[000:00:00;00] with awe headlines this morning, a u. k. power plants once law did is super green. turns out to be the country's biggest carbon dioxide emitter, made a blistering energy crisis in the country on going twitter test a new feature a bit to make conversations more healthy by warning uses, things could get intense or hated. we put that plan up for debate. they long ago lost control of their product. this is just another laughable way that they're yelling in the breeze for a horse that has long ago left, the bar vacant,

kick you off, they can put up signs. they can throw pumpkins at you, it's their lawn. they own it, they pay for it. and the french government summons the country's top catholic, bishop of confessional secrets that prevents admissions of child sex abuse being reported ah, 10 o one most good time. good morning from russia this tuesday, the 12th of october. it's kevin, over here with you live from ortiz, world news, age q. so 1st, the british energy crisis is deepening with warnings that there could be even more gas price hikes. industries are filling the pinch. they said they could go bust over it. the question is, are they now ready than to suspend their environmental aspirations for at least the time being because it's been revealed that one power plant in the u. k,

which was once hailed as super green as turned out to be the country's greatest c o 2 emitter. the scale of wood burning by tracks each year means the power station is one of the top, 5 or misses, of particulate matter air pollution in europe. putting it in the same company as some of europe's worst coal power plants. greener kina? renewable energy is what the world is calling for bat. with an energy crisis looming in europe this winter. there's a rush to stop pa fossil fuels, a move that will perish, carbon dioxide emissions a far from where policy makers want it to be. and this power plant and drax, in the north of england, claims to be the onset to the dilemma by switching to ban biomass or would rather than call the plot claims of the mission from binding wood and negated by the growth of new trees, soaking up carbon again and replacing those harvested for burning sounds good, right? i don't know how they prove. it's an established it's carbon neutral,

but if it is great, anything will max he out of it clean is going to be very around there. yeah, that's a good thing. i'd say it's a good thing job, but you still have to completely get a copy in your to read it sheila, quite a bit of way to go. yes. i mean as far as i can see or tell that to haven't beaten it. anything different added to it, but according to a report, the power station is far from green, and it's actually the country's biggest emitter of carbon pollution. one still is the 3rd danasia in europe, in fact, and dr. is the only biomass facility to rank in the continents plan of c o 2 emitters. today you have it while selling itself as carbon neutral learning would actually bounces out more emissions and from burning coal you to its lower energy density than fossil fuels were to has to be burned in higher volumes to produce the same amount of energy. but in no attempt to clear the air, drax responded to the claim,

saying the figures of false figures are inaccurate and completely adults with what the world's leading climate. scientists at the unit into governmental panel on climate change say about sustainable bio mass being crucial to deliver in global climate targets. despite the figures the site still managed to attract more than 800000000 pounds in u. k. government subsidies. that's a 2000000 pounds every single day in 2020 alone because of course, via energy production reflects well on the government's climate record. but all of this is left the locals at boiling point. shocking melina theresa calls contain william. yeah, that's not very good. if that's true, that is of worry. yeah that's, that's not good road, not very good. actually. no, no, robert, go to some to go up by a light to the community more than anything can live around there to build up a bit better for the children and things lot more than, oh wow. then go to

a bigger power station law. so despite the neutral a negative pledges, in this case buyer energy seems to be failing to protect the planets. in fact, it seems to be making matters worse. the government is trying to reduce carbon dioxide side subsidizing something that is hugely or covering carbon dioxide. seems to be a very strange way of spending government money. it's green when it wants to be positive in the new cycle, but it's not green. when he looks at the need to ensure that we have fuel security . it's because it's an ideology. they've almost got to the stage where it becomes a religion. for them, nothing matters more than ensuring that we remove carbon dioxide and move to the green, a gender. of course, for many of them there will be a financial benefit. some of them will sit on boards of directors of the new green companies. others will be part of the non governmental organizations that receive

funding from the european union and other countries that also support the green agenda. right. those early the morning for most of us as go to the realm of online discussions next. and twitter thinks has got an answer for when conversations get a tad rowdy and in his opinion offensive. it's now trying at a new feature them that warns uses about to enter an online chat that he could get quite heated. although some of the stuff flagged in the trial is left uses a bit bemused. oh gosh. what's this about twitter cyclic sh. whoa, there are intense conversation about the weather bro. seriously, this is the last one yet. to return. what's intense about this conversation?

come believe this is happening on their under intense conversations. so then how does it work? well, if to a, to spot sir chat thread with opposing views, for instance being thrashed out and someone wants to join in a notice pops up, say, heads up conversations like this can be intense. now it's not clear whether twitter is actually scanning full, contentious subject matter all the actual content of a conversation color. bray discussed it with a panel of guests. this sound like a noble idea that's doomed to fail because if it's moderated by humans, it's open to claims of subjectivity. if it's algorithms, what we'll now how they can't really understand the nuances of language and discussion kind of work. no, no is the very simple answer there and twitter itself has no idea how to moderate it and winds up getting the vast brunt of some of the most insane arguments that bubble up on that site. so they long ago lost control of their product. this is

just another laughable way that they're yelling into the breeze for a horse that has long ago left the bard. this is no goose mistake. twitter is not fumbling the ball. they are not somehow incapable of managing their audience. it is going exactly as planned. imagine the idea when you watch television or anywhere the world did you get a disclaimer? the following contains lipstick. children be advised, do you want to watch it? yes, you do. the 2nd, they put up a warning saying whatever you do, don't touch that. dia, whatever you do, don't push the red button. i'm going to be the 1st in line along with millions of others to push the red button. this is the perfect brand new bait hook in the cheek off we go. is there a danger that there are certain people, certain company, certain subjects that can a full file be judged before any auto budgies even taking place? absolutely, if they this is already algorithmically put to the top of the queue. it's already

algorithmically fed to everybody because there is at the base level, no difference between intense content and profitable content. the content that people want to engage with that stay on the site longer, and therefore give twitter more opportunity to serve ads in between everything else . it would be intellectually honest for us to remember that it is a free platform like facebook, a free platform. they make all the money you get to play on their front yard. they on the lawn, they can kick you off, they can put up signs, they can throw pumpkins at you, it's their law, they own it, they pay for it. we just go crazy on it. so pretending like a phone call where you have an implied a privacy inter action is folly. the fact is we're guests there at somebody else's dinner table and they keep throwing hand grenades and the soup a know that the more engaged when you get the more rancor and the more engage when

you get the more ads. but also you get more of a discourse on why there shouldn't be rancor. so twitter is, is to me the most incompetent of, of the people doing it because they are the most scared of their audience. but then again, if i worked at twitter, i'd probably be the most scared of my audience duke. when the free speech advocates like this, let's face it, they can be the noisy or end of the digital conversation county because no one's getting bad. no one's getting thrown off the conversation is still allowed to happen. that's a good thing, isn't it? well, in my opinion, it is what's offensive to you is not offensive to me. and who's to say what is offensive. so that's why it's again, again, it's private property. so we do have these issues and problems. think of the beauty though. if you're a politician, you can do horrible things. you can stand up and say, i'm going to defend little timmy was not even born yet. for something that may offend it and i'm trying to squelch conversation to put up warning flags and all

that. meanwhile, what they physically do, or legislative leave do. ready or do it, policy is truly offensive and there's no warning for that. it just happens. and then we all get caught elsewhere. facebook's been accused of being offensive and promoting divisive and extreme content and trying to influence uses those fact check that says true and all enjoy freedom of speech on social media. well, it sounds like it's about to change. the facebook was a bla has a plan on how to fix the evil and harmful system. a plan that may destroy the internet as we know it. and she presented it from the senate. i strongly encourage reforming section 230. what is section 230, and why is it so important to provide immunity from liability to website platforms? for instance, it doesn't allow anybody to serve facebook for any content created bytes uses. mock, zuckerberg himself is far from

a moral beacon. placement was widely criticized for an antique and safety bias in recent years. facebook had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative stories disadvantaging, conservative content century conservative bloggers blocking and centering religious and conservative political content for the platform was never moderated from the outside. many guys on capitol hill that comp setting, the new a superstar whistleblower has found a perfect solution. user generated content is something that companies have less control over their a 100 percent control over their algorithms. algorithms i based mechanisms which determine how your facebook feed looks. what post you see 1st thing in the morning, a picture of your friends, newborn baby, a viral cap video or an offensive political mean. right now the algorithms are controlled by facebook and operating principles of far from transparent. the company has long drawn criticism for not sharing many details on how the content is

prioritized. these technological systems are walled off air, very complicated. they have put their astronomical prophets for people, money driven decision making, shaping your fade. so one fac, how about political sense? it algorithms controlled by the u. s. government much better. what a great way to spread american values all the majority party to the 1st quarters of the us. people if symbolic way, can't wait to appreciate it. with the proposed governmental body directly in charge of facebook algorithms, that would be no constraints. facebook seems to be eager to cooperate with the authorities. instead of expecting the industry to make societal decisions that belong to legislators, it is time for congress to act. the current algorithms are definitely far from perfect, but i bet will miss them. what's the government guessing charge? imagine what a u. s. sense of the social media would look like. videos of

a messy afghanistan withdrawal. definitely not interesting and to graphic. don't show it to anybody. first, the biden the stumbles on the steps. no, no, no. that's just defensive and digest your friends graduation bridges. ok. but as i have a look at the agenda neutral actor and they knew what cinderella movie, i am your fabulous god. no more inconvenient means and bite an old man drinks the content pre approved by the u. s. government. well, if that's what happens to social media, maybe we'll find he's not living in the real world. a real big debate over confessional, secrecy is boring. over in france, as the countries talk, bishop says it prevents the church from disclosing admissions of child sex abuse. it comes off for report revealed over $300000.00 children, were abused within the french catholic church. over the past 70 is the bishop's. you to discuss it with the countries interior minister later today,

i spoke about it. we shall to penske in paris this morning. francis top bishop is getting ready for a grilling by the french government after suggesting that priests shouldn't go to the police after they've heard a confession where somebody says that they have sexually abused a child. he made these remarks in the aftermath of that explosive report that was released by the solve a commission law suite. that report found that at least $330000.00 children had been abused over a period of 70 years. and that 2 thirds of the victims were those who had been victimized by the priests themselves in the church. that 80 percent of the cases were boys aged between 10 and 13 years old. and that not only did the church do anything to prevent what was happening, but it also failed to report it. that's not only anger the french government, but it angered people here in paris. by much collectively,

i believed that they should systematically denounce it. they are responsible for their press. yes. so they must train them, isn't they in contact with the public so they have to check that everything is going well. they need to face up to the responsibility and take responsibility is just crazy to me. i'd. yeah, i don't, i don't know how it continues to carry out. a resident mazama did to me, it turned me away from faith. this way of thinking this bassetti turned me away from the faith to day. i no longer want to enter a charge because of that. so yes, it took me away from the faith. so somewhere they lose credibility. they lose their divine message at the base. it is unacceptable. today. it is an acceptable of all that we now know. now it is impossible. now this things here are really documented . so act, they are not to continue to hide behind the law of religion. now while senior members of the catholic church in france and the vatican themselves,

the pope have expressed shame about the contents that were revealed by the solve a commission for many. this is just another one. too many reports showing the abuse it's been taking place in the catholic church for decades, potentially even centuries. and for one victim here in france, he spoken to us at r t. he says that what eric do not before has said it shows that there is a serious problem within the french catholic church. true bolcko's hillary led him or i think that this is the demonstration. once again, the incomprehension and the out of touch, dimension of these men of the church, they have cut themselves off from society in the realities of life. and this has led them to be out of control when one is capable of committing so many crimes. when one is capable of carrying out such a work of death than its concealment, it does indeed leave an aroma of crime against humanity which raises questions which raises serious questions. him, what is clear is that the saw of

a commission support is exclusive as it was, was perhaps meant to be the road for a reparations for the church to repairing its image after letting people know about these crimes. in reality, what it seems to be doing is and doing the church completely ashad rescued with me earlier on tuesday morning, 12th of october with our team across another sex scandal after the break. that the main lines of defense is i have no recollection of ever mrs. lady numbers one, which is the girl, and i'm just putting his hands over his eyes and shouting, la la la la, la, la, la will, as widespread consternation after police abruptly draw, put investigation into the alleged abuse of a teenage girl by prince andrew, still not off the hook, though, as the prob, continues over the states, lou

ah, join me every thursday on the alex, simon, sure, and i'll be speaking to guess of the world of politics, sport, business, i'm sure business. i'll see you then. mm hm. oh, driven by drink shaped bankers. so those with there's sinks, we dare to ask a

bank account or landing against entrepreneurs necessarily. they only wanna blend against real estate regulation. so this was created the biggest real estate babylon history that's now collapsing. ah again, good morning. this is r t is exactly 20 minutes. sponsor if you're watching the clock let celebrate this next story investigation into britain. this prince andrew, of a sex assault allegations has been dropped then by authorities in the u. k. out for a review of documents as it was described, the metropolitan police. it won't take any further action. the prince has previously strongly denied all the allegations against him. bully boy care picks up the story. hapless prince andrew, the duke of york. the queen's 2nd son on the subject of the biggest car crash interview in living memory. it's almost

a mental health issue to some extent for me under maybe about to get away with it in a way that only a royal can. he stands accused of having forced sex with a go called virginia roberts, now jew frey, who was 17, back in 2001, and was traffic by suicide pito. jeffrey epstein, one of andres main lines of defense, is i have no recollection of it for me load number, which is the equivalent. i'm just putting his hands over his eyes and shouting, la la la la, la, la la, even. ready this didn't joke his memory, a picture of him with his arm around you fray. he claims it's vague, but then again, he also claims it was almost impossible for me to start to sweat. many people with eyes suggest that the evidence against andrew is pretty compelling. but fortunately for him not compelling enough for london's metropolitan police which is dropping its investigation,

the metropolitan police are taking no further action following a review into sexual abuse allocation surrounding prince andrew and jeffrey epstein . having reviewed the claims made by ju fray in a civil law suit in america and having questioned her in australia, the mat says it's going to let this one go mat police chief crested. and dick said this about randy andy, back in august to see about the move. no one is above the law to phrase u. s. lawyer sigrid mccauley is not happy. she says that the match should reopen its investigation into prince andrew, given the clear and compelling evidence against him on standby. it statement that no one is above the law, tellingly though andrews o family appear to be less convinced than the corpse over the weekend. it was reported that prince william, who's a 2nd in line to the throne, has made it clear that his dodgy uncle allegedly should never be allowed to return

to public life again. prince andrew is right now, bunkering down at the coin scottish residence. that's right. andrews been hanging out at mummies castle avoiding the legal papers, but accused him of abusing g for a while at the home of the 3rd person and not now notorious photograph jolaine maxwell. and as well as properties belonging to jeffrey epstein. as we all know, epstein is conveniently dead, but might swell, whose epstein ex girlfriend is set to go on trial in new york. next month i accused a sex trafficking, but epstein just like andrew, she's pleading innocent. and either way, this is going to be a blockbuster, and you better stay in the queen's castle and pull up the drawbridge, and maybe no more interviews are my the prisoners, starbucks mal roll duties and 2019 to stop what he called disruption to the royal family the prince has given an alibi for at least one of the alleged counts is saying he was at

a restaurant outside london at the time for what british home or 1st minister won't . baker has dismissed speculation. now that the palace could have pressured the police to drop the case. i don't believe that they would dismiss the case because prince andrew, prince andrew. i think they're more got more intense than that. but i think they also say the key point is that the metropolitan police police commissioner made the comment in the release from scotland yard. but it wasn't prod predominantly a matter of british jurisdiction because the allegations relate predominantly to what happened on united states soil allocates going to the courts in america. so i think the american pragmatic view that as best left the, to the states to take this matter forward. yes. so, i mean, he's innocent until proven guilty. we're going through an american talk chased. so see what that, what that produces. of course, a problem with royal families isn't they are not stackable. politicians are faculty

members are all family punch or that love of the problem. you will swooning a diplomatic spat spring between algeria and france with president to boon demanding. total respect from paris is countries of former colonial master relations between the 2 remains strained over comments by the french president and new visa restrictions. we can't act like nothing happened, and our ambassador will only return to paris when france shows total respect for the all jerry and state will aside from recalling at some pastor, algeria is also banned french military plains at the moment from his air space. the move comes after remarks by president micron in which he claimed the former colony is ruled by a political military system, which is full of hatred towards france. micron even reportedly asked if algeria existed before french colonaze zation. paris says reduced its allocation of these is now for algerians. moroccans and tennesseans accusing his former colonies of not

doing enough to allow illegal immigrants to return. historian ortho gerald horn thinks that the motive behind president microns actions has got more to do though with french elections than algeria. mister brooklyn is facing a very difficult reelection campaign. mister mc chrome feels that he has to step up the rhetoric against algiers. the french economy is heavily dependent upon exploitation of north africans. so in addition to the full paw with regard to circumventing a bilateral process concerning vsa allocation of frances, also hampering its economy. mister macross is engaging in a bill cynicism when he brings up the spurious claims about how algeria supposedly hate france. and i should also add that given the horrors inflicted upon algeria during the decades of colonial occupation from 1830 to 1962,

algeria might have good reason to despise paris will continue to follow the twists and turns of it, but as the round up. so far from me, kevin. oh. busy in the auto team here. big thanks for checking in. have a great tuesday, but don't go way. stay if you can. max kaiser with his team here. the latest cars report not to be missed. official break. ah. ah. ah. ah.

ah. when i see black marriage, i see part of myself, i was growing. young black america spoke to me when white astride it did not. those who say black lives matter is a movement we are importing from america. know nothing of who we are. i lived in a world where white lives mattered. and i was not white. like ms. newman and i wasn't known from black america. i learned how to speak back to whiteness. aboriginal people here are no every die. we're out wanted them now with the police . were out with she states, i'm scared that more children are going to grow up in the country that think says no racism, but they're more likely to end up in the criminal justice system. then there are

other fellow friends in daycare i ah i unmatched kaiser. this is the kaiser report, you know, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. stacey megs, i think you're talking about george soros is his portfolio. well, certainly his theories on reflex 70 because we're going to talk about this because i think for me it helps explain the situation out of china regarding ever grand,

the largest property developer in the world. well, certainly the one with the largest debt, $300000000.00 in debt gone horribly wrong here is from investor pedia, understanding reflexively, reflex city theory states that investors don't base their decisions on reality, but rather on their perceptions of reality. instead, the actions that result from these perceptions have an impact on reality or fundamentals, which then affects investors perceptions and thus prices the process of self reinforcing and tends toward this equilibrium causing prices to become increasingly detached from reality. soros views the global financial crisis as an illustration of the theory. in his view, rising home prices induced banks to increase their home mortgage lending and in turn increased lending helped drive up home prices without a check on rising prices. this resulted in