ah, ah, ah ah ah, beijing proposes an expansion of the brakes alliance with argentina, understood to be the top continent to join brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa royce, as president joins his turkish counterpart and oppose in finland, unsweetened the session to nato u. s. congress passed as a $40000000000.00 aid package for ukraine. the 1st such package that doesn't forbid the supply of weapons to the nut. also coming up on the program, large a holy are justified and brutal invasion of iraq. i mean, the ukraine,

former us president george w bush, you ordered the 2003 invasion of iraq gaffes while speaking about the crisis and ukraine with, from moscow to the world. this is our scenes national. i'm peter scott. and these, the top stories this, our briggs group of countries spending more than 40 percent of the world's population is expected to welcome new members us at the chinese proposed opening the doors of the alliance. china proposes to start the bricks expansion process, explore the criteria and procedures for the expansion and gradually form a consensus. so far. the bricks group includes brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa which joined the alliance back in 20 turn. the box aim is to encourage economic, political and he also cooperation between the member states and the group is now

expected to start the procedure of inviting new members argentina, which was early invited to not clean bricks. meeting is believed to be the top candidate at the moment, meal candle, whether the members of brakes have back to the chinese proposal while pledging to discuss the matter further. during the latest breaks meeting, the chinese representative, also called on nato to negotiate with russia and ukraine, or condemning western attempts to isolate, to separate states or political consultant. patricia goosgo says the argentine is a long time ali of bricks countries. so the proposal is not surprising at all when there's a shaggy question, tina has many values and principles that are common with the bricks ideology. there have been discussions of argentina, bricks, member for many years. now the world is beginning to become more multi polar uses. hedge money has been breaking down for many years now. the situation of the world is more complicated than before. with such countries as china, russian, india,

our economies collaborate significantly. now, argentina has been asked to integrate more intensely with this organization. and these developing countries, we can now cross lives, the chief editor of independent news websites oper, monday bremo ultimate brenner welcome to the program. and you know, how would you assess overall the importance of bricks, expansion globally? is it an influential alliance in your, in your view? breaks is asked in the mental institution they think for building a move to paula order. the way for developing counter is to break free from the institution such as the international monetary fund and the wall or the bank controlled by united states and the recipient union. brick expansion can help developing cat nations for so that currently depends on the dollar base. it

financing fears quit. that's my idea about now as we just mentioned, argentina is believed to be the front runner. it's become the next member of the briggs alliance as talks on it's a session i've been going on for years now. what do you think are it's chances of finally becoming a member of briggs? i think we have a really good chance is i think that brazil, if lula is elected president in october, i think that brazil should be in favor. i think that russia would have no problem with adding kina, integration to the brakes, and adults, i don't know, see why south africa would be county the most delicate issue, i think would be the acceptance of india politically. closer to the u. s. a interest and political management, i think i had some a worry about in yet,

nor to brazil after brazil elections and norco, russia. i think we'll have to wait and see how that plays out. but what do you think it's taken so long to broaden the alliance and add new members to it, or even talk about it? let's say we're talking about gigantic countries with their own problems and agendas. and we need to understand that the brakes is a kind of international alliance that worked by consensus. so it is low to build consensus with managed decisions, including the expansion of the brakes that we it's, it's, we have to understand that an alliance as the brakes walked. a step by step is not a very difficult to arrive to some

of the season in a fast track. i think that consensus is low and we have to understand that. mm hm. and if argentina weren't in the run in what will the prospective candidates do you think would be in the pipeline to join bricks on the counters? i think out think about iran and turkey. i think those 2 counties would be an important elias to the brakes because of their economic co importance in the world. and because they, they have natural alliance with the current members of the brakes for turkey, if it were to join, would also fund itself in quite an interesting position not dissimilar to india, as a nato member with also close ties to russia. yeah, it's true, but i think that the turkey has in the special situation. whoa, whoa, turkey is

a member of, of the, of the nature of po, 30 has a, has a long history in relationship with therapy in union and united states. i think that i think turkey in the last 10 years, he's looking for more independence, a place in the road. so i think that turkey could be a very important ally to the brakes. of course, we're talking about is low and we're not talking. i repeat, we're not talking about a fast track alliance, but i think that in their politico, the strategy, i think that to attract iran and turkey is very important to is trends the brakes in the current international situation. well,

that's unafraid. that's all we have time for. we wait and see how the bricks and the alliance develops over the next couple of years or so brenner ultimate. thank you very much for contributing to our team. say thank you. thank you. oh turkey is refusal to allow finland unsweetened to join nato as cause a ride, a widening rift within the block with a presence of croatia. now also speaking out against the session of the 2 nordic countries creation president, zora and milan of each one of his countries, parliament to vote against the proposed expansion of nato. so i think a legit grievances that western countries have failed to help. croatians resolve their political disputes with neighboring bosnia and herzegovina. none of it has also said that allowing philip unsweetened to join nato would be a quote, very dangerous adventure format. turkish military intelligence chiefs, as the u. s, is seeking to use nato to project his own agenda across the globe. move will move

soon, so i was your nato expansion isn't only happening in europe at the upcoming summit in madrid. the alliance will discuss its main issues and challenges, including russia, the u. s. ones, japan, south korea, australia, and new zealand to join the want to expand the blog to influence the whole world. if they manage to achieve that, the nato would immediately become a u. s. global weapon. that is extremely dangerous. if they carry on that strategy, it could spark world war 3. nato was expanding against russia and china. this process is like lighting a stick of dynamite. i consider this unacceptable. nato was established during the cold war, but the past is in the past while nato still exists. what is the purpose of nato to maintain peace or to perform as a hammer of the us? i think nato is now being used as a tool to help the u. s. achieve its own goals. we don't need nato expansion today

. the russian forces conducting their military operation in ukraine, do not pose any kind of threat to the west. the west is trying to use the situation for its own profit, regardless of the fact that people are dying there, the world should not be uni polar, a collective will is required. meanwhile, the turkish president has reiterated his stunts on preventing helsinki on stock home from entering the block. we do not want to make the same mistake twice, therefore we will decisively continue our policy. in this regard, we told our partners that we would say no to sweden and finland, nato membership. we will continue our path in the same direction. and tara claims that the 2 nordic countries support terrorist groups and movements opposed to the turkish government. diplomatic sources say that and kara has blocked the bureaucratic process of nato's expansion. i was just hours after fin in sweden 100 in the official applications, a form of turkish military intelligence chiefs,

as on car, is simply trying to protect its own national interests. dash include before the conflict between russia and ukraine, nato was not even considering the membership of sweden and finland. this whole issue is being promoted by the united states and the u. k. they want western countries to stand united against russia. turkey has 2 good reasons to be against this. the 1st is that it will lead to a conflict between russia and the west. and the 2nd, sweden and finland are providing strong support to terrorist groups. sweden helps the cars financially, but there are also other countries in nato that also support terrorism against turkey. and the united states is the 1st one to mentioned here. washington supports the kurds in their efforts to create a military strongholds or northern syria. therefore, in light of these significant security issues, turkey strongly opposes the entry of sweden and finland and to nato. if those

countries continue to support terrors, then why should turkey sit at the same table with them? being members of one security organization means that each members obligated to guarantee support and protection to others by supporting kurds, swedes and many other countries are putting turkey in a difficult position. in my opinion, turkey has the right to talk about its security guarantees. and until this important issue was resolved on turkey, should stand his ground. oh, alex, us, president george w bush, the instigator of the invasion of iraq, of course, a piece of accidentally admitted how and justified his actions were mistaken. iraq for ukraine. jonas speech in dallas. now a somehow suggested that that was purely bushes. conscience speaking, human rights watch has referred to it's as quote the freudian slip of the century, the decision of one man to launch a holy, unjustified, and brutal invasion of iraq. i mean of ukraine says

a rack. i mean, up the ukraine, iraq to anyway 75, i most used 2003 invasion of iraq cost approximately 200000 lives and ruined the countries economy for the buford. down to his age, we spoke with international law professor francis boyle, who participated in a trial in column for over legit war crimes committed by us troops in iraq on george w bush's orders and boil, says the deform u. s. presidents should be brought to justice. well, my son's me is so the audience saw laughing about it. and if you hear us mainstream new sweetie this morning, many pundits are laughing about. there is nothing funny about what happened here. this was an outcry, aggression on your berg crime against piece. despite to figure you all

put up there, as far as our investigations have been able to determine this war, killed about 1500000 iraqis outright jerasat and 5000 of us. so military personnel bush should be in jail. ah. and so king about america, the u. s. congress has approved a $40000000000.00 package to ukraine, and one's present bite and signs off on the bill. a fresh supply weapons will be heading to the country for more less. let's go live now to our teeth. caleb mall pin in new york. caleb, the bills approval raises the question of just how much more nato weaponry will be flowing into ukraine? away, exactly. it's going what can you tell us about the latest package? sure. well we have the u. s. congress moving ahead. this 40000000000 dollar package has been approved,

providing us aid to ukraine. now it's important to note that in previous aid packages the, i'd say it's a sent to ukraine. they specifically specified that the as our battalion, this openly nazi division of the granting and military could not get any weapons or support from the united states. this is the language that was previously in us aid packages to you grant. none of the funds made available by this act may be used to provide arms training or other assistance to dissolve battalion. now what's particularly disturbing is that this recent package does not include this language. it does not specify that the as a battalion cannot. ready receive assistance from the united states. what more it appears that weaponry from nate. dell has apparently ended up in the hands of the battalion already. you look at the as a battalions official, twitter,

they seem to be highlighting weapons like a matador. ready which is an anti tank weapon that has been among the weapons that nato has provided to you, great the peers, they may already be getting their hands on on us weapons at this point. and we also have us official saying they don't know where are these weapons they send ukraine, go on and know who ends up getting. this is what we've heard in terms of our ability to track the weapons that are going in. as you know, we don't have any forces on the ground, so that's it's difficult for us to do. i couldn't tell you where the weapons are in ukraine and whether the ukrainians are using them at this point. they're not telling us every round of ammunition they're firing and who and when. now it's important to know the united states is the top ex, border of weapons in the world, u. s. arms flow across the planet. there are many instances of us weapons ending up in the hands of problematic individual. when the usa withdrew from the adapt.

janice, dan, recently we saw the taliban get it hands on some u. s. high grade, military weapons i and hardware. and that was in the hands of the taliban. we've also seen in mexico drug cartels often armed with sophisticated u. s. military grade weaponry. so around the world, us weapons often do end up in the hands of problematic individuals and this new bill. it was just past the $40000000000.00 provide the ukraine does not have a stipulation that the battalion, this notorious neo nazi fighting division and ukraine, that they can't get their hands on on this weaponry. so this is something that many people around the. ready world are seriously concerned about is the usa continues to escalate its anti russian rhetoric. the united states continues to pour weapons into ukraine, who might be on the receiving end of some of these deadly weapons. caleb, thank you for being the latest on that us aid package to ukraine. us ortiz kill

more payment reporting live from new york. thank you. the roads on the capitol hill to prove the aid package came, despite opposition from some members of congress, one of whom accused fellow american law, makers of corruption and even like in the bill to a money laundering scheme. federal law makers fund non profits. they find non governmental organizations, they fund grants grants that go to people. and if you really look into it, a lot of times it's their friends and families that operate these non profits and non governmental organizations. and it's basically like money laundering schemes. earlier republican senate to run poll did manage to single handedly delay the legislation for several days. he also called on the us public to oppose the spending of $40000000000.00 of taxpayers. money on ukraine, us instead of helping americans, buckets home over the top of democratic senator chuck schumer, him backer, rumble even calling him a pullman report of the kremlin. i went home and i had a standing ovation from 200 people at a lincoln day dinner. who are say,

thank you for holding up this money. we need help at home. we can't get baby formula. we can't pour our gas, but it is repugnant that one member the other side, the junior senator from kentucky chose to make a show and obstruct ukraine funding, knowing full well, he couldn't actually stop its passage for senator paul to delay ukraine, funding from purely political motives is to only strengthen pollutants hand. and while the usaa administration gives up to send full $2000000000.00 to ukraine, many ordinary americans are struggling to cope with rising inflation at home. alone with gasoline place prices, which over a dollar a gallon just from last year. some locals are voicing their concerns about the u. s . government sending money abroad while hanging americans out to drive home stock market is crashing gas prices. arising, inflation is through the roof. must be time for another 40000000000 for ukraine. if our elected officials had to pay for their own gas, i bet they would find

a solution to the rising gas prices. meanwhile, back in our country, gas prices at highest level ever and rising. babies have no formula, store shelves, empty supply line crisis, southern border, a mess, highest inflation in decades. republican congressmen month gates has also slammed quote progressives in the u. s. government for their hypocrisy and funding the conflicts and ukraine. i used to be able to count on progressives in the congress who joined me in opposing a war in yemen who join me and pushing back against presidential war powers with iran who agreed that it would be crazy to start world war 3 over the kurds. on the issue of ukraine, the progressives are signed up for the $40000000000.00 plus to from the war. political on list garlan nixon believes us to sacrificing the well being of his own citizens to fuel conflicts abroad. now we see a tremendous amount of money. $40000000000.00 that will ostensibly go to ukraine,

but everyone knows that only a portion of the money will ever leave the american shores. a lot of it will go to defense contractors here or any number of contractors. and certainly when it gets there, there is it, there is a, certainly a number of people in the society who are connected to in ukraine, who are connected to oligarchy who are connected to organized crime. and all manner of mystery behavior shall we say. so we certainly know that money will be laundered . a lot of it will end up in cyprus and various bank accounts of politicians. our country is no, is not a a nation state. as we understand this in an empire, we've gone to the dying collapsing stage of an empire. so now the resources from the empire flow out all around the world to try to pop up the empire. so now the american people, rather than get the print b, unfortunately, to use this word,

the economic privilege of living in an empire that prays on everyone else. now they are the one who is pre owned by the empire. and the empower simply uses our resources and use the american people to prop up their, their endeavors around the world, such as the proxy war in ukraine. european parliament has urged the you to stop unprecedented sanctions on a former german chancellor, annex, austrian foreign minister. gerhard, schroeder and karen can, i still have been targeted over their close ties with moscow and if approved by brussels, the move would march the 1st you sanctions against such hope, high profile citizens at home. the european parliament is also called on e. u. countries take spun the sanctions further to include any european entrepreneurs. i'm politicians who still get money from russia and hold high posts in state companies that moreover the gym and been to stock has suspended privileges bestowed on former chancellor. gerhard schroeder, this comes is both good. schroeder and eggs, austrian minister of foreign affairs,

and can i saw on the board of directors of major russian energy company ross left for the politicians. also accused of having close personal relations with president vladimir putin. resources urge them to abandon their positions in the russian company, all faced sanctions, including the freezing of their assets in the u. we discussed the latest developments with our guest. i wish so. no compromise is long in the moment. no, really? because i think the sanctions anyway totally austin, mentoring, if you were leading sanctions usual sanction president by them was here and i was all around. this is a big question. if you to international national no, i didn't see this only because he has a rush on it. it's like

mistreating. every respect a says on the titian's. i think this is to los and i have totally unacceptable. a former chancellor of germany to be treated in such a way. i mean, rather did a good job for her for, for germany when he was a chancellor i, she did everything possible to resolve the energy problems of germany. and he is asked to pay for that because he does not agree with the policies of the german government. i mean, every person has the right to has his own to has to have his own opinion. these sanctions are to tell the truth. remind me a little bit of what was happening in germany in the 1900 thirty's. those who are

against those and not government, were slowly, slowly pushed away, ended up in jail without their assets. so i hope we're not returning back to that time. so if the e u is slowly becoming more and more undemocratic, and i think that we might end up, i hope not, of course, that even speaking against the e. u by e, you citizens would become a criminal offense. i hope we don't be sure that that state, amid a grave economic crisis in soaring inflation, the planet to consume less energy and an effort to secure independence from britain, oil and gas. the gulf reduction has grown from previously from its 9 percent to 13 percent. not according to the commission, president energy savings are the quickest and the cheapest way to address the

current energy crisis. we will therefore increase the energy efficiency target for 2030, from 9 percent to 13 percent. this is just one of the proposals under the new e u. v power plan introduced in an effort to reduce dependence on russian fossil fuels. now these promise to allocate an additional $300000000000.00 euros to achieve its goal, which will go towards importing more resources from other countries, cutting economic expenses, and a swifter transition to green energy. this is all happening amid exorbitant inflation, which is 3 times higher than the european bangs targets that's affects all european households, which have faced a growth in prices for goods transports and energy to save the country from economic collapse. german economists have even proposed delaying the retirement age by 7 years to 70 years old. forced energy transition is said to be one of the fighters contributing to economic instability,

which is already been exacerbated by a death of qualified employees and a lack of young people capable of financially supporting the elderly. we discussed the issue with economist or for michael hudson. he says that the use economy is shrinking is tied to becoming a u. s. satellites. it will be a squeeze economically. it was trying to be a power house in the world economy. but in the last month, the euro has been declining steadily against the dollar. and it's on the way to $1.00 per euro, because it's having to pay much more foreign exchange for energy, for food, for weapons, and it's shrinking in terms of other economy instead of putting its own interest. the 1st is putting a, really, the us interest 1st, and it's acting more like a satellite of the united states. the united states is a western europe is being left out. and russia,

china and your asia are going together with the rest of asia. and europe is simply going to be left behind. it's losing its export markets. it's being squeezed. europe is following the u. s. the directions not to have contact with russia and without contact with russia is not going to have contact with china. because china sees that europe is going to try to do to it just exactly what it's been doing to russia. and finally, after weeks of backlash, the u. s. government has suspended a plan to create the so called dis, information governance board, which was intended. so the spread of information throughout the country, the more it was put forth for a purpose, right? to make sure that we really did a really did address what was happening across the country. when it came to disinformation, it's going to pause. there's been a mis characterizations from outside outside forces. this is what's happening. there is a pause. we did not have an involvement and it's that all the critics condemned the

initiative. the dystopian ministry of truth questioning its effect on free speech along with the qualifications of the quote disinformation experts employed to watch over the country in the on call, which the intended 1st executive director received the most severe criticism with dozens of publications mocking her record as an expert in truth, while highlighting her tendency to ascribe everything unfavorable to the democrats, of the russian influence campaign, and not included in the hunter by the laptop which detailed his family's financial schemes in the u. s. under received, which was published during the 2020 election august adam ca cache a u. s. veteran on anti war out of his things to the very idea of fact checking by the government makes little sense given that they would only try to forward fox favorable the agenda. i'm grateful to be included in the conversation. as in iraq veteran who's been in that sense, a victim of massive government, this information campaign. and as someone who's been censored and shadow band is an

independent media bruce or an anti war activist, trying to draw attention to the lies that government tells pathological line behavior. setting up a new way of saying was the truth, that everybody else is why, you know all the comparisons of joints by george orwell. 984, the chair, need her, the history of spreading misinformation herself. but once encouraging about this is that government is gone in the united states, and i mean, governments all over the world do this to justify their existence obviously. but in the united states, they've gone so far as to create the ministry of truth as it's been referred to as the $984.00 reference. and it's so over the top they can't make it. there were fact checkers. does everybody go fact checkers? yeah, right. you your, your preferred fact because it's your truth and your agenda.