it's, it's basically going to be a democratic show. ok, and i use show purposely here and as we're going into this here, it seems to me that as i said in my introduction, the truth seems to be quite secondary because it looks like both sides want to claim a cover up being done by the other side here, i mean, is this exercise worth its while? unless you just want to in, in plain passions, go ahead in milwaukee. it's really not worth while. it's not, not this. why not because it's become such a part of the show. you know, i think i think some of the republicans, jim jordan included, even kevin mccarthy want to get to the true. they talked about wanting to truly understand what happened. why it was that more security was not added. why security was turned down by the mayor. you know what, what the democratic leaders know what the time did they know of any other security threats. and so these are, these are questions that if you truly believe that this was the horrible,

violent and direction and want answers you'd want answers to all of these questions and want to get to the bottom of it to make sure that never happens again. so, democratic leadership, this committee doesn't seem to want to do that. that's why it doesn't really matter . because even if people might be concerned about what happened january 6th, you don't want to understand even dinner happened america. many the i've talked to if they want to just, you know, not really going to care this much about this investigation because it is, it is so part of that americans are kind of tired of the partisan political things in congress. but if there was something that was bipartisan, that kind of hooks up the ears of your typical ordinary, reasonable american, regardless of party affiliation, because they want to be bipartisan to get the truth. this is just simply not that already can you address that? because there's so many questions that haven't been answered. i mean, the simplest, easiest one to ask is who killed ashley babbitt and it's 6 months on. i mean, why don't we know the person that did this?

i mean, the only person that was shot during this entire thing and one side call it in inter insurrection, but it was a trump supporter that was murdered inside the capitol. i mean, these are very basic questions that don't seem to be being addressed. ok, cuz i want to know what happened and people that broke the law should be punished. go ahead, ari. so i don't think you do, and we can say here in air as much conspiracy theory as we can. but bottom line is that those who attacked our capital on january 6th, or thugs and domestic terrorist. there ladies in georgia and one in colorado, wisconsin, the democratic party, president biden, one, both states fair and square. i'd like those ladies to actually say that that the president of the united states is actually the elected and legitimate president they want. and they won't. i'd like them to say the president, by the one day let me finish. you didn't talk about what we want to be fair talking

about where you're going to get finish. it's not my 1st rodeo, so you've got to let people finish. secondly, on january 6, after months of this fraction of a man named president donald trump, who lost the election and he would refuse to step down. we have general milly, a 4 star general man. if you look at a stripes, that's every 6 months served overseas. that man was bored about a crew. that man was worried about a crew by a man. trump, who was unwilling to leave, that he sent his thugs and i use that word purposefully and wilfully thugs. to store the u. s. capital, you know what? the democrats. 5 and republicans agreed in may on a non partisan independent commission. the republicans backed out led by mccarthy, kevin mccarthy, minority leader of the house. then again, they sent 5 members. not by the way this the of the 7 numbers selected by speaker nancy pelosi, one is republican list change by all means if you want to question list chinese

credentials, then you may not even be a republican here point 5 guys, jim jordan, jim jordan, you know, what, when alchemy can laugh, yeah, you can laugh because you don't have much of an argument, but you know what? one outcome pony al capone's cannot question. william ness is partisanship. you don't appoint an arsonist to investigate the fun so. so no, that's that. so you guys lot yet. ok, so nancy pelosi isn't partisan. your whole argument collapse or ok? that's right. i want to jot. i want to get everybody. hey, i want to get everybody in the program when every be fair and debbie hasn't said one word yet. debbie, you have the floor, go ahead. well, to begin with, i will answer his question. tell me what the trees were before i admit that to meet you, joe, and here his caretakers won the presidency. i'm in georgia. i know that election fraud is being uncovered as we speak, that we're the calls is bologna. that's a lot. that's

a lot. if you go on air regarding debbie, debbie didn't interrupt you. alright, debbie interrupt. you going to stop there because i live double standard of democrat. why year there were 25 people killed and she and b l a. m drive. yes. a federal court out in portland, oregon was set on bar in. try can over during the hearings, on not confirming brett cabin, all democrats invited the capital building one by january instead of about january 6, one your thoughts? okay. all right, i'm going to jump in here, but are, you didn't talk about that already. you didn't talk about january 6 either. ok, so let me go to jennifer. talk, go to mission. let me go to the other part of the commission, but race baiting. hang on to work. ok. race baiting. ok. we're talking about

january 6, jack jennifer here. why doesn't nancy pelosi want to be asked hard questions because it was she was in charge of the security of the capital and, and the sergeant at arms requested 5 times for more assistance and he got crickets and then he got fired the next day. go ahead, jennifer. whenever we look at is the answer to this question because it might show some democratic ordination might at least show some kind of knowledge. i mean, that's the only reason why somebody that claims to want to get to the bottom. what is actually research? i understand why, why democratic why, why did the left wing is very angry. i understand why they are perpetuating this guilty until proven innocent thing because it gives that we what done the crap did during the molar investigation during the molar workshop. when john gill, can you prove it was turned out to all be a lie about this russia collusion hope and because of that, you see why the democrats are your thoughts you're guilty until proven in that. i

want you to demand it because the fact that they don't have the fact they don't have the investigative material, they don't have the answer. and that's exactly why they're so angry and they want to shut everybody down and interrupt anybody have. no, they don't have a case in america in the legal system. ok, there's something called bias and motivation here. and if a witness have bias, lyrical motivation or something else, their, their, their testimony is not credible. that's what's happening here is that they want to how to be biased subcommittee. i'll tell you one thing about the credentials for latrina, your credentials are that she is not acting in favor or her constituents. they're showing that their own poll numbers and why don't need, i don't care about how many years. in fact, that's what making the majority of americans. i guess you about people that have been involved in politics for so many years. well, you've heard of the lot that don't want to get through and that there are calling people guilty until proven innocent. that is not the american way. and we'll have everything right. you know, what are you can start asking questions about about who want and demanding the

people acknowledge they're biting one when you can go back for years and make sure the democrats show that from back was really 12016 henry back. and i tried to leave it for hillary. can jennifer, you know what? you are a lawyer. you got a lawyer. i know better idea please. we're talking about things. you have no idea what you're talking. don't how skills, roach or feed it. ok, i'm conceding from conceited guy. can see that the already what you know, he hasn't got his buck kicked. ok. we're talking about january 6. i have think he's going to hang on debbie. hang on please. okay, ari cuz i want to give everyone equal time here, ari. there have been reports that the f, b, i might have embedded snitches, and under cover personnel here. is that something you would like to learn more about? because we did have a, we had, we had a governor and i let me find out anything i already i have for the end. you have to

let me ask you and there, where would you like to have it out? man, i have an offer. yeah. but if you came to my question, if you don't, absolutely. now you're trying to tell your audience that you know, i knew that there could be governor of michigan. there was an allegation that what's her name, what's her name whitmeyer janet with the are good. okay. go ahead. well, you don't have to be condescending. i'm trying to be civil rights. you're talking to do i not part of the conversation fitting. what are you talking about? what you don't have to insult everyone, your disagreement, your job, your time american democracy. i am not, i want to find out what happened because i don't know what happened. we all want to know what happened. what can we do? what's the f b? i always has informants to even alludes to the idea that the f b. i instigated this one, people with confederate flags. those are trader flags,

trader flags, trader flags. i see that 3 times and capital to say that the f b, i instigated that one is actually still. so does that mean carrying a flag is a crime? is that with no, it's a crime, you know, it can, you can go bern, flags, but it carried to carry a confederate flag, makes it look like an idiot. i will, i wish you could focus all of your venom on that topic to hand. i wish i did research now, by the way. i mean, we're either in moscow. ok. i know you're sitting, i'm doing that already. i mean, you really want to proceed just knowing everyone. i have plenty of arguments and so i guess you haven't been here night. we're going to go to what short, quite after the break, i'll continue our discussion on january 6 name with our news. the me

the board is why you're walking down a street in a town and in the store, windows are negative. in depression,

you tend to go into the store and buy those thoughts and take them home as if they're yours. in mindfulness, you walk down the street, you still see the sort storefront with the negative thoughts, but you don't go in and buy those, gosh. ah, the me ah ah, i use

the one who tries to do is really to leverage on the knowledge of this partners from developed countries. and they offer free of charge services to both. but it was so we asked, this is sort of a broker 12 things from developing and emerging countries to get access to state. because clearly one of the issues, one of the show stoppers is the cost of the launch in the operation. the ah, welcome back to cross software. all things are considered. i'm peter labelle. remind you we're discussing january 6th in the

before we continue our re, our 3rd guest and the program has left. he had a very big problem with my questions and it personally insulting me. so i found no other reason to have him continue on. the program already has a right to his opinion and he'll continue to express them. and i respect that. i wish i would have respected other people's opinion, debbie, let me go back to you and let's get back to the facts here because the 1st part of the program was this very turned in the wrong direction. i want to talk about january 6th. one of the problems that i have here is the why someone like representative jordan and banks cannot be part of these proceedings. i mean, it seems to me that they want to make sure all the lives cheney represents the opposition here. i mean, this is quite farcical and we know would lose if he has a right to her opinions. that's fine, but she's not representative of her caucus. go ahead, debbie. yeah, i actually,

i had a problem with that. i think if i like republicans should walk away from the committee and exposed to them for sham then it is. i was not in the capital in january 6 because i actually called cobit so i had to stay at home, but i had family, very good friends that were there. and a lot of the reports that i am hearing or that the capital, the police and folks were waiting people to go in. the talk to my family, picked up the phone called them on their cell phone. and i said, you guys, okay. and they did not even know what was going on by way outside the capital. and they told me later that they did not go inside the capital though, even though capital replace were waving their me because i felt like it was a try out to go. since i found out there were trouble i called over and

that is a problem i, you know, and to may, you know, who shot ms. barrett, that a, that was shot there. 9. so whether been released everywhere, what are our intelligence agency and they are covering up there is a double standard in the way that they're trading. what happened that the capital in the way that they traded the of the extreme once. 2 the b l a m and then t for protest, the f b is clearly politically motivated. and i had to actually was interview with them for ya contacted him. and he did not even go in the capital and he was able to crazy, did not. but he said, i, you know, people have a major issue with the why the investigation and the why you're trading the people

own january 6, then the way you treated the b l a. and you know, and 24 protest. there's a double standard there for. yeah. i told him, well we take orders what to investigate and how to proceed from a top. so in our jakes, i hate this because i'm a patriotic freedom loving american little problem. my debbie, you bring up a really good point. let me go to jennifer. here. i mean, it seems to me, this is a gambit to discredit tens of millions of people that voted for donald trump. i mean, it seems to me a vast assault on people's constitutional rights here and, and also the 2022 is right around the corner. and the specter of trump running again, i think this is what this is about. they want to nip it in the bud right now and to intimidate people. i mean that couple in it last, alaska, you know, they didn't have to be polite with these laptop, but they would need,

they knocked down the door they, they handcuffed him. i mean, the, or what kind of due process is that, i mean, i find that quite chilling and people that committed loitering. i mean, is you, should you be in prison for 6 months without proper legal advice? i mean, that seems an assault on so many different ways and it, you know, a ring in regard to our guests. the left is here. i am very adamant. i want to know what happened and let the chips fall. but we have to know what happened. honestly and not to have this into this political theater. go ahead, jennifer, and that, that's exactly the issue that i think the republicans in congress, which trying to get to jim bang, jim jordan being appointed by kevin mccarthy to the committee. because kevin mccarthy know that the majority of republicans, majority of conservative in america do not change or on people only on the center or they want. they want her out of office next turns. so, you know, knowing that he brings in people who want to get to the truth. jordan is very good

at investigation and you know, the legal system, well, you know, constitutional norm, well, yes, obviously he's conservative, but at least he has truck constituents. and many people, even people that were present when shrunk, spoke on january people that had no part in any violence at the capital. and so that would bring some legitimacy to that. the democrats want none of that. but i have a real problem with a lot of and there are a couple of points here. so we were talking about a court of law investigation trying to find the truth. i mean, the legal system in america, the legal system in this country and other than in your gym when you get evidence. and so need somebody who i wasn't there january, i wasn't, you know, present. i of course, i know some people that were most that didn't go inside or only didn't go inside, but a lot of it i got from, from social media, from videos i have seen more videos posted on social media,

not nice media course. those are blocked down more videos and assuming you mean if we will, that those videos are legitimate that they haven't been edited on days or videos from at least 7 to 9 different people. different perspective showing the same thing . you're looking at sort of trunk. we're trying to trying to care people a way that we're breaking down windows, trying to stop people from going in your video that are capital please fighting people and so different direction. by the way, the 1st thing you should be doing is investigating the capital who is not already noticed heroes asking why they invited school and where they are part of this, your video, the capital leading people into the room, into the house chamber and some of the major room, so i'm seeing multiple, i think 4 videos, 3 from different people that 4 videos. but pulling up while trumpet speaking on my way. when near the capital national mall with people getting out and she and to

trump here. why is it so hard to submit a conspiracy there? these are actual videos where i sitting in the law a judge will be saying, this is what i see with my eyes. now again, these are the video perspective, but this would be considered some kind of evidentiary testimony was legitimate that we could question not just being the war traitor, you're asking no question. you know, was infiltrated, you're in people, be alone. movements that were treated by people that have absolutely turned violence and so we should get to the bottom of this. why did these narrative, why are people so quick to just this narrative. 3 and label others, because because they're scared because one that sure, sure where to actually come out. it's going to show that there was some democratic or knowledge and that's, and that's something that we need to get. the bottom of this has now been painted directions. what part, what part to democratic leadership play in next?

and why is why and why still be perpetuated? because it still being perpetuated that there were actually there were actually multiple gas, the capitol police, off the jersey because of the insurrection. because that's not sure that's actually been bombed by medical report examinations, legal documents for filing. the only person that was intentionally killed that was murdered, that gave was trunk order and military veteran ashley babbitt and that we have to get to the bottom. if you're looking at people on social media, journalists that are having to get to the bottom of it doesn't mean media officials will not do their job. well, i don't debbie and jennifer brings up probably the most important point of this whole discussion is that you were being attacked because we ask questions. so what's wrong with asking questions? i tell you resolve problems. ok. and i think it's really quite interesting before jim jordan was pulled off. he was on fox news the night before or even on the same day. and he telegraphed what he would like to ask questions of the select committee

. and then hours later he has cut because it looks like nobody wants to answer the questions that he wants to ask and we're asking on this program. go ahead, debbie. i totally agree. i mean, what's wrong with asking questions? and i will just imagine next year when the republicans take control when they have seen it here have health hearing into different things. and i actually try to democrat leadership, the people that can be placed on their committees. that's wrong. the democrats would be screaming at the top of their wall. and this is a question that i want to know. if you recall, i talked about weapons insurrection. it was called the insurrection from the beginning, i insurrection, if you want to overthrow the government, you're going to have weapons and farms with you. there have been non recovered.

this thing was a sad up from the began and as i said, folks on no did not go in there camp a little because they, they failed. it was suspended for the police to be motioning for them to come in. and i think the democrats do not, and i really think our intelligence agencies, the f b. i do not want a close look into what really went on because they are afraid what will be discovered. and i think that something that's telling me, and i think it's a double standard, as i said, it's a big double standard out there. what happens in, in 09122009. i was one of the ones to help organize a massive march. and they say there were a were 1000000 of us player, their words, and we did not try to take anything we were peaceful. we picked up our garbage and

we left an update. this is just the democrats in therapy. i don't want to close the but look at what really happened because my, some of their and for much may be some democrat act and this will be discovered as being infiltrators in engine them on, but on. definitely a great place needs to be looked at. why they were motioning people to come in that capital. yeah, jennifer, i'll give you the last 40 seconds here. go ahead. well, you know, back to one of the points you were making earlier about the kidnapping label. if you're there at all, they watch it, but i think we'll kind of over at this point. you can't just somebody names every time on the playground. if you see your argument is getting the bond to the movie, like when i take your ball and go home. okay, these are conspiracy theories anymore. the actual court filings and court documents,

and one of the court filings in court documents in the whittemore governor whitmore case of michigan. it was showing that these people feel like they were set up like they were given goals by the f. b. i informant, forgiven. goal suited to these people and well, i have to, i have been here and we were brought out of time here, but i never thought i would suggest go to buzz feed to have a fascinating story on that. ok, what happened there? all right, i want to thank my my guess in atlanta and in milwaukee when i think our viewers for watching us here at our tc you next time and remember cross ah ah, i the eastern half of the united states were going to have 1000000000 trillions of periodical cicada is interacting with

tens of millions of human beings in their back yard. oh my god. obviously, some of the cicadas did not have very high tolerance for alcohol because they are already passing out. are 6 minutes to 400, a very satisfying and oh right now there are 2000000000 people who are overweight or obese. it's profitable to sell food that is pricey and sugary and healthy and addicted. not at the individual level. it's not individual willpower. and if we go

on believing that never changed, that industry has been influencing very deeply. the medical and scientific establishment, ah, what's driving the obesity epidemic? it's corporate. me look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except when the shorter that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. the point obviously is to create truck rather than fear i would take on various jobs, artificial intelligence real summoning the demon the robot must protect its own existence as exist.

ready ready quintinella class i may often the said it was just that i felt blue book truly i suppose the there's always more use to meet the teacher could contribute usually. so which and practice and what gone. yeah. cuz we knew from the moment they cheated out of

luck on the none of my new middle charges on the cancel the olympics. that is the cry of protesters claiming the tokyo games will cause a wave of new coded cases. more than $100.00 people linked to the event have already tested positive amid concerns. but this is just the tip of the iceberg. also, this, our questions are raised over the decline of what was one of the most powerful navy in the world. as it transpires, the just one, the british naval destroyers currently fully operational and following a recent wave of protests into bug you, i can poses a new round of sanctions against the caribbean. nation as the by the ministration shows no sign of backing down on americas long time. right.