what is true was his face ah, in the world corrupted, you need to descend, ah, join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah, ah, you k power plant one slaughtered as super green turns out to be the country's biggest carbon dioxide culprit. and i made a blistering energy crisis in the country. twitter tests a new feature and a bid to make conversations more healthy by warning users that things could get intense or heated. we put the plan up for debate. they long ago lost control of their product. this is just another laughable way that they're yelling in the breeze curl, horse that has long ago left the bar. they can kick you off, they can put up signs, they can throw pumpkins at you,

it's their law and they own it. they pay for it. and the french government summons the country's top catholic bishop, over confessional secrets that prevent reporting of admissions of child sex abuse. ah, it's 2 p. m and a beautiful autumn day here in the russian capital, you're watching our t international. i'm your host donald quarter. welcome. the british energy crisis is deepening with warnings that there could be even more gas price hikes. industries are feeling the pinch and are saying that they could go bust the question now is, are they ready to suspend their environmental aspirations at least for the time being because it's been revealed that a power plant and the u. k. ones hailed as super green has turned out to be the country's biggest c o 2 emitter. the scale of wood burning by tracks each year

means the power station is one of the top 5 and mrs. the particulate matter and pollution in europe, putting it in the same company as some of europe's worst coal power plants. greener kina renewable energy is what the well this calling fall back with an energy crisis looming in europe this winter. there's a rush to stop power fossil fuels, a move that will perish, carbon dioxide emissions are far from where policy makers want it to be. and this power plant in drax, in the north of england, claims to be the onset to the die. lemme by switching to been biomass or would rather than coal, the blind claims of emissions from binding wood and negated by the growth of new trees, soaking up carbon again, and replacing those harvested for burning sounds good, right? i don't know how they prove it and establish this carbon neutral. but if it is great, anything will make seattle clean is going to be better now. yeah, that's a good thing. i'd say. if you could say job for yourself to completely get

a cop in your to it it. hello sheila cried a piece of where to go. yes, i mean as far as i can see or tell that to haven't beaten it, anything different out to it. but according to a report, the power station is far from green, and it's actually the country's biggest emitter of carbon pollution. one, still it's the 3rd dirtiest in europe, in fact. and dr. is the only biomass facility to rank in the contents plan of c o 2 emitted, today you have it while selling itself as carbon neutral learning would actually bounces out more emissions and from burning coal, you to its lower energy density than fossil fuels would, has to be burned in higher volumes to produce the same amount of energy, but in no attempt to clear the air, drax responded to the claim, saying the figures of false figures are inaccurate and completely at all. it's with what the world's leading climate. scientists at the unit into governmental panel on

climate change say the both sustainable bio mass been crucial to deliver in global climate targets. despite the figures the site still managed to attract more than 800000000 pounds, an u. k. government subsidies. that's a 2000000 pounds every single day in 2020 alone because of course, briar energy production reflects well on the government's climate record. but all of this is left the locals at boiling point shock and alienate to be for control 1000000. yeah, that's not very good. if that's true, that is of worry. yeah that's, that's not good road, not very good at to lena nod robert, go to some to go up by a lie to the community. more than anything can live around there to build up a bit better. it bad for the children and bring blah more than oh wow. then go to a bigger power station law. so despite the neutral a negative pledges, in this case buyer energy seems to be failing to protect the planets. in fact,

it seems to be making matters worse. the government is trying to reduce carbon dioxide side subsidizing something that is hugely, a covering carbon dioxide seems to be a very strange way of spending government money. it's green when it wants to be positive in the new cycle, but it's not green. when he looks at the need to ensure that we have fuel security . it's because it's an ideology. they've almost got to the stage where it becomes a religion. for them, nothing matters more than ensuring that we remove carbon dioxide and move to the green agenda. of course, for many of them, there will be a financial benefit. some of them will sit on boards of directors of the new green companies. others will be part of the non governmental organizations that receive funding from the european union and other countries that also support the green agenda. now on to the realm of online discussions,

twitter thinks it's got an answer for when conversations get rowdy and in its opinion offensive, it's trying out a new feature that warns users entering an online chat that it could get quite heated. although some content flagged in the trial run has left users a bit confused. oh, whoa. there are intense conversation about the weather, bro. seriously, this is the lamest one yet. to return. what's intense about this conversation? come believe this is happening on it under intense conversations. dear to it's a, i'm a generation x sir, is going to take more than an intense conversation to bother me. so how does it work? if twitter spots a chat threat with opposing views being debated, and someone wants to join in a message pops up saying heads up, conversations like this can be intense. it is still not clear whether or not

twitter is scanning for contentious subject matter or the actual content of a conversation. but cola collin bray discussed it with a panel of experts. this sound like a noble idea that is doomed to fail because if it's moderated by humans, it's open to claims of subjectivity. if it's algorithms, well, we'll know how they can't really understand the nuances of language and discussion kind of work. no, no is the very simple answer there and twitter itself has no idea how to moderate it and winds up getting the vast brunt of some of the most insane arguments that bubble up on that site. so they long ago lost control of their product. this is just another laughable way that they're yelling into the breeze for a horse that has long ago left the bard. this is no goose mistake. twitter is not fumbling the ball. they are not somehow incapable of managing their audience. it is going exactly as plan. imagine the idea when you watch television or anywhere the

world did you get a disclaimer? the following contains lipstick. children be advised, do you want to watch it? yes, you do. the 2nd, they put up a warning saying whatever you do, don't touch that. dia, whatever you do, don't push the red button. i'm going to be the 1st in line along with millions of others to push the red button. this is the perfect brand new bait hook in the cheek off we go. is there a danger that there are certain people, certain company, certain subjects that can a full file be judged before any auto bodies even taken place? absolutely, they, this is already algorithmically put to the top of the queue. it's already algorithmically fed to everybody because there is at the base level, no difference between intense content and profitable content. the content that people want to engage with that stay on the site longer, and therefore give twitter more opportunity to serve ads in between everything else

. it would be intellectually honest for us to remember that it is a free platform like facebook, a free platform. they make all the money you get to play on their front yard. they on the lawn, they can kick you off. they could put up signs, they can throw pumpkins at you, it's their lawn, they own it, they pay for it. we just go crazy on it. so pretending like a phone call where you have an implied, a privacy interaction is folly. the fact is, we're guests. there at somebody else's dinner table and they keep throwing hand grenades and the soup a know that the more engaged when you get the more rancor and the more engage when you get the more ads. but also you get more of a discourse on why there shouldn't be rancor. so twitter is, is to me the most incompetent of, of the people doing it because they are the most scared of their audience. but then again, if i worked at twitter, i'd probably be the most scared of my audience duke. when the free speech advocates

like this, let's face it. they can be the noisy or end of the digital conversation currently. because no one's getting bad. no one's getting thrown off the conversation is still allowed to happen. that's a good thing, isn't it? well, in my opinion, it is what's offensive to you is not offensive to me. and who's to say what is offensive. so that's why it's again, again, it's private property. so we do have these issues and problems. think of the beauty though. if you're a politician, you can do horrible things. you can stand up and say, i'm going to defend little timmy was not even born yet. for something that may offend it, and i'm to squelch conversation to put a warning flags and all that. meanwhile, what they physically do, or legislative lead do or do it. policy is truly offensive and there's no warning for that. it just happens. and then we all get caught facebook is feeling the pressure after ideas swirl in congress to hold the platform liable for content

posted there. we unpack some of this for you. enjoy your freedom of speech on social media. well, it sounds like it's about to change. the facebook was a blow, a has a plan on how to fix the evil in the harmful system. a plan that may destroy the internet as we know it. and she presented it fucking the senate. i strongly encourage reforming section 230. what is section 230, and why is it so important to provide immunity from liability to website platforms? for instance, it doesn't allow anybody to serve facebook for any content created bytes uses mock zuckerberg himself is far from a moral beacon. facebook was widely criticized for an antique and safety bias in recent years. facebook had purposely and routinely suppressed conservative stories disadvantaging, conservative content century conservative bloggers blocking and centering religious and conservative political content for the platform was never moderated from the outside. from any guys on capitol hill that comp setting, the new

a superstar whistleblower has found a perfect solution. user generated content, something that companies have less control over their a 100 percent control over their algorithms. algorithms i based mechanisms which determine how your facebook feed looks. what post you see 1st thing in the morning, a picture of your friends, newborn baby, a viral cat video. oh and offensive political mean. right now the algorithms are controlled by facebook and the operating principles of far from transparent. the company has long drawn criticism for not sharing many details on how the content is prioritized. these technological systems are walled off air, very complicated. they have put their astronomical prophets before people, money driven decision making, shaving, you'll fade so one fac, how about political? it algorithm is controlled by the u. s. government much better. what a great way to spread american values or the majority party bias to the 1st quarter

of the, of the people in bob way, can't wait to appreciate it with the proposed governmental body directly in charge of facebook algorithms. that would be no constraints. facebook seems to be eager to cooperate with the authorities. instead of expecting the industry to make societal decisions that belong to legislators, it is time for congress to act. the current algorithms are definitely far from perfect, but i bet will miss them. what's the gilman guessing charge? imagine what a you, a sense of the social media would look like. videos of a messy afghanistan withdrawal. definitely not interesting. and to graphic. don't show it to anybody. press the button stumbles on the steps. no, no, no, that's just defensive and digest your friends graduation bridges. ok. but as i have a look at the gender neutral axis and the new website to read the movie, i am your fabulous god mobile. no more inconvenient me was and bided an old man

drinks. and he counted pre approved by the us government. well, if that's what happens to social media, maybe we'll find these thought living in the real world. a debate over confessional, secrecy is raging and france as the country's top bishop says, it prevents the church from disclosing admissions of child sex. abuse comes after a report that revealed over 300000 children were abused within the french catholic church, over the past 70 years. the bishop is set to discuss the issue with the countries interior minister today, and charlotte davinsky. as the details from paris, france is top bishop is getting ready for a grilling by the french government, often suggesting that priests should not go to the police after they've heard a confession west. but he says that they have sexually abused a child. he made these remarks in the aftermath of that explosive report that was

released by the saw of a commission law suite. that report found that at least $330000.00 children had been abused over a period of 70 years. and that 2 thirds of the victims were those who had been victimized by the priests themselves in the church. that 80 percent of the cases were boys aged between 10 and 13 years old. and that not only did the church do anything to prevent what was happening, but it also failed to report it. that's not only angered the french government, but it angered people here in paris, but much collectively i believed that they should systematically denounce it. they are responsible for they press so they must train them. isn't they in contact with the public so they have to check that everything is going well. the needs of face up to the responsibility and take responsibility is just crazy. may i'd?

yeah, i don't. i don't know how it continues to carry out already, don't mazama did on this, we're thinking this a bassetti. it took me away from the face to day. i no longer wanna turn to church because of that. there was credibility. they lose their divine message. it's an acceptable to date is an acceptable with all that we now know. no, it's impossible. now this thinks he a really documented, so act, thou know, to continue to hide behind the law. religion. now while senior members of the catholic church in france and the vatican themselves, the pope have expressed shame about the contents that were revealed by the silver commission for many. this is just another one. too many reports showing the abuse it's been taking place in the catholic church for decades, potentially even centuries. and for one, vic, him here in france. she's spoken to us at our tea. he says that what eric do noble

for his said. it shows that there is a serious problem within the french catholic church. true bolcko's hillary led him will. i think that this is the demonstration. once again, the incomprehension and the out of touch dimension of these men of the church, they have cut themselves off from society and the realities of life. and this has led them to be out of control when one is capable of committing so many crimes. when one is capable of carrying out such a work of death than its concealment, it does indeed leave an aroma of crime against humanity which raises questions which raises serious questions. what is clear is that the saw of a commission support is exclusive as it was, was perhaps meant to be the road for a reparations for the church to repairing its image after letting people know about these crimes. in reality, what it seems to be doing is undoing the church completely. you're watching r t international just after the break, another sex scandal. boundary main lines of defense is i have no

recollection of information was lady number also, which is the equivalent of just putting his hands over his eyes and shouting, la la la la la la, la, and wide spread consternation after the police abruptly drop an investigation into the alleged abuse of a teenage girl by prince andrew, but he is still not off the hook as the prob continues in the united states. lou ah, ah, is you'll media a reflection of reality? in the world transformed? what will make you feel safer?

isolation for community. are you going the right way? or are you being that some with what is true? wharf is great. in the world corrupted, you need to descend. ah, so join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah, ah, chinese banks are not countable lending against entrepreneurs necessarily. they only wanna blend against real estate speculation. so this was created the biggest real estate bubble in history. that's now collapsing. ah, welcome back to the program. now child abuse allegations,

a billionaire sex trafficking ring, and of course, that interview the you case. prince andrew has certainly been through the mill, but there seems to be little sympathy for his plight and widespread shock at his case being dropped by british authority. says polly boy, co explains a hapless prince andrew. the duke of york, the queen's 2nd son on the subject of the biggest call crash interview in living memory. it's almost a mental health issue to some extent for me under maybe about to get away with it. in a way that early a royal can, he stands accused of having forced sex with a girl called virginia roberts, now g frey, who was 17, back in 2001 i was traffic by suicide in p day. jeffrey epstein, one of andres main lines of defense, is i have no a miss lloyd manuel sort of which is the equivalent. i'm just putting his hands

over his eyes and shouting, la la la la, la, la la. even this didn't joke his memory a picture of him with his arm. * around you fray, he claims it's fake, but then again, he also claims it was almost impossible for me to, to sweat many people with eyes suggest that the evidence against andrew is pretty compelling. but fortunately for him not compelling enough for london's metropolitan police which is dropping it's investigation, the metropolitan police taking no further action following a review into sexual abuse allegations surrounding prince andrew and jeffrey epstein. having reviewed the claims made by ju fray in a civil lawsuit in america and having questioned her in australia, the mat says it's gonna let this one go. mac police chief crested, and dick said this about randy andy, back in august to see about the move. no one is above the law to phrase

u. s. lawyers sacred. mccauley is not happy. she says that the match should reopen its investigation into prince andrew, given the clear and compelling evidence against him on stand by its statement that no one is above the law. telling me, though andrews own family appeared to be less convinced than the corpse over the weekend. it was reported that prince william, who's a 2nd in line to the throne, has made it clear that his dodgy uncle allegedly should never be allowed to return to public life. again. prince andrew is right now, bunkering down at the queen scottish residence. that's right. andrews been hanging out at mummies, causal avoiding the legal papers that accused him of abusing due for a while at the home of the 3rd person and not now notorious photograph jolaine maxwell. and as well as properties. hey, jesse epstein, as we all know at seen is convenient a dad. but maxwell is actually in the ex girlfriend is set to go on trial in new

york next month. he's as sex trafficking, epstein just like on j. she's pleading innocent. and either way, this is going to be a blockbuster, and you better stay in the queen's castle and pull up the drawbridge and maybe no more into these. a prince. andrew stepped back from his royal duties in 2019 to stop what he called disruption to the royal family. the prince has given an alibi for at least one of his alleged encounters, saying he was at a restaurant outside london at the time to be host and former british politician. george galloway says the prince is having a hard time trying to convince the public of his innocence. it is possible that these allegations have no substance but the performance of prince andrew, who seemed to have no conception of how his body language and his language

would play in public opinion. it turns out to be probably the most catastrophic interview ever given by a senior member in the british state. it not only did it not convince anyone of his innocence, it gave rise to our raft dog jukes, and in so ruble dre across the land. on the cross of aligns to, undoubtedly the metropolitan police abandoned the prospect of further action in this case without even talking to the victim or alleged victim herself. you would have thought the normal thing would be to send a couple of officers out to the united states to interview her, at least, to go through the motions. all fellner said justice, but that didn't happen. so it seems all they did was read the testimony way,

a decent number of weeks and then conclude that there were no grounds for any further action on the case. no one will question this. no one effectively can question this decision, but it's not over yet. now another news, a diplomatic spat is brewing between algeria and france with president to boon demanding total respect from paris. his country's former colonial master relations between the 2 remained strained over comments by the french president and new visa restrictions. we can't act like nothing happened and are impossible, only returned to paris when friends shows total respect for the o. g reinstate. aside from recalling its ambassador al guerria has also banned french military plains from its airspace. the move comes after remarks by president micron in which he claimed the former colony is ruled by

a political military system full of hatred towards france. micron even reportedly asked if algeria existed before french colon the colonization. on top of that, paris has reduced its allocation of visas for algerians. moroccans and 2 nations accusing its former colonies of not doing enough to allow illegal immigrants to return. historian and author gerald horn thinks that the motive behind for president microns actions has more to do with french elections than algeria itself . mr. mccall is facing a very difficult reelection campaign, or mr. mc chrome feels that he has to step up the rhetoric against algiers. the french economy is heavily dependent upon exploitation of north africans. so in addition to the full paw with regard to circumventing a bilateral process concerning visa, allocation of france is also hampering its economy. mister mic crone is engaging in

a bit of cynicism when he brings up these spurious claims about how algy area supposedly hates france. and i should also air that given the horrors inflicted upon algeria during the decades of colonial occupation from 1830 to 1962, algeria might have good reason to despise paris, french hospital worker who was suspended for refusing to get vaccinated against cove. it has taken her employer to court over the dismissal since compelling and backward household, that vaccination is also mandatory for remote work. the h r department told me that i think it's unfair because when it's profitable, they call me when working here and we were always on the spot. and now they're saying you can go home, you can't work. there won't be a salary until you get vaccinated. i always got vaccinated and followed the vaccination scheme like everyone else because i'm a medical worker. i used to be

a nurse and now i work in the hospital administration. so i got all the vaccinations according to the mandatory inoculation scheme, but i'm not confident in the college job because not enough time has passed and i don't think i'm the only one felicia today. i want to return to my position, observing all the necessary measures of social distancing and hygiene as we did before by since 2019 who have been working in masks and using protective equipment that you and we were allowed to work. the french government had made it mandatory for health workers to get vaccinated by mid september. a measure taken as covert cases were on the rise with authority saying that the mass inoculation drive was the only way to restore normal life to the country. but the caseload has declined in recent months, and president micron has still rejected complaints saying health workers shouldn't have the right to choose your pedal and yet, oh couldn't the birth didn't exist to so no freedom exists without duty. the freedom where i owe nothing to any one does not exists his affliction. a lie,

people tell themselves in my freedom only and where the freedom of the other begins them. but above all, it is based on a sense of reciprocal duty. what does your freedom worth if you say to me, i don't want to be vaccinated, but if to morrow you infect your father that he put it on film the glove was at e v. i said to peter, now we also got a reaction from the suspended health workers lawyer who is sure that suspending people without pay in this situation is illegal. go whoever you, little worked according to the law. these people are mans to face paid suspension from work. but we have the extraordinary situation where people who haven't made any mistakes are suspended without pay. so it's a death sentence. you have to call it as it is. these are old neary people. they have no country houses. these are old, the re, people who count their last coins at the end of the month to see if they have enough for food. that's what shows me. thanks for watching our to international. we'll be back with more news and just about 30 minutes. so see, see that ah

ah ah ah ah ah ah.