yes, those are pretty weaker, clear from a brush up seduction to start the new bruise . ah, are useful me thing with a candid exchange of opinions at a critical moment. that's how the russian u. s. foreign policy sheets describe their talks in geneva. they come across from a rising tensions, i will ukraine and nato expansion. we recently notified congress of our intent to deliver and 17 helicopters. the white house announces it's sending military helicopters, the ukraine, just to ours, off of the escalation folks with russia. other nato members are also ramping up weapons supplies to keep such a scroll through a couple of random pages and to be sure, none of the provisions stand on any critical analysis you would in many cases,

it is simply a news conference off the top level for lashes out at u. s. officials and mainstream media pushing fresh unproven claims against moscow will examine those claims. this allen with from oscar. thanks for joining us tonight. archie international and daniel hawkins review of this l. welcome to the program. now the top diplomat, so russia and the united states have finished their security talks in switzerland as tensions over ukraine remain high. washington is expected to provide wall scale with a written response to the criminals concerns. next week ortiz piece, all of the reports from geneva. so rob, so here in geneva, and we've now got a much clearer picture of exactly how both the us and russian side see these talks having gone. we heard from said again are for off the russian foreign minister who

described them as useful and constructive. we heard from anthony blink in the u. s . secretary of state who said that they were frank and substances. we'll start with the russian foreign minister said gala for of low. he was 1st to give his press conference. after the meeting wrapped up, he said that washington had promised to provide an answer in writing to security concerns that had been presented by moscow to their u. s. partners. now he said that leave one just security concerns focusing on ukraine. they were for the wider european area. he said that the future of these talks would depend on the response from the united states there. but he said that the diplomatic doors pretty much remained open. it's worth pointing out. there was no major movement on any of the, the big sticking points during and these talk certainly what the representatives thief, a foreign minister and the secretary of state had to say that was tow major and tectonic shifts in where the risk respective countries stand. what we did here

though, from the russian foreign minister, as he addressed questions from the u. s. media with him say that there was no intention from moscow for them to invade ukraine at any time. why is russia doing this now? why do you feel that you need to make these troop deployments? now, what really the security posture of the u. s. a. nato really hasn't changed over the past couple of years. my store seemed to grow minute of focus. i think the u. s . state department should analyze the methods of cnn in regard to accuracy. you say we're going to attack ukraine despite our multiple explanations that when once for saying this will happen, you then asked why now, when do we not attack? it's a strange question so, so, so we've caused repeated all fundamental point that never ending nato expansion to east should be still too. anthony blinking repeated his position on the right to choose alliances, asked him how the u. s. plans to follow its obligation not to strengthen some of the security at the expense of the security of others. he promised to explain the

us position on zillow. well said galen, for all press conference was followed up with one from u. s. secretary of state anthony, blinking the u. s. chief diplomat saying that the diplomatic route remained open to finding a solution for the tensions between russia and the west. right now. he said that he received the sure answers from said gail, after all, the russia had no intention of invading ukraine at this moment. he said he would receive those assurances in the hospital as well for that, if the actions of russia didn't match up to that, then that would be a response from the united states and its allies and not response would be swift, severe, and united. he said that there will be a response from washington to those concerns that were voiced by m moscow and that response will be coming in the next week. he also said that there's ways and means available to take the heat out of the current situation. transparency, confidence,

building measures, military exercises, arms control agreements. these are all things that we've actually done in the past . and that if a address seriously can, i believe reduce tensions and address some of the, some of the concerns while the you, a secretary of state also sketched out a potential timeline of where we could be going next. he said that once they've responded to moscow, he would expect that that would be further me think that the foreign ministerial level, perhaps here in geneva. and if those meetings went well, that that could be another meeting between president putin and president biden, perhaps face to face, perhaps here in geneva, repeat. so what we sold last year, which took place in the swiss city. what we have seen though is a continuation, a willingness to continue the dialogue, go over these ongoing tensions between russia and the west. well, the us will now provide m 17 military helicopters to key of the announcement comes,

your style is off the top level of security talks with russia, where the us secretary of state claimed he wanted to de escalate tensions over ukraine. i would note that the united states has delivered more security assistance to grant in the last year than any point in history. these deliveries are ongoing, including today there's more deliveries coming. we recently notified congress of our intent to deliver and 17 helicopters live now to what is caleb open for the latest? caleb, thanks for staying across the story. hard. really to see how this move can be seen by moscow, at least from the side as anything but ramping up for of tensions. or given the timing those negotiations ongoing. that could well have an impact. sure. just hours after this high level meeting and already we have the united states increasing military aid to ukraine. and let's remember that if this meeting we heard russia basically be urged by the united states to withdraw troops from its

own soil. quite a situation now, the helicopter is that the u. s. a is providing these helicopters are actually already in ukraine for maintenance there from the now just last afghan army. and apparently the united states is going ahead and providing these military helicopters to ukraine. now it's also important to be aware of the fact that 3 baltic states, estonia, latvia and lithuania, have announced that they will be supplying lethal weapons to ukraine. this includes javelin, anti tank guided missiles. they're going to be providing those to the ukraine. they'll be providing them with us, support us approval. this is what they said estonia, nazi and lets you ania and the allies of working together expeditiously to hand over security assistance to ukraine. this aid will further enhance ukraine's capability to defend its territory and population in case of possible russian

aggression. but there's quite a rift among the united states and its allies. here we have germany, a long time important nato ally of the united states saying that they will not be allowing permits for the transport of, of weapons. there are estonian weapons based in germany and they won't allow them to be transported to ukraine. and we actually have the chancellor of germany speaking up and saying germany does not approve of the sending of lethal weapons to ukraine. this is what we heard. the federal government has had a clear stance regarding arms exports in recent years. we have not supported the export of lethal weapons from germany. now moscow still expects that the security concerns that they raised with washington should be addressed. but these current moves from the united states, increasing military escalation, are certainly not using tensions anymore from the law,

from new york. thanks for that up. and while a former us marine corps intelligence officer says, the what now says bowing to domestic politicking by ramping up pretensions with russia. if you don't, should leave a weapons in the united states. that opens up joe biden to criticism from congress at a time when he needs congressional support for domestic programs. so, were seniors, the consequences of allowing your foreign policy, your national security policy, would be hijacked by domestic. we'll compare the fact that tony blinking his meeting with lab rob to discuss a diplomatic off ramp for the current crisis. at the same time, the united states is green lighting of the delivery of weapons for the sole purpose of killing russia. because you don't have deterrence, unless you have a real capability, it's totally counterproductive and it undermines the american position when they say, hey, you know, we won't allow nato to join for years. you don't need to worry about it. what's the

difference between a ukraine that's a member of nato receiving western military and ukraine, who's not a member of nato receiving western military from the russia perspective. there is no difference. what talks the site, the palm of this outline, what it science is example the russian disinformation and report that presents its opinions as follows. facts. it was probably just a couple of hours before the talks rushes for a minute. there was critical of both the content and its timing it to my you got it, was it, but then leave documents which the u. s. department has of course prepare deliberately for today's meeting was more simply impossible to read the study of to scroll through a couple of random pages to be sure none of the provisions done. any critical analysis would be in many cases, simply a line. while among the devious claims and the reporters, that nato is not encircling russia with its military bases. it argues that the real problem is that russia is just a big country with more on the story. his more,

i guess, if well, over the past 24 hours, washington has launch something of a, of a p r offensive, or they, they've come out. and they've said that virtually are all the security concerns that russia has talked and talked about for 10 years for even longer than a decade. that all of that ease ease fiction. they've come up with, with a list of various things that russia has said that russia feels uncomfortable about who concerned about and explain why those points shouldn't be taken seriously. fiction rushes, deployment of combat forces is a mirror position of troops on its own territory. fact deploying more than a $100000.00 russian troops, including battle hardened corporate forces and offensive weaponry, with no plausible innocuous explanation to the borders of a country that russia has previously invaded and still occupies in places is no mere troop rotation. it is a clear, renewed russian threats to ukraine sovereignty and territorial integrity. there is,

of course, no mention of the fact that the russian troop buildup happen concurrently with the ukrainian to build up with the vase convoys of tags of artillery thesis, making their way towards the russian border towards easton ukraine and the conflict lines. the conflict lines there, and the gist of that statement, for example, is that the united states is concerned with the russian troops moving inside russia . whereas rushes concerned with troops from florida, from march, canada being sent half the world away, and stationed near russia as a you can understand where rushes coming from here. but there's a, there's a whole lot more where that came from. there are passages full of inhuman falls hit and stupidity. for example, they call fake mosque a statement that the re positioning of russian troops in russian territory means

repositioning of russian troops on russian territory. brilliant. what is there more hair lies or illiteracy? i did not even want to deal with it. i know one thing for sure. this could only be published by the ministry of truth. similar situation would be, what her coming out and hysterically condemning a united states to build up in texas for example. there was, there were many other points such as another one, a fiction, or russian fiction is that nato was surrounding washer. and here they argue that, that no, it isn't. rush was a huge country with, with $1414.00 neighbors that a chairs, landlord to women, and only 5 of those a native states. well, if we look back 20 years, there was only one. then there were 3, then there were 5. and now with the essential potential ascension of, of george and ukraine in the future, i wrote about half of russia's, lambert, neighbors would be nato member states. so how can,

how can you argue that nato isn't surrounding russia would, but you have the numbers right, that there was also another, another russian fiction. the new wouldn't promised russia that nater wouldn't mix pad eastwards. this is, this is an outright lie. this is an in c, i and state department in european archives that yes they did. it's, it's in writing and a cia archives, for example. then director of the cia director robert gates said the gorbachev's had been promised to be led to believe that nathan wouldn't expect this, but you had the james bake of the state department, the head of the state department, secretary of state back then i 3 times telling gorbachev's that they wouldn't move . one inch eastwood. you had a vendor of the then west german foreign minister and the 3 games saying that nato shouldn't expand eastward, given assurances to russia. then the usaa,

that the in the event of germany re unifying that neither would movies. you have this in writing in rising. liza archived, memos, cables. nevertheless, there's this, as i say, much more in that least of russian fictions which a lot of questions about. well, auntie itself has also become the target of washington's accusations. whether you are state department alleging the channel and felonies out at sport accused this information to advance a cremeans foreign policy got reaction from arte host and former british and p. george galloway. the timing of the launch of this report is naked lay sign that that's part of our new propaganda offensive, but i have had the. 2 unpleasant task of reading all 33 pages of it, of the people that have lied to us over and over again. i'm now lying to us about ukraine and russia. those market for it. there is an audience for it,

but fewer and fewer people are believing these lies than ever before. thanks to the existence of our teeth, the existence of social media. people can find out the truth just with letting their fingers do the walking. more and more of them are us how speak and nancy pelosi has been accused of a cynical utah office. you back to bottle stock market trading, but all mike is despite her family topping the list of democrats, profiting from the much the source practice critics. the notes he's hoping to divert growing angered officials profiting from inside information while the morning the supreme court members are also banned from fighting stalks to give a blanket attitude if we can't do this and we can't do that because we can't be trusted. i just don't buy into that, but if members want to do that, i'm ok with that. if we're saying everybody should be living by the same standard, then lead, so be it. that's okay with me. but i don't think that the court should be let off

the hook. so i say when we go forward with anything, let's take the supreme court with us to have disclosure husband pool of focus it more than 5000000 dollars from tommy, based on google's parent company, just before house just lation, seen a soft on big tech was passed nancy pelosi spokesperson insisted she had no knowledge of the transactions, but her husband's investment judgment has proven so uncanny over the years that many traders simply copy his picks to maximize profits. well now to senate democrats, i propose the bill to ban sitting members of congress from stock trading. it is oral director of the reaction we times new site says pelosi publicly backs of ban, but politicians like her will never pass legislation. am a fan of this proposed legislation. nancy pelosi herself is kind of flip flopped and been on both sides of this. i think it's because, you know, she's a politician and people are right now in favor of this unusual legislation. all

these politicians can beat their chat and say that this is a good idea of what they come down to the floor. they're never going to vote for it . it's completely unethical for members of congress to use the inside baseball that they have as it would be ignoring, you know, in boyish to not believe that they're not using the inside information that they already have to go ahead and profit on the stock market. members of congress have a direct effect on regulation and which companies get the certain regulations which industry kind of get a push from the government and a little government subsidy asian. so you can kind of play the crystal ball in terms of the stock market. congress members have joined the public to blast the us internal revenue services, new demand to use a 3rd party facial recognition for tax returns with one congressman warning, this is not america, this is america,

not china. the iris insists the i d dot me up is secure and required for all services. taxpayers, though, points out clear potential for abuse and other functions sharing with other government agencies breaking the i r s are now trying to require facial recognition to view your tax returns. this is america, not china. you mean there is a problem with id theft for tax returns, but not for voting ballots. thank you senator. especially given what we know about the i r. s ability to share data with other federal agencies. i see the f, b i, d, e, a, etc. this is essentially creating mandated u. s. government facial recognition database that will inevitably be abused. band facial recognition. the host of the politics politics, politics, podcast told us the r f as a warring record when it comes to data protection. the iris has had

a problem and it's been a very, very serious problem in terms of data theft and it was way too easy to access somebody's backpacks is that essentially gives away the golden goose in terms of somebody being able to impersonate you on line to the federal government has already done an extraordinarily poor job of securing our data, whether id me remains a top to your vendor for which maintains their relationships with both states and federal government. that is something that, again, we do need to make sure that we keep a vigilant ion. but as for assurances, look, this is the internet. it is a dirty place and people can get pretty much whatever they want. if you are insecure and many of us are us ideation regulators have been forced to run through new airport learning technology off a top add ons warned of a catastrophe from interference by new 5 to mobile networks of the airline bosses

said farms you networks could ground planes, the federal aviation administration approved new to meters that allow landings and low but if you conditions, major of like carriers from british airways, lufthansa had already changed or cancel flights over the issue. because the proposed 5 g deployment involves a new combination of power levels, frequencies proximity to flight operations, and other factors. the f a will need to impose restrictions on flight operations using certain types of radar al, to meet or equipment close to antennas. and 5 g networks us part of jason cronies says they use use a huge worry for the asian community. the aviation community thinks this is a huge problem. basically because there is a potential degradation of safety if we're not confident that we can fly in a safe environment we want. and so it's going to lead to more cancellations than we've already seen. 5, g is, is it a lot of different countries around the world has already been implemented in and

around airports? the difference that we're seeing in the international part is that the 5 g internals are at different angles and using different power levels. and they do in the united states. and so when they're being turned on in the united states they're, that's what's causing this interference and the report or claim. but the form of pope benedict to the 16 failed to take action. and 4 cases of alleged sexual abuse was serving as archbishop of the german cities of munich and fries in the study by german law firm looked into cases of abuse between 945 and 2019. and how church officials handled them. according to report over 2 thirds of people investigated, turned out to be priests. the report also said the form of pope supported this latest inquiry but denied any wrong doing. we spoke with wilford for someone who says he was a victim of sex abuse by the clergy during that period. he told us what he's been

through. that's why someone it happened in the summer of 979. that was 11 years old . after act served at st. andrew's church and when he left us and the people started attacking me for the new, i was one of the reasons he left. we moved to another district of the town and in 1999. i began effective by my experience. i could not work and then i have this in the i could not drive or simply go out of the house if my whole family was suffering because of that, i started visiting doctors to find out what the problem was. finally, i got to see a cycle therapist. i told him the whole story and he said i had been through a really traumatic experience in that triggered memories of all the abuse. i had experience hard when i saw the pastor immunity, he was standing among other pastor smiling. i told myself, listen paraphilias disease. so he'll most likely keep going. he did find out. it's not the 1st time that senior catholic clergyman has been under far over alleged sexual abuse. numerous, all the cases have been reported in other german cities, including honor of france as well will for someone again say that soft,

his letter pope benedict did change punishment guidelines for clergy guilty of sex offences, but says it's taken too long to take life. when do i see what i told me? 2006 in 2008, i sent an honest email. send me an diocese. i wrote about my experiences with pastor acts when he was innocent. they ignored my letter in 2006 from so i tried again in 2008 when abuse victims were demanding compensation for the 1st time. they then describe my letter as criminal blackmail, hassle, but it's clear that i hadn't been black mailing the church. those officials who came to me released i was a victim right away if they also realized they themselves had been used by the church. they were simply fooled by the mouse. first of all concerned about justice because the pastor just went to another place when i was writing the letter, it was important to me to protect others. nick in may. 2010. i wrote to pope benedict. i told him my whole story on may 21st. i got a response saying the pope would take care of it and he really did. but as we have seen, it took 2530 years for them to open up today and start talking to him. i have lacked

one is sophie and co with fisheries up next, that we're back in half an hour with the very latest to join us again on our teens . had asked, ah, gothic foot by the ethanol francisco to coordinate the police, keep it going to push and push it if i heard of it. but there should somebody been somebody from a few minutes but, but it was 3 to what i still love with it. at the but adults ah, medical me and boom, here's to prevent you believe about giving you hope. all right, so, um, would you what would be with you a thumbnail? what this was back up on your was that you wild like but pipper roper. oh, but a weaker lia from a brush up for darkness that are lenient. booze

. oh is your media a reflection of reality? in the world transformed what will make you feel safe for? hi selection for community? are you going the right way, or are you being led to somewhere? which direction? what is true? wharf is great. in the world corrupted, you need to descend. ah, so join us in the depths or remain in the shallows.

is the earth still large enough to satisfy the ambitions of jeff bezos? you know, it's got its tentacles in so many aspects of the economy. there's nothing that amazon is i'm trying to get into to step by step. the amazon empire has extended its group on the world that walks like a duck, inquired like a dog as a dog. so amazon looks like monopoly trades like a monopoly makes money like monopoly behaves like monopoly. amazon essentially controls the market place. it's not really a market as a private arena, a world where a single company controls the distribution of all our daily products. and the infrastructure of our economy is loose the world according to amazon. let me look now. look, we're in fact will you? i lisa typical, there is only 9, but already a university. students that away on special effects that are thinking about this

back on august the teams and you must appointment. let's see. yep. you got the floss, there's doors to deal with them, get it. and i am not able to able to go over, but yeah, but that's a little form with up. yes. so the loss of his mother, his number is ported. yahoo tell him that he may come come, no recalls. he really shows how much was going to program, use them now. bush night, nebraska, of course with level you're special about the yeah my what i'd say the 1st grade of course. sure. at the player that was the killer push him was a new mom. should miss on delivery. well use for wi little was as much color nuge with soon losing credibility to the to room. when you most of church leave you on could be from his teacher or was also reason is balise. we'll go to the good. 6 ah

oh, going to sophie co visionaries, me sophie, schubert not say well theoretical and particle physics continues to be mysterious, almost an occult science and the more you try to figure out our reality, the more confusing and counter obvious a guess what i talk to noble prize winning physicist, professor heather at hoffman today. professor hoop, thank you very much for agreeing to talk to us. that's my pleasure. we did an interview, but we couldn't see each other because it was over the satellite. so i'm very glad that we're able to do this live and in person. our last i, we were speaking about black holes. this time, since we're meeting face to face, i thought i would ask you all the big questions. because i don't know, and i'm going to see you next. so let's start with this. you are noble crisis for

studying electro week interactions. the 4 grade interactions that cover the universe of which gravity is the most basic one. so gravity for us is does think that help us stay grounded, so we don't so are somewhere in the universe. but do we have any idea of how gravity actually came? what it is, is, can there be a universe without gravity? will gravity didn't just come and go, it's not a force you can switch on and off or something like that. gravity has always been there. the question is, of course, to understand how to describe it. that was the kind of questions we finished ask. we don't ask an explanation as to why is it there and how did it come? our questions are are.