what is the joe by imposing these sanctions on russia has destroyed the american economy. so there's your boomerang such students that we engage in dialogue with all interested parties. this tool was playing quite some time ago. and jerry, we had very substantive and extended talks with president ted bone and foreign minister le memory. we have good ties in defense and industrial sectors and active cultural and humanitarian exchange. we also valued the resistance of the arab nations to the west and lead and their impartial assessment of the situation in ukraine. they don't join the sanctions regime against russia because they generally understand that the cause of the current events is the blatant refusal of all western colleagues to grow on equal and impartial security in our common region. my oman visit was the 1st one from so 10 heights has been carrick, l said as seated to the throne. he gave me a warm welcome. i spent

a lot of time with me. i really appreciated this from his majesty, as the mom protocol doesn't require interaction with ministerial level officials. in such form. the talks have demonstrated that we have a lot of potential for development, especially in trade and economy. we are able to take these ties to the level of our political dialogue and we have a lot of opportunities here, for example, in energy and i t. then on june, the 1st i will take part in the regular session of the foreign ministers forum of golf corporation council, russia and riot. this is the format that has been around for quite some time to to cove at 19. there was a pause in our meetings. now our friends have suggested we resumed the practice. in addition to the gcc russia forum, we will also have bilateral meetings with almost all members of the organization. all arab nations have adopted an sheet of responsibility. they've proven that they always act in a way that best serves their national interests, and that they wouldn't find these interests for the sake of someone else's to

political schemes. overall, our relations are based on mutual respect, respect the fundamental interests of the arab countries, and we take that security concerns seriously. they in turn recognize threats to russia, security. the threats that the collective west has been engineering for decades, right to our borders, trying to use ukraine to contain russia and inflict serious damage on our country to a cut we do, do you believe they are ready to continue with us policy despite the western pressure the anglo saxon airlines, as we call it low, was douglas knoxville. yes, the anglo saxon alliance has infinite cool, and they show it daily. the west doesn't honor its obligations under the un charter to respect the sovereign equality of states and abstained from interfering in their internal affairs. instead, it keep sending it some bastard as an emissaries to arab nations and every other capital of the world, to bluntly blackmail and deliver ultimatums. it also uses certain situations in its blackmailing efforts and directly threatened,

so the party of punishment you're saying they will regret not joining the sanctions against russia. this is outright disrespect of sovereign nations, but by the reaction of the arab nations and most of the states in asia, africa, and latin america, we see that they don't want to sacrifice their national pride and be lucky to the senior partners. because it only shows that the colonial state of mind and habits of our western colleagues had never changed. the u. s. in europe is still thinking along those lines, each in their own historical styles. they think they can impose their will on others. this isn't right and it's deplorable. it goes against the historical process of forming a multi polar world with several centers of economic growth, financial power, and political influence. there's no doubt the india and china at the world's most fast growing economies with a lot of influence. just like brazil and other latin american countries, the colonialists repressed the potential of africa that lies in its immense amounts of natural resources. they are still repressing in the neo colonial age. that hasn't ended yet so, or is raising its voice too much new. i'm positive,

the arab middle east is one of the pillars of the emerging multi polar world. we give him russia, china, india, and other nations have friendly relations. could we see in the lines of those nations to oppose the u. s. blog. when you go to the survey, we never found that alliances will buddied up against anybody. then we have an extensive, well established network of partner organizations. so these are the structures created after the collapse of the soviet union. what the commonwealth of independent states, the collective security, treat your organization and the, your asian economic unions are. there are also organisations that bring together plays across a great geopolitical landscape, such as the shanghai corporation organization that is currently established and is developing closer ties with the e u and the coupling of the eurasian integration projects with the chinese initiatives, like the belts and road initiative, the people's republic of china and the e, you have signed

a corresponding agreement. the coupling of integration processes include more and more territory. aside from the e, u and the s c o. these organizations have also sign memorandums of mutual understanding with the theater. and this is the so called great eurasia project. the ration partnership will connect the whole continent. president putin spoke about the russia as the in summit 6 years ago. and this project is taking shape based on real processes on the ground. it has a purely eurasian aspect to. many arab nations are interested in collaborating with the see where all of the other leading sub regions of our great continent represented the substances positive alliances that don't seek rivalry with anybody at becoming a global trend. the membership of bricks proves it, brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa, all saudi friends in argentina, expressed similar interest in this organization. through the foreign minister valentina has declared the nations intent to become a full member of briggs. the preparation for its next summit is under way,

which will feature an outreach full met, a dozen countries developing mostly will participate in it. said the progress is that and we know our western friends have many phobias and complexes a superiority and infallibility complexity, for example. but they also paranoid because they see opposition and a threat to that dominance in any process they don't control or not parts of its time to get rid of such habits. but of course you do a per slid near. would you say the recent russia, china join military exercises are indicative of sampling of to put those in the us? this is an extension of our partnership with change to strength and security in the region. russia and china hold regular military droves and various of the exercises together. the goal is to enhance our anti terrorism coordination and strengthen our common borders as members of the shanghai corporation organization. russia and china have a long history of fruitful corporation in the area of defense. for years now, we've held regular exercises in the areas where we share borders,

where our security interests overlap. this reflects the responsibility and commitment of both russia and china to massive security and going to 61 ascii, the anglo saxon allies, has shown 0 concern about the problem of biological weapons. despite all the evidence revealed by russia, how can we make the world recognize the dangers of biological warfare? although if you read the press, especially in the russian speaking world, they talk about a historic moment. now the trasha has exposed those slabs through the world, but it more than the ocean. this is in direct violation of the biological and talks in weapons convention. under this convention for years we have advocated the creation of a transparent and universal verification mechanism. in these efforts, we've been supported by all of the countries except the united states. the proposed mechanism would allow all countries to verify that none of the parties to the convention are in violation of their obligations since 2001 from moulton, 20 years,

the u. s is vehemently oppose this initiative. we know today why they have dr disposition, because all these years they have been creating military biological bar trees around the world. there is an entire division of the pentagon, the defense threats, reduction agency in charge of these operations. in developing the network of military and biological, the bar trees, the pentagon is directed special attention to the former soviet union countries. and you raise your in general. if you look at the available data on where such laboratories have been set up, you can see they've been established primarily along the border of the russian federation and in close proximity to the people's republic of china. initially, we expected that the experiments conducted in these laboratories and not exactly peaceful or innocent in nature. then the russian forces, along with the dentist send the guns, militias discovered these lavar trees and married the city liberated as part of the special military operation. the americans who abandoned these the bar trees in haste, before the arrival of the troops attempted to destroy all the documents in samples,

but they couldn't wipe out all evidence. passage in samples that survived, as well as documents found clearly demonstrate that the purpose of those experiments whose military wellness from the same documents, it became clear that there had dozens of similar lives across the crane. so we will work to ensure that 1st of all, the evidence we have presented to the un security council is taken very seriously. as you've pointed out, the overwhelming majority of developing countries do take it seriously. and secondly, this information lay the groundwork for concrete actions to be taken under the biological weapons convention. the united states must clarify what exactly they were up to. and we will also investigate further reports that certain other countries, namely, the u. k. in germany were involved in these experiments, specifically those conducted in the ukranian lapse. i asked him if it's not classified, what else did you find love or terese like these close to russia? nice. you know, it's not. there are similar labs in armenia because it's done and in several centralization increase. we are working with these countries through bilateral

channels. and as members of the collective security treaty organization to address these issues with virtually every c s, t o country and other members of the c i. s. we have signed or in the process of signing memorandums on biological security. under these memorandums countries agree to inform each other of their respective biological research programs. naturally, this requires transparency. so we can make sure none of these programs have a military dimension to them. that's forbidden by the convention. we will also, these memorandums allow the site to visit each other's research facilities and examined the activities of their by a lapse. in addition, it stated in the documents that there must be no military representatives of any 3rd party. it's any of our biological facilities would according to this, in what way would these cancers benefit from hosting bio labs like these some material gain maybe, but the dea yoga looked at all so you can so use firstly,

the soviet union had a massive biological research program when the ussr signed the biological and talks in weapons convention, the program was stripped of all its military components. but the research itself was still valuable from a scientific standpoint. when the usaa saw collapsed in 1991, we all remember what state our country was in. the very integrity of russia was at stake. we had no reserves to pay off a national debt. a people didn't have the money to purchase, even the basic every day. necessities are western partners quickly seize the moment, as they say they offered their services. in all aspects of life penetrated all areas of the newly independent countries. they sent their advises their consultants and now were reaping the results. but times of change. these are no longer young and inexperienced. freshly independent republics that have just woken up from the soviet dream. this is all in the past now. all the former soviet republics have grown stronger, established themselves as completely sovereign and independent states. they can now decide for themselves which partners to choose in the international arena. we have

agreements with them saying that the commitments they made back then as part of the c, i s the c s t o and the eurasian economic union. that these commitments must be julie respected by other countries that are interested in fostering relations with all the states of the former soviet union in a little and of course we engaged in discussions about the problems we will face back then during the formation of our new statehood through various agencies. we continue to exchange information about the risks associated with such seamless collaboration with foreign countries. insensitive aries. in addition, naturally, biological research is one of those areas. and as i said, we now have an understanding that we share by security issues. issues that directly affect public health and the environment are within the jurisdiction of the collective security treaty organization. so we will continue to work in a constructive manner in accordance with all these statutory documents. ah,

ah, if this current gale this alliance between the mark rises and did the tear, it is somehow gets reflected throughout the next 6 years. this would even called promiscuous power sharing would even mean that perhaps it would be sirens and tara did that. we had run in 2028 with another mark was as a running mate, and then they will just switch. and this will have been for years in years simply because the dynasty part dale will solidify ah da now ter, kenny tally are proposing some sort of a plan to bring cross shine key of back to the negotiation table. there's even a name for it already. their own plan is russia willing to engage in the negotiations that so far failed to produce any results. well,

her logo does good. we've talked about it many times before. our western colleagues simply decided to use lensky and use all citizens of ukraine to the very last person to try and contain russia. they want to close as much damage to russia as possible to try and defeat rush from the battlefield. and the, talking openly about this in washington, in berlin, in london, especially in london. and in warsaw. of course, in warsaw there went so far as to propose to wipe out the entire russian world, comparing it to a cancerous chima on the body of mankind. for years rushes tried to make people listen. we've tried to explain so many times why nato expansion, eastwards and ukraine being pulled into nato, aren't acceptable. they heard us, but they didn't listen. all they had to do was make ukraine comply with its commitments. they failed to do that in 2014, when there was acute attack in ukraine. despite the guarantees of the for years we've been calling on care to fulfill its obligations. at one point the landscape

government publicly stated that they would never talk to these people, meaning the dumbass authorities and the west still covered for them. even though they were required to talk to these people by the un security council resolution that approved the minsk agreements. then they said they would never carry out the midst agreements that they would rather die than grunt these republics, any special status. meanwhile, ukraine passed the series of laws banning the russian language and education and in the media. the use of the russian language was prohibited even in everyday situation, as only the ukrainian language was recognized as the language of every day communication the ukrainians. let's not forget what lensky said about that. if anyone feels russian and they should feel free to go back to russia, he said that in september 2021. we heard all these humiliating anti russian racist statements, and we saw ukraine's near nazi policies which were becoming enshrined in ukrainian law. we tried to make the western nations the o. s. c, the council of europe and the relevant, you embodied take notice,

but there was no reaction. occasionally someone would say, well, yes, they have to comply with their internal obligations. but zalinski could not care less about his government's international obligations, or the constitution of ukraine, which expressly guarantees the rights of ukraine's russian speaking population. they spats on the constitution on all the international conventions and kept pushing through the anti russian laws. we've explained why we had to make committees, and our findings that the ukranian army positions during the special operation suggests that it was almost too late to commence that on february the 24th. they were planning to launch a so called plan b on march the 8th, a large ukrainian force that had been deployed on the line of contact by mid february was meant to launch in assault and take over the dumbass. that would have been a severe violation of the minced agreements and the un security council resolution because i have no doubts that had they succeeded. the west would have turned a blind eye to these violations just like it has been doing. so for the past 8 years and, and when care of proposed negotiations, a few days since the operation,

we immediately agreed several rounds were held in person and betters. we were trying to understand the position of ukrainian colleagues what they were trying to achieve. so we made our position clear after a few rounds and barriers and online, we scheduled a meeting and it's tumble. during that meeting, the ukrainian side finally provided its proposals in writing for the 1st time. the document was signed by the head of their delegation. we studied their proposals, reporting it to the president and confirm to ukraine and colleagues that we were ready to have them as a starting point. and since those were just disjointed elements and not the proper draft, we prepared one on its basis. and i can't stress this enough with that draft was based on the ukrainian proposals. then we forward it to our ukranian colleagues. but the next day we had another gross stage provocation in butcher. 3 peaceful days had passed after the russian army left the city. when bodies were found in the streets, and russia was accused of mass murder, you know, what happened next year?

the west introduced another round of sanctions as if it knew what was going to happen. and ukraine said it had changed its approach and wanted to reformulate the principles of the peace treaty. nevertheless, the contacts continued. as of today, the current draft is on the ukrainian side and no progress has been made. but as to who's ready for talks, the landscape is giving an interview. recently. he's talking to somebody every day these days. so he's giving an interview and he said he was ready for talk, but only between him and post it. there is no point in talks on any of the level. he thought there shouldn't be any mediators. and only after ukraine regains control of its territory on the borders as of february, the 23rd. i guess i don't have to explain that this is just silly, but nobody can deny the west benefits from this irrational stubbornness. i've said before that the west is called to inflict a military defeat of russia. so the war has to go on. they need to arm ukrainian, nationalists, weapons into ukraine, including those that can hit russian territory. president lensky is public. you

requested such weapons. we've strongly warned the west against providing them. it is effectively waging a proxy war against russia using the hands bodies and minds of ukrainian neo nazis . but long range weapons would drastically escalate the conflict. and i sincerely hope that the few reasonable people in the west understand that. yes, we're looking into negotiations right now, but it's already been advertised as some kind of break through step. the same goes for the italian initiative. we haven't seen anything so far. or we hear respect relations and the descriptions of this piece initiative, the surface in the media. but from what we've read, if that is the real deal, then i must say it's regrettable how little the author of this initiative understand about the subject or about the history of the problem. if what i saw was correct, then they talk about crimea and the dumbass being parts of ukraine as regions with broad autonomy, no serious politician. he wants to actually achieve progress on the issue and not just advertising self to his electra will propose something like that. the dumbass could have returned to ukraine a long time ago if the ukraine in governments,

but portion coast and the landscape had complied with immense agreements and granted special status to these people. the people who refused to accept the code. all they wanted was to retain the russian language. also, this italian initiative you spoke about says that in addition to the reconciliation between rush from ukraine, if the media report correctly, they also want to launch a new helsinki process to ensure the security of everyone in europe. funny how our friends in rooms suddenly remembered the helsinki process. now, when it's too late, because the helsinki process gave the world as well as our region, the euro, atlantic region, a number of very important things. getting in, for example, the declaration signed the highest level at the summit of the organization for security and cooperation in europe. specifically in assemble in 1999 and in astonish, in 2010. these documents and trying the principle of indivisibility of security. they said that security can only be equal and indivisible. these documents

contained a detailed formulation. every country has the right to choose its own alliances, but no country can choose its alliances or otherwise strengthened, security in a way that would undermine the security of any of the country. and the 3rd component of this formula, no country, no organisation in the o. s c complained to dominate security issues. anyone who is familiar with the situation in europe understands that the key components of this commitment being flagrantly violated by western countries. they believe they are reinforcing their own security by opening violating rushes rights to its own security. they insist the only native can call the shots in this region and no one else. so we try to make these noble political concepts into reality. they don't just remain words on paper, followed by the signatures of americas in europe's presidents. but so that they can actually make a change in the world. so we put forward a suggestion. let's turn this political commitment to one i just told you about into an actual treaty. let's give it some legal power. back in 2009. we propose such a treaty to the nato countries. they said that they would not even consider discussing

it. do you know why this is important? they said only nato can provide legal security guarantees than we say. but what about the o s. c? you will have your signatures head, don't you? they respond with, well, these are political promises slogans that. so, this is very telling as to how western politicians treat, that president signatures. but that wasn't our only attempt. we tried again later. i gave you the 20092013 time light up. and then the cou happened in 2014 the minsk agreements in 2015 because all those years we kept saying their colleagues, this will not happen well, because you are ignoring all legitimate interests. you're rudely saying no. when we're just asking you to consider all legitimate concerns and we were not talking about some regions, tens of thousands of kilometers away, we were discussing the situation at the russian border. imagine the hypocrisy, the odessa to the colonial mentality. i am allowed to do whatever, while you will do what i tell you, and we see this everywhere,

not just in the treatments of our interests when they need to remember how in 1999 in the united states, suddenly decided that you get sloppy with a threat to american national security, 10000 kilometers away from the u. s. coast, and they just bombed it. they use the american who headed up the o. a c mission at that time, william walker, he cried genocide after several bodies who discovered in red check. as it turned out later, these were not civilians but militants. they dressed them as civilians and laid out their bodies. similar to how things were staged in boots at nick care on 8 for the 23rd this year. the same technique. and it works even when it's not too convincing . they don't need to convince anyone they bomb the yugoslavia. they recognize conservation dependence, breaking all our c principles. and then they said, this is how it's going to be. by the way, after the referendum in crimea, they said no cost of self determination is right. but crimea self determination is wrong in 2003, the us decided that another country, 10000 kilometers away,

post the threat to america, iraq. they showed a vial with powder, i think poor column power lay to complain that he had been set up by his intelligence agencies. in several years later, tony blair admitted yes, we made a mistake, but oh, well, what are you going to do? obviously by then there was nothing anyone could do. they bought the country for millions of civilians were killed in iraq, territorial, and he is still in jeopardy. and the country is facing numerous problems. serious ones like terrorism, for example, which wasn't a problem before the invasion. yes, iraq and libya had authoritarian governments but no terrace. these were not combat settings with conflicts rising all the time. hibler libby, as another example in 2011 obama said that america will be leading behind europe. spac, france, the most democratic country in old europe, with its liberty, a gala tag frontend, to take principle, had it up the nature operation against the reggie, and ended up destroying the whole country. and libya's having

a really hard time getting back to normal. the french of course, now trying to help they keep coming up with various initiatives, hold conferences, amount, selection dates, but nothing is working. they should have thoughts about libby as feature after the west interference for the sake of the country security. i am not referring to this to say that if they are allowed to do it, why aren't we? this would be a simplification of a very complex issue. i'm just giving you examples of how the west thinks and operates. they consider the whole world, their security, so therefore they should decide for the whole world. look at nato, when nato crew to our borders. they responded to all our concerns by saying, don't worry nato's a defensive alliance. it doesn't threaten your security. firstly, this is diplomatic insolence. we should be the ones to decide what is in the interest of our security, just like any of the country. and secondly, the north atlantic treaty organization was a defense alliance when it had someone to defend itself from italy, when the war, so packed and soviet union dissipated, the defense line dissipated as well. any military academy graduate will tell you

that both that they maintain their military substance and continued to move the defense light, bringing it to a border. we've just covered in detail the results of this policy. in recent months, nato secretary general and other hawks like the u. k foreign minister of declared that nato should take on global obligations. nato must ensure security in the pacific region. i guess it means that next time nate has line of defense will move to the south china sea. and it's not just nato e. u. lead is also decided to play wall or you ursula vaughn de line can now compete with the east tough diplomat, joseph burrell, in how hawkish this she also mentioned that the e should take responsibility for security in the, in their pacific. the gl, how are they going to do it? so they're talking about some e u army, but nature will not let them have the song while the alliance exists. and it sounds like the alliance will not even be reformed alia. on the contrary, it wants to turn into alliance with global dominance ambitions. this is a very dangerous path, and this plan will inevitably fail. spicy, rambo,

by showing. thank you very much. one important question left. our viewers want to know about syria. how is this situation going to affect crochase military presence there? women, whom so gumble, prose, boom, our presence was requested by the legitimate president of the syrian arab republic, the legitimate government of that country, and is completely in line with the principles of the un charter. we are addressing the tasks set out by the security council in resolution to 254. we will continue to do so. and we will support the syrian leadership in its efforts to fully restore the territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic. because there are still military units of states that were never invited, that in the u. s. military, for example, which has occupied a large part of the eastern bank of the euphrates, is openly creating cause i states directly encouraging separatism and exploiting the sentiments of the parts of the kurdish population in iraq to that end. problems arise between the various entities that represent the iraqi and syrian cuts.

naturally, all of this contributes to tensions in this part of the region. tech is understandably getting involved as well. what we want to solve these problems exclusively on the basis of respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic. as we speak with the codes, we have channels of communication with all of them. and we encourage them to look more closely at recent examples of how the united states promises things and how they keep those promises, you know, ah ah

ah, with with

ah, to put a dollar you talking about your future a told their children by the school as well, but i see a.