for example, in energy and i t a little then on june, the 1st i will take pots in the regular session of the foreign ministers form of golf corporation council, russia and riot. this is a format that has been around for quite some time. g to cove at 19 there was a pause in our meetings. now our friends have suggested we resumed the practice. in addition to the g. c. c, russia forum. we will also have bilateral meetings with almost all members of the organization. all arab nations have adopted an ass sheet of responsibility. they have proven that they always act in a way that best serves the national interests, and that they wouldn't sacrifice these interests for the sake of some one else's cheer political schemes. overall, our relations based on mutual respect, respect, the fundamental interests of the arab countries. and we take their security concerns seriously when you, while they in town recognize threats to russia. security. the threats that the collective west has been engineering for decades, right on our borders, trying to use ukraine to contain russia and inflict serious damage on

a country las mr. o'clock. we do believe they are ready to continue with that policy. despite the western pressure, the anglo saxon align says, we college loveless, douglas social. yes, the anglo saxon alliance has infinite ghoul and they show it daily. the west doesn't honor its obligations under the you and charles had to respect the sovereign equality of states and abstained from interfering in their internal affairs. instead, it keeps sending its ambassadors an emissaries to arab nations and every of the capital of the well to bluntly blackmail and deliver ultimatums. it also uses certain situations in its black mailing efforts and directly threatens of the party . his punishment. you're saying they will regret not joining the sanctions against russia. this is outright disrespect of sovereign nations, but by the reaction of the arab nations and most of the states in asia, africa, and latin america, we see that they don't want to sacrifice their national pride and be lucky to their senior partners. because it only shows that the colonial states of mind than habits of our west and colleagues had never che. the u. s. in europe is still thinking

along those lines in each, in their own historical style. they think they can impose their will and others. this isn't rights and it's deplorable. it goes against the historical process of forming a multi polar world with several centers of economic growth, financial power, and political influence. this no doubt, the india and china of the world's most fast growing economies with a lot of influence. just like brazil and other latin american countries, the colonialists repressed the potential of africa that lies in its immense amounts of natural resources. they're still repressing it in the neo colonial age. the hasn't ended yet. so africa is raising his voice too. i am positive that the arab middle east is one of the pillars of the emerging multi polar world mcgiver in her hershey at nash, russia, china, india, and other nations have friendly relations. could we see in the lines of those nations to oppose the u. s. blog, when you go, this is the young orleans. we never founded alliances or buddied up against anybody

. and we have an extensive and well established network of partner organizations. so these are the structures created after the collapse of the soviet union. but the commonwealth of independent states, the collective security treaty organization, and the eurasian economic union. there are also organizations that bring together plays across a great geopolitical landscape, such as the shanghai corporation organization that has currently established and is developing closer ties with the e, a. e u and the coupling of the eurasian integration projects with the chinese initiatives, like the belton road initiative, the bully of the people's republic of china, and the e a. e, you have signed a corresponding agreement. the coupling of integration processes include more and more territories. aside from the e, a, u and the s c o. these organizations have also psy memorandums of mutual understanding with a z. and this is the so called great a eurasia project. the ration partnership that will connect the whole continent president potent spoke about to at the russia as the in summit 6 years ago. and

this project is taking shape based on real processes on the ground. it has a purely eurasian aspect to it. many arab nations are interested in collaborating with the s c o, where all of the other leading sub regions of all great continent represented substances, positive alliances that don't seek rivalry with anybody of becoming a global trend of the membership of bricks proves it. brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa. i'll saudi friends and argentina expressed similar interest in this organization. when the foreign minister of valentina has declared the nations intent to become a full member of bricks. the preparation for its next summit is on the way which will feature an outreach full met, a dozen countries developing mostly will participate in it. said the progress is that and we know a western friends have many phobias and complexes a superiority and infallibility complex. for example, but they also paranoid because they see opposition and a threat to that dominance in any process they don't control or not parts of. it's

time to get rid of such habits. but of course, you do a posted near, would you say the recent rush to china join military exercises are indicative of sampling of the put of those in english. this is an extension of our partnership, which aims to strength and security in the region. russia and china hold regular military droves and various of the exercises together. the goal is to enhance our anti terrorism coordination and strengthen our common borders as members of the shanghai cooperation organization. russia and china have a long history of fruitful corporation in the area of defense. for years now, we've held regular exercises in the areas where we share borders, where our security interests overlap. this reflects the responsibility and commitment of both russia and china to massive security. i'm going to 61 ascii, the anglo saxon allies has shown 0 concern of all the problem of biological weapons . despite all the evidence revealed by russia, how can we make the world recognize the dangers of biological warfare?

oh, if you read the pass, especially in the russian speaking world, they talk about a historic moment. now the trasha has exposed though slabs through the world, but more than the ocean. this is in direct violation of the biological and talks in weapons convention. under this convention for years, we have advocated the creation of a transparent and universal verification mechanism. in these efforts weaving, supported by all of the countries except the united states. the proposed mechanism would allow all countries to verify that none of the parties to the convention or in violation of their obligations since 2001 for more than 20 years, the u. s. is vehemently oppose this initiative. we know today why they have adopted this position because all these years, they have been creating military biological laboratories around the world. there is an entire division of the pentagon, the defense threats, reduction agency in charge of these operations. in developing that network of military and biological, the bar trees. the pentagon is directed special attention to the former soviet

union countries, and eurasia in general. if you look at the available data on why such laboratories have been set up, you can see they've been established primarily along the border of the russian federation and in close proximity to the people's republic of china. initially, we expected that the experiments conducted in these laboratories and not exactly peaceful or innocent in nature, then the russian on forces along with it the net sin against malicious, discovered these labarte trees him are equal, the city liberated as parts of the special military operation. the americans who abandoned these labarte trees in haste, before the arrival of the troops attempted to destroy all the documents in samples, but they couldn't wipe out all evidence that the pathogen samples that survived, as well as documents found clearly demonstrate that the purpose of those experiments whose military wellness from these same documents, it became clear that there had dozens of similar labs across ukraine. so we will work to ensure that festival, the evidence we have presented to the un security council is taken very seriously.

as you pointed out, the overwhelming majority of developing countries do take it seriously. and secondly, that this information lays the groundwork for concrete actions to be taken under the biological weapons convention. the united states must clarify what exactly they were up to, and we will also investigate further reports that certain other countries, namely, the u cane germany were involved in these experiments. specifically those conducted in the ukranian lapse earth. if it's salt classified, where else to define laboratories like these close to russia nuclear, no, it's not. will. there are similar labs in armenia cassock, sun, and in several central asian countries. we are working with these countries through bilateral channels. and as members of the collective security treaty organization to address these issues with virtually every c s, t o country and other members of the c i. s. we have signed or in the process of signing memorandums on biological security. under these memorandums countries agree to inform each other of their respective biological research programs. naturally,

this requires transparency. so we can make sure none of these programs have a military dimension to them. that's forbidden by the convention. you are also these memorandums allow the site to visit each other's research facilities and examined the activities of that by a lapse. in addition, it states it in the documents that there must be no military representatives of any 3rd party. it's any of our biological facilities would crystal, according to this, in what way would these countries benefit from hosting bio labs like these some material gain maybe. but the young lady yodel looked at all so you can so use firstly, the soviet union had a massive biological research program. when the ussr signed the biological and talks in weapons convention, the program was stripped of all its military components. but the research itself was still valuable from a scientific standpoint. when the u. s. a saw collapse in 1991, we all remember what state our country was in. the very integrity of russia was at stake. we had no reserves to pay off

a national debt. a people didn't have the money to purchase even the basic every day. necessities are western partners quickly seize the moment, as they say they offered their services in all aspects of life penetrates. in all areas of the newly independent countries, they sent their advises their consultants and now were reaping the results. but times have changed. these are no longer young and inexperienced. freshly independent republics, the of just woken up from the soviet dream. this is all in the past. now. all the former soviet republics have grown stronger, established themselves as completely sovereign and independent states. they can now decide for themselves which partners to choose in the international arena. we have agreements with them saying that the commitments they made back then as part of the c, i s, the c s t o and the eurasian economic union. that these commitments must be julie respected by other countries that are interested in fostering relations with all the states of the former soviet union in a little and of course we engaged in discussions about the problems we will face

back then during the formation of on you statehood through various agencies and we continue to exchange information about the risks associated with such seamless collaboration with foreign countries. insensitive varies. in addition, naturally, biological research is one of those areas. and as i said, we now have an understanding that we share by security issues, issues that directly affect public health and the environment are within the jurisdiction of the collective security treaty organization. so we will continue to work in a constructive manner in accordance with all these statutory documents. still do most of them. ah, with those are for the new business and you will clean them priyah b. e w that was chosen yeah, americans, grey you, when you wrote it,

you did go through it is just such an article and also provide you with such a short emergency author of the different student info, which of course, you know, you get thrown the width of the protein, you're still there with her, as you talk to you that are both in the study. she was on that list of menu for each of to watch. so blues for me to, to one off on all things to sort of put it which you, which in the longer you bullshit just in new to this from up and pushed 2 to 3 people to mon because or least new or universal do full of course i don't know who you're you're i know for the don't know as much of a do use for us to put in finances. come on both with

ah 20 a year now ter, kenny tally are proposing some sort of a plan to bring russia and key of back to the negotiation table. there's even a name for it already. their own plan is russia willing to engage in the negotiations that so far failed to produce any results. well, her logo does good. we've talked about it many times before. our western colleagues simply decided to use zalinski and use all citizens of ukraine to the very last person to try and contain russia. they want to cause as much damage to russia as possible to try and defeat rush from the battlefield. and they're talking openly about this in washington in berlin, in london, especially in london. and in warsaw. of course, in warsaw they went so far as to propose to wipe out the entire russian world,

comparing it to a cancerous tumor on the body of mankind. for years rushes tried to make people listen. we've tried to explain so many times why nato expansion, eastwards and ukraine being pulled into nato. ern acceptable. they heard us, but they didn't listen. all they had to do was make ukraine comply with its commitments. they failed to do that in 2014, when there was a queue detach, and ukraine. despite the guarantees of the for years we've been calling on care to fulfill its obligations. at one point the landscape company publicly stated that they would never talk to these people, meaning the dumbass authorities and the west still covered for them. even though they were required to talk to these people by the un security council resolution that approved the minsk agreements. then they said they would never carry out the midst agreements that they would rather die than grunt these republics, any special status. meanwhile, ukraine passed the series of laws banning the russian language and education and in the media. the use of the russian language was prohibited even in everyday

situation, as only the ukrainian language was recognized as the language of every day communication the ukrainians. let's not forget what the lensky said about, but if anyone feels russian, they should feel free to go back to russia. he said that in september 2021, we heard all these humiliating anti russian racist statements. and we saw ukraine's near nazi policies which were becoming enshrined in ukrainian law. we tried to make the western nations the o. s. c, the council of europe and the relevant you and bodies take notice. but there was no reaction. occasionally, someone would say, well, yes, they have to comply with their internal obligations. polanski could not care less about his governments international obligations or the constitution of ukraine, which expressly guarantees the rights of ukraine's russian speaking population. they spat from the constitution on all the international conventions and kept pushing through the anti russian laws. we've explained why we had to make committed . and our findings that the ukranian army positions during the special operation

suggests that it was almost too late to commence on february the 24th. they were planning to launch a so called plan b on march the 8th, a large ukrainian force that had been deployed on the line of contact by mid february was meant to launch in assault and take over the dumbass. that would have been a severe violation of the minced grievance and the un security council resolution because i have no doubts that had they succeeded. the westwood have turned the blind eye to these violations just like it has been doing. so for the past 8 years . and when care proposed negotiations a few days since the operation, we immediately agreed. several rounds were held in person and betters. we were trying to understand the position of ukrainian colleagues what they were trying to achieve. so we made our position clear. after a few rounds and bellows, and on line, we scheduled a meeting and some book. during that meeting, the ukrainian side finally provided its proposals in writing for the 1st time. the document was signed by the head of the delegation. we studied that proposals

reporting it to the president and confirm to ukraine and colleagues that we were ready to have them as a starting point. and since, so we just disjointed elements, not the proper draft. we've prepared one on its basis and i can't stress this enough with that draft was based on the ukrainian proposals and then we forward it to our ukranian colleagues. but the next day, we had another gross stage provocation in butcher. 3 peaceful days had passed after the russian army left the city. when bodies were found in the streets and russia was accused of mass murder. you know what happened next? the west introduced another round of sanctions as if it knew what was going to happen. and ukraine said it had changed its approach and wanted to reformulate the principles of the peace treaty. nevertheless, the contacts continued as of today, the current draft is on the ukrainian side and no progress has been made for us to who's ready for talks to the landscape is giving an in the recently he's talking to somebody every day these days. so he's giving an interview and he said he was ready for talk,

but only between him and post it. there is no point in talks on any of the level. he thought there shouldn't be any mediators. and only after ukraine regains control of its territory on the borders as of february, the 23rd. i said i have to explain that this is just silly, but nobody can deny the west benefits from this irrational stubbornness. i've said before that the west is called to inflict the military defeat of russia. so the war has to go on. they need to arm ukrainian nationalist weapons into ukraine, including those that can hit russian territory. president soleski is public. you requested such weapons. we have strongly warned the west against providing them. it is effectively waging the proxy war against russia using the hands bodies and minds of ukrainian near not seasons. but long range weapons would drastically escalate the conflict. and i sincerely hope that the few reasonable people in the west understand that yes, we're looking into negotiations right now, but it's already been advertised as some kind of break through step. the same goes for the italian initiative. we haven't seen anything so far. we hear re

speculations and the descriptions of this piece finished to the surface in the media. but from what we've read, if that is the real deal, then i must say it's regrettable how little the authors of this initiative understand about the subject or about the history of the problem. if what i saw was correct, then they talk about crimea and the dumbass being parts of ukraine as regions with broad autonomy, no serious politician. he wants to actually achieve progress on the issue and not just advertising self to his electro will propose something like that. the dumbass could have returned to ukraine a long time ago, if ukrainian governments but portion coast answer landscape had complied with immense agreements and granted special status to these people. the people who refused to accept the coat all they wanted was to retain the russian language. also, this italian initiative he spoke about says that in addition to the reconciliation between rush from ukraine, if the media reports a correctly, they also want to launch a new helsinki process to ensure the security of everyone in europe. funny, how a friends in rome suddenly remembered the helsinki process. now,

when it's too late, because the helsinki process gave the world as well as our region, the euro, atlantic region, a number of very important things are used to renew. for example, the declaration signed to the highest level at the summits of the organization for security and cooperation in europe. specifically in assemble in 1999 and in astonish, in 2010. these documents and trying the principle, if in the visibility of security, they said that security can only be equal and indivisible. these documents contained the detailed formulation. every country has the right to choose its own alliances, but no country can choose its alliances or otherwise strengthen its security in a way that would undermine the security of any of the country. and the 3rd components of this formula, no country, no organization in the o. s. c complained to dominate security issues. anyone who is familiar with the situation in europe understands that the key components of this commitment and being flagrantly violated by western countries. they believe they are reinforcing

their own security by opening violating rushes rights to its own security. they insist the only nay to control the shots in this region and no one else. so we try to make these noble political concepts into reality so that they don't just remain words on paper, followed by the signatures of americas, in europe's presidents. but said that they can actually make a change in the world. so we put forward a suggestion. let's turn this political commitment to one i just told you about into an actual treaty. let's give it some legal power. back in 2009. we propose such a treaty to the nato countries. they said that they would not even consider discussing it. do you know why this is important? they said only nato can provide legal security guarantees than we say. but what about the a see if you will have your signatures head, don't you? they respond with, well, these are political promises slogans that so this is very telling as to how western politicians treat, that president signatures. but that wasn't our only attempt. we tried again later. i gave you the 20092013 timeline. and then the qu happened in 2014,

the minsk agreements in 2015 because all those years we kept saying they colleagues, this will not happen well because you are ignoring all legitimate interests. you're rudely saying no. when we are just asking you to consider all legitimate concerns and we were not talking about some regions, tens of thousands of kilometers away, we were discussing the situation at the russian border. imagine the hypocrisy, the odessa to the colonial mentality. i am allowed to do whatever, while you will do what i tell you, and we see this everywhere, not just in the treatments of our interests when they need to remember how in 1999, the united states suddenly decided that you get sloppy was a threat to american national security. 10000 kilometers away from the u. s. coast, and they just bombed it. they use the american who headed up the o. s. c mission at that time, william walker. he cried, genocide after several bodies who discovered in red check as it turned out later, these were not civilians but militants. they dressed them as civilians and laid out

their bodies. similar to how things were staged in boots at nic here on april the 23rd. this year, the same technique and it works even when it's not too convincing. they don't need to convince anyone they bomb the yugoslavia. they recognize conservation dependence, breaking all our c principles. and then they said, this is how it's going to be. by the way, after the referendum in crimea, they said no cost of self determination is right. but crimea self determination is wrong. in 2003, the us decided that another country, 10000 kilometers away, post the threat to america, iraq. they showed a file with powder, i think poor column power lay to complain that he had been set up by his intelligence agencies. in several years later, tony blair admitted yes, we made a mistake, but oh, well, what are you going to do? obviously by then there was nothing anyone could do the bomb, the country for millions of civilians were killed in iraq, territorial, and tag. he is still in jeopardy, and the country is facing numerous problems. serious ones like terrorism,

for example, which wasn't a problem before the invasion. yes, iraq and libya had authoritarian governments but no terrace. these were not combat settings with conflicts rising all the time. hibler libby as another example in 2011 obama said that america will be leading behind europe. spac, france, the most democratic country in old europe, with its liberty, a gala tag, fraternity principle, had it up the nature operation against the reggie and ended up destroying the whole country. and libya's having a really hard time getting back to normal. the french of course, and now trying to help they keep coming up with various initiatives called conferences, amount selection dates, but nothing is working. they should have thoughts about libby as future after the west interference for the sake of the country security. i am not referring to this to say that if they are allowed to do it, why aren't we? this would be a simplification of a very complex issue. i'm just giving you examples of how the west thinks and operates. they consider the whole world, their security,

so therefore they should decide for the whole world. look at nato. when they took crew to our borders. they responded to all our concerns by saying, don't worry nato's defensive alliance. it doesn't threaten your security. firstly, this is diplomatic insolence. we should be the ones to decide what is in the interest of our security, just like any of the country. and secondly, the north atlantic treaty organization was a defense alliance when it had someone to defend itself from italy, when the war, so packed and soviet union dissipate, the defense line dissipate as well. any military academy graduate will tell you that both that they maintain their military substance and continued to move the defense light, bringing it to a border. we've just covered in detail the results of this policy. in recent months, nato secretary general and other hawks like the u. k foreign minister of the clad that nato should take on global obligations, nato must and show security in the pacific region. i guess it means that next time nate has line of defense will move to the south china sea. and it's not just nato e u. lead is also decided to play wool,

so you learn to lavonda line can now compete with the east tough diplomat, joseph burrell, in how hawkish this she also mentioned that the e should take responsibility for the security in the, in the pacific. the gl, how are they going to do with what they're talking about, some e u army, of that nature will not let them have the sa me while the alliance exists. and it sounds like the alliance will not even be reformed a year. on the contrary, it wants to turn into alliance with global dominance ambitions. this is a very dangerous path, and this plan will inevitably fail. spicy, rambo, by showing. thank you very much. one important question left. our viewers want to know about syria. how is this situation going to affect crochase military presence their day when the horde? hm. so, gumble broadview, our presence was requested by the legitimate president of the syrian arab republic, the legitimate government of that country and is completely in line with the principles of the un charter. we are addressing the tasks set out by the security council in resolution to 254. we will continue to do so. and we will support the

syrian leadership in its efforts to fully restore the territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic. because there are still military units of states that whenever invited that in the u. s. military, for example, which has occupied a large part of the eastern bank of the euphrates, is opening crating cause i states directly encouraging separatism and exploiting the sentiments of a parts of the kurdish population in iraq to that end. problems arise between the various entities that represent the iraqi and syrian cuts. naturally, all of this contributes to tensions in this part of the region which are tech is understandably getting involved as well. for us. we want to solve these problems exclusively on the basis of respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic, as we speak with the cause. we have channels of communication with all of them. and we encourage them to look more closely at recent examples of how the united states promises things and how they keep those promises. ah,

look forward to talking to you. oh, that technology should work. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. and the point obviously is to place trust rather than fear a very job with artificial intelligence. real summoning with a robot most protective foam existence with for

the drive to sanction russia. and anyone who does business with russia is wrecking havoc on the global economy. the goal is to punish russia so far the russian economy remain stable. this cannot be said for other economies around the world. in fact, those who sanction are feeling enormous pain and suffering a with that with a,

with the done yet, the people's republic says it's gain control of 220 localities from ukrainian forces since the war erupted. 3 months ago, and russia doubled down on terrorism accusations against give troops in the dumbass . protesters demanded stricter gun control laws after yet another mast shooting at this time at a school in texas, tens of shock waves through the nation. and a political tension in pakistan, player up after hundreds of members of the out the prime ministers party have been arrested with 2 reportedly killed in classes with police. with broadcasting lab, directory studios and moscow.