or there is any involve more than that. it's about being sort of envious of something that may not exist and is also really tied to the fact that as humans, we want to be part of the crowd. ah, the wall of shame, that was the core p t spells out how some in paris have come to view the parish suburb. it's up in arms over the construction of a ball designed in theory to keep drug addicts out saying it's inhumane. and practice only makes things worse. it really feels like a zombie apocalypse. plus we have feet assaulting soul someone to one side like animal. if it's a long tradition you will to segregate only canadian military, choose to saw the panoramic. it's a chance to test the propaganda on citizen. according to a troubling army report. the us senate has rose facebook after it's leaking port

suggest the social media giant could be harming children's. well be here. ah . i live for moscow, this is archie international. well, he's a ted on calling bry went into the program 1st, the angus mounting and a paris suburb over the construction of a wall designed to keep drug addicts out. but instead of solving the problem, residents say that it's actually made matters worse. that has turn the area into a living hell shall to do better. he takes up that story. the writing is on the wall quite literally the wall of shame. that's what the graffiti spells out. and that's how some in parish have come to view this, this barrier has been built to hide one of the cities, ugliest problems. crack addiction, full month,

drug use is turned hawk. it will in the 19th, decent paris and the surrounding streets into a living nightmare for locals. now they have be moved to around this location. meaning that the problem haven't been tackled. it's just bought a new set of glucose to deal with him and he'd really feels like a zombie apocalypse movie. last week we have faced assault after assault. at the 1st, my neighbor is still in hostile after trying to catch a drug addict who robbed him. he was beaten on, noel says, this neighborhood has a long suffered problems, but this addition of more than a 100 drug addicts on the doorstep only creates greater insecurity. the few that's been done. yeah, we are almost a breaking point, is it? there's a feeling of nervousness violent. we think about it everyday, even to all myself with protective equipment. it's such a take us a taser or a but why? because just last weekend there were 5 fight that happened on friday,

then saturday and sunday. they just didn't stop. we have drug addicts who come here every day because they need crack. this war was hastily built with the authority saying that it was necessary to protect glucose from the drug users. but it happened to walking around in the neighborhood. we have seen everything from spilling over into commercial areas and drug deals, taking place openly in the metro is mounting here, locals, all protesting against the fact that they have essentially been that door said just laugh. i'm angry because these people i've been treated like animals, we countries and people like that. we can just move them to place further away from the very well known color. why are we angry today? because of everything that's happened well with being attacked is getting worse and worse, women are being sold it threat and we must find

a solution to the problem and we find that counselors, there you go, we have to do something. so you don't want the real people to good neighborhood that we are moving them to areas and all ready have difficulty was up. they just shifted the problem a few blocks away. instead of building the infrastructure to accommodate the people about the sun. acceptable. so they'll call left, we are angry because instead of taking care of the deprived migrant population, we put them to one side like animal. it's along western tradition the most to segregate new comment, to put problems to one side instead of helping them. it's nothing new. the fascist were very good at safe faith in the medical supervision have been approved by the government. but every time a location is projected every physician from people who live by some lightening the plan is putting in the number many schools

injury children cool. nice things that are dresses if it's like a logical and also the psychiatric needs. there are about a 130 and a 150 men and some women living in a kind of shanty town on the outskirts of paris in totally unsanitary conditions. they need social and health care, not this type of security response. they had already been about. this is the major player insecurity. what's really good success with a wonderful how to solid even sometimes and you can idea and military reporter fulfill the bosses. saw the pandemic as a quote unique opportunity to test propaganda on the population. the plans were implemented, but disturbingly darby chiefs thought they didn't need approval from higher authorities. several officials and military headquarters warned that such policies are not usually deployed against citizens domestically. and had the potential to be

abused by targeting government critics. the campaign called for shaping and exploiting information. c, j o. c claim. the information operation scheme with needed the head of civil disobedience by canadians during the karone of ours pandemic, and to bolster government messages about the pandemic. this project which attempted to shape and exploit information was launched in april of 2020 without the request or even permission of cabinet. and even though then, chief of the defense staff, general john vance, gave verbal orders to shut down the initiative that very same month report show that these influence activities as the military likes to call them, continued for 6 more months until events finally submitted a written edict in november and now you might be wondering how such authoritarian and frankly even mackey value and projects could be allowed to take place in a supposedly liberal country like canada,

is specially since canadian law states that the military is specifically forbidden from using psychological operations or a psy ups within canada unless given explicit permission from the federal government. well, it turns out that the answer there is essentially creative semantics. you see, according to the department of national defense, cy ops are only used abroad and they are, of course, completely and totally different from what it is. instead choosing to refer to as information, operation, campaigns. sure. and as terrible as all this sounds. the sad truth is that this isn't even the 1st time that the canadian military had said it sites upon fellow law abiding canadians. another initiative, this one spearheaded by intelligence officers focused on gathering data from the social media profiles of canadians, is included collecting data on b, l. m. leaders and collecting posts that discussed public opinion of ontario premier

doug ford. all of this is specially when combined with the increasingly strict code protocols put in place by the federal and provincial miss paint's a grim picture for canada's future. it seems increasingly like canadians are finding themselves in a position where their own government and yes, even their own military views them as the enemy and a group to be controlled. next, facebook's head of safety has been grilled by us citizens over the effect. the company's instagram platform has on young people's mental health. it comes off to leaked internal research, which suggested the photo sharing site harms at children's well, big let's go live to us. corresponding now kind of open. i can kind of senators in an angry mood of the hearing. sure, at this point we see facebook once again in the hot seat of the us senate this time because a report showing that a facebook apparently worked to conceal information about the harmful effects on

the mental well being of teenagers caused by instagram. it has weaponized childhood vulnerability against children themselves. it's chosen growth over children's mental health and wellbeing, greed over preventing the suffering of children. this seems to be a recurring theme with this company. do everything and anything to mould the world into your own image, for your own profit without any regard for any harm that is going to be done because your focus is on your pocket book. this book is just like a big tobacco pushing, a product that they know is harmful to the health of young people, pushing it to them early. also, facebook can make money. i g stands for instagram, but it also stands by insta,

greed. now facebook had to postpone the rolling out of their new app directed at children under the age of $1313.00 and younger because of wide spread outrage and the barrage of criticism that facebook was facing after the wall street journal repeal revealed that facebook was well aware of the harmful effects caused by instagram and basically they were aware of these mental health problems caused by instagram, according to their own documents. we make body image issues worse for one in 3 teen girls, teens blame instagram for increases in the rate the finance sightsee and depression . now according to what is being reported among teenagers who are suicidal and contemplating killing themselves, 13 percent in britain and 6 percent in the united states actually listed instagram

as having a been a factor in their desire to commit suicide. now the tech giant has, you know, a basically accused of these reports of, quote, cherry picking facts on the eve of today's hearing. they did release 2 of their own internal reports, but many are looking on with disappointment because this is certainly not the 1st time that facebook has been caught suppressing data and channeling information in their own way. the research that we've seen is that using social apps to connect with other people can have positive mental health benefits. now many people across the political spectrum in the united states, democrats, republicans, it seems like a consensus in the united states that there should be some better regulation of big tack and social media on that. the harmful effects of social media should be controlled. but despite there being such widespread feeling and they're being

ongoing hearings on capital hill, there doesn't seem to be real legislative agenda being rolled out. there don't seem to be real legislation being put into the work to limit the power of big tack and the social media monopolies despite some colorful hearings. like we just heard a big text about the deep pockets for lobbying on capitol hill, hasn't it? ok for now caleb open. thank you. you will see after the break, the lockdown fatigue, the leading to agitated arrest in australia. we assess who could be worsening, the violence, the floaters for the police. thanks. ah the

ah me. jamie diamond was critical. a big claim to starting what it was, $200.00 a point. it's now around $45000.00 point depending as he points out. 10 x from here. so he's looking for up to point $55.00 and about a coin. the news?

ah, hello, we got more than a $130.00 judges in the united states to be criticized for taking part in cases in which day all their families have stood to financially gain. but wall street journal reports for a 131 judges had failed to recuse themselves from 60805 cases since 2010 or involving firms in which they or their family held shares. and in which 2 thirds of the cases ended up being ruled in favor of the judges. relatives held stock worth $15000.00 in companies involved in $173.00 of those cases, and more than $50000.00 worth and $21.00. others of the report also found that in $61.00 instances, the stocks traded during the court proceedings. the us court administrative office says, look into the violations. the wall street journal's report on instances where conflicts inadvertently were not identified before. keats was result or transfer. dest,

troubling, and the administrative office is carefully reviewing the matter. i can say with absolute certainty that i never made any decision in favor of a company, because i own stuck and was invested in that company. i dropped the ball. thank you for help me stay on my toes the way i'm supposed to. i just blew it. i regret any question that i've created the appearance of impropriety or conflict of interest. the newspaper highlights the new york judge who handle the pollution claim against the oil giant exxon mobil while owning excelled stock on colorado. judge whoever sort of case against nbc universal o comcast, in which they to shares the failure of judges to stand aside when there's a financial conflict of interest violates federal law and spoke to furious public reaction. will they go to jail bean teached? if not, then it's just another story of entitlement with no repercussions and prosecutions . we expect judges to be fair and impartial. you now see why americans didn't trust

. there is water and corruption in every level with no consequences. tell me how is that, okay? and nothing will happen, that's the whole problem. look at the senators who benefit from star traits, nothing out to them. different rules, different people. a lawyer in new york politician monte hall also says the situation underlines the reality of american legal and bashi ality. if it would have been one chase, that would have been fine, but instead it was a 131 judges and nearly 700 cases. so this really proves to be, you know, a pervasive and systemic disregard for the choose a law. and it really illustrates how the judges, the federal bench, the whole system as an institution, you know, is impartial and biased. i think this is just the tip of the iceberg. i think all these judges have been exploring this for choose all law for a long,

long time when the public gets a win that the system is corrupt and you know, did the judiciary is not fair and impartial? i think that that really pushes the public to put pressure on our elected officials to come up with structures that demand impartiality anti lockdown rallies are growing around the world, not least in australia, which has ensured the world's longest coping restrictions. and it sparks corresponding growth in the number of cases of alleged police brutality against protested with 2 claims. the last 5 days alone, the potential which emerged on line shows the detention of one demonstrator, apparently just meters from his block, where anti corona virus laws restrict him in

a separate video recorded in sydney. a mother was allegedly arrested by local police front of her children, one not wearing a mask of the. going to talk about this now with the former senior london police officer peter kirk and then also rights activist and alter part of diana. welcome both to the program 1st to you. it seems like one is sparking the other off. peter, i'd imagine that police are trained to anticipate when things like locked down fatigue, overwhelmed people and they start to get out to take it towards offices. presumably the trainings there for them to not responding kind of the background, individual offices and downtown counted up sort of situation where there's this steady development of pressure on the public about particular angle very often. and so it may be useful to mind, is it a just on one basis regardless of that aspect,

offices should be seen proportionately and should not be reacting unkindly. that provoked color. the rules are in place not, not imposed by the police. by the authorities. the police are just doing their job . should the public be taking a commer approach no matter how difficult it must be for them. there is another way to do your job. you know, you can use brutality i'm in and what i saw in the food charge it was quite disturbing that the woman wasn't even doing anything show other resistance. and again, you know, in front of the children, she welcome kit cars in no harm. you know, so destiny. i think the police to change the way they, they do their job. of course it's a pressure job where i'm grateful. but look what is happening now and in long don't you know, we're the depression bond of the lawyer, you know, trust to the police was broken up to the horrible case of the murder of our house.

so people, they need to see a change in the way the police man, you know, do their job. and we want to see that they actually as we trust them, they should, you know, be aware that they have to be good people and not use retaliate. peter, that police response, she said, needs to be proportionate. presumably it does need to be reactive rather than preemptive. and in this particular case that we saw of the video or mentioned earlier, a mother in front of her children is clearly not the same as may be a small gang of young folks. the police primary objectives in the u. k. right back to the beginning and aging trends, the non has been to prevent crime preventative intervention. to stop a problem happening to prevent the crime continuing is not legitimate. might i know the answer force can be used to prevent

a crime and to separate or confronting each other for him to me if necessary. and what needs to happen is the officer's needs to be able to justify the use of force to have a legal reason to using it and to be able to demonstrate before she was necessary in proportionate to the threats as existing existing time. now there's a robust procedure in the u. k, where that happens, offices to account and barbara compliance system by the police, complaints and authorities and by the course shows allegations be made the sources excessive on friday night to expect and please to be able to resolve things without any use. it's also tool and i use it falls isn't necessarily due and becomes so necessary and or excessive, holler, longer pennies. time is taken up, dealing with anti faxes and that protests and people who are fed up with lockdown,

just wanting to say enough, is enough. can any of these evil rallies ever be justified? a man hi, it's a, it's a very difficult time. personally, i think vaccines are precious leisha, reduce the harmonious harbor virus. but i also understand that many people there are really for about the law and shouldn't treat them like or should eventually try to use them on the, on the scene. so i think again, we think there is a need of a balance and jesse, she's treat, you know, the different way. you know, the way the treat me now are killed and you know, member pizza should police forces get different training for these kind of protests because it's, it's not like something that just flared up. this is likely to be going on for months, maybe years as we do with a pandemic,

which isn't going to happen overnight. it's end isn't going to happen overnight, should that be a different tactic in order to deal with these, this a long series of protests and rallied. okay, so are you looking for new tactics, more effective tactics wise, of improving tactics. i use already changes in how the process for taking place, and we've seen that with extinction and in the different tactics. and the police have to use different tactics to address a change form with processes and difficulties and asked for having different trying to different types and protests to say. i think that would lead to more confusion in a single model in terms of the interventions use. and i think he's foss, with stripe around with any variation being addressed in the briefings of offices

as opposed to the training a power. do you think that people who protest against things like wearing face moss and p p a and social distance thing and what have you, a not taking into account that what the police are doing is not necessarily arresting somebody for not having something over their face. they're protecting a sizable proportion of population, a fearful of a deadly disease. absolutely. i know they are doing that. and of course, that we need to have some, you know, some want to help us not spread the virus. but there is another way to do that. and it's not the way that i saw a trade in policeman to, you know, was doing with that for mother. i think that might be something else that we can do . and i agree that you know, different scenarios need different tactics. and i'm sure the people might eventually list some more if you treat them in a different way. if you, if you try to understand, you know what they want to say,

and you also try to explain to them. so eventually, you know, we shouldn't use violence and force like that, but it should make more dial of it in which case. and i'll put this to both of you . but firstly you, paula. it's the government that needs to do the listening, isn't it? not the police, so this is an argument and violence of sled up with what the policy is missing in this definition. the government of course, but the police again is the arm of the government. right? so we can have, you know, an arm that is, is maybe using too much violence against something that is again, it's not, it's not a band of terrorist. so i think that there should be some kind of, you know, different approach. and what would you say, peter, what would that different approach bay in order to try and stop a circle? we regularly get protest is and others criticizing the police. and so i and they

should do it differently. times me a deafening silence. why not? how if you're going to say the police should stop doing things the way they do after years, and then i tried to be able to come up with the listing, tentative and not just i will not my job. and i, yes, final needs like valid suggestions, but don't just say someone doing that. i don't want to suggest what he should be doing. i agree that government should be involved in the, in the change i regime and i work on out there in the least bit few countries around the world in the least the place service. he's not doing them . and each individual constable is an office out of the crown and on the filament, and cannot be directed to use that. tell us if ours, anybody not the commissioner mother, i'm secretary. no problem minister. she'll be here again. come the next protests

for now peter, paula, thanks very much for joining us on katie. thank you. thursday's kaiser reports on the way after which i'll have your next r t news update from moscow. ah ah ah ah ah ah imagine picking up a future textbook on the early years of the 21st century. what other chapters

called gun violence school shootings, homelessness. first, it was my job and it was my name was my savings. i have nothing. i have nothing and it's not like i don't try. i live for resources, i look for jobs, i look for everything i can to make this past. and i end up doing is passing the road to the american dream, paved with dead refugees. very idealized image of the older america, native americans look past the death that happened every single day. this is a modern history of the usa. my america on r t the i max guys are this is the kaiser report. ladies and gentlemen.

we got them, stacy? yes, maxwell, you know, in the last episode we were talking about fashion and the house that fear built is crumbling the house of fear money. that is. and you can tell that in what max finally convinced jamie diamond here big point price could 10 x and the next 5 years says jamie diamond ceo of j. p. morgan chase, of course you, when i have covered him for years here, even before bitcoin, about the shenanigans going on at. if you can call it that shenanigans will say it politely. you know, add j. p. morgan but he was dissing bitcoin in 201-320-1420. 15. 20. 16. 20. 17. 2018. 20. 19. 20. 20. and now in 2021. as you predicted, he capitulated and he's saying,

a big clients going to 10 x in the next 5 years. yep. yeah, yeah. jamie diamond was critical, a big claim. and starting when it was a $200.00 a coin. it's now around $45000.00 coin. it's adding as he points out 10 x from here. so he's looking for up to a point or 52500008 coin. and i've been telling you for years i had this recurring dream about jamie diamond. he would be coming toward me and a deserted match and in the hamptons, and for years he just got closer and closer. and then finally, this week he was in view. he was there on the floor weeping and sobbing, and begging forgiveness. and like a good big corner i forgive jamie and now he's one of us. he's now a bitcoin are and welcome your daughter was here a lot sooner. she's obviously got her mother's brains.