ah, ah, tennis superstar of a joke of ish, a set to be deported from australia after court upholds the decision to cancel his fees, meaning he will miss the australian open, which gets underway on monday. in the new stores, the shade to wake high stakes talks over ye, crime between russia and nato have wrapped up with moscow. accusing the lines of trying to wind bank of the clock to the cold wolf. nato understands the principle of the in the visibility of security selectively. if nato applies a policy of containment against russia, moscow will have to take a counter with pant cuddle your pets and they start jumps. if you want to stay warm this winter, her nature of british energy company fails. the hate for it said vice swab fuel costs rocket. i think i've completely lost the thought on that. i have to say when

she paid fully free in our in house because we're trying to get the call down thing i was with hi there. thanks for joining me, watching the weekly here on our tape tennis. donovan joke of ich is set to be deported and miss the australian open after court upheld the decision to revoke his visa and a statement. the australian prime minister said the protection of the countries borders was paramount. i welcome the decision to keep our borders strong and keep australian safe. strong borders are fundamental to the australian way of life, as is the rule of law. our government has always understood this and has been prepared to take the decisions and actions necessary to protect the integrity of our borders. and he's done. hawkins is in the thing across this story for s. s a

staying across it and has been rumbly gone for quite some time. lots of twists and turns and, and court decisions. and i'm still not entirely sure what no joke of it did wrong just because up to date. well, not anymore. so thousands have been to the, in the online to see that court proceedings going on in australia, which of course, i've gone a gates joker bit. she's been ported his visa revoked and potentially facing a 3 year ban from engine las trailer. should this be confirmed? he's already said he will be appealing this decision that he will respect and comply with the court decision we built our planes. this is of course, the 2nd time his visa has been rejected the 1st time. about 10 days or so ago when entry was denied on the places of technicalities on the basis of how he filled in his entry form to australia, which already apologized for saying the arrows in his form was caused by his assistance. why theme it was simply human error administer barrow, and that was the 1st time his visa was revived. that, of course,

was successfully appealed why his legal team, when he was allowed to stay at this court case, is entirely different. alex walked straight. immigration minister use his personal powers to revoke his visa based on the job which is perceived. and i quote, again perceived as an icon to the anti vax movement. and his presence in was troia, could cause a danger of public health risk, even potentially inciting, civil unrest. from the anti vaccination movement. so as we heard that illustrated from one of those states in importance of protecting board is, as we said, quite what this has to do with protecting board is we're not sure because if this is about borders, why was he? of course, allowed to even traveled australia in the 1st place. this is to do with perception of course, many will say this sets a very dangerous precedent. somebody being deployed having to be revoked. and not because they posed an actual health risk. not that he's infect,

she's going to put people's health at risk. not because he is an anti baxa himself, literally proclaims these sorts of views. he stayed quite mute and quite willing to comment on his vaccination status, but because he is perceived to be by the authorities. so very interesting legal precedent here as well. yeah, i mean you, you've pretty much said it 11. that is the most selim point. i think is it just to remind people at home we're talking about somebody who's not being found guilty of any wrongdoing, because after the initial refusal of his visa, when that decision was overturned, the judge said, i do not see what more this man joke of it. could have done so he was allowed anyway, it was deemed that his application for visa was legal and that you said he's now been turned down. not because of anything that he's done wrong, but because one man has said not that you all something but i individuality. perceive you to be something precedent i would say rather alarming precedence and

said that, yeah, absolutely. and this decision has been as controversial device that has been attention grabbing people really are quite split on this literally australia across the whole world. really, one school saying rules are rules. we're in the middle of a pandemic. the rules are there for a reason, and nobody should be the exception here. all the people say, well, hang on a minute, rules the rules. but as you rightly pointed out, this man has done nothing wrong legally. this is again about how one person perceive seem to be perceived. well, yeah. why don't rules, but he hasn't broken any as far as i can. i can tell. well, absolutely, yeah, this is what's, what's cool, such a reaction not only of course in australia but in his hometown and joker bits himself has said he's extremely disappointed with this decision. he will cooperate, comply that when he's with the other tennis plays in the tournament lock, were yet to see a reaction for this latest decision. but when the scaffold began, of course we did see

a mass out flooring of support that sort of saw on the streets. ah, it people in his home town and his country firby are also perceiving him as very much share a victim or in all of this. not that he's being, ah, he's not being treated, as we say in accordance with rules as a rule breaker, as a law breaker, but very much being made a scapegoat and an image of something that he's not this, it was the reaction in baton, sub of old i am revolted and angry because i did not expect they would treat the world's best tennis player like this, but he did not deserve as ours was. additional are no longer with nobody's going through is the frustration of our entire nation disorder. if they had said from the beginning that only vaccinated people can participate, it would be, are a lot,

but at one point they tell him one thing, another time, something else. just the funny thing. this is pure politics. the issue here are the principles we live for, at least as europeans freedom, fraternity equality for you, mentally. placing this balls down alternately to probably 3 piece politics, principles and precedent. those are the 3 key focuses that the take away from this, this court decision laurel reaction on line as well. jacowitz' subject. a lot of means will be bringing us or our view as a lot of that throughout the day or both for and against the semester. what is certain for now is that he's not going to take part his dreams of winning his temp australian open are, are shattered. participating in is that 21st grand slam are unlikely he'll be able to put a spite, sir, for the next 3 years as well. due to that band, so we'll have to see what reaction that causes that throughout the world as that court decision goes public. done, hawkins with me being as their dad appreciate it. and thank you for the spring,

an independent journalist under a former tenant player himself, actually charlie boyle. good to have you on the line. charlie, let's talk about the 21st and foremost, then i'm sure you'll be able to empathize and sympathize with nova showcases joker, which is a situation that how big loss is this. first of all, to the australian open. hi, neil. daniel, thanks so much for having me. on my phone probably make it to products, i can get you out for a while. it's a massive loss. it's trailing regardless of what you think about the vaccinations. and i'd be saying for years the job. she's been in the best at site at some point and he's gone to sean injury free. it's just a work. it could possibly 3 or press 2 for the underground.

well, because, i mean this has been creeping up and be on the phone variances and he could well be looking for to get back to what she doesn't want to do health reasons, but i'll come onto or. busy you won't be buying any brand answer. well, i think i'd be spending a lot to get people to get the agree with it. i think visit the very dangerous precedent because they're always reasons why people call me back all the time or their medical exams. but the end of the day, they come into the country. that's the bottom line. yeah, i mean if you look online, you'll find all kinds of opinions. one of the ones that caught my eye was, it's the country you have to abide by the rules. but as i see, it hasn't actually broken any of the, the rules having, you know, one his 1st pale. this is a decision by one person which is the immigration minister. he's basically got that,

that magical baton of power and he's wielded it to veto joke of it. she's entry into the country. why do you think he would do that though? is this with a non election? because i'm trying to turn it as acetate. why would the immigration minutes to go out on a limb like this? well, i think it's, it's a mixture of politics for an election and just the general trying to nation and a company that's been locked down. and it's very strange in particular. so i'm expecting the judge's ruling joker ventures favor with my legal song based on possibly reading might argue that he did not care to become somebody this stranger, but that's not the reason give him give as well. by the way, i'm going to promote as you get opposite. i mean, he's never,

never been asked to just background on just a bit. you know, i use almost dying very much to the point where we get trying. and he had a very ne, intolerance degree, completely changed to many of them. and it's pretty much on the customer. and so that's on the back of the company was on country. he's got his own way of doing. he's very single minded and strength and weight weight and as well as a strength. i just think this whole thing is if he, you know, if he, if you don't want to come to australia, especially somebody about you know, everyone should be treated the site by the end of the game. so if i want, you shouldn't got to go straight. you should have a much more clear about just mr. just told him not to come all to get back to like everybody else, but it's the chopping and changing call. expect somebody to come across the world

and not until you are and then spend a week and job, which is another thing that maybe just needs clarification for 4 views. is that today's court decision, this was not a balanced assessment of those. now that joke of which deserve a visa or not, this was purely decision and of whether the immigration minister was in his rights to do what he's done right or wrong. they weren't assessing whether he was right to do it. just what he entitled to do. it the question they were answering was, was the decision of alex or the immigration minister? was it unlawful? was it irrational? was it legally unreasonable? so basically the, the balance was in his favor. they had to just see how didn't overstep the mark correctly. so it was more likely that they were going to find in the minister's favor was not i, i mean, when, when you get in there as well, you're always going to get judgment. i'm not saying that, i mean,

i mean it's very difficult. i mean, if you could look at 6 months from here, just give me an interesting one. i certainly don't even the ones that was joking, which was this barrier that the need that aren't on the ready light is getting to the point now it's actually a small amount of people know radio who may want to do controlling. and when that happens, when it comes and makes quotes on whatever, however you define is going to be less of a health issue because so many people, either benches or being vaccinated, so it doesn't make much difference. so just absolutely political on the job on a lot of things, i think is really screwed up because i think the way to be treated is absolutely outrages johnny. thanks so much for your time. speaking to independent journalist

charlie, boy, my guess now after the 1st caught her him victory in this saw go and joke of which was actually released from the detention center as we understand they might be back there. now. i'll tell you, had chance to speak to joe cabbage, his dad and uncle who both agree, the joke of it should be allowed to compete in the australian open. i can say in my name personally mean isolated, you know, and the, this is all him, you know, and on the other side, as you know, he has the. busy corona in december, you know, and the, this is not a medical reason to get the luck sign before a judge whether she has the full time, what all and he has under genie. and he's looking his blood real, real, really unhappy. and we are so sorry. we like to australian people, but the southern government didn't really wrong things to know. number one, in the,

in the dentist, one of the best force men ever, you know, this is, this is what he said that it's very fit to let me show you. sonya, i can't describe the feeling we never thought our son, the best tennis player in the world, would have had to go through this. especially in such a far away land, where he had already proven himself was the best 9 times. it's incredible that this has happened to him, but it has happened and it was in no way related to sports. it's all politics. he didn't deserve the visa refusal in the 1st place. we never had to deal with such politics. our politics is tennis. of course, we expect no fact to win his 21st grandson and his 10th australian open for it was a book of the kremlin, this demanding a written response from the united states to his proposed security guarantees, with a spokesperson stressing that the current tensions of ukraine pose and extreme danger . his remarks came after an in depth,

a conversation between russia and knighthood. the 1st day more than 2 years shall a debit. ski explains how do you solve a problem like russia, east under false weight is for a shot to deescalate. it is rational that has to make a start trice, the escalation and diplomacy, or confrontation and consequences. what was the view from us and nato, after they held a series of meetings with their russian counterparts. on the one hand, they repeatedly said that they were there to find solutions on the other. and that solution was some have suggested one sided. russia has to make giant strides towards them. do you think it's a military presence anyway? mean crane. if there is to be a d escalation of tensions for the russian delegation, the double speak was too much. we are fed up with loose

dog, half promises, misinterpretation of what happened, that different forms of negotiations have behind closed doors. we do not trust the other side. so to see we need iron clad. waterproof bulletproof, the legally binding guarantees not assurances, not safeguards guarantees. russia was also accused of not being serious about finding solutions to ease the frictions as it continued to deny its planning to invade ukraine. moscow savings for clear proposals before the meetings took place, outlining what assurances it wanted from the west for its own security. that crucially included nato slamming the door on membership to post soviet countries like ukraine, moscow old. so hit out that meters idea of security. it won't extend to non

members, should, in nato expansion doesn't solve any problems of security. it moves division, mind sort of doesn't remove them. so these are the other things to say. nathan larchmont is aggressive. absolutely not true. and nathan launch month has been a cornerstone for the spread of democracy and freedom across europe. molto regurgitated the line that it is not a threat to russia. moscow didn't agree to us and nato continued to conquer militarily. the territories of the countries included in the alliance in place offensive weapon systems. there. this directly poses a threat to the interests of the russian federation. a final stab was made it finding common ground in vienna, the organization for security and cooperation in europe, a supposedly neutral ground, where unfortunately, the language from country representatives was anything but it seems that the risk of war is always c area is now greater than ever

before in the last 30 years, the europeans also went down the smear campaign route, following a massive cyber attack and government sites in ukraine. the ease top diplomat tinting one can figure out who is behind this strike. the hackers have not yet been identified. and while the west continues to state it is spread democracy in put security to countries, rushes foreign minister disagrees. the west went too far. let's be frank in violation of all international obligations and common sense they chose to escalate this situation. well, you see the west condemns violent actions against civilians. they condemn human rights violations. but when bloody codes are carried out by those who swear their allegiance to the west, the west embraces them. this is what happened with the ukrainian qu. many people died there, including of the hands of provocateurs and this kid was approved by the united

states and the europeans just accepted that as fact. and no one is going to investigate the my down atrocities a mammoth week of talks has ended with well, a lot of hot air, no concrete proposals to move things forward. the only thing that they saw eye to eye on really was just how far apart they are and that it talks fail. the consequences could be catastrophic. gelatine. ski r t. amsterdam. we discuss the possibility of nato's expansion into former soviet states with a panel of guests ukraine and eva ga. willey would not be allowed to become a full fledged member of nato because they have internal divisions within their own countries. and that is stipulated in the atlantic alliance of nato itself. so until those comes, frozen, conflicts are resolved, and they cannot be admitted as

a member. but you have the united states and nato moving nato forces up to go up to the black sea area just opposite and wanting to go into ukraine and actually do military maneuvers with, with ukraine. and as well as georgia. and provide a so called defensive weapons, which easily could become offensive weapons. and this is, this is what moscow sees as a threat. it would be crazy for nato to get ukraine on board. it's a failed state. it is a finding full time and dangerous democracy in the making as the american say. and it could turn into real war effort. ukraine joins later. not because russia would do anything but simply because to hold heads in. yes, would do something stupid to be alliance should be responsible and not take anybody and within the alliance, believe me, several countries and not the small ones don't want ukraine. of course,

there is an image that needs to be projected of humanity, but it is not the case. and people realized in europe that it is very dangerous to have ukraine. and if only because of some of the whole hats in the west of the country that hey russia and i would do anything to stop the war. some advice for british households struggling to heat the homes this winter major energy provider ovo has told customers to cuddle your pets, and the star jumps to stay warm bills are expected to double the ship. incomes are expected to face a big squeeze his shot edges. dashti on the advice that got customers fired up. are you weighing up, eating or heating as bills are protected to sort of 2000 pounds a year for no more as one of britain's biggest energy suppliers has come up with no one idea. the 10 ways to save on heating cost, not only laira,

but get the hot rate going with. and if that doesn't work, how about a comes in is a cutter with a cat. okay, i don't have a cat, but i do have this guy and another central suggestion is to leave the oven door open after cooking, the capital of your kitchen and eat a hearty bowl of porridge. and of course, make sure you have a decent pair of socks or slippers. apparently, all these are simple cost effective ways to keep warm this winter. but the company can't be serious, can it? i think they've completely lost the flaws on that one. i have to say to discuss with them, we're not stupid. i, we, we, we are literally trying notes that i eating on really freeze in our, in house because we're trying to get the cost down. you just think my, what else besides today, if that's real advice then you know i'd be slightly and sorry bye i'm and i believe i know why with the event that i need to study my energy done for an extra jumper

on seminar. so yeah, i want to be in solid by the other company, but that doesn't say i, i wouldn't listen to if they got fixed on contract. that would suit me. the advice and the customers comes as many households are extremely worried about rising energy costs. and despite the company apologizing for the l, judge, suggestions, politicians have criticize the coal haunted approach. it is laughable and insulting . but then with this government's lack of an energy strategy, you almost expected those comments will be right by people who have to choose between eating and heating. if that's the state of the country we are now and i find it quite depressing. being told to put on a instead of turning on your heating, if you can't afford it, at the time of such difficulty for so many families is plainly offensive. 2022 has already been given the total year of the squeeze of a one since a 2008 financial crash this year. wages will barely quote one of the same time bill

just by 50 percent around 2000 pounds. when britain's new energy price cap is 2nd april, this means in real time people actually get a pay cut in the situation in the for the cost of living catastrophe. i think the hosting's an abomination. we had the way to use that you could possibly have been business local support from the government. so we've been forced to close our doors . we're only we're trying to close our weight back. so we're in a hotel and everything else. we use quite a lot of electricity and it's hacked fi and i am terrified of the impact of businesses in the country. not just me. when i mean small businesses struggling, i just have to stop. we pay the bounce back government and supposedly gave us. but we've got to pay them back to all of a sudden,

and i'm not going to do that. it's time to money and we were in debt anyway from the lock that i now they energy cost of solar and both electricity and gas t. sorry, i don't know how we supposed to pay them because we have no income and she's not alone. in fact, one in 3 people are worried that bills will become totally on affordable this year . and i'm thinking the government of the bill. labor also piling on the pressure for the government to ditch tax hikes and scrap v a t on feel all together consent to ministers council, the 0 carbon homes program. they bond on show when development, they lost the eco insulation program. they tore it up within one year. they were, you see, you case gas storage capacity. i don't want particularly silly movement. the current foreign secretary claim solar panels were risks to domestic food production . all of these decisions have made this country more dependent on volatile wholesale energy prices than we otherwise would have been right now. we know this

means as extremely situate, extremely difficult situation to really household. we're also risks making archways . the british industry and competitive talk a combination of spiking prices, tax hikes, the looming entity, big bills and the government's apparent reluctance to address these issues. may actually see ridiculous ideas like cuddling pat, how people overcome this, and the upcoming winters become a reality. shock. edwards dusty r t london. well, soaring energy bills, not the only issue, the u. k. government faces families of those who died during the height of the you case. first covey lockdown have slammed an apology from prime minister johnson as an insult. that's after he admitted in parliament despite severe restrictions on gatherings back then that he had attended a busy downing street bash. he'll position even signatories of since powered the pressure on the p. m. and summer,

calling for him to go to train service here. and he said to the that he was, i don't think he can continue as a leader, the concert, to parking prime minister, asking people to follow the rules again until his government reached it. when i went into that garden, just after 6 on the 28th of may, 2020, i believed implicitly that this was a work event. on may 2020 was a challenging months. a bit much of the country paralyzed by the 1st national lockdown in door meetings between households was strictly prohibited. a maximum of 2 people could meet outdoors in a public place. we spoke to a man who struggled to, to arrange his father's funeral amid those restrictions. this is about rules and about who the was applying to become abundantly clear that the prime minister thinks that they didn't apply to him at the same time, but i was at my father's funeral. he was taking part in a, bring your own booth party number 10 downing street. my gods team will be allowed

to invite up to 5 people at the geno. say that meant it was just myself and my siblings could attend. there is no physical contract. so we went lots of hunk each other. even the vicar holding the ceremony wasn't allowed to shake hands or anything like that. and as soon as the ceremony was over, we all had to go back, came again. they were author, issue in buying for people meeting outside people will be buying money for meeting up people being harassed by the police. if they hung around and parks that too long and the ultimate question, half of the prime minister is, why does he believe that the rules that he helped create he made didn't apply to him? or johnson stated, excuse his sponsor, a wave of names on line major companies to like roy an air of been involved posting mocking images. and it's not the 1st part of a scandal involving johnson at the end of last year, pitches most on line, allegedly showing him taking part in several social events that down the street in

the 2020 locked down goals for the prime ministers to step down had been mounting, it is so ridiculous that is actually offensive to the press. you see now going to do the decent thing and reside how stupid does the prime minister think the british people are. and now he's making fools of every single mp. oops, it him earlier, bullet prime minister. finally, do the decent thing. i'm resign oral historian. peace be forced to show him the door in issue for once kind of prime us for do the honorable thing and resign. 17 april shane of p. punch. got one think going to play manufactured step down and eventually you can do, you know, as go retain play manager he sorry, because he's being cool or any most resign.