for me. so i did have a family ma santo paper ah, look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except when the shorter does that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. the point obviously is to great truck rather than fear i would take on various jobs with artificial intelligence, we'll summoning the theme in a

robot must protect its own existence with the taliban, make sweeping gains in afghanistan. joe biden admits the group is the strongest in decades, but the us president is still pulling most american butare of the country or the end of next you know, mission was a competition that we get to scott, us, some and widen. and terrorism is not emanating from that part. also in the stories that ship the week france refuses to reveal the locations of radioactive waste dumps in l g area 6 decades after conducting new killer tests there, when it was one of its calling on the u. s. has granted the right to appeal.