Skip to main content

tv   News  RT  January 30, 2022 5:00pm-5:30pm EST

5:00 pm
a with to write in the stories and shape the way ukraine dominated. both the headlines in the minds of nato states with lethal arms, ammunition, and military equipment handed over to care for the u. s. and u. k. prepared to send troops to eastern europe on that from the you. k later today . but not all night. so members agree to weaponized ukraine. germany was slammed by allies for going against the blocks line while some spanish opposition party say it's not their country's war to wage. least conflict. we are not interested in any worse. all this is a pro cation of the united states and nato in an attempt to reshape the world order in which they are lose an influence. elsewhere this weekend, candidates prime ministers reportedly rushed to
5:01 pm
a safe evacuation site. this more than 10000 truckers on the supporters flood parliament hill and opposition to vaccine mandates with russia. the usual suspects behind a mass movement. tell me more about that plus to a solution to pursue. whoops, well, joe biden called on my consulting a fox news journalist who was just trying to get answers about record inflation plaguing the u. s. we went shopping in new york city to see just how prices are being affected there and ask local how much is hitting them in that pocket. you have to, you have to make concessions to, to fit your budget, to, to buy the essential things to feed. your families. got 3 kids in the cost. the food is going up. i drive the car almost every day, the cost, the gas going up. i don't use anything with
5:02 pm
welcome to the week here around in the big stories brought you here. we're not in national over the last 7 days, kevin, over here, this just passed one of the morning moscow time. so then the weeks or a nato countries pouring weapons and military equipment into great britain's announce what it's called, its biggest possible offer to nate. so major military deployment to eastern european and that's with on that may be coming later today. the you can then if the u. k. then if so, following a similar line to washington with president biden pledging to send more american troops to the region. in the near future, the pentagon had already put 8500 soldiers on standby for possible deployment or to deter russia. but now even kiev is urging com instead of panic, claiming it won't be attacked despite repeated warnings to the country from the u. s. i, we're moving us to, sir, you are for the nato countries. in the near term, these would be additional brigade combat teams with just dick's personnel. medical support, a variation support intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance,
5:03 pm
as well as transportation and maybe even some additional capabilities after that. those are that you lots of search, power, militarism appears in the media and i asked to reduce the intensity that exist today. little the situation is quite clear to us. there is no reason for us to panic, no grounds for searching and full scale countries. james country, it is even physically impossible to achieve or not some of them, you know, a little native members uniting and weaponized in ukraine and germany refused to send arms and also said it's ruling out of creating its embassy. this move would only add to tensions berlin elsa doesn't believe this. any immediate son of ukraine jordan make to alliance. every one knows that this is not on the agenda at the moment, including russia, the people of ukraine, one to live in peace and security. many have been separated from their families for years due to the conflicts in the dumbass. that's what the matter is about. not an imminent entry into nato. there was nothing mitten in ohio, that war is looming right now in the middle of europe, a smart doing everything we can to prevent a military escalation of the situation. of course,
5:04 pm
we do not deliver weapons to ukraine, is about keeping the peace lasting peace order in europe would not work with our russia. dell but only with russia in over cracks, whole submerged inside another nato member, which is already said to navy vessels to the black sea spain. this pledged its full support to the block, but some of the opposition and not in favor. the move. no. so local, more we is one of the signatories of this manifest. so, and the bulk of those who made the formation of the current government possible. believe that firstly, spain has no place in this conflict. we are not interested in any worse. all this is a pro cation of the united states and nato, in an attempt to reshape the world order in which they are losing influence. the us openly, it meets. this is very important for its national security. so the u. s. and they to are escalating tensions the united states and nato want on the one hand to control europe and on the other latin americans literally crush. and everyone who
5:05 pm
questioned the hegemony of the united states was in the united states. and they to want to direct the resources of control europe and latin america to attack those whom they consider their main threat in this whole story. neither spain or the e. u has any row our troops should not become cannon fodder for this most enormous machine of genocide in history for nato vienna of friday, russia's top diplomat spelled out clearly of the country does not want war, but it can't also be allowed. so says interests ignored for a minute, the secular ro shed is those during a 90 minute interview to russian media. use for your facility. if it's up to russia, there will be no war. we don't want any wars. but ignoring our interest is not something we can allow either. americans are trying to create a hysteria of the escalation around ukraine, burrell and blink, and repeating it to some kind of a mantra. they say we hope that raja is going to choose the path of diplomacy and i
5:06 pm
can tell you that is something we've always stuck to since soviet times. and the outcomes of this diplomacy include the eastern bull and astronaut declarations, stipulating that no one is going to strengthen their security at the expense of others. this is the embodiment of diplomacy. i need mobil power proposal to nato might seem exceptional, only if the experts who assist these proposals assume that the americans have already taken everything around. so why bother put up with that? confine yourself to the bare minimum, but we want them to work with us with honesty. the day before yesterday we received their response and obfuscate things as the west is prone to do. but still there are some responses to our basic questions. in particular, with regards to intermediate and short range missiles, we also offered to withdraw military exercises further from the border on both sides. there were other measures on de escalation. they were ignored for several years, but now nater seems to be willing to talk about that. it's
5:07 pm
a lease something isn't that was the president has already given an answer to that. if our attempts to agree on mutually acceptable principles of ensuring euro atlantic security fail, we're going to take measures in response with regard to what kind of measures he said that they can be different and will be based on the information provided by our military. if they insist that they would not change their position, we will not do it either because their position is based on distortion of facts. and our position is based on what everyone's put their signature on. i don't see the grounds for reaching the compromise here because they are, you still seeing the previous decisions that were commonly adopted. virginia, so as for the sanctions, when our president spoke, in particular, we told the americans that the package of sanctions, including russia's disconnection from the financial systems, controlled by the west, would be equivalent to the severance of diplomatic ties. we gave a clear message and i think we understand it. i don't think it serves anybody's
5:08 pm
interests loop. there we reported all their thoughts water tight relationship between the u. s. the mainstream media and cave came into question in the week after seeing and deleted with then reinstated an article alleging that the ukranian president told joe biden that america was over play the eminent russian invasion cod. saskia taylor covered that on thursday the you as an ukrainian president had a phone conversation and the media reported the biden was warning the well the brink of world war 3 hooton's waiting for the ground to freeze over in february. and that he'll give the signal for an invasion, zaleski, the, his part was trying the package to calm his you asked counterpart down by stating that it all still ambiguous. it seemed and that the 2 leaders would very much at odds. a call between us president joe biden and ukrainian president volume or zelinski on thursday did not go well. a senior ukrainian official told cnn amid disagreements over the risk levels of a russian attack. so lensky urge his american counterpart to come down the
5:09 pm
messaging warning of the economic impact of panic. according to the official, he also said ukrainian intelligence sees the threat differently. so it quickly thought later that on top of all the other disagreements within the e u. a nato now, even washington and kia, who off, quite literally brothers in arms on to, on the same page. but then something acutely happened. less than an hour and a half off to the see in an article broke, it just disappeared. there was no trace any more bite and whipping up his theory about him in a wall and the landscape telling him to come down on its pace. what a pit? well, a few of tweets from cnn people on farther afield about how the white house dispute, how the call wasn't a success. in fact, it was all just one big lie. whitehouse on biden's lensky call. anonymous sources are leaking falsehoods. president biden said that there is a distinct possibility that the russians could invade ukraine in february,
5:10 pm
reports of anything more different than that, are completely false, and hot on the heels. he also came out claiming that the original article was riddled with mistakes. dear colleagues, some reports regarding the content of the talks between presidents villa dimmer zelinski and joe biden have appeared on social media. citing the alleged senior ukrainian official. these messages are completely false. to put it simply, we had an article site in a senior ukrainian official. now the article disappeared in a whole army, both in the ukraine state side, out, doing damage control. what happened behind the scenes? it's still a mystery font, understandably, there are lots of questions and what suspicions? why such a sharp? 118 who gave the order for the story to be taken down. and so prob, late not a surprise, biden's critics are calling the transparency. what they want is a transcript of the phone call. will someone ask, press secretary if the white house will release the transcript?
5:11 pm
when will you release the transcript? what exactly was said in the hour and 20 minute chat between bites and ansolaski is still unclear. what did dynamic between them to lead to says it's still unclear. is it indeed true that zelinski was the one telling by to tone down the hysteria that are a lot of questions that also seems to be the sense that at best this was poor, unverified journalism. and it was, if we're being re cynical, that was something in that article that someone really didn't want to come out. and other developments for the way just gotten the current simmering tensions than russia are agree to move planned naval drills further from the coast of island after the irish government and fishing communities expressed concern about potential damage that the exercises could cause to the area in response to the request and minister of defense of the russian federation sake, a chicago has made a decision as a gesture of good will to relocate the exercises. but the russian navy plan for
5:12 pm
february said to february 8th, outside the irish exclusive economic zone with the aim not to hinder fishing activities by irish vessels in the traditional fishing areas. moscow just announced that it will move its naval drills scheduled for next week, which were originally set to take place in international waters, just about 150 miles off the coast of ireland. now that's after irish fishing authorities said that moscow was well within its rights to carry out these plans, but it would disrupt fishing activities in the area. so they asked if they could be relocated. we also heard from the iris, foreign minister, who pointed to the recent tensions around the conflict in ukraine, russia and the international law of the sea can of course, undertake military exercises in international waters. this isn't the time to increase military activity, intention in the context of what's happening with ukraine at the moment. now, as the iris foreign minister pointed outright there, there's nothing illegal about russia carrying out military drills in international
5:13 pm
waters. something that's been in the works for quite a while now, but moscow sees the decision as a gesture of good will, considering the fact that the western media has been hyping up, claims accusing russia of planning to invade ukraine for months now. and that diplomacy has been facing, set back after set back concerning this issue. so while tensions do remain high, at least ireland and russia can see, i hear good to hear no token of tensions being high this weekend. canadian problem is just in true. those reportedly been rushed to a secret secure evacuation location for protection this weekend as more than 10000 truckers and their freedom convo supporters to send on parliament hill in the capitol over the national food supply crisis of the drivers who told no job, no job. these drone pictures see good picture of it as a mass crowds and vehicles block key roads around the polymer building, protest as brave extreme cold warnings to vent the passionate opposition to vaccine mandates and other pandemic restrictions. they have
5:14 pm
a moment at our time to take our country back respected. i've been going on for way too long. debo needed to do their own thing and have a great day beauty. there's a lot, you know, just one problem lose. the whole thing in general society itself has been overtaken by fear. this convoy is all about freedom. it's not only with the truck drivers, it's actually for every single person you, me, buddy, down the road. it doesn't matter, it's all about your free choice. that's what it should be. like i said, if you're vaccinated, cool, you did it. most people did it because it worked, but you know, you should do it off of free will off of your own choice. meanwhile, the country's help lawmakers are trying to demonize the rallies with trudeau himself, front of him on acceptable now along with a public safety chief dubbing, demonstrate his extremists. and in a repeat of practically every big north american political story. in recent years with 0 evidence does to be said,
5:15 pm
canada's top state broadcast and that was claim the russians shield and even started the entire mass public move concerned that russian actors could be continuing to fuel things as this as this protest grows. but perhaps even instigating it from, from the outset. i spoke to economists north jeffrey tucker about it. he thinks canadians frustration of the government mandates a completely justifiable. so the problem is you've got a fringe minority out there, imposing these restrictions against vast majority of canadians and they're fed up every time somebody complains about having to put on a mask or get a forced jab or having the business shot or having the travel restrict or something like that, they're called an extreme as to road. now, if you're a tool of russia, you know, it's just too much and, and the propaganda is completely out of control. i don't see how this ends without, you know, just tremendous resignations on the part of the elected politicians and the administrative state. i think we're about to discover what this looks like. what
5:16 pm
happens when the vast majority rise up against the tiny fringe minority that have been ruined over thanks for watching exactly 60 minutes past 1 in the morning. moscow time, but we have a thomas with him. let me tell you book. so what we don't come up after the break then as our news continued, an angry joe biden uses an expletive to insult a reporter, asked him about how inflation said for $48.00 high under his watch. ouch, kevin, over here. we'll check that out. i'm more off to the break. ah ah.
5:17 pm
join me every thursday on the alex salmon? sure. i'll be speaking the guess when the world of politics, sport business, i'm sure business. i'll see you then. ah.
5:18 pm
but it says i'm to the best of us, but a hot mike moment cold to barrison for joe biden. the wig, let me tell you about that. i've used conference the president was asked about the record inflation currently blighting the u. s. with one journalist getting back a bit more than he'd expected. oh as well. it was a nasty boost baby and befitting the president. but that is imagine he was, he was stressed right. he. he needed an outlet. was a silly moment. we will have moments like that, but the issue here is the subject neither not is inflation because there are, there are 2 explanations for what but, and said the 1st is that perhaps he was kidding. you know, he was angry. this is an outlet, again, again for his stress, for his ag. and the 2nd option, which is even scarier is that he actually believes that inflation is
5:19 pm
a great asset. i'm you fall to brought, you felt that the inflation that has ripped the world, not, not only of, of the past year, but over the past 2 years of the course of the pandemic. you walk into a shop, you look at the process. this is, this is evelyn fuel, for our cars, clothes, for food, the prices and in supermarkets, i mean cars, computers. everything's gone up into the stratosphere. nobody's gaining from this. people are literally watching that their salaries, their wages, especially people have a fixed income, or even worse, poor people, low income people. they are watching their salaries, they're purchasing power evaporate. so it is incredibly strange reading, reading what some and the media wrote. and i'd like to note that this is, this is left wing media that inflation is somehow a good thing, why inflation can actually be good for every day americans in bad for rich people. why the inflation we're seeing now is
5:20 pm
a good thing why inflation might actually be good for the economy. those headlines that some of them have apologized the authors. they have been ridiculed to such an extent that they had to, they had to go back on, on what they wrote because there is, there is no justified in the sort of the says we, we are seeing in the united states, right, inflation, that is an absolute record in 40 years and 40 years. i mean the, the, the numbers are absolutely tremendous how much people are using career, isn't that this is all happening will part of the reason quarter is the pandemic. but there is also the printing press on which the united states to a, to, to a greater extent than the european central bank to a less extent, quintin trillions, trillions. they ran these for, for so long. they give our people checks, covered checks, and more people used these co rejects for it is by basic necessities. they, they went for electronics,
5:21 pm
they went from for luxury things. and what this did is these caused inflation supplier supply chains already disrupted theory with a combat. all of this is to it for, for central banks we, we've all heard, you know, central banks, high rates or whatever, and we'll wait for what the hell that mean. what it means that by way of increasing the interest from all loans, central banks cool off an economy by making sure there's less money to go around. the problem here is that the united states is now $29.00 trillion dollars in debt. $29.00 trillion dollars in debt and if they hike rates, they, if they hi, grades long term. so for example, for, for 56 years, the issue will be that they're going to make much more payments, many more payments on the existing debt. so for them it would be like, shooting themselves in the foot. so they're trying to balance the needs of the economy versus the,
5:22 pm
the outcry from the public and from the people. and try to squeeze by are either pleasing, ultimately, no one ah said, correspond, right. should be hungry, the desk is 0. this next, this is not america any more that so a passenger on spirit airlines reacted when stopped told him to replace his mouth because it bore a political slogan against joe biden. adam raton. yeah. told that. so you say his name says it's a violation of his freedom of speech. not america anymore. the america anymore. the company here. if i had a b, l, a mass guy, what did have been ok, what does that mean? like lives that are know what does that grand in? what does that mean? it's my name. but isn't it freedom of speech that have the mask on? is it, is it a freedom to see? i just, i can't, we are massive has lots of brandon. is this anybody i don't understand
5:23 pm
the not happy will the videos of making the rounds of social networks racking up about 400000 views on tick tock, a load. it happened on a flight from cleveland, tampa, with the flight to tad, and say it was unacceptable for him to display that political statement that slogan, tomato, selves. let's go. brandon has become code for insulting president 5, and i can never quite work it out. but i'll try to explain it. it started during an interview with nascar driver brandon brown, a few months ago when he was being interviewed by mbc reporter for putting a race, the crowd behind it was chanting. won't say, explained to joe by the report i was saying this co brandon. i told you kind of play to the arguments about that will go on and on. but anyway, let's talk about it. we've journey to, pleasant company to chadwick, more chadwick, ringing my ears. i fly with british airways, so i know all about it. the legalese is, conditions of courage, ready by a ticket to go into play and it's a kind of a contract, isn't it? and if you know, spirit contract was, you can't wear this kind of thing. then what's the problem there or where they out
5:24 pm
of order, let me know. well, if the contract says you can't wear offensive clothing, then what is offensive? that's all subjective, that's of the beholder. you make the point that if someone wearing black lives matter mass, plenty of people, if i met offensive, they think it's a dog whistle for communism, for violence, things of this nature. the word that works would be asked to reboot the math. obviously not. there's also the other thing, this man was also wearing a let's go brandon sweatshirt, us after webster, because that might be a little more complicated, but he was asked, replaces math. so interesting, you know, if it depends on what the base now if a part of the contract you signed by flying the airlines is they will not discriminate against the political leanings. so that's another issue there as well . i mean, the guys making a political messaging. no, you know what's, what's that there's nothing profane in the saying, let's go brandon, but it is code word for an export it. so it's not, it's not directly probate or,
5:25 pm
or effective. maybe what if any one person would make the other person laugh. so the slides, flight crew, they have low days. they've got a lot to deal with. maybe just an off day for flight crew personally thought she was doing the right thing. was it really such a big violation of his freedom of speech, or was he right? well, especially on spirit airlines. they have to deal with a lot. we've all seen how rowdy, those flights can get it 1st amendment right is obviously the 1st amendment pertains to the government, but you do get into interesting territory with the 1st amendment that we see this with big tech companies. sensor people over political speech is just to what extent are these really private companies if they are critical government, critical infrastructure like the airlines are if they receive a grant from the government subsidy from the government, if they're actually heavily regulated by the us government do are they then required to respect the person that rights the passengers know this question doesn't really get addressed much. so the easy answer is, well,
5:26 pm
this is an airline. their private company, they can do anything they want, but it gets a little trickier when you look at just how closely related a lot of the industries are with the federal government and whether or not they are required to respect the 1st amendment that they're allowed. you will did then she was a big pictures as part of a, a broader censorship of opinions these days of people are not in favor of jo. bye. would you say maybe maybe we absolutely see that. and obviously any far left political messaging would never be censored. so say one of these big corporations, but you see this all the time with anything that slightly makes fun of joe biden goes against the left. they are obviously right for the censored, and people who, who celebrate those, that slogan, area are called the most horrible things in the world. so it's, it's very corporate america, very left leaning these days. certainly go ahead and, and with, with what we expect. got a corporations, has it, but as a to ration lately in the u. s. and freedom of speech job there, you know what you've got? what did have been? okay, absolutely. i mean, it's really kind of terrifying,
5:27 pm
horrible stuff. big tech is where we focus mostly on this and you have everything from. if you challenge bid narrative to lockdown, you're not just insulting democrats and making fun of joe biting. but the huge problem in this is the land that the 1st amendment is supposed to be. the envy of the world brought the west and it's certainly under attack. we don't have congress doing much to protect free speech. and the 1st amendment to rate in corporations might be targeting, people are harassing people because of their political views. their political messaging has happened in this case it's, it's a very good situation and it doesn't seem to be getting better anytime soon. one of those pesky critics has said the us is currently extremely politically divided. is it? it is, but you know, the left is calm down a lot since they've got congress and the president the so i think from conservative view here, it says you live in big liberal cities. they calm down a little bit. things are scary. they used to be a conservative or a trump supporter, but it's certainly not extremely divided place and it's only going to get worse
5:28 pm
after the midterm. this year, chattering more jealous mil compensate for i was lucky to have in the program that you get on with the day. thank you very much. thank you. my pleasure. and thank you watching as well 28 minutes past one of the morning. that's the snapshot of some of the big news headlines brought over the last 7 days on the weekly moscow. it's been kevin reporting. have a good rest of your weekend review. and thanks for checking with our international ah, what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy even foundation, let it be in arms. race is on often very dramatic development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical of time. time to sit down and talk
5:29 pm
with paris, paris champs. all down through here. all initial wires over here. there wasn't any in here. this was all grown up. overgrown really up high. those camps are up a little bit further so you're camps are always a little nicer than this, but this is, this is evidence of absolute poverty, despair. people in our city and other cities all across america are living like this in survival mode and struggle with
5:30 pm
to give up already for it already is there. so i'm david brown and i am the co founder was my wife linda of eden village, which is where we are right now. this is in springfield, missouri, and it is a tiny, really tiny home village that we have created to house chronically, almost disabled people. ah, this is a typical home, however, they're all the same. they're decorated, they're really painted differently. but the floor plans the same for they're about 400 square feet. perfect size for an individual to live comfortably. you can see by looking around. it has all the appliances that you would have in your home and it's decorated to feel homey. we want to make sure that they are welcome and feel like.

26 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on