miss obscene ah, these people up nor saw a ah headlines this warning you k power plot wants law. it is super green. turns out to play the country's biggest carbon dioxide emitter emitter blistering energy crisis right now in the country to twitter tests, a new feature and a bit to try to make conversations more healthy by warning uses, things could get in ted, so it, it, we put that plan up for debate they long ago lost control of their product. this is just another laughable way that they're yelling into the breeze for a horse that has long ago left the bar. they can kick you want to get put up signs

. they can throw pumpkins at you, it's their lawn, they own it, they pay for it. and the church against the state in france were confessional secrets of child sex abuse seat catholic bishops, and the countries interior minister at loggerheads after a report revealed hundreds of thousands of crimes against children committed by the clergy. that a live report coming up for a correspondent in paris. ah, oh hey, to want to know. good morning for russia this tuesday, the 12th of october. it's kevin, over here with you live from ortiz, world news, h q. moscow with our latest. and 1st, the british energy crisis is deepening this morning with warnings that there could be even more gas price hikes, industries of really feeling the pinch. now they say some of them could go bust the question is, are they not ready than to suspend their environmental aspirations?

for at least the time big because it's been revealed at one power plant in the u. k, which is once hailed is super green, is turned out to be the country's greatest c o 2 emitter burning wood at this scale generates $15.00 micro tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year of which 13.3 magazines alone comes from one power station drex, the world's largest would burner the scale of wood burning by drax. each year means that the power station is one of the top 5 emitters of particulate matter air pollution in europe, putting it in the same company as some of europe's worst coal power plants. greener kina? renewable energy is what the well this calling for bats when an energy crisis looming in europe this winter. there's a rush to sub par, fossil fuels, and moves that will perish. carbon dioxide emissions are far from where policy makers want it to be. and this power plant in drax, in the north of england, claims to be the answer to the dilemma by switching to ben biomass or words,

rather than call the blind claims of the missions from burning wood and negated by the growth of new trees, soaking up carbon again and replacing those harvested for burning sounds good, right? i don't know how they prove it and establish this carbon neutral. but if it is great and if it will makes it a bit clean. it's got to be very romero. yes, good thing. i'd say, if you could say job for you, shot completely go carbon neutral it. i was still aware quite a bit of where to go. yes. i mean as far as i can see or tell that to haven't beaten it, anything different added to it. but according to a report, the power station is far from green, and it's actually the country's biggest emitter of carbon pollution. one still it's the 3rd dirtiest in europe, in fact. and drives is the only by m, a facility to rank in the continents plan of c o, 2 emitted, today you have it while selling itself as carbon neutral learning would actually

bounces out more emissions and from burning coal, you to its lower energy density than fossil fuels would, has to be burned in higher volumes to produce the same amount of energy. brought in no attempt to clear the air. drax responded to the claim, saying the figures of false figures are inaccurate and completely at all. it's with what the world's leading climate scientists at the you and the intergovernmental panel on climate change say the both sustainable bio mass been crucial to deliver in global climate targets. despite the figures the site still managed to attract more than 800000000 pounds in u. k. government subsidies. that's a 2000000 pounds every single day in 2020 alone. because of course, briar energy production reflects well on the government's climate record. but all of this is left the locals at boiling point, shocking mailing it to be for costing $3000000.00. yeah, that's not very good. if that's true, that is of worry. yeah, that's,

that's not good road, not very good at to lena nod robert, go to some to go up by a light to the community more than anything can live around there to build up a bit better. it baffled the children and bring blah more than oh wow. then go to a bigger power station law. so despite the neutral a negative pledges, in this case, buyer energy seems to be failing to protect the planets. in fact, it seems to be making matters worse. the government is trying to reduce carbon dioxide side subsidizing something that is hugely or covering carbon dioxide. seems to be a very strange way of spending government money. it's green when it wants to be positive in the new cycle, but it's not green. when it looks at the need to ensure that we have fuel security . it's because it's an ideology. they've almost got to the stage where it becomes a religion. for them, nothing matters more than ensuring that we remove carbon dioxide and move to the

green, a gender. of course, for many of them there will be a financial benefit. some of them will sit on boards of directors of the new green companies. others will be part of the non governmental organizations that receive funding from the european union and other countries that also support the green agenda. we touched on this yesterday. we're bringing him on it to day debate over confessional, secrecy is balling in france. as the country's top bishop says, it prevents the church from reporting child sex abuse. it comes off. her reports revealed of a 300000 children, were abused within the french catholic church, over the past 70 years. the bishops to discuss this now with the countries interior minister later today as get late st on it see what so that my bring go to parish al davinsky. there shall a good morning as severely damning report for the catholic church that take us

through what is expected later on than this meeting. that's right, francis top bishop is getting ready for a grilling by the french government by the interior minister himself as he's due to appear before him later on tuesday afternoon. now this is eric do long before who has been summoned by the french government after suggesting that priests shouldn't go to the police after they've heard a confession where somebody says that they have sexually abused a child. he made these remarks in the aftermath of that explosive report that was released by the solve a commission last week into child sexual abuse into the catholic church here in france. now that report found that at least $330000.00 children had been abused over a period of 70 years. and that 2 thirds of the victims were those who had been victimized by the priests themselves in the church. that 80 percent of the cases were boys

aged between 10 and 13 years old and that not only did the church do anything to prevent what was happening, but it also failed to report it. now here in france, it is illegal not to report any allegations of sexual abuse against a minor their faces, people with fines or even jail sentences for not doing that. but despite this, i eric do mumble for suggested that the right of confession, the secrecy ad that has always been in that right. a confession needs to continue. and that would be above take precedence over the laws of the republic. here in france, that's not only angered the french government, but it angered people here in paris. by much collectivity, i believe that they should sister magically denounce it. they are responsible for

their press. yes. so they must train them, isn't they in contact with the public? so they have to check that everything is going well. they need to face up to the responsibility and take responsibility is just crazy. may i'd? yeah, i don't. i don't know how it continues to carry out. a resident mazama did to me, it turned me away from faith. this way of thinking this bassetti turned me away from the faith to day. i no longer want to enter a charge because of that. so yes, it took me away from the faith. so somewhere they lose credibility, they lose their divine message at the base. it is unacceptable to day. it is an acceptable with all that we now know. now it is impossible. now this things here are really documented. so act as they are not to continue to hide behind the law of religion, which was now while senior members of the catholic church in france and the vatican themselves. the pope have expressed shame about the contents that were revealed by the silver commission for many. this is just another one,

too many reports showing the abuse it's been taking place in the catholic church for decades, potentially even centuries. and for one victim here in france who spoken to us at our tea, he says that what eric do not before has said in regards to the right of confession, taking precedence over the laws of the french or public shows that there is a serious problem within the french catholic church through voskus hillary lead the most high think that this is the demonstration. once again, the incomprehension and the out of touch, dimension of these men of the church, they have cut themselves off from society in the realities of life. and this has led them to be out of control, and when one is capable of committing so many crimes when one is capable of carrying out such a work of death than its concealment, it does indeed leave an aroma of crime against humanity. which raises questions which raises serious questions him well, so concerned is false. why therefore,

that he and to others have now taking this unprecedented this extraordinary step and called for the resignation of all the bishops of the catholic church. here in france, he really believes it, this situation is that serious? now while that is an likely to happen, what is clear is that the saw of a commission support is exclusive as it was, was perhaps meant to be the road for a reparations for the church to repairing its image. after letting people know about these crimes. in reality, what it seems to be doing is and doing the church completely. yeah, hugely controversial has gone over so long and so many people feel so wrong, don't they show dimansky keepers up to speed on this meeting later on? they come back to was ladia. thank you. no online discussions of long been known to descend and so digital mosh pits, sometimes they just get routed other times and get pretty much shut. they're not offensive. so no twitter thinks has got an answer is trying out

a new feature or could go wrong. that warns uses about sir, that they're about to enter an online chat so that it could get quite heated. although some of the conversations being flagged in the trial of met with more than a bit of bemusement. oh, what's this about twitter cyclical? sh. whoa, there are intense conversation about the weather bro. seriously, this is the lamest one yet. to return what's intense about this conversation go believe this is happening earlier under intense conversations. so in theory ads it works well. if twitter spots a chat thread with opposing views being thrashed out and someone wants to join in a note is pops up saying heads up. conversations like this could be intense. it's

not clear the whether to it says scanning for contentious subject matter or the actual content of the conversation column. bray discuss it with a panel of experts. this sound like a noble idea that's doomed to fail because if it's moderated by humans, it's open to claims of subjectivity. if it's algorithms, what we'll now how they can't really understand the nuances of language and discussion kind of work. no, no. is the very simple answer there and twitter itself has no idea how to moderate it, and winds up getting the vast brunt of some of the most insane arguments that bubble up on that site. so they long ago lost control of their product. this is just another laughable way that they're yelling into the breeze for a horse that has long ago left the bard. this is no goose mistake. twitter is not fumbling the ball. they're not somehow incapable of managing their audience. it is going exactly as planned. imagine the idea when you watch television or anywhere

the world, you get a disclaimer. the following contains lipstick. children be advised, do you want to watch it? yes, you do. the 2nd, they put up a warning saying whatever you do, don't touch that, dia, whatever you do, don't push the red button. i'm going to be the 1st in line along with millions of others to push the red button. this is the perfect brand new bait hook in the cheek off we go. is there a danger that there are certain people, certain company, certain subjects they're going to fulfill be judged before any auto bodies even taking place? absolutely. they miss is already algorithmically put to the top of the queue. it's already algorithmically fed to everybody because there is at the base level, no difference between intense content and profitable content. the content that people want to engage with that stay on the site longer. and therefore give twitter

more opportunity to serve ads in between everything else. it would be intellectually honest for us to remember that it is a free platform like facebook, a free platform. they make all the money you get to play on their front yard. they on the lawn, they can kick you off, they can put up signs, they can throw pumpkins at you, it's their law, they own it, they pay for it. we just go crazy on it. so pretending like a phone call where you have an implied a privacy inter action is folly. the fact is we're guests there at somebody else's dinner table and they keep throwing hand grenades and the soup a know that the more engage when you get the more rancor and the more engage when you get the more ads. but also you get more of a discourse on why there shouldn't be rancor. so twitter is, is to me the most incompetent of, of the people doing it because they are the most scared of their audience. but then again, if i worked at twitter,

i'd probably be the most scared of my audience do when the free speech advocates like this. let's face it, they can be the noisy or end of the digital conversation company because no one's getting bad. no one's getting thrown off the conversation is still allowed to happen. that's a good thing, isn't it? well, in my opinion, it is what's offensive to you is not offensive to me. and who's to say what is offensive. so that's why it's again, again, it's private property. so we do have these issues and problems. think of the beauty though. if you're a politician, you can do horrible things. you can stand up and say, i'm going to defend little timmy was not even born yet. for something that may offend it, and i'm to squelch conversation to put up warning flags and all that. meanwhile, what they physically do, or legislative leave do, or to a policy is truly offensive, and there's no warning for that. it just happens. and then we all get caught. meanwhile, high spokes, been accused of being offensive and promoting divisive an extreme content and

trying to influence its uses. we check in fact, claims and true. enjoy freedom of speech on social media. well, it sounds like it's about to change the face, but was a blow, a has a plan on how to fix the evil and harmful system. a plan may destroy the internet as we know it. and she presented it from the senate. i strongly encourage reforming section 230, what a section 230. and why is it so important to provide immunity from liability to website platforms? for instance, it doesn't allow anybody to serve facebook for any content created bytes uses mock zuckerberg himself is far from a moral beacon. placement was widely criticized for an anti conservative bias in recent years. facebook had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative stories disadvantaging conservative content centering, conservative bloggers, blocking and sensing religious and conservative political content to the platform

was never moderated from the outside. many guys on capitol hill that comp setting. the new a superstar whistleblower has found a perfect solution user generated content is something that companies have less control over their a 100 percent control over their algorithms. algorithms i, i based mechanisms which determine how your facebook feed looks. what post you see 1st thing in the morning, a picture of your friends, newborn baby, a viral cap video or an offensive political mean. right now the algorithms are controlled by facebook and the operating principles of far from transparent. the company has long drawn criticism for not sharing many details on how the content is prioritized. these technological systems are walled off air, very complicated. they have put their astronomical prophets for people, money driven decision making, shaping your faith. so one fac, how about political sense?

it algorithm is controlled by the u. s. government much better. what a great way to spread american values, all the majority party to the 1st quarters of the us. people lives in bob way, can't wait to appreciate it. with the proposed governmental body directly in charge of facebook algorithms, that would be no constraints. facebook seems to be eager to cooperate with the authorities. instead of expecting the industry to make societal decisions that belong to legislators, it is time for congress to act. the current algorithms are definitely far from perfect, but i bet will miss them. what's the gilman guessing show much? imagine what a u. s. sense of the social media would look like. videos of a messy afghanistan withdrawal. definitely not interesting. and to graphic. don't show it to anybody. the biden the stumbles on the steps. no, no, no. that's just offensive. and digest your friends graduation bridges. ok. but as i have a look at the gender neutral actor and the new website to read

a movie, i am your fabulous god mobile. no more inconvenient me was and by didn't old man jumps to be content pre approved by the us government. well, if that's what happens to social media, maybe we'll find these thought living in the real well, maybe tuesday morning, the total vote toby without international and me kevin o in. thanks for your company. turn off the break a sex scandal and strike the scene. you can roll into the headlines, an investigation into the alleged abuse of a teenage girl by prince on whose been drove by the case met to lace. but he still not off the hook fall from it, as they prob continues in the us. ah ah, join me every thursday on the alex simon,

sure. i'll be speaking to guess in the world of politics, sport, business, i'm show business. i'll see you then. mm. ah. ah, ah. ah, chinese banker, not countable lending against entrepreneurs necessarily. they only wanna blend against real estate speculation. so this is created the biggest real estate bubble

in history. that's now collapsing. ah, good morning, if you're watching the caught this all the time knows exactly 22 minutes past the hour and investigation and to britain's prince. andrew of a sex assault allegations has been dropped by authorities in the u. k. off for a review of documents is surprised many, the metropolitan police says it won't take any further action. the prince had previously strongly denied all the allegations against him. poly boycott picks up the story. hapless prince andrew, the duke of york. the queen's 2nd son on the subject of the biggest car crash interview in living memory. it's almost a mental health issue to some extent for me under maybe about to get away with it in a way that only a royal can. he stands accused of having forced sex with

a girl called virginia roberts, now jew frey, who was 17, back in 2001, and was traffic by suicide pito. jeffrey epstein, one of andrews main lines of defense is i have no recollection of it for me. she said no more. so which is the criminal? i'm just putting his hands over his eyes and shouting, la la la la, la, la la, even. ready this didn't joke his memory, a picture of him with his arm around you fray. he claims it's vague, but then again, he also claims it was almost impossible for me to, to sweat many people with eyes suggest that the evidence against andrew is pretty compelling. but fortunately for him not compelling enough for london's metropolitan police which is dropping its investigation, the metropolitan police are taking no further action following

a review of sexual abuse allegations surrounding prince andrew and jeffrey epstein . having reviewed the claims made by ju fray in a civil law suit in america and having questioned her in australia, the match says it's going to let this one go. matt police chief crested and dick said this about randy andy, back in august. see about the law. no one is above the law to phrase u. s. lawyer, sigrid mccauley is not happy. she says that the match should reopen its investigation into prince andrew given the clear and compelling evidence against him on standby. it statement that no one is above the law, tellingly though andrews. oh hi. emily appeared to be less convinced than the corpse over the weekend. it was reported the prince william, whose 2nd in line to the throne has made it clear that his dodgy uncle allegedly should never be allowed to return to public life again. prince andrew is right now,

bunkering down at the queen scottish residence. that's right, andrew has been hanging out at mummies castle avoiding the legal papers that accuse him of abusing g for a while at the home of the 3rd person and not now notorious photograph jolaine maxwell. and as well as properties belonging to jeffrey epstein. as we all know, epstein is conveniently dead. but maxwell, whose epstein ex girlfriend, is set to go on trial in new york. next month i accused a sex trafficking epstein just like andrew. she's pleading innocent. and either way, this is going to be a blockbuster, and you better stay in the queen's castle and pull up the drawbridge and may be no more interviews at the end of the day. a benefit of all the hindsight that one could have. it was definitely the wrong thing to do. well, nonetheless, prince andrew stepped back from a roll jude his 2019 to stop what he called disruption to the royal family. the

princes given an alibi for at least one of the alleged encounters, saying he was at a restaurant just outside london. that time for a british home office minister norman baker has dismissed speculation. now that the palace could have pressured the police to drop the case. and i don't believe that they would dismiss the case because prince andrew, prince andrew. i think they're more got more intense than that. but i think that as i say, the key point is that the metropolitan police police commissioner made the comment in the release of scotland yard. but it wasn't prod predominantly a matter of british jurisdiction because the allegations relate predominantly to or what happened on united states soil allocates going to the courts in america. so i think that may have taken a pragmatic view that as best left the to the states to take this matter forward. yes, so, i mean, he's innocent until proven guilty. we're going to an american talk case. so we'll

see what that, what that produces, of course, a problem with while families, it isn't. they are not. stackable. politicians are faculty members. are all family punch or that love of the problem? ok here, the manufacturers of rushes, putting the coven vaccine of criticised report in the british tabloid. the sun alleging moscow stole the formula to the astrazeneca job and used it to create its own. the gum layer institute stresses that, that story makes absolutely no scientific sense because split that uses the different longer lasting platform. the scientists say we discussed it with british of national health service search and, and consultant run sheet brock, who says there are a number of reasons why the allegations of baseless or the oxford ass astrazeneca vaccines calls. it sells chad offs. chimpanzee, at a new virus opposite that the chimpanzee wrecked, in fact, has been lambasted slightly in them in the russian pass on occasion, as being a monkey vaccine. and where's the camera lay institutes deliberates on their former

and formerly developed well known platform, which is 2 separate human told viruses to separate and no viruses. if you were going to copy someone's work, how would you then produce yours before they had produced the original that in itself makes more logical sense. in fact, that that leads to the superior efficacy and safety profile of the family is sheets, vaccines. and the fact that the eases t different agnew and vaccines and for the prime and boost chad means that there isn't cross reactivity. and it's that that leaves the, the, it's almost 9697 percent advocacy. and it doesn't have the same problems of safety profile with the from moses earlier such salinas sinus from moses fruits that you seen with the astrazeneca vaccine. so the sun paper then claims that anonymous intelligent sort, his was sure of the dim a potent spies had pinched the formula in person from the pharmaceutical giant. but

despite the apparent and consistency with the brush and short using different vectors, as we just heard, the british security minister chose to fan the flames while not confirming the story. i'm can't comment won't comment on the specific case, but it would be fair to say correct to say that we face threats of this type that are different. they're more sophisticated, they're more extensive than they ever have been before. we got the thought to journalist a broker snell, clark, he told us, have evidence existed that moscow had stolen the astrazeneca formula media and you care thought it would waste no time presenting it. what is interesting as to why this is tom out now isn't quite clear. we have no evidence because if there had been, let's face it. if there was hard evidence that russia had actually stolen or super rush, super russian agent, russian super agent in the lab that had taken away photograph document that been evidence based, then that would have been presented. that would certainly be presented in a press conference. if there was a smoking gun, so to speak,

there hasn't been to that full, we would conclude that there isn't any evidence for why they doing this for i started this wrong one. i think there was a correlation between these anti russian stories coming out and went public opinion is beginning to turn against the governing authorities if. ringback people have had enough all the restrictions in some parts of the page still going on. they don't want another locked down. they don't feel as if they're being told all the truth about what's been going on. that could explain why this precise moment when people are getting very, very angry at cross about government. and what's been going on that we get this bogey man. there's russian bab bogey man once again being sort of brought to the to, to the full. and you know, for me on, i'm a security sources. the other surround up so far this morning just had to go to a state decides to do the boom bus t with a great show. they got lined up for the break, watched. if you got tons morning but for now from a kevin, i was reporting from moscow h q big.