because they want to and nessa frank and i dad saw it from a theoretical plan to do. i had locked it is a very the radical point of view because he's trying not answer the question why, why is society allowing this type of a suffering that death is preferable to care? this is, this is the essential question that comes down to this because what you're actually saying is we should change the law to allow doctors and nurses to do homicide because that's what it is. we're talking about euthanasia, which is done by lethal injection by somebody else, and they're approving it and then they're doing it. so you're talking about actually a type of a homicide. and is it ever a good idea in the culture to allow someone to have the right a law to kill me? and we have a choice individual choice as k. what we should be dealing with is the should be strength protocols in place. so no nurse has to explain to someone in the final phase of m and day, why they should speed up the process of that death. the trial that's gripping america in focus next on news views, tuesday, post finance,

and plenty more. besides, after the shortest when there are problems like the energy crisis, europe's illegal immigration on poland border or even when the wrong political party or politician wins. there is a culprit, always waiting in the wings, and that's russia. scapegoating. russia is the excuse used by failing western leads . ah

ah, ah, all eyes are always content, not only for the jury verdict on the written house trial, but also the public reaction. we will have our law enforcement panel discussed, and i don't know the nickname, sleepy joe can be applied to president biden after his life, even conversation. the president chief, which lasted 3 and a half hours. while there were lots of talk of more cooperation between the 2 world superpowers, there was no break through on a key issues like taiwan trade in human rights. making. some ask are the 2 countries in the midst of a cold war? and we have all had at that moment when we've been in conversation with others in person and magically the next time we checked our phone, an ad popped up related to what exactly we were talking about. some i find this convenient. others might find it creepy. we will dive into the technology involved

as well as why this invasion of privacy is legal. i'm scared to use. we're going to give you the 360 view of these stories on today's news views right here on our t america. ah, we start today off with the latest on the virtual meeting between president biden and chinese president, she, jim pink at the talks were expected to be centered around the future of taiwan. but the morning after china's foreign minister now says the bite ministration admit does not support an independent toe on and will respect the one china policy whom best co host an investigative journalist, been sworn reports. according to the chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, president joe biden admitted that the united states is here to the one china policy and does not support taiwanese independence during money nights,

virtual meeting with president jim bean, she's going to, as you voucher during the meeting, president biden admitted again, that the united states and here to the one china policy and does not support the taiwanese independence, didn't go. as we reported, china has increasingly stepped up military aggression toward taiwan over the past few weeks and months, including over 100 military incursions into ty, one's airspace. recently. that was the backdrop for monday's meeting between president biden and present g. yeah. during the opening of the virtual settlement recounted stories from their time travelling with each other. sometimes quoting each other's words from that arrow. as i said before, or seems to me our responsibility as leaders of china in states to ensure that the competition between our countries does not vary into conflict. whether a 10 year unintended, simple, straightforward competition, unclear as the world's to biggest economy and permanent members of the un security council, china and the u. s. should strengthen communication and cooperation. we should not

take care of our own domestic affairs, but also assume our lu, international responsibility to jointly promote the noble cause of peace and development of mankind before the meeting began. present inviting suggested that he would reference new guard rails on the issue of taiwan and well bite indeed reference concerns about chinese behavior that threatened stability in the taiwan straits. he never did said any of those new guard rails referenced the started the talks, which leaves a series of questions about how china will proceed in its aggression toward taiwan . for news use hughes. i'm been swan, there is a questions that we're gonna try to get some answers from and we ran steve gail, a former official in the u. s. a trade representative's office. steve. i want to get to this double figure in a 2nd bill. i want to start off though, with this friendship it seems happening between president she and president bind and you know, president by an initially earlier in the day and said, nope, we're not old friends. and i thought it was funny because i'm president chief 1st

got i said, hey, old friend, it was like he was watching and he went to kind of already go to that as well as the timeframe a pm in america, yet am in china. so, i mean, he was more of an advantage on that when you know that was a big criticism though, the president trump had it was that he was too cozy with dick there's, i'm friends. yesterday it's conversation seemed like a cozy and friends, yet, are we seeing any criticism of the events yesterday and how the to actually handle each other? well, we certainly didn't hear any questions in the whole 3 hour meeting about it in china's responsibility for that. i was also taken by the, the, my good friend intro that present she came with because you just had just back you claiming that the president and presidency are not good friends. you have the president himself say we are not good friends. and then president, she opens it up the president, she's been studying the trump troll book on how to troll people and intentionally with that's just a mess with joe biden and show that he's. he's playing games at his head and living in his head like donald trump as well. but didn't you go to actually,

what was said there, and i have to tell you, i'm a little bit confused. because here you have the form restrict crop, say, and said no president by degrees that taiwan one, china, we're all together. that's exactly opposite though, from what you're hearing here in america. this idea of rushing out the china is going to be won. what is the united states going to do about it? we actually hurt our friendship with france, making sure that we sold say we sold some marines to australia with this idea of national if it national security. if china and taiwan, i'm hearing a lot of double speak right now. what is the truth and this, or it is by did not even know i don't think by knows, more importantly, i don't think the by the administration has a clue what they're doing. keep in mind that the one china policy has been played out in how the chinese have treated hong kong. there were supposed to be almost a 2 china separation. so that hong kong could operate with democratic principles and with a free market system that has been crushed without any real pushback by the united states. so the chinese have seen that they could walk all over hong kong,

impose their will on hong kong, started arresting people who speak out against the government of china in hong kong . and the united states and the rest of the world didn't lift a finger. they are now being very aggressive in their stance toward taiwan. and we should be very concerned about that as are the south koreans, as our japan, australia, the entire pacific coast. because china is being very aggressive and the u. s. administration, under bible is not doing anything to push back in any measurable way. well, that's all thing. yeah. we are hearing reports, see that there's actually u. s. troops overtraining in training, taiwanese army, they're over there. actually training right now. they're obviously in south korea, you know, say on one hand, you're hearing this idea that, oh yes, the u. s. is gonna back up tiwana, china invades. and then you've been telling, this is very dangerous to me because you're getting 2 different makers and all they know today then media is not covering that the media is not se, nope, according to the chinese minister, they yes, bite and told them that if we made taiwan,

they're not gonna do anything about it. that's exactly opposite of the rhetoric that we're hearing out of the media out of this white house here at home. do they not think people talk to each other? well, and keep in mind that we got into the 1st gulf war when you had the administration basically say to a brand, we don't, we don't mind if you invade kuwait or erect, we don't, might have to invade kuwait and they did because they were given the green light that the president has now, given china, essentially the green light to take action against taiwan and they are watching very closely as the u. s. doesn't do anything around the world to, to kind of step up in the face of these kinds of aggressive pastors, whether it's by i said in the ukraine, whether it's by china and what they did in hong kong and our, our focusing on ty wants keep in mind that internally china, the china has very difficult financial situations. their manufacturing is on the slide, their, their growth is on the slide. china is essentially a 3rd world country outside of their major cities like hong kong gong to beijing

and a few others. so there are serious economic problems with in china and the best way to hold your company or your country together, like a company under fire, if you then make aggressive postures against others. and this is what we've seen throughout history. when you go to war, that helps pull your people together. it helps overcome the economic distress within your country. and it is a dangerous situation that i don't think the by the administration recognizes, even in the smallest portion, 3 and a half hours, stay 3 and a half hours talk about very important issue. they did not discuss the nuclear arsenal. they did not discuss how to prevent future viruses like the chronic virus from coming out of their borders. and it looks like what they did was double speak and actually said, nope, china, we're gonna have to stay out of it. we support you doing whatever you need to do a tie one next time. maybe the president doesn't need to speak to them. i don't know. unfortunately what we did here was a lot of double fake. steve, always great to talk to you here at home. i'll either on connection with cons to not only for the jury verdict, but the public reaction,

we have more on the details from the ground after the break. mm hm. and the very so thing the cops right on police report on december 2020 a group of anti finishes, fill out a film crew access for 3 months. so like if people organization, it's an idea that fascism must be opposed, that you can't allow the game while they may kill that. but he says that they can see what they believe in. we believe in our community. we believe that our fascism is one of the major threats to united states has gotten reuben. this is a chance to see who and t for really are in order for me to extract my 1st amendment right and say that my life matters. i have to be on to the teacher that i've hallmark is we can't trust the police, we chance was the government. we can't trust anyone except ourselves to protect

ourselves in progress driven by dreamers shaped by frontier. so those with theirs sinks, we dare to ask a ah, the jury is deliberating in the trial of cal written house, the 8 year old,

who shot and killed 2 men. and we're going to 3rd, during the unrest in kenosha, wisconsin, my summer. that's where our teacher, john had he had actually lived with the latest. john, thank you so much for joining me. you know, is the jury expecting to possibly reach a verdict when well that's, that's the big question isn't. have a jury has been deliberating. so right around 10 am this morning, scotty. so we're going, you know, it's a little past 4 o'clock now an hour behind you on the east coast. so now the better part of 56 hours, whether they'll reach a verdict tonight or whether the deliberations will continue tomorrow, whether they'll recess or that will tough it out and go into the night out that are that that's one among many questions. at this point, the jury at 12616 men, women were pick from a full of 18. and earlier today actually avail up where the tumbler went over to pile rittenhouse, the defendant, and it was written how's, who actually pull the numbers out of the 6 alternate will be standing by and that's

how they got down to that number 12. it's not unusual for that kind of like lottery drawing to happen as far as you know, pulling the 12 jurors. what was very unusual, that was that written house did it, and that was by instruction in order from the judge in the case judge brew schrader now during the deliberations earlier today. this is one significant point. i should mention. the jury asked the judge for extra copies of the jury instructions, specifically pages one through 6 having to do with self defense and also with provocation guidelines and also for crimes with intent to kill. so the jury was asking for extra copy of the jury instructions, and you know, that's all part of you know, when the jury has a question, the question is submitted to the judge. and then the judge, you know, gives the jury what it's, what it's asking for. written house is charged with 5 felony counts. let me go through these counts quickly for you. the top one is 1st agree, reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon. now this is connected along with cal to,

to the jeff death of joseph rosenbaum. the 1st man that written how shot and killed count 2 is 1st degree recklessly endangerment, endangering safety for the use of a dangerous weapon. account 3, 1st degree, recklessly endangering safety. use of a dangerous weapon and count for 1st degree intentional homicide. use of a dangerous weapon. both of these towns are connected to the 2nd man that co written has shot and killed anthony hubert count 5 attempt at 1st degree intentional homicide. use of the dangerous weapon is connected to the 5th man that car rittenhouse shot and badly injured, but that person did survive his wounds, though they were very serious. excuse me, was now the judge in this case. as i mentioned bruce schrader, he dismissed 2 other counts from 6 and 7 count 6. this will sound technicality. it had to deal with the barrel length of the a r 15 style rifle that rittenhouse was using. that he was carrying i so that was

dismissed on a technicality, an account set and had to do with a courtesy violation the both of those were thrown out before the actual before the jury began its deliberations. the trial has been dramatic at times, as we've seen, over the course of the days that it was held. there are firey exchanges between judge raider and between the lead prosecutor and the case. thomas banner, while with schraner getting really angry at being a who's trying to basically bring up some evidence. that trader already said wasn't going to be using some testimony that was not going to be a good trial with rittenhouse breaking down when he took the stand. breaking down, getting very emotional on stan and, and obviously the dramatic footage that was his and particularly a closing argument. it's the video of rosenbaum after the shot being laid on the ground, his eyes basically rolling in the back of his head as he was dying. so the really

graphic and gruesome video that was showed live 9 only to the jurors, not only to the courtroom that was also broadcast, live on tv during the ongoing coverage. so that was incredibly dramatic. the governor of wisconsin and tony evers has activated on stand by 500 national guard troops to assist local law enforcement. if a verdict is reached. if there is any potential violence or unrest at this point, scottie, it has remain pretty quiet. there's about my, my camp is about 2 dozen, maybe 3 dozen protesters that have been here on the courthouse steps throughout the day, calling for justice for the victim, for the base of the victim. for the 3 men that were shot, the 2 men fatally the one who was badly injured. um, you know, so again, the question is, when will we have a verdict? will the jury recess for the night? will it continue into the evening before possibly recessing for tomorrow? i guess again those, those are among many of the questions, but at this point there is a law enforcement presence, not

a huge lot more since present, but it doesn't look like there's going to be any. it doesn't seem like anything is throwing at this moment, but again, you know, all eyes are on the court house on what happens with his jury. if a verdict is rich and when that is handed down, scott said a disguise. that's brand, dominic, he's a retired police officer. you know dominic, there are a lot of he did emotions in this case. could this just be the calm before the storm? all the typical, quiet mob before the start of my before the storm stuff. i don't, i don't even know what the, the, the mob wants at this point. i don't know how much more they're going to be just this. oh, outrage of we want a verdict going at our decision. and i think america is so tired of this cry, baby outrage from these activists. you're not going to get any type of fair trials . you're not going to get any type of will. yoga, hopefully you will get

a fair verdict. this trial was getting to watch from start to finish. but at this point, you know what, what's the point of what this mob is doing in these activists in these protests? are they gonna just gonna create a number? can osha riot that's going to bring out another kyle written house. so this cycles just never going to and, and i'm, this is about an hour from my house. i'm getting tired of this stuff and it's just getting real old. and that's the frustration on this, and some people are right now i'm voicing their anger at the prosecution. they feel like the prosecutor was very weak and the job that they did. how did you view? you said it was now jane to watch different points. you know, you had to just kind of cringe. but did you think they did a good job trying to actually prove to the jury their goal that rittenhouse did not act in self defense, but actually he murdered 2 people and that was his intent the whole time. no, the prosecution was abysmal. and i, i made a statement yesterday saying if anybody's ever thinking about getting in a law enforcement watched the prosecution and thomas pinger from the case. and you will know that if you ever became a cop in kenosha county, you're, you're, you're going to be screwed because this man is gonna just rip up all your works.

the one great thing and, and again, this goes back in a black lives matter. this goes back in an activist when you have what people are seeing as unfair trial, the one thing that people really have to start understanding is that the district attorneys are states attorneys depending upon your state. they work with the police and police. i don't know what the conversation was when rittenhouse was arrested, but police to make a suggestion a, this is all the facts. this is the evidence. this is what our suggestion is. and it's up to the states or the district attorney to make a decision whether or not they are a prosecutor. it's honestly my thoughts that long for some presented all of their information. evidence to of the prosecution said, hey, we're just not dealing with this because they don't want to be held liable. prosecution just got the all we, we have to make this a political case and they, i don't know how to describe it. it made no sense watching him for this honest and tell you what the totality of, of what i got on the, on the canal show prosecutor's offices, is if you're a female,

god forbid. and you go out to a bar. and you are just taken advantage of and raped the prosecution is going to ask what you did to your attacker to instigate it. that's exactly how he came across and his whole prosecution. and it just made no sense to me. well, i remember you matthew fogg, who is a retired deputy or as marshall, i wanna get his opinion on it and see if he saw the same sort of trial that you thought of. he was happy with how the prosecutor's actually handled the case. yeah, i mean, actually i think they've put on a good fit me a good prosecution. the bottom line is, you know, you gotta gotta walk and look place with a good. what is it attention, where i don't have all of those facts and we just know that when the prosecutor verification of this nature, the bottom line is the job and murder and he was any. he went out there, several people, 5 is weapon. he was not a police officer, he came on to the scene with an intention, nefarious, and just and so the bottom line is, i think they put together the case and just again you thought and in political. and

i was, once you start adding political stuff, instead of it afraid you change everything, whether or not this man came in. and as he took the law on his own hand became an added this, that he was going to do something with these were protesting. he bought a gun. why do you bring a gun? placene, and you're going to approach that. so obviously there are things here that seem like the process due to present that the jury out. i'll see how they can come whatever it is other than what this man did. while matthew, dominic, you, literally, your answers are almost completely opposite, but that's exactly what we're saying right now, which makes me think that this is a powder keg in canada right now. i want to get the last current. i'm fortunate can we're going to kind of shore. but matthew, one last question to you. so you completely, you disagree with this? i did. this was self defense that he brought the gun on the basis there were, there was obviously out of control riding going on there was looting going on. he thought that he was going to, you know, protect land that might, he never visited. and so they came after him, so you're,

you're totally desist in this idea that it was self defense. absolutely. let me again when you, when you're talking about going into scene of this nature and bringing a weapon, you are trying to be to police. the bottom line is you let the law enforcement handle the duties. and each coming in there. now you jack his weapon, you've got no uniform or no bad that nothing. of course you're going to have people that don't be afraid. and then you actually find browse. is that a grounded find it that person maybe just reckless all the way around when you look at all of this. but bottom line is, the jury heard it all hopefully to prosecute a present on his evidence. and a jury, you know, they have family members, they know folks that are coming to des moines and so hopefully they're going to, you know, make the right decision, you know, well dominate, matthew, we're going to have is cumbersome probably. and then probably tomorrow, when the jury verdict comes down, continued. thank you so much for joining us. have you ever been sitting around with your friends talking about a particular subject, only defined targeted ad on your social media about that very topic,

a short term later. whether it's correspondence has your sweet explained, while big tech may deny this very claim, other technology experts say the tech might show otherwise. all smartphones make it easier to connect with loved ones and provide information at your fingertips. the trade off for many is privacy. and as this trust forbid to continue to skyrocket throughout much of the country, some question whether some social media companies were being genuine or not when denying they use a smartphones microphone for targeted ads. we wanted to dig a little deeper into the technology standpoint to see if targeted out was a mere coincidence or a grant marketing scheme taken many of us by storm. most smartphone users tend to carry their phones everywhere and it's a common sight to see these iphones or androids lying around during most conversations. but when social media reflect topics that we're just discussed, is it just indicative of one's online behavior,

or is big tech actually listening to your conversations? and it's not even possible. i think that we all have our own subjective, anecdotal evidence as of one of to many of those coincidences that make us question brian more into marketing officer 1st more action off. angelus based startup provides artificial intelligence powered customer service for large brands. they focus on conversational ai, which according to more and has evolved tremendously in the past decade more and says their technology searches for words or phrases. many times the hardware is listening for a reported wake word and an ad platform has even more power. is the technical voracity there for it to handle? and the answer to that is absolutely resulting. yes, it technical capabilities are there. peter philip, who works as a technology and security consultant, agree for technology, is more than capable of capturing conversations for targeted ads. but he says, most users give these apps permission, owns themselves, are very secure,

and until you give the rights away to those apps, right. and sometimes it's, it's, you know, pretty black and white either you opt in or you don't, correct? yes. and, but that often portion is often buried in a 100 pages of legal speak. philip says many times people don't realize they're giving these app the green light to use their microphone record their screens or view their browsing history. it's all in the fine print, many of us blindly accept when downloading an app. so there's been a couple of universities like northeastern university get a study of 8000 apps in the google app store. and they found that there are, there is no app maliciously or without permission recording your conversations and using those. so yes, phones are doing that, but not necessarily surreptitious way that is completely unauthorized by the user is confusing because, you know, facebook has come out publicly to say that they are using the microphones for

targeted as yet. there are so many coincidences of people experiencing, you know, just having private conversations with people in a room with their smartphone nearby. and they suddenly start seeing ads for whatever it is that they're talking about, or those type of as usually you have requested at some point, access to your, to your microphone. and they do record and they are listening. the people on the forefront of a i is privacy, something that they're even discussing at this point. well, so privacy is in conflict with what marketers are trying to do. so what marketers are trying to do is to tailor to the very best of their ability to personalize hyper personalize in. yeah, that would be coming your way. and so there is absolutely friction between ethics and then what would otherwise be the desire of, of an ad platform. in these ad platforms, they make their money by people clicking out. so won't big tech continue to deny.

utilizing one's microphone for targeted ads, taking a look at your studies may give you and your friends a little privacy. phillips says when looking to change your settings, examine the apps that have access to your microphone and camera. many times they request location access as well. and if you want to keep your information private, philip suggest turning off that access altogether. reporting from los angeles and cautious suite, r t lots are going on in the world today. please stay tuned to r t n r t america. as we watched developments that are going on in kenosha and waiting for the jury to come back with their verdict, because that's all we have for today, show all the time. make sure that you follow me on twitter at scottie and he's used the hash tag team and b h will continue this conversation. and for this show and more download affordable got to be at for your apple or android device. like always and thanks for watching. we'll catch up with

we're empowering ourselves to be more efficient or quicker with our transactions, but with that comes a trade off every device b as a potential entry point for security attack. any machine can be here. it's an extension of traditional time. the defenders have always been one step behind the attackers with columns option in the offering. it's not a matter of if it happens, it's a matter of went to join me every thursday on the alex simon, sure. and i'll be speaking to guess what the world politics sport business,

i'm show business. i'll see you then. ah, breaking news this hour. turning off the top speller, roost temporarily. shouts an oil pipeline which runs from russia to poland and into the e. u. on schedule maintenance is the stated reason for the halt, but comes at a time of heightened tensions between mince and brussels. but all not issue the e, you say it will use all tools, outage disposal to stop the migrant and flux from belarus into poland. dots as polish border guards, fire tear gas on water coming up. refugees. a sharp divide emerges over poland tactics with france. slumming plans for a massive wall to be built on the border. we look at the tough line being taken.