france with the negative sauce, but you don't go in and buy those the headlines and you have a chilling effect on media freedom. that's the reaction to a new role proposed by the u. k. government, which could threaten investigative journalist in prison if they expose a state secret. while reporting the hypocrisy of the u. s. secretary of state, claiming that he defends independent june this world wide while doing everything he can to lock up using the songs for the rest of his life on us democratic party. med prioritize flashing police budgets at the same time ramp up spending on their own private 2 years. ah,

well, can you watch naughty international? no knocked up to reporting the truth sense the fate facing germ this? if a propos, british loyce past report is on their sources, could be treated like spies and publishing government secrets could see them jailed for up to 14 years what it can stiff. as the story a journalists can do as much harm to britain as a foreign spot. so argues the british government in this 66 page proposal, which erases the line between investigative journalism whistle blowing and spies are all the same under the proposed new secret law. although there are differences in the mechanics of and motivations behind espionage and unauthorized disclosure offenses. there are cases where an authorized disclosure maybe as or more serious in terms of intent and or damage. what's more, the legislation seeks to remove with blue protections,

even if what they leaked is in the public interest. and stead it advisors would be whistleblowers to, to go and talk to their boss if they have a moral issue with something that they're doing rather than reveal it to the public that the government is engaged in something immoral or illegal trays is an interesting question. what if it's their boss that's doing something immoral like the health secretary and leaks video kissing a coworker after he obliged millions to abide by his own strict social distancing measures? i understand the enormous sacrifices that everybody in this country has made that you have made. and those of us who make these rules have got to stick by them. and that's why i've got to resign officially. this new beefed up version of the secrecy. lou has nothing to do with the resignation of hancock officially,

but it would have made the scandal very nearly impossible. see any journalist to share this video or shed anything that they received problem with blue. couldn't face a sentence of more than a decade behind bars. due to the new way of defining espionage, including obtaining sensitive information, as well as pass it on journalists, whom are simply working. their stories can potentially face up to 14 years in prison by receiving some secret information. there's much more to it. aside from the harsh sentences and the least than the databases of potential threats, there are special powers that the government wants to give itself the power to punish and restrict individuals, be the journalists or foreign spies. if the government doesn't have enough evidence to jail them, there may be a strong intelligence case to suggest as an individual is engaging hostile activity, but to limited evidence that could be openly used to support criminal prosecution.

the civil order could include a range of restrictive and preventative measures, including measures to prevent an individual associating with certain people or from visiting specified sensitive locations. currently, these proposals are being polished off at the foreign office but could soon be in parliament make no mistake. this, this new secret law would give the most or authoritarian regimes in the world a run for their money pass. we feel blowing and investigative journalism as we know within the u. k. dead. this is one of the biggest wide ranging attacks on grants. freedom, perhaps, since since democracy came to britain, the definitions in the report are very old indeed. in fact, with journalism doesn't come up once in the $66.00 page report itself fundamental to the $56.00 page report, journalists can be more dangerous than spotlights. obviously,

the u. s is prosecuting fe juanita signs on that. as being jack. this own secretary, secretary is backing a consultation document that suggests that journalists that much worse than spies supplies after all, can work for one government or another government or one actor jones. if they publish the material, everyone can see it. some journalists have to be done. that is the level of logical deduction that is being used here by the british government in a raising freedoms and rights of the free press here in this country that have been that have been created and modified over centuries. so that's, that's quite how dangerous the official secrets act reform looks to be remind across the atlantic, the u. s. equity of states has been the keys in a poll chrissy. when it comes to journalism. he wants wiki leagues found shooting a song to face trial for publishing american state secrets. but at the same time,

he does say he supports the work of reporters around the world. the upshot of the ongoing trump by the prosecution of julian, a sons in the united states, believes old jordan las, whatever the nationality wherever they are, have a legal duty to keep the us government's dirty secrets. now, i'm sorry, but that's not support. enjoy unless every us media outlets at landber's this comment and reference assange, but they won't because they suck messiah alina. john has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from u. s. government propaganda organ, voice of america, to agitate for regime change in iran, in the bazaar logic of us empire. she's an independent journalist, andrew and assange is a criminal. brinkman's boasted to come in support of an iranian american journalist and host of voice of america. she's and i have spoken critique of her on on last week said that she was the target the kidnapping plot by raining intelligence that

was foiled by the f b. i. meanwhile, journalist weekly found sanchez spent more than 2 years in the maximum security prison in london. the u. s. justice department has charged him under the espionage act, accusing him of leaking classified information back in 2010. and if extradited to america, he does up to 175 years behind bars. well, we discussed, she sounds you situation with you was that done was, are who things that know reporter is safe. every american journalist will be under threat. i mean, it's a, it's a, the prosecution of a size is a dagger aimed at the heart of us journalism. and that's what the, by the ministration is doing. and that's what anthony blanca stands for. if the prosecution goes forward, the every journalist will be threatened with a similar legal charges and espionage is a very dangerous thing. espionage god could land you a life sentence in

a maximum security prison. so that will definitely have a most serious shilling effect america. as a country that has completely lost the ability to engage in any kind of self criticism whatsoever. it's a, it's a global viewpoint, is distorted by a narcissistic pers national personality on the part of the political lead, which sees everything through a pro us land. the u. s is always right, everybody else is always wrong. so the u. s. never persecutes journalist only other countries to do. but the reality is quite different. how america is suffering an unprecedented wave of violence at the moment. my shootings, murders with homicides up 15 percent from last year alone. it has coincided with a huge cut in police budgets backs by democratic party mares over claims. the force

is suffering from systemic racism, but those same officials are also increasing spending on their own police protection can morphine reports. one of the causes democrats appeared to be most passionate about last year. the fund of the police, many actual suburbs, suburbs have essentially already begun pursuing a de funding up the police in that they fund school based on housing. and they for health care more as their number one priority in many cities in america, over one 3rd of their city budget goes to police. so we have to have this conversation. what are we doing? we may clearly not hold them in the uploads police department, but some democratic mares around the country seemed to have mixed feelings. while they did cut the police budget, they certainly did not have a problem splashing cash on their own personal protection. in 25 major us cities, officials have proposed cutting or in 20 cases already cut police budgets. however,

what open the books dot com auditors found with it may as and city officials still enjoy personal protection of a dedicated police detail costing taxpayers millions of dollars. let's compare and contrast baltimore mayor shopped a huge chunk off of his police force is spending. we can re allocate funding, making efficiencies and police departments. but he was more than happy to allocate $3600000.00 to his personal protection in 2020, the san francisco mayor brown, even bigger cuts. eric are 30 and i was one of the 1st to say i'm going to redirect reef funding from the police department to programs and the african american community. i instantly i was like to do that. she also gave herself an even bigger budget for her personal guard, a cool 12000000. now in chicago, the force was flashed all while its ability to insure safety with question. we can't rely upon the police to provide public safety at the same time,

not just the mayor of chicago, but unnamed city officials felt pretty safe in the windy city. they had $17000000.00 allocated for just that. and here's new york city mayor, bill de blasio, we will be moving funding from the n y p d to youth initiatives and social services. still, he was perfectly fine travelling around the country on a presidential campaign with the security detail that costs $350000.00. now these democratic mayers may feel safe and snug, but a lot of the people they serve don't as violence and crime source. it's so bad that when you look at the recent numbers, more people are dying of gun violence. then of course the

the. a the when people think of defining the police, you're going to be taking away training programs. community programs that are police related and the crime is going to go up. it's paramount that our residents, our business owners, are visitors to the cities are the ones who are protected more than the politicians . so it's, it's a slap in the face of the voting base who voted these elected officials in to see their police being defended, or the proposition for them to be funded. but then the privatized boosted the security being bolstered around them. that's hypocrisy, and it's nauseating. only seems to happen in democrat run cities, the violence, the, the police to funding the, the misled,

misguided public that is lied to by the politicians. this only seems to be an epidemic that's happening in the democrats, cities and the numbers. the numbers prove it defined, the police may sound like a great slogan, but it seems to have been a decision made in the heap of the moment. because judging by their own action, that seems like the personal protection of many mares is something they don't want to cut back on anytime soon. sadly, i think it's dumb. i think it goes back to the political theatre and they, the politicians think that the, the citizens that they represent, we're lucky them the 1st place. they're not going to be catching on to this apocryphal. it's just getting bad. it's getting worse. it's an ideology that's strictly among the, the liberal democrats, as you can see in the, in the cities. and it's just bad. it's nothing more than political theatre as message arrived. there are voting based rally and brown. the more south africa he's trying to recover from his most devastating rights and decade

sparked by the jailing of the former president, jacob zoom up, the chaos has led to more than 200 deaths sizes of arrests and an estimated $2000000000.00 in damage. but like when steve fit, the situation could deteriorate further. so let's have a quick look now at high recent events have unfolded in the country the highway of death go for. that's what it looks like down. yeah. if you carry on further down the road, because burnt out recalls, and the roads abuse and everything. factory the burning of the burning. ah, you know, the,

at the moment you offer to this company, there's one tune save, right? and this is the only place that now we're getting food from. we just stood out there to protect our families. well, the former president, jacob zoom was sentenced to 15 months in prison for contempt of court after he refused to appear before additional inquiry. investigating corruption during his 9 year room. now we spoke to him, his son, who's been accused of instigating the recent violence and allegation he denies. it's unacceptable what has happened and i'm talking about the level of devastation and destruction, vandalism, to, to property. and just the want and looting is something that should not be celebrated, should be denounced, which i have done. and i'll continue to do so. being

labeled as is one of the people, one of the instigators and not officially so much as making that other circle around social media commentary and some of them use networks, which is the 1st thing from the truth. if you look at the basis of those allegations, that's completely baseless, you have certain video clips that have my voice can image which, which are real. but i'm taking taken out of context in relation to the video in its entirety and the message that i was trying to, to put across. so if you look at what i was saying, and i was saying it was done at a time with the beginnings of it. but it happened that this was 3 days into, into what had happened in our country. so it was my way of trying to deal with the situation by 1st denouncing it. and secondly, denying my involvement in the real issue. the issue is the, the high levels of poverty and things that can either lockdown,

exacerbating the level. because now you've got more people falling into the bracket of unemployed and, and district and hungry. he's been charged in arrangement with out of the federal and i find that very, very, very suspicious. and the reason i say that is let him out, let him go through the, the rigmarole in the processes of a child, whether you like him or not. who knows? you might, he might end up getting 15 years or not 15 months, but you know, you need to go through that process and can just be a process that's ignored. you watching are you still had few. this is criticized government rules, forcing them to cancel. performance is the one single actor gets corona virus. we'll have a look at the details just after the me,

i the ah, me the democratic dominated select committee investigating the events of january 6 on capitol hill has been constituted. it will start proceedings next week. would be merely political theatre, a proverbial lunch from food buy on national display. one thing is for sure these

proceedings will reflect the political divisions, fagley finding the truth looks to be a secondary import. the. the news. ah, welcome back. now one of america's most powerful politicians speaker, nancy pelosi has been cashing in on big tech investments, which she just happens to also be regulating well as the revelation from a new probe and breaking it down is really protractor. well, did you know that the top democrat in the house is also a top notch stock trader, a true talent together with her husband, a bit of pelosi math for you, her personal? welf. stand that nearly $100.00. 15000000,

which is quite an increase from 41000000 in 2004. good for her. one very important disclaimer. i'm in no way saying madam speaker, is doing anything wrong or breaking the law. but i'll be moving on to a combined lesson of pelosi math with the touch of pelosi ethics for that. let me refer to an investigation by journalist glen greenwald. much of their that below c's added wealth is due to extremely lucrative and like you decisions about when to buy and sell stocks and options in the very industries and companies over which pelosi as how speaker exercises enormous and direct influence. oh, there's so much context to dig into. it turns out close to 3 quarters of the couple of stock trading over the last 2 years has been in big tech. and i'll tell you what, right at this point the us lawmakers are in the midst of revamping legislation that

could really make life much more difficult for the tech joins. they're working on something called the anti trust reform. that would propel market competition while pig install on monopolies. so have a guess which super powerful executive has made a personal call to madam speaker, to talk the house out of proceeding with the reform. apple. c o, tim cook. and what about the company in which the clothes he traded most often? it's apple trading has always been controversial because it's basically a victimless crime. no one is hurt by it. and the only argument against that could be made in the one that has been made is that a reduces faith in the securities markets. this entire episode where congress has been engaging what the rest of us would be thrown in jail for shows that it's regulators and congress not markets that are not worth the public trust. nancy pelosi may well not be receiving any insider knowledge from the companies she's regulating. even if she does get some of it, maybe she never uses it when trading,

but she's apparently very close with these big tech ceos. in the meantime, a bill that supposed to fix a loophole and the legislation that favors these very knowledgeable executives has been revived on capital hill. corporate executive shouldn't be allowed to trade on significant information ahead of the public and invest those. but that's exactly what's happening because of this legal loophole. hoops. so for god knows how many years big bosses with close ties to very powerful people on the hill have legally been able to get away with what looks very much like insider trading. is started. trading is supposed to be handled by the security securities exchange commission. but since those officials are approved by congress, and since congress makes the laws that apply to itself, where every year americans are treated to the spectacle of congress giving themselves raises, for example,

it's reasonable for americans to strongly doubt that anything lasting is going to be done inside trading can be regulated and it has been for the common person yourself, myself, but like so much else, congress does. and the security regulators do. they enjoy the privilege of exempting themselves. busy when and how they watch, whether it's fair to allow lawmakers to get richer from buying and selling stocks because they know stuff that nobody else does. has long been up for debate in america. well, experts often come to the conclusion that current laws don't give prosecutors a chance. london theater is crying foul off for a huge number of performances were cancelled due to co quarantine rules including those states, the west end masses despite england. so called reopening that was meant to see month restrictions lifted force from the u. k. his martin entries it was been to be the ground reopening with social distance thing and mosques out and see it says

back to full capacity, but it's already cut down for several theater productions this week. thanks to the m h s truck and tre, scheme over it. doesn't shows in the west and across the country. i've been forced to shut off members have tested positive towards the i. so they've all been seen by the cobra. fucking government has absolutely messed up all of a 1000 and various jobs and have done nothing for the for the last 2 years. they claim to have done with the cultural recovery funds that there's only available to very few people. it doesn't mean the whole of everything and it also includes museums. they've done absolutely nothing. and it just seems incredibly unfair that the supermarket can stay open and faces have to close because of an arbitrary paying. the 10 day isolation rule is set to remain until the middle of august. that's when those double jobs can don't get, even if they're in close contact with a coven case. but while most businesses can cover those often, now theater is unique. more costs and limited numbers of the cities mean, it's just a couple of people are told to isolate the show has to close. there's also another

you didn't policy to thesis. if one member of the company test positive, the whole production company must isolate, to feel that the government is completely picking on say so all the time. and if you look at something like a football match, we can have many thousands of people that if you look at everything that happens over a year and final thousands and thousands of people in close contact with us and faces get didn't give a looking at all the fact that you can have all the people that wimbledon, you can have, just you have loads of people, but the theater, you just can't have anyone at all. well then you said it's your britain's leading entertainment newspaper to say when it comes to the industry. the rules simply don't work. it's very difficult. situation is on work. i'm going to have 60 people testing negative stuff that i've been unable to work for 10 days is just really produces are very good at finding ways around things, but is costing them money time and having to reset or cold or hassle is. it's very difficult to have proved to be very safe patients to be very, very strict,

and they can to make sure that it's incorrect. so when you say the crowd scattering might be very hard to understand what is treated the same as crazy when even monday we say bring it in extreme radiation. right? and 11 victims families, right? ranged over media claims at the capital, right? was worse saying it's a deliberate dehumanization of their tragedy for political gain. i would like to say january 6th as burned into the american mind as firmly as $911.00, because it was that scale of shock to the system. january 6th was worse than 911

because it's continued to rip our country apart and give permission for people to pursue autocratic means you cannot equate the loss of people like 911 to generate 6. it does raise a lot of concern for the victim and survivors from the handful of people who suddenly died on the record of jerry 6 more than 3000 people that died on 911. that makes no sense and not counting the people, the hundreds of thousands of people that i knew rack and i can use them because our incarnation to the work because of 911 doesn't make any sense. well, the 911 terror attack claimed almost 3000 lies as we heard and left many more injured relatives of victims believe that comparing it to other violent incidents time plays. what happened, however, some politicians do find it appropriate to use the same rhetoric while speaking about the capital rise. today we've had a national trends,

ordered that the full resources, the federal government, to help the victims and their families. and conduct a full scale investigation to hunt down and find those folks committed. again, january 6, with one of the darkest days in our nation's history of so now 3 times, it is imperative that we establish the truth of that day and ensure that the task of that time cannot happen and that we root out the causes of it all william pervy guys says again that the tragedy of 911 is being used and manipulated by politicians to pursue political gay. they have full of people that handles the government. i have used many 11 successful every time that they put year that the school happen again. our tragedy has been use manipulated by the

american psyche for every single act that needs to be changed. it is the same thing or the same play and the same drama play over and over again using 911 plots, d u b or 911 for everything that is used to change last week. stablish new requirements. the politics of the feeder is very, very effective. they using the plot of $911.00 to create a political agenda. you're watching aussie international taxi company this evening . we'll be back again with more stories in the headlines about 30 minutes. oh, it's like you're walking down a street in a town and in the store, windows are negative. in depression, you tend to go into the store and buy those thoughts and take them home as if

they're years. in mindfulness, you walk down the street, you still see the sort storefront with the negative thoughts, but you don't go in and buy those. ah, [000:00:00;00] mm . welcome to the alex, i mean, sure, well, we examine the consequences of partis johnson's freedom day. this monday when made a meeting, corporate restrictions were lifted. although this just applies to england, scotland, northern ireland and then we'll are falling westminster and there relaxation of