when you are with us on the west, look at the border as moved to the east or will be force that absolutely i am. i am with weapons or totally milk even further. we should we move it or the on the euro's a, the, we must see what is known in you, or if you can figure it out. so, an end to the open doors and all of your hand, a legal guarantee that nato, with least a swab will the will, the often with this is an issue. i'm sure you have free choice. you open your mouth, not. it's not something we see in international relations and with in the form that talk later, a little bit of a described with as opposed to the review of the security and the full interest of others. we should not be infringed upon with. these are direct

requirements for each team is not on the ground, try and in a large number of international legal documents with including the european security. let's charter the equipment and what it will you should and other fundamental documents which you government states activities by the more or if you're not sure, adopted at o. s. c e level. up with. so nato's attempts to try to print out a new she's talking indivisibility of security. and principle that only applies to lambda countries is unacceptable to, i mean, so lucky you're wearing, i'm sorry, it was like in what little voices i would look for the body from this principle. if apply this way, it will only link to further risks. and we made ourselves clear and

a man from the line with you and you have understood that this is the principal position that way will not move forward with a, with a new dollars. this was the same rules in with our life and the pro. so it allowed us to got a new study. she'll bring to light some issues which were in the background previously. and this was a you know, this is kind in that it was very frank. and i think that we've managed to make it

clear to a situation is become angry, intolerable, call russia. and that risks, nothing more involved in which is the current course chosen by later. what is it a 3? this will only come with the benefits for a traditional new mantra, which is not something that said the future of european security should be locked up. as nato centric stucco, global that c p and security, you will be a global with a new new port i thinking with many of us not a bit. daniel stood today that this story will have to count a,

which is a sequence is pushing it in a serious and this message and may look differently. no, a balance we support is peaceful solutions based on a reasonable balance one earlier. so when you go, if we draw historical, let you have comparisons almost to what should little and this is a conversation would that is a good often wound up dolls from history. it's really useful to learn less. all this from history, we call back up of cuba. in the 60s, it will choose no way to insure security and it was free choice. it's a pretty old unit us on that. and the solution was a found proposal world that humans mute a touching base touch on the very pragmatic problem. sure. on the balance of military interests. and that allowed countries to move from a very dangerous bring some principles, a lapse nor policy expansion with being

a result of the open door policy or credit. the good news in the most book on that is still something new because it did not exist until when you were the ninety's the doors, it was closed before that come during the feel we should usually about what we cannot imagine a situation and 1919 you will see when president gorbachev discussed the new security architecture where that try call and other leaders go. and we wouldn't know this without us. i'm imagining that they would say that article 10 wouldn't have to coons for states to be allowed to make their own decisions. and were bought a prius. instead, it was accepted that nato would not expand to the east ma get there was at the conference bridge involving am they current, herschel, when they said that in this way,

douglas warden was that what would happen to do so, and it was up to say, we pursued or from the war. that's the strengthening of european security. but it requires a clear understanding got order to reach that the nato expansion or will entail risks or should in you that will be greater than any potential benefits from you such for the serial number you, which is in the open door policy. so the son was only that to the 1994 and it had other goals such a sure in european security homeschool property. and the 2nd thing is, looks like she and of a point, steps on your daughter. no. on no 3rd. countries may influence latest policy. got so members, a sub was my what you and the configuration later forces other attributes to the room. you're not going to school to go if we take to look at the german 3 only for

cation of dollars. but we also see a different approach you, she knew so not going to do a treaty. we have a treaty provisions to distinguish the steps and band nato forces us on your left or still on german trying to train or minute and the german army yours was always limited to a certain we was a full size and it was accepted that this would be enough for security system in europe and up with neutral, neutral, just go to the back. i will go back to that a

with a new law national. so i'm not sure with much scope as well. so let me start from out to plymouth, a dealer, you see rich door store, not sure diploma. you scoop additional to the thing is that i need to pull up a book tara's, as a result of some spontaneous decision was stopped by the russian side and it was the direct result of unfriendly action a. these actions west systemic can characterize to what we will go stuck on with the question. yes, because our records, our representation was officially reducing, working to way up, so no one to 30 pulled up to 8 people and that was completely groundless. they were

ashy. now using this all to be a member, some faster special services and the numbers are 5. personnel stops are fixed at 10, and this is completely unacceptable with russia will not allow anyone to dictate the michelle to go to use a lot of the number of personal items. and if you nato countries, nemea repeatedly say that they have no intention with regard to russia. and they are willing to refuse to build a cooperation mutual understanding still, it means that it would be in their entrances, diploma to have more russian diploma be to me and focus diplomats, physicians, you know, being paid annually that i will fall. that is providing objective information on

monday morning on what's happening and you decide it's not that led with these measures can be understood, you should get on those issues on your photo matches may be disappointing, russian. so really should have done meetings and it's not from issue i'm with pursuing a different agenda and course we suspended as we are in your and the mission. but we're not, we're not course go withdraw it completely off story so. so if nater go to choose a different course or you knew that would become a part of compatible with the comment, your effort to support or not to build european security based on different principles. those nato is pursuing today. for more than i would not rule out that some mission would be restored with, but this would require a positive, a general notion. you also on the table was once we will discuss

today, i'm looking for the common to put the interest. so we're not are both both and the nato russia council, although no one was created, it was a little room to revive cold. the lawyer, principles of missouri were act jointly. your thoughts were you through a political dial and serious consider wheels and the security horizon to find the common interests you. but you much industry that would require joining forces to bill security in the labor and to have to coordinate with all a senior. my parents are all used to go to maybe new conduct a joint operation, wallace when you're talking about a joint achievement here in spotswood, we have managed to find a place to sort of that way this year was conducive to the stool. strengthening of

security. both russia and the other countries and you're not on such shows and i've got a style that i see and not the bullet roland, drug trafficking and other efforts fucking a got to we had a big project to sort of your, to have been trained to about 3000 offices on a situation country. so a studio, but it was awesome. we had successful in finding piracy in la moda with section rescue operations, etc. but it was good ideas. mm hm. what about the, what we had, i just need to rush on counterterrorism plans. we ship, we, we developed systems, bizarre buses that allowed us to mr. improve the mass and gathering a site security. a few more searches on transport with them. got a little believe established a common, a space with

allowed us to monetize with a new to new store to push it. but, but in order to prevent terrorist attacks, we're with on ation. baldwood. we have a, it's a book, i'm a new this and i've been out of projects. i was 9 me to come to projects would scarcely makoto. those will pre k, create a project where a chemical weapon, when you are supposed to be destroyed, i showed you to use the filter through the other than the chemical weapons, replace toner would ship some alkalis clear that it would be a prime target for terraces. so i thought i so should we had a junior the mutual history at 1st,

the more russian native joint operations, another new to of some sort of perfume. now, this does not happen anymore. the nato russia council was created for these purposes all up on your school districts. and with some point, we realized that tighter and that was why did another positive agenda should help us allows us to train our security. interested in you are closer to a common ground area and to strengthen leaders in the ties to boost. she wouldn't have to sort of where the real security with, which is now this is no more because nato could love announced that to russia was somewhat main. eith, william, renew my friends and my opponent. you with that nato would resort to, to call you by containing russia and we will not allow this because this

fringes no on russia, security are mondays. hello, charlotte debowski from monterey international. the nato secretary general said, today that the easiest way to solve the tensions would be from russia to deescalate, did you have a sense that russia needs to do most of the work can for me to when to do, and what will me to do to deescalate tensions, and if i may, a secondary question on the issue of nato expansion. we know that ukraine in georgia would be red line to russia. but we've heard from the us in the last day or so. but they are open to negotiations with finland and suite 2, given the fact that both of these countries proceed to policy of neutrality with this also be a red line for russia. what would russia next that be if these negotiations continue the bidding?

yeah, i just thought that said i, when you get on to that, not as a huge store or so, i'm glad the nature of, of the boy them in the probably knew what it is. color nearly was the sheer store with bush chest that i bought. i said that they would do it. neither. e, a grainy good was the even lend, usually at same very aggravating or store the plane you're gaining or with just the shaggy did better go to the land. you should see cut down, you less and you can use them. he left the class maybe need let a c e w address yet. but you're a more proof of purchase coverage for her to mothers. as regards the 1st question, the escalation was a subject that was discussed with in 2 aspects to day. and the 1st, when i came over is organizing our military activities in such a way that it does not lead to dangerous incidence. and to,

to further risk. and control escalation, escalation was raised and it was raised in today, mentioned that as they mentioned, is that the military activity should be deformed in the way that profound occurrence of dangerous incidents of thought were you always marian, you we, i mean the don't visit, look at the police are new to will this notion, me not just give me a call, but i am the 2nd dimension, as it was presented by our nita colleagues, if the base collision around ukraine does not produce up. so look up on your plan. there's deluxe, it was more of our position is crystal clear here. ah . but there's a few in your presume, but in which it will last. if you go up on your fall, no more. it is a slow no more misuse of. we're sure you got already with just, you know,

for our result i should bring it is i use a watch be sure i got it as opposed to 1st key of needs to stick to the implementation of means. agreement means arrangements, and it is a part of international law that is stipulated by the un security, resolute security council. resolution 2052 wouldn't. i mean, it's because of rush when you were pulling in the you would get new cup worlds and new as opposed to a new user to threaten solar system. if the means the agreement i implemented, there will be no threat to the sovereignty or territorial integrity of crane. yet i was a decent duck with this girl. it's donna, it is the wasn't marginal. you seem way amy will do a minute or some way media will toaster on another version, it corrected. check with away on this,

i used to go gray in your particular cheese by stuff kill regular does a which is be a part of it dropped off. i just sort of was all that. so hopefully pretty this morning, the se, se a issue with blood renewing is good. glad to promote the only possibility escalation of a need to members need to still providing support to ukraine, to deliver weapons over there. and to provide the training for the at, for safety. and it was stipulated by the arrangements e ah, when us was a word, but she says her lenient thought, fucked still is not of school extra corner, you know, crashing with banyon. you, mr. rushing, you registry. and i was living in the future were willing me to caribbean, yet again, i just, i believe the number of shares, regrettably nater does not refer to the need to implement to means agreements. ah, when you man a push you more are not the newly that explanation,

but almost of shows are that you said film, which double pretty sonya, which i see of greg, just around the country. we understand why it is happening and why nato does not want to mentioned means, agreements and derangement. the reason behind it is the following. nato wants to present russia as f party to conflict with what if sure, the daughter chase, but each q dot on upper or she does go to when you are seeing your presumably you and one is also e. but if you soon, you could get the, what are the in the fall of or nation you are in, i'm hearing your potash in your facility. that is a part of the policy to deter russia and is presented as an adult. oh, he showed us which are the most or rule which he has that already said to us. now. correct. you are group new york romeo pony and you mr. rushing. you just to with those rights to you on the bill was jeff national,

are boucher joe cutler. units which i think you may not see other, which is not on the go. i don't think that ordering me it assume there's not on the there's no wrong probably busy just once again. there are no other ways of these collisions, but the implementation of the means can agreement. and we will insist that our counterparts would stick to these means agreements as they are a part of the international law stoker so so. so i'm gonna show you that the annual, the shows and is the word strong. we should go to the, i don't store sharina, nothing new to show me back. you probably a little bit steep is up us as to neat expansion, i would not name any certain countries. bobby expansion does not resolve the issue of security or sharing your mouth on your 3rd. or if you didn't really need, i pretty much it's a totally cool down or should is the expansion just move the divisions lines

but not remove them? me to retain a bit of notion shipped um or what accountable zealand to mr. on the mcarthur idea to support each school. when you proceed in union, we accept as the policy of the countries that decided not to get engaged in the lines that are produced by the ski when, when the presidio and an alignment ah, the onions net i'm but i'm not sure beautiful machine e and we swore them was, that was still nash hope you can serious, or i needed to it again i knew contribute arsic, a tory me, it's an issue. and if needed and these countries know that we support the policy of non alignment and it is in our both interests off these policy to be deceived. for that, yet the utmost not a party to get the national away them for ages 8 before is both to our policy and

our military issues. ah sure, wouldn't you my, are they sure us from the easier all you mostly us to your shooting and not in the west hope they should bring it today. once again, assessed in details at the nato expansion east towards ah, both use get a yawn. this should use or june of the bureau do these 3 to what? let's take her instance the baltic region from 1991 to 2003, 3. but you certainly still know thing is i using 3 baltic countries gain independence. and you can, you can i, visitors because when you're wearing those, i do see him no obligations about providing military assistance, fortescue new shops, whoever's on the hill, no own military forces. not nobody mill in your bill and you could keep,

it was up us, it was with us. you got you. but at the same time, no threat to these countries. what not showing you situ, mr. only me on us military could walk away in the core processor the way the 30th colleen got we had only 2 military issues with these countries. colleen and grid issued by way and a concern you of the future and the take off or the retired veterans. nick doing is well me a still work from credit order. me a problem with us for that or no one knew that van about the issue off of last carried or, or transponders. you've torn you who are a lot on story from that. as a she said, nobody talked about the meal is push leaves to plan. you gotta do to to sure how to summer spoke when they were in and with us. she knew on of european bill. but what i should let you know who i am, the one second. but the situation has changed after they doing me too. and the most

quiet and calm region in a europe turned into the arena for military tension. go at all rural neutral one from that knowing you may of 2 or little vision if don't store tucker by leach, go on the outside with a quote to pull you up with almost on us as a risky, as opposed to on that one or the regular which is poor research and well making sure that it was up one. no, but if she were, was that i was bizarre process knowing the principal i thought of here go, i don't the principal, he's a human, she was of boston. we're convinced that these policy does make no good and great risks for the security. we have to take to all range of measures to prevent the escalation and the situation get worse. but the most important thing that we would like to stick to the principle of indivisible security, or he appreciate it and i do show across which was coverage for the key. what to

fundamentals issue of what hold up is between europe. escape is a process. john nuclear says you were the new buzzword in numbering it. concordia later shania with national guardian. when that was done, you should use it. and getting back to the previous questions. these fundamental discrepancies did not allow us to make decisions regarding the algorithm of further activities. actually is issue with one of my 2 because i cannot so story is keep it . it wasn't really starting with decent. louisa was mentioned in the an are see that the russian could. those have been presented in britain and europe. so i look upon yoko, they are crystal clear, i knew it was a mostly i was on them. they are interdependent. if nija ross, my through scott, was got a little more social to wookey, with his human chiquita. they cannot be perceived as ad rasan, bam. way you can just to traces out of him without i. she threw him not or store around another estate. sorry somebody i've seen you

a tom cock merchant bicycle which you were born. yes, the go. i don't know if you took your luxury in your gut. dora, when we're doing loaded alibaba needs, but she more, i need a new pretty. i mean, we expect that nato countries would provide the ideas on how to implement our proposals, or providing at e corroboration widely and not acceptable. the enough for the one that is over more than i would bring your cherishing nice you to know. i woke up, you have to do it based on that, who will be able to make a decision on the future actions? don't the blood as i do so you know what that or that a go for a mother for matter. including in the n r a c is home it or she wouldn't be able to resume, will not socialist. we should bring you to like usa brushing. you don't really my vision more with peter as far as we understood, after the 2 days discussions,

we got a perception that these proposals can be transferred to us in written him up with him as a book previous to and we would welcome that special but sure enough for pro still have a good a sheet which to against her as jenna what i said about interested her latasha kabuki says you mom a shipment with us more someone that lives in pennsylvania. a said that we like to have it scheduled with consultations. a

we expect any construct if you still go to the store, i wouldn't sleep about as much money at this point. i would say that because it is important to you that every everyone understands to wonder how serious we were to know. the situation is with regard to our common security and critical solution. so it has an open secret on today because those are just wanted to do that. so with our discussions last said that 4 hours and i got all made for countries with a chance to state that positions and a we also use the floor several times. it was a very open and frank conversation another. what do you got?

so if we speak about further steps with what we need to move forward, so free tracks are 1st being stabilizing force deployment situation of the process of spiritual rushing and reversing. we'll look at the situation to 1997 where to prosper. situation was very stable with regard to a threats and counter threat. everyone was happy to roll and the 2nd aspect, very difficult. uncovered serious difference since day is native's expansion to the east, but from which you should be up with them. halted and not what i want you to just which are governed by way of the promises. but like you just go to sort of the put it with the legal guarantees. a couple.