tv News RT January 12, 2022 2:00pm-2:31pm EST
2:00 pm
rendered us pretty dangerous as to ourselves to the plan and i sneaked has been trying to wind the clock back to cold hold times. but then from a russian press briefing after high stakes talks in brussels, nato understands the principle would be in the visibility of security selectively. if nato applies a policy of containment against russia, moscow will have to take a calendar with also the com. britain's prime minister apologizes for telling a locked down drinks party in the back garden at number 10 in 20. 20. it was the 1st time is admitted his presence but now says he thought it was a work event on top advice here or not cuddly. a pet, since you start jumps, if you want to stay warm this winter, you k energy firm feels the heat for most customers after giving that particular
2:01 pm
set of advice as a cost of fuel source. i think i've completely lost the floss on that. well, i have to say, we're not she paid really crazy near our and how because we're trying to get the close down. you just think what else was today with hello there, life mart, international world news center in moscow will welcome to our world. is it 10 with me, kevin? no. so 1st russia, the nato delegations have spent the day talking big time in those talks wrapped up in brussels for the day. now. they've been held in an effort to try to reduce tensions on the continent. it's the 1st time the nato russia council convened at more than 2 years. moscow slammed the lines for trying to return to old confrontations. nato nato understands the principle of the indivisibility of security so actively in the eyes of nato. it exists only for members of the
2:02 pm
alliance, and nato won't take into account the security concerns of others. we firmly believed that the principle at the end of visibility of security should take into account the interests of all, and that attempts to build security against russia without russia's participation are doomed to failure. if nato applies a policy of containment against russia, moscow will have to take a counter math with you through the discussions that took place here in brussels. and also of course, touching on the discussions that took place in geneva just 2 days ago. ah, we got the line that the us and its allies were attempting to achieve dominance in all areas. whether that be land, sea in cyberspace, at the issues between russia and nato. and, ah, and not a allowing them to have a uniting agenda on things. a perhaps incredibly important, such as a fight against terrorism, the issues in afghanistan and also trafficking. and the further deterioration we
2:03 pm
were told that would result in unpredictable and serious consequences. as they was an expectation that nato might give feedback to what russia has already outlined as being its demands, it's red lines on the number of areas and, and if nato deems those to be unacceptable rusher expects an answer as to why they would be deemed annex sense and acceptable, and he also said that everyone needs to understand how serious this situation is right now. and in regards to security, talks being deep and substances, but really uncovered that there were bain fundamental divisions between the 2 sally's on a number of issues. and one of the things that was pointed out in the prescott, since this was nato understands security at the principle being bought a selective y e and the stand security for its own allied nations,
2:04 pm
but not necessarily for everyone else, including the russians. charlotte correspondent has been the bring this extensive coverage throughout the day. oh no. what happens in brussels? let's not talk to dallas. so this law through a lot of new york city washington closely. actually. yeah, i was saying to a correspondent the daniel just now spends that you look at a glass is half full or half empty. expectations weren't high going into these talks today. everyone said there of course, can be very difficult to seem to be poles. a part of thought neither side would live is the bad, the thought it was going to be. or is there any ray of hope here? well, i think actually the talks themselves are very interesting and that russia has succeeded in impressing upon the us. and nato generally, that it has security concerns that must be taken into effect into account the,
2:05 pm
even though the us insist on it's right to admit nato and admit the ukraine and ga into nato. if it's so wishes, at some point the future rushes reaction has clearly given at pause. and i think the u. s. is hesitant, depressed this issue much more. i think the that it was taken back by the russian response. it has it now a grease that rushes concerns must be taken into consideration and this is due, this is a, this is actually a change in the u. s. nato attitude. so i think that something, some kind of significant shift may be underway. what do you say to the people that can do this in the west and ukraine, and georgia, etc. the say, well, hang on, if you would, if you're going to russia, say you can do whatever you like within your own boundaries, the mass, whatever tribute you want to do, everything on your own side. you can't tell us what to do. therefore,
2:06 pm
we can do what we want to do, join whatever political voting protection group we want to you kind of it both ways is the argument can rush of it both ways. no, of course the rush again have a both ways and neither can nato, i mean, look at if the, if the us, if mexico and entered into a, into a military alliance with china or with russia or both. the u. s. would be going bonkers at this point. so and the, and the, the u. s. is tacitly admitted and very important sections of the u. s. press has, has outright lee admitted that russia's security concerns are, are genuine, and have to be addressed. so i think therefore that means that the u. s. is beginning to think about some way of meeting those concerned. and i one that i was going to say to morrow, i wonder the way out of this tomorrow. there's no s c meeting in vienna. a wonderful way forward is to have some sort of as rush has been suggesting,
2:07 pm
maybe some sort of european security packed with is that the way forward that keeps nato where it is. but, you know, countries like georgia, like ukraine, the bolted countries, they can feel they've got some security. while perhaps, you know, it also, i think, would be the high time for, for individual countries like germany, to speak out and making, make known. it's views in this question because germany, you have isn't a very different position from the, from the us and, and it's, it certainly does not want to confrontation with russia as any. so what do we know about the stance while germany seems to be committed to some kind of aust politic relationship with, with german, with russia in which i'm a realistic foundation as established for german russian relations. germany has as wants to open the, the nord stream to pipeline and wants russian gas and russian energy. it doesn't
2:08 pm
want it's, it's, it's gas cut off in the middle of winter. so and i think germany is committed to a long term business like relationship with, with rush, let us see what he wants you think it should be doing more was to, to, to, to access media broker. totally totally. and the, the new and the new social democratic lead governing coalition and in germany should certainly step forward and make it views known before the new account in washington. you know, you know, cause serious trouble. russia said to tell you that nate has expansion doesn't solve any security problems. it's going to do quite the opposite. it's going to make security problems. you think we're going to be up against that or no. we also had other guest today saying, you know, end of the day yet some sort of confrontation in the future kind of be ruled out. but it's very, very, the chance of it's very, very low. while you have that, you have the neocons and i and washington who were as powerful as ever ever. and
2:09 pm
you have east european governments, you know, from the out of the baltic to the black sea who are committed to a show down with russia. and so they're pushing for a confrontation, and they are very strong and very influential. and remember, the democrats spent the entire trump period, essentially, you know, demonizing, russia and blaming russia for the political problems in the u. s. which is the course ridiculous. so, so the democratic party is committed some kind of show down. by the same time, there are rays of light in the form of realism, some sense that russia, you know, is not to be trifled with. it's security concerns are, are, are real and significant. and there really is no point to push for. ready a needless confrontation, which would plunge the entire continent of the chaos. yeah, i mean, the, the allegations are, again, the russia is preparing to invade ukraine. russia. keep saying, no,
2:10 pm
it's not. we would want the sanctions for a start. it wouldn't want extra trouble with double the trouble. it's already got that's been imposed on it. do you think this was i was going to come this day really played out as expected, but there was never going to be any big breakthrough. so part of a much longer term game, maybe over the coming weeks, months, even years before something thrash that. but this is almost one of the heights of the, of the pressure times over it, you know, to made. yeah, i think i think where we're in a long, long term game here. i think that the, that the, that, that these maneuvers will play out over a period of months. if not longer, that there's a good deal of maneuvering will take place back and forth. busy but i think the, i think the west has gotten the message that there it's reached the point of diminishing returns. there is no, no point in pressing further east and that russian security concerns should be addressed. americans in a very tough spot. i mean, after afghanistan,
2:11 pm
u. s. comp incompetence and weaknesses exposed all the world to say so now biden is determined to show that america as back in america is as tough as ever. but the talk sounds increasingly hollow, sound especially hollow to european ears. what could the solution be even got a minute left us? can you hear me talking about this for years? what could the solution be to the ukraine problem on both sides? some kind of promise or so kind of tacit promise not to incorporate the ukraine into nato for if not forever, that for the foreseeable future, some kind of promise not to not to further a weaponized the conflict by putting you know, high tech, nato weapons and how old, are you creating the party, you crying that wants to go the way? what set it for them? you know, how they got to be bought off if you like. the ukraine. ukraine is a broken society. i as a broken nation, a failed state,
2:12 pm
it is entirely dependent on the u. s. in the and it has no choice but to do what the u. s. that, that the u. s. says that it's, you know, that it's, or you already said by the way it will go to war over the ukraine at the us. we made that quite clear even though if a conflict, but it wasn't too rough. it would probably still be dragged him by hook or by crook . but what the us was, what the u. s. as the ukraine has no choice, but to go along with dallas, janice, north, i love to have you on the program, get your views. so i know you're often with people of all most get on the new site as well. have a good evening day. there were close to this with the new york city, but by that, you know, next we go hello. read this prime minister boris joseph is admitted that he did attend a dining street policy in the back garden opiate the heights of the 1st national, colbert lockdown in 2020. he apologized to britain's earlier on here at the time. of course not even allowed to go into one another's homes,
2:13 pm
let alone visit the elderly, dying sick, loved ones, while arguing. he thought you say there for 20 minutes, it was a work event. i appreciate the, the point that he's making about the event that i attended. i want to, i want to repeat that. i think it was a, a work event. if politicians form perhaps both sides of the aisle or concern they'd like to see, not just an apology from bars, johnson but resignation as well. because this seems to be a common theme. now of course, because our minds back to roughly the spring of 2022 years ago now we had the whole country. in fact, most of the world locked down almost completely and we've seen in the u. k. again and again. revelations of politicians, particularly conservative politicians, those close downing street having christmas parties, for example, while people couldn't see that dying relatives, or in this case
2:14 pm
a garden party in may of 2020. when many people were, for example, not seeing relative things stuck away from loved ones who are suffering and other restrictions on their lives. now the image that the country has is that those are the top, the elite don't seem to think rules apply to them. and for many politicians, the only way to regain public trust is if the man responsible for all of this, the prime minister parish johnson finally resigns. his defense, his defense, that he didn't realize he was at a party ha, that is so ridiculous that is actually offensive to the press with the whole country was locked down. he was posting lucy parties in town express, easy now going to to, to decent thing. and resign mister speaker, it's up to the right honorable gentleman to choose how he conducts himself. yes.
2:15 pm
me. now what we've also see in our repeated examples of boris johnson previously pleading his innocence in saying that actually nothing had taken place. that was against the many rules that once again, the rest of the country through a number of messaging techniques and the some psychologists have put it. and other medical professionals must formation consistently putting out messaging to the public to stick to the rules. the government, apparently seeing at the time anyway, many figures within the government that they themselves didn't have to stick to the rules. but in any case, we've seen nothing but denials. up until this point they viewed was a party, said you, it was against the rules. they knew they couldn't admit it, and they thought it was funny. the prime minister has been called right handy. why? definitely envy investigation right now. but just admitting it,
2:16 pm
i been repeatedly assured, oh good isn't the 1st time of the 1st revelation. of course, a big political fall out from the revelations of political parties taking place a christmas party taking place at downing street last christmas. and that led to the resignation of allegra struts. and she was a spokeswoman who was caught on camera pretty much laughing about the situation she handed in her resignation. perhaps a political sacrifice of bars, johnson could keep his job. but as more and more of these revelations come out, there are few or fewer people who be willing to throw themselves on their swords. and eventually the question will be, will prime minister himself finally step down? what more will people ask in that to night? early we spoke to norma baker, a former home office minister believes that johnsons lost all credibility to color . we're meeting, it's a pathetic. i mean, it's not a word. was clearly a social event. so you know, he just, he just hanging on for grim life and hoping something will turn up. but his time is
2:17 pm
over at easter keaton. to go now i've got a sense of decency about him, the public. there are furious this, this cuts through every understand what's happened here. this is not at all. i'm off cane, westminster direct you. this is something which takes all the people, all the people who have been prevented from saying the loved ones from dying. preventive and go to funerals, not able to get married, not able to see relatives in care homes. meanwhile, the prime minister is having a party with other people in the, in the back garden of down the street. people on this on this issue very well. i'm the are furious. it's a grudging apology and he's only apologize because he'd been caught red handed up. so now he's been saying everything is hunky dory was following all the roles. thing to worry about, the prime minister has lost all credibility. he's lost the right to be prime minister. he's to resign. he's doing amends, damage the reputation as country ottomans damage to his own party. and i think it
2:18 pm
a party will take action in due course. well, a bit of advice. next, a british household struggling to heat their homes this winter major energy firm has told customers to cuddle their pet. undo star gems to try to stay warm bills are expected to double this year. will incomes will face a big squeeze. shot edwards dash. the next is more on the advice as go customers or follow up. you're weighing up anything or heating is sales or protected to sort of 2000 pounds a year. we'll know more as one of britain's biggest energy supply as has come up with no one idea, but 10 ways to save on heating cost, not to any layer up, get the hot right, going with install john. and if that doesn't work, how about a currency? it isn't cutter, where the cat. okay, i don't have a cat, but i do have this guy. another simple suggestion is to leave the often door open after cooking the capital of your kids, and eat
2:19 pm
a hearty bone of porridge. and of course, make sure you have a decent pair of folks or flippers. apparently all these simple cost effective ways to keep warm this winter. but the company copy serious candidate. i think they've completely lost the floss on that one. i have to go to the political one. why don't we need today? try and not on religiously free our in house because we're trying to get the cold down. you just think my, what else today, if that's true advice and you know i'd be slightly and salary by i mean i believe i know why would i need to stop my energy? done. i put an extra jump on in seminar. so yeah, i wouldn't want to be installed by any other company so that i wouldn't listen. so if they got fixed on contract, that would suit me. the advice as to customers comes as many households are extremely worried about rising energy costs. and despite that company apologizing
2:20 pm
for the l judge, suggestion politicians who criticize the coal halted approach. it is lawful and insulting. but then with this government's lack of an energy strategy, you almost expected those comments will be right by people who have to choose between eating and heating. if that's the state of the country we are now and i find it quite depressing. being told to put on a instead of turning on your heating, if you can't afford it, at a time of such difficulty for so many families is plainly offensive. 2022 has already been given the total year of the squeeze of the one since a 2008 financial crash this year. wages will barely quote one of the same time. 7 bill jumped by 50 percent around 2000 pounds when britain's new energy price cap is 2nd april. this means in real time, people actually get a pay cut. and the situation is for the cost of living catastrophe. i think the hosting's an abomination. we had the way to use that you could possibly have in
2:21 pm
business like whole support from the government. so we'd be forced to close our doors. we're only we're trying to close our way back. so we're hope hotel and everything else. we use quite a lot of electricity and it's to fi and i am terrified of the impact of businesses in the country. not just me. when i mean small businesses struggling, i just have to stop. we pay the bounce back government. and suppose that they gave us, but we've got to pay them back to order something and i'm not going to do that. it's time to money. we were in debt anyway from the lock that i now they energy cost of solar and both electricity and gas t. sorry. i don't know how we supposed to pay them because we have no income. and she is not alone. in fact,
2:22 pm
one and 3 people are worried that bills will become totally on affordable this year . and i'm thinking the government to for the bill. labor also piling on the pressure for the government to ditch tax hikes and scrap v a t on feel all together consent to ministers council, the 0 carbon homes program. they bond on show when development, they launch the eco installation program. they tore it up within one year, they were, you see, you case gosh, storage capacity. and it one particularly silly moment the current forensic, reclaim solar panels were risk to domestic food production for the all of these decisions that have made this country more dependent on volatile wholesale energy prices than we otherwise would have been. right now we noticed means as extremely situate, extremely difficult situation to really household, but also risks making archways the bridge industry and competitive a talk, a combination of spiking prices, tax hikes, the looming entity, big bills and the government's apparent reluctance to address these issues. may
2:23 pm
actually see ridiculous ideas like cuddling pats, how people overcome this, and the upcoming winters become a reality shot. edwards dashti r t london. so come as outs internationals well these at 10 continues. are they kevin o' in day to protection, is back in the headlines in europe as the block said, police agency is told to delete it, trove, of personal data. we're going to talk about that. i'm much more to tonight. thanks for checking in for the way. my rebates, going good off, brent. ah ah ah, is your media a reflection of reality?
2:24 pm
in the world transformed what will make you feel safer? isolation for community. are you going the right way? where are you being led somewhere? direct. what is true? what is great? in the world corrupted, you need to descend. ah, so join us in the depths will remain in the shallows. price fixing is the problem. if you want a free market, you've got all lead the market be free, you can have half of the market free. and then half the market fixed, do you end up with the problem that we have today? ah, i get the bbc's facing
2:25 pm
a fresh way the concerns about pushing woke issues. one of the british broadcast is longest having presented hold. a plugin is network radio show last month out to 46 years, maybe an obsession with diversity. my chill race telling us he was too frustrated to remain with bbc's woke agenda. it was a difficult series to record because of what one could call b. b. c woke the bbc suggested, or phone quietly insist that we include certain types of guest. obviously we, they were very came that we should have a balance of men and women and this has been the case for many, many guess better reasons. one has had been under pressure or wanted to be persuaded that one must house persons of color or ethnic minorities.
2:26 pm
and this particular series i was also told that we must have disabled people taking part. and so i went along with and i went along with the persons of color, etc. and i think they were all extremely goods people to have all the programs that i saw reacted against this prescription if you up. but we should have certain types of people on the program. my rule has always been that we should just have people who are right for the program who are trying to do it. and never mind that color is all that religion is having. so that is the basis that all spin whistleblower allegations, but a climate of fear at the b b. c over reporting on race and transgender issues with an inside is saying the broad customers employing overwhelming censorship. b. b. c . official phone repeatedly denied, catering to political bias within the organization, but he's failed to stop. so if it's a top faces leaving all that said one of them,
2:27 pm
physical broadcasting veteran andrew mar, quit up to 21 years thing he wanted to be free to speak. his views recently, while robin a can another highly experienced and they said he was fed up with a company's quote, institutionalized left is a natural race again, claiming the broadcast it is putting pressure on reporters in various fizz certainly in other areas. i'm not, this is in the entertainment area. i'm, i'm, i was working in, but obviously in the political field, i'm sure that these precious do come up all the time as to the people. that money is going to interview and the things that reporters and correspondence and so i can say, so i think that is going on. there is also sort of, i mean the media haven't changed out or exists since, since i've stuff back in the, in the 960, i mean, the tickler producer i was working with. the last says was 50 years
2:28 pm
younger than me. and she was very much into what you might go right on causes and so on. so 11 to be, she pushed those and i, i resisted up to a point, but anyway, it's all over now. use police agency euro pulse been ordered to delete a vast or a personal day to the security keeping unlawfully it comes off to a decision. but the block states protection agency privacy advocates already likened to repose activities to mass surveillance and competitive clandestine data harvesting to american national security agency, which whistle blow. edward snowden, of course, exposed. well, europe. oh, hold reportedly run this to the equivalent of hundreds of billions of pages of printed text. it stores dates on at least a quarter of a 1000000 current and former tera and serious crime suspects. what else's personal details of people with no established links to proven ality in ours to raise certain information held for more than 6 months than the date has been collected
2:29 pm
from criminal investigations carried up by national police authorities in e u countries. europe whole denies. it's abused as mandates and says the decision will hinder its data processing capabilities now to support low enforcement. the d . p. s decision will impact on euro polls, ability to analyze complex and large datasets at the request of a you law enforcement. cybersecurity expert we heard from says the decision won't make much difference though, actually is there's already an abundance of personal dates are available on media platforms. he says, speaking, i believe that is impossible to consider. our need completely private. have information that we do online is check in for the for the purposes data collection is essential to provide that better service. you send the truck to the user experience box, we can nothing your the side effects. for these reason, the rule of our privacy, which dogs and the privacy regulations facia,
2:30 pm
i believe that the media blackmore platforms are collect too much data. and we, we, we have seen many times the abuse of such data. many we see moreover for talking about at r c dot com our main site, but for now that soft international is world. these are 10 reporting for you, kevin, over here. thanks for keeping company. very good evening. ah, join me every thursday. i'm alex simon. show and i'll be speaking to guests in the world, the politic sport business. i'm show business. i'll see you then in the.
18 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1781091157)