risk we rate rate did. antony blink and re traded his position about the right to choose alliances. and as i've mentioned, i just wonder how the u. s. has going to feel at sub legation on there. they always see next to the right to choose their lines. it was endorsed the highest level of this obligation not to strengthen any security at the expands of other countries social security. he promised me to explain how the us interprets these obligations . there's, like i said, that's not the end of our dialect. next week, we are going to receive the new b, which has anthony blink and said, we will get the written response process. and as for our principal stance, it's also non expansion, nato. a lot of people ask why, because this blog, it was established as a block against the soviet union, and now it's operating against the russian federation, and it's in their doctrines. so i will give you an example of when eastern

europeans, 1st of all, on the poland bound country is one they really aspire to be a part of native we were in the west that they will be making a mistake. does that it's not going to strengthen the security of nato for the members, and it will extend skinless training unless they get in your rapid extremity sentiments. we were told otherwise. now the other way around the world are these issues agree to them. joining nato and all this phobia from soviet time is, will calm down and they will become your con, good neighbors mentions everything happened the other way around a sick and there is a fabi minority lab by these particular countries calling states and colon. first of all, you want to be come, so use this. they don't make to peek over them to continue to this is anti russian policy regarding all matters regarding all this areas and this policy will lead to nowhere. so i urge st and to be more accurate about the fact

that he stayed because of an off his best here. mr. labrat in your opening remarks . mister blink and threatened that there will be a reply of the questionable go one with ukraine. so the next week they will give you their response in rate and so we can already understand the tone they take or am i mistaken and disregard? i have already said that somebody comes because you, what you do now are american counterparts tried to make ukraine main. think about this entire process. it seemed to me that oper we explained ourselves to each other and they, which well, because they still have their concerns as they put it. and they understood that we should rather concentrate on our proposal. sure. and we were promised once again, i would like to emphasize they, as we were promised to give us reaction and written to our proposals, because i'm almost confident that one way or another is they will imagine ukraine

there as well. but i didn't hear a single argument scoop was that word, discharge, as foundation for the american stance about what is happening at the rushing ukrainian border. only concerns, concerns, concerns and concerns. again, our concerns about not some trumped up threads. bout drill with back, but no one is hiding that they are pumping in weapons. see ukraine, that they are directing 100, solve the military instructors to ukraine, and now your appeal union, the one to create their own training military training commission at ukraine. so because they don't want to fall behind in this race, it would be an interesting turn of advance in the mission. so the european union, which seemingly the one to remind about themselves this way because so when there is some major talks happening, no one remembers them. yes,

we think that the ukrainian matter demands a lot of attention demands close attention. but we shouldn't really bring everything down to these issue because you're in security architecture is more than that are still both good and anthony blink and reaffirmed what president biden said about their willingness to help with the implementation of the main sca cords. and i urge him once again to use their influence decides of influence on the key regime to make them to add sensibly and to stop sabotaging these essential document that should put and then to this inter ukrainian conflict. do they need music? yes, that's really funny. oh, did you talk about the possible deployment of the military infrastructure of freshman cuba and venezuela and how seriously russia considers these options and how realistic? because these and the negotiate with the authority of those states and what is

their positions? we didn't talk about this today. so you mentioned that that's, that's not the last context. it was just a preliminary dialect, and you will continue talking and after rate and responses from the american side throw being you context could be there. and you saw me to discuss your responses from that doctor. and how did you comment the strengthening of ukraine? sending artillery ammo. must be human though the governor wanted to improve the relations. what government did you mean? check? republic. check. republic process. you just got everything in one basket because i've already forgotten the 1st question to ask you, is there a b, and use summit? russia you say low? like i said that we are still waiting for the official response in rape. much

didn't like on paper and not for that. we plan and you contact at our level. so let's not drawn ahead of the train president good in this, all of a traded to talk to president biden. and of course, some preparation has to be done for these kind of summit, and we must understand what should be the outcome if such, som, it should happen. your scope routes as far than you'd check government. yes, we hear what they say. we hear their statements. combat then we have to see if there are any concrete proposals, any concrete signs in our interaction, aim to toss, and i can coleman wide of skew. so you say use with our nato or you neighbor and start doing in regard. if ukraine we have warranty due to them that beyond leaves and you, my thing that keep regime is doing, they are speculating on where to go on board the system this way

up. and so they use these with the support from the western sponsors. as soon as these rissa fabi can tell you, russian actually is terry stops. it will be added into everyone that these free gym is up to. nothing minister are here, jimmy, he's associated press. thank you for taking my question. i think a lot of people in the world are very concerned about these conversations, like the one with mr. re upcoming and ms. sherman last week and the ones today that there can be some sort of progress that is being made today. you mentioned the written reposed, written response to the united states next week. could you characterize that for us, please? it's not a step in the right direction. do you see that as a concession from the united states and in how long as rush, you're going to be willing to wait for satisfactory answers? i'm sure, because it's slow. you want me to tell you everything to all but all the car. you know, this attempt to your words,

i'm not to break everything into all the detail, small the parts. i think that's the wrong place to do. i have already talked about what we talked, what we discussed and how we concluded our fruitful when we know for meaningful conversation, i can talk about if we are in the right path or not, we will understand this when we will get the american responds and written on paper to all the items of our for our proposal. so that's what i was doing my job. thank you for the chance to ask in the rush and state duma, they are now talking about the initiative to recognize lou ganske and don best republics. washington refuses to support their security guarantees initiated by moscow. will russia be ready to recognize l in there and d n r, which they didn't do, even though they had the referendum. i'm not going to speculate about this topic. the kremlin has already have their reaction as for the referendum. that's true.

that's right. with me. it was a turning point in the history of the system, ukraine in crisis, right? oper, bloody kootenai, and ty constitutional coups up a search and says fans the west is trying to avoid our questions. what actually happened there from the western point of view, because they are a threat to interpret the history of the ukrainian tragedy. these start by slow and then try me happen. and then the insurgents in douglas happened and we tried to remind them about billions. what about this agreement? peaceful agreement between the president, piano, college and positions for answer. thank you. endorsed france germany in poland. so number 3, and then the very next morning, opposition process violated that agreement. and they started making christopher big statement and they started demanding to keep russians out of try me. and then they

send me with them and fire to send their oper, dad, the crimea. so started at the rebellion and then they made their own the referendum had their own referendum as for don, them so. so you have to wrap random that to blaze both in donna's can lugens regions and those enough that it has been discuss seriously at the normandy for meeting rooms where we discussed the mystics agreement. and we were still asked by the leaders of the brands in germany and your school we. they wanted us to convince the leaders, so the don ask, can look, ask you to sign the main scan cord. so actually enough, as a matter of fact. so i'm going to get you to the bay man the normative or half way . so they ran down there, but it decisions about independence. because they thought that the mascot correct will be implemented from a to z. this, the 1st of all, they talked about the special status given to these territories and that these status will be a super late it in the constitution of ukraine. but it,

it in the context of decentralization. and the other thing is that absolute total amnesty and then the one you wanted to have with the election that's supposed to go somewhere. and because all this matters must be resolved. what stop in corporation, in accordance with gone, this can look and so that's where we are in regard to the status of these territories. and once again today, and when we get to my talk to the german 4 in the fairness ministry, and when we talk to frank counterparts, we always raised this question that it's high time to say that he's going to allow it to ripple and key for him. to do what they do and be sure, and they must for them to do not what they promised to do, but was what was endorsed by the security council from the friends you're in the micro, in a nuclear provide security odor density. again,

russia. what do you think about this? you did the propagation for you? any point? pretty good on the question class, then microns, sad within you, order against russia should be stablished yoga you propose and you hold her. thank you for iraq and you see it says to save wrong against wish i did that for you, your solution? the still i haven't heard is resident next on the announcing or wanting to create anything against russia. i know that private and micron is the most consistent with the advocate family is not human. there's not a numerical european union becoming more important after the, including the so called strategic autonomy of the european union. they are developing drafting,

one of the documentary that is called that and the strategic bearings. of course, we are following this process and there is a lot of influence from us. so there is a fallback with mars, and we were told that they will come down as soon as they join you. and that didn't happen the other way around happened. but i haven't never heard it ends by crying once you talk about the strategic autonomy of the european union. and we was also talking that there is need to send united against the russian federation. i think that was good on the center standing from the b, b. c. what says russia one most an unstable dependent ukraine, or a new sphere of influence in eastern europe. right, mr. in terms of, you know, we'll talk today about this invoice for a while and unstable ukraine, the streets in the fact that unless it is a factor of our common life,

political life yet, and you said business by this instability that we pick up the job. i'm sure that you being an experienced journalist, you understand where it comes from, where it stems from. just take a look at what is happening around the oppression to return to p if and now being that follow of his return. so the shout was changing, and as for the scares of influenza, when i asked tommy blink and today was a need, how can he, he's blaine mostly the fact that it oper our president of you have extend. we'll still use the c s t o charter to get held to suppress that. there is a very threat un publish unless from the outside and he started picking the probably collegial candidates down to explain why they did it in the detail. anything vital, it shows the mentality of the western community because they have full confidence

that they are exceptional and they can do whatever the one and the others can only act or if they get the permission to act. just luc video, see that those reality. so how does the european union behavior that he can get any of this, but you know, about the bus to assess are found on my table to use at the top of your math in european union. second 2018. she sat at the possible meeting all in the last years or permanent represented able to boca, at the you when she talked about the balkans. she sat directly. so i'm almost quoting her and you're able to say that when the european union is in this region, no one has to be there. no one else has to be there. so that's another example of the spheres of influence. the other example is that what is happening in eastern europe and the present, boeing the western balconies. now they try to convey countries that are not part of you or nato, so they are doing everything they can to shop them in nato. any you would be trying

to talk them immune to just a chance to having close relations with russia and china cabinet. is it, isn't it an attempt to impose their scare of plans because that influence exist because of the call that you can the persecuted by the colonial empire which you had and when the day colonization started, they really didn't want to lose this years of insolence and they started coming up with all kinds of ways to, to keep hold of these terry trees him so we can see it too. it is only how these series of influences valuable property are being lord exploring by these countries . and now they tried to drag up in your territory into various curious influence. and i was very open when i talked about these, when i talked with anthony blinking about theirs, and so sat to see that that ad olds grownups, are contest them to cruise. starting this contact which was tougher. no jewel,

whose you got the longer, i didn't know what, but we will be really grown up about the it will happen. adult stance regarding the zip really want to have a safe world. police issue from the point of view. what is going on with the climate change or other global trans terrorism rock traffic in health care issues as well? because now it basses kind of from such a huge dan tradition, and that's not the last condemning that's replacing. that's what we should deal with in standards, we are dealing with scope machine wide is basically coming down to the russian american relations. how does landscape feel? and his regime you proud to have a feel that's wrong. we don't want to have plans issues, but what nato is now doing? can ukraine, it goes to shells. mom that you were, nato considers ukraine as part of their scare of implants?

no, i get the show. could you pose of this listening issue, please stop the cameras. i can hear the question. yeah. well, the foreign ministry publicize the responses of the us for our proposals, if you get them prescriptively committee can. so we will have to ask american counterparts about the aside when you thought about these, but we don't have the reply or reply, but because it will be in their possession. so something they will hand as over. i think it will be a right thing to publicize their replies, and i will ask and, and you blinking for a bare permission. thank you. ok we just listen to the russian foreign minister survey love love ruled speaking to the press in geneva, that after his meeting with his american came to pass antony blink and engineering

. he said it last for an hour and a half that was planned because many of the discussions did taken place over the last few days. it actually laid the groundwork for this meeting. he said that the u . s. said he would give a written response to russia, demands about nato expansion. and he said after that written response been received by russia, they would then decide whether there should be further meetings. and he said quite explicitly, at the moment, we do not know whether, if we are on the right path or not. but he did pointed the president, putin is always happy to speak with president biden. now, when he was asked by russia is concerned about nato expansion. he said that he did put this to the blink and this afternoon, mister blink. and again made the point that it's all about a freedom of choice to which russia responded that that choice should not be made

if it affects the security of others. he went on to talk about western spheres of influence because he was asked by a b, b. c reporter, where the rush is activities around ukraine rule about increasing russia sphere of influence. but he says, you can quite clearly see that nato activities and focus on ukraine, a rule about nato's sphere of influence. so that's a summary of what was said over the last half hour or so at that press conference. and it followed a 90 minute meeting between target lab growth and anthony bring can as well this afternoon that took place in geneva. now we did speak to the head of the russian delegation for military security in arms control based in vienna about all of this. and he says that is not the 1st time rush was trying to make his position clear for the united states. listen to our purpose, you giving us to the ukraine and it provokes conflict on the border

border. we don't boss in that public system every day and just on our like can make all the small groups about one according to our international obligations, and we don't in rate ukraine. we don't need these that i wrote down, radiate discussing these proposals. well, the atmosphere surrounding the negotiations has been strained with the u. s. establishment trying to spin its narratives against russia. with baseless accusations. and by denying objective facts, at least that according to russia's ambassador to the united states, washington continues to inflate a bubble based on unfounded allegations and still denies the facts about what is happening in ukraine, calling these facts miss of russia propaganda. what's truly surprising is a scale of verbal interventions from our american partners ahead of talks in geneva

. it seems to us as preparing the ground to switch the discussion from security guarantees in europe to the notorious russian aggression against ukraine. meanwhile, the u. s. department of state has outlined what sites and examples of russian disinclination in a report that presents its opinions though solid facts and the keys is russia of trying to shape the public's view surrounding ukraine. 6 in russia's deployment of combat forces is a mere reposition of troops on his own territory. fact deploying more than a $100000.00 russian troops, including battle hardened corporate forces and offensive weaponry. with no plausible innocuous explanation to the borders of a country that russia has previously invaded and still occupied in places is no mere troop rotation. it has a clear, a renewed russia threats to ukraine, sovereignty in territorial integrity. there are passages full of inhuman force hid hands, stupidity, for example. they call fake moscow statement that the repositioning of russian

troops and russian territory means repositioning of russian troops on russian territory. brilliant. what is there more hair lies or illiteracy? i did not even want to deal with it. i know one thing for sure. this could only be published by the ministry of truth. what we spoke with european political analyst and economist, i key hammer who says that the us government's interest don't represent those of the general public, especially in europe. if you, if you overly, say what you want as, as washington, people say no, no, no, we are not on the boat. we don't, we don't join you. we don't help you supporting these big interests of black rock in the military, industrial complex to support you. we are not, we are not in for that. it's especially not in the case of a war. we are not. so parking is in germany and europe once p and the business interests of these few groups who seem to be ruthless in this case is not in the

interest of the people. so you have to spin, you have to do pay news and you have to close the proper ground up front. and that's why all the media who are independent are a danger for them because they come up with as you set the arguments, whether people find out pretty quickly. know that the, what the media tells what the mainstream you get tells us is fate. what the independent media tells us this makes much more sense. while even this channel party has become the target evacuations from washington, with the us state department alleging that the channel and the fellow news that net sputnik uses disinformation to advance rushes foreign policy with more on that is more gas mother there, the latest allegations washington, periodically comes out with, with new reports, with new investigations into r, t a nab, almost always regurgitated things that they've said before. at least this time we

with the we didn't have a senate hearing with, with serious men and stars and stripes discussing an r t video about a statue receiving too many views that has happened before ellis, this time, the gist of it is that washington has come out and said that, look, media that is independent and free and generally aligned values, the interests of washington at these, when they report on something it is, it is news, it is unbiased. it is, it is balanced. when r t reports on the same thing, it is propaganda. and this information, this, this is the gist of what they have said. they have listed the all sorts of examples where they believe that r t has a twisted and twisted facts or twisted news or narrative. for example, we, we had an incident where they talked about ortiz critical coverage of the european union's response. initial response to the pandemic,

which is hugo completely justified you had the president of the european commission come out herself also on the line and apologize, issue heartfelt apology to 700000000 european citizens who were left disappointed with that with the european union's response and reporting on this somehow in the eyes of washington or the state department is propaganda. and this information, there was also an interesting bit where they compared our t and student to, to be b, c, and voice of america, voice of america, which until up until 2013 was forbidden from broadcasting in the united states. because there was an understanding that it is propaganda intended for foreign consumption because it is unhealthy for americans up until 202000 sorry, and 30 of all manner of insiders and, and former employees of was america come out and say,

over the years that guess it is essentially funded by congress an arm of congress. nevertheless, the, this is opposed to charge for them. a journalist. there's also it is very interesting bit about weekend leeks. when colleagues, by the way, which has never published alive, which is statistically more accurate and more dependable than that, almost any media outlets in the world be at cnn, bbc or we have an r t at statistically they have never published a life so. so here, the problem, the question that has this is they allege, and this is a live they alleged that are te, published a wiki leaks expos, 8 information about a new data done before weekly leaks did, which is a lie that's been debunked for years. what happened is we can, it's published approve of a new information, and they forgot that they forgot to on twitter to announce it r t announced that because they saw it on their side and and for years washington

has started this put the r t published weekly information before we can extend, which is an outright lie so you can understand the general level of fact checking in. in this report, there was also a bit about turkey saying that russian coverage, russian media, cat coverage of turkey before a short shot down a russian jet, was neutral after it's or shot down a russian jet. it was negative. well, was that surprising? imagine mexico shooting down an american jet. what would american media say or say someone else shooting down a british jet? can you imagine the headlines of, on the daily mail, for example. nevertheless, this is, this is the latest dump from the americans and their latest investigation into r, t and, and boot nig. but it is much the same as it has been in past years. okay,

well let's go back to our top story because some days crucial security talk from russia. foreign minister and his american counterpart have concluded in geneva, and we've been listening to over the last few minutes, sir. i'm from sir again. i've rav aback, say, exactly what was sat, said during that meeting, and at the press conference following that, her, our correspondent pietro oliver, was there, and he joins us, sir. now this afternoon, good afternoon, t peter, just run through them. what some pseg oliver of told the proline b yeah, the foreign ministers press conference, just wrapping up there it is completed, and we're still waiting to hear what the, the u. s. secretary estate had to say following that meeting between the 2. really the, the messaging coming from so g allow for of, was this and there were reasons to be reasonably cheerful, i guess, coming from it that there was there, going to be looking ahead to statements that they're expecting from the united states. they hope to hear from the united states in the next week concerning the

security and requests from russia for the whole of europe, for the future of european security. now, in the past, the u. s. is being reticent about providing written responses to those requests. some of the things that have been on rushes want lists and the u. s. has said publicly that they're, they're not prepared to enter into and they didn't want to put them down on paper because that would cause problems for future diplomacy. it would seem that, and one of the things that said to allow for av did say, is that the u. s. has an understood, did russia's concerns go beyond ukraine itself and our to do with security across europe. and that there needs to be some form of new european security framework put in place to waiting to see of course, what that response from the united states is certainly allow for of did say whether that response would be published would depend on what the response was.