have grown out and dangerous confrontation between russia and the west, particularly nato. and as we all know, the crisis is already affecting the global economy. with high energy prices and supply chain destructions said to fuel inflation then slow and growth. and india cannot skimp these medications. and of course the, the larger issue is that the rest is and i think it's supposed to walk ties with moscow despite the risk of meeting strategic instability globally. in fact, the u. s. live response appeals in that affecting regime change in moscow eventually . so this is a critical modeling, the national relations, and i think they have been miscalculations both by president gotten and also by the western block. well, i think nato countries would surely say miscalculations would be made in deli why

when albania, in the united states had the chapter 7 motion water down to chapter 6. did. did prime minister moody say he wouldn't supported? why did they not supported when there's a time of war? and certainly here the view is that any refusal to vote with washington and nato prolongs the misery of ordinary ukrainians. what would be achieved by condemning russia? condemning a country for the sake of condemning it doesn't want foreign policy interest yet never, and even the boss can then i states for reading iraq or libya or any other country condemnation is strong part of indian diplomacy. in any case, russia and the united states are both close friends of india to

walk into the magic tightrope. that's to do a balancing act which are becoming moving me. this is called given the fact that what they see is that been of a nuclear wall. that's going to seriously compound in this strict challenges also affect its close defense stays with moscow. for example, given the financial tension said, the west, as imposing in russia. how will it be? what the weapons at bias from russia? there's just one or many things and there's also investing in russian oil and gas sector implants to invest in the russian far east. all these plans truck defy given these mounting sanctions like it's russia. so for india, this is, the crisis really is complicating it's diplomacy and

also it's pursuit of long terms credited interest complicating it or speeding up the adoption by india of alternative methods of financing. as opposed to say the brussels based swift system and others. now, india can use new methods of financing, often disgusted bricks meetings, shang, i cooperation, organization meetings. no, no line move would meetings. so many trans national meetings that have occurred over the past. what 50 years? 70 since world war 2. you ask the right and i think by eliminating the system of weaponized thing and imaging pipeline. and by cutting rochelle off from western lead institution is

the us is actually undermining those very institutions because countries will be forced to choose alternatives or develop alternatives. so russia example will have to trade in rebel and ruby as it did bring the solid ice. so any guidance situation? well, have to be met with innovative methods. so i don't expect the russia and the relationship to snap because of the financial fractions, require a lot of work. both in utopia must go to maintain in relationship. that's why, for so many decades, in fact, it has,

it has solidified. despite the profound changes in the world, in the past half a century, that relationship has been seen in new delhi as a relationship that they've tried and tested trend. but at the same time, and i see it has also become increasingly important in. so how does india balance to important relationships in a new cornwall? that's going to be a huge challenge for policy makers in new delhi. well, some would say it's very easy and your hesitancy is because as you know her, he well. and because you see china is a big adversary, that it may necessitate closer ties between your pho e across the valley between pakistan and india, and china. and that's why you're hesitant about this closer relationship with russia without the u. s. and nato countries evolve because it will necessitate

closer relationships with china. that's your problem. and surely, and to the blink and the former west exec consultant who's now secretary of state that learn jake sullivan, realized full well that there are dangers of moving russia closer to currencies other than the dollar. and his thought on par made the calculation bennett from the dollar. well you, you brought in china, which is so important. look at the international crisis that was created even before fortran launched the invasion of ukraine. yet how many people in the world know that for the past 22 months, india has faced it. chinese aggression, exaninth aggression and roaming up to 200000 chinese troops. that invasion or whatever you call it, began in april 2020. when try these forces furtively

encroach on several key border areas in the northern was indian region of the dock . since then the military build ups have only escalated creating the danger of a full scale wall. well, we, we invite the chinese ambassador to the un united nation, but basically, what, so your point and the point of many in the leads in india is they don't want us to abandon its relationship with russia because they went to russia alongside them in their attack. on china, russia and india had fairly similar views on stability in asia, or, or eurasia. and that bilateral relationship has stood the test of time. china,

clearly an important factor in this relationship. even in this present military crisis, based with the russians have been a social help for india, especially in helping get to fortify its defenses. so that really underscore the importance of russia for india. i don't think you can afford to see that relationship degrade in any manner, but i wrote it clea, the pakistani prime minister iran guy was in moscow at the time that we put in was gaily planning, sending the troops into ukraine. brazil is not being that supportive of nato countries in washington bricks. never been stronger than that. now given that brazil india and india is perceived. emily nuclear fellow enemy, back as soon so they all seem to be against the nato and the u. s. line.

well, but india is in the unique position of having to nuclear adversary's china and focused on that i actually close alliance. so i would say starting to drive in which means china and pockets and given that stark reality. and given the fact that drake's increasingly has come under the chinese shadow, india has to be very cautious in relying on pricks as a institution. the bricks has value, but pricks is currently not a credible alternative to other international institutions. but it's very

much investment in bricks, but so there are going to exaggerate the importance of bricks. the fact is that a country like india, given this security predicament, has to deal with the realities that it faces. what, what is, what do you expect? the u. s. and nato to do to india because of its lack of support, arguably for the civilians dying in the streets of ukraine. what has the american president spoken, even though word on the chinese potent ration against india has any less than the head of government supported india in the current crisis that in that conference, usually chinese aggression answer is no. so why should be out and supporting the western stands against russia, and he doesn't have

a dog in the fight against nothing, from taking a position that could undermine its relationship with moscow. in the same time, india has done not seem to undercut it's important relationship, but with washington. and they are people in the state department who have set on set off the record, the media, the understanding the as lemme and the dollar my. so why abstain from the security council? i don't i don't see how the us auditor went to prevention india just because in the abstain from from a lot the un security council for his brother lading. i'll stop you there. more from the national security specialist and emeritus professor of strategic strategies at new daily's set of policy research after this break.

ah ah, not another way you while you easy while furnace us. ah . yeah. do you want like yes south. yeah. thrashing south with a new dock. awesome boys. now watch them up all me at the table up. i picked them up. is emily apples getting from sheila vicious kim's room? shes thoughtfully safe a. yes my thought or jane in the again the audio fortune

bri up no bill at about this morning. just financial ah. a welcome back. i'm still here with reciprocity laney international security specialist, and americans professor of strategic studies and new delhi center for policy research. so india attacks shiner over perceived, you and violations un resolution violations but refuses to attack russia. after the secretary general of the united nations said it violated international

law. well in yeah, never attacked china over while any, any un resolutions, curtis eyes, china for violating bilateral agreements, binding bilateral agreements. of course, many violet violated while it bilateral agreement to wiley the national law because bilateral agreements are bought and partial of international law. yeah. not even un resolutions. and yet with russia, you won't vote with international law or against moscow. well, if you look at the history of this century alone, they have been so many multiple foreign, military and nations of sovereign states in this century alone. the 2000 began with the us invasion of afghanistan, then followed an invasion, which was monday by a un resolution. while the un has become increased marginalized and

un stamp of approval on anything mean little humans, camera pro can come even ran a country flow to international law. for example, the us invasion of iraq and occupational the country using the protects, that they were weapons of mass destruction in iraq have the human stamp of approval . but that'll make a legitimate international law s b, c. it is powerful against the policy and policy against the powerful that's the harsh reality might makes right is still very much intact and what it was century example today the western block talks

about upholding the rules based order what, what the order is back. the fact is that those look at in order others make the routes for the world have been ivy crane weapon ising energy revenue being served is certainly not upholding enrolled space. well, one can mention syria, afghans, town iraq, livia and so on. but then the view of prime minister moody is 2 wrongs. make a right therefore, don't vote with the us of the security council. as i mentioned, it never, never fits in adjustment on any countries, aggression, a case in the country has never condemned any military nation.

sorry and condemns package. it condensed focused on the use of terrorism as an instrument of state policy against india, against our guy miss time. because india, victim of that kind of use of terrorism. but certainly, india has demonstrated in morally judgment on the military actions of any bar that's never been part of indian diplomacy. do you think the united states for saw what was going on as it pulled out of afghanistan after its longest war in his defeat in afghanistan? that that's why it was boring weapons into ukraine. ahead of what putin says is a provoke provocation. and what nato in the u. n says, was his illegal invasion from the gartner tons defeated. he relational states was a watershed moment and it currently but

by doing the defensive and he tried to di what attention he made some important strategic miscalculation is just the way couldn't have made some sort of different calculations 1st. which calculation on the part of binding was that he could use the thread of sanctions to deter russia from in reading ukraine. problem is that the us true will use of sanctions as blanket instrumental sanctions by repeatedly slapping sanctions on russia for the past 8 years or so. so the object of preventing ratio from in meeting ukraine and failed miserably. and this calculation was not to take hooton's threat, often an invasion serious me by giving him the security

assurances they demanded security or trans than the us. and they don't want to turn ukraine into a front line launched by the russia, by, by deploying offensive weapons on new created inside almost 3 months or so, who didn't talk to, to guarantee it is wanting to ignored repeatedly. and there was also a bottomless combination. ma'am you on the, on, on the part of putting in international relations. you can, by mounting a critical liquid credit achievement objectives without the need to actually execute the threat. where you put a long term military against ukraine. we compare us to abandon its policy of native creek to russian borders. he woke up the world,

the dangers of natal expansionism commentators, even in the us. we can ask whether expanding nato russia borders and thereby prompted russia to re militarize was an american interest. in fact, as you know, the military build up on nuclear waters kept the us on the ropes with bite and wanting for dance on in the nation was coming is sort of suspending that threat. put in decided to execute that even though controlling the outcome of the warm once it was launched is literally impossible. so i think he could have achieved more at sustaining. that's right. this is sort of actually launching the nation. obviously, moscow appears to believe that their course of action is the right ones and risking all is the way forward in the united states thinks that the united states think

that there must be, even if it's perhaps risk nuclear war. the ability for ukraine to join nato. that's what the urban union also firmly believes. so, i mean, the point here is the rights of ukraine to be able to join nato at all costs. few believe fewer in nato believe that ukraine should be admitted to it's to intimately divide it highly corrupt this functional state in the eyes of many natal. and there was a chance of, of ukraine and we're being admitted to natal itself is sort of a screeching, fresh air security concerns. and the most concerns could have been addressed to the war after on russia is not being global challenger. the main loan

challenger is china, which is seeking to supply the us as the global hedges on us. as the u. s. has already said, sorry to interrupt them, but obviously the largest on 850000 soldiers in the russian army. but european union nations, including germany, ascending in masses of weapons now into ukraine. do you think they think in washington of nato headquarters in brussels at b, a u parliament in brussels, in strasburg, that ukraine can beat the red army as they pour in these weapons? if not, why would they pour in the weapons? the strategy is very clear now that they persuade not only containment to point all against russia. also trying to engineer understand, to point all against russia just the way they in sneered russian

in many poses and the congress done in a ministry quite minor in the 1980s by launching the biggest covert operation in history. now in addition to the high sanctions that have been boast on russia, they are lieutenants, least seeking to instead and trap. russia is similar liquid quagmire in ukraine by pouring huge with the sources by arming the resistance, the insurgency, they want to bleed russia. that's the strategy, or whether they succeeded not returning the strategy when it in fact binding has asked congress for an additional $6400000000.00

for a wide arms and other military id ukrainian forces. whether they are armed forces, the resistance forces, insurgents that says, carrying amount of money that biden is willing to warranty ukraine. those are certainly the figures being thrown around. hell in capitol hill when it comes to the budget then. so apart from all these countries in the global south using turning away from the dollar to get round, the sanctions and so on. why do you think politicians in the russian duma wanted their boot in to support the recognition of danielle skin to hands. her hand pushed putin, whoever's, he wanted it as well to act in this way. if you believe it, sir, you appear to believe it's a catastrophic geopolitical mistake, that alone it's illegality under international law. well,

recognizing the 2 recovery of republics could have been seen as bardo. mounting, credible threat that could have posed the un and nato who concede what russia was asking back to actually launch an invasion. it was something completely different than tragic and walter moment of to they could get worse without caution and prudence on both sides. but why was it such a mistake? is this a low cost strategy? but it's very clear for us what the military objectives are in relation to ukraine. what he is seeking the chief, because, as you can see from the lines of attacks, there are 3 lines of attack that russia has mounted in ukraine. it

starts thinking to occupy the entire country. what are the military objectives of it from a difficult to guess? he's certainly not to do an example of ukraine and this in terms of the military operations so far. but my biggest concern is this. as a history of this city alone illustrates, foreign military invasions have decent life sovereign states. and as there are syria, libya and damage. such innovations have triggered, unending wireless and bloodshed and russia as invasion, and the u. s. plan to arm ukraine's to bleed russia threatened to turn your credit into assyria on libya. this will have made implications both for russia security as well as well. europe and security professor brown with jamie. thank you

so much. that's a for the show will be back on saturday. 76. he has to the day since then. you k bryant is to winston churchill address the u. s. making his round on good and speech where he warned against the spread of soviet communism. until then keep in touch my role at social media that has know which country you think is the biggest aggressive ah, with industry to restock and just look up from when i'm not only a muscle around noon noon, she kitty doesn't being in the green show on a nurse to me. yes, but i seal mama cook gas. gosh cisco to suddenly tim cut that to his ashley of dc. wanted to work with one of the cool

position admitted can you put me out and i put the key for the chino grimes to network for phones or something like that. and then we got that voice id that might be worth it. i had a little grain, lisa have that brush, a special military operation in ukraine has changed the world in many ways. it is forcing the u. s. in its allies to we think and reassess global security. we should not be surprised by this. after all, the post cold war era is over, what will replace it is still open to question a when i was just seemed wrong when i just don't a whole new world. yes, to see a,

an engagement. it was the trail. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. the point obviously is too late truck rather than fear a very job with artificial intelligence. real, somebody with a robot must protect its own existence. with

a russian delegation, arrived for a 2nd round of p thinking station with ukraine set to take place on thursday. today, 7 of russia's mitra operation in ukraine. moscow confound that, a tax television tower in key. russia also claims to have taken control of the southern states. hassan, but the premium is fine. the financing is still ongoing. and on the other side of the conflict heretic destruction of poems in the aftermath of the ban. so in the don't boss region where the wounded including children require medical, it will be but it's not very scary, but i'm afraid my room is near the basement and there is a whole right there. and the you politicians demand even harsher sanctions against moscow on to the.