lucian's aus to the incumbent president at the time. and so, so then of course, the crimea happened in the war in the bass. and again, vladimir putin has reiterated that moscow is very much committed to the misc agreements. according to the latimer, this is the only way forward in resolving and resolving this crisis. so again, a very, i'd say very multi dimensional denial of vladimir putin by vladimir putin, of any malicious intent of any will, militaristic, will opportunities by russia in this, in this sense. now also vladimir putin faced a question about alexia volley, who is serving a, a will a jail term who's he's, who is in jail right now in a penal colony over an embezzlement case. it was a question posed by the b, b. c. also ascii about media outlets and world personalities here in russia who

have been declared for an agents. and well, again, according to well as for, as for the, as for valley to whom, by the way, the russian president referred to quote unquote the man who was allegedly poison. this is an exact quote by the russian leader. and he moved on to talk about how the, how the russian government has been pressing the german european authorities to show them some documents, some lab results. some lab results that here, okay, golly was, or ego will get, let you get back to listening. thanks very much for that. you with the international back to the presidential press conference at the kremlin depends on how negotiations go and another question, what is it? do you think that the west is not understand about russia or about your intentions? thank you. much of the ball the good and he asked for a guarantee and one depends on why didn't will anything depend on then again change

our actions will depend not on the negotiations each but on the unconditional security of russia to day and in the future. and this regard, we have made it absolutely clear that nato is expansion to the east is unacceptable . what's, what's not clear about it, right? we are not the ones that deploy cells that's to the united states. that the other way around the united states brought there in the cells next to our borders. they are at our threshold and they are we excessive in our demands, not to could any more offensive weapons connects to our home. what so unusual about this request committee comes. so what would americans do if we get to the music? we went to the border between the canada in the united states union or to the

border with mexico and deploy our time with their new bill. and you can actually go in the us, the have 3 tauriel disputes before we think about california or texas. have you forgotten about that? but okay, now it come down. no one remembers about it because the way they speak about creamy and now that's great. but we try not to remember how nato was created and was us to each because this is the one who created ukraine's why the millennium, this tablet, ukraine, when he was created the soviet union. and he use his own agenda to create the status. but now the only think we are talking about the security, so let's forget about history. we must think about the security. we do not going to care about negotiation negotiations. we want the result. and i've been talking about the number of times, not

a single inch because to the east. that's what we heard in the 19 ninety's. so now look at what happened last and so they just cheated out of all, vehemently, blatantly t peters. so nato is expanding courses and so now they are in poland. so they have the fancy weapons in there. that's what i'm talking about. we are not the ones who are threatening someone, we are not the ones who came to the board of the us are in the u. k. they came to watch you. yes. and now they are saying, no, now we will have ukraine as well. it means they will deploy their weapons, their worthy, even if not officially, part of nato. if they have some agreements, they will have their basis and they will help their weapons and their that's what we are talking about. and you won your uncles from me. you should come up with guarantees right now immediately and use both of these and not to keep talking

about that for decades that we were on and on. and using these words that we need in your international security. you keep doing what you plan to do. that's what we're talking about. we are not the threat to anyone. what was your 2nd question? if you could repeat it, please, what is it that you think that the west does not show or about your know nature stood still. when you much, then you bring your mind me not the car. so sometimes it seems that we leave in different worlds. i have just sat, i'll be of the thing to you. how can you not stand that issue if they say that they don't, because they expend, but they are expanded? they said they will provide equal guarantees to everyone in the number in the series of international agreements. but that doesn't happen. now live issue

they should use what with him, let them go back in 1919, but more than one of the aides to goodrow bilson, the u. s. president who knew sad that the entire world will feel calmer if she wouldn't gloom that i hear instead of these huge russia off. today we're going to have a separate state and siberia and for more states in the european part of the country that i'm good with that, what was sent back in 1918 and we separated ourselves into 12 parts, i think. and the impression what i get now, that that's not enough for our counterparts, russia is to be now because european nations are becoming smaller. so they are not those great empires of the past anymore. so they are small countries of 60 to 80000000 population. but even after the collapse of the soviet union, we have only 146000000 of population. but that's too much for them. i think that's

the only a group of bible explanation why they keep on exerting this pressure back in the 990. the soviet union did everything to build normal relations with the west and when the united states. and i said that before, and i will say it again because i want your audience to hear it again. i forgot was which mediating right present, but that doesn't matter what think lead in now where nuclear side why nuclear resides. we had representatives from the, from the us services. so that was their job to go there, to our military nuclear sides. they lived there. they went there every day in russian governments. we had got that assistance. we had a, we were personal from c a. what else did you need? why did you need to support theories from the north caucuses? why did you need to use the terrorist organizations?

obvious terrorist organizations to try to dismantle the russian federation, but that's what you did. and now i used to be a f as be the rector, and i know it for a fact. we weren't willing to double agents and they reported to us. they talked to us about the task that they were given by the western secret services. why did you need to do that? you know, you should have treated russia as a possible ally. you should have tried to strengthen the russia. but that was the other way around. you wanted to dismantle the country even more then you start to expand the native to the but we ask you not to do it and you promised that you want to do it. and then you told sure what was the paper where it says we don't care about. there are concerns. definitely. and that happens every year, at least every year we try to talk back, we try to stop this expansion. we were expressing our concerns. no, nothing was the same as a witness. if when you go to hell with your concerns, we will do whatever we deem fit. the actual 5 waves of expansion, cumulus,

when you more so what is known to misunderstanding is about as them, which is why can be understand us. we want to insure our security. all right, i see the region of collusion to banners, the person. good afternoon. hello, good region transmission. i need to i'd like to go back to the cove. it's 19. we spoke about the dangers of covert, but there are other diseases as well. other problems are example plants. medical health is suffering because many new wars given to co patients. and so what's land land across all the diseases is getting worse, especially in the regions? could we reverse the situation? or if we have another wave of coal,

we will have more lockdown and exacerbation of the problem. my 2nd question is yes . is about the post cove it measures were announced in the summer. have you been tracking what's happening? is it working? and is there any 2nd from that? was it to it's a balloon that we should ask for the plan. the video with health plan health care in the 1st period of them was planning against the kelvin down and get suffering, obviously because we needed to legitimately do that as well. but need to quick, you put in the make more bats available for coding patients. secondly, you, we needed for you to have enough specially it's and doctorate is so we had to retrieve them even from the paper and then those therapy is the child care issues appears to help with the fight against the panoramic against kelby. it was

us and we had to reboot route patients as well in this regard. okay. that there will, it's so certain medical institutions were made completely new words and we needed to get the permission of the route, other patients to other hospitals. because that could have some hospitals were shut down. some of the hospitals and medical institutions which had to be shut down to the problem was nicholas cleaned them out for they were cobit where it is. so we had a lot of problems and there was a deficit of that. p, p e is, and i'll move it up with that are necessary, sued, so to get added to the problems that we face. hopefully all this issues we have our account, those help you. we won't have any more deficit, even though we had some problem with oxygen, which i would like to thing the military industry and that helped us to resolve

this issue. hopefully, like i said, in the future, we want this issues anymore. we had, we got help from volunteer, like we got help from the college teachers. we got help from the senior student. and in overall, i think we ex, succeeded in putting all our forces together and to be efficient enough to we stand all this noise in the probably in europe, france and one of the areas where we've worked hard. not only that was prevention with the level of kelpie, but also re rehabilitation upgrade. so we allocated certain funds to help with maybe it's not as efficient as we hoped. it would be too late. we should have only 1000000 people who got rehabilitation out there. and they said some rehab system muscles to which was to be working for good and without the koby situation and

challenges in normal times by dispos colbert rehabilitation. even though it is a patient enough and it helps people to become feel better to become healthier. so maybe as they have some thoughts about it, so they have some superstitions against into some so they are afraid to get infected in institutions like bad. but our especially, it's our doctors because they do all they can to ensure the safety of the people who come for the rehabilitation. and to help this people, because they recover from kilborn people, they really need the rehabilitation with him because we know that the covey fact old body organs are old body parts, some hard kidneys, speech and cure lever everything. because the fact that human brain can be a factor, so they need rehabilitation, people need rehabilitation and then,

and we established a good system. so hopefully it will expand, it will grow bigger. but we have all conditions necessary, and that's precedent posted answering yet another question on russia's response to the cove it pandemic. i doubt it'll be the last 2 either. we're about 90 minutes into the issues press conference with the russian leader talking to journalists locally and from around the world as well with me in a studios ortiz or on a boyfriend. now, one of one back here, the probably the most animated, the presidents, golf. so far on the, some of these questions was an answer to sky news in the u. k. on the threat of the russian invasion of ukraine. any ricky went for it and make well, he did because this is one of the hottest issues for him. personally, i think because, you know, his legacy, he used to be stationed in germany when the soviet union was falling apart. and he remember that time very vividly be the guarantees that are given

russian. and if he talks about those russian populations that are in those post soviet locations, let's go back to the chain but now in the criminal, it say to and so they don't have enough gas, but it's gas problems fold from the speck of truth. any of these accusations that we use, but i was in the process but because normally it's just an attempt to turn things around the special one of your colleagues asking why can last understand you're playing all the time? that's why you get from it you. you will gas from is delivering as a potential nation, everything dad or the contract or is are asking for you to the contract. we house and not only the amount of requests, but we increase the deliver even by wealth per sandra. 20 percent,

to that you hope to europe and the 2 other conference you can take care of you and increase the supply teacher and the company. and that's the only company if we talk about the world wide market that's doing vast and nice, spoke about it as well as an international events that the american suppliers lap european market. not yet pages and open shooting the premium and delivering some small amounts of gas like and so they went to the premium markets to brazil, to asia, china, south korea, japan because they can pay more european stock. they were a premium market. no, they were wrong. and then the prices went up and fucked off. there are a lot of factors, bad weather last here and when you had called and long spring, so they didn't accumulate enough gas in underground storage. so it created some deficit listed and official authorities,

your company are shaking their gas company as you and do not invest enough money to expand you correctly gas extraction. that's why we have that data. so they didn't put enough gas into their storage, and now they have to use the search a lot. so of course that creates a problem. and yet some western operators, they store the gas shift in underground storage in ukraine. so now they extracted from it. and now they use it in their account, transfer you to go buy his immigrants to it, but he had to get obviously the gas from the storage is much cheaper than the one they buy, study at the market. but we have said before that, do not, don't go to the ruling, this long term contracts do not destroy those long term contract. you know, they said we must use the market to regulate things. so okay,

that's what you have to do, but it's a $1000.00 for 1000 cubic meters. say ok, you wondering if you want to do you have it all yesterday they were saying no rush of expanding gas from expanding the corner in the market. and we were ordering the market. yes, we are supplying a lot, but we are not the only supplier. we had this market, we are the only ones that increases the supply issues. nothing seems to be gas there, but we need to satisfy the needs of our contracts. that we have long term relations with them. so look at what is happening now to get them the biggest customer that we have is germany in europe. so i may be mistaken, but i think 50 or 51000000000 up cubic meters. so we have to leave per 1000005600000000 cubic meter. it's more of that, which is 10 percent from that agreed amount. that's a lot was we supplied. additionally,

2000004.4. what's the length of meters? you roper, you talked about in europe or he goes up line. so i hear this accusation that gas from it is 2 or 3 days in a row that has not booked the traffic to supply gas to europe using this pipeline that you're given them. what can be discovered? no. so the snap see, i didn't know how to put it, don't use it because of that was a threat here. that's just too much. they haven't booked these traffic because there's contract for the other companies. and i'm talking 1st of all about german companies and french companies that are buying gas to leverage by data by flying. they have not requested data. so what do we transit, why do we send there? if we don't have any requests, if we do not have any request to claims that would be to buy this candidate. so and

they reversed it. so from germany it went to poland. what could you show me so now the pump from germany to poland for a number of days. i think it's an interesting thing to think about with them where everyone, why is it happening? because we are supplying gas to germany, contract them under long term contracts, and the price under contracts, it's $3.00 or 4 times league signed 7 times cheaper than the spot. there's a pity, but enough, i didn't miss. so even by reselling one cubic but the 1000000000 cubic meters, you can make almost $4000000000.00. that's business. but number of up, you know, nobody on pollute you. so after getting a certain volume, certain amount of gallium, per getting 5600000000 cubic meters, more speed for the you. so now they are a salad, but that's not all of it. but there's no measure because you're so the company in

reverse by that and how can we pump it straight to them, because we can use the same pipeline to move it. dad's both ways. so they didn't make a bit and they reverse the gas using this pipeline, but that's only part of the information, but there is the pipeline that connects the polish. i'll be your pipeline and ukrainian one volume is you deal in cubic meters. so it's, that's how much they sell from germany to poland and just going we have all the reasons to believe that the gas goes to ukraine. eventually you and consumers in europe in germany have to admit that there's still nothing that's what's happening in reality. in fact, which may be what they do on the instant they need to go to the 30th tune. here are some clarifications, and instead of sending pumping it to pull them down to ukraine,

trying to help them to stay on their feet somehow in nice to buy stuff tv so that maybe they should rather keep on supplying gas to europe, to germany and implants the price, because the bigger if there is a product at the market, price will be better, but now they pumping back. that's the problem gas from has nothing to do with it. they move so glad them take care of their issues. and then you could and you and they should react in time and you'd like you and they should not think that they are so smart. i believe we got to run you through the, the problems that they are creating for themselves. you mean you must be resolved by themselves. we are ready to assist them and that's it. and i think i was pretty convincing and demonstrating that just right now. ok, we're listening that to the russian present president vladimir to,

to need. he's holding his annual and a press conference in moscow at the moment and to talk through some of the points of he's been raising over the last couple of hours or so on. a boy have joined me in the studio and the big topic that everybody was focused on today, particularly was nato was. and what specifically did he say about that? well, it's a very emotive issue for like a mere pretend. and one of the top on the international agenda right now, following russia's last week, proposal tonight to, to the united states to science science some sort of binding security guarantees which will ensure. 2 on the one hand, russia strategic security and on the other hand, lay some of the western concerns with regards to rational behavior. what's interesting about it is that the west, despite those this proposal being perceived as rushes ultimatum, did not rejected out of hand. and vladimir putin once again reiterated today that

the reason why russia felt press to put that on the table is because it feels deceived. he said that russia was promised many, many times, that the russia that made the will not expand towards russia borders that it will not accept new members, that it will not move it's striking capabilities ever closer to russia's borders. and despite those verbal assurances, nader proceeded enlarging itself with 5 different waves, open lodgement, and right now we're going to saying that enough is enough. we need to ensure our security is not a matter of principle for us. it's a matter of an existing existential concern. and this is what russia who intends to do whether or not the west james is acceptable. i mean, he was no negative. i mean people obviously very where he was going on. i think we tired of this topic already. i mean, have been yeah,

but he has rush is put forward proposals, isn't it? and he was positive in the sense that he was saying we are going through ongoing negotiations now with the us. and he said something about perhaps talks in the new year. how long is russia prepared to wait? she think, well, russia has their that's the beauty of it. thrashing is not waiting. what the problem is essentially saying is whether or not you agree to that. we will proceed and do what we deem necessary for ensuring our security. if you want to be aware of our plans, if you want to coordinate with us, you know, here we are, we can negotiate. but whether or not you accept this russian proposal along with russia, we'll continue investing in the new weaponry systems. it will call lessons troops of whatever it deems necessary within its borders. so the current concerns about the accumulation of russian troops on the western border is,

you know, it's within the ration of warranty. but again, if the west has any interest in sort of bringing down the tensions in a little bit and it's not just about the tensions, it's about the normal expenses. i mean, keeping troops on high alert costs a lot of money from both sides. so if nature and russia, one to, you know, channel those resources when they actually very much needed, be, you know, fight against corporate 19 warm climate change, whatever. if you want to re prioritize how you spend your money. here we are, we can give each other guarantees that we're not going to, you know, play on each other, nurse continuously. but i suppose at the same time, no, even of america has come forward and said i will put forward it to men to look at these proposals. we'll, we'll start some sort of negotiation in january. in the meantime, we keep funneling alms in series the new crime. well, i think it's actually more for the show than for any sort of real change on

the ground. because i think what, what's clear is that the button administration really wants to divest itself financially from europe. it has more interest in creating a sort of correlation in, in its rivalry with, let's say china and it's investing a lot of resources. and let's say a strategy and military industrial complex, but when it comes to europe, it's not eager actually to continue maintaining such a large military presence. and i think that there, there is actually a really interest on the part of the bite and ministration. we're not going to be friends again, i'm not going to be allies, but i don't think they want to keep the tension going at such high peach continuously. simply because there is there an accurate realization in the white house that, that many more problems that needs to be addressed and job by them. and the democratic party are facing a pretty,

pretty soon. and if you look at the economic fingers, if you look at location, if you look at buttons, approval ratings, they have a lot of things to worry about. apart from russia. with regard to trying to mean hearing the phrase minsk agreement come up again. i mean, this has been going on for years and hasn't made any real headway. how much pressure, i say pressure, how much of the negotiation should be directed towards ukraine itself? because at the moment seems to be to way between russia in the us. when you don't because well, i guess it's a hard question for everybody involved. i think there is a huge sounds of fatigue with regards to this whole situation, not only russia, but also in the west. it's pretty clear that the western or rather the western policy ukraine, has not produced a viable, self sustaining faith and the existence of the ukraine as a,

as an irritant. for russia, you know, it may have a certain purpose, but i don't think there is much interest in europe or in the united states to continue continue bank crawling your plane and continue solving and problems. and this is what i think you're creating. leadership has been doing a long trying to initiate exploitation that your crime will follow the u. s. his lead on this. so he's off these negotiations in january whenever they made a one of the us lead the i think the vitamin ministration is gravely divided on this issue. there are lots of fractions even within the current white house, many different women's if then let's say anthony blink and they had of the state department and national security advisor, jeff sullivan. they have different ideas about how to solve this issue. and i'm not, i'm not quite sure that they actually even eager to solve the ukrainian question of per se, but they, they don't want to be preoccupied so much. and they understand that if indeed there

is a major confrontation in the united states will have to get involved. and i know of keep mentioning the negotiations are going to half in january. but actually the premise is pretty simple. don't allow you crime to join nato, but nobody in the west is going to agree to that. so how could you really have any negotiation that's going to solve the problem? well, i'm not quite sure that was actually really wants to see ukraine and native because neither of rather ukraine is it pretty tumble of some actor? i mean, it's good to use it and it's effective to use it as an irritant or trouble maker for, for russia. but do you think, nathan, really once you invest so much in ukraine knowing how difficult it is to get anything done in the country, i mean, even if we put the issue of the conflict aside, let's say, let's say the fight against corruption. managing the state.