she asked him, myakea desk with human with martha. the moment that i can, let's thump ah, tonight after month to the west insisting that russia reset to invade ukraine, nato secretary general makes a stunning. you turn admitting the military block actually has no confidence whatsoever. but any such aggression will happen at all used to be a police. if it depends on the russian federation, then there will be no war. we don't want any wars, but we will also not allow our interest to be rudely trampled on and ignored. i made a growing stand off for the west, open ukraine. russia's top diplomat stresses moscow does not want conflict, but insisted security must been short of this health stuff. so the u. k.

government is tens of thousands phase to sack. if i don't get the coven job next week to get the latest from one of the doctors behind the lawsuit, with hello there will control international. will these at 9 with me, kevin o. in 1st and as mentioned, nato sexual generals admitted that the military block actually has no confidence that moscow will invade ukraine. that statement, coming, despite months of the west, pushing violet anti russian rhetoric, claiming that aggression by the kremlin was eminent consulting burg making the starting. you turn then at the atlantic council event earlier. am that time? as long as she does not, once again decide to use military force, you don't do that as well. there's no certainty about the russian plans. maybe they have not made any final decision. well,

it means anything more and more of a public message shifting regarding what was previously referred to as a russian invasion of ukraine being immediate, just after yen stalsen berg. we've had floating me as a lindsey the ukrainian president speaking saying that he also doesn't particularly see an immediate risk of a russian invasion. and if you take the comments from valencia from stolen berg and put them alongside briefings that have been given to the media off the record in brussels from nate. so h q that has suggested that there's really a want to get a de escalation from the u. s side that there wasn't really a unanimity amongst nato members that the, the russian troops in the west of russia represented a potential invasion for us all really. but that the united states is desperate for a de escalation over this issue. because they really want to switch focus over towards china. this is quite a significant switch of pack though,

because if you look at the way this message was put across in the last 2 months, well, was put across very differently. us intelligence officials say russia could invade ukraine as soon as january, and that's because of russian troops that are mass on ukraine's borders. we are now to stage where russia could, at any point, watch an attack and ukraine. russia is the aggressor here. we will not accept the campaign, russia is waging since about its democratic neighbors. again, stilton bug also spoken awful lot about the beefing up of nato forces in the east of the ally inside the committing troops towards deployment in the store. troops being ready to deploy to the east now also on friday was confirmed by the slovakian foreign minister that his country is in discussion with nato for the stationing of troops in slovakia. lucky it does border ukraine, but what was confirmed by insulting burg on friday also is that there is no plans to set nato troops into ukraine. it's correct and we are not planning to deploy,

nate to combat troops to ukraine. and i don't install and berg was also at pains to say that nato is very open to having more talks with russia, particularly when it came to alms control. but the idea of having more talk came at the same time as reports are coming out. there are plans for huge sanctions being planned by nato countries, driven by the united states and the united kingdom. the sanctions would target russia's energy and banking sectors. they would kick in of course, if there was any invasion by russia of ukraine. sco live to brought back a national coordinator for the hon, answer collision. hey there brian. welcome is a chief complete change of stamps by the looks of it, an exception tonight, or could it mark the start of a less? so we say war like, mindset from the alliance? well, let's start from the beginning. this is

a manufactured crisis. was created by the u. s. government by nato forces, by the us media. you might call it heard think, but it's more like a frenzied hygiene as i mean, if you listen to the media, you played a little bit of the clips there, but the media is non stop is 24 hour a day here in washington, dc. and around the united states, britain and americans would think that russia is on the moon. russia is on the march. it's just a matter of days, maybe hours before russia invades. and the question is, why did the u. s. manufacture this crisis? well, i think we have to go back to vladimir putin as end of the year. press conference where he said russia indeed does have red lines. ukraine cannot become part of nato and the united states and nato countries, whether ukraine is in nato or not, cannot use ukraine is a staging ground for advanced weapons and missiles,

who would have a flight time to their targets in russia of just a couple minutes that this is a red line, this is not acceptable. and so clearly that because this is a whole sticking point, isn't it? as far as ukraine's concerned people who are the side of it, say, well, ukraine's a sovereign nation that you'd be able to do exactly what it wants to do and what, where it is. you know, we've, even if it's next door to russia, what is the argument, what is the strong argument that russia has say that ukraine shouldn't do that? well, let's just assume that the canadian government decided to have russia place advanced weapons at the u. s. canadian border, or let's say the mexican government did the same, or let's say cuba as happened in 1962. when the soviet union placed missiles in cuba and the united states took the world to the verge of thermo nuclear war, this would be unacceptable to the united states. so, the united states says on one hand, only nato can determine who will members who will be and only ukraine will determine who its allies will be. but the, the fact of the matter is the united states would never tolerate

a major thermo nuclear power staging weapons on the u. s. canadian or us mexican border. they deny, though, to russia the same thing that they arrogant to themselves. and that's really the crux of the man on top of the insult vill scott, the president subs lensky. say we don't have a titanic here tonight. he's saying there's no more escalation than before. and there's no blaming the media for pumping up the rhetoric, particularly saying that it's not hurting the financial markets there in ukraine. is he changing touch? well, they're all changing cag because the, the fact of the matter is they work themselves into a frenzy. and now as a consequence, they're losing allies in europe. i mean, the big problem really, for the united states is it wants to maintain, had gemini over europe over the nato countries. that's the reason nato, i believe, still exists. 30 years after the end of the worst pack countries, but germany would independently gravitate in the direction of russia. that's of course, where it gets its natural gas. it's much more effective and efficient and cheaper

for germans and we're north europeans. so the u. s. is manufacturing these crisis to keep us immense tension, so as to maintain that plan of the alliance. it controls 30 seconds the 1st. so we go. what's going to give here though? we've got each side saying, well that's the red line, that's the red line. what is going to happen? do you think? well, i think the united states needs to step back. it does need to negotiate with russia . a wars can happen even if neither side wants them. because when it's at this level of tension, when both sides of climate escalation later, the u. s. climbing at 1st of war, start, this is how wars historically happen misses the time to talk rebecca, them to coalition, thanks been live on the program. thank you. now elsewhere, more calles interrupted in the one sports tight relationship between the u. s. ministry media and give itself to sin and deleted, then returned an article revealing ukraine's president told joe biden that america was over play. the imminent russian invasion cod were on it than from suskin taylor

lives in a few days. ukraine crisis has thrown out a whole array of contradicting statements from native majesty disagreeing on whether to keep troops near russia to you states disagreeing on whether to send weapons to key at the latest mixed message. and quite a mysterious one comes from 2 t players. that's washington and keith. now on thursday, the u. s. on ukrainian president had a phone conversation and the media reported the fight and was warning the when the brink of world war 3, hooton's waiting for the ground to freeze over in february. and that he'll give the signal for an invasion. it's a, let's keep the, his part was trying to pot you to calm his u. s. counterpart down by stating that it's all still ambiguous. it seemed and that the 2 leaders would very much at all a call between u. s. president joe biden and ukrainian president followed him or zalinski on thursday, did not go well. the senior ukrainian official told cnn i met disagreements over the risk levels of a russian attack. zelinski urged his american counterpart to calm down the

messaging warning of economic impact of panic. according to the official, he also said ukrainian intelligence seized the threat differently. so quickly such later, that on top of all the other disagreements within the you and nato. now, even washington and key f, who off quite literally brothers in arms on to, on the same page. but then something, but hewlett happened less than an hour and a half off to the scene. an article broke. it just disappeared. there was no trace any more, a bite and whipping up hysteria about him in a wool and zelinski, telling him to calm down on in its pace. what a pit? well, a snoo of tweets from cnn people on from her field about how the white house disputes, how the coal wasn't a success. in fact, it was all just one big lie. white house on biden's, lensky call. anonymous sources are leaking. falsehood. president biden said that there is a distinct possibility that the russians could invade ukraine in february,

reports of anything more different than that, are completely false on hot on these heels. he also came out claiming that the original article was riddled with mistakes. dear colleagues, some reports regarding the content of the talks between presidents villa dimmer zalinski and joe biden have appeared on social media. citing the alleged senior ukrainian official. these messages are completely false. so to put it simply, we had an article sites in a scene, yet ukrainian official. now the articles disappeared in a whole army, both in the ukraine and state side out, doing damage control. what happened behind the scenes? it's still a mystery font, understandably, there are lots of questions and what suspicions, why such a shot? 180, who gave the order for the story to be taken down. and so probably not a surprise. biden's critics are calling the transparency. what they want is a transcript of the phone call. will someone ask press secretary if the whitehouse will release the transcript? when will you release the transcript?

what exactly was said in the hour and 20 minute chat between bite and until as he is still unclear. what did going now mc between them to lead to says it's still unclear. is it indeed true? lensky was the one telling bite to tone down the hysteria that are a lot of questions, though. also seems to be the sense that best is, was poor and verify john and isn't. and it was, it would be really cynical. that was something in that article that someone really didn't want to come out. so i could tell they will just hours before the nato chief spoke, rushes of foreign ministers, spelled out clearly, that the country does not want was such a love reiterated moscow's position on escalating tensions with the west. but he also noted moscow can just stand by watching its interest being ignored. leverage shared his thoughts during a 90 minute interview to russian journalists. among them was our editor in chief, margarita simonian, is what mister love had to say. yes, this is alicia authorities configured. i see lately,

if it depends on the russian federation, then there will be no war. we don't want any wars, but we're also not allow our interest to be brutally trampled on and ignored. the foreign minister was asked many questions about the tensions about what russia is going to do about them and where ultimately this is all going to lead. when there's going to be a boy, he himself was a much more diplomatic with regards to the america documents, the counter proposals to russian security proposals that arrived in moscow just 2 days ago that the united states finally sent in writing, which is something that, marcia now demands given how in the past that fields are cheated by verbal guarantees that it was given. so now it insists on a, on documents, on paper in rights and guarantees. and what marcia sort of guarantees that ultimately, if the gist of it is the nater missiles and troops on stationed in the near future

on russia's borders, or any closer to russia's borders than they are now. and that is something that, according to many officials, that wasn't included in these documents, he himself, for 4 minutes the labyrinth was much more diplomatic. he said that the, they're analyzing them. and that they've received the documents from both the united states and nato at he was much less diplomatic about what he had received from nato, however, or to you will not in the fornia. in contrast to what we've received from nato, the american response is almost like a model of diplomatic decency. the response from nato is so ideological, it breeze so much with the exclusivity of the north atlantic lines that i was a little ashamed of those who wrote these texts. previously, we had heard from other officials that the documents, the counter proposal sent by the united states. i didn't address a single one of russia's concerns that they made no promises that they thought expand further east or does it ultimately that those and no guarantees that those

missiles, they to missiles american missiles, of wouldn't be stationed ever closer to russia. nevertheless, he says there is some optimism varies the negotiation, there are talks that are ongoing and perhaps a solution might be reached a solution which satisfies both the united states and russia. nevertheless, we must have county says for relations relations which for years i have var deteriorated, which i now at a level that has catastrophic which, which, which says a lab, rob says a much, you know, the food for which is much and it, i did said sport what with various demands that they have made over the years with regards to russia, you slew on you. if they insist that they will not change their position, we will not change our position either. it's just that their position is based on false arguments on a direct turning over the facts and opposition is based on what everyone signed up

under. and here i don't see any room for compromise. otherwise, what is they to agree on? if they frankly sabotage and misrepresent the old decisions, this will be a key test for us at russia with regards to what is happening in ukraine of the russian foreign minister also said that the united states and nato are pushing ukraine towards an escalation, they're pushing them with a vast amount of arms, we've heard the united states posting about $283.00 tons of the lethal farms and other equipment that they have delivered to ukraine in the last few months. and this is, this came, was as a boast, the russian say that ultimately the united states is using, using ukraine in order to achieve its own goals, which are to contain rush and ultimately focus on china for answer your minute of france, germany and the european union called russia conflicts, country,

what can be negotiated then when they say you must comply with the minsk agreements? we asked them what exactly of these points should russia fulfill? nobody answers the key of realised that berlin in paris would not force it to comply with the minsk agreements. so they understand that now they can do everything, both zalinski and his regime a used 1st of all by the americans in order to escalate tensions. their main goal is not the feature of ukraine, but to heighten tensions around russia and then move on to china. ultimately the russians say that the irony side, the only power on earth that can force the ukrainian government to follow through with a minsk agreements, a comprehensive peace plan to end the civil war. and you credit that the only power that can force you credit to abide by them is the united states. and it isn't interested in seeing them minsk agreements fulfilled because that would lead to a d escalation. that there wouldn't be a need to keep pumping weapons into your credit, and there wouldn't be a need to escalate tensions with russia. and this is something the ukrainians are

beginning to understand. foreign minister lab rob says that they are being used, as sometimes said, sometimes regardless of despite what they want and the ukraine has blamed the united states and the media for escalating the situation. there have been ukrainian officials that have said there is no evidence that the russians are preparing for an invasion. and that the only other sides of all with sea have been on television and from the mouths of various politicians. there is also an elaborate said, the fear that the, the situation could be it could go out spiral out of control because of elements that, that key of that ukraine doesn't control. and that is various extremist and volunteer battalions. 5 his on to the teeth station near the conflict lines. who could, on the orders of some one out, carry out a provocation to de escalate things even further. ah,

now shall save stuff fighting, mandatory covert shots in the u. k. courts. his lesson a week to go now before doctors, fates being fired, if it on started around $80000.00 work is still on to knock elated ahead of the deadline to get the 1st job with lawyers warning the government that it hits fundamental freedoms. if people have to give away the bodily autonomy, there is a question over whether they remain free. it is causing an unacceptable level of stress and uncertainty for them and for the health service and the public. and a chess cove it guidance is that employees must have had their 1st vaccine dose by the 3rd of february and vaccination. start face the suck if they can't be redeployed to a position that does not require interaction with patients. what a spokesperson for the government's department of health and social care stands by the ruling. despite pandemic, restrictions being scrapped and almost all of the walks of life in the u. k. from now and a chest metix was the vaccine mandate is the last straw and a pandemic marked by chronic under funding with son,

the staffing of the service. and the health chiefs noting that the firings will further hurt and already depleted workforce mess took off with my legs with a season orthopedic consultant, surgeon, who's finally together decoration, opposing mandatory vaccination. hi, welcome to the program to see wow, would you start here? us at mass. consider what you guys have been through on the front line of all this for 2 years now and on. it goes, how much stress is this monday to putting on health stuff already struggling to cope? o, a tremendous immersed stress. i'm just getting inundated messages from health care workers from the whole spectrum of doctors, nurses, audiologist, spearing for their livelihoods and their careers because they're being made to you know, forced to have a job or choose, you know, being sacked as frankly ridiculous. but the medics about health organization telling us that it is the way to go. the job is the safe way to go. it's been tested as well as it could be. mass tested if you'd like, or be in a

a short period of time. you'll the medics with a public looking. you going hang on a minute. if we're being told it's ok to take well you. yeah, well, this is a great question and you know the answer this for you, i'm going to quote the prime minister. so on sky news and the 22nd of october, you said it doesn't protect you from catching the disease and it doesn't protect you against passing on. forget that, listen to chris, would te, 14th of december, there's minimal impact on transmission with regard to all of our vaccines. and the secretary of health has gone on on the 19th of january, saying what we've learned in the last few weeks to vaccines are not enough against on the chrome. they're nowhere near enough to just don't work in terms of protecting, certainly against hospitalization. and the latest you key data is showing actually infection rates are 2 and a half times higher and the vaccinate group. oh, but either which way you know what i, you look at it with

a very so says what it says about it and you kind of got to go by what they say. suppose i'm deaths are falling. you know, people are catching the virus but deaths, the falling justifies a milder variant of the original strain. the vaccines were made that original strain. remember that this is, this is almost like a blessing from nature. this is what happens. a virus mutation becomes less me. so, and you know that concept, all mandatory vaccination is really knocking down the cornerstone of medical antics that we've enjoyed for centuries, orderly tanami, freedom of choice, and forcing this boxing. but what about the vaccines for people to take it in the passion of smallpox? measles, rubella, etc, goes on. people that make such fuss then. now the thing is, vaccines are typically taken to protect an individual vaccines that you just mention of gossip tastic, track, record safety record, their traditional vaccines. once you take a vaccine, you get lifelong immunity, would you not agree with that? if you look at these vaccines,

they're definitely not traditional vaccines. there's no long term data now. actually evans is coming up. we were dying from this vaccine, thousands series side effects. and so forcing this on, individuals who may even be naturally immune have high co, it doesn't make sense, but you're a medic. what should have been done then? what, what should we do as protector? vulnerable in the society and the doctors and nurses have been protecting their patients for decades. let them carry on with their job. you want to support that and it chest good? of people worried? you know you've got, you've got to often people that have got other problems on top of coven, so the immune systems are depleted anyway. they're worried to come into hospital to think that people treating them might give them, coven, make them worse. ok, so what's really interesting is, if you've not, you could have core where you could be infected, symptomatic and vaccinated, and spreading the disease at work. but you can immune and unvaccinated and not cove

it, and you'll be sex. if anything, i would argue the latter group is going to be the safer person to work around than the unvaccinated you to get infected in this transmitting it to you when your group don't all smell, we got 10 seconds left. just left. is this letter gonna make any difference in the 310 seconds? do you think i feel the wind is behind or sales, and i think we're going to turn this around. i think the public can see for the nonsense or i don't proper malik. orthopedic consulting surgeon, thank ever so much appreciated. leisure with more than 80 lawmakers calling on joe biden to write off student loan debt, says pro mr. in the presidential election campaign. it seems that biden's in no hurry, though to carry out his promise. despite students who believed his pledge waiting for months under the additional strain of the pandemic, we urge you to direct the department of education to publicly release the memo outlining your legal authority to broadly cancel student loan debt and immediately

cancel up to $50000.00 of student loan debt for borrower. it comes, says she, a student debt toll hits an astonishing amount. now we're talking $1.00 trillion dollars and the burden is still growing an alarming rate. at 6 times faster, the national economy is estimated more than 43000000 people still have unpaid federal student loan debt. why it's a spokesperson saying that by this continuing to look into the issue. last year, the president asked the u. s. education and justice department to prepare memos on his legal authority to cancel student that one person who still hasn't paid off his student loans, told us the government says its priorities wrong. it's a matter of priority is the matter of where this government puts its priorities and who they put 1st to they put for students and young people and you know, even people who are well in their forties and fifties that are still paying their student loans back do they put the middle and working classes, the popular sectors of the population 1st or do they put the huge financial institution or the military industrial complex?

first, obviously they have no problem spending money. they have no problem printing trillions of dollars to prop up big banks. they have no problem doing bank bailouts. they have no problem allowing, you know, speculation on international markets. they have no problem putting these people 1st . essentially, the, all the guard if you will, of the united states in the world. but when it comes to helping the people, we're lucky if we get a $2000.00 check, which is a drop in the bucket for the united states budget would be the right decision to cancel student loans because so many people are hurting. there's a 1000000 in one different things that the government could be doing to help the people of this country. at the same time, we see record breaking inflation. we see also record breaking profits by corporations. 2 out of 3 corporations today are doing better economically than they were before the pandemic. and that's at the same time that people are not nowhere

near a better off than they were before the pandemic. and that's staying a lot because they weren't doing very well before the pandemic to begin with. some to chew over friday, the western liberal democracies now live under a full sense of freedom with us practically, and civil war. that's the leading of philosophy as level. he's saying that he's wanted this new book, heaven and disorder. we got the low down a bit more on why i think what day really is. isaacs are western liberal democracy themselves. i'm not blaming one site or the opposite of here, the debbie level off in cuba society, the outrage state policy. but the bishop district, you know, very strange, great demo to be done. slate into political engagement

in the wes kazlowski is much more in the lead then in the sense off we are james. while we are not even aware of how we gotta change our end, because we experience ourselves, we do what you want, but to be racially digital media. it's not what you want to doing. what you are doing. read, you start somewhere from that new pharmacy big. you can manipulate your desire, your says, you disagree by out. she promote that some will. yes. for talking about ecology and so on. but it's like watchable that she will lose their elections. and then me,

united states cannot react. so this is the beek, not bad now. because the state of war, the country in fact, that you cannot even reason that but dialogue. and this is very several years ago, the new book, that se, will these at 9 is me kevin now, and thanks for watching over a good evening to ah, ah ah ah

ah ah exaggerated rhetoric, massive arm shipments and endless threats. this is how nato presents asian a pan european security. meanwhile, moscow wage to the u. s. and his eyes to respond to his demands and vision for the say. the status quo is hunter. with without federal enforcement of the new civil rights legislation, the states enacted the black co.