me, ah, the headlines is our shilling effect till media freedom reaction to a new post by the government that could threaten investigative journalist prison if they expose acres also come to us and talking med flower side flashing, putting the budget to life at the same time ramp up spending on their own private security and as full and cover up quite a tree because no way campbell team is fine for wearing short. instead of the king, the boston, we ask upon the guest, the rules well done to the great women for other schools che misty bull stomach that those funds and they may be different. this

is sexualization of women. ah, hello, welcome. just go on the 10 o'clock in the evening here. moscow, you watching art to national, now locked up for reporting the true fence, the st. facing journalists, if a proposed british flores, past reporters, and their sources could be treated like spies and publishing government secrets could see them jailed for up to 14 years were against the f. as more in the story, a journalists can do as much harm to britain as a foreign spot threw argues the british government in this 66 page proposal, which erases the line between investigative journalism whistle, blowing and spies are all the same under the proposed new secret law, although there are differences in the mechanics of and motivations behind espionage

and on authorized disclosure offenses. there are cases where an authorized disclosure maybe as or more serious in terms of intent and or damage. what's more, the legislation seeks to remove without blow protections, even if what they leaked is in the public interest. and stead it advisors would be whistleblowers to, to go and talk to their boss if they have a moral issue with something that they're doing rather than reveal it to the public that their government is engaged in something immoral or illegal trays is an interesting question. what if it's their boss that's doing something immoral like the health secretary and leaked video kissing a coworker off to he the obliged millions to abide by his soon strict social distancing measures. i understand the enormous sacrifices that everybody in this country has made that you have made. and those of us who make these rules have

got to stick by them. and that's why i've got to resign. officially. this new beefed up version of the secrecy. lou has nothing to do with the resignation of hancock officially, but it would have made the scandal very nearly impossible. see any journalist who shared this with your shed anything that they received problem with blue, couldn't see the sentence of more than a decade behind bars. due to the new way of defining espionage, including obtaining sensitive information, as well as pass it on journalists, whom are simply working. their stories can potentially face up to 14 years in prison by receiving some secret information. there's much more to it. aside from the harsh sentences and the least in the databases of potential threats, there are special powers that the government wants to give itself the power to punish and restrict individuals,

be the journalists or foreign spies. if the government doesn't have enough evidence to jail them, there may be a strong intelligence case to suggest as an individual is engage in hostile activity, but for limited evidence that could be openly used to support criminal prosecution . the civil order could include a range of restrictive and preventative measures, including measures to prevent an individual associating with certain people or from visiting specified sensitive locations. currently, these proposals are being polished off at the foreign office, but could soon be in parliament and make no mistake this, this new secret law would give the most authors area and regimes in the world a run for their money. in the past, we feel blowing and investigative journalism as we know within the u. k. dead. this is one of the biggest wide ranging attacks on grants. freedom, perhaps, since since democracy came to britain,

the definitions in the report are very old indeed. in fact, were journalism doesn't come up once in the 66 page report itself fundamental to the 56 page report, journalists can be more dangerous than spun life. obviously the u. s. is prosecuting fe juanita signs on that as being jack, this secretary or the secretary is backing a consultation document. it's against the journalist that much worse than spies supplies after all, can work for one government or another government or one actor jones. if they publish the material, everyone can see it. so journalists have to be done. that is, is the level of logic and deduction that is being used here by the british government in raising freedoms and rights of the free press here in this country that have been that it created and modified over centuries. so that's, that's quite how dangerous the official secrets act reform looks to be. the mon,

across the atlantic, the us secretary of state has been accused of hypocrisy when it comes to journalism he wants. we can find that using the sounds to face trial for publishing american state secrets, but at the same time, he says that he supports the work of reporters around the world. the upshot of the ongoing trump by the prosecution of julian, a sons in the united states, believes old jordan las, whatever the nationality wherever they are, have a legal duty to keep the us government's dirty secrets. now, i'm sorry, but that's not support. enjoy unless every us media outlets at landber's this comment and reference assange, but they won't because they suck messiah alina. john has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from us government propaganda, oregon voice of america, to agitate for regime change in iran, in the bazaar logic of us empire. she's an independent journalist, andrew and assange is a criminal will blink ins. both came in support of an iranian american journalist

and host of voice of america. she's not spoken. critic of her on last week said that she was the target of a kidnapping plot by a raining intelligence that was foiled by the f b. i. now, meanwhile, journalist and weekly found her son, she spent more than 2 years in the maximum security prison in london. the us justice department has charged him under the espionage act, accusing him of leaking classified information back in 2010 and if expedited to america, he does face up to 175 years behind bars. we discussed this on your situation with all her daniel, it's our, he thinks that no reporter is safe. every american journalist will be under threat . i mean, it's a, it's a, the prosecution of a sergeant, the dagger aimed at the heart of us journalism. and that's what the, by the ministration is doing. and that's what antony. blanca stands for. if the sarge prosecution goes forward, the every journalist will be threatened with

a similar legal charges. and espionage is a very dangerous thing. espionage guy could land you a life sentence and a maximum security prison. so that will definitely have a most serious, chilling effect america as a country that has completely lost the ability to engage in any kind of self criticism whatsoever. it's a, it's a global viewpoint, is distorted by a narcissistic pers national personality on the part of the political lead, which sees everything through a pro u. s. lens. the u. s. is always right. everybody else is always wrong. so the u. s . never persecutes journalists on the other countries to do, but the reality is quite different. now, america is suffering an unprecedented way, violence smash, shootings, and murders with homicides up 15 percent from last year alone. it does coincide

with a huge cut him police budgets backs by democratic party mares over. claims that the force is suffering from systemic racism, but those same officials are also increasing spending on their own police protection kind of morphine reports. one of the causes democrats appeared to be most passionate about last year. the fund, the police, many off affluent suburbs, suburbs have essentially already begun pursuing a di funding up the police, in that they funded school based on housing and the health care. more as their number one priority in many cities in america, over one 3rd of their city budget goes to police. so we have to have this conversation. what are we doing? we made a group, we did not tell them in the apple of police department, but some democratic mares around the country seemed to have mixed feelings. while they did cut the police budget, they certainly did not have

a problem splashing cash on their own personal protection. in 25 major us cities, officials have proposed cutting or in 20 cases already caught police budgets. however, what open the books dot com auditors found was that may as and city officials still enjoy personal protection of a dedicate to police detail costing taxpayers millions of dollars. let's compare and contrast baltimore's mayor shopped a huge chunk off as his police force is spending. we can re allocate funding, making efficiencies in our police department, but he was more than happy to allocate $3600000.00 to his personal protection in 2020, the san francisco mayor brown and even bigger cuts. eric are study and that was one of the 1st to say i'm going to redirect reef funding from the police department to programs and the african american community i instantly i would like to do that. she also gave herself and even bigger budget for her personal guard,

a cool 12000000. now in chicago, the force was flashed all while its ability to ensure safety with question. we can't rely upon the police to provide public safety at the same time, not just the mayor of chicago, but unnamed city officials felt pretty safe in the windy city. they had 70 a $1000000.00 allocated for just that. and here's new york city mayor, bill de blasio, we will be moving funding from the n y p b to youth initiatives and social services. still, he was perfectly fine travelling around the country on a presidential campaign with the security detail that costs $350000.00. now these democratic mayers may feel safe and snug, but a lot of the people they serve don't as violence and crime source. it's so bad that when you look at the recent numbers, more people are dying of gun violence. then of course,

the me use use when people think of defining the police, you're going to be taking away training programs. community programs that are police related and the crime is going to go up its paramount that our residents are . business owners are visitors of the cities are the ones who are protected more than the politicians. so it's, it's a slap in the face of the voting bass, who voted these elected officials in to see their police being the funded, or the, the proposition for them to be funded. but then the privatized boosted the security being bolstered around them. that's hypocrisy. and it's nauseating,

only seems to happen in democrat run cities, the violence, the, the police to funding the the, the misled, misguided public that is lied to by the politicians. this only seems to be an epidemic. it's happening in the democrat cities and the numbers. the numbers prove it defined, the police may sound like a great slogan, but it seems to have been a decision made in the heap of the moment. because judging by their own action, that seems like the personal protection of many mares is something they don't want to cut back on anytime soon. sadly, i think it's dumb. i think it goes back to the political theatre and they, the politicians think that the, the citizens that they represent who are lucky them, the 1st place. they're not going to be catching on to this apocryphal. it's just getting bad is getting worse. it's an ideology that's strictly among the, the liberal democrats, as you can see in the, in the cities. and it's just bad. it, it's nothing more than political theater. as methods arrive,

there are voting based, rally brown, the more rage in the world, a sport at the moment after norway's b campbell team is fined for choosing to wear shorts. instead of bikini bottoms. and the championship match the punishment, though the sparks furious reaction and claims of sexism. this is completely ridiculous. how many attitude changes are needed in the old fashioned matcher? world of international sport? oh, my god, the worst i guess that they just do not understand the quality point once. is that even possible? can you please stop the 4th beginning nonsense at your beach handbook games? it's embarrassing, disgraceful and sexist. your routing buses, port, and your own reputation. make the international handball, federation officials where bikini bottoms for a week. the rules will be changed quickly. why do you force women to to be hands born outfits that sexually objectify and expose them?

come back to the 21st century and immediately bullish. this outdated rules. while the rule still, i male players to wear shorts, but not females. federation spokesperson did admit that she herself did not know the reason for this, but insisted that this issue was not a priority ahead of the olympics. norway, though, was campaigned against the rule for 15 years, and the teams wearing of the shores is a deliberate protest. now it's not the 1st time sportswear has cost control vesee because early this year, volleyball team to the tournament in castle were told to cover up and swap. the key needs to shirts and tries is, although after a protest authorities did back time than this summer's olympics in tokyo cheese to get under way shortly. swim is a currently banned from wearing special caps designed for people with afro hair styles. although that room is being reviewed after a backlash, and then last week, a double paralympic will champion did express disgust after an official complaint that her sprint briefs were actually too short. my colleague, re sushi,

i discussed the rights of athletes with a panel of guests. they should give them the money back and say, get the whole thing. we're going to exercise a bit of common sense flexibility and get in sync with designs guys. it's only just over 1516 years ago that the then president of thief, soccer's, governing. ready organization set black with encouraging female football as to a time skimpy clothes because he felt that it would make them more marketable. this is almost unthinkable to ask a women, a serious women sport contests to abide by laws. the rules that were drawn up some time ago when they weren't offensive, it's 2021, isn't it time that women were allowed to wear shorts instead of bikinis in sport. we change the strong petition. we're well aware of the rules, as you call them, have a ration where one room is because remember,

a precedent for all other schools. if you're going to data sort of thing, you got cooperation with james. it seems that those are the 4 women this chain should come hiding. for this challenge, we need scenario. how many opportunities actually won't change as well room from there, stupid like this rule that can be not abide and actually well done to this brave women that finally, they show the sexism in their federation. they have to stop the thinking that to women's bodies are for the show, and they have something sexual with them. so of course, it's a problem to have a bikini, you know how much you have to move when you play football. the beginning can with wow, you can show more than you want to show. what do you think they should? definitely not. because you'll suffer past and you'll setup for other sports teams. stay post stumps and then pines funds. they

may be different a stunt. maybe it's not a standard, i don't think it's, it's done. i just think it, some bureaucrat who's laying the law down to the fine print we've got to read again is it is a sexualization of women. whether they say it is or not is irrelevant, is if you demand of a woman that she dresses in a bikini rather than sports care, then that is only one way to interpret that. and it's almost what it is preposterous now. almost. it actually is preposterous to try to impose this perverse dress code on women in the 21st century. what i'm not concerned about is all, but is it the path or the pool women's chains of complain? does that mean, but the rest of the che miss all white happy, white, bikini, bottoms baby and the side of the atmosphere by applying in. they find it more

comfortable to where the katie also did. we ever go to know maybe other women and we watch more, you know, football players, if they play with a tight, you know, short so they show their chest. no, of course not. we want the atlas to be comfortable with their plane. we want them to perform their best to come to you in the program. british, this is criticize government rules, forcing them to cancel performances. if one single act to get corona virus will have more in the story, just off the brighten. ah, join me every 1st day on the alex summon show, and i'll be speaking to guess in the world, the politics sport. business. i'm show business. i'll see you then me in

a democratic society with free speech rights, words are spoken freely in those words that catch attention and result in something that is beneficial to all have a place in the market and the marketplace of ideas in those words and ideas that don't benefit society as a whole tend to get discredited or weaned out of the conversation off through the magic of pullman dialogue through the magic of free free. so the us, the thing is that they no longer have the confidence to respect the 1st amendment. they are not a competent nation, they see the rise of china, and they've lost all their confidence. and they're going to repeal that delay the 1st amendment the ah

ah, welcome back and i london theaters the crying foul off for a huge number of performances were cancelled due to cope with quarantine rules including those staged at the west end. that is despite england, so called reopening that was meant see months restrictions lifted, reporting now from the k, his martin entries, it was meant to be the ground reopening with social distance thing and mosques out and see it is back to full capacity. but it's already cut down for several theater productions this week, both to the n h s truck and tre, scheme over it doesn't shows in the west and across the country. i've been forced to shop because the numbers have tested positive towards the i. so they've all been seen by the cobra. fucking out. yeah, government has absolutely stopped paying all of a 1000 and various jobs and have done nothing for the for the last 2 years. they claim to have done with the cultural recovery funds that there's only available to very few people. it doesn't mean the whole of everything and it also includes

museums. they've done absolutely nothing. and it just seems incredibly unfair. that supermarket can stay open and have to close because of an arbitrary pick. the 10 day isolation rule, it's set to remain until the middle of august. that's when those double jobs can don't get, even if they're in close contact with a coven case. but while most businesses can cover those often, now theater is unique, small costs unlimited numbers of the cities mean. it's just a couple of people are told to isolate the show has to close. there's also another unique policy to see it is if one member of a company test positive, the whole production company must isolate, to feel that the government is completely picking on say so all the time. and if you look at something like a football match, we can have many thousands of people that if you look at everything that happens or there's a year and final thousands and thousands of people in close contact with us and faces good. didn't get to looking at all the fact that you can have all the people that wimbledon you can have. just you have loads of people, but the theater,

you just can't have anyone at all. well, the news editor of britain fleeting entertainment newspaper says when it comes to their industry, the rules simply don't work. it's very difficult situation is on lack of going to have 60 people testing negative little stuff that i haven't been able to work for 10 days is just really produces are very good at finding ways around things, but it's costing them money each time and having to reset, or content or hassles, it's very difficult to have proved to be very patient to be very, very strict rather than they can to make sure that the costs. and so when you say the crowd scattering might be very hard to understand why it isn't treated the same credit, given the money, we say bring it in extreme ration,

right? so this semester then picks a, suffered another blow because after being delayed a year, because of the pandemic, a total of 80 athletes due to compete have ny tested positive for cobit. however, despite the country being in a state of emergency, mid spiraling, new infections organizes, do insist, the venues are safe said. even today though several national teams have reported new cases among their competitors, with one athlete actually warning that the infection has now ended, her career will take a organizing committee says it still may cancel the games at the last moment. and that depends on how the var situation develops. we spoke to a sports columnist as well as a japanese doctor on the risks of suspending the lympics for a 2nd time people who say no to the law they want to again, they're being charged as possible. will be afraid to be or may

already need a lot of people backing and the noise in every sense for stage banter law you're going to go ahead go ahead. i mean, i did just probably delete the real blue. i think i actually got to walk to the student because this is going to be, it has to be unique. i think the job i should do, whatever the job is to minimize the risk of exposing transmission longhand you know, the oriented should be so. so just tried and of course people are very willing to welcome the visitors on the other hand and they're very confused by the crime state of infection and transmission. and all this is the measure of the job of the people are opposing to hold, you know,

and then picks all the fears. that instruction will lessen. whereas in frank's grow though, actually each and shows so in a sense, the people very confused and frustrated. i find the online all a thought as you should avoid using the word bird, while horse lovers must no longer talk about filling the conclusion by new york gardening group banned by facebook for mentioning an agricultural tool. that also happens to be a real good word for women. the who's ah

ah ah ah ah ah ah ah ah, ah, ah, ah, just notified by facebook the photo use for all walla walla onions the over the sexual and therefore cannot be advertised to be on their platform. can you see it? you're watching, i'll say thanks for company tonight. that's havanese is looking at so far. don't forget, they've got a website as always, full of stories and you can find that you don't go

through the news when i would show the wrong one. i just don't the rule. yes, to see out the thing because the after an engagement equals the trail,

when so many find themselves will depart, we choose to look for common ground. the eastern half of the united states were going to have billions, if not trillions of periodical to caters interacting with tens of millions of human beings in their back yard. oh, my god. obviously some of the cicadas do not have very high tolerance for alcohol because they are already passing out are 6 minutes to 400. i mean that's

a very satisfying and the max guys are, this is the kind of report. what does the phrase, once this credited limited everywhere mean to you? sounds ominous. let's check in with stacy. right, max. well, a little bit over 2 years ago. in episode 1355 of kaiser report. we covered a report out of china where the chinese government was celebrating the success of their social credit score. and i'm going to cut to that because it's quite relevant in the past week. post this jen, post saki the, the white house press secretary, her comments on what the white house is doing in terms of flagging.