a constitution, if you will, finally, you'll, and they told me that roger interest a threat. right? so luckily, if it's getting late, so this very, very important, why many times a year i saw many chinese russia have to buy the west for a long time. and i have to find that this is why in china nowadays, many, many people a class. and it's a point where the, i know from the articles that many in china also sympathize very strongly with the people of ukraine and they're suffering. and i have to say that many russians are 2

very, very greatly upon by that. but you want to describe ukraine as having the body of a strong man and the fate of a servant girl and gender insensitive politically incorrect. it may sound to western air. i think it's hard to deny, given how poorly ukraine has been able to benefit from both this strategic position and it's natural resources and i think to some of them it's very similar to i've got a son because i've got a son essentially located in a region continent it has very which resources but all and i did it more harm than good fall. this died both in the case of agreement perhaps even in the case a from janice then with a s. there are a lot of a tragedy in those middle sized countries. or small side. so you me

a quick call just to why i called the you are still on the phone. yes. those countries, a medium size or small size cannot be out of the countries in may 20 because it has a policy. so you're going back to, to be a breach between the asians, but i'm not going to go there and need to now a tool for us to, for you. all right, so i think nowadays with a wall with all the coffee,

so i'm there to be a, maybe a coffee you may become the police and then worse country. now, you said before that the essential believe that russia was pushed into this military operation by native continuing encroachments not going to put in whole authorized this operation. his last visit brought wants to china, and it was very interesting in my visit because there were some delegation of food in, in the morning. they had a full of meetings and a lot in the evening. and there must have been something very, very important in those personal meetings to justify, you know, travelling such large distances for such a short period of time. do you think the chinese were informed of the russian intentions to launch this operation? i know that there is no way of knowing it, or sure,

perhaps only because she enters and couldn't know that. but what's your intuition on that? now with a right, i mean there, there were some important talks behind the scenes with a e, i a to a lot of china issues. and i need an answer whether that time a mission to try. but now i'm very concerned a bench with the fact that, you know, a very, very obvious answer is that

a complete, a few didn't not after the chinese embassy you to why so least approved at, at to china. no, to choose so good. there are people complain about it. why do you need a hand? we understand it because we believe that the child, we believe that a country and has a lot to do to watch. now, despite this, i'm beginning on whether or not china was informed about russia's intention. i think we would agree that even before this military operation, the relationship between russia and china was growing closer over the last couple of months. i think be a became even tighter and the chinese side is still trying to project

a neutral line, you know, projecting that neutral line in and of itself is a sign of independence. it's not citing explicitly with, with the american head jam. and do you think that is intentional? so i'm a follow the u. s. to session watch to session the past. now do you know, was a country population, not a washer or was i believe a washer in china? you can not. so any progress, but we'll only ha, all a china has always a post american feature, but we have a lot of country,

a treaty or a doctor, one for now. the active fighting is still contain to ukraine and we'll hope that it will stay that way. although the ripple effects from this confrontation already south around to well, what could possibly make because still it is to press further and try and the military operation from a local, regional one into a global outbreak of violence. a very interesting you called a, b a,

a c, a, b, a b, or a party. so now if we try, we want to, we put a $2.00 and $2.00. are you in chapter a, a can come from p a. so yes. now you mentioned a prison she and he was also talking about humanity being the one big ship and having to face crashing waves together. he said that throwing anyone overboard

would present a major problem for you know, everybody. but i need to meet very chinese matter for i do think the americans who are clearly in turned on thinking rush, i mean, they're not hiding it. they want to, you know, push russia under. what do you think they're likely you know, to listen to your perceive that you from china? well, with that being on the same shit and now man a . now do you know why a little

a staff and so now that a, so now we need to be done as to why, man, not just the whole family, just all their own countries. you know, you can't even imagine the whole universe are small and you know, 100 or where and our country in the u. s. a. and a united the address. so if a history ok, well i was around, we have to take a very short break right now, but a little bit back in just a few moments. ah,

a ah needs to come to the russian state total narrative. i've stayed as i'm turning the most. i'm skiing with 55 with speedy one else with will ban in the european union. the kremlin media machine estate on russia today and split ortiz spoke neck, given our video agency, roughly all bands on youtube and pinterest. and with

this forward to talking to you all, that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders at conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence and the point obviously is to place trust, rather than fear i would like to take on various job with artificial intelligence, real summoning with a robot must protect its own existence with a

ah, welcome back to the park with when, when executive dean of the chung institute for financial studies, i don't care when you are very serious scholar. but in one of your articles, speaking about this and growing danger of a global war on, you mentioned that curious sense i would say graham and numerical kinds, adams that this some of every 2 digits of the starting date of 128th of july 1914 what's you and the 1st of september 1939 and the russian ukrainian conflict 24th of february of 2022 are they said they all

go down to number 5. and i know the traditional chinese philosophy assigns a lot of significance to numer ology, but i wonder if your sound see any meaning in this kia incidence. a major history or history, there can be a use of all the records in the future. and all these numbers a danger of the office. so if that is continues the whole is not a p, a p, a prefer wall in the

district. so now this is a lot like to put a wall. first of all, i think just a better way to, to start a war. now, if i'm not mistaken, there's another kind of saying that suggests that the best war is the war enough for us. and obviously, the chinese trying to navigate that relationship with the united states, the best they can. you wrote your sound that for now at least you have been able to avoid, you know, falling into a cold war trap. do you think that is still a danger when it comes to the united states and china, or do you think that conflict with russia? you know, this indirect conflict with russia so far will keep washington b. a for

a couple of years ago with neat actions being avoided. if a extension or a is all you know, try to join the so however earlier this, if you start history a, so now they pad and the best way to, to mandy is to start the why i ask more too many or actions and the why fi who did not die, and maybe i, i'm very aware that the chinese, i don't like the comparison of the ukrainian situation to,

that's all i want because of beijing insistence on the one china policy. but i'm sure, you know, the president might, in the biden administration on the other administrations, to have promised her support for, for k u, how ukraine was treated by the american security wise. the fact that they have essentially been, you know, abandoned in the time of great need. do you think those promises of american support are worth anything? yeah. a trying to for all, you know, we all agree. we see a lot of they think the u. s. you've agreed to badness law and we can look

at that time. and this is very, very, a very small way. and they think it easier to see. can you the same way to badness? chinese, we can walk and we can find a lot. you are here. it is very f u r c a r a s they verify the last all you. so how long it got it a state to contain to why i thought that a, so me a now us thinking about ukraine, it's well known that the ukraine is one of the world's leading exports of agricultural goods. and as he rode recently more than 14 countries, i'm more than 25 percent dependent on the ukranian with increased. i'm sure the

russians are he aware of that own responsibility before the 30 countries. they do, especially those who are dependent on the ukraine and experience. but do you think, realistically, it is now within russia ability to ensure that the spring sewing season begins as it should and that it continues as it should so that to minimize the burden on the rest of the world. because in addition to this war, we also have, you know, many seasons of drought, locust, and asians, and many other factors that are affecting the production of food. so actually a china or especially a lot of their widely,

i mean a and also a 2 or people. so now the whole world is to watch the wall. it's a code and i t a shortage awful. so we have 2 of the other countries, washington, for now at least seems to believe that in penalizing russia, you know, any means to justify the goal. and, you know, it already led to,

steve increases in commodity prices for many companies to alter action change. do you think that the world is likely to take it as it is? you know, the mind is always right. or do you think it may provoke some counter reaction from other countries to make the americans to force the americans to understand that, you know, it's not again to force others to carry the burden of their decision. they may take whatever action necessary as the russian out, you know, forcing other countries to, to do the same or more and more people, a, b, a. or you can move it all through the feed. it's a, a t in country

all injury to this countries a command. ok? so i, we all b a, a will not a look to run. i think you would agree that many countries, i mean, i've heard it from a lot of my guess from around the world. they all believe that the americans have demonstrated selfish behavior. but up until recently, very few countries have any diplomatic or economic, or even political force to resist that behavior. do you think that meant to maybe building something more productive? right now, for example, i know there are lots of talks about china and saudi arabia, you know, an old american ally, switching to are you on denominated trade in oil. do you think, you know,

such indirect moves? can i not even challenge them can had gemini sent about challenging then american hegemony, but making the world more balanced and more secure? a sort of saying no to depend on the will of one country a coffee with a speech. you're actually the common with a so we are very correct. so every come to see that, you know, you know, after we try to draw the, now, you know, you see, you saw it. do we need to trust that argument. so here we can

see more and more countries about the example the united states. i thought your thought a monetary with these are now in your page 258. so in the future. so in fact, i think a thought is coming to an end. and as we see the rising prominence of china and other countries, including that currency as well. and you know, one of the is sort of a good question to one of the expressions we hear a lot. and the international, the scores is who is on the right side of history and who is on the wrong side of history, which i have to say is a very western, i would even say a very christian concept and, you know, dividing everything in stark, lee,

good or bad friends, as china continues, it's natural, iraq to prominence. do you think it will introduce a more complex understanding of what is good or what is that? and what is the balance between, you know, various opposites. a wall be how you don't mind and not so much tension a american countries a all but a few a so for example, e a u. s. a less but the need a not a presence. i think though the american me

sure i d e a n a b a u. so that's why i think we need to reach a, a well doctor, why do we have to leave it here? thank you very much for your insights today. thank you. thank you. so much and thank you for watching hope to see you again on world apart. ah, a

ah ah, since the break away but don't it's people's republic won't been ranging and don't bath. ukrainian artillery has been shelling civilian towns in mining villages that your more very lovely deal with what i do wanna work with one of your company a little above the whole of the city of flow boss will give us bullet one. 0 is your media a reflection of reality in

the world transformed what will make you feel safer? high selection for community. are you going the right way or are you being led somewhere? direct. what is true? was his faith in the world corrupted. you need to descend a join us in the depths or remain in the shallows. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race is on offense, bearing dramatic development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful,

very difficult. time. time to sit down and talk lou in each to come to russian state to never. i've stayed as i'm phone and ignore santini diversity. i'm not getting something up for a group in the city that would be okay. so mine is gonna be the one else with we will van in the european union, the kremlin. yup, machines. the state aren't russia today and spoke r t spoke neck, even our video agency, roughly all band on youtube and pinterest, and with

me, ah li. neither, whoa is multiple love with multi level institutions. they you and she called for multiple r a t in their world during his 1st visit to russia. since the conflict began, the rate of the trip itself out seeing the secretary general facing criticism from western countries for simply talking to multiple also on the program. germany long says it will after all provide care with anti aircraft tanks. while the u. k. is armed forces, ministers say ukraine should be able to target russian territory and can do so with nachos weapons. also ahead once again found a huge variety of different mines grading.