biden johnson morrison nuclear submarine deal and is u. k. labor leaders against armor declares his party, the party of nato. we ask the palestinian ambassador to new k if he has any hope for majesty's opposition when it comes to fighting for the palestinian people after another week. of u. k. u. s. armed violence in palestine. the 1st is the day after mainland, china's national day celebrations, which mark 72 years and see a stablish mint of the people's republic of china after the chinese communist party won the civil war against the u. s. backed nationalist party, this i'm in control vesee of revelations of phone calls my us general milli, to re insure china new, eminent us nuclear strike. and a surprise, australia nuclear submarine deal with london in washington. joining me now from aging is the center of china and globalization, vice president, victor gao. victor, thanks so much for coming back on. as i said, is the day after you have britain's a queen lives with the aircraft carrier coming towards your maritime borders. nato countries openly threatening your existence, ro, us as ronald reagan strike, carry

a force sailing towards you. bad times for china, welsh, i'm that just celebrated the 72nd national day hole and 3 hours in a mood of our great celebration. i was very happy or united the government. yes, of course. there have been lots of incursions or impulses that carry and the ocean all kinds and possibly so our eats into china and other waters around china. this is a very serious matter and china condemns such incursions. and they are not purely freedom of navigation as the sizes they are using. freedom of navigation as an excuse to challenge channel sovereignty and territorial integrity. and in such a way, china not only contends date, will the consequences for such violations of china's national interest. i mean,

now we will come watch our video about the economist magazine on our youtube channel in widely quoted remarks around the world image in correspondence saying, she jim being will try and unify china before he leaves office. what he may give, he is very popular among the chinese people. he probably will be very long, so be in positions, not the unification of china. that is china's mainland, with china. taiwan properties is a mega trends about time. it will happen sooner or later. it will happen peacefully if we can, and not peacefully if it has to be. so we need to prepare for that day when the reunification will happen. and i personally believe no force whatever from whichever part of the world will be able to stand in no way of chinese people's

reunification. now, you know, repeated an expert opinion over the decade saying china's economy was about to blow up its poor growth. all the rest of it. we have headlines in nature, nation media saying you have massive power goods. you learn human rights abuses, engine. jang. well, i mean is the power on in beijing? it looks like that. you have the lights on there. apparently cold stocks for only 15 days left for the 6 biggest power generation companies. but 11300000 tons of the 21st to september. when i'm talking about the power shortage in china, i would say to a very large extent that was inflated by china itself. why? because china now has declared to the world and has informed the chinese nation by 30, by 2030 china need to have the p t all the c o 2 emission,

and the 60 celine to achieve neutrality of c o 2 emission. as a result of that, the chinese government is really putting a lot of pressure to coal style, coal bass power stations. and that actually was a big reason why there has been recently a big shortage of power in some places, abrupt county of power supply without informing the people in a timely manner should be corrected, i would say. and then the government and power suppliers need to figure out a way to make sure that while town is absolutely doing the right thing to allow the c o 2 emission by closing down some other kobe's, the power plants, how china can manage to provide enough power from other sources to the end users, that's a challenge that china need to are going forward. the un says it's not gonna happen

in time and have even in 2021 you're having problems. the fossil fuel emissions are not going to go down the china, the biggest obviously, you know, per capita with the biggest emitter in absolute terms. well, if you look at china's tracker, all the over the past 10 years, also the cap, the unit c o 2 emission for the chinese manufacturer inside the industrial side has been cut down very significant significantly now or china, which is still enjoying very rapid economic development. this goal has its own pay, but i think different sectors and the whole population in china are ready to go through this very painful period to achieve the government. the higher the target on one hand, and also to make sure that the economy in general need to proceed in a normal way rather than suffering significant disruption. please keep in mind that

china has enough power generation as it is. the real problem is, what materials do use if you continue to use a lot of coal as the primary source of power, then the government is very much determined against it. if you use other sources of power, for example, natural gas or crude oil or increasing the renewal source is sola we, it's address, then the chinese government is very much encouraging that well, hopefully overly more of the solar and wind and renewables rather than the oil. and gas, no one's measuring the fossil fuel emissions of all these warships from nato, the u. s. and u. k headed your way. what did you make of these revelations in washington general milli, the joint chiefs, us, joint chiefs chairman saying that he had to reassure chinese counter guard that there was not going to be a 1st nuclear strike on china. first of all,

i think generally is highly regarded. i respect it from the chinese side. know what is happening in washington the congressional hearing and really is testimony. congressional hearing is a confirmation of one point that is very important. that is, there will be no wall between china and the united states, and that is in the interest of mankind. there are people who are very eager and agitated to provoke a war between china, the united states. and they are not doing that in the interest of the american people. some people in the united states even claim that china and united states needs to have a wall with each other. they are little understand the consequence of a war g channel, the united states. because if there is a very carefully to what to henry kissinger has to say recently,

he's basically saying, any war breaking out t channel, i mean, i was, states may soon escalate into. i'm again, my hand is found anything, henry kissinger, anything it just says where the global cell is usually, usually a reverse barometer. arguably. i think you know what happened in vietnam, cambodia in and lau have said i noticed previously that australia will lose its privilege of not being targeted by chinese nuclear weapons. thanks to this surprise, august deal between washington london and cambra. is that gonna happen? should there be nuclear missile upgrades to the nuclear submarines now being talking about coming from britain in the united states? well, 1st of all, this august is very much against the world because world today needs peace and stability. i possess you nuclear weapons, nuclear submarines, and they are kind of fine to me. it's

a claim that is nuclear power summary. it is not agonized summary, but i would argue the difference on the hess richie is really very much artificial because a submarine is a weapon. and if it is powered by nuclear power, that nuclear power summary can strike or can be attacked in time of war and attacking a nuclear power summary. and we'll turn that summary in itself into a big explosion. and that's definitely will constitute a big nuclear weapon to start with. therefore, i would say, by possessing nuclear submarine either nuclear power summary, or nuclear weaponized or submarine australia will no longer qualify. as a member of the nuclear re south was a big song. so i would say the australian government is not informing the australian people can do 3000000 them sufficiently about what will be the

consequence of office. because i believe the australian people do not want to lose that privilege and coveted status of being a nuclear free country. leading in that big people or south has a big nuclear re song because by losing that status, australia will be targeted with nuclear weapons. well, as i said, those got morrison. they'll straighten the the thing and if we know from nuclear weapons, but to just find the, i mean china has seemingly been supporting the federal reserve making bitcoin illegal. it's losing a propaganda war, arguably in the west completely as we get more and more articles. and so called liberal papers talking about the need to confront china and kamala harris for jo biden's, vice president said beijing continues to cause cause to intimidate and to make claims to the law. the vast majority of the south china sea,

you think the communist by the will remain calm. as the rhetoric is heated up more and more in coming weeks. listen, the americans should know better than many other countries because ink 1945 when japan unconditionally surrendered. japan surrendered all the islands aisle reefs in the south pacific sea to the republic of china. because at that time, china in the form of the republic of china, the united states and the former soviet union and group. and to a lesser extent, france, we were the victor nations, after defeating nazi germany in europe and imperialistic which east and japan surrendered. everything to charlotte in 1945, china in 1945 was the only independent country standing on its feet after winning the war against japan. so the united states knew this part better

than any other. and just as a matter of fact, the united states dispatched it's only or forces to help the republic of china naval forces to reclaim all these islands and reefs in the south channel see from the surrounding japanese soldiers. therefore, we do not need to look at the young man to 45. we just need to stop at 1945 and check all the historical records. and china has undisputable crane to laws, islands, and reeves, et cetera. and where you accuse china of violating other countries claims, where do they trace their claim back to 1945. we need to call a spade a spade. thank you. go. thank you. thank you very much. after the break, after another week of u. s. u. k armed violence in palestine, we speak to the palestinian, the message of the u. k. about

a new ultimatum for israel. all the small can we help about 2 of going undergrad? ah, the world is driven by dreamers shaped banks. 10 percent of those with there's things we dare to ask for. what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy. even foundation, let it be an arms race group is on often very dramatic development. only personally

and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical time to sit down and talk with ah, welcome back. at the same you. ok, labor party conference were anti jeremy corbin, leader to guest armor declared his party to be the party of nato. a motion was passed calling for israel to meet because of the ongoing knock by in palestine. the motion that passed without much publicity called for an ethical trade policy and an n d u k. arm sales to israel. progress after another week of violence in palestine . and with the policy and ambassador britain who sons omelet ambassador, thanks so much for coming to the studio. i mean, we've had killings all week in palestine,

kings of children by british armed israeli soldiers that had said last year was the worst with the palestinian authority before we get on the british issues. i mean, how bad is it there we go with and the occupation right now for the very word. i mean, of course, covered the has hit palestine, the policy and economy as it did all over the world. but the particular review of all situation, that is the occupation has really made things much, much worse, according to the same you an organization on the policy and economy loses $2500000000.00 every year because of the israeli occupation policies, particularly the theft of our resources, the control of our natural resources, land, water, and what have you and the crippling occlusions and processes that does not allow the study an economy to utilize its full potential. that the seizure goes over the

last 416 years. in fact, the, the u and has estimated that all lease since 2001 to 2070 in the policy and economy loss. $50000000000.00 because of israel measures hostile adverse measures. that's more of an increase 3 times the size of the entire policy than in economy. and if you look deeper, you will see that the people focus more on the military aggressions of the occupation israeli occupation. but that is economic well for this has been happening for decades since then. the economic warfare has many tools, not allowing us to trade. you know, the export on import are completely controlled by is we're not allowing us to have our own currency as, as in central bank. not allowing us to have any serious fiscal policies in addition to the movement of people. and would you say this to say this is james, cleverly bar as johnson's foreign office ministers? what did, what did he say is britain arms,

israeli army that is killing your people? this is, this is, this is a very major discussion. a main point under discussion that, you know, we are not seeking aid here. we are really seeking trade and we are seeking to utilize our own resources that are being stolen on a daily basis. in every sense, you know, of the didn't see of the west bank the occupied was back, is very rich in mineral materials and resources and steves on a daily basis. it's a multi $1000000000.00 investor that exposed to the us. of course, we discussed the issue of the legal trade with these settlements on resources that the u. k. must ban the importation of these programs. of course we discuss resume. he said no to that whilst opposing the settlement. they always acknowledge the legality of settlement. they say that with all the encourage our businesses to do any transactions and they're occupied directories, but there is no enforcement. and this is what we insist on short of enforcement and consequences. the verbal commitments to international law means very lesson. and

we've been at that for now 70 years, and this was not even here the statements. well, great news though, at the labor party conference, when from the floor, ordinary members said no more on sales, no more sales from occupied territories. that there is an ongoing neck where the apartheid is there. what did you make of a lease? and andy and the suitcase drama leadership distancing sales from the vote on the floor. you were there at the conference? yes, i was very disappointing. actually unfortunate because that was a democratic vote. the resolution, the motion passed overwhelmingly, which shows the depth of support of the labor base to the issue of palestine to the cause of palestine and with the national law. and then if you go back to the motion, you will read that it is primarily about enforcement of international law, about attaching consequences to legalities that the motion was very clear. a,

it for a finally, this is the 1st time such a language comes out that ok, we recognize the southernmost illegal, but we want to do something about that. and therefore we must seize any trade with illegal entities. that the exporting arms who is a must be in line with british law and international law. and israel is evidently in violation of all these laws. but more than that, it's also the narrative that they pad i the framework for years we have been talking about peace process and underline process. so for 30 years since 199130 years. exactly. we have been stuck with the all international partners, including the name of often by the way, about this discourse of because it's beyond anything under the jeremy corbin level . but these process speech process, speech process. and whenever we tell them that we are accepting the piece process that the last you should go back to the negotiating thing. what is the new about this? this new motion 3 defines the situation and it's real. it's real narrative that

this is a colonial part, that this is why that is no clearly defined as an apartheid regime controlling largely on civilians and the for the palestinian people have the right to protection and to resist. i mean, you say apartheid that, you know, that's a guess thomas warren, secretary of orange act release and then the said, just to condemn israeli atrocities. and we know that scores of women and children were killed in main. garza is to be anti semitic. what did, what did so kiss darma say to you, did you have a good chat with him? yes, i met him and we have, we have very good just in case our is the human rights lawyer. he knows exactly international law. he knows the values of labor, the values of the, of the u. k. and therefore, you know, there is, it's obvious, there is a gap between the leadership and the base. and hopefully that will be bridge

because then we know he's bankrolled by israeli lobby. is that correct? you didn't raise the fact that he's from the leadership campaign was financed by someone who supports israel. the key matter here is how to present that of the leadership of its own base and how to present that of the leadership of the values of labor. these values are the values of social justice, of equality, of internationally. those are the buzz words all the time. you only there at the un general assembly. did you mean what did he mean when he said, i give israel a year to get out and abide by un security council resolution to we will recognize israel, something about the international court of justice. you'll go to the international court of justice in a year's time. why don't going out why given israel another year? and there isn't a national community, it's a national community has invested heavily in the project member. it was the solution that international requirement is well, has failed that international equilibrium that international division legitimacy.

and today he's our president and our people are throwing back the ball into the international in a year's time. early israel be much worried about that. the israel denies it as well as john to when you mentioned the i c c. investigation. boy johnson is clear and says that is an attack on israel. the i, c, c, the independence of the i. c. c is very important and i don't think politicians should intervene. what judges, this court was established exactly for issues like ours. so war crimes are prosecute to the war. crimes or criminals are held accountable. so if the prime minister is johnson has an issue with this, i think he may have issues with international legality. i mean, it's not just about johnson, joe biden. the united states also says the i c. c has no jurisdiction. it's very unfortunate and extremely unfortunately. so many, those of the so called free world, the for the very same countries that established these laws and these conventions, and these courts would doubt it's legitimacy and its independence. and its

relevance is, is extremely unfortunate. and i believe this is, this goes beyond power stuff. this is about this kind of wall. we want to 11 and the kind of world we want to leave for our children and grandchildren. and i think it has caused a lot of damage because of the special relationship to our global system. you mentioned leadership there. i mean, is there ever going to be an election in your country? i mean, when we, the bus ended is german 20 or not? we are one of the, if you in the region, my friend who convenes untrue and kind of actions. we are one of the few who really base our legitimacy on the democratic. newer stuff happened. unfortunately, it was absolutely key in on creating all the divisions of even garza, the so called with the 2005, creating the vacuum. regrettably since then, we were not able to convene a proper a comprehensive national elections. but we agreed all political parties into the

fact that has to convene national elections as you remember earlier this year. and then we had the obstacle of israel, v to again. yeah, i mean, you know, you know, what are some people in the last, somebody will know even in the last. and you might have seen the un security council talking about ballast. and the other day, they said that your fighter people are cooperating with israel in coordinating assassination. they talk about needs or by not abducted only 20 votes of june, 42 injuries inflicted with metal pipes. well, what is going on here is, is you are, is my, with a bus in, with israel against the palestinian people. i don't accept this question or shot because you need to hear those are a prime minister only a few days ago in washington and in the new york. when he said he will never, ever meet president of us because of the, our best is deploying a guest district and he is, you know, this kind of does not well,

did you guys kill him? mistakes happened. the incident was very unfortunate. the palestinian authority to talk responsibility. there was investigation. the 14 soldiers of you know, police policeman, rest of them were actually invited and prosecuted. and there is a court going on. there are president mit all the heads of the human rights organizations in palestine. only a few days ago, actually couple of weeks ago, precise. and they are not old enough to make sure that our basic law, our constitution, i may use our respect to human rights is going to be implemented between the civil society and the leadership. so that was a mistake and you get a bill and a good, but that does not deviate from the major fact that everybody goes of pills. 5 and palestinian. there is a lot of efforts by the israeli lobby, the machine to describe the situation as into understand the an internal even rush

is always said that rushes over the you in general are you in national at the security council said the problem here to an extent obviously there are lots of problems. there are violations of un security council resolutions is not unified. why is it, there's not a joint press conference with the boss and the am us authority in guys altogether showing unity to unify them. this is absolutely a requirement and a prerequisite egypt is mediating between all the office as we speak. we met in istanbul, and in cairo we agreed on all the details. i tell you the, the, the heart of the matter, the root cause of all this is an occupation that is in control of everything. when we were very close to elections and then you will, all of them are cracking process establishing a nation, you know, to go a month. they pull the code of, of jocilan. they're denying us the right to convene election. although in fans, joe biden is saying he's saying he's opposed enough to have a ben. it's idea of not allowing us to mission in ramallah. he didn't do anything about that. i myself as a protestant on both of them here,

went to the british government. we went everywhere calling for them. our foreign minister came to london just days before postponing the lectures at pleading with the government. a book question owners went to allow us elections and is your son boss? is you listen, it is the occupied camera kind of fun. it's time, it's the compass of the palestinian people. you see every time you listen to the statute and thought people are focused on united to defend most of them. so there is no way we could actually allow for all of them across the process to go ahead without our campus without our hawk. and without the, if i scan with the file, especially like what tom has done a couple of years ago, you know, recognizing that you're with us or we couldn't. and therefore, it is important that you are asking these questions to pinpoint that of course elections are important. but we are doing elections and we are doing palestinian institutions for an over or national objective, which is independence, which is on our rights. the end is johnson, and then is our, our state and our rights, and to make us in

a continue in an endless process. and in that process, chip chip, take away your loss of them. now this and this election will not allow you to compete elections in your occupied capital. and by the way, jerusalem is not a city that weekly jocelyn was a city we own more than 350000. but the study is on every church. every most, every shop, every house in jerusalem and then next they will tell you ok exceptions without janine elections without what kind of accept this. so it is crucial to continue with our friends with all this notion of support. you've seen what happened to me, the inspiration of the streets of london and the streets of washington and chicago, new york. thank you very much. that's for the show will be back on monday when you get a chance or for the goldman sachs employee, which is so that makes this meeting the conservative body conference after announcing arising, national insurance and welfare got to me, they cove, it hits economy until then. you can keep in touch by rule not social media. let us know what you think of. you can sales to israel

ah, of course, after 40 years of fed interventionism by simply expanding and pretending and printing a lot of money. they got into this cargo called, you call it mentality where simply waving a flag, you know, it's actually printing more money is going to make all the problems disappear. meanwhile, politically, what we've seen in america is really remarkably the liberal left in their co hearts in the media. even now that this policy is cause incredible human suffering in america, they effectively marginalize those people, as quote, deplorable and really made scapegoats of the victims of japan. they've often said that this is a victimless crime, money printing and extortion that's practice at the fed. and yet i look at those 90000 dead americans last year from opiate overdose. i'd say how you got blood on your hands because that's a direct result of mal investment, money printing, and rogue economics that you're practicing as a charlatan. a

from tanks to tank has britain colds in the army to alleviate pressure at the petro pumps, as people panic by fuel. also, the public blames the media for stoking hysteria, although many of pointing to the government. the news is the media. family media government widely, europe's gas prices have hit a new hi with the german government, wanting people to prepare for a chilly month ahead at the same time as the countries energy regulator. it's still yet to granted license for brushes, no stream to gas pipeline. paramount challenge.