i hope that i can my less 3 ah, joe biden plans to position american troops in eastern europe and a show of force against russia. despite nato's chief admitting, there's quote, no certainty about whether russia would invade ukraine. used to be up to the use of it depends on the russian federation, then there will be no war. we don't want any wars, but we will also not allow an interest to be rudely trampled on and ignored amid a growing stand off with the west over ukraine. russia's top diplomat stresses marco does not want conflict, but it security must be in short and health staff soon u. k. government as tens of thousands. faith the sac. if they don't get the coven

job by next week, we get the latest from one of the doctors behind the lawsuit. with broadcasting lot of to rec, from studios in moscow. this is our international. i'm john thomas. certainly glad to have be with us. are now we start tonight with us president joe biden. he says he wants american troops in eastern europe in the near future, and a show of force against russia. despite nato having just backtracked on its months . long narrative of russia as an imminent aggressor with nato's head yawns. stoughton burg admitting there is, quote, no certainty that russia would invade ukraine. and that time, ah, as long as are shut, docile to once again decide to use military force. you know, there's an empty. while there's no certainty about the uh, the russian plans are on the maybe they have not made any final decision. well,

it means we're seeing more and more of a public message shifting regarding what was previously referred to as a russian invasion of ukraine being immediate at just after yen stalsen berg. we've hired vladimir zalinski, the ukrainian president and speaking, saying that he also doesn't particularly see an immediate risk of a russian invasion. and if you take the comments from ads and wednesday from st oldenburg and put them alongside briefings that have been given to the media off the record in brussels, from nato h q that have suggested that there's really a want to get a, a d escalation from the u. s. side that there wasn't really a unanimity amongst nato members that the, the russian troops in the west of russia represented a potential invasion for such, all really, but that the united states as desperate for a d escalation over this issue. because they really want to switch focus over towards china. this is quite a significant switch of pack though,

because if you look at the way this message was put across in the last 2 months, well, was put across very differently. u. s. intelligence officials say russia could invade ukraine as soon as january, and that's because of russian troops that are massed on ukraine's borders are now to see, to russia could at any point, want an attack in ukraine. russia is the aggressor here. we will not accept the campaign rush with waging since averted democratic neighbors against oldenburg also spoken awful. on about the beefing up of nato forces in the east of the alliance. either committing troops towards deployment in the east or troops been ready to deploy to the east. now also on friday was confirmed by the slovakian foreign. yes sir, that his country is in discussion with ne, so for the stationing of troops in slovakia, slovakia does border ukraine, but what was confirmed by yen salton berg on friday also is that there's no plans to send nato troops into ukraine. it's correct that we are not planning to deploy,

nate to combat troops to ukraine, and nevada, great yen salt and berg was also at pains to say that nato was very open to having more talks with russia, particularly when it came to arms control. but this idea of having more talks came at the same time as reports are coming out, that there are plans for a huge sanctions being planned by nato countries, driven by the united states and the united kingdom. the sanctions would target russia's energy and banking sectors. they would kick in, of course, if there was any invasion by russia of ukraine. we spoke to martin dozer of germany is at the left party. he says that the nato chiefs remarks may reflect a growing realization that a war on russia's border can't be one called the 1st step. it's a good step though to stop this program. i don't know which has been proceeded for . let's say 2 or 3 months, no, maybe the need to states,

maybe the u. s. government to states and inside that. so it's not useful to escalate. this is conflict because the kind of room and if you object to flee, it was clear that russia don't have any interest tech ukraine because you claim this exactly on the russian border and it was exactly what steps florida to escalate. that situation will be stupid. so maybe you know, the idea of what u. s. government has changed and the name has changed that they see that a dialogue is a better way to proceed. more chaos has erected in the once water tight relationship between the u. s. mainstream media and give that's after cnn deleted then returned an article revealing ukraine's president told joe biden that america was over playing the imminent russia invasion card or tisa taylor comments. well as

the last few days you crave, i says, has try not a whole a way of contradicting statements from nature. my mistake disagreeing on whether to keep troops in russia to you states disagreeing on whether to send weapons. he at the latest mixed message and quite a mysterious one comes from 2 t claire south washington and keith. now on thursday, the u. s. on ukrainian president had a phone conversation, and the media reported the biden with warning the well, the brink of wild all 3. newton's waiting for the ground to freeze over in february . and that he'll give the signal for an invasion as a landscape for his pot was trying the party to calm his us counterpart down by stating that it's all still ambiguous. it seemed then that the 2 leaders would very much at all a call between us president joe biden and ukrainian president followed him or zalinski on thursday, did not go well. the senior ukrainian official told cnn amid disagreements over the risk levels of a russian attack. zalinski urged his american counterpart to calm down the

messaging warning of economic impact of panic. according to the official, he also said ukrainian intelligence sees the threat differently so quickly such later that on top of all the other disagreements within the e, u and nato. now even washington and kia, who off, quite literally brothers in arms on to, on the same page, but then something but cutely happened less than an hour and a half off to the scene. an article broke. it just disappeared. there was no trace any more of bite and whipping up hysteria about in a wool and zalinski, telling him to calm down on its pace. what a pit? well, a snoo of tweets from c m people on from her field about how the white house disputes, how the coal wasn't a success. in fact, it was all just one big light white house on biden zalinski call. anonymous sources are leaking falsehoods. president biden said that there is a distinct possibility that the russians could invade ukraine and be wary reports

of anything more different than that are completely false on hot on these heels. he also came out claiming that the written article was riddled with mistakes. dear colleagues, some reports regarding the content of the talks between presidents villa, dimmer zalinski and joe biden have appeared on social media. citing the alleged senior ukrainian official. these messages are completely false. so to put it simply, we had an article, citing a senior ukrainian official. now the articles disappeared in a whole army, both in the ukraine and state side out, doing damage control. what happened behind the scenes? it's still a mystery font, understandably, there are lots of questions and what suspicions? why such a shot? 180 who gave the order for the story to be taken down. and so probably not a surprise. biden's critics are calling the transparency. what they want is a transcript of the phone call. will someone ask press secretary if the white house will release the transcript? when will you release the transcript?

what exactly was said in the hour and 20 minute chat between bites and ansolaski is still unclear. what did dynamic between them to lead? is it, it's still unclear? is it indeed true that zalinski was the one telling by to tone down the hysteria? there are a lot of questions that also seems to be the sense that at best this was pool on verify john anderson. and it was, if we're being really cynical, that was something in that article that someone really didn't want to come out. just hours before nato said it had no certainty that russia would invade ukraine. russia's foreign minister sugar lever of spelled out clearly that moscow does not want a war, but he also noted moscow can't just stand by watching its concerns. being ignored. love shared his thoughts during a 90 minute interview to russian journalists. among them was ortiz editor in chief margaret of some one young. here's what mister lever had to say. yes,

this is alicia authorities, kitty jealousy willingly. if it depends on the russian federation, then there will be no war. we don't want any wars, but we're also not allow our interest to be brutally trampled on and ignored. the foreign minister was asked many questions about the tensions about what russia is going to do about them and where ultimately this is all going to lead. when there's going to be a boy, he himself was a much more diplomatic with regards to the america documents, the county proposals to russian security proposals that arrived in moscow just 2 days ago that the united states finally sent and writing, which is something that russia now demands given how in the past that fields are cheated by verbal guarantees that it was given. so now it insists on the, on documents on paper, in writing guarantees, and what much a sort a guarantees that ultimately, if the gist of it is the nato missiles and troops on stationed in the near future

on russia's borders, or any closer to russia's borders than they are now and that is something that, according to many officials, that wasn't included in these documents, he himself, for 4 minutes the labyrinth was much more diplomatic. he said that the, they're analyzing them and that they've received the documents from both the united states and nato at he was much less diplomatic about what he had received from nato . however, or to lug nut fornia. in contrast to what we've received from nato, the american response is almost like a model of diplomatic decency. the response from nato is so ideological, it breeze so much with the exclusivity of the north atlantic lines that i was a little ashamed of those who wrote these taxes previously, we had heard from other officials that the documents, the counter proposal sent by the united states i didn't address a single one of russia's concerns that they made no promises that they feel will

expand further, easter to the ultimately that those and no guarantees that those missiles, they to missiles american missiles and wouldn't be stationed ever closer to russia . nevertheless, he says there is some optimism varies or negotiations. there are tools that are ongoing and perhaps a solution might be reached a solution which satisfies both the united states and russia. nevertheless, we must account. he says for relations relations, which for years i have var deteriorated, which are now at a level that is catastrophic which law which says a lab, rob says a much you to the fault for which is much. and it, i did said sport. what with various demands that they have made over the years with regards to russia, you slew anew. if they insist that they will not change their position, we will not change opposition either. it's just that their position is based on false arguments on a direct turning over the facts and opposition is based on what everyone signed up

under. and here i don't see any room for compromise. otherwise, what is they to agree on? if they frankly sabotage and misrepresent the old decisions, this will be a key test for us. i. marsha was her godsa. what is happening in ukraine of the russian foreign minister also said that the united states and that nasal are pushing ukraine towards an escalation. they are pushing them with a vast amount of arms. we've heard the united states posting about 283 tons of the lethal farms and other equipment that they have delivered to ukraine in the last few months. and this is, this came, was as a boast, the russians say that the ultimately, the united states is using, using ukraine in order to achieve its own goals, which are to contain rush and ultimately focus on china. you for answer your myrna, even of france, germany and the european union called russia, a conflict country. what can be negotiated then?

when they say you must comply with the minsk agreements? we asked them what exactly of these points should russia fulfill? nobody answers the key of realised that berlin in paris would not force it to comply with the minsk agreements. so they understand that now they can do everything, both zalinski and his regime a used 1st of all by the americans in order to escalate tensions. their main goal is not the feature of ukraine, but to heighten tensions around russia and then move on to china. ultimately the russians say that the irony side, the only power on earth that can force the ukrainian government to follow through with a minsk agreements, a comprehensive peace plan to end the civil war. and you credit that the only power that can force you credit of to abide by them is the united states. and it isn't interested them seeing the minsk agreements fulfilled because that would lead to a d escalation. that there wouldn't be a need to keep pumping weapons into your credit, and there wouldn't be

a need to escalate tensions with russia. and this is something we ukrainians are beginning to understand. formalist, elaborate, says that they are being used, as sometimes said, sometimes regardless of despite what they would and ukraine as plane, the united states and the media for escalating the situation that have been ukrainian officials that have said, there is no evidence that the russians are preparing for an invasion and that the only other sides of war with see have been on television and from the mouths of various politicians. there is also an elaborate said, the fear that the, the situation could be it could go out spiral out of control because of elements that die. a key of that ukraine doesn't control and that is various extremist and volunteer. battalion 5 is on to the t station near the conflict lines, who could, on the orders of someone else, carry out a provocation of a could escalate things even further. national health service staff are fighting

mandatory co had shots in the u. k. courts with less than a week to go before doctors face being fired around 80000 workers, still aren't inoculated ahead of the deadline to get the 1st job with lawyers warning the government that it hits fundamental freedoms. if people have to give away the bodily autonomy, there is a question over whether they remain free. it is causing an unacceptable level of stress and uncertainty for them. and for the health service and the public. and a chest covered guidance is that it's employees must have had their 1st vaccine dose by the 3rd of february, unvaccinated staff faced the sac. if they cannot be re deployed to a position that does not require interaction with patients, is spokesperson for the government's department of health. and social care stands by the ruling. despite pandemic restrictions being scrapped in almost all other walks of life in the okay. the n h. s. medics warned vaccine mandate is the last

straw. and a pandemic marked by chronic under funding and under staffing of the service. with health chiefs noting that the firings will further hurt an already depleted workforce, dr. ahmed malik, who has signed a declaration opposing mandatory vaccination, says that forcing jobs could be a violation of medical ethics. the concept of mandatory vaccination really knocking down the cornerstone of medical antics that we've enjoyed for century wanted the tanami freedom of choice, a tremendous amount and stress. i'm just getting inundated messages from health care workers from the whole spectrum of doctors, nurses, audiologist, feeling for their livelihoods and their careers because they're being made to, you know, forced to have a job or choose, you know, being sacked is frankly ridiculous. i feel the wind is behind our sales, and i think, you know,

we're going to turn this around. i think the public can see for the nonsense. ah, the american federation of teachers has teamed up with self styled online misinformation tool news guard to warn tens of millions of children against sites like our teeth. yet the private filtering service green lights, mainstream media that have had to retract major stories in the past or just kill them up and comments. now there is plenty of fake news these days, flooding the internet. so why not help american school? kids learn how to sift through it, determine who they can trust and who they can't think for themselves. the sounds pretty reasonable. the american federation of teachers is now stepping up to the plate. the american federation of teachers has launched a national partnership with a leading and time this information tool, news guard to protect, and champion legitimate journalism, and fact based reporting and to help educators and their students navigate a see of online disinformation. but it's not just about teaching kids to think critically. the future of the free world is at stake. news guard will save our

democracy. young minds must be protected. it is a beacon of clarity to expose the dark depths of the internet and uplift. those outlets committed to truth and honesty rather than falsehoods and fabrications. now with the american federation of teachers, arranging for all of its member educators to have free access to news guard at a time. when misinformation is such a growing threat to public health in our democracy, millions more of america students will also be mused guarding it. whoo! guard makes a special list of outlets it considers to be trustworthy and on trustworthy. and then it puts a special label in your web browser. now as news guard approves, you get a green label. but if news guard disapproves, you get a red label. so you guessed it, r t and sputnik get a red label. switch off immediately. don't let those russians get inside your head and encourage you to question are fearless american leaders. but what outlets are

safe? well, there's buzz feed the guardian, the new york times, the washington post. and don't forget the official u. s. government outlet called the voice of america. now, do you remember when the washington post told us that russia had hacked the power grids? that wasn't true. do you remember when the buzz feed ran with the story about trumping the steel jar, ca, and that turned out to be from a source that was pretty incredible that he remember when almost all the mainstream media outlets told us that iraq had weapons of mass destruction and we just had to invade deer. remember all the lies. we were told in the lead up to the nato intervention in libya. but let's not be too hard on news guard. after all, they themselves admit these labels are not a measure of factual accuracy. they only label websites that they determined to have a hidden agenda are green red radio signal if a web site is trying to get it right. or instead has a hidden agenda. war knowingly publishes falsehoods or propaganda getting readers

more context about their news on line. so it's not about what's really true and what's not true. it's about if you're telling the truth with good intentions or whether or not you're telling the truth in a way that might stir up some trouble. now one of the founders is gordon cravens, say, former columnist for the wall street journal. his reporting on the and as a and edward snowden has been widely criticized and it appears he was trying to spin things as not so bad on the part of the american government. and then there's richard stengel. he worked at the state department as public affairs chief under barack obama. now he must be totally opposed to any dis information or distortions in media. right. well, job of the state diploma was what people used to joke as the chief propagandist. i'm not against propaganda. every country does it and they have to do it to their own population. and i don't necessarily think it's that's awful. some conservatives in america feel threatened by the teachers unions embracing news guard. the left is found

a dangerous and equally disingenuous. new way to indoctrinate our children without their parents knowing this is as bad as c r t. in fact is was unlike c r t, the left is not going to give it a name this time. this is purposely designed to go under the radar of public scrutiny in america. 6 we're always told about those evil totalitarian countries where the government brainwash has children and tells them not to question authority. and here in america were said to be great because we teach our children to have free and open minds and think for themselves. and now we have news guard to make sure that they're free and open minds are never exposed to anything that might tempt them to question more. caleb martin, r t new york, western liberal democracies, now live under a false sense of freedom with the us practically and civil war. that's what leading philosophers level asian has warned in his new book, heaven in disorder. we got the low down on why i

think what today really is indic. isaac's are western leave that democracy themselves. i not blaming one site or the other here, the dairy level off in cuba society, the outrage state policy. but the bishop district who, you know, very strange trace can be done slate into political engagement in the west cancer. it's much more in the sense off we are while we are not even aware of how we are. and because we experience ourselves, do what you want, but there are different,

especially digital media. it's not what you want to doing, what you are doing piece. thank you. stuck somewhere to death. new pharmacy big. you can manipulate your desire. your says yes, this is grayson bigler. she promote that some look for talking about all of the ecology and so on, but it's like, well, she believed that she knew it was them, there are elections and then united states can knock a yak. so b, c, b, they are now in a war that the country wrong through that you cannot even that he's in the dialogue

in peace, daddy. that does a for me, this hour. i will be back with a look at your headlines and let's say 35 minutes. this is our international, but everybody's ah, ah, ah, ah

exaggerated rhetoric, massive arm shipments and endless threats. this is how nato presents is vision of pan european security. meanwhile, moscow wait for the u. s, and it's always to respond to it's demands and vision for the say. the status quo is untenable. is the earth's still large enough to satisfy the ambitions of jeff bezos? you know, it's got its tentacles in so many aspects of the economy. there's nothing that amazon is i'm trying to get into to step by step. the amazon empire has extended its grip on the world that walks like a dog, inquired like a dog hits a dog. so amazon looks like monopoly trades like a monopoly makes money like monopoly behaves like monopoly. amazon essentially controls the market place. it's not really a market as a private arena,

a world where a single company controls the distribution of all day, the products and the infrastructure of our economy. is this the world according to amazon? ah, those incidents of havana syndrome, as you mentioned before, things like difficulty concentrated insomnia memory problems there. so vague, asked to be experienced by just about everyone who was ever lived in any given week . right. and so now people all over the world who are military personnel, or intelligence officers or diplomats working for the american government, are now on the lookout for these anomalous help incidence in literally, people are getting up in the morning and sneezing and attributing it to a band syndrome, i mean because it's so beg your

challenge, you know, the geography nutrition with chinese students and the sub garage over shakeelah. hi sharon, my name is rob lee with latoya this new group with she been wholesale learning, kelly, recruiting, quote, and i renewed my for my 2 year. sure. thousands of london q 2. i learned that before she gave us times to i must be lucky. i am a sophomore go, you know, if that will come up. i don't know. christie asked him, you myakea to push him. um we'll see. we get martha. a love thank

without federal enforcement of the new civil rights legislation. the states enacted the black codes, these punitive laws restricted the movement of blacks, read the labor economy against them, and doomed them to low wages and debt. the laws also opened the door to the widespread use of conduct leasing, which was just another form of slavery. so if you broke these laws, then you could be imprisoned for it. and so then that starts the cycle of people going to prison for really trivial reasons. but getting caught up in the system because then if a white land older or business person pay fare fine than they had to work off that fine. and so you could be years maybe for the rest of your life in these situations

because these people were not an investment like they had been during slavery so you can work them into get them replace and move on to plessy versus ferguson supreme court decision in 1896 created separate but equal the legal separation between black and white. it's always been hard for me to believe that these so called jim crow laws that blatantly discriminated against african americans remained in place until 1964. jim crow created america's own system of apartheid. jim crow was really born in the south, although it would, it would go nor certainly, but in the south it would become legal. it would become part of state laws, local laws. in the north we became kind of part of the custom but not necessarily part of the law.