ah ah, other thanks for tuning in this is our t international russian foreign minister sagal of rob has just commented on the u. s. a nato response to moscow's demands for security guarantees. the document was given to the russian side. earlier on wednesday, let's have a listen in now to what lumber of had to say. luca, sir, it's a good junior to you'll do mass for the constant. there is a bunch i think and if you're a future it will be known to the general public because as our american counterparts at human bills, even the 3rd to keep this document confidential to keep the diplomatic going.

but it wasn't threatened by all dedicated some alliance and ukraine as well. so i have no gallon very soon as for the countries that document, it contains reaction that would allow us to whole mature, to start was curious conversation, but only for the 2nd primary topics. as for the main topic business document, you contains no positive reaction and the main matter for us, i'd like to remind you our position about an admissibility of this further nato is toward expansion and deployment. also, abandon, weapons that could threaten the territory of the russian ration stamps, didn't come out of the air. it's, as you know, all the matter is about non expansion or expansion of nato chevrolet. wait around for about to you is an old history is an old think, you know,

some good we were told in early ninety's since 1992 when turman you got unified when we were talking about the matter is your security. we were told that natal would not expand, not a single inch to the east of the odor river, and all these statements hold this bags. they are well known or stated in a lot of memoirs. all these shows from the u. k. from the united states, from germany. however, and now that when these topic has become my this my quite urgent non, that yellow, we were 1st told that raise statements, the splashes were just or and then later when we showed up to them the memoirs, our western counterparts started saying that it wasn't really serious, they didn't really manage. libra misunderstood so they didn't behave and, and growing up way, trying to explain their line about the expansion of their alliance.

and now, when we use in the edition, showing them not some oral promises, documents, and writings that were signed by the leaders of all the countries which joined with c, including the president of the united states. what i mean, those eastern bill of summit declaration of 999 and astronaut declaration of 2000 precluded susan 9 our western counterparts. we know how to extricate their way out of a more serious situation. what i mean, easier from both documents you've delayed eastern, both document and estimate declaration based. you believe that we've all committed to the principle of indivisibility of security, and we promise to abide by it. this principle is clearly stated very contains to interrelated approaches, a person, a fan of the right of each state to choose military alliances as recognized. and

the 2nd thing there is obligation for the each of the state not to insure one security at the expense of the security or potters. in other words, the right to choose alliances is conditioned by the need to take into consideration the crest of the safety and security of any other o c state, including obviously the russian ration it is indicative that now in the when you read some, i'll read proposal to you to come to terms about legally binding guarantees in your atlantic region. when our western counterparts are acted, these the always hurts to comply with the principles about that security on your other plan think. and then at the same time, they say it means that nato has the right make span. no one has the right to sum for be able to do with the nato members to consider the leads from any other countries is the principal. so you, according to which one cannot enhance security

a big and some security on the other. so it's not being discussed or talked about neither sandal declaration nor s. and that the correlation is not even mentioned in the discussions about the euro planned curative that we are talking about now they are trying to bypass it numerous, we cannot exist, they didn't know the situation. the state of things, if so, when they talked about 990 s, that it was saying that there were no obligations in writing about non expansion in nature. but now we do have a need based obligations in writing. so they were more reiterated confirmed by the always see a lot of times at the highest level as well. so now we will make the main am because this law and explaining these special visitation out of our western counterparts. when we've talked in geneva with anthony lincoln, i asked, but how can we explain various dance according to which they consider the

obligations adopted under it? they always see when he was only some kind of a menu from which they can only choose what they can hear the fast for them, the test, yes for them. and why do they use? and you put the adopted obligation of doing for the interest of others. they are trying to ignore, trying to lock it over and in the near future and actually on the blink. and didn't to answer anything. he just strikes you is shoulder is that see it. but i warn him as i were of some, our other is with other counterparts that in the near future we are going to send in that vicious query you with a demand to explain why the letters from the legalities that they assume by themselves why they only see, one item will be with it and the condition terms of the base very items they are trying chose to ignore black and ignoring. and it is going to be an official query to all the countries whose leaders sign that it's the goal. they collaboration and

absent of declaration which you put and hopefully in this particular diesel, it's one take a lot of time to explain why the west collective last. as for the rest, like i said, we are now retarding the response. we got from the american side and like, and tony blink and said was endorsed by radians and other western countries who as allies. and at the same time we have received the response also from the north atlantic treaty organization. from this secretary channel ulton burton. we consider that the student document together considering that they are reacting to the draft treaties and draft agreements that we believe in december. and yes, we have an offer in the lead that we will come up with a position in the report about it to the president and the president will make further decisions about further steps. okay,

we've just been listening to vs foreign minister said ralph, taking as through the written response receives from the united states and nato, that itself, a reply to russia's demand for a response to security requests. don't call to join me in the studio. the 2 words just took out really early on in that we're not positive done, but it just give us a bit more detail to, to what so your level of the yeah, exactly. we can go into the context we should really revisit a couple things that live, rob said there specifically what you just mentioned. i mean, the russian foreign minister said the response was not positive from the united states, to russia's key proposals for security guarantees. and of course, what he meant there was russia's demand that the u. s. not, and the u. s. and nato not put offensive weapons in europe in a position where it could possibly strike the hard land of the russian federation. and also a promise from nato, that it will not further expand eastward,

specifically into the countries of ukraine and georgia. that 2nd point, as love rav said, there is something that was promised back in 1990 to russia. actually back when the u. s. ceasar was still around back when a soviet president mikhail gorbachev was in power. they, they were promised as lover of said that the military alliance would not expand past the older river in europe. according to the russian foreign minister, when the, when western officials were set were, you know, presented with this, they began saying that it was just in an oral promise. and then when tensions began to intensify, they began backtracking rushes, showed them the documents that to prove this and as live, rob said, and he actually called what the west said in response. childlike and the here we are in the situation where, you know, they can't come to a compromise and nato isn't, is saying that it will not take rushes demand that they don't expand

a farther eastward. now, this all comes on the backdrop actually of what happened on wednesday when nato rejected publicly moscow's t. a proposals for security guarantees that i just mentioned there. that was shortly after we saw that the american ambassador to russia, john sullivan arrived in moscow actually to deliver these this answer to moscow's requests moscow's repose proposals for security guarantees. and that answer from the u. s. actually came 2 weeks after it was expected because russia had filed these proposals for security guarantees to the west back in december actually. and we also heard after they were delivered from the u. s. secretary of state and me blinking that the u. s. want the response to be kept a secret in the interest of diplomacy? he said, diplomacy to power afraid some diplomacy has the best chance when confident the confidentiality is respected. he also said that the u. s. is open to dialogue, but at the same time, he said that, you know, this is only if russia stops,

it's so called aggression against ukraine right now. and to understand what he's talking about there, we have to go back into what's been happening over the past several months, right? the western media nato, the united states, they've been going on and on about this alleged russian planned russian invasion of ukraine when moscow has time. and time again said that if not planning this, we've seen western media reports trying to just basically bring this point home that russia is planning to invade ukraine when moscow continues to reject these assertions. and at the same time, you know, what kind of potentially aggressive actions do we see. we see the u. s. continuing to arm ukraine, actually with anti anti tank missile systems. we've seen that from ukraine as well . we've seen washington declare that it's military advisors in ukraine. will stay there for the foreseeable future. we see nato strength and strengthen its positions,

its military positions on russia border. so, all the while us, the u. s. and nato, they're talking about trying to find a diplomatic solution to this entire problem. but it seems like the actions they're actually taking are telling a different story. yeah, and in essence, that written response means the status quo continues, meaning great tensions continue. appreciate the update that don't quote with me. in the meantime, there is discourse within nato's rank server, whether to deploy more troops or not bulgaria, insisted loyal nato ally, but says that he won't commit units to train and the duration president said his country would not get involved in any potential war in ukraine though, he was later contradicted by his prime minister. we asked karen, can i so form a foreign minister of austria where the nato will arrive at a unified position? i think this cracks have been around, at least since 2002, 2003 when we them saw the preparation for the the iraq war. and i would

say, what was the case? the iraq could turn even harsher in the case of ukraine. i think that need to show very alert about its real fitness to, to confront another crisis. it has been not the even 6 months ever since the district mand us defeat. in cub all, the whole nathan presents was dismantled within a few hours by some real various coming from the hindu push mountains. so the biggest military lines will defeated their in a very humiliating way than never was any serious maneuver critique why the for watson from no lessons learned? well, washington stresses the need for diplomacy, the only way out of the crisis. some journalists in america are stroking a more belligerent night, just buying time till they replaced to invade ukraine, making you jump through hoops like and delivering written responses to questions

that you, vance, at time and time again. in the past. meanwhile, that the stabilizing ukraine from within the economy's crumbling, you're spending hundreds of millions of dollars showing them up. what point do you stop playing rushes game and take preemptive action? now, we can walk and chew gum at the same time and that's very much what we've been doing . and while some journalists are in war mongering mode other seem to have lost the plots altogether. when it comes to train, who some west, the major van is pumping out absurd stories, petted with falsehoods. ski taylor explains. they say you should be coo and a crisis on last your the media, in which case, why when you can become hysterical and so panic instead. and never mind the kremlin battle, the european bickering old body didn't mix night cream just after warning about world war 3 off rule will never understand what goes on his head. the media pundits one real scoops the boulder the better, the more outlandish, the better. like this random women and kids, they found just hanging out

a window holding a gun. i have never hunted in my life. i bought this carbon after listening to some soldiers discussing the best rifle to get if it comes stood, then we'll fight for t. if we'll fight to protect our city, i don't see any sense in the rush and starting a war and leaving cave alone. it's strange because usually the major pro gun control, i guess it doesn't count of russia that the target will not how bad the crisis is. the media says that housewives have what that rags for rifles. the thing is, mariana jacqueline is in fact a simple ukrainian woman from the territorial defense forces. how uniform is british, another fake story about militants whom western propaganda turns into anti rush and freedom fighters. again, just like don fake news is great when it's direct against the russians. i guess there's only a certain number of undercover housewife and ukraine. so the media had to look elsewhere specifically at

a map. and it's noticed that the quickest way from moscow to kia is via chad noble making of the most logical invasion root. also, making russians pretty much the only willing visit is that since well, 1986, the risk of a war for the spreading radiation seems minimal, but one object in the zone is particularly vulnerable. a new $1700000000.00 stainless steel arch over the destroyed reactor. it was completed in 2016 to prevent the spread of highly radioactive gust. yes, on route to the landscape office. the press things that putin's troops might just topple a giant radiation containing structure that we've more than 29000 tons. you know, some like texas eyes and toxic exposure before the real fighting starts talking about the real fighting. have you read the mirror recently? no. oh wow, see you. i can see hooton's terrifying arsenal of high tech support. well, these include, i warn you, the pools

a typically far raising power tupa dogs. i agree, it really doesn't look like bad dog in the articles. photo signed up for regular sky diving, and that's because he didn't and thought photo is all they such an rescued dog. not one of the kremlin kin canines fabricated by the mirror. but if the ukrainians a don't surrender at the sight of a flailing dog and a harness while the robot tanks and flying clash, the cops are ready as back up the still firing ai ecological rifle with its own brain, is still of the prototype stage and a pit recently it's an arm show it can identify targets and pull the trigger with all the need for a human shooter. so potent dragging out the very latest innovations the special occasion. the thing is the ai kalashnikov rifle has actually been around since 2017 . the thing yet, the mera fide its entire back jackson department at themes. but never mind all this, because the most disappointing thing about this entire crisis is that puts his pad

block, the world will put a stop to travel, highly of old, extra terrestrials probably regard will ferris something, the only primitive civilizations engagement? so the ukraine situation means we're unlikely to get an invitation to join the federation for the time being, quite frankly, who can blame the media driving the aliens and told us, because once they finish driving, this wild population to a nervous breakdown, they'll need some new readers for all of the wild in panic and dispatch that they've got a cookie. and staying with ukraine, police have arrested a soldier suspected of carrying out a mass shooting in the city of de napa. 5 people died in the atrocity, the shooting occurred around 4 am local time. it took place in the offices of a company that makes military missiles. the police say that the suspects shot dead for other soldiers. and one civilian at this point is not clear what the motives

were, gum and fled the same with an assault rifle. no one was hurt during his arrest. argentina as, as the world health organization to speed up the approval process of russia. sputnik v vaccine, and he's sharing its data on the job with the w. h. a team of experts from the organizations to, to visit russia next month. what's more, a russian talent study released by the russian direct investment fund early this month found splitting v significantly more effective and tackling the only constraint than america's pfizer shop providing a tough response again, the latest among all samples, 74.2 percent of sputnik v vaccinated sarah were able to neutralize on the con versus 56.9 percent for face of vaccinated. so i looked at the paper and the data are promising. what the paper shows is. so sputnik b. yeah, antibodies that are used by this vaccine cross this army crowd isn't life and

activity with that will hopefully provide protection. i found especially promising was the very last graph of the paper. there you, it shows that kinetics off the antibody response, and as the new is, our neighbor seems that for some, quite rapidly. so after 6 months there are significantly lower levels of antibodies then you have shortly after next nation. my risk with these responses seems to be master state. i think we should also help countries to improve their own menu manufacturing capacity. do i think that our neighbors think companies are going to collaborate with j j? i'm not sure, but i was a hospital in the city of boston. i refuse to give a life saving heart transplant to

a patient. his family says it's because of his refusal to get vaccinated against cove. it's the man's wife says it's a violation of his rights. he is it extremely high risk of sudden death? we are literally in a corner right now. this is extremely time sensitive. we're being pressured to choose a shot that could kill him. this is not just a political issue, people need to have a choice. d. j. ferguson is a 31 year old father of 2 and reportedly suffering and stage heart failure. the. he says he wants to move him to another hospital because be transported because of his condition. the hospital is defended. it stands saying that the co vaccine is one of many requirements. the old transplant recipients health care system requires several cdc recommended vaccines, including the cobra. 19 vaccine and lifestyle behaviors for transplant candidates to create both the best chance for a successful operation and to optimize the patient's survival after transplantation given that their immune system is drastically suppressed. we spoke to john don

brown, sky sea of the washington pain center. he says, refusing to get the job isn't grounds enough for a transplant ban in ethics. one, we have to, we know, respect the patient, what they want. now truly, if the patient is really bad, heart disease but has bad behaviors and things like that in terms of smoking and diet and exercise, he doesn't do well then clearly, you know, those organs are very limited. so we're not going to give it to that one individual play changes your lifestyle behavior, but clearly this is not the case. he sounds compliant with respect to his you know, other issues are early to his heart disease. the one thing seems to be the sticking point seems as code vaccination we've done with many patients who are ne, transplant with a kidney transplant, long transplants before coded, and there's never been requirement for vaccination ever. well, these are very ethical questions and if the patient does not want to move in that direction, but truly needs care and then the physician and the patient should talk to one another and move forward. so we should want to get some more information,

but hopefully we can move forward, take care of these patients. because time is of the essence. let's do a transplant and maybe talk about the vaccine later because he may not make it to tomorrow. british prime minister is political life hangs in the balance with an inquiry into so called polity gate locked down, violations about to be released as rampant speculation, therefore, could spoke a vote of no confidence. embarrassed johnson if i stay relative and pace and a common show down already with goals for is immediate resignation. i would prefer to be led by law than ally. i will. he now reside every moment he stays, his dragging the agony for families who reminded of the sacrifices they made a drug in his party, father through the dirt. the public knows that the house knows it even his own and please know it or when will the prime minister talk horn and go? well, it was indeed a very heated prime ministers. questions is the primary subarus johnson clings on

refusing to resign. it comes as we still are awaiting the very much long awaited su, gray investigation report. it's still yet to be published as the weight gets longer and longer though many people have taken to social media saying the anticipation is more exciting than waiting for christmas. meanwhile, the leader of the opposition is calling on bars johnson to go saying that the prime minister alive twice misleading parliament about these parties. on the 1st of december, the promise to told this house in relation to paul christian locked out. all guidance was followed completely in number 10. on the 8th of december, the prime minister told this house, i have been repeatedly assured since these allegations of merge the walls no party since acknowledges the minister of quote replies to him, william verizon. oh, people, at least 16 alleged gatherings in downing street parties have emerged and come to

light the report is expected to make conclusions on at least some of them. now what we do know is that includes the 20th of may 2020, where by allegedly a 100 people were invited to the downing street party to make the most out of the wonderful lovely weather and also bring your own booze. in april of 2021, apparently 2 parties were held on the very same night where one attendee was even sent to the nearby shops at top up on the staff to return with it in a suit case. now, quite crucially, that party i was on the night before prince phillips funeral, and since then, downing street has apologized directly to the queen. now more recently, an allegation comes with burst johnson on his birthday party on june the 19th, apparently there were 30 people endorse where the prime minister was presented with some cake and staff saying, happy birthday. now many people say the prime minister has indeed been caught red

handed with all of this, but forest johnson has repeatedly said that he didn't know he was breaking any of the rules while some of forest johnson support to says some of these parties. and indeed, the birthday party was not premeditated. people came and presented him the cake on his birth, through the sewing happy both. he was there for about 10 minutes. it was not a pre meditated organized party. in that sense, he was in a sense, ambush will take interestingly though, when it comes to the su gray, fine things, they will be sent directly to the prime minister. and then it will be up to him to make a statement to the house of commons. so some people are saying will we see the full findings will that be made public or will the prime minister choose to redact some of that information? a 20 year old student from the united kingdom has avoided prison time despite being convicted of raping a 12 year old girl. after his arrest last year, yakking joshua moscow confessed to 3 counts of rape and spent 7 months in custody.

he was later released on bail and sentence to 200 hours of unpaid work, explaining the light sentence. the judge said she believed the man was not aware of the victim's real age. there is no suggestion of any p defile tendencies at all. what instead, there is a young man who is relatively immature and possibly naive. the judge also confirmed that despite being preteen, the victim was on a dating up and behaved in a sexually suggestive way. ah, the me with the

we discussed this controversial case with a panel of guests. i am the amused by the story. am i and i'm actually deeply offended by it that there's a 20 by 20 year old man. cannot recognize somebody who is significantly, actually in a not an adult, not even an adult, not, not a 15 year old, but somebody is 12. so that's just pretty sick making to me. it should be the case if everyone conform to the recommended approach on all of the social media platforms that will be nobody present under the age of 13 and good to actually, you know, be honest about their age and vote for certain graduations above. but i don't think it's a particularly alarming present though. i do think it does raise questions about the the degree of protection that very young children have in the law. and that, that, that there isn't as much distinction between children. the 30 and i was 13 as one

mike single though there are defences that can be run in the case voted children platform that they were on is not one than i would personally just wanted to visit for a moment that both of them chose to be on that there is a responsibility and especially on in more he's an adult. he should have known or even had an inkling though he was having a relationship with a child under age it'll, it's against the law and whatever, whatever. or the fact that she was on tinder doesn't give him a reason or an excuse to have a sexual relationship with her. if you embark on a level of abuse, you can be held george out because your identity is known. also, if your gender or your us are the blackboard, because you know, the other people present on that level had had their age checked,

it will prevent you unwittingly, being connected to somebody who was under a. i mean, we don't let our children drive or drink or smoke until they are over an age to be able to take them risks responsibly. and we shouldn't be doing that with social media. whether it has been shown a great deal of hall. i'm going to had and i wraps up by our news bulletin for this hour. if you hungry for more checkout, plenty eggs to stories. we have stood on our website just head to our team. now in all you do, earth is he is a sphere in your fast you're far enough and and and the other side when he came home and you're back home. so i would like to envision that you does it also the address of the living is just like that. no on the action.