i mentioned retention, we're going underground, broadcasting the stories drowned out by so called mainstream media noise coming up with the show. as 1400000000 people wake up up to china's national day celebrations . will it's nuclear weapons now be targeting not any cities in nuclear, inter nations, but australia to after the biden johnson morrison nuclear submarine deal. and as you, caleb elidah suggest, alma declares his party, the party of nato. we ask the palestinian ambassador to new k. if he has any hope for her majesty's opposition when it comes to fighting for the palestinian people after another week of u. k. u. s. armed violence in palestine refer, fits the day after mainland, china's national day celebrations, which marked 72 years since the establishment of the people's republic of china. up to the chinese communist party, won the civil war against the u. s. backed nationalist party. this made control vesee of revelations of phone calls by u. s. general mili to re ensure china of new eminent u. s. nuclear strike. and the surprise australia nuclear submarine deal with london in washington. joining me now from aging is the center of china and globalization,

vice president, victor gao. victor, thanks so much for coming back. that own, as i said, is the day after you have a britain's, a queen, elizabeth, the aircraft carrier coming towards your maritime borders. nato countries openly threatening your existence, ro, us as ronald reagan nurse strike, carry a force sailing towards you. bad times for china, welsh, i'm the just celebrated the 72nd national day hole and 3 hours in all of our great celebration. i was very happy, very united on the government. yes, of course. there have been lots of incursions or impulses that carry on the ocean all kinds and possibly so our eats into china and other waters around china. this is a very serious matter, and china condemns such incursions and they are not purely freedom of navigation

exercises. they are using freedom of navigation as an excuse to challenge channel sovereignty and territorial integrity. and in such a way, china not only contends date, will prepare the consequences for such violations of channels. national interest. i mean, though, we were going watch our video about the economist magazine on our youtube channel in widely quoted remarks around the world image in corresponding was saying, she jim being will try and unify china before he leaves office. what he may give, he is very popular among the chinese people. he probably will be very long, so be in positions, not the unification of china. that is channels. mainland, with china's taiwan properties, is a mega trends allow time, it will happen sooner or later. it will happen peacefully if we can,

and not peacefully if it has to be. so we need to prepare for that day when the re unification will happen. and i personally believe no force whatever from whichever part of the world will be able to stand in the way of chinese people's reunification. now, you know, repeated her expert opinion over the decade saying china's economy was about to blow up its poor growth. all the rest of it. we have headlines in nature, nation media saying you have massive power goods. you learn human rights abuses, engine. jang, whoa. i mean is the power on in beijing? it looks like where you have the lights on there. apparently cold stocks for only 15 days left for the 6 biggest power generation companies. 11.3000000 tons of the 21st of september. well, talking about the power shortage in china. i would say to a very large, it was in the inflated by china itself. why,

because china now has declared to the world and has informed the chinese nation by 30 by 2030 china need to. ready have the p t of the c o 2 emission by and the 60 h l a need to achieve neutrality of c o 2 emission. as a result of that, the chinese government is really putting a lot of pressure to cold, sterile coal bass, power stations. and that actually was a big reason why there has been recently a big shortage of power in some places, abrupt of, of power supply without informing the people in a timely manner should be corrected out, say, and then the government and power suppliers need to figure out a way to make sure that while china is absolutely doing the right thing to how the

c o 2 emission, by closing down some other kobe's, the power plants, how china can manage to provide enough power from other sources to the end users. that's a challenge that china need to going forward. the un says it's not gonna happen in time when they've even into any to anyone. you're having problems. the fossil fuel emissions are not going to go down. obviously, china, the biggest, obviously, you know, per capita with the biggest emitter in absolute terms. well, if you look at china's tracker, all the over the past 10 years, also the cap, the unit c o 2 emission for the chinese manufacturer inside the industrial side has been cut down. there is significant, significantly now or china, which is still enjoying very rapid economic development. this goal has its own pay, but i think different sectors and the whole population in china are ready to go

through this very painful period to achieve government decay on the target on one hand. and also to make sure that the economy in general need to proceed in a normal way rather than suffering significant disruption. please keep in mind that china has enough power generation as it is. the real problem is, what materials do use if you continue to use a lot of coal as the primary source of power, then the government is very much determined against it. if you use other sources of power, for example, natural gas or crude oil or increasing the renewal source is sola we, it's address, then the chinese government is very much encouraging that well, hopefully overly more of the solar and wind and renewables rather than the oil. and gas, no one's measuring the fossil fuel emissions of all these warships from nato,

the u. s. and u. k headed your way. what did you make of these revelations in washington? general milly, the joint chiefs, us, joint chiefs chairman saying that he had to reassure chinese counterpart that there was not going to be a 1st nuclear strike on china. first of all, i think generally is highly regarded. i respect it from the chinese site. now what is happening in washington, the congressional hearing and a testimony congressional hearing is a confirmation of one point. that is a very important that is there will be no wall between china and the united states . and that is in the, as the interest of mankind. there are people who are very eager and agitated to provoke a war between china, the united states, and they are not doing that in the interest of the american people. some people in

the united states even claim that china and united states needs to have a wall with each other. they are legal. i understand the consequence of a war g channel, the united states. because if it is a matter carefully to what henry kissinger has to say recently, he's basically saying, any war breaking out t challenge the novice states may soon escalate into. i'm again, my hand is found anything, henry kissinger, anything it just says with the global cell is usually usually a reverse barometer. arguably. i think you know what happened in vietnam, cambodia in and lau. you have said i noticed previously that australia will lose its privilege of not being targeted by chinese nuclear weapons. thanks to this surprise, august deal between washington london and camera. is that gonna happen? should there be nuclear missile upgrades to the nuclear submarines? now being talking about coming from britain in the united states. well, 1st of all,

this august is very much against the world because world today needs peace and stability. i possess you nuclear weapons, nuclear submarines and they are kind of fine to me. it's a claim that is nuclear power summary, it is not agonized summary, but i would argue the difference on the hess richie is really very much artificial, because a submarine is a weapon. and if it is powered by nuclear power, that nuclear power summary can strike or can be attacked in time of war and attacking a nuclear power summary. and we'll turn that summary in itself into a big explosion. and that's definitely will constitute a big nuclear weapon to start with. therefore, i would say, by possessing nuclear submarine either nuclear power summary,

or nuclear weaponized or submarine australia will no longer qualify. as a member of the nuclear re south was a big song. so i would say the australian government is not informing the australian people can do 3000000 them sufficiently about what will be the consequence of office. because i believe the australian people do not want to lose that privilege and coverage. it status of being a nuclear free country, living in that big of a bubble, or south as a big nuclear re song. because by losing that status, australia will be targeted with nuclear weapons. well, as i said out of scot morrison, they're striving needs saying they're definitely not nuclear weapons, but to just find the, i mean, china has seemingly been supporting the federal reserve making bitcoin illegal. it's losing a propaganda war, arguably in the west,

completely as we get more and more articles and so called liberal papers talking about the need to confront china. and kamala harris with joe biden's, vice president said, aging continues to cause cause to intimidate and to make claims to the law. the vast majority of the south china sea, you think the communist by the will remain calm. as the rhetoric is heated up more and more in coming weeks, listen, the americans should know better than many other countries because ink 1945 when japan unconditionally surrendered. japan surrendered all the islands aisle reefs in the south pacific sea to the republic of china. because on that, on china, in the form of the republic of china, the united states and the former soviet union and group, and to a lesser extent, france, we were the victor nations, after defeating nazi germany in europe and imperialistic to japan in the east and

japan surrendered everything to charlotte in 1945, china in 1945 was the only independent country standing on its feet after winning the war against japan. so the united states knew this, but better them in. and just as a matter of fact, the united states dispatched it's only or forces to help the republic of china naval forces to reclaim all these islands and briefs in the south channel, see from the surrounding japanese soldiers. therefore, we do not need to look beyond 1945. we just need to stop at 1945 and check all the historical records. and china has undisputable crane to laws, islands, and reeves, et cetera. and where you accuse china of violating other countries

claims, where do they trace their cray back to 1945. we need to call a spade a spade. thank you. go. thank you. thank you very much. after the break, after another week of u. s. u. k armed violence in palestine, we speak to the palestinian ambassador to the u. k. about a new ultimatum for israel. all the small can we help about 2 of going underground with ah, if you are expecting be of longer meant to be in the image with a seat. and i'm sorry, this is a wrong expectation. be you will have to see is that you want me to go with julie entities. you can't impose the democratic system on both of you all and the political order.

ah welcome back. at the same you. ok, labor party conference were anti jeremy corbin, leader to guest armor declared his body to be the party of nato emotionless past calling for israel to meet because of the ongoing knock by on palestine. the motion that passed without much publicity called for an ethical trade policy and an n d u k arm sales to his rail progress after another week of violence in palestine and with the palestinian ambassador britain who sons omelet ambassador, thanks so much for coming to the studio, i mean we've had killings all week in palestine, kings of children, by british armed israeli soldiers and had said last year was the worst with the palestinian authority before we get on the british issues. i mean, how bad is it there we go with and the occupation about very rugged, i mean,

of course are covered the has at palestine, the pulse in economy as it did all over the world. but the particular, if your wall situation is the occupation has really made things much, much worse, according to the same you are an organization on the policy and economy loses $2500000000.00 every year because of the israeli occupation policies, particularly the theft of our resources the control of all natural resources, land water, and what have you and the crippling occlusions and processes that does not allow the palestinian economy to utilize its full potential. that the seizure goes over the last 416 years. in fact, the u on has estimated that all lease since 2001 to 2070 in the policy and economy loss. $50000000000.00 because of israeli measures hostile adverse measures. that's more than please 3 times the size of the entire policy in economy. and if you look

deeper, you will see that the people focus more on the military aggressions of the occupation . there's a real compression, but there is economic wafa that has been happening for decades since then. the, the economic warfare has many tools that are not allowing us to trade. you know, the export on import are completely controlled by as well. not allowing us to have our own currency as, as in central bank, not allowing us to have any serious fiscal policies in addition to the movement of people. and would you say this to say this a james cleverly morris johnson's office minutes? what is it? what did he say is britain arms? israeli army that is killing your people? this is, this is, this is a very major discussion. a main point under discussion that, you know, we are not seeking aid here. we are really seeking trade and we are seeking to utilize our own resources that are being stolen on a daily basis in every sense,

you know, of the didn't see of the west bank the occupied west back is very rich in mineral materials and resources and steves on a daily basis, it's a multi $1000000000.00 in the us that it's also the worst. of course, we'll discuss the issue of the illegal trade with these settlements on resources that the u. k. must ban the importation of these programs. of course we discuss resume, he said no to that whilst proposing the settlement. they always acknowledge the legality of settlement. they say that with all the encourage our businesses to do any transactions in the occupied territories, but there is no enforcement. and this is what we insist on short of enforcement and consequences. the verbal commitment to international law means that elected and we've been added for now 70 years. and this one does not even hear the statements. well, great news though, at the labor party conference, when from the floor, ordinary members said no more on sales,

no more sales from occupied territories. that there is an ongoing neck where the apartheid is there. what did you make of a lease? and then the, and the a leadership distancing themselves from the vote on the floor. you were there at the conference. yes, i was very disappointing. actually, an unfortunate because that was a democratic vote. the resolution, the motion passed overwhelmingly, which shows the depth of support of the labor base to the issue of palestine to the cause of palestine and to international law. and then if you go back to the motion, you will read that it is primarily about enforcement of international law, about attaching consequences to the motion or it was very clear, a it for a finally, this is the 1st time such a language comes out that ok we recognize that certain massage legal, but we want to do something about that and therefore we must seize any trade with illegal entities that exporting arms to israel must be in line with british law

and international law on israel is evidently in violation of all these laws. but more than that, it's also the narrative that they pack the framework for years. we have been talking about peace process and underline process. so for 30 years since 199130 years. exactly. we have been stuck with the all international partners, including that it will often by the way, about this discourse of because it's beyond anything under the jeremy corbin level . but these process speech process speech process. whenever we tell them that we are accepting the piece process that the last you should go back to the negotiating table. what is the new about this, this new motion? it redefines the situation and it's real. it's real narrative that this is a colonial part, that this is why that is no clearly defined as an apartheid regime controlling largely on civilians and the for the palestinian people have the right to protection and to resist. i mean, you say apartheid that, you know, that's a guess,

thomas foreign secretary, chad, orange act release. and then the said just to condemn israeli atrocities. and we know that scores of women and children were killed in main. garza is to be anti semitic. what did, what did you say kissed? i'm a say to you, did you have a good chat with him? yes, i met him and we have, we have a very good job in the, in searcy summer is a human rights lawyer. he knows exactly international law. he knows the values of labor, the values of the, of the u. k. and therefore, you know, there is, it's obvious that is a gap between the leadership and the base. and hopefully that will be bridge because then, but we know he's bankrolled by israeli lobby. is that correct? you didn't raise the fact that he's from the leadership campaign was financed by someone who supports israel. the key matter here is how to present that of the leadership of its own base and how to present that of the leadership of the values

of labor. these values are the values of social justice, of equality, of international. those are the ones words all the time. you only there at the un general assembly. did you mean what did he mean when he said, i give israel a year to get out and abide by un security council resolution to we will recognize israel. something about the international court of justice. you'll go to the international court of justice in a year's time. why don't going out why given israel another year? and there isn't a national community. there's a national community has invested heavily in the project. remember, it was the solution that international, and israel has feel that international equilibrium that international division legitimacy. and today he's our president and our people are throwing back the ball into the international in a year's time. early israel be much worried about that. the israel denies it as well. and boris jones, when you mentioned the i c, c, investigation, boys, johnson is clear and says that is an attack on israel. the i c. c,

the independence of the i. c. c is very important and i don't think politicians should intervene. what judges, this court was established exactly for issues like ours. so war crimes are prosecute the war crimes or criminals are held accountable. so if the prime minister is johnson has an issue with this, i think he may have issues with international legality. i mean, it's not just about johnson, joe biden. the united states also says the i c. c has no jurisdiction. it's very unfortunate and extremely unfortunately somebody, those of the so called free world the for the very same countries that established these laws. and these conventions, and these courts would doubt it's legitimacy and its independence. and its relevance is, is extremely unfortunate. and i believe this is, this goes beyond power stuff. this is about this kind of wall. we want to 11 and the kind of world we want to leave for our children and grandchildren. and i think it has caused a lot of damage because of the special relationship to our global system. you

mentioned leadership there. i mean, is there ever going to be an election in your country? i mean, when we were bus ended is german 20 or no. we are one of the, if you in the region, my friend who convenes a kind of elections. we are one of the few who really base our legitimacy on the democratic new york stuff happened. unfortunately, it was absolutely key in on creating all the divisions of leaving garza low, the so called will roll it 2005, creating the vacuum. regrettably since then, we were not able to convene a proper a comprehensive national elections. but we agreed all political parties into the fact that has to convene national elections as you remember earlier this year. and then we had the obstacle of israel, v to again. yeah, i mean, you know, you know, what are some people in the last, somebody will know even in the last. and you might have seen the un security

council talking about palestine the other day. they said that your father, how people are cooperating with israel in coordinating assassinations, they talk about needs are by not abducted on the 24th of june, 42 injuries inflicted with metal pipes. well, what is going on here is, is you are, is my, with a bus in, with israel against the palestinian people. i don't accept this question or shot because you need to hear those are the prime minister only a few days ago in washington. and in the new york, when he said he will never, ever meet president a bus because a bus is deploying a guest district. and he is, you know, this kind of talk does not look, did you guys kill him? mistakes happened. the incident was very unfortunate for palestinian already to talk responsibility. there was investigation. the 14 soldiers of you know, police policeman, rest of them were actually invited and prosecuted. and there is

a court going on. there are president met all the heads of the human rights organizations in palestine only a few days ago actually couple of weeks ago. precise. and they are not old enough to make sure that our basic law, our constitution, if i may use of our respect to human rights, is going to be implemented between the civil society and the leadership. so that was a mistake and you get a bill and a good, but that does not deviate from the major fact that everybody goes and 5 and palestinian. there is a lot of efforts by the israeli lobby, the machine to describe the situation as into understand the internal even rush is always said that rushes over the you in general, are you in the nationalist at the security council? said the problem here to an extent, obviously there are lots of problems. there are violations of un security council resolutions is not unified. why is it, there's not a joint press conference with the boss and the am us authority and guys are

altogether showing unity to unify them. this is absolutely a requirement and the prerequisite egypt is mediating between all the office as we speak. we met in istanbul, and in cairo we agreed on all the details. i tell you the, the, the heart of the matter, the root cause of all this is an occupation that is in control of everything. when we were very close to elections and then you will all democratic process establishing a nation, you know, to go a month, they pull the curve of jocilan, they're denying us the right to convene election. although in fact, it's joe biden is saying, he's saying he's opposed enough to have a ben. it's idea of not allowing us to mission in ramallah. he didn't do anything about that. i myself as a part of the numbers that here went to the british government. we went everywhere calling for them. our foreign minister came to london just days before postponing the lectures and pleading with the government with question owners and to allow us elections. and he's also faust. if you listen, it is the occupied camera kind of fun. it's time, it's the compass of the palestinian people. you see every time you will sit in the

statute and thought people are focused on united defense to them. so that is no way we could actually allow for all of them craft process to go ahead without our campus without our heart. and without the, if i can, with the fullest, especially like what tom has done a couple of years ago, you know, recognizing the car yourself as well. so we couldn't, and therefore it is important that you are asking these questions to pinpoint that of course elections are important. but we are doing elections and we are doing palestinian institutions for an all national objective, which is independence, which is a return our rights, the end is johnson, and the end is our, our state and our rights assigned to make us in a continue in an endless process and in that process chip, just take away your loss of them. now this and this election will not allow you to compute elections and in your occupied capital. and by the way, jerusalem is not a city that weekly jocelyn was a city we own a more than 30250000 pounds that he has on every church, every most, every shop,

every house in jerusalem. and then next they will tell you ok elections without janine elections without what kind of accept this or it is crucial to continue with our friends with all this, the national support you've seen what happened in may the inspiration in the streets of london and the streets of washington and chicago, new york. oh, thank you very much. that's over the show will be back on monday when you get a chance. look for the goldman sachs employee, which is so that makes the speech of the conservative body conference after announcing arising, national insurance and welfare. got to me, they coven hit economy until then. you can keep in touch by rule as social media. let us know what you think of you can sales to israel. ah, with

these are the 4 people who pulled the trigger or 5 something and survival. when hardest things that i had to face was not tommy, a face at a low expectation of life. i sent a death in accept the fact that i made. that's where we had no fears. del change pretty fast for shots. different stories behind the bullets who are all those driven by drink shaped bankers are those with who dares sinks. we dare to ask

a you can authorities color the army to alleviate pressure. the petro pumps as people panic by fuel. still the public blaming the media for the crisis, according to the latest polls, although some are also question of government to the news is many late in the media to government media government to play. meantime, gas prices in europe hit a new hi with the german government, wanting people to repair for chile month ahead. at the same time as the countries energy regulated is still yet to ground, to license for russia's brand new nord streamed to gas pipeline. or the

paramount challenge shaken by offices. i've spoke.