for some panel discussion, and i don't know of the nickname, sleepy joe can be applied to president biden after his life, even conversation. the president chief, which lasted 3 and a half hours. while there were lots of talk of more cooperation between the 2 world super powers, there was no breakthroughs on key issues like taiwan, trade and human rights. making. some ask are the 2 countries in the midst of a cold war? and we have all had to that moment and we've been in conversation with others in person and magically the next time we checked our phone and i had popped up related to what exactly we were talking about. some i find this convenient others and i find it creepy. we will dive into the technology involved as well as why this invasion of privacy is legal. i'm here is we're going to give you the 360 view of these stories on today's news. b, it's used right here on our t america. ah,

we start today off with the latest on the virtual meeting between president biden and chinese president. she, jim pink at the talks were expected to be centered around the future of taiwan. but the morning after china's foreign minister now says the vital ministration admit it does not support an independent one and will respect the one china policy from best co host to investigative journalist, ben swan reports. according to the chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, president joe biden admitted that the united states adheres to the one china policy and does not support taiwanese independence during monday nights. virtual meeting with president pain, even during the meeting, president biden admitted again the united states. and here's the one china policy and does not support high ones independence and got as we've reported, china has increasingly stepped up military aggression toward taiwan over the past,

including over 100 military incursions into ty, one's airspace. recently. that was the backtrack for monday meeting between president biden and present g. yeah. during the opening of the virtual recounted story from their time travelling with each other. sometimes quoting each other's words from that era function. as i said before, seems to me our responsibility as leaders of china in the united states. to ensure that the competition between our countries does not vary. the conflict whether intended or unintended. just simple, straightforward competition as the world to biggest economy and permanent members of the un security council, china and the u. s. communication and cooperation. we should not take care of our own domestic affairs, but also assume our new international responsibility to jointly promote the noble cause, peace and development of mankind. before the meeting began, president bodies suggested that he would reference new guard rails on the issue of taiwan. and while by didn't did reference concerns about chinese behavior that

threatened stability in the taiwan straits. he never did said any of those new guardrails referenced to started the talks. which leaves a series of questions about how china will proceed in its aggression toward taiwan . for news news, news, i've been one series of questions that we're going to try to get some answers from and we bring and steve gill, a former official in the us trade representative's office. steve, i want to get to this double speak in a 2nd, but i want to start off though with this friendship that seems to happening between president she and president biden, you know, president by an initially earlier in the day and said, nope, we're not old friends. and i thought it was funny because when president chief 1st got i said, hailed friend, it was like, he was watching and he went to kind of already go to that as well as the timeframe a pm in america, yet am in china. so i mean, he was more of an advantage on that when you know that was a big criticism though the president trump had it was that he was too cozy with tears and friends. yesterday's conversation seemed like a them friends yet. are we seeing any criticism off of the events yesterday and how

the to actually handled each other? well, we certainly didn't hear any questions in the whole 3 hour meeting about co in china's responsibility for that. i was also taken by the note, my good friend intro that the president she came with because you just had jen sack you claiming that the president and presidency are not good friends. you have the president himself say we're not good friends. and then president, she opens it up or the president she's been studying the trump troll book on how to troll people and intentionally. and with that, just to mess with joe biden, to show that he's. he's playing games in his head and living in his head just like donald trump as well. but didn't you go to actually what was said there and i have to tell you i'm a little bit confused. because here you have the form restrict route to say and said no president by an agreed that taiwan one china we're all in together. that's exactly opposite though, from what you're hearing here in america. this idea of rationing out that china can invade taiwan. what is the united states going to do about we actually hurt our

friendship with france, making sure that we sold, say we how to solve the marines to australia with this idea of national if a national security, if the china and bay taiwan, i'm hearing a lot of double speak right now. what is the truth in this, or it is by did not even now. i don't think by knows, more importantly, i don't think the by the administration has a clue what they're doing. keep in mind that the one china policy has been played out in how the chinese have treated hong kong. there were supposed to be almost a 2 china separation. so that hong kong could operate with democratic principles and with a free market system that has been crushed without any real pushback by the united states. so the chinese have seen that they could walk all over hong kong, impose their will on hong kong, started arresting people who speak out against the government of china and hong kong and the united states. and the rest of the world didn't lift a finger, they are now being very aggressive in their stance toward taiwan. and we should be very concerned about that as are the south koreans, as our japan, australia,

the entire pacific coast. because china is being very aggressive and the u. s. administration under biden is not doing anything to push back in any measurable way . well, that's all thing. yeah, we are hearing reports. see that there's actually u. s. troops, overtraining in training, taiwanese army, they're over there to actually training right now. they're obviously in south korea, you know, see, on one hand, you're hearing this idea that, oh yes, the u. s. is gonna back up tiwana china evades. and then you've been telling, this is very dangerous to me because you're getting 2 different measures and are they not today than media is not covering that media is not say no, according to the chinese minister, they yes, bite and told them that if we made taiwan they're not gonna do anything about it. that's exactly opposite of the rhetoric that we're hearing out of the media out of this white house here at home. do they not think people talk to each other? well, and keep in mind that we got into the 1st gulf war when you had the administration basically say to around we don't, we don't mind if you invade kuwait or erect,

we don't might have to invade kuwait and they did because they were given the green light that the president has now, given china, essentially the green light to take action against taiwan and they are watching very closely as the u. s. doesn't do anything around the world to, to kind of step up in the face of these kinds of aggressive pastors, whether it's by i said in the ukraine, whether it's by china and what they did in hong kong and our, our focusing on ty wants keep in mind that internally china, the china has very difficult financial situations. their manufacturing is on the slide, their, their growth is on the slide. china is essentially a 3rd world country outside of their major cities like hong kong gong to beijing and a few others. so there are serious economic problems with in china and the best way to hold your company or your country together, like a company under fire, if you then make aggressive postures against others. and this is what we've seen throughout history. when you go to war, that helps pull your people together. it helps overcome the economic distress

within your country. and it is a dangerous situation that i don't think the by the administration recognizes, even in the smallest portion, 3 and a half hours, stay 3 and a half hours talk about very important issue. they did not discuss the nuclear arsenal. they did not discuss how to prevent future viruses like the chronic virus from coming out of their borders. and it looks like what they did was double speak and actually said, nope, china, we're gonna have to stay out of it. we support you doing whatever you need to do a tie one next time. maybe the president doesn't need to speak to them. i don't know. unfortunately what we did here was a lot of double fake. steve, always great to talk to you here at home. i'll either on connect to wisconsin not only for the jury verdict, but the public reaction. when i have more on the details from the ground after the break. a is you'll need the a reflection of reality. in the world transformed what will make you feel safe,

isolation community? are you going the right way or are you being that with what is true? i want to stay in the world corrupted. you need to descend to join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. ah, there is a patch of water around the child seal island that's in contention. between canada and the united states, northern government may suddenly become optimal for lobster. our populations years exploded. one of the most valuable fisheries that's ever existed. suddenly you had made an canadian fisherman in these waters. at the same time jousting for position

and attentions are high. violence is bound to happen. this is the last land border dispute between canada and the united states. it could be magnified to the point where there could be costs that would be significant to post countries. border disputes don't go away. they discussed, or something's going to happen with

. ah, the jury is deliberating in the trial of cal written house, the 8 year old, who shot and killed 2 men. and we're here to 3rd, during the unrest in kenosha, wisconsin. my thumb or that's where our teeth at john had he is actually live with the latest. john, thank you so much for joining me. you know, is the jury expecting to possibly reach a verdict when well, that's, that's the big question isn't. have the jury's been deliberating so right around 10 am this morning, scotty. so we're going, you know, it's a little past 4 o'clock hour an hour behind you on the east coast. so now the better part of 56 hours, whether they'll reach a verdict tonight or whether the deliberations will continue tomorrow,

whether they'll recess or the will. tough it out and go into the night out that are, that's one among many questions. at this point, the jury at 12616 men, women were pick from a full of 18. and earlier today actually a bailiff where the tumbler. 7 went over to paul rittenhouse, the defendant, and it was written house who actually pulled the numbers out of the 6 alternates will be standing by and that's how they got down to that number 12. it's not unusual for that kind of like lottery drawing to happen as far as you know. pulling the 12 jurors was very unusual though. is that written house did it? and that was by instruction in order from the judge in the case judge brew schrader now during the deliberations earlier today. this is one significant point. i should mention. the jury asked the judge for extra copies of the jury instructions, specifically pages one through 6 having to do with self defense and also with provocation guidelines and also for crimes within 10 to kill. so the jury was

asking for extra copy of the jury instructions, and that's all part of you know, when the jury has a question, the question is submitted to the judge. and then the judge, you know, gives the jury what it's, what it's asking for. written house is charged with 5 felony counts. let me go through these counts quickly for you. the top one is 1st agree, reckless homicide. use of a dangerous weapon. now this is connected along with cow 2 to the jeff death of joseph rosenbaum, the 1st man that written how shot and killed count 2 is 1st degree recklessly endangerment, endangering safety for the use of a dangerous weapon. account 3, 1st degree, recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon, and count for 1st degree intentional homicide. use of a dangerous weapon. both of these towns are connected to the 2nd man that chiron has shot and killed anthony hubert. count 5 attempted 1st degree intentional homicide. use of the dangerous weapon is connected to the 5th man that car

rittenhouse shot and badly injured bob. but that person did survive his wounds, though they were very serious. excuse me, was now the judge in this case. as i mentioned bruce schrader, he dismissed 2 other counts from 6 and 7 count. 6 of the schools found a technicality. and had to deal with the barrel length of the a r 15 style rifle that a written house was using that he was carrying i. so that was dismissed on a technicality, an account set and had to do with a courtesy violation the both of those were thrown out before the actual before the jury began it's deliberations. the trial has been dramatic at times, as we've seen over the course of the days that was held. there are firey exchanges between judge raider and between the lead prosecutor and the case. thomas bear with schrader getting being really angry at being are who's trying to basically bring up some evidence. that trader already said wasn't going to be yours. i some testimony

that was not going to be here or in the trial with rittenhouse breaking down when he took the stand up breaking down, getting very emotional on stan and then obviously the dramatic footage that was his and particularly in a closing argument. it's the video of rosenbaum after the shot being laid on the ground, his eyes basically rolling in the back of his head as he was dying. some of the really graphic and gruesome video that was showed live 9 only to the jurors, not only to the courtroom that was also broadcast, live on tv during the ongoing coverage. so that was incredibly dramatic. the governor of wisconsin and tony evers has activated on stand by 500 national guard troops to assist local law enforcement. if a verdict is reached. if there is any potential violence or unrest at this point, scottie, it has remain pretty quiet. there's about by my counters about 2 dozen, maybe 3 dozen protesters that have been here on the courthouse steps throughout the day, calling for justice for the victim,

for the base of the victims. for the 3 men that were shot, the 2 men fatally the one who was badly injured. um, you know, so again, the question is, when will we have a verdict? will the jury recess for the night? will it continue into the evening before possibly recessing for tomorrow? i guess again those, those are among many of the questions, but at this point there is a law enforcement presence. not a huge lot more since president, but it doesn't look like there's going to be any. it doesn't seem like anything is throwing at this moment, but again, you know, all eyes are on the court house on what happens with this jury if a verdict is rich and when that is handed down. scott, to discuss both brand dominic, he's a retired police officer. now dominic, there are a lot of he did emotions in this case. could this just be the calm before the storm? all the typical quiet mob before the start of my plan for the storm stuff. i don't, i don't even know what the, the,

the mob wants at this point. i don't know how much more they're going to be. just this all outrage of, we want a verdict going at our decision. i think america is so tired of this cry, baby outrage from these activists. you're not going to get any type of fair trials . you're not going to get any type of will you also, you will get a fair verdict. this trial was getting to watch from start to finish. but at this point, you know what, what's the point of what this mob is doing in these activists in these protests? are they gonna just gonna create a number? can osha riot that's going to bring out another kyle written house. so this cycles just never going to and, and i'm, this is about an hour from my house. i'm getting tired of this stuff and it's just getting real old. and that's the frustration on this, and some people are right now i'm voicing their anger at the prosecution. they feel like the prosecutor was very weak and the job that they did. how did you view? you said it was now jane to watch different points. you know, you had to just kind of cringe. but did you think they did a good job trying to actually prove to the jury their goal that rittenhouse did not

act in self defense, but actually he murdered 2 people and that was his intent the whole time. no, the prosecution was abysmal. and i, i made a statement yesterday saying if anybody's ever thinking about getting in a law enforcement watched the prosecution and thomas pinger from the case. and you will know that if you ever became a cop in kenosha county, you're, you're, you're going to be screwed because this man is gonna just rip up all your works. the one great thing and, and again, this goes back in a black lives matter. this goes back in an activist when you have what people are seeing as unfair trial, the one thing that people really have to start understanding is that the district attorneys are states attorneys depending upon your state. they work with the police and police. i don't know what the conversation was when rittenhouse was arrested, but police to make a suggestion a, this is all the facts. this is the evidence. this is what our suggestion is. and it's up to the states or the district attorney to make a decision whether or not they are a prosecutor. it's honestly my thoughts that long for some presented all of their information. evidence to of the prosecution said, hey,

we're just not dealing with this because they don't want to be held liable. prosecution just got the all we, we have to make this a political case and they, i don't know how to describe it. it made no sense watching him for this honest and tell you what the totality of, of what i got on the, on the canal show prosecutor's offices, is if you're a female, god forbid. and you go out to a bar. and you are just taken advantage of and raped the prosecution is going to ask what you did to your attacker to instigate it. that's exactly how he came across and his whole prosecution. and it just made no sense to me. well, i remember your matthew fogg, who is a retired deputy, as marshall. i wanna get his opinion on it and see if he saw the same sort of trial that you thought of. he was happy with how the prosecutor's actually handled the case. yeah, actually i think they put on a good, a good prosecution. the bottom line is, you know, you gotta gotta walk and look place with a good what is it attention where i don't have all of those facts. and we just know

that when the prosecutor verification of this nature, the bottom line is the you miss job and murder and he was any. he went out there, several people, 5 is weapon. he was not a police officer. he came or did his theme with an intention, nefarious intent. and so the bottom line is, i think they put together the case again, you thought and in political and i was once you start adding political stuff, instead of it afraid you change everything, whether or not this man came in. and as he took the law on his own hand became an added this, that he was going to do something with these people protest. they bought a gun. why do you bring a gun? placene, if you going to protest. so obviously there are things here that seem like the price due to present that the jury it out. i don't see how they can come whatever it is other than what this man did. well and matthew, dominic, you literally, your answers are almost completely opposite, but that's exactly what we're saying right now, which makes me think that this is a powder keg and can osha right now. i want to get the last current. i'm fortunate

can we're going to because sure, but matthew, one last question to you. so you completely, you disagree with this. i did this with self defense that he brought the gun on the basis there were, there was obviously out of control riding going on. there was looting going on, he thought that he was going to protect land that might, he never visited. and so they came after him. so you're, you're totally decision. this idea that it was self defense. absolutely. let me again when you, when you're talking about going into scene of this nature and bringing a weapon, you are trying to be to police. the bottom line is you let the law enforcement handle the duties. and each coming in there. now he's got his weapon, you've got no uniform or no bad that nothing. of course you're going to have people that are afraid and then you actually find browse. is that a grounded find it? the person is reckless all the way around. when you look at all of this, but bottom line is the jury heard it all hopefully to prosecute a present on his evidence. and a jury, you know, they have family members,

they know folks that are coming to the city. so hopefully they're going to, you know, make the right decision. well, dominic matthew, we're going to have is coming probably and then probably tomorrow when the jury verdict come down, continued. thank you so much for joining us. have you ever been sitting around with your friends talking about a particular subject only defined targeted ads on your social media about that very topic, a short time later with archie correspondence, has your sweet explains, while big tech may deny this very claim, other technology experts say the tech might show otherwise. taking many of us by storm, most smartphone users tend to carry their phones everywhere and it's a common site to see these iphones or androids lying around during most conversations. but when social media reflect topics that we're just discussed, is it just indicative of one's online behavior, or is big tech actually listening to your conversations? and it's not even possible. i think that we all have our own subjective anecdotal

evidence as of one of to many of those coincidences that make us question brian more into marketing officer, a 1st more action off angelus. they start at provide artificial intelligence powered customer service for large brands. they focus on conversational ai, which according to more and has evolved tremendously in the past decade more and says their technology searches for words or phrases. many times the hardware is listening for a reported wake word and an ad platform has even more power. is the technical voracity there for it to handle, and the answer to that is absolutely resolving. yes, it the technical capabilities are there. peter philip, who works as a technology and security consultant agrees. the technology is more than capable of capturing conversations for targeted ads, but he says most users give these apps permission, owns themselves are very secure and until you give the right away to those apps, right? and sometimes it's, it's, you know, pretty black and white either and you opt in or you don't. correct?

yes. and, but that often portion is often buried in a 100 pages of the legal speak. philip says many times people don't realize they're giving these apps the green light to use their microphone record their screens or view their browsing history. it's all in the fine print, many of us blindly accept when downloading an app. so there's been a couple of universities, but northeastern university did a study of 8000 apps in the google app store. and they found that there are, there is no app maliciously or without permission recording your conversations and using those. so yes, phones are doing that, but not necessarily surreptitious way that is completely unauthorized by the user is confusing because, you know, facebook has come out publicly to say that they are using the microphones for targeted as yet. there are so many coincidences of people experiencing, you know,

just having private conversations with people in a room with their smartphone nearby. and they suddenly start seeing ads for whatever it is that they're talking about, or those type of as usually you have requested at some point, access to your, to your microphone. and they do record and they are listening. the people on the forefront of a i is privacy, something that they're even discussing at this point. well, so privacy is in conflict with what marketers are trying to do. so what marketers are trying to do is to tailor to the very best of their ability to personalize hyper personalize in. yeah, that would be coming your way. and so there is absolutely friction between ethics and then what would otherwise be the desire of, of an ad platform. in these ad platforms, they make their money by people clicking out. so won't big tech continue to deny. utilizing one microphone for targeted ads, taking a look at your studies may give you and your friends

a little privacy. phillips says when looking to change your settings, examine the apps that have access to your microphone and camera. many times they request location access as well. and if you want to keep your information private, philip suggest turning off that access altogether. reporting from los angeles and cautious suite, r t lots are going on in the world today. please stay tuned to r t and rti america as we watched developments that are going on in kenosha and waiting for the jury to come back with their verdict. because that's all we have for today. so all the time, make sure that you follow me on twitter at scottie and use the hash tag team and vh . we'll continue this conversation and for this show and more download portable got to be app for your apple or android device. like always. and thanks for watching, we'll catch with

and he really is no thing. they can't ride on police report. it's an all cash in december 2020, a group of anti fascist, fill out a film crew access for 3 months. so like if people organization, if an idea that it must be a channel out the gate while they may come with their faces. but they can say what they believe in. we believe in helping our community. we believe that fascism is one of the major threats to the united states has gotten reuben, this is a chance to see who and t for really are in order for me to extract my 1st amendment right and say that my life matter have to be on to the teacher that that's all american. we can't trust the police. we can't trust the government. we can't trust anyone except ourselves to protect ourselves in

when there are problems like the energy crisis, europe, illegal immigration on poland border or even when the wrong political party or politician winds. there is a culprit, always waiting in the wings. and that's russia. scapegoating. russia is excuse used by failing western elite or new york. it's really what america's about ah, when our mayor took our place, he was elected because of his campaign on our city, being a tale of 2 cities, the halves and i have not. and those who have not are usually the ones who wind up being buried on holiday. the city is always wanted to forget about hold island. city is wanted to forget about the people who are buried there. wanted to forget about the fact that there is a potter's field that there was

a place where difficult stories are hidden. the fact that we're using inmates to maintain this active burial site, where 1000000 souls are buried, where so much of new york city history is buried, is document of the inequality that has existed in this city. for centuries. ah, a both the headlines here were not the international. the e u says it will use all tools at his disposal to stop the migrant in flux into poland . that's as a polish border guards fired tear gas and water cannon at the refugees, much to the anger of fellow roofs. a shop divide emerges over opponents tactics with france slamming plans to build a massive border wall. in the program,

we looked at the tough line being taken against the people crossing from bella ross, while a migrant votes freely crossing the mediterranean. also in the program, germany considered as imposing drastic cobra rules on the unvaccinated, joining a growing list of countries to do so. as the government struggles to coordinate its con, demik responded to mit up power transition.