the money, not that i can, my less thought a month to the west insisting that russia is set to invade ukraine to die. nato secretary general makes a stunning you to admitting the military block actually has no confidence whatsoever that any such aggression move out middle used to be released. if it depends on the russian federation, then there will be no wall. we don't want any wars, but we will also not allow our interest to be rudely trampled on and ignored. automated, growing, stand off with the west of ukraine rushes help diplomat stresses moscow does not want conflict, but insist sits, security must be insured. whether you snide health stuff, so the u. k. government is tens of thousands faced the sac if they don't get the

coven job by next week, we get the latest for one of the doctors behind the loss with a good evening. thanks. checking in. welcome to outs. internationals world news 11 with me, kevin o' and 1st tonight, next a sex generals admitted that the military block actually has no confidence that moscow will invade ukraine. that statement coming despite months of the west, pushing violent anti russian rhetoric, claiming that the aggression by the kremlin was imminent in stone berg making the startling you turn at the atlantic council event earlier. am that time? as long as she does not, once again decide to use military force, you don't do that as well. there's no certainty about the russian plans. maybe they have not made any final decision. well, it means anything more and more of a public message shifting regarding what was previously referred to as

a russian invasion of ukraine being immediate, just after yen stalsen berg. we've had floating me as a lindsey the ukrainian president speaking saying that he also doesn't particularly see an immediate risk of a russian invasion. and if you take the comments from lindsay from stolen berg and put them alongside briefings that have been given to the media off the record in brussels from nate. so h q that has suggested that there's really a want to get a de escalation from the u. s side that there wasn't really a unanimity amongst nato members that the, the russian troops in the west of russia represented a potential invasion for us all really. but that the united states is desperate for a de escalation over this issue. because they really want to switch focus over towards china. this is quite a significant switch of pack though, because if you look at the way this message was put across in the last 2 months,

well, was put across very differently. us intelligence officials say russia could invade ukraine as soon as january, and that's because of russian troops that are mass on ukraine's borders are now to stage where russia could at any point, watch an attack and ukraine. russia is the aggressor here. we will not accept the campaign, russia is waging since about its democratic neighbors. you insult and bug also spoken awful lot about the beefing up of nato forces in the east of the ally inside that. committing troops towards deployment and the store troops being ready to deploy to the east. now also on friday was confirmed by the slovakian foreign minister that his country is in discussion with nato for the stationing of troops in slovakia. lucky it does border ukraine. but what was confirmed by insulting berg on friday also is that there is no plans to set nato troops into ukraine. it's correct and we are not planning to deploy nate to combat troops to ukraine. and i

don't install and berg was also at pains to say that nato is very open to having more talks with russia, particularly when it came to alms control. but the idea of having more talk came at the same time as reports are coming out. there are plans for huge sanctions being planned by nato countries, driven by the united states and the united kingdom. the sanctions would target russia's energy and banking sectors. they would kick in. of course, if there was any invasion by russia of ukraine, i spoke to martin dozer, germany. the last part he says, the nato chiefs remarks may reflect a growing realization that a war and rushes border. can't be one called the 1st step. it's a good step below to stop this propaganda which has been proceeded for last. let's see, 2 or 3 months. no, maybe the need to stay. maybe the us government agencies

and inside that so it's not useful to escalate. this is conflict because the panel room and if you object to flee, it was clear that russia cannot have any interest to craig cause you claim this exactly on the russian border and it was exactly what serves florida to escalate. that situation will be stupid. so maybe no idea government has changed, the name has changed that they see that entire locker is a better way to proceed. aside from the more care, this is a route to the ones water tight relationship between the us, mainstream media and k f. we can report that off to say, and i deleted then returned an article revealing ukraine's president joe biden, that told that america was over. sorry, let's get this again. that the ukranian president told joe biden that america was, get it right over playing the imminent russian invasion card. south containers got

the latest on it. hello, the last few days ukraine crisis had thrown out a whole array of contradicting statements from nature mendecy disagreeing. and whether to keep troops russia to use, they disagreeing on whether to send weapons to keep the latest mixed message and quite a mysterious one that comes from 2 key players to washington. and here now also update us on ukranian. president had a phone conversation, and the media reported the fight and was warning the wilma brink of wild war 3 pitches waiting for the ground to free in february. and then he'll give the signal for an invasion. let us keep his part was trying to calm his us counterpart down by stating that it's all still big us. it seemed then that the 2 leaders was very much at all a call between us president joe biden and ukrainian president volume, or is it wednesday on thursday? did not go well. a senior ukrainian official told cnn amid disagreements over the risk levels of

a russian attack. so lensky urge his american counterpart to calm down the messaging warning of the economic impact of panic. according to the official, he also said ukrainian intelligence sees the threat differently. so it quickly thought later that on top of all the other disagreements within the e, u. a nato. now even washington and kia, who are quite literally brothers in arms on to, on the same page. but then something that happened less than an hour and a half off to the cnn article broke. it just disappeared. there was no trace any more bite and whipping up his theory about him in a wall and the landscape telling him to come down on its pace. what a pit? well, a few of tweets from cnn people on the field about how the white house dispute, how the call wasn't a success. in fact, it was all just one big lie. whitehouse on biden's lensky call. anonymous sources are leaking falsehoods. president biden said that there is a distinct possibility that the russians could invade ukraine in larry reports of

anything more different than that are completely false on hot on these heels. he also came out claiming that the written article was riddled with mistakes. dear colleagues, some reports regarding the content of the talks between presidents villa, dimmer zalinski and joe biden have appeared on social media. citing the alleged senior ukrainian official. these messages are completely false. so to put it simply, we had an article, citing a senior ukrainian official. now the articles disappeared in a whole army, both in the ukraine and state side out, doing damage control. what happened behind the scenes? it's still a mystery font, understandably, there are lots of questions and what suspicions? why such a shot? one a t who gave the order for the story to be taken down. and so probably not a surprise. biden's critics are calling the transparency. what they want is a transcript of the phone call. will someone ask, press secretary if the white house will release the transcript?

when will you release the transcript? what exactly was said in the hour and 20 minute chat between bites and ansolaski is still unclear. what did dynamic between them to lead to says it's still unclear. is it indeed true that zelinski was the one telling by to tone down the hysteria? there are a lot of questions that we'll say seems to be the sense that at best this was poor on verify john anderson. and it was if we're being re cynical, that was something in that article that someone really didn't want to come out. and just hours before the nato chief spoke, rushes 4 minutes to spelled out clearly, the country does not want war. sigel of rav reiterating moscow's position on escalating tensions for the west. however, he also noted, too, that moscow couldn't just stand by watching his interest being ignored. that rashid his thoughts during a 90 minute interview to russian journalists among them was our editor in chief margarita simonian. his will ever had to say, yes, this is alicia authorities. if you do not see lately,

if it depends on the russian federation than there will be no wall, we don't want any wars, but we're also not allow our interest to be brutally trampled on and ignored. the foreign minister was asked many questions about the tensions about what russia is going to do about them and where ultimately this is all going to lead. whether there's going to be a boy, he himself was a much more diplomatic with regards to the american documents, the counter proposals to russian security proposals that arrived in moscow just 2 days ago that the united states finally sent in writing, which is something that, that much of now demands, given how in the past that fields are cheated by verbal guarantees that it was given. so now it insists on our, on documents on paper, in writing guarantees. and what marcia sort of guarantees that ultimately the gist of it is the nater missiles and troops on stationed in the near future on russia's

borders or any closer to russia's borders than they are now. and that is something that, according to many officials, that wasn't included in these documents, he himself, for 4 minutes, the lab rob was much more diplomatic. he said that the, the analyzing them are that they've received the documents from both the united states and nato at he was much less diplomatic about what he had received from nato . however, are too well known fornia. in contrast to what we've received from nato, the american response is almost like a model of diplomatic decency. the response from nato is so ideological, it breeze so much with the exclusivity of the north atlantic alliance that i was a little ashamed of those who wrote these taxes. previously, we had heard from other officials that the documents to count a proposal sent by the united states. i didn't address a single one of russia's concerns that they made no promises that they threw expand further east or does it ultimately that those no guarantees that those missiles,

they to miss out american missiles, of wouldn't be stationed ever closer to russia. nevertheless, he says there is some optimism varies the negotiation, there are talks that are ongoing and perhaps a solution might be reached a solution which satisfies both the united states and russia. nevertheless, we must have county says for relations relations which for years have var deteriorated, which are now at a level that is catastrophic which lead which says a lab, rob says a much, you know the fault for which is much in it. i did, said scored what with various demands that they have made over the years with regards to russia, you slew on you. if they insist that they will not change their positions, we will not change our position either. is just the, their position is based on false arguments on a direct turning over the facts and opposition is based on what everyone signed up

under. and here i don't see any room for compromise. otherwise, what is there to agree on, if they, frankly sabotage and misrepresent the old decisions? this will be a key test for us at russia with regards to what is happening in ukraine of the russian foreign minister. also said that the united states and nato are pushing ukraine towards an escalation, they're pushing them with a vast amount of arms. we've heard the united states posting about 283 tons of the lethal farms and other equipment that they have delivered to ukraine in the last few months. and this is, this came, was as a boast, the russian say that ultimately the united states is using, using ukraine in order to achieve its own goals, which are to contain russia and ultimately focus on china for answer your minute of france, germany and the european union called russia conflicts, country,

what can be negotiated then when they say you must comply with the minsk agreements? we asked them what exactly of these points should russia fulfill? nobody answers from kentucky have realised that berlin in paris would not force it to comply with the minsk agreements. so they understand that now they can do everything by the zalinski and his regime a used 1st of all by the americans in order to escalate tensions. and main goal is not the feature of ukraine, but a heightened tensions around russia and then move on to china. ultimately the russians say that the irony side, the only power on earth that can force the ukrainian government to follow through with a minsk agreements, a comprehensive peace plan to end the civil war. and you credit that the only power that can force you credit to abide by them is the united states. and it isn't interested in seeing them minsk agreement fulfilled because that would lead to a d escalation. that there wouldn't be a need to keep pumping weapons into your credit, and there wouldn't be a need to escalate tensions with russia. and this is something the ukrainians are

beginning to understand. foreign minister lab rob says that they are being used, as sometimes said, sometimes regardless of despite what they want and the ukraine has blame the united states and the media for escalating the situation. they have been euclidian officials that have said there is no evidence that the russians are preparing for an invasion and that the only other sides of all receive have been on television and from the mouths of various politicians. there is also an elaborate said, the fear that the, the situation could be could go out spiral out of control because of elements that day, key of that ukraine doesn't control and that is various extremist and volunteer battalions . 5 his on to the tv station near the conflict lines. who could on the orders of someone else carry out a provocation. but to the escalade, things even further,

it's covered up to 16 past the hour. moscow time still to come was ortiz, world news of 11 continues with me, kevin o' it. people in the west live under illusion of freedom with social media, playing a key part in the distorted what you think about that statement nightstand to chew over. that's the conclusion from top philosophy level gigi in his new book, and we talk to him about it and i've got more tonight's news too. after this break, thanks for checking in to join me every 1st aid on the alex simon. sure. but i'll be speaking to guess from the world politics sport, business. i'm show business. i'll see you then. oh, i think wrong when old rules just don't know. i mean you

will, if you have to shape out. this thing becomes the african engagement. it was a trail when so many find themselves well the part we she's to look so common ground. now we know you to see here he will fast as you will fall off the end and the other side of it came home and your back home. so i would like to envision that does it also live and it's just like that one direction from the other side. ah, hello, get national health service stuff. fighting mandatory covert shots, the u. k. court said less than a week to go now before doctors face being fired if they don't,

around 80000 work is still on to nakeila to the head of the deadline to get the 1st job with lawyers warning the government that it hits fundamental freedoms. if people have to give away the bodily autonomy, there is a question over whether they remain free. it is causing an unacceptable level of stress and uncertainty for them. and for the health service and the public. while an age has covert guidance, is that it's employees must have had the 1st vaccine dose by the 3rd of february, unvaccinated style face the fac, if they can't be redeployed to a position that doesn't require interactions, face to face, and patients, a spokes person for the government's department of health and social care stands by the ruling despite pundents restrictions being scrapped in almost all other walks of life in the u. k. now, and it's just medics will know the vaccine mandate is the last straw for them and pandemic bog. by chronic, i'm to funding and then the staffing of the service with health chiefs noticing that the firings will already hurt further road already depleted workforce no

traffic. malik who says signed a declaration of posing mandatory vaccinations. toby bitterly that forcing jobs on people could be a violation of medical ethics to the concept of mandatory vaccination is really knocking down the cornerstone of medical antics that we've enjoyed for century waterloo. tanami, freedom of choice, a tremendous m. s. m stress. i'm just getting inundated messages from health care workers from the whole spectrum of doctors, nurses, audiologist, feeling for their livelihoods and their careers because they're being made to, you know, forced to have a job or choose, you know, being sacked as is, frankly ridiculous. i feel the wind is behind our sales, and i think, you know, we're going to turn this around. i think the public can see for the nonsense household and i more than a to lawmakers. so calling on joe biden to write off student lo debt has promised during the presidential election campaign, but it seems

a biden's in no hurry to carry out his promise. despite students who believe this pledge waiting for months now under the additional strain of the pandemic, we urge you to direct the department of education to publicly released the memo outlining your legal authority to broadly cancel student loan debt and immediately cancel up to $50000.00 of student loan debt for borrower, it comes in date as the u. s. student debt toll hits astonishing amounts, note topping $1.00 trillion dollars, and the birds are still growing an alarming rate at 6 times faster than the national economy is estimated. more than 43000000 people still have unpaid federal student loan debt to the heck of a worry. white house spokesperson said that biden's continuing to look into the issue. last year, the president asked the u. s. education of justice department to prepare memos on his legal authority to cancel student debt. one person who still hasn't paid off his student loan, spoke to us and says the government's got sits priorities wrong. it's

a matter of priority is a matter of where this government puts its priorities and who they put 1st to the posts for students and young people and even people who are well under their forties and fifties that are still paying their student loans back. do they put the middle and working classes, the popular sectors of the population 1st or do they put the huge financial institutions or the military industrial complex person? obviously they have no problems. spending money. they have no problem printing trillions of dollars to prop up big banks. they have no problem doing bank bailouts . they have no problem allowing, you know, speculation on international markets. they have no problem putting these people 1st . essentially, the, all the parks, if you will, of the united states in the world. but when it comes to helping the people, we're lucky if we get a $2000.00 check, which is a drop in the bucket for the united states budget would be the right decision to cancel student loans because so many people are hurting. there's

a 1000000 and one different things that the government could be doing to help the people of this country. at the same time, we see record breaking inflation. we see also record breaking profit by corporations. 2 out of 3 corporations today are doing better economically than they were before the pandemic. and that's at the same time that people are not nowhere near better off than they were before the pandemic and the staying a lot because they weren't doing very well before the pandemic. to begin with, the american federation of teachers have teamed up with southfield online misinformation till news god to warn, tens of millions of children against sites like r t c, a private filtering service. the green lights, mainstream media that the fed to retract major stories in the past. kellum opens, got the latest on it tonight. now there is plenty of fake news these days, flooding the internet. so why not help american school? kids learn how to sift through it, determine who they can trust and who they can't think for themselves. that sounds

pretty reasonable. the american federation of teachers is now stepping up to the plate. the american federation of teachers has launched a national partnership with a leading and time this information tool, news guard to protect, and champion legitimate journalism, and fact based reporting into help educators and their students navigate a see of online disinformation. but it's not just about teaching kids to think critically. the future of the free world is at stake. news guard will save our democracy. young minds must be protected. it is a beacon of clarity to expose the dark depths of the internet and uplift. those outlets committed to truth and honesty rather than falsehoods and fabrications. now with the american federation of teachers, arranging for all of its member educators to have free access to news guard at a time. when misinformation is such a growing threat to public health in our democracy, millions more of america's students will also be news guarding it. whoo! guard makes a special list of outlets that considers to be trustworthy and untrustworthy. and

then it puts a special label in your web browser. now as news guard approves, you get a green label. but if news guard disapproves, you get a red label. so you guessed it, r t and sputnik get a red label. switch off immediately. don't let those russians get inside your head and encourage you to question are fearless american leaders. but what outlets are safe? well, there's buzz feed the guardian, the new york times, the washington post. and don't forget the official u. s. government outlet called the voice of america. now, do you remember when the washington post told us that russia had hacked the power grids? that wasn't true. do you remember when the buzz feed ran with the story about trump, the steel dossier, and that turned out to be from a source that was pretty incredible that he remember when almost all the mainstream media outlets told us that iraq had weapons of mass destruction and we just had to invade deer. remember all the lies we were told in the lead up to the nato

intervention in libya. but let's not be too hard on news guard. after all, they themselves admit these labels are not a measure of factual accuracy. they only label websites that they determined to have a hidden agenda. are green red ratings signal if a website is trying to get it right. or instead has a hidden agenda. war knowingly publishes falsehoods or propaganda getting readers more context about their news online. so it's not about what's really true and what's not true. it's about if you're telling the truth with good intentions or whether or not you're telling the truth in a way that might stir up some trouble. now one of the founders is gordon cravens, a former columnist for the wall street journal, his reporting on the and as a and edward snowden, as been widely criticized. and it appears he was trying to spin things as not so bad on the part of the american government. and then there's richard stang go. he worked at the state department as public affairs chief under barack obama. now he

must be totally opposed to any dis, information or distortions in media, right. well job of the state diploma was what people used to joke as the chief propagandist on that against propaganda. every country does it and they have to do it to their own population. and i don't necessarily think it's that's awful. some conservatives in america feel threatened by the teachers unions embracing news guard. the left is found a dangerous and equally disingenuous. new way to indoctrinate our children without their parents knowing this is as bad as c r t. in fact is worse. unlike c r t, the left is not going to give it a name this time. this is purposely designed to go under the radar of public scrutiny in america, we're always told about those evil totalitarian countries where the government brainwash is children and tells them not to question authority. and here in america were said to be great because we teach our children to have free and open minds and think for themselves. and now we have news guard to make sure that they're free and

open minds are never exposed to anything that might tempt them to question more. kayla martin. r. t. new york. well, talking of christian morrison to chew over on a friday evening, western liberal democrats now live under a full sense of freedom with us practically a civil war. that is what leading philosophers level g check as well, and that is new book of having a disorder. we got the low down a bit more why i think what today really east indic isaacs are western liberal democracy themselves. not blaming one site or the opposite of here, the debbie level off in cuba society, the outrage state policy. but the bishop district who, you know, very strange trade can be done late into political engagement

in the west, kansas. it's much more in the den. so the send off we are saying why we are not even aware of how we are. and because we experience is really do what you want, but there are different, especially digital media. it's not just walk you want to doing what you are doing. right. you stuck somewhere in that new pharmacy big comes over, manipulate your desire, your says you, grayson, bigler is out. she remote at some repairs for talking about the ecology and so on. oh,

it's quite possible that she will lose their elections and then the united states cannot react. so this is the big dust bad now because the state of war, the country rules that you cannot even reason that but dialogue very slow asia there with more new book, less arts. he's world news is 11 with me. kevin, thanks about chicken ever get anything from a stop by to off now or the great company. so be shipping the latest guest after the break. ah, there may or may we serve up in may or may, we should all be angry because i was going all right.

can't understand united states history and the role that slavery plate is already a very formal institution. by the time united states became a nation. it actually find the nation, the rise of capitalism clearly on the backs of flight. and the slave down if you had investigated lynching said a great extent. you can't believe a country. and country still stands in brick. i'm from the south. everybody know, know what their failure to some extent, i would argue that we're still fighting the civil war. and the south is winning exaggerated rhetoric, massive arm shipments and endless threats. this is how nato presents asian and european security. meanwhile, moscow wait to the u. s. and it's always to restore.