[000:00:00;00] a president putin pledges to russia will be carbon neutral, no later than 2060 in a message to delegate. so the humans climate summit in scotland as the west pushes for action and top $26.00. we look at how their ambitious plans might hurt nations dependent on fossil fuels. and then h. s. executive warms that mandatory vaccines for britain's health care staff could spark and accidents of workers and put lives at risk and france delays its retaliatory measures against the u. k. in a dispute, over fishing rights of the britain threatens legal action.

ah, hello, good, happy with it. say to the evening here in moscow. my name is colleen bray. welcome to world news from arte international. first, then the humans climate summit gone down to business in scotland with president putin endorsing russia's commitment to becoming a carbon neutral economy. no later than 2060 in support of global conservation efforts. as this is alicia, having set the task of building a carbon neutral economy here no later than 2060 russia is also relying on the unique resources of our forest ecosystems. and there are significant potential for absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen. what will will indeed, our country has about 20 percent of all the world's forest areas. it's nancy thing, or india, which is one of the world's biggest polluters, has also set a target for becoming carbon neutral. the year 2017, missing the summit goal by 2 decades. the indian prime ministers also asked for more money to be doled out to developing countries for their transition to cleaner

energy. saskia taylor next looks at how complying with emission goals may not be that simple for nations heavily dependent on fossil fuels. oh, $26.00 his hair and it's going to save us from doomsday. i will $100.00 wild need is a setting out their goals for the future and that big ones, stop deforestation, switch to renewables, 0 emissions an ohio electric nasty thing nature like a toilet we are digging out, own grapes. humanity has long since run down the clock on climate change. it's one minute to midnight on that doomsday clock and we need to act. non client change is already ravaged oral. we only have a brief window left for us to raise your visions to raised me to task. sounds great. the question is, who pay the biggest price for all these politicians patches?

it's easy for both chad and co to promised to turn off the light when they leave a room. but for others half way around the world, saying no to fossil fuels is a luxury. they just can't afford. if there is co will live. if there isn't any co would in not live one pass and east and india setup, but over 4000000 others all over the country would likely agree. because that's how many people rely on coal to keep a roof over their heads and food on that pates. the issue goes well beyond india, though, the developing large a industrialization stage, then you know what? we've gone one space our time. we don't that they will not be able to lift their societies out of poverty, coal consumption and coal as a basis for the livelihood will remain a fact. or sometime, in fact, tens of developing countries have come together terrified of what the grand goals

of 0 emissions made up by rich nations will mean for them. this new goal, which has been drawn strom's counter to the parish agreement, and is until i equity and against climate justice demands for net 0 emissions. for all countries by 2050 will exacerbate further the existing inequities between developed and developing countries. it's not just didn't develop nations struggle as it is with fossil fuels. it's not just that millions of jobs will be also that millions will be punched into poverty. now, it's also that these nations are asking, why are we paying for greedy gonzalez? far away? the top 10 percent of countries consumed 20 times more energy than the bottom 10 percent. and 1100000000 sub saharan african share the same amount of power generation capacity. as germany's 83000000 people, video gamers and california consume more electricity than entire nations. you won't hear anything about that, a call 20 sex. and remember when times were tough, winter was coming,

a gas was running low in europe. funny how no one was shouting about being a doughty source of energy when they begged for the caps to be turned back on. but you will hear them say they won't finance fossil fuel projects in developing countries. why? because it's far away and won't affect whether that warm on a chilly december night. though if the budget can stretch, they might lend a helping hand to ease the pay. we want to do more to help countries around the world, especially developing countries, accelerate their clean energy transition, address pollution in the sure the world we all my share, a cleaner shafer healthiest plan and we have an obligation to help make no mistake . this is not a judgment on green energy. the goals of those guys that in glasgow are undoubtedly noble, but do the politicians so desperate to be seen as the leaders who saved the planet . realize what back p. r friend, me slogans actually mean for millions of people far away. and even if they did what

they do, anything differently. there are some countries are to actually have a small population but are consuming a lot of energy and imaging a lot of a carbon. there is people chrissy all around in most of the rich countries. it's not clear that they're really going to lean themselves away from cold. and i don't think that they are very realistic dogs. they have not met the 2015 accord targets yet. so i think there's a lot of bluffing going on here, and i don't read a lot of the, you know, the commitments, augi. i'm religious being made by rich countries with other a 100 world leaders and attendance. the events also attract in droves of activists on the line in the urgency for global conservation efforts, but he's premier bowers. johnson echoed that sentiment warning of a possible doomsday scenario. what americans, joe biden admitted that it was ironic that despite his environmental agenda,

he'd recently called for the oil producing cartel opec to increase production on the surface. it seems like an irony, but the truth of the matter is you've all known. every one knows that the idea we're going to be able to move to renewable energy overnight and not have and from this moment on, not used oil or not use gas or not use hydrogen, is just not rational. it is hypocritical, of course, of many of those who are supporting the agenda to have a net 0 policy to then say that we need to have the fossil fuel industry is just that politicians are not being honest with the people in the next 2 weeks as the negotiators remain in glasgow, they will come out with a communique that suggests something positive has been achieved, trying to work. but my biggest fear is that they won't be a massive move from the paris accord as most people have wanted. and i think this will be

a time when politicians have failed to achieve those big goals. a controversial climate act of his credit humbugs believes it's good to stir up some anger, among other supporters to keep them resolute in taking to the streets to protest for their calls. this is what she says in a recent interview with the bbc. as long as no one gets hurt and as long as yeah, then i think some kind of unique anguish on people. like for instance, this school strike movement would never have been. so would never have become so big if, if there wasn't fiction. if some people didn't get off, it's been a wave of demonstration, some of the un climate summit in glasgow this week. the drugs of activists blocking roads as they demand world leaders stick to the agenda. in fact, acting on advice by granted sumburgh wales, people in london, what they think of these methods. i just think those tactics alienate people won't get even signs. think it's always a good opportunity, an option to so that we really care about the world. but i think you also have to

understand the other side of a people as well. think there should be a balance with the actions on those are which kind of impact does it have to be everyday people you have to use the same method. sometimes i don't think it's a way to solve the problem. okay, in a case on a good way, that's not the way to protest. i agree. what date being on try to find a way to solve the problem bought. that could be what if they could, could do a lot of them with liquid cost. is that more normal people that making a change a british national health service executive is calling on the government to delay its mandatory cobit vaccine policy for health care staff until next year and says that the delay will held the medical service gets through the difficult winter period otherwise he says the u. k. risks and accidents of unvaccinated workers and a deepening staff shortage. we've got a very, very difficult winter coming up and we know the n h s is going to be

a full stretch. so it makes sense to set that deadline once that period has passed . if we lose very large numbers of m vaccinated stuff particularly over the winter period than that also constitutes a risk to patient safety and quality of care. it comes as you k, paramedics raise fairs of an unprecedented crisis, facing the ambulance service with one local department last week, even pleading with the public to think twice before calling as there simply aren't enough people to cover the workload. the government also put troops on stand by to help the n h. s. cope over the winter, and that could see them driving ambulances assisting with vaccines and also providing other hospital support name. while the british al secretary stressed the safety and effectiveness of inoculation urging any one eligible to get their booster jap before the winter kicks in. one doctor told us though that the vaccine is she was just one and a chair, staffing problem. there are reasons why people may choose not to get vaccine, not necessarily because they don't believe in the vaccine book. they may do the

personal religious reasons or maybe other and personal health reasons. now, we should allow individuals to have the flexibility to exercise their rights. it's a tricky one, isn't because it's a healthcare professional. i want everybody to have that maxine, but i understand this decision is personally working in the unit. just a moment. ease and exhausting. you get up early in the morning and you stay late until evening and you're not quite sure whether or not you're going to manage to work and continue to be safe. certainly thine middle of the day. you're exhausted. so fatigued is difficult to make decisions and you worried that by the afternoon patients will not get high quality care. we simply don't have the workforce anymore to provide a safe service. and we have had a huge number of people who dna just especially of the last year have thought about lenient or just i think anybody tells you that when it's liana chester, 100 percent is probably lying research by the health care workers foundation has shown that almost 75 percent of an a chest off of considered leaving within the

past 12 months with nearly every 3rd health work as saying there was a strong likelihood they would quit in the next year. okay, i get says that the n a chest needs the government to take real action as never before. i believe the government thinks they're doing enough to help the n h. s. i believe the government think dan and jesse blanket that we take too much funding that we complain too much and then we can probably give them all that is absolutely categorically wrong. then a chess is crumbling around us. we are all broken. we are all tired and we need the government to do all over the last 10 years. if we had made a decent sustained and the key part carry sustained investment in were folks this could have been averted, but it's difficult to actually invest in p p. when you're not sure if the money is going to come the following year and year after, you can only buy short packets of can show too if you're not sure that the money is going to come in the future. so the real problem that we have lack of sustain

promised investment americans, reputation on a global scale, is suffering with widespread negative views of its democratic processes as well as its health care system. as, according to a recent survey conducted in 17 countries. and it's also despite joe biden describing us democracy as the envy of the world democracy sometimes missy. it sometimes requires a little patience as well, but that patience has been rewarded now for more than 240 years, the system of government governance. and that's been the envy of the world. i said, was president biden's saying that the rest of the world doesn't seem to get a grip on. let's hope now, to long time us congressman, a former presidential candidate, wrong poll. good to have you on our team. thanks for joining us with what's fueling these doubts around the world about american democracy. do you think well, because we do have

a lot of problems and i think one of the reasons why there's this discussion going on as a lot of people don't quite understand the seriousness of the definition. because the democracy just means that the majority can tell everybody else what to do. so i don't even see pure democracy because in a way we have pure democracy. and if they vote 51 percent to treat medicaid medicines a certain way that happens about they might be wrong. what, what the answer from the libertarian it will be more freedom. let people have it. i was a physician for many, many years. the most important thing to me was the doctor patient relationship. so we wouldn't ever experience the kind of thing that just went on here because it's the corporations and government and who's going to make the proffers. so that type of democracy, that's democracy. but i blame democracy because it's the majority of your, the majority of it gets to vote. you can do whatever you want. so majorities have

to be very much guarded. you use, you use democracy to elect people, not to tell people how to practice medicine. and i think that's been the big problem why we don't look like we've done well, but i think a lot of other countries suffer from the same problem. do you think that the unprecedented turbulence of the 2020 election might have in fact impacted on these results? well, i think that's just part of it because, you know, there's a lot of friction. there are a lot of challenges and i lot of in fractions. and just seeking out the truth has been a big job right now. we know more about some of the conflict that went on with the last election. we did back then. so it was far, far from perfect. and i would say that that is an expected event in under the circumstances because there's so much at stake. see what we have now. as a corporate state, corporate patients are very, very powerful. are they influencing?

there's not people really voting. it's really the corporations that run things, so the corporations run medicine. they run the military industrial complex, they run all our schools now. so we're a long way off from what people think is democracy. know we're a long way off from freedom. we have now a reflection of democracy because the people with a lot of money and control the monetary system, they're able to influence the system. so that shouldn't be confused with freedom and it should be not substituted for it. just say, well, it's your democracy. well, it is, but they shouldn't blindly believe that 51 percent on a vote can tell everybody else how to live. that's that to me is very dangerous. well, we want is freedom and that's what our constitution is all about. the research is if this multinational serve, i have said that over the past 20 years, the results of adam flowed. sometimes, depending on who is in the white house at the time. to what extent do you think president biden nearly

a year into this term might have impacted on the results this year? well, he has, he's made it much worse, but the republicans have didn't help much either, because the republicans are very much involved in this problem. i describe that if you get 51 percent voting then you can turn it into a welfare state and then you can turn it into a corporate state and protect the big corporation. so the republicans endorse that same principle, but when boston got in and what they're doing now, it's much worse because they continue it. and now i mean, a good republic, a good system. when have a spending trillions and trillions of dollars taking advantage of the fact that we have the reserve currency, the world. and people still trust us to take care of the dollar. but that's ending . and that's why i think people are starting to say, can we really trust the americans? and right now we're on a path of continuing spending bar growing and printing money. and i,

they were on the verge of a major, major financial crisis in a banking crisis. and that will be resolved, not because we just have barton vine has made it much worse. but it's a problem of a system that's been around for 5060 years ever since we switch gears back in the depression because we just have too much government. we've involved, we've emphasized the fact that government can take care of us from cradle to grave is socialism. that is the problem. it's fascism as the problem is the combination of the politicians and big business they, they run medicine. now when i practice medicine, i made the decisions along with my patients. but now if i want to use either medicine, the government says you can't do it. if i want to use hydroxy, clara, the government says, i can't do that. and now they come up and they define things they say, well, you know, natural immunity doesn't exist actually anti science. there are controlling all

that. and that is defiance of what we want. because that means that if you are, if you believe in pure democracy can, can control of all this, then you would make definitions to help people out of practice medicine. how much money you could span, and that's, that's a system that's doomed to fail. but if the people should not say, well, that's why the americans are failing because they have too much freedom. no, they might have had too much democracy of pure voting. just put the factions together and vote special benefits for everybody. can i ask you what you think of international thoughts about the us health care system? it doesn't compare favorably in this. is that more down to the fact that you've got great health care in the united states as long as you can afford it? or do you think the response to the cobit pandemic has had an effect on this? well, it's been made much, much worse with the pandemic. because i think all the policies essentially were sensually wrong on this walk down business and spending all this money and

interfering with the practice of medicine. punishing people who wanted to have a debate on the care like we have for ever. so it's that that has made it much, much worse, and it's going to get much worse to if we don't release the freedom that the doctors need, but you can't let the corporations run most. now, most doctors work for corporation, they're not independent. i was totally independent. my patients and i made all the decision, but that's not the case now. and then you have the drug companies involved. there's a greater motivation and they've achieved much more in the demanding that people take all these vaccines. and they haven't even done the adequate testing on them. and what about the children in children and the they don't need a lot of axes. and here the corporations are government bought the vaccines before they even pretended they were testing it. so no, we deserve a lot of that criticism, but it's, it's, it's unfortunately

a whole philosophy of government that has come out of our universities, corporatism and just very quickly, mr. paul, if the survey was held across america, do you think americans would agree largely with what the 17 other developed countries see? well, you know, i have a program, the liberty report, people, i come to my program, they would agree. they would agree that america is a mass and they would probably accept my explanation of wad, because we don't have free market medicine. we have corporations running thing. so yes, a lot americans are frustrated, but a lot of americans are scared to death because they're threatened. if you don't get your vaccine, which can be very dangerous, people die sometimes, and they ought to have a choice. if you don't do that, you're fired and they lose their jobs, doctors lose their jobs. it, but it's happening in other parts of the world to this is not, these problems aren't unique to united states. i think there are very international, and there's a lot of resistance,

the crowds that are starting to resist their building in the united states. but there are some countries that are resisting this type of system more than anybody else. i'm in france and britain. you have people standing up against that, so i think i think people are waking up. i think there's a lot more resistance. i think there's a lot more resistance because the system that we're using now for the practice of medicine isn't work. okay. well, okay, yet certainly echoes everywhere wrong, paul. it's been a pleasure to talk to you. thanks for joining us on our team tonight. thank you. next, the french president has delayed retaliatory measures against the u. k. over the latest escalation and a long standing route on fishing rights, it's become a major post breakfast, stumbling point with britain now warning that it's ready to take legal action if france doesn't stick to trade agreements reached last year or on that next philosophy. charlotte to bend ski, i'm not sure that a solution is in sight, but what we've seen for the moment is that the sanctions that have been threatened

now by the french 4 weeks have at least been put on ices. more talks will take place at later this week, but i want to talk about the sanctions that have been threatened by france. they've talked about increasing the checks on vans and laurie's coming in to france accustomed checks. they talked about fanning british boats from offloading their catch here and from fishing in french waters. this even been talk about either increasing the price of electricity to the channel islands, ought to be cutting that electricity supply off altogether. so these are very serious threats as both sides are accusing each other of being in the wrong here. but the b u. k. foreign secretary list trust these accusations, these threats have to stop, stop threatening a u. k. a fishing vessels stop threatening the channel, ports and accept the we are entirely within our rights to allocate the fishing

licenses in line with the trade agreement as we have done. now, there has already been one person who has fallen foul of this fuel. a casualty that was a british trula that was detained by the french authorities last week. the french accusing the skipper of that trula of not having the right licenses to fish in french water for scallops. now was the result. the boat was detained, and we understand that the skipper, whose spacing those charges will appear in court next year, if found guilty, could face a fine of up to $75000.00 euro. so, you know, that's no small beer when you're looking at what the results could be of this escalation of any tensions between the french and the brits over fishing licenses. now france, once more license is, it says that the u. k. must provide these licenses under the withdrawal agreement for the briggs. it chord, the u. k says look, we're abiding by everything that we committed to. so neither side wanting to

particularly stand down in this situation. those talks ongoing. but for fishermen who rely on being able to go to british waters to land, they catch that french rich men here they are just fed up with all of these delays . and only we have been in limbo regarding the issue of access to british waters near jersey in guernsey for 11 months. now. i know very well the tactical maneuvers by both sides. everyone immediately beginning to flex their muscles. fishermen however, do not want to live on benefits. they want to earn their own money. las cruces hard for us. the fishermen did not ask for briggs. it before it happened. they had the right to fish everywhere, and then they were suddenly told no, you cannot turn to the area on the british side. this leads to a decrease in turnover and makes boats less profitable. now, here in berlin soon there, which is frances largest fishing port. fishing is a huge industry. it's not just about the fishermen who go out and want to fish in

those british waters is also about the vendors. and the knock on effect that, that has on the economy of a port town like this. and we've been speaking to locals here. you say that they not only fully support the idea of sanctions, but they ready to blockade the port and of us because she that we should use it. i think it's very go to france, imposed sanctions, and forbid the english to come here, because we have no rights and we don't even have anything to sell. i think our boats are ready to blog to port. it's necessary that the british give licenses to the french. i know they protect their own interests, but they need to stick to their commitments as fish mongers were unhappy because the british fish is always sell the most. it's around 80 percent overall. there's also an accusation from the british that this is a bit more than just about the fishing licenses. that this is about politics, particularly as ad there is a presidential election here in france in the next 6 months. although at present michael hasn't officially declared yet. it is expected that he will be seeking re election,

and this is seen by many in the u. k as being his way of shoring up some support ahead of those difficult election months. and that this is an issue that's been used as a wider political reason. we know that sean cast x, the french prime minister, he had written to the european union, calling for the union to act more strongly against british. and also suggesting that this was a way of perhaps showing us the would be briggs, etc, a type countries in the u. if they're thinking of doing the same, that leaving the book is incredibly difficult. the talked though on these fishing licenses, due to take place later this week, we'll wait for the results of that. but i would just say, given what we've heard over the last few months, neither is going to be likely to let the other off the hook very easily. moscow based cybersecurity firm, ca, sperski lab, says there's been a sharp rise in counterfeit cobit vaccination certificates for sale on the dark web on offer for around $300.00 apiece with

a choice of country and manufacture up including astrazeneca, pfizer, johnson, and johnson or madonna. we've seen this market developed a lot during the spring and the same time when we have seen different criminals trying to sell vaccines and lex and certificates as well. so for now, we just the, the new, a fucking of all the cameras who are just people who have nothing and they're just going online in some underground firms market something i will sell you anything you want, including certificates included in vaccination, those us, whatever. and there are just trying to convince people to give them money. and there is like not a lot of ways to track them physically because they're accept some payments and come to some they are using private shots for communications. august 1st

lab says it's impossible for those who buy the counterfeit certificates to know what they're really getting. the main thing that we are highlighting and least research sheet that there is no way to check whether those 7 criminals are just cameras. horror trying to take money from, from the victims and given nothing back or they're actually having a way to send these kind of certificates doing that puts users on the risk. we should remember that these kind of commerce and some criminals, whatever they're always trying to take advantage of the current situation in the world. and they're always trying to steal or to get money from victims. so that's our for, let's say new tea just to give you heads up for the general public and say, hey, there is something going wrong. please be aware. mister k, finishing off with a very unusual sight here in moscow and

a definite sign that autumn. well, and truly hit overnights, and through this morning, a thick blanket of folk descended on the capital and up to the city to declare a yellow emergency because of the reduced visibility, drivers were off to be extra attentive, pedestrians advised to wear very bright clothes because of this is not something you see every day. i don't think i've seen a focus this thick in the 13 years. i've been here. school to flight had to be cancelled to, although it is clearing up now that she news for now i'll be back in half an hour with the next something with the ah, i russia this cause of car was discontinued more than 20 years ago. even off of them, i don't know the sort of mixed up dealing but it's just important practice. it took