ah, ah ah, ah hello in welcome to cross talk. we're all things considered. i'm peter lavelle since the start of russia's military operation in ukraine. the west has talked at russia and russians crushes side of the story is essentially absent and intentionally. so on this edition of the program, we talk with 2 pre eminent russian scholars about their own country. and ukraine, ah, discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess,

dmitri so sloppy is the deputy director of the central for comprehensive european international studies at the higher school or beacon, omics. and we also have maxine sutkowski, he is the director of the center for advanced american studies at moscow. the institute of international relations are gentleman cross that rules and the fact that means you can jump in anytime you want. and i always appreciate or i will start out with maxine, you know, maxime, the last few weeks have been tumultuous in so many different ways. and i was a educated as an academic historian of modern european history. and i used to teach how the per se of the per sy system failed and gave us the 2nd world war. and now i look at the system that was made primarily exclusively, actually by the west of the, in the post cold war order. that order has failed and institutionally, it's failed, ideologically. it's failed. and so where do we go from here? because institutions, at least the way i look at it because of the russia are into letters, go ahead,

max will remember, in late 90 eighties and early 9090 is frances fukuyama wrote his famous at the end of history essay. and i think what we're observing now is yet another end of the end of history, in the sense that, you know, back in the day the argument was that the world kind of found it's ideal framework for development liberal democracy market economy. what struck me over the past week, and that brought me to think that we are now seeing the end of the end of history. that the, the 3 countries, the united states turn to, to seek to undermine russian going to group on energy markets and on the world. we're iran, saudi arabia and venezuela. i think the end though, they're all great partners of the russian federation. but for years the united states have sanctioned them and blamed this how it is in particular for human rights violations and all that stuff. but right now it appears that you know,

that the bad is called good when the worst happens according to the us logic. but i think it's sense the signal to the rest of the world that there is no such thing is what, what value base foreign policy. and what we're seeing is interest based foreign policy. and it will be in this particular conflict, will be settled on interest based solutions either for war or through balance of interests. me to you. so, you know, one of the things i find very interesting is that when you look at the cold war in the, in the post cold war order that ended, in my opinion on february 24th. you know, it is a system that had a hedge among the basically called the, the, to the terms and conditions of engagement. but now we're going back to great power politics the way it has always been in history. i think the know that it was the, the cold war and the post cold war order. they were anomalies in history and, and i think that, you know, a citizenry doesn't understand that most of academia is politically driven. we're

back a great power politics. go ahead. oh, i think that we're witnessing the with the local to international relations and certainly of the periods which began with the soviet union is now over a abnormal period in the history of international relations. well, the united states with allies try to universalize a value system. so serious of institutions and establish basically if you more system, worldwide now it's or it's clear, the american foreign policy is changing really drastically. and i also witnessed the end, or at least of course, a significant force in the value based off of the, of the united states. this is

a certain continuation of the trend which began with will probably continue with your why them will do united states. and it expands the system of u. s. a. u. s. live alliances will be actually canceled also of forceful regime change in the other congress. i also see limits to the u. s. power to the u. s. ability to lead and to act as a level of hedge more because the level of huge amounts they produce global public goods. and they offer something good, something positive to the congress that they would want to engage in their system. what does the united states offer now? to congress, the washington wants to support the us and to contain russia. what does the united states over 2 countries like china, india, brazil,

except for threats, except for black male in the threats of new thank since the sanctions nothing. it means that, you know, the united states, of course remains a leader and the kitchen wall, but for a very limited number of countries, especially in europe, in some countries in asia. but as for the rest of the world, we're really watching the birth over new international system over new era in the development of the international system, with much greater pluralism ever since with much greater independence in terms of the posters. a institutions, you know,

you know, we've mentioned the end of history here and i'm kind of, i'm kind of curious how we got here. so it might seem, it's the end, it's the end of whose history i think it's the end of the west narrative about international politics. kind of agreeing with dimitry because, you know, it's, there was always this attempt to graft on russia making part of the, the, the, his see that the, the west believed in itself. and then this attempt also to deal with china and we've, we've seen obviously they doesn't work. i mean, russia very forcefully is balked at that. okay. and the chinese are watching very, very carefully. they're watching how the end of ones there's what's the new, one part of the world's history, and now we have the start of another world's part of history. i think that, you know, we're seeing the end of something and then the beginning of something. go ahead. why don't disagree with that and to talk and then you know, speaking of china, i think there is a really interesting concept that's giving direction right now is what the chinese

are now trying to substitute the concept of the soft power. no coined by joseph 9 and early 9090 and that was dominating the i r theory for for a long while. they're now trying to promote their own concept of the so called discourse power. so basically they say, you know, there is, doesn't really matter what types of soft power tools you have. what matters is that you said the narrative that you set up the discourse. and that was going to matter right now. and i think we're observing a lot of over the crisis in ukraine, you know, they've got the battle of narratives and the one actually, you know, both the united states and russia are in the way speaking to their own audiences. you know, that's why there is this wide spread argument that rushes one go losing the information where it is losing the information. we're in the western audience. well, at least the, you know, as, as we see here, but we are doing quite well according to americans own estimates in the,

in the rest of the world. and, you know, you know, russian narrative gets picked up in india and china in other countries. and that, i think also is quite different from what we've seen over the past few years. and they know, coupled with these well what, what will appears to be did further detail arise ation of the global global enemy. you know, on that the, the, a lot of people in there now, mean, you know, the sanctions on the, in the russian all adverse which in my view we're doing a lot of favorite touch of the russian economy, frankly, bought a lot of people and typhoons. all over the world are watching this, careful and thinking, well maybe we shouldn't be investing all that much in the west that you know, even one day our assets will be free. so just like that. so has been, is way, well, what happened? did their goals? ok, exactly. ok. it, it limit with change gears a little bit or,

i mean we talking about control of discourses and narratives here. but to me 3, it's very coercive to quote unquote, western values because to control the discourse or control the narrative, you resort the censorship. i mean, that's what we have gotten here. i mean, if you do not get on board with the official narrative, your n b, i mean it's not like, oh he just or she disagrees. no, there is a moral value put on it. you are a traitor and i, and that's very terrifying because that is in complete juxtaposition to what the western tradition is all about. so i would say by a, using these are narratives in a very forced way. but it's a very cool course of um, outcome on the values that you claim to uphold. go ahead to me. well, i think that we are viewing a combination of factors on the one hand, of course, the west remains dominant in the global narrative makes

a western narrative continues to prevail in the global system. this is why we see such a great informational war against russia. actually, information is one of the few elements of power where west some of them are still maximum. but all the other hand, i completely agree of the use of usage of this narrative. actually, accusations of the congress that do not want to cite with the west and remain either neutral or friendly towards russia, increases the gap between the west of the rest. and one of the most prevailing and dominant them says in international relations nowadays, is the acceleration of this gap, right? we are on the one hand, of course the west continues to the collective west continues to,

you know, to come together to go solidly and consolidation of the west consolidation of the prominent allies and powers together with the united states congress like germany, japan and so on. this is indeed one of the most important elements of international relations nowadays, but on the other can get this. will this consolidate the west of the majority of international relations? because huge, right? and this includes china, this includes india, brazil, the overwhelming majority of the african countries, including south africa, bricks conference, altogether, that includes the overwhelming majority of the countries in the middle east and latin america. so the west consolidates but kind of isolated from the

prevailing majority in the world and the more yourself, the western black male is informational narrative. the usage of economic instruments such a center of the wider is the gap. so yes, the waste remains immensely important. of course, the west remains to produce so many trans. i am the informational narrative, but the role of lays on the world right in all the west and the world are, remains arranged. narrow consolidation is a pirate. big are gentlemen, we're going to go to a short break. and after that short break, we'll continue our discussion on some real new stay. ah, ah

ah, ah ah ah ah. the welcome at the cross top,

where all things are considered and peter, well this is the home edition remind you were discussing some real news. ah, ah ok, right before the break, actually one of the jumping, i can see your lifting, your figure finger go right ahead. well, i'll just going to say that the, the lines are actually a little more blurred these days than just, you know, say that the russia and west and the rest because inside rush, other lot of people who are sympathizing with western western agenda and in the west there are a lot of people who are sympathizing with the russian agenda. you know, i've had, i've, i've spoken to a colleague in dawn bass a with a few a few days ago. and he remarked something very important that struck me. he saddle, we're seeing a lot of russians are seeing the, their story that the russians or what's happening in the prey. and this is striking to us because we've been dying for 8 years for the right to be called the russians

. you know, we, we see this as striking, a striking difference even within society. so i think where we're seeing a lot of this fractures inside these groups, you know, the less than the ref. well, we're always with this kind of complex, there's going to be even within society is going to be a lot of differences, which is at the end of the day help me. ok, but it's painful as well. i mean, when i enter a ministry law for minister law, a r t, very interesting interview a few days ago. and actually i have to say, i really enjoyed it because he basically said the russians relations of the west to come to an end or a, a, a free. so to put it that way. and it's really up to the west to approach russia if it wants to have a relationship to the outside world. that it seems almost absurd. but if you look at the context in this, everything is context. it does make sense. russia tried to play by the rules,

the rules kept changing. russia agreed to things and then agreements change. and so what's the whole point? we saw this from december of last year, all the way up to february 24th. you gentlemen. so all of these are prime ministers and presidents, foreign minister, all coming to moscow for all for now, because they weren't willing to listen, they weren't willing to negotiate. and that's now we've gotten to where we are now . go ahead. well, peter, i fully agree with this and get a sense of the whole paradigm of the whole body of russian west relations, or which, which existed over the last 30 years is know that and we are viewing more just political relations. but all the comprehensive system of links and interactions being just burned out, which includes economic relations, a humanitarian relations tourism. cultural educational ties, ever for me personally, you know, i was born in st. petersburg, and for me,

a very indicative moment was when finland decided to cancel the food relations between 2 and petersburg. these brought relations were established in 1953 with the city of lang and ground and nothing later, you know, including the od green, you know, soviet invasion interrupted or nothing preventive. the continuation of those brother who relations but today decided to cancel them. so all the body of relations is now burned down in these the very paradigm of russian and directions with the west is or which was the paradigm of russia, of west centers i, in russian foreign balls. russia really rise to establish something common european security system. and many other things with the western europe, you know,

in mind in mind is not the price to integrate into the western system. it failed. after that, russia has been trying to establish some sort of you some sort of arrangement and agreement on the rules of the game between russia and europe. it also failed. and ultimately, russia was compelled, you know, to ensure its interests unilaterally with the, with the use of military force. so this previous paradigm with russia rise to find some models. the band is some a commendation with the wes, this or we are at the 0 point. what come comes next? actually div depends on the, on the west and the major alternatives of this. alternative number one. we come from this 0 and the stablish some peaceful coexistence model with very limited amount of interactions with very limited agenda,

but still very important. and so just a confliction, you know, managing arms, race, arms, control, observation of some elements of interaction and human relations come back to normal . so when it comes to tourism and other elements, this is one of those which is of course much more preferable. the other alternative, if the west decides to continue both the war against russia, even y'all's, the end of the military conflict in your credit or no, no sanctions i've been repealed, or at least if there's still a huge political attempts to complain. russia to isolate process, to destroy the russian calling me in the end of a war in your grave, then it is another read. it is the paradigm of the continuation of war through more

legal means. and then unfortunately, we will ultimately face for escalation. let's see if we take the, the 2 paradigms, the 2, the 2 options that we just heard. it seems to me, there is a continuation from the end of the cold war to the present. and then ultimately it is forced bridging change and russian. i think it's going to be number 2. well that we'd, what we just heard is that there's, but this is all part of the continuum. and this is war. it's see, this is one of the things i think we, i think that the populations, particularly in the west, they don't understand that word anymore. war with russia. the west is at war with russia right now. we don't want to use that word because everyone thinks that i'm looking for more. but we're all, we're up to that point. and this is an economic war and information war. now cutting civil society con everything. ok, i don't see why it's going to,

they won't stop. i mean, there has to be in, in a gemini, doesn't appreciate barriers it will resist and continue your thoughts. well, i agree, i'll just draw your attention to, to import in my view things one is, remember the war in syria and all the massive information pressure campaign on russia that you know, that virtually hold it of this policy of regime change in the, in the middle east, the past week president assad, travel to the united arab emirates for the 1st time. which, you know, i think, is remarkable progress in, you know, how russia sees things in the middle east in particular. and, you know, in kind of, in defiance of all the western policies over the past few years. and the 2nd thing is anyone still talking about the think of the political interference that is

dominated us russian relations over the past 4 or 4 years. you know, that the, the crisis in ukraine makes it look like it's a totally normal tool, a foreign policy. and we remember that a lot of things were slipped on russia for political interference. you know, and russia spoke about, you know, america's interference now and remember like, oh, huge of in a big of a deal that was, you know, that the russian political interference, all kind of stuff. now all of that is throwing under the bus because there are other, more important things on you're talking about rushing. yeah, exactly, exactly. right. so what i, what i'm trying to say with this is they're big things to dominate rush west relations. and, but you know, what we're seeing now is really a reality check of all the things like what's, what's really, what's really important. and i think some new type of relations will emerge from,

from, from that. the key moment to me. whether the west would be willing to come to terms that russia is, is, is in, well, italy, what quote appear. power competitor is how much the west will a will get heard with these policies and conversations and other things it is doing not russia is one of the work itself is doing. and, you know, i mean, you can easily imagine how the quote unquote regime change in russia will, will, will, will, will happen a lot later than the quote unquote regime change in united states. it's such an interesting point that the, you know, the us and its allies have a very long history of sanctioning countries that basically cannot defend themselves. ok, now they can't defend themselves militarily. they can't defend themselves economically. and that we have a g 20 country that is being fully assaulted. and the fact that it is an important

country and the international system in every sense of the word there's going to be blow back against the west. i mean, you can, you can contact panama and it's not going to change the future of the western hemisphere. ok, but when there is a breach like this on this, of this scale, the blow back is almost, it's almost impossible to determine at this point. it will ricochet per year. we'll see, go ahead, jump in. well here i think that this is precisely one of the major factors why peaceful existence model might prevail in russia. western relations after the end of the war, a continuation of total economic war attempts to isolate russia. medical it will backfire, they to start to back far. you know, the, the west has completely exhausted the potential for those thanks of the lord back. right. the west is now why the instrument such as great

war, you know, i, a cancellation of russia's most favored nation status in trade which boise global economic go and switch, destroy the w jo global economy and destroyed the dominance of the 2 s dollar in global finance so on the one he, i'm the united states for instance, clearly supports the continuation of war in ukraine and prevents a weak political resolution to be achieved all the other hands. the continuation of war means innumerable, number of refugees, which are called in 1000000 small in a, in hundreds of thousands, which is an enormous pressure on the western economists, the destruction of the global economy might result into hunger, not just the, the deficit of 4, but fewer hunger in many african countries which are dependent on the import. so

we've done so it means also enormous integration into the west european competence. right. and they need to think about this. so in order to remedy and to manage those challenges, they must come to the new terms of relations with russia. of course, the paradigm relations will continue to be confrontational, but peaceful coexistence in the previous school was also a part of buffalo because we have run out of time, gentlemen, but i always tell western policy makers, be careful what you wish for. that's all the time we have gentlemen, i think my guess here in mosque, i want to thank our viewers for watching us here at r t c. next time. remember across ah, ah, look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a

robot, most of the baby orders given by human beings, except we're such orders that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful, official intelligence. and the point obviously is to great trust rather than fear a job with artificial intelligence. real, somebody with a robot, let's protect its own existence with ah, wasn't a century ago marked when remarked that god created war so that americans would learn geography. and few us officials have done more to put that into practice than my guess today. former us national security adviser and former us ambassador to the

united nations john bolt and has supported all recent american lab wars. the piece . absolutely appalled by russia's actions in ukraine. why is that? ah ah, a with i'm option or as you know, what you're doing on the ground for the final show in the studio, in 19 years to the eve of an invasion of iraq by the u. s. u. k, australia and poland. that would arguably capitalize the killing, wounding,

or displacing of tens of millions all around the world was of course, george w. bush, a secretary of state, colin powell who held a vial at the un security council to make the flawed case for war in iraq. and was the world today teaches on the edge of a global conflict that could be even more deadly than iraq. afghanistan, libya or syria and join are from falls church, virginia by pals, former chief of staff, colonel larry wilkerson retired colonel wilkinson. thank you so much for coming back on the show. just stay in the past few days. i think one reporter said to jen saki, the press secretary for the white house. why are you sending in shotguns, pistols, a grenade launchers and the like to the ukrainian people as defensive weapons. what do you make of the massive amounts of arms on top of the ones give.