it's remarkable. the smallest headlines this our washington wins is appeal against the ruling blocking junior sanchez expedition to the united states. his case may now return to a lower court to be reheard. please speak with the wiki leeks editor in chief. this is not a case that is being fought on the bay, sophomore. this is an absolute trouble. steel. any legal process. this case is called hypocritical with russia noting it comes as britain takes part in a democracy summit that harold's the west supposed freedom of the press, and a provocative and threatening action brushes, slams ukraine for attempting to dangerously approach its maritime borders. nay, crimea taking tensions between the 2 states to a new level, we get reaction from residence on the peninsula. this was blatant provocation. they wanted to paint russia is guilty. they always blame russia for everything. postpone

is senseless. they are likely doing it on purpose to anger, russia. all the sheeps of the jazz is just and pleasant to play, provoke the ball. ah, i good afternoon, 5 o'clock in moscow, you're watching artie international now. we're start with breaking usa from the u. k. because a london court has ruled that wiki league's founder julian assange can be extradited to the united states. washington one, it's appeal against the previous ruling that brought to san from being sent to america to face trial on espionage charges. his partner described the decision as a grave miscarriage, of justice. julian exposed the crimes of caea tortures of ca killers, and now we know that those ca killers were planning to kill him to. how can this court?

how can these courts approve an extradition request? under these conditions, well, june, the phone just now are step closer to being expedited to the united states. as the u. k. high court has decided that it will be overturning a decision not to extradite him to the united states. that decision was based back in january on medical grounds at the time the judge said it would be oppressive. a student decides that a high risk of suicide, of course, back in october, that was a 2 day harry, i was the united states trying to appeal over numerous grounds, including the fact that it offered an unprecedented package of assurances. as i saw, it would not be held under the maximum security the strictest maxim security conditions in prison, and that he isn't unwell this thing he's made out of continue to say that he is indeed after suicide risk. and that all of these assurances are

meaningless and vague as they put it. they said that the united states can reverse any decision. not any point. class is also concerned about the trustworthiness of america has got routines to pointing to one of those reports in the, in the cia i had talked to kidnap during the saw and put it to kill them and even was spying and bugging him during his time at london's ecuadorian embassy now june a song just noise. what they say is this is ample enough. evidence to not only throw out the court case entirely, but they say it's a 100 percent politically motivated. plus, think of cause auggie that you're in the sun should be walking free. this is perfectly reasonable to find its oppressive to extradite immensely disordered person because he's extradition is likely to result in his death. our court must be able to use its power to protect people from extradition, to a foreign state where they have no control over what will be done to them. now the

united states hold you in the sand for what they deem as one of the largest compromises of classified information, the history of the united states. and if found guilty and convicted, he could be sent to prison for up to 175 years. that's because the us have indicted him on 18 counts under the espionage jacques for publishing. i pacified military documents all related to the war in iraq and afghanistan, but most crucially, i got included claims the minute tree even killed thousands of innocent civilians. now, speaking outside the high court here this morning, we've heard from stella morris the partner who is incredibly disappointed and she's saying why and how is this happening? how long can this really go on for? and many people have been supporting her outside here. many, many protests is that also are similar questions to who is a glimmer of hope that you know,

the british justice system might actually prevail for once. the british judiciary has assisted on every level the u. s. campaign to get a 10 years 10 years in the streets of london, public opinion and this sounds. but obviously the judge's decision is not on the side of public opinion. it's absolutely devastating, especially this time of year to another christmas without doing that is children without their data stay on the fight to free judy massage the trying so we will prevail eventually. well, interestingly or ironically today is international human rights day, and many people outside hi court say, where is the human rights? in the case of june, a saw obviously was did on the grounds of the royal court of justice that they call it the royal cause of injustice. and just as it was being announced,

a protest even through eggs at this side directly behind me, which just goes to show the sentiment in feeling here on the streets of london. she will give you some background to this case and 2900 sounds was forcefully removed by british police from the exploit embassy in london. after quito terminated his 7 year silence. he had sought refuge in the building following sexual assault allegations in sweden, which has now been dropped. america, well, we can find extradited on claims of conspiring to have government computers and publish classified material. in january this year, a british judge did rule against exercising him though to the u. s. t u to phase over his mental health, but also rejected his bail application claiming that he may flee. earlier i spoke with the wiki leaks editor in chief, christian huffington was actually on believable. and so i run a good decision should be 100 on the united nations human rights. the united states

had all opportunity in the madison court to make those so called us your and it did not. it simply press them forward. after the last in the madison court in january, the united states had given assurances that the they would to treat the julian fairly and he would get that treatment and be housed in an adequate to jail and could even server the new sentence if he gets one in australia, all of these so called assurance and have been and been investigated by human rights organizations such as amnesty international and found that the us you are. and so some of the work and paper they're written on. they are simply not reliable . we are dealing here with a nation where individuals on the top level in the junior, the top level of the cia and in the white house contemplated, kidnapping were killing julian assaults. this is not

a case that is being fought on the basis of the more this is an absolutely try to steal any legal process. this is a political case, and the julian arrest us we have said for many, many years is a political persecution. while the u. s has been pursuing assange after he prevailed, classified information on american military activities during was in afghanistan, and also iraq. ah ah ah ah ah

ah ah, ah, a more rushes for a ministry has slammed the course 3rd, it's highlighting that it coincides with the end of a summit for democracy hosted by the united states. this shameful verdict, in a political case against a journalistic and public figure is another manifestation of the cannibalistic world view of the anglo saxon tandem. the west marsh, international human rights day, and the end of the summit for democracy with dignity. this news is devastating. the persecution of julian sanchez, the disgrace. meanwhile, biden is holding his cynical democracy summit and the hypocrisy and the cruelty. we condemned today's u. k. high court decision to allow the expedition of julius on to the us, which will prove historic for all the wrong reasons. we fully believe that julian

assigned has been targeted for his contributions to journalism, where we spoke to at j political on this patrick henderson to get his views. he says that the west does think it's rhetoric on democracy and freedom of speech only applies to other countries. they like talking about journalism, they like talking about media freedom or they like to impose it on various other developing countries. target nations. nations singled out for regime change, but when it comes to actually living up to those sort of things at home, the rhetoric doesn't actually match or the reality. and i think julia sanders case is a huge embarrassment on that level. so then it goes incumbent on the establishment, the mainstream media, the political powers, to collude together or to ignore this case and to deny the fact that to julia sarge, as a journalist of wiki lakes is in fact a press outlet doing a public service. so that's more or less how they closed ranks on that on that

story. only mar classified documents have been laid to bear sharing heavy us broke diplomatic assurances in another extradition case. similar though to that which julian assange does now face a david mendoza was expedited by madrid to america on condition he be allowed to serve his sentence in spain and signed a document with and with the american and spanish governments. assuring him of this condition. but the united states held him in a u. s. jail for almost 7 years before. eventually returning him. annie, after he took legal action against america, we spoke to independent journalist richard met hurst to release the documents in the case. you know, they've told us on that he can serve at any potential sentence in his home country australia. they said the exact same thing to mendoza. they told him just just let him come to the us and he can serve any sentence given back in spain. in mendoza's

case, the united states signed a contract, an explicit contract with mendoza, and with spain saying that he must be returned to spain. he cannot be given a life sentence, he kind of tried for conscience structuring. they violated this, the u. s. kept him for 6 years and 9 months. the only reason mendoza was allowed to go back to spain is because he sued spain twice in the spanish supreme court. and he won and spain threatened to cut off the extradition treaty with the us. that is when the u. s. felt pressure, they wanted to keep extra dining people from spain. and so it's only because this was imperiled and in danger of being cancelled that they then sent him back. mendoza was was expedited for drug trafficking and money laundering. and he told me, if they did that to him, if the united states did that to mendoza, what are they going to do to julian thought. this is a common practice. the united states violates its assurances, its diplomatic agreements, whether it's iran nuclear deal, whether it's, you know, a prison transfer assurances for a saundra window that they're going to violate the mark my words. this is going to happen. mendoza is certain of this, and i interviewed him for this and he's seen dozens of people from spain,

from columbia, from mexico, from all over the world, who've been given assurances. and once they get to the us, it's violated these documents that i published. they weren't seen by the court yet . they weren't submitted in court. and i'm convinced that if the judge had seen them, if the judge's study of these documents, they could not let the extra sure go ahead because they've accepted that a song just suicidal. they've accepted the judge, apply the test correctly, that he would be even more suicidal. he would, he would drive an extradition to deal with, drive him to take what makes up that all this. so the only reason they allow the appeal to go ahead today was that the judge should have allowed us to give assurances before and that they trust the u. s. assurances, well, i'm very sorry, but these classified documents say otherwise what you say we're going to take a quick break munoz from us in 10 minutes. ah, ah, so we've talked about the rising chance of civil war and america. and it could either be between the have yachts and the have nots. they could be between the big coin

states like texas or florida between the non bitcoin states. but the rising tension is comparable because the rising genie coefficient as is now and they spread between the very top and the and the bottom is getting extremely wide awe many was full, the delta would be the sort of p i did. i could, well, you're not going to get a car. sure. any more transmissible than delta and not what's happened. you got something which is popped up with more than 30 changes in that spike protein that we're all interested. it's accumulated, all the mutations we've seen in different varies all in one bar. and that raises some very interesting issues about where did he come from in the 1st place. is it possible to get even more mute and what's gonna happen in terms of disease severity and vaccine protection? so it is suggesting though no divorce has still got some way to go proximal

surprises. ah, welcome back. now the ukranian naval vessel approached rushing waters and crimea has been described as a continuation of native provocations in the black sea by a russian regional official ukrainian ship named the dumbass sailed dangerously close to rushing waters on thursday evening reporting from crimea. his artesia, chap of oliver branches that fits the household of occasion. the threat for marie craig and navy ship heading towards the coach trade in crimea, as the collision between the russian and ukrainian fleets in decline. the encouraged trade have me avoided. it happens when the ukrainian ship quotes, don't fuss, have been moving tools. russian territorial horses stop said kilometers from the

border and then turned back. according to the f. v. the incident started on december the 9th at 12 minutes past 9 in the morning when the ukrainian ship called don't boss left the port of north pole and began to move towards the coast trade. according to the russians side, it hadn't received any request for passage as required by russian legislation. let's take listen to what the f as we have to say, the command ship don't bus has reversed course away from the coach straight. it is not responding to enquiries. the extra, so the grant and ship's crew are regarded as provocative and endangering navigational safety. while the ukranian side reported that the ship to no plan to pass for this trade. and it was on, on saving in the sea of us off towards the coast trade. and later throughout the day started to return, the continued not to respond to requests from the russian, oregon. according to the efforts be, the russian special service regarded the actions of the crew as provocative and threatening the safety of navigation. in turn,

the ukrainian side said it did no end to the sensitive. so it was before we tossed in its territorial horses and also that began returning to the bay also according to the ukrainian friends minutes that they don't bought ship in the sea over so legally, since it was a shed water area. and he expressed his surprise rather than most so a threat from an armed session rescue vessel. apart from that, on december, the 9th, which is yesterday, russian flight is escorted to flight us and french miniature air croft over the black sea. according to the russian national defense and will center this yes, and they will incident in the block c o the crime in peninsula on june the 20 said so, russian demonstrated a keesing, the u. k. u s. military aphasia, a complex publication, the richest warship, a tremendous defense, sales near the coast of crime in as well as ukrainian ships previously violated russian borders. crimean officials express consent and should be us here to counsel,

to discuss the problem that can lead to a wide spread confrontation. so we are here for the development in coaching right now, and we'll bring you more information as we get. okay, what is a map showing the powerful ukrainian ship? it was traveling from a port and the training city of mario po, russian security services, say the vessel, vang carrying within 33 kilometers of rushes. coach straight. we got reaction from the residence of the city of she lives by the strike at the youngest of provoke gods. this is blatant provocation of it was intended to show that as biden's lensky spoke. russia was restricting passage for ukrainian ships through the straits. i am confident that there was a tv crumbled ready to film and record it all as it happened. they wanted to paint russia is guilty. they always blame russia for everything and still night i'm going to be so strong you deal with the senseless. well, the words that ukraine would continue with the provocation,

and they're likely doing it on purpose to inc, russia, all the sheets of the jets is just unpleasant. when provoked people see you. yes, i'm a piece with russia. so for example, you have told me to, and i say that won't be of all, what is the story there unfolded last night? we got the views done mcadams, he's an executive director at the rome pul piece since the chief. and he said that the incident did appear to be a provocation by the train, the military. well, i'm sure that a ship called don bass just coincidentally, happened to test russian resolve near the, near the bridge. i think it was definitely a provocation. we've seen in the media over the past couple of weeks, particularly here in the united states, a lot of coverage about how russia is massing its troops inside of russia. and somehow that's a threat. russia has gone as your viewers well, no, to this point is saying yes, you can go through. you can go through the straight, but you do have to file in advance. and that's certainly according to, in accordance with international law,

the last person to congratulate president by but i think he's trying to walk it back. i think he's looking for a way out of this. you know, that's the case. he should be applauded for trying to do this for telling the landscape, hey, why don't you look at the mens agreement and try to go a little bit further towards fulfilling these obligations you've taken on? well, the united states, i did say on to say that 30 champlin anti tank myself systems were delivered to ukraine. back in october, more castillo takes a while to look now, the ukraine tensions and the situation on the ground in the country. the escalation, both rhetorically. we would, we have seen this hysteria reach fever pitch about the situation over ukraine, about potential plans to invade us. some countries say, but the situation on the ground in ukraine is perhaps, worst of all because that is where people are dying. people are dying. people are suffering. people are going through through al and have been going through hell for

many years that we have, we have seen of the united states, specifically pumping weapons into ukraine for the ukrainian military. and these are weapons b, b, b, they a javelin miss. are supplied by the united states or by dr. drones supplied by turkey. these are, these are weapons that are flowing into create and immediately going to the conflicts of where the civil war is being fought and the east of ukraine. and they are making life horrific for the people that ukraine has boosted about how it is used all it's, it's shiny new toys. unfortunately, the people on the receiving end very often are civilians. there are more than 2000000 civilians are trapped in the conflict zone in east than ukraine. and they're just having to break it out. people going to sending their kids to school. they will have to worry about a tang cello, a mortar, round landing. they're on the grounds of the school babs in the classroom where the

kids are. people going to work must always worry about tang grounds flying into the bus. they're in the public transport, deliver the car into the house. vladimir putin is like and what is happening to a war cry versus she i should say the rooster phobias, the 1st step towards genocide. what's going on and on bass now very much resembles genocide. we see it and we know about it, or we hear about is this potential plans emanating from the she i of the white house, the british government. these plan is that no one previously knew about that russia was planning to invade. a huge area of ukraine does unclear how they would be able to achieve this with, with, even if we believe the see i and others with, with such a small force, a $100000.00 troops as a very unlikely scenario. nevertheless, that's speculation. at this point, they themselves have said that russia hasn't made the decision to invade or ukraine

. but let's look at what is happening again on the graph. do you have the os c that reporting on c's for violation? so their work is constant and round the clock. ukrainian artillery enforces destroyed or damaged 5 times more civilian infrastructure at schools. that's workplace as that is people's homes. 5 times more infrastructure was destroyed and damaged by ukrainian forces, the vice versa. you also have the situation in which you, ukraine, still still 6 years on, refuses to negotiate with the break away republic saying that this isn't something we're going to do because if we talk to them face to face, that would be tantamount to acknowledging them. aside from that, there are also all manner of promises and assurances that ukraine keeps on hearing from, from britain, from the united states that they've got their back, that thou help them, that they'll keep the russians away. and what i,

what that does is it emboldens you credit. and unfortunately, the situation is such that aside from very one sided coverage, you have a situation in which piece simply isn't desirable. ms. edward castillo there, say that brings you up to date and forget. never thought a website for his stories take in finite an article ah back breaking toil forced labor stress industrial injury

corporal punishment. oh no. words with which we're all familiar. are you certain that the world you live in abolish slavery, long ago? joined me every thursday on the alex simon, sure. i'll be speaking to guess in the world of politics, sport, business, i'm show business. i'll see you then scientific knowledge has never been so readily available to everyone across the globe, but overwhelmed by information. how can we distinguish the real science from the

one being imposed upon us? we're living in a world where there are many people who have a vested interest in finding information, finding scientific evidence, and discrediting even the notion that science could provide the truth about the natural world in the pursuit of business goals. large corporations are challenged strongly by scientific evidence. if you're emotionally invested and free markets, then climate change is a serious emotional threat because dealing with it means we have to change our approach to business industries or on the war bar, attempting to debunk legitimate science by producing new evidence in science, writing science. that's how ignorant is manufactured their attention only seeking to the rail science rolling using sy itself ah, on february 5th, 2016,

after months of uncertainty, the united nations announces its decision . well, i highlighted with the expert bonaire recall on the swedish and british authorities to and mister i saw as to probation of liberty. i think the recommendation is clear, respect your physical integrity and freedom of movement and afford him the rights to compensation wise with

a lot of those with at least it goes to 0, making money a. a pay with late a little. yes. paying. are you good to see about florence? like you can hear me. i was off a very, very pleased with this thing. we are a was a solid is comprehensive. it's big for me. there's 40 pages. i am not going to be able to

easily here with that uses you cable as well. yeah, sure. and did you see the statement? my, i'll, the british, they say this change is nothing is varying of it is good, is very defensive washington's there, there for them. we can defend and we go back. and i know we have institutional and outside with like i said, telling translate, saying that this is a f as in the loop doesn't yet essential. is that a be a in a new the, like national northside then it just minus us of the applicant us yet. then i've been going up with the web diaz, because i said back to them, isn't that then?

it is easy. believe a guy then, but i like there would yet, but i still look at that. he has a pick out his eloquence. it was good with balls. we use off to declare it says love it, love must content and it is of the strongest thing. i think the key thing to decide is what we say high demand or what you say, i demand the kids and they send me blues. that will need his he, she own for sheila, i'm going to with their idea to mothers with our female. we shouldn't need them discuss it passage because what these decisions say is if you're free to go when you have to go wherever you want, there she simon jenny. louise must see to us. you know, they didn't see on how to read that out. yeah. bassetti emotion.