ah, ah, president putin pledges that russia will be carbon neutral, no later than 2060 and a message to delegate said the una climate summit in scotland. as the web pushes for action at cop $26.00. we look at how their ambitious plans might hurt nations dependent on fossil fuels. and then h has executive forms that mandatory vaccines for britain's healthcare staff could spock an exodus of workers and put lives at risk and france delays its retaliatory measures against the u. k. in a dispute, over fishing rights off the britain threatens legal action. and ah, one of their live and world wide, they says arty international from moscow. my name is colleen bray with the world

news this our 1st then the u. n's. climate summit got down to business in scotland with president putin endorsing russia's commitment to become a carbon neutral economy. no later than 2060 in support of global conservation efforts. as they was alicia, having set the task of building a carbon neutral economy, no later than 2060 russia is also relying on the unique resources of our forest ecosystems. enough fair, significant potential for absorbing carbon dioxide and producing oxygen. we will indeed, our country has about 20 percent of all the world's forest areas it nauseous or india, and which is one of the world's biggest pollutants is also set a target for becoming carbon neutral, the year 2070 missing the summit goal by 2 decades. the indian prime ministers also asked for more money to be told out to developing countries for their transition to cleaner energy southgate taylor next looks at how complying with emission goals may not be that simple foundations heavily dependent on fossil fuels. hope $26.00 his

hair and it's going to save us from doomsday. i've a 100 wild lead as a setting out their goals for the future and that big ones. stop deforestation switched to renewables. 0 emissions an ohio electric, nasty thing nature like a toilet. we are digging our own grapes. humanity has long since run down the clock on climate change. it's one minute to midnight on that doomsday clock and we need to act. now, client change is already ravaged oral. we only have a brief window left before us to raise or visions and to arrange to meet the task. sounds great. the question is, who pay the biggest price for all these politicians patches? it's easy for bo chat and co to promise to turn off the light when they leave a room. but for others half way around the world, saying no to fossil fuels is

a luxury. they just can't afford. if there is co will live. if there isn't any co would in not live one pass and east and india that but over 4000000 others all over the country would likely agree. because that's how many people rely on coal to keep a roof over their heads and food on that pates. the issue goes well beyond india, though, the developing large a industrialization stage, then what we can call one space, our time. we don't that they will not be able to lift their societies out of poverty, coal consumption and coal as a basis for the livelihood will remain a fact for some time. in fact, tens of developing countries have come together terrified of what the grand goals of 0 emissions made up by rich nations will mean for them. this new goal, which has been advanced, runs counter to the parish agreement, and is until i equity and against climate just demands for net 0 emissions,

for all countries by 2050 will exacerbate further the existing inequities between developed and developing countries. it's not just that developing nations struggle as it is with fossil fuels. it's not just that millions of jobs will be also that millions will be punched into poverty. now, it's also that these nations are asking, why are we paying for greedy gonzalez? far away? the top 10 percent of countries consume 20 times more energy than the bottom 10 percent. and 1100000000 sub saharan african share the same amount of power generation capacity. as germany's 83000000 people, video gamers and california consume more electricity than entire nations. you won't hear anything about that, a called 20 sex. and remember when times were tough when to was coming, a gas was running low in europe. funny how no one was shouting about being a doughty source of energy when they begged for the tops to be turned back on. but

you will hear them say they won't finance fossil fuel projects in developing countries. why? because it's far away and won't affect whether that warm on a chilly december night. though if the budget can stretch, they might lend a helping hand to ease the pay. we want to do more to help countries around the world, especially developing countries, accelerate their crane energy transition, address pollution. sure. the world we all my share. a cleaner shafer healthiest plan and we have an obligation to help make no mistake. this is not a judgment on green energy. the goals of those guy that in glasgow are undoubtedly noble. but due to politicians, so desperate to be seen as the leaders, his saved the pan, it realized what that p. r friend, me slogans actually mean for millions of people far away. and even if they did what they do, anything differently. there are some countries are to actually have small populations but are consuming a lot of energy and getting

a lot of capital. carbon people all around in most of the rich countries. it's not clear that they are really going to be themselves of it from coal. and i don't think that maybe realistic target will not much the 2015 batteries accord targets yet. so i think there's a lot of bluffing going on here, and i don't believe a lot of the, you know, the commitments are the pledges being made by rich countries with over a 100 world leaders in attendance. the events also try and control of activists, underlining the agency for global conservation, as it's pretty premier bowers. johnson echoed that sentiment warning of a possible doomsday scenario. while americans, joe biden admitted that it was, i run it. that's his environmental agenda. he'd recently called for the all producing cars, how opec to increase production on the surface, it seems like an irony, but the truth of the matter is you've all known. everyone knows that the idea we're

going to be able to move to renewable energy overnight and not have and from this moment, not use oil or not use gas or not use hygiene is just not rational. and let's go live now to dr. rather, go to the social department. britton's lancaster university. doctor. good. you're welcome to elsie. is mr. bye. all right, so please have the irony is asking for more oil bodies as a green. somebody mean, i never thought that i was gonna ever quote, a greater than bird, but blah, blah blah, i think is the best way that we can articulate what happened at cobb county is sick certainly, you know, biden's having to pay attention to the workforce or who may be voting for him if he runs again for president, and he needs to let people know that their jobs will still remain while people who are talking about climate change issues are continuing to focus on governments and trying to have them strong corporations instead of actually part of the

corporations themselves, the burden can't just be on the individual and on politicians it has to be on the corporations and at some place that governments won't go. they get too many benefits from working so closely with governments. so really the green washing them . we've heard words like bluffing him. we sail the big leaders saying, talking the talk. and there's been some quite stirring speeches from some of the smaller nations about how that really going to be affected by global warming, rising tides and such like, but you hear countries like the u. s. and in europe, and they bigger asian economy saying yes, yes, yes, but it's someone else's problem. well, you know, when i was studying climate change, communication in miami, where there's massive sea level rise coming up to the poorest limestone. they're the government officials and businesses to talk about solutions, but there are no solutions. if there aren't dollar signs attached to it, and you don't see in their rhetoric does coming through actual discussion about numbers and certainly they'll, they'll throw out a range of how many dollars or pesos or pounds it will take to,

to do one project or another. but those aren't hard numbers, we don't know how they're going to be funded. and we know that governments aren't serious about things until i actually talk about how much something's going to cost . and quite frankly, how they're going to pay for it. is that something they can realistically do just thinking about what happened after the paris agreement, and i'm old enough to remember what didn't didn't happen after the care. so protocol a couple of decades ago, is this something they can do this time to halt global emissions? like they say they want it? well, the i, or the other irony here, quite frankly, as you know, joe biden and others talking about alternative forms of transportation or electricity. the same time that car 26 was happening trains on the west side of england. i was a part of that trying to get to london are completely shut down for 60 or 70 miles backed up because a tree fell on some lines. we don't have infrastructure even in these rich nations, to really set off are to this new horizon that joe biden is actually talking about

. so maybe he's ironic, but maybe he's actually right that we don't have plans, but somebody somewhere must have plans. they must have some ideas, right. why are we not talking to those people who can figure this out? but by quite simply, people trying to get to cut 26 couldn't get there because there weren't trains leaving london, houston. they're all stuck at a standstill some stranded for 4 hours, das infrastructure, at least in england, where we be looking at going, if we weren't using oil. so it's, it is complicated, but somebody has to have the answers. is it because it's just too politically unpalatable? because, well, a couple of generations ago, people could put pollution from factories, it was quantifiable, and people could see it. whereas now in order to cut down that kind of pollution, you could ask people to cut that consumption as well. and that's politically unpalatable, isn't it? they got to stop streaming that go to stop a big on the computer. it's for days at a time. mean, i have students who are concerned about printing out an academic paper to make them

snow to just to make themselves smarter. but then i ask how many cell phones they've had, you know, weren't in the number of doesn't we have to change how we use data farms. we have to change how we, by fashion, we have to change how that, that daily operation of the phone in our lives, in gaming, in our lives and streaming as, as you mentioned. but quite frankly, we also have to go in make the hard choices and joe biden, who is very clearly a centrist and has been for his entire political career on the coattails of brock obama, who probably ended up being as interest tune many ways isn't willing. and able to take those steps so. so progressives in the u. s. in the left liberals and the in the, in the us are, you know, just shaking their heads. let's go ahead and make these plans not talk. what in details get rid of oil, but we don't have any plans for that yet. and we can't all just bet on having a tesla. it's very complicated, but somebody somewhere has to do something. and as they produce the energy,

doesn't it? and do you think in some ways that the u. s. and the by the ministration can help swerve responsibilities a bit here by saying we're doing all we can. but look at china producing all that pollution when as one they call it is to put it, it's west and pollution is just bit off shore to, to china. to make things like i phones and other western hardware. well i just don't think that you know, something like how 26 is a or any of these cops are, are, are there obligatory at this point? i mean it's, it's about showing up and shaking hands, drinking the echo, coming up with some ideas i'm looking for that. does that mean there haven't been substantial real changes, but to say that we're going to end deforestation that. but then at the same time, we're building windmills in turbans, to, to make electricity that comes from deforestation. we're not really unpacking this enough. it's, these events are pseudo news. events are created for media for people to feel good

and hopefully to come out with some policy. but some of us, unfortunately, just aren't hopeful. okay, what is something they can discuss on a hundreds of private jets they using to get to glasgow for this conference? public which i really appreciate your time time. thanks for joining us. naulty. thanks me. well, climate activist got the phone book, thinks it's good for the green protest movement. a stir up a bit of anger, a claim she made in a recent interview with a, b, b, c. as long as no one gets hurt and as long as yeah. then i think sometimes a unique angle. some people, like, for instance, this school shrink movement would never have been, so would never become so big if, if there wasn't friction. if some people didn't get off, it has been a wave of demonstrations and the un climate summit in glasgow this. we drove activists blocking roads as they demand worldly, to stick to the agenda, in fact, acting on advice by gratitude. but we asked people in london, what they think of these methods. i just think those tactics alienate people often

get on site. think it's always a good opportunity, an option to show that we really care about the world that i think you also have to understand the other side of a people as well. fingers should be a balance with in reactions on us or which kind of impact does it have to be everyday people you have to use these 3 methods sometime i don't think is a way to solve the problem or get in a page on that good way that's not the way to protest. i agree. what date being on try to find a way to solve the problem board. that could be why this thing they could do and get their support of them. probably because this is more normal people that making a change the group representing britain state run hospitals and trusts is calling on the government to delay its mandatory cobit vaccine policy for health care staff until next year. the had a bad h as provider says, that'll help the medical serve as get through the difficult winter period. otherwise, the u. k. risks, an exodus of unvaccinated workers and

a deepening staff shortage. we've got a very, very difficult winter coming up. and we know the n h s is going to be a full stretch, so it makes sense to set that deadline. once that period has passed, if we lose very large numbers of m vaccinated staff, particularly over the winter period, then that also constitutes a risk to patient safety and quality of care. i comes to as u. k. paramedics race fairs of an unprecedented crisis facing the ambulance service with one local department last week, even pleading with the public to think twice before calling as the simply aren't enough people to cover the workload. the government also put troops on standby to help the n h has cope over the winter, and that could see them driving ambulances assisting with vaccines and providing other hospital support. meanwhile, the british health secretary stress the safety and effectiveness of inoculation, hurting anyone eligible to get their booster jap before winter. one doctor told us though that the vaccine issue was just one and a tear staffing problem. there are reasons why people may choose not to get to

vaccine, not necessarily because they don't believe in the vaccine book that may do the personal religious reasons or maybe other and personal health reasons. now we should allow individuals to have the flexibility to exercise their rights. it's a tricky one, isn't because as a healthcare professional, i want everybody to have that maxi. but i understand this decision is personally working in the area. just a moment, ease and exhausting. you get up early in the morning and you stay late until evening and you're not quite sure whether you're not going to manage to work and continue to be safe. certainly by the middle of the day you're exhausted. so fatigued is difficult to make decisions and you worry that by the afternoon patients will not get high quality care. we simply don't have the workforce anymore to provide a safe service. and we have had a huge number of people who dna just especially of the last year. i have thought about the year just think anybody tells you went to the n h s percent. it's

probably lighting research by the health care workers foundation has shown that almost 75 percent of an h. s. stuff of considered leaving within the past 12 months with nearly every 3rd health workers saying there was a strong likelihood that they would quit in the next year. thought tag, it says the n h s needs the government to take real action as never before. a doing and then i just, i believe the government think it blanket that we take too much funding that we complain too much and we can probably give them all that was absolutely categorically wrong in a chest is crumbling around us. we are all broken. we are all tired and we need the government to do all over the last 10 years, we had made a decent, sustained, and the key hire i carry sustained investment in. this could have been averted, but it's difficult to actually invest in compete when you're not sure if the money is going to come the following year and year after. you can only buy short packets

can show to. if you're not sure that the money is going to come in the future, so the real problem that we have, lack of sustained promised investment i, on the way a top cybersecurity firms, pointed out the growing online black market for counterfeit vaccinations, certificates. we'll take a look into that offer this bright a and i dream shaped banks interest in

there's things we dare to ask in ah, ah ah ah ah, come again next to

a spot in the channel. the french president has delayed retaliatory measures against the u. k. over the latest escalation and a long standing row on fishing rights, it's become a major post, practice it stumbling point with britain now warning, but it's ready to take legal action if france doesn't stick to the trade agreements reached last year. his art, he shouted to pinsky, i'm not sure that a solution is in sight, but what we've seen for the moment is that the sanctions that have been threatened now by french for weeks have at least been put on ice, is more talks will take place at later this week, but i want to talk about the sanctions that have been threatened by france. they've talked about increasing the checks on bands and laurie's coming in to france. so customers chat, they talked about banding, british boats from offloading their catch here and from fishing in french waters, there's even been talk about either increasing the price of electricity to the channel islands ought to be cutting that electricity supply off altogether. so

these are very serious threats as both sides are accusing each other of being in the wrong here. but the u. k. foreign secretary list trust these accusations, these threats have to stop, stop threatening a u. k. a fishing vessels stop threatening the channel, ports and accept the we are entirely within our rights to allocate the fishing licenses in line with the trade agreement as we have done. now, there has already been one person who has fallen foul of this fuel. a casualty that was a british trula that was detained by the french authorities last week. the french accusing the skipper of that trula of not having the right licenses to fish in french water for scallops. now, as a result, the boat was detained and we understand that the skipper, the spacing, those charges will appear in court next year if found guilty, could face a fine of up to $75000.00 euro. so, you know,

that's no small beer when you're looking at what the results could be of this escalation of any tensions between the french and the brit over fishing licenses. now, france wants more license is, it says that the u. k. must provide these licenses under the withdrawal agreement for the briggs. it cord, the u. k says look, we're abiding by everything that we committed to. so neither side wanting to particularly stand down in this situation. those talks ongoing, but the fishermen who rely on being able to go to british waters to land. they catch that's french fitch men here. they are just fed up with all of these delays. and only we have been in limbo regarding the issue of access to british waters near jersey in guernsey for 11 months now. i know very well the tactical maneuvers by both sides. everyone immediately beginning to flex their muscles. fishermen, however, do not want to live on benefits. they want to earn their own money. las cruces hard

for us. the fishermen did not ask for briggs, it before it happened. they had the right to fish everywhere, and then they were suddenly told, no, you cannot enter the area on the british side. this leads to a decrease in turnover and makes boats less profitable. now, here in berlin soon there, which is frances largest fishing port. fishing is a huge industry. it's not just about the fishermen who go out and want to fish in those british waters is also about the vendors. and the knock on effect that, that has on the economy of a port town like this. and we've been speaking to locals here. you say that they not only fully support the idea of sanctions, but they ready to blockade the port of us because she'd that we should use it. i think it's very go to france, imposed sanctions, and forbid the english to come here, because we have no rights and we don't even have anything to sell. i think our boats are ready to blog to port. it's necessary that the british give licenses to the french. i know they protect their own interests, but they need to stick to their commitments as fish mongers were unhappy because

the british fish is always sell the most. it's around 80 percent overall. there's also an accusation from the british, but this is a bit more than just about the fishing licenses that this is about politics, particularly as ad there is a presidential election here in france in the next 6 months. although i present my con hasn't officially declared yet, it is expected that he will be seeking re election. and this is seen by many in the u. k as being his way of shoring up some support ahead of those it difficult election months. and that this is an issue that's been used as a wider political reason. we know that as on cast x, the french prime minister, he had written to the european union calling for the union to act more strongly against the british. and also suggesting that this was a way of perhaps showing other would be briggs, etc, a type countries in the you, if they're thinking of doing the same that leaving the block is incredibly difficult. the talked though on these fishing licenses,

due to take place later this week, we'll wait for the results of that. but i would just say, given what we've heard over the last few months, neither is going to be likely to let the other off the hook very easily. oscar based that cybersecurity firm, esparza lab, says there's been a sharp rise in counterfeit coping vaccination certificates for sale on the dark web on offer for around $300.00 apiece with a choice of country and manufacturer, including astrazeneca, pfizer, johnson, and johnson or madonna. we've seen this market developed a lot during the spring and the same time when we have 1st in different some criminals trying to sell vaccines and lex and certificates as well. so for now, we just the, the new, a fucking of all the commerce piece are just people who have nothing and they're just going online in some underground firms market something i will sell you

anything you want, including certificates included in vaccination, those us, whatever. and there are just trying to convince people to give them money. and there is like not a lot of ways to track them physically because they're accept some payments and carmen to some they are using private transfer communications. well, as a word, a warning for anyone tempted sperski lab says it's impossible for those who, by the counterfeit certificates to know what they're really getting. the main thing that we're high life in least research should. and there's no way to check whether those said criminals are just cameras, horror trying to take money from, from the victims and do nothing back or. ready they're actually having way to send these kind of certificates during the fuser on the risk. we should remember the, the, these kinds of commerce and some criminals,

whatever. they're always trying to take advantage of the current situation in the world. and they are always trying fuel or to get money from victims. so that's our, let's say do t, just give you a heads up for the general public and say, hey, there is something going on wrong. please be aware of that and be secure. i finishing off them with a very unusual sight hair in moscow and a definite sign that all is well and truly here. overnight and through this morning, a thick blanket of folk descended on the capital. you don't get a bit of a missed you don't normally get a folk this thank heavens enough for the city to declare a yellow emergency. because of the reduced visibility drive is to ask to be extra 10 different use to drive it in these kind of condition to get and pedestrians advised to wear bright clothes. it also meant schools of flights had to be cancelled to but they've since caught up. it's been votive and haunting images. i take a look online. i love you. a lot of people have been taking pictures of it in the past 24 hours. that's it for you to use for now. boom bust is next. your next

update for me is it's 32 minutes here. ah wow. you know, things are, of course, playing out as we've been protecting the way. we've got the very central banks putting on their kabuki costumes and getting ready to go out on stage and perform their ritual list. it's not to the need to raise rates, followed by their ritualistic denial that they are able to raise rates, followed by massive quantitative easing. money printing ann hyperinflation. once again. oh boy, it gets so entertaining. the british and american governments have often been accused of destroying lives in their own interests. while you see in this,

these techniques is to stay devising methods to essentially destroy the personality of an individual by scientific means. this is how one doctors, theories were allegedly used in psychological warfare against prisoners deemed a danger to the state. that was the foundation for the method of psychological interrogation, psychological torture, disseminated within the us intelligence community, and worldwide among allies for the next 30 years. been down to victim say they still live with the consequences today. ah, with this is been by phone business. you can't afford to miss. i'm rachel,

blood leverage aboard. and washington coming up as the world's most powerful nation, met at the g. 20 summit in rome, leaders rally together to talk about tackling the ongoing going supply chain. well . well discuss what came out of the summit was we take you back to the trade feed where the united states and european union are coming up that take on what they call over capacity even chinese producer. then american airlines cancels moving to 1000 flights in a single weekend, putting the blame on staffing shortages and bad weather. well, the staff with an expert in the field. we have a lot to cover today for let's get started. and we leave the program with a follow up to the weekends meetings of some of the world's wealthiest nations. during his speech, president biden called on leaders of the g 20 summit to come together to solve the world's supply chain issues. as they continue to threaten the state of the global recovery.