ah, with patients already forced to q for hours to get into hospitals in the u. k. paramedics, born on until an unprecedented crisis facing the ambulance service. that's as the armies put on standby to help. we honestly don't have to diagnose the government's plans until the health service around 5.7 and bug and y e u ministers raised their disagreements of how to and the crisis is the pro sparks have global drivers. we should be very careful before interfering in the design of internal energy markets. these will not be remedied to mitigate the current rising energy prices linked to fossil fuels markets. so the 9 countries said they are against radical reforms. instead, they support a fast renewable rollout and integration of the you electricity market. and that's

not the only hurdle facing block members. several you countries, including france and slovenia, whose infrastructure minutes that chad tuesdays imagines that energy meeting express support will the use of nuclear power. however, that very issue has previously led to in fighting among states, also is ashanti davinsky picks up the story the energy crisis combined with you countries trying to meet call when you try to targets. bodes well the francis favorite form of power nuclear in brussels. the commission president hit the red button, we need a stable source, nuclear and during the transition of course, natural gas. and this is why, as we've already stated as a commission in april, we will come forward with our taxonomy proposal. member states have been fatally divided over nuclear power. the commission chief herself previously branded it as

dangerous and the likes of austria, germany in spain, all local opponents. who were disconcerted to learn that in the opinion of the joint research center, there were no indication that the high risk technology that is nuclear power is more damaging to human health and to the environment than other forms of energy generation, such as wind and solar energy nuclear power, however, is a high risk technology in germany. people are concerned by the european commissions change of hot galvan, if i don't believe in nuclear power, it has been proven to be the most dangerous and expensive form of energy production . so at home graph, nuclear power is actually not the best for the future. now their energy sources should come 1st to in block and long term. we should move away from both fossil fuels, a nuclear energy towards natural sustainable generated power. plus my direct harry

frog's. nuclear power is far better. received. president mack on has just unveiled plans to build new nuclear plants. he's one of several you leaders that have been pushing the idea that nuclear is a green investment. the country's grid operate to r t e also insist that nuclear is essential to the energy portfolio. building new nuclear reactors is economically viable, especially as it makes it possible to maintain a fleet of around 40 gigawatts in 2050. but that is not an argument that's accepted by environmental organizations. nuclear power is incredibly expensive, hazardous and slow to built. building new nuclear reactors won't happen overnight in the you. meaning that this won't be a source of power to draw from, as the energy crisis bites this winter, and also possibly into next year. what you're really needs is the solution right now, and yet it's resisting the answer that many think is obvious. ask

a neighbor for help in this scenario, that's russia, which has plenty of gas to pump, overt during this pinch. some e u leaders know which way the wind is blowing, and of even asked the commission to rethink it, freeze on russia. forget about ever become an independent from russia. this will never happen. there's also concern that this shift towards nuclear power being a form of green energy is the result of powerful lobbyists. and this desperate is the, you seems to want to forego any relationship with russia over gas shipping to nuclear won't change the need for that relationship with moscow. not only do some elements, so the essential for nuclear vision come from russia. the country has also been helping france to process its nuclear waste. whichever way you look at it, the e. u and its energy needs look sec to remain tightly linked to moscow. i know

that we must rely on russian gas. no problem about that is there, maybe they would prefer to have energy coming from the united states, but we need outside sources. russia has always proposed long term contracts, the government. so the governments for the moment, they don't really complain about the small prices of gas that are so i, they are my but they have long term delivery plans with a good price. so they are not affected. it's only, you know, specifics only the last cubic meter. that's so expensive. so i think really everything will be solved by spring. nuclear energy will be all the list all the while degree taxonomy to use one of the crate wording that european commission is used, which is excellent, and gas from russia will be fine to be accepted as the best solution we are. we are

neighbors, and we must rely on russian gas. no problem. it's not a calendar program, british and peas guys, thanks the divan cold. that was the nature withdrawal form again, this time during an evidence session, slimy what? one of them called schoolboy errors, known that after the break oh, when i was showing wrong, when i just don't know. i mean you world, yes to see how this thing becomes the advocate and engagement equals betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground.

this picture tells a 1000 words and 1000 episodes a kaiser where are continue. this is the rosetta stone of me and kaiser report understanding this me what stacy wearing a crime. i don't know if you've seen the close up or not, but that stacy wearing a crown in front of a burning building. this is the king name of all means. this is the construct. think all you need to know about our modern life in me. ah, ah, this is on see international welcome back. british and peace have conducted a post mortem on the nato church withdrawal from afghanistan during the evidence

session. basic mistakes were identified was only one option that was withdraw. didn't worry you when it said it was made on a serious issue like this, there appears to be not across government approach to this in terms of joined up approach. seems to be some variance here in the titles. inevitably, there were some very difficult questions pointed to the defense secretary from the committee who's very job is to hold foreign policy to account. and this committee is primarily really angry because so far the government has refused to launch a full scale inquiry into the withdrawal of africa based on over the summer. and so the committee of almost taken upon themselves to know this many inquiry into the evacuation. the tone today really from m p. 's was to felt really one on the one how they feel like the entire episode was a monumental failure in terms of foreign policy, but also

a real let down moment for the moral obligations of the afghan people as well. now it all kicked off surrounding the p steel that was struck with the tale on which ben wall is the defense. secretary basically shocked responsibility for the united kingdom's role in the withdrawal decision. if you don't deliver ammunition to the afghan forces and they run out of bullets, that's when they're going to drop their guns, get rid of a uniforms and go home because they will see the winds of change once again sweeping across afghanistan. so it's a critical school boy era that was made while much of the session also focused on the intelligence failures. of course, you remember back in the summer, then foreign secretary dominic rob appeared to be on holiday sunbathing, while carpool fell so many questions about whether the intelligence was wrong or whether or not it was misread. and how on us many key play is in all of this was simply no way to be seen. while the defense secretary,

much like many ministers and military experts full back on that argument. how over the law, 20 years, the counter terrorism effort actually prevented groups like al qaeda from launching and re any terrorist attacks from within afghanistan and the u. k. a hawk used disbanded the group in its entirety. but considering the taliban now have taken over the region, it almost seems redundant. however, ben wallace did admit that the big picture, the big a political picture in terms of its campaign didn't walk. i don't, i don't think we were defeated nature with a to enable that. he camp political resolution a political campaign. and i think that is what failed. we were the enabler, the military with their to put in place the security environment in order to try and deliver that. when that was withdrawn. that when you find out whether your political campaign has worked and i think what we discovered, it didn't work right now. it's clear to say that people, one answers,

and many people are asking what went wrong, and why did the united kingdom leave afghanistan, how on earth the telephone took over so quickly? plus, of course, the key issue that one and a half 1000 people ask on interpreters included that are eligible to be relocated here in the united kingdom, a still stuck in the region. plus, interestingly, around 30 british citizens are too stuck in the region. they're accusing at the united kingdom of totally abandoning them. we met to simply record this message in the hope that someone out there will hear a voice and take action to rescue us and our families. but as the final point than the chairman of the committee to buy is elwoods speaking auster, that quite long recession. he said the group are only just as scratching the surface to day. and they'll be many more uncomfortable moments. full members of parliament that actually were key players in the withdrawal of afghanistan,

written secret, sad at south storing the most classified documents on amazon. the u. s. company has reportedly landed a lucrative contract with government communications headquarters. am i 5 and my 6 said to use that cloud system? according to report, the contract will allow spine to shy information more easily from abroad and allow from greater integration of a amazon luc set to land to 1000000000 pounds over the next 10 years. in the d, u, the u. k and amazon have so far, refused to comment, was spoke with former m. i 5 intelligence officer, and shawn, who thinks it imposes on the case over in tape. i find it astonishing that the most secret national security information contained by m i 5 and 6, and g t h king can be outsourced to a private corporation based within another nation. faith. i mean, they've always, always made such a huge issue of every bit of information. they got to keep themselves. they've got

very laws to protect information again with a blank for example, like the official secret. and yet now they just handing over all this information to a foreign corporation. it does not make sense. it's just an out sourcing of british national sovereignty that is going on here. and everyone would say, well, alex america, there are friends. but we've seen time and time again over the last 20 years, at least when the warrant. terrorist started how they can manipulate an abuse intelligence behind the scenes and also have hon. let intelligence can be in this aspect when it comes to national security and high grade intelligence and protecting agent lives and ongoing operations. to out forces information to a foreign company. i just find an absolute cooling. emitted push for i transition to clean energy burden is planning cash incentives to help fountains go green, but the 5000 pound grant and fail to encourage people to install. he'll hate pumps still threatens to leave brits out of pocket. so the grant,

as part of the burdens pushed to phase out of gas boilers, but a cheap hate pump reportedly called just under $9000.00 pounds of translation, which is much more than a basic boiler because it isn't expected to be offset by cheap monthly bills, either since heat pumps use electricity, which costs more than gas, so for some already trench financially, swapping out the boiler is not viable. whereas somebody by myself retired or where are they going? over 7000 pounds. but it's going to cost me 40 percent more. you're going to be a $5000.00 pound grown to install. the basic cost is $12000.00 and the long basically it's going to cost more. even if i reinstall for free, your electric field county would still increase. so i don't think anybody's going

to get a want them think of the cost, the ridiculous adamant about 85 percent of u. k. homes. i hate to buy gas boilers. and that could for a good that counts for a good chunk of the countries. carbon emissions, but hopes of driving that percentage down will rest unconvincing. critics who fear hate pumps has not been properly full through pounds. just for the normal english army can not make calls for rather than the lazy not reliable i built a house years ago. and i am full to the house from suite house came with the insulation of me, missing the clothes, walls and ceiling and the roof virtually hated itself. and that way it works. but with an english house from u. k. house,

that's just not possible. you have to rebuild all the house, so the government doesn't build out, houses, properties envelop is filled. that house is the only way that they are going to stop building those sort of files. it would be if it was the low price. sanchez in the us show no sign of using anytime soon. the secretary of the treasury has said inflation rates are likely to remain at near decade heights until at least the 2nd half of next year. so give you an idea of how that paying people in the pocket. the prices of used cars and stakes have shown up by more than 20 percent. and if you won't eggs with those stakes, you will pay 13 percent more for them compared to the beginning of this year. while furniture and bedding are by double digit percentage points as well. us official said the inflation rate is way above full costs. the comma charge to the economy has cause disruptions that we will be working through over the next year. and of

course, americans haven't seen inflation like we have experience in a long time. and it's not just the us has been hit hard the tree economists for the international monetary fund wound inflationary pressures around the globe will remain at least until the middle of 2022 baths, june part to disruption to supply trains during the pandemic. and in the u. k, is the poorest off here to be the hardest haves. the opposition labor party claim those left well of a paying up to 50 percent known and inter bills compared to wealthy families. max kinds a host of the kaiser report hale and he believes the money printing policies a washington in london are only adding fuel to the fire. the u. s. is similar to these other countries and that they're all coordinating their central bank policies . and they are all living in this dream world where you can print money forever and have no consequences. when you print trillions and trillions of dollars, it ends up increasing prices. the purchasing power of this money is going to

decrease, so everything will cost more if you're using fee money. this is an experiment that goes back to 1971 when the world went on. if the money standard, and now for 40 years, we've been living in this experiment. and now in 2020 wanted the experiment is blowing up on our faces. purchasing power for fee money is going down. that means that prices for stop are going to go up. and now people are getting hurt by it. so now the money printing is just going directly into the cpi, it's going directly into price increases. and once the inflation genie is out of the bottle, there's no way to put it back in expectations are running high. so this is the beginning of a secular inflationary. moved. the only way to stop it is to raise interest rates down ross, or they're actually raising interest rates. they're doing the right thing. but in the united states, in great britain, they're not raising interest rates. as a matter of fact, they believe that the way to fight this would be the lower rates and to make more money available. so they're actually throwing gasoline on the fire if they were to

raise rates, even a quarter of a percentage point, they were throw the entire leveraged economy of the u. k. and britain into complete parallels ation. so they've really put themselves in an untenable position. and i think we're going to see a huge economic dislocation. this is the beginning of a secular inflationary move that's going to cause tremendous damage. and that's the news on our international. the silent join me for more about said that it's time of next to it's the crosstalk. ah, with ah

oh oh yeah, it has to be rash to be able to afford enzyme and find the luxury that for sure. despite having the most expensive health care system in the world, we have poor life expectancy. we have higher infant mortality. we have more deaths from treatable causes. so americans are suffering every day from it. it says if these people don't count i saw how they can choose their customers and dumped the sick so also

a can satisfy their wall street investors. no parents should have to see what i saw. so if you're denying payment for someone's care, your make life and death decision and determine to get to live and who dies.