you limitation says don't boss ah, the students that we engage in dialogue with all interested parties. this was playing quite some time ago. and jerry, we had a very substances, an extended talk to president t bone in forum and it's still a member of this. we have good ties in defense in industrial sectors and actually cultural and humanitarian change. we also valued the resistance of the arab nations to the west and lead and their impartial assessments of the situation and ukraine. they don't join the sanctions regime against russia because they generally understand that the course of the current events, the blatant refusal of all western colleagues to grow on equal and impartial security in our common region. and then my oman visit was the 1st one kind of been hearing, i'll say, either seed into the throne. he gave me a warm welcome. i spent

a lot of time with me. i really appreciate it from his mom pro school doesn't require interaction with ministerials. and officials in such form talks have demonstrated that we have a lot of potential developmental, especially in trade and economy and the need. we are able to take these time, the level of political dial, both of we have lots of opportunity, for example, in energy and then on june, the 1st i will take part in the regular session of the foreign ministers forum of golf corporation, kellerso, russia, and riots way, but if this is a format that has been around for quite some time, sheets a covered 1900. there was a pause in our meeting. now our friends have suggested, we resumed, in addition to the gtc rush for. and we will also have bilateral meetings with almost all members of the organization. all arab nations have adopted and she's responsibility. and they've proven that they always are in a way that best ashlynn for us and that they wouldn't sacrifice these interests for

the sake of some one else's cheer political schemes. overall, our relations, it based on mutual respect, respect, the fundamental interests of the arab countries. and we take their security concerns seriously when you, while they in town recognize threats to russia. security threats that the collective west has been engineering for decades, right on our borders, trying to use ukraine to contain russia and inflate serious damage on a concrete las mr. o'clock. we do believe they are ready to continue with that policy. despite the western pressure, the anglo saxon aligns as we college lug, alyssa, with social. yes, the anglo saxon alliance has infinite clue and they show it daily. the west doesn't honor in subjugation is under the you and chance to respect the sovereign equality of states and abstained from interfering in their internal affairs idiom instead will keep sending its ambassadors an emissaries, the arab nations, in every other capital of the well to bluntly blackmail and deliver ultimatums loosely, it also uses certain situations in its blackmailing of it and directly threaten. so

the party of the punishment you're saying they will regret not showing the sanctions against russia. this is outright disrespect of sovereign nation pittsville. but by the reaction of the arab nations and most of the states in asia, africa, and latin america, we see that they don't want to sacrifice their national pride and be lucky to their senior partners. because it only shows that the colonial states of mind and habits of our western colleagues had never changed from the u. s. in europe is still thinking along those lines, you each in their own historical stylist. they think they can impose that will on others. assume this isn't right and it's deplorable for a bit goes against the historical process of forming a multi polar wild with several centers of economic growth, financial power, and political influence. this no doubt, the india and china of the world's most fast growing economies with a lot of influence. just like brazil and other latin american countries. the colonial and repressed the potential of africa that lies in its immense amounts of natural resources. they are still repressing it in the neo colonial. he just hasn't

ended yellowish so africa is raising his voice. tunelessly. i'm positive that the arab middle east is one of the pillars of the emerging multi polar welsh mcgiver, derushia machine, russia, china, india, and other nations have friendly relations. good. we see in the lines of those nations to oppose the u. s. blog guns. when you go to the, this is the u. haul young's, we never founded alliances, little buddied up against anybody, the new we have an extensive and well established network of partner organizations years. so lisa, the structures created after the collapse of the soviet union. but the commonwealth of independent states, so the collective security treaty organization and the duration economic union true . there are also organizations that bring together plays across a great geopolitical landscape before such as the shanghai corporation organizations of those currently established and is developing close to ties with the lea a loose. and the coupling of the eurasian integration projects with the chinese initiatives like the belt and road initiative, the bully of the people's republic of china, and the e a even have signed

a corresponding agreement issues. the coupling of integration processes include more and more territory, eula, euros, aside from the e, a, e u, and the s c o. these organizations have also side memorandums of mutual understanding with the syrian and this is the so called great c eurasia projects. is that the ration partnership? the one connect the whole continental real president poets and spoke about it at the russia as the in summit 6 years ago. so in this project is taking shape based on real processes on the ground. he has a purely eurasian athletic, many arab nations are interested in collaborating with the se, attribute wet rule of the, of the leading sub regions of all great continent representatives. the my do substances with positive alliances that don't seek rivalry with anybody of the coming a global trend to organism the membership of bricks proves it from brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa. all saudi friends and argentina expressed similar interest in miss organization will show you the foreign minister of argentina is declared, the nations intent to become

a full members. briggs during the preparation for its next summit is underway, which will feature an outreach format. she'll hold as dozen countries developing mostly will participate in it said the progress is that good, but i'm we know our western friends have many phobias and complexes of a superiority and infallibility complex, for example. but they also paranoid because they see opposition and a threat to that dominance. in any process they don't control or not policy officers. it's time to get rid of such habits as i posted near. would you say the recent rush to china join military exercises are indicative of sampling of the proposal in english? this is an extension of our partners, you, which aims to strength and security in the region or russia and china hold regular military drugs and various of the exercises together. the goal is to enhance our anti terrorism coordination and strengthen our common borders as members of the shanghai corporation, organization, issues. russia and china have a long history of fruitful corporation in the area of defense. so has gotten the

years now. we've held regular exercises in the areas where we shad boyd is using, where our security interests overlap. this reflects the responsibility and commitment with both russia and china to madison security. i get a 61 ascii, the anglo saxon allies has shown 0 concern about the problem of biological weapons . despite all the evidence revealed by russia, how can we make the world recognize the dangers of biological warfare? although if you read the press, especially in the russian speaking world, they talk about a historic moment. now the trasha area has exposed those slabs to the world, but more than the ocean. this is in direct violation with the biological and talks in weapons conventional under this convention for years we have advocates of the creation of a transparent and universal verification mechanism looks to them. in these efforts, we've been supported by all of the countries except the united states. suddenly, the proposed mechanism would allow all countries to verify that none of the policies to the convention or in violation of their obligation,

since 2001 to more than 20 years, the u. s. is vehemently oppose this initiative. we know today why they have gotten to disposition because all these years they've been creating military violence from the bar trees around the world. there is an entire division of the pentagon or the defense threats reduction in charge of these operations. in developing the network of military and biological treason for the pentagon is directed special attention to the former soviet union country and you raise your in general, if you look at the available data, such laboratories have been set up. you can see they've been established primarily along the border of the russian federation and in close proximity to the people's republic of china rising. initially, we expected that the experiments conducted in these liberties and not exactly peaceful or innocent in nature. then the russian forces, along with the guns militia, discovered these lavar trees are equal to the city liberated as part of the special military operation. the americans who abandoned the bark trees and have the arrival

of a trigger, attempted to destroy all the documents in sample. but they couldn't wipe out all of the force of the passage of samples that survived, as well as documents that was clearly demonstrate that the purpose of those experiments was military. while from the same documents. it became clear that there are dozens of similar lives across the crane. so we will work to ensure that 1st of all, the evidence we presented to the un security council is taken very seriously. as you've pointed out, the overwhelming majority of developing countries do take it serious for us. and 2nd, with this information lay the groundwork of a concrete actions to be taken under the biological weapons convention in the united states must clarify what exactly they were up to. and we will also investigate further reports that certain other country, namely the u. k. germany, gr, involved in these experiments, specifically those conducted in the ukranian lots. i asked him if it's not classified, what else did you find labord terese like the you close to russia? nice, you know, it's not a little but there are similar labs in armenia has its son and in several central

asian countries. we are working with these countries through bilateral channels. and as members of the collective security treaty organization to address these issues with virtually every c, s, d o country and other members of the c i. s. we have signed or in the process of signing memorandums on biological security. deposit under these memorandums countries agree to inform each other of their respective biological research programs. would you look naturally? this requires transparency below so we can make sure none of these programs have a military government agency that that's forbidden by the convention. whoops. also these memorandums allow decides to visits each other's research facilities and examined the activities if that bio lapse. in addition or been stated in the documents, that there must be no military representatives of any 3rd party. it's any of our biological facilities saluted. would reduce them according to this in what way would these cancer is benefit from hosting bio labs like these are some material gain maybe. but that he anita yokohama looked at all so you can so use firstly,

the soviet union had a massive biological research program. when the ussr signed the biological and talks in weapons convention, the program was driggers. of all its military components must be the research itself. it was still valuable from a scientific stem with williams of when the u. s. a saw collapse in 1991, we will remember what they tell country within the very integrity of russia was at stake. we had no reserves to pay off our national debt to so our people didn't have the money to purchase even the basic every day, necessities use your pool. our western partners quickly seize the moment as they say they offered their services in all aspects of lie of the bill penetrates. in all areas of the newly independent countries, they sent their advises their consultants and now were reaping the results. but times have changed like you. these are no longer young and inexperienced. freshly independent republics, both the of just woken up from the soviet dream. this is all in the past now doable . all the former soviet republics have grown strong gush established themselves as completely sovereign and independent states. they can now decide for themselves

which partners to choose in the international arena. what's your problem? we have agreements with them saying that the commitments they made back then as part of the c, i s, the c s t o laundry, eurasian economic union groups that these commitments must be hughley respected by other countries that are interested in fostering relations with all the status of the former soviet union over another studio. and of course we engaged in discussions about the problems we will face back then during the formation of on you statehood. move through various aidan season. we continue to exchange information about the risks associated with such seamless collaboration with foreign countries of insensitive areas. we're both in addition to naturally, biological research is one of those areas. and as i said, that we now have an understanding that we share by security ideas, issues that directly affects public health and the environment are within the jurisdiction of the collective security treaty organizational system. so we will continue to work in a constructive manner in accordance with all these see documents.

ah ah, ah, with those dumbly new machine, mister, can just look up from room of normally a muscle is around noon noon. she kitty doesn't being in the green show on a nurse to me as priscilla, mama cooked as goose sick creature. suddenly tim got up to his ashley. uh this he wanted what the 2 biggest pieces goes down to company of the bubbles. wanted new pieces, vertical zation to pick. did you bring out an up of the key cheenum crimes in metal or furnished the dr. something? yeah. leak. i had that weaker at that point there that with raised meek i have them

ah ah, don't ca now ter, kenny tele are proposing some sort of a plan to bring cross shine key of back to the negotiation table. there's even a name for it already. their own plan is russia willing to engage in the negotiations that so far failed to produce and your results? well, her login as good. we've talked about it many times before. our western colleagues simply decided to use lensky and use all citizens of ukraine to the very last person to try and contain russia. they want to cause as much damage to russia as possible to try and defeat rush from the battlefield. and the, talking openly about this in washington, in berlin, in london, especially in london. and in warsaw. of course,

in warsaw they went so far as to propose to wipe out the entire russian world, comparing it to a cancerous chima on the body of mankind. for years rushes tried to make people listen. we've tried to explain so many times why nato expansion eastwood and ukraine being pulled into nato earn. except they heard us, but they didn't listen. all they had to do was make ukraine comply with its commitments. they failed to do that in 2014, when there was acute attack in ukraine. despite the guarantees of the for years we've been calling on care to fulfill its obligations. one point to the landscape, government publicly stated that they would never talk to these people, meaning the dumbass authorities and the west still covered for them. even though they were required to talk to these people by the un security council resolution that approved the minsk agreements. then they said they would never carry out the midst agreements that they would rather die than grunt these republics, any special status. meanwhile, ukraine passed a series of laws banning the russian language and education and in the media. the

use of the russian language was prohibited even in everyday situation, as only the ukrainian language was recognized as the language of every day communication the ukrainians. let's not forget what lensky said about that. if anyone feels russian and they should feel free to go back to russia, he said that in september 2021. we heard all these humiliating anti russian races statements, and we saw ukraine's near nazi policies which were becoming enshrined in ukrainian law. we tried to make the western nations the o. s. c, the council of europe and the relevant, you embodied take notice, but there was no reaction. occasionally someone would say, well, yes, they have to comply with their internal obligations. but zalinski could not care less about his government's international obligations, or the constitution of ukraine, which expressly guarantees the rights of ukraine's russian speaking population. they spat from the constitution on all the international conventions and kept pushing through the anti russian laws. we've explained why we had to make

committees, and our findings that the ukranian army positions during the special operation suggests that it was almost too late to commence on february the 24th. they were planning to launch a so called plan b on march the 8th, a large ukrainian force that had been deployed on the line of contact by mid february was meant to launch in assault and take over the dumbass. that would have been a severe violation of the minced agreements and the un security council resolution because i have no doubts that had they succeeded. the west would have turned a blind eye to these violations just like it has been doing. so for the past 8 years, and when care of proposed negotiations a few days since the operation, we immediately agreed. several rounds were held in person and betters. we were trying to understand the position of ukrainian colleagues while they were trying to achieve. so we made our position clear. after a few rounds and bellows, and on line, we scheduled a meeting and stumble. during that meeting, the ukrainian side finally provided its proposals in writing for the 1st time. the

document was signed by the head of the delegation. we studied their proposals, reporting it to the president and confirm to ukraine and colleagues that we were ready to have them as a starting point. and since those were just disjointed elements and not the proper drive, we've prepared one on its basis. and i can't stress this enough with that draft was based on the ukrainian proposals. then we forward it to our ukranian colleagues. but the next day we had another growth stage provocation in butcher. 3 peaceful days had passed after the russian army left the city. when bodies were found in the streets, and russia was accused of mass murder, you know, what happened next year? the west introduced another round of sanctions as if it knew what was going to happen. and ukraine said it had changed its approach and wanted to reformulate the principles of the peace treaty. nevertheless, the contacts continued. as of today, the current draft is on the ukrainian side and no progress has been made. but as to who's ready for talk, the landscape is giving an entity. recently,

he's talking to somebody every day these days. so he's giving an interview and he said he was ready for talk. but only between him and post it. there is no point in talks on any of the level. he thought there shouldn't be any mediators. and only after ukraine regains control of its territory on the borders as of february, the 23rd. i guess i don't have to explain that this is just silly, but nobody can deny the west benefits from this irrational stubbornness. i've said before that the west is called to inflict a military defeat of russia. so the war has to go on. they need to arm ukrainian, nationalists, weapons, and ukraine, including those that can hit russian territory. president lensky is public. you requested such weapons. we have strongly warned the west against providing them. it is effectively waging a proxy war against russia using the hands for des moines of ukrainian near, not seizing, but long range weapons would drastically escalate the conflict. and i sincerely hope that the few reasonable people in the west understand that. yes, we're looking into negotiations right now, but it's already been advertised as some kind of break through step. the same goes

for the italian initiative. we haven't seen anything so far. we hear respect relations and the descriptions of this piece initiative, the surface in the media. but from what we've read, if that is the real deal, then i must say it's regrettable how little the author of this initiative understand about the subject or about the history of the problem. if what i saw was correct, then they talk about crimea and the dumbass being parts of ukraine as regions with broad autonomy, no serious politician. he wants to actually achieve progress on the issue and not just advertising self to his electra will propose something like that. the dumbass could have returned to ukraine a long time ago. if the ukranian governments but perishing kos ancillary skis, had complied with immense agreements and granted special status to these people. the people who refused to accept the coat all they wanted was to retain the russian language. also, this italian initiative he spoke about says that in addition to the reconciliation between rush from ukraine, if the media reports correctly, they also want to launch

a new helsinki process to ensure the security of everyone in europe. will funny, how a friends in rome suddenly remembered the helsinki process. now, when it's too late, because the helsinki process gave the world as well as our region, the euro, atlantic region, a number of very important things where you can renew, for example, the declaration signed at the highest level at the summits of the organization for security and cooperation in europe, specifically in assemble in 1999 and an astonished in 2010. these documents and trying the principle of indivisibility of security. they said that security can only be equal and indivisible. these documents contained the detailed formulation. every country has the right to choose its own alliances, but no country can choose its alliances or otherwise strengthen it security in a way that would undermine the security of any of the country. and the 3rd component of this formula, no country, no organization in the o. s. c complained to dominate security issues. anyone who is familiar with the situation in europe understands that the key components of this commitment and

being flagrantly violated by western countries. they believe they are reinforcing their own security by openly violating russia's rights to its own security. they insist that only nay to conclude the shots in this region and no one else. so we tried to make these noble political concepts into reality so that they don't just remain words on paper, followed by the signatures of americas in europe's presidents. but said that they can actually make a change in the world. so we put forward a suggestion of, let's turn this political commitment. the one i just told you about into an actual treaty. let's give it some legal power. back in 2009, we propose such a treaty to the nato countries. they said that they would not even consider discussing it. do you know why this is important? they said only nato can provide legal security guarantees than we say. but what about the a see if you will have your signatures head, don't you? they respond with, well, these are political promises slogans that so this is very telling as to how western politicians treat, that president signatures. but that wasn't our only attempt. we tried again later.

i gave you the 20092013 timeline. and then the qu happened in 2014, the minsk agreements in 2015 because all those years we kept saying, day colleagues, this will not happen well, because you are ignoring all legitimate interests. you're rudely saying no. when we're just asking you to consider all legitimate concerns and we were not talking about some regions, tens of thousands of kilometers away, we were discussing the situation at the russian border. imagine the hypocrisy, the odessa to the colonial mentality. i am allowed to do whatever, while you will do what i tell you, and we see this everywhere, not just in the treatment of our interests when they need to remember how in 1999 in the united states, suddenly decided that you could sloppy was a threat to american national security. 10000 kilometers away from the u. s. coast, and they just bombed it. they use the american who headed up the o. s. c mission at that time, william walker, he cried genocide after several bodies who discovered in rep chuck as it turned out

later, these were not civilians but militants. they dressed them as civilians and laid out their bodies. similar to how things are staged in boots at nick kit on april the 23rd this year. the same technique. and it works even when it's not too convincing . they don't need to convince anyone they bomb the yugoslavia. they recognized conservation dependence, breaking all our c principles. and then they said, this is how it's going to be. by the way, after the referendum in crimea, they said no cost of self determination is right. but crimea self determination is wrong in 2003, the us decided that another country, 10000 kilometers away, posted, threatened to america, iraq. they showed a vial with tooth powder, i think poor collin pow late to complain that he had been set up by his intelligence agencies. in several years later, tony blair admitted, yes, we made a mistake, but oh, well, what are you going to do? obviously by then there was nothing anyone could do the bomb, the country for millions of civilians were killed in iraq, territorial,

and he is still in jeopardy. and the country is facing numerous problems. serious ones like terrorism, for example, which wasn't a problem before the invasion. yes, iraq and libya had authoritarian governments but no terrace. these were not combat zones with conflicts rising all the time. hibler libby, as another example in 2011 obama said that america will be leading behind europe. spac, france, the most democratic country, an old europe, with its liberty, a gala tag frontend to take principle headed up the nature operation against the reggie and ended up destroying the whole country. and libya's having a really hard time getting back to normal. the french, of course, now trying to help they keep coming up with various initiatives, hold conferences, amount, selection dates, but nothing is working. they should have thoughts about libby as feature after the western to ferrets for the sake of the country security. i am not referring to this to say that if they are allowed to do it, why aren't we? this would be a simplification of a very complex issue. i'm just giving you examples of how the west thinks and

operates. they consider the whole world, their security, so therefore they should decide for the whole world. look at nato, when nato crew to our borders. they responded to all our concerns by saying, don't worry nato's a defensive alliance. it doesn't threaten your security. firstly, this is diplomatic insolence. we should be the ones to decide what is in the interest of our security, just like any of the country. and secondly, the north atlantic treaty organization was a defense alliance. when it had someone to defend itself from the route when the war, so packed and soviet union dissipated, the defense line dissipate as well. any military academy graduate will tell you that both that they maintain their military substance and continued to move the defense light, bringing it to a border. we've just covered in detail the results of this policy. in recent months, nato secretary general and other hawks like the u. k foreign minister of declared that nato should take on global obligations, nato must and show security in the pacific region. i guess it means that next time

nate has line of defense will move to the south china sea. and it's not just nato e. u. lead is also decided to play war, so you learn to lavonda line can now compete with the east tough diplomat, joseph burrell, in how hawkish this she also mentioned that the e should take responsibility for the security in the, in the pacific. the go, how are they going to do this? so they're talking about some e u army, of that nature will not let them have this army while the alliance exists. and it sounds like the alliance will not even be reformed. ali, on the contrary, it wants to turn into alliance with global dominance ambitions. this is a very dangerous path, and this plan will inevitably fail spicy ramble, but shortly. thank you very much. one important question left. our viewers want to know about syria. how is this situation going to affect crush us military presence their day when i heard him? saddam for roseville. our presence was requested by the legitimate president of the saran arab republic, the legitimate government of that country. and is completely in line with the

principles of the un charter. we are addressing the tasks set out by the security council in resolution to 254. we will continue to do so, and we will support the syrian leadership in its efforts to fully restore the territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic. because there are still military units of states that were never invited, that in the u. s. military, for example, which has occupied a large part of the eastern bank of the euphrates, is openly crating, cause i states directly encouraging separatism and exploiting the sentiments of a part of the kurdish population in iraq to that end. problems arise between the various entities that represent the iraqi and syrian cuts. naturally, all of this contributes to tensions in this part of the region which are tech is understandably getting involved as well. what we want to solve these problems exclusively on the basis of respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic, as we speak with the cause. we have channels of communication with all of them. and

we encourage them to look more closely at recent examples of how the united states promises things and how they keep those promises. ah, a spoke with with both both the models you need to do both got nothing new with a form already a

they need a with the personal number you have that with a tail. this alliance between the marcos is and did, the tear did somehow gets reflected throughout the next 6 years. this would even called from miscue was power sharing would even mean that perhaps it would be sorry

.