ah d o ah headlines, a swanny u. k. power plant once load the suit, the green turns out to be the country's biggest carbon dioxide admit, made a blistering energy crisis ongoing in the country. twitter tests a new feature and a bid to make conversations more healthy by warning uses. things could getting 10 so hated. we put that planet for debate they long ago lost control of their product . this is just another laughable way that they're yelling in the breeze for off worst that has long ago left the bar. they can kick you off, they can put up signs, they can throw pumpkins at you,

it's their law and they own it. they pay forward on the french government summons the country's top catholic bishop over confessional secrets that prevent admissions of child sex abuse being reported ah, oh, good morning from russia this tuesday, the 12th of october. my name is kevin o, in here with you for the next half hour, with our latest from ortiz, world news, age q. and 1st, the british energy crisis is deepening today with warnings that they could be even more gas price hikes. industries of feeling the pinch, they say they could even go bust over it. some of them. the question is they know they're ready to suspend their environmental aspirations if only for the time being because it's been revealed at one power plants in the u. k, particularly, which is once hailed as a super green one is turned out to be the country's greatest c o 2 emitter. the

scale of wood burning by tracks each year means the power station is one of the top 5 misses of particulate matter and pollution in europe, putting it in the same company as some of europe's worst coal power plants. greener . kina renewable energy is what the well this calling for bats with an energy crisis looming in europe this winter. there's a rush to stop pa fossil fuels, a move that will perish, carbon dioxide emissions a far from where policy makers want it to be. and this power plant in drax, in the north of england, claims to be the onset to the die. lemme by switching to been by a mass or would rather than coal. the plant claims of emissions from binding wood and negated by the growth of new trees, soaking up carbon again and replacing those harvested for burning sounds good, right? i don't know how they prove it and establish this carbon neutral. but if it is great, anything will max, he out of it clean is going to be better on it. yeah,

that's a good thing. i'd say. if you could say job for yourself to completely get a copy in your to it, it should have a quite a bit to where to go. yes, i mean, as far as i can see or tell that to haven't beaten it, anything different out of to it. but according to a report the power station is far from green. and it's actually the country's biggest emitter of carbon pollution. one still it's the 3rd danasia in europe in fact, and drives is the only biomass facility to rank in the contents plan of c o 2 emitted . today you have it while selling itself as carbon neutral learning would actually bounces out more emissions and from burning coal you to its lower energy density than fossil fuels were to has to be burned in higher volumes to produce the same amount of energy brought in no attempt to clear the air drax responded to the claim, saying the figures of false figures are inaccurate and completely adults with what

the world's leading climate. scientists at the you and into governments panel on climate change say about sustainable bio mass been crucial to deliver in global climate targets. despite the figures the site still managed to attract more than 800000000 pounds, a new k government subsidies. that's a 2000000 pounds every single day in 2020 alone because of course, right. energy production reflects well on the government's climate record, but all of this is left the locals at boiling points. shocking mailing it to her. constantly william. yeah, that's not very good. if that's true, that is a worry. yeah that's, that's not good. well, not very good. actually. now, no rabbit go to some of the go out there allied to the community more than anything can light round there to build up a bit better in there for the children and zing. glad a lot more than oh, rather than go to were a bigger power station la la. so despite the neutral a negative pledges, in this case by our energy seems to be failing to protect the planet. in fact,

it seems to be making matters worse. the government is trying to reduce carbon dioxide subsidizing something that is hugely covering. carbon dioxide seems to be a very strange way of spending government money. it's green when it wants to be positive in the new cycle, but it's not green. when he looks at the need to ensure that we have fuel security . it's because it's an ideology. they've almost got to the stage where it becomes a religion. for them, nothing matters more than ensuring that we remove carbon dioxide and move to the green agenda. of course, for many of them, there will be a financial benefit. some of them will sit on boards of directors of the new green companies. others will be part of the non governmental organizations that receive funding from the european union and other countries that also support the green

agenda. right. few minutes. so now sir, look at the realm of online discussions next. and 1st of twitter thinks he's got an answer for when conversations get rowdy and it's opinion offensive is now try got a new feature then that won't uses about to enter an online chat that it could get quite heated in there. although some of the stuff flagged in the trial left uses a bit bemused. oh gosh. what's this about twitter seclusion? sh. whoa, there are intense conversation about the weather bro. seriously, this is the lamest one yet. to return. what's intense about this conversation? come believe this is happening on here under intense conversations. so the $1000000.00 question as it work. well, it seems if twitter spots

a chat thread with opposing views being thrashed out and so wants to join in and notice pops up saying heads up. conversations like that can be intense. it's not clear though, whether a twitter is scanning for contention, subject matter or the actual content of the conversation. calibrate, discussed it with a panel of experts. this sound like a noble idea that is doomed to fail because if it's moderated by humans, it's open to claims of subjectivity. if it's algorithms, what we'll now how they can't really understand the nuances of language and discussion kind of work. no, no is the very simple answer there and twitter itself has no idea how to moderate it and winds up getting the vast brunt of some of the most insane arguments that bubble up on that site. so they long ago lost control of their product. this is just another laughable way that they're yelling into the breeze for a horse that has long ago left the bard. this is no goose mistake. twitter is not

fumbling the ball. they are not somehow incapable of managing their audience. it is going exactly as planned. imagine the idea when you watch television or anywhere the world and you get a disclaimer, the following contains lipstick. children be advised, do you want to watch it? yes, you do. the 2nd, they put up a warning saying whatever you do, don't touch that. dia, whatever you do, don't push the red button. i'm going to be the 1st in line along with millions of others to push the red button. this is the perfect brand new bait hook in the cheek off we go. is there a danger that there are certain people, certain company, certain subjects that can a full file be judged before any auto body is even taken place? absolutely, they, this is already algorithmically put to the top of the queue. it's already algorithmically fed to everybody because there is at the base level, no difference between intense content and profitable content. the content that

people want to engage with that stay on the site longer, and therefore give twitter more opportunity to serve ads in between everything else . it would be intellectually honest for us to remember that it is a free platform like facebook, a free platform. they make all the money you get to play on their front yard. they on the lawn, they can kick you off. they could put up signs, they can throw pumpkins at you, it's their lawn, they own it, they pay for it. we just go crazy on it. so pretending like a phone call where you have an implied, a privacy interaction is folly. the fact is were guests there at somebody else's dinner table and they keep throwing hand grenades and the soup a know that the more engaged when you get the more rancor and the more engage when you get the more ads. but also you get more of a discourse on why there shouldn't be rancor. so twitter is,

is to me the most incompetent of, of the people doing it because they are the most scared of their audience. but then again, if i worked at twitter, i'd probably be the most scared of my audience duke. when the free speech advocates like this, let's face it, they can be the noisy or end of the digital conversation county because no one's getting bad. no one's getting thrown off the conversation is still allowed to happen. that's a good thing, isn't it? well, in my opinion, it is what's offensive to you is not offensive to me. and who's to say what is offensive. so that's why it's again, again, it's private property. so we do have these issues and problems. think of the beauty though. if you're a politician, you can do horrible things. you can stand up and say, i'm going to defend little timmy was not even born yet. for something that may offend it and i'm squelch conversation to put up warning flags and all that. meanwhile, what they physically do or legislative leave do. ready or to a policy is truly offensive,

and there's no warning for that. it just happens. and then we all get caught elsewhere. pressure grows on facebook to so it's how so to try this word in congress to hold the platform liable for content posted, they will impact some of that vienna enjoy freedom of speech on social media. well, it sounds like it's about to change. the facebook was a blow, a has a plan on how to fix the evil in the harmful system. a plan that may destroy the internet as we know it. and she presented it confronting the senate. i strongly encourage reforming section 230. what is section 230, and why is it so important to provide immunity from liability to website platforms? for instance, it doesn't allow anybody to serve facebook for any content created bytes uses mock zuckerberg himself is far from a moral beacon. facebook was widely criticized for an antique and sifted bias in recent years. facebook had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative stories

disadvantaging, conservative content century conservative bloggers blocking and centering religious and conservative political content for the platform was never moderated from the outside. from any guys on capitol hill, that's how upsetting the new a superstar whistleblower has found. a perfect solution. user generated content is something that companies have less control over their a 100 percent control over their algorithms. algorithms i based mechanisms which determine how your facebook feed looks, what post you see 1st thing in the morning, a picture of your friends, newborn baby, a viral cap video, or an offensive political mean. right now, the algorithms are controlled by facebook and the operating principles of far from transparent the company has long drawn criticism for not sharing many details on how the content is prioritized. these technological systems are walled off air, very complicated. they have put their astronomical prophets before people,

money driven decision making, shaving, you'll fade so one fac, how about political sense? it algorithm is controlled by the u. s. government much better. what a great way to spread american values, all the majority party to the furthest corners of the earth. people if symbolic way, can't wait to appreciate it. with the proposed governmental body directly in charge of facebook algorithms, there would be no constraints. facebook seems to be eager to cooperate with the authorities. instead of expecting the industry to make societal decisions that belong to legislators. it is time for congress to act. the current algorithms are definitely far from perfect, but i bet will miss them. what's the government guessing charge? imagine what a u. s. sense of the social media would look like. videos of a messy afghanistan withdrawal. definitely not interesting. and to graphic. don't show it to anybody. first, the biden stumbles on the steps. no, no,

no. that's just offensive. and digest your friends graduation bridges. ok. but as i have a look at the gender neutral actor and they knew what the cinderella movie, i am your fabulous god mobile. no more inconvenient means and bided an old man drinks. and he coated pre approved by the us government. well, if that's what happens to social media, maybe we'll finally start living in the real world. right. more next on a big story we started bringing. yes. the a debate over confessional, secrecy is boiling in france. as the country's top bishop says, it prevents the church from disclosing admissions of child sex abuse. it comes after a report re revealed it over $300000.00 children, were abused within the french catholic church, over the past 70 years. the bishops to, to discuss it with the countries interior minister later today shall advance his in paris with the latest. francis top, bishop is getting ready for

a grilling by the french government. after suggesting that priests shouldn't go to the police after they've heard a confession where somebody says that they have sexually abused a child, he made these remarks in the aftermath of that explosive report that was released by the solve a commission last week. that report found that at least $330000.00 children had been abused over a period of 70 years. and that 2 thirds of the victims were those who had been victimized by the priests themselves in the church. that 80 percent of the cases were boys aged between 10 and 13 years old and that not only did the church do anything to prevent what was happening, but it also failed to report it. that's not only anger the french government, but it angered people here in paris by much collectively i believe that they should

systematically denounce it. they are responsible for they press yes. so they must train them, it is and then contact with the public. so they have to check that everything is going well. the needs of face up to the responsibility and take responsibility is just crazy. it's may, i'd. yeah, i don't. i don't know how it continues to carry out. already, don't mazama did on this. we're thinking this bassetti, it took me away from the face to day. i no longer wanna turn to church because of that. they will screw the ability, they lose their device message. it's an acceptable today is an acceptable with all this we now? no, no, it's impossible. now this thinks he a really documented to act, thou know, to continue to hide behind the law of religion who are both now while senior members of the catholic church in france and the vatican themselves, the pope have expressed shame about the contents that were revealed by the silver commission many, this is just another one too many reports showing the abuse. it's been taking place

in the catholic church for decades, potentially even centuries. and for one victim here in france who spoken to us at r t, he says that what eric do not before has said it shows that there's a serious problem. within the french catholic church. true bolcko's hillary led him off. i think that this is the demonstration, once again, the incomprehension and the out of touch, dimension of these men of the church. they have cut themselves off from society in the realities of life. and this has led them to be out of control. and when one is capable of committing so many crimes, when one is capable of carrying out such a work of death than its concealment, it does indeed leave an aroma of crime against humanity. which raises questions which raises serious questions. him, what is clear is that the saw of a commission support is exclusive as it was, was perhaps meant to be the road for a reparations for the church to repairing its image after letting people know about

these crimes. in reality, what it seems to be doing is and doing the church completely shaw davinsky with that was me earlier on this morning. talk me through it now. it's tuesday morning or late tuesday morning here. that's coming up to a quarter past 11 just after the 12th of october. you with our team. now we're across another sex scandal after the break. but his main lines of defense is which is the criminal. i'm just putting his hands over his eyes and shouting, la la la la la, la la, was wide spread, consternation off to police abruptly drop, but investigation into the alleged abuse of a teenage girl by police. andrew, still none of the hello. the pro continues, of course in the us were across it and so much more. ah

ah ah oh, driven by dreamer shaped bankers are those with

theirs sinks. we dare to ask oh, hi, get and child abuse allegations a billionaire sex trafficking ring. you had a course that interview britton's prince. andrew certainly been for the mill of light, but this seems to be little sympathy for his plight at the moment and wide spread consternation at his case being dropped now by authorities of the u. k. volleyball cur, explains the hapless prince andrew. the duke of york, the queen's 2nd son, and the subject of the biggest car crash interview in living memory. it's almost a mental health issue to some extent for me under maybe about to get away with it in a way that early a royal can. he stands accused of having force sex with

a girl called virginia roberts, now jew frey, who was 17, back in 2001 i was traffic by suicide pito. jeffrey epstein, one of andres main lines of defense, is i have no recollection of information this lady number, which is the equivalent. i'm just putting his hands over his eyes and shouting, la, la, la, la, la, la la, even this didn't joke his memory a picture of him with his arm. * around you fray. he claims it's vague, but then again, he also claims it was almost impossible for me just to sweat many people with eyes suggest that the evidence against andrew is pretty compelling. but fortunately for him not compelling enough for london's metropolitan police which is dropping its investigation, the metropolitan police taking no further action following

a review into sexual abuse allocation surrounding prince andrew and jeffrey epstein . having reviewed the claims made by ju fray in a civil lawsuit in america and having questioned her in australia, the mat says it's gonna let this one go mad. police chief crested and dick said this about randy andy, back in august to see about the law. no one is above the law to phrase u. s. lawyer, sigrid mccauley is not happy. she says that the match should reopen its investigation into prince andrew given the clear and compelling evidence against him on standby. it statement that no one is above the law, telling me though andrews own family appeared to be less convinced than the corpse . over the weekend, it was reported that prince william, who's a 2nd in line to the throne, has made it clear that his dodgy uncle allegedly should never be allowed to return to public life. again. prince andrew is right now,

bunkering down at the queen scottish residence. that's where i am, is been hanging out at mummies car. so avoiding the legal papers that accuse him of abusing ju for a while at the home of the 3rd person in that now notorious photograph jolaine maxwell, and as well as it properties belonging to jeffrey epstein, as we all know, epstein is conveniently dead. but maxwell, whose epstein ex girlfriend, is set to go on trial in new york next month, accused of sex trafficking, epstein just like andrew. she's pleading allison. and either way, this is going to be a blockbuster, and you better stay in the queen's castle and pull up the drawbridge and may be no more interviews. prince andrew slipped back from all royal duties in 2019 to stop what he called disruption to the royal family. the prince has given an alibi for at least one of the alleged encounter, saying that he was in a restaurant outside london at that time. forward, british home offers minister norma baker's dismiss speculation over the palace

could be pressured, the police to drop the case. and i don't believe that they would dismiss the case because prince andrew, prince andrew. i think they're more got more intense than that. but i think that as i say, the key point is that the metropolitan police police commissioner made the comment in the release of scotland yard. but it wasn't prod predominantly a matter of british jurisdiction because the allegations relate predominantly to what happened on united states soil and the case going to the courts in america. so i think that may have taken a pragmatic view that as best left the to the states to take this matter forward. yes, so, i mean, he's innocent until proven guilty. we're going to an american talk case. so we'll see what that, what that produces. of course, the problem with royal families isn't they are not. stackable. politicians are faculty members are all family punch. and that's the love of the problem. with

the diplomatic spat spring between algeria and france with president a boon, demanding total respect from paris is countries. former colonial master relations between the 2 remains strained of comments recently by the french president and new visa restrictions. we can't act like nothing happened. and our ambassador will only return to paris when france shows total respect for the oh, jerry and state. let me give you more back story. aside from recalling and some pastor, algeria is also banned french military plains from its air space. now these moves come off to remarks by president mc crohn, in which he claimed the former colonies ruled by a political military system, which she went on to say is full of hatred towards france. mcroy even reportedly asked if algeria existed before french colonization of paris is reduced. it's allocation of a visas for algerians. moroccans and tunis ins accusing his former colonies of not

doing enough to allow immigrants to return. historian ortho gerald horn told us that he thinks the motive, though behind president microns actions, there are more to do with french elections than algeria. mr. malone is facing a very difficult reelection campaign. a mr. chrome feels that he has to step up the rhetoric against algiers. the french economy is heavily dependent upon exploitation of north africans, so in addition to the full paw with regard to circumventing a bilateral process concerning vsa, allocation of france is also hampering its economy. mister mer crone is engaging in a bit of cynicism when he brings up the spurious claims about how algeria supposedly hates france. and i should also add that given the horrors inflicted upon algeria during the decades of colonial occupation from 1830 to 1962, algeria might have good reason to despise paris,

or find so much more from rested. i'll see though, comrade of a socially this is a check it out if you get a minute. meantime, thanks. check in with us. my name is kevin o in for me and the team of a super rest of this tuesday. with l look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence at that point obviously is to great trust, rather than fear with take on various job with artificial intelligence. real, somebody with a robot must protect his own existence with

when i see black america, i see part of myself. i was growing like american spoke to me with what a straight it did, not. those who say black lives matter is a movement we are importing from america. know nothing of who we are. i lived in a world where white lodge mattered. and i was not wide like missing and i wasn't known from black america. i learned how to speak back to whitefish aboriginal people here on your every day. we are out with system. now with the police were out with 2 states. i'm scared that more children are going to grow up in the country that think says no racism,

but they're more likely to end up in the criminal justice and then there are other fellow friends in daycare. ah ah, what do i see your brother now but let us stay at like what kind of cynthia atkinson you wanted to see? what still with me, glove would like to bring your for fewer documents written with the church in proponents particular identity protection that i wasn't born bridget, what i should like say it the what else is the most basic okay ah

what do i see where you get a corporate in many of the national and local nationalist border near the back st. bezels cathedral is always the center of attention. but of course it's seen in a special way by artists. it never looks the same with ever changing lighting and many different angles. so it offers endless creative opportunities, but it's not just the artist to a drawn to the cathedral, a from politicians, to athlete and movie stars, to musicals. does it seems that every big name in the world has been here. i know, say, oh moscow. what on a little bit in their thoughts got what i think not poignant. barbara, they helped me they. i don't know it's well player get.