interests of the arab countries, and we take their security concerns seriously when you mo, they in town recognized threats to russia. security threats that the collective west has been engineering for decades. right on our borders, trying to use ukraine to contain russia and inflate serious damage on a concrete, las mr. o'clock. we do believe they are ready to continue with that policy. despite the western pressure, the anglo saxon aligns as we call it lug was douglas social. yet the anglo saxon alliance has infinite gloom and they show it daily. the west doesn't honor in subjugation is under the you and chance to respect the sovereign equality of states and abstained from interfering in their internal affairs idiom instead, will keep sending its ambassadors an emissaries, the arab nations, in every other capital of the well to bluntly blackmail and deliver ultimatums loosely, it also uses certain situations in its black mailing of it and directly threaten. so the party has the punishment. you're saying they will regret not joining the sanctions against russia. this is outright disrespect of sovereign nation, just the but by the reaction of the arab nations and most of the states in asia,

africa, and latin america. we see that they don't want to sacrifice their national pride and be lucky to their senior partners, because it only shows that the colonial states of mind and habits of our west and colleagues had never changed from the u. s. in europe is still thinking along those lines, you each in their own historical stylist, they think they can impose that will on others assume this isn't right, and it's deplorable for a bit goes against the historical process of forming a multi polar wild with several centers of economic growth, financial power, and political influence. this no doubt the india and china at the world's most fast growing economies with a lot of influence. just like brazil and other latin american countries. the colonial and repressed the potential of africa that lies in its immense amounts of natural resources. they are still repressing in the neo colonial ages. the has an end in yellow, so africa is raising his voice table. me, i am positive that the arab middle east is one of the pillars of the emerging multi polar welsh mcgiver in oh, shit, machine, russia, china, india,

and other nations have friendly relations. good. we see in the lines of those nations to oppose the u. s. blog guns when you go to this is the u. haul young's. we never founded alliances. little buddied up against anybody. good. we have an extensive and well established network of partner organizations years. so these are the structures created after the collapse of the soviet union. but the commonwealth of independent states, so the collective security treaty organization and the duration economic union true . there are also organizations that bring together plays across a great geopolitical landscape before such as the shanghai corporation organizations that there is currently established and is developing close to ties with the lea a loose. and the coupling of the eurasian integration projects with the chinese initiatives are like the belt and road initiative. the bully of the people's republic of china, and the e a even have signed the corresponding agreement issues. the coupling of integration processes include more and more territory eula, euros. aside from the e, a. e u, and the s c o. these organizations have also sy memorandums of mutual understanding

with the syrian and this is the so called great to eurasia projects. is that the array from partnership, the one connect, the whole continental real president potent spoke about at the russia as in summits 6 years ago. soon and this project is taking shape based on real processes on the ground. he has a purely eurasian athletic, many arab nations are interested in collaborating with the se, attribute wet rule of the, of the leading sub regions of all great continent representatives. the my do substances with positive alliances that don't seek rivalry with anybody of the coming a global trend to organism the membership of bricks proves in brazil, russia, india, china, and south africa are saudi friends and argentina expressed. similar interest in this organization will show you the foreign minister of argentina is declared, the nations intent to become a full member of briggs. the preparation for its next summit is underway, which will feature an outreach format. she'll put a dozen countries developing mostly participates in. you said the progress is that

the plan we know are western friends, have many phobias and complexes of a superiority and infallibility complex, for example. but they also paranoid because they see opposition and a threat to that dominance. in any process they don't control or not policy officers. it's time to get rid of such habits as a per slid near. would you say the recent rush to china join military exercises are indicative of sampling of the proposal in english. this is an extension of our partners, you would change to strength and security in the regional, russia and china hold regular military drugs and various of the exercises together . the goal is to enhance our anti terrorism coordination and strengthen our common borders as members of the shanghai corporation, organization, issues. russia and china have a long history of fruitful corporation in the area of defense. so close, good in the years now we've held regular exercises in the areas where we shad boyd is using where our security interests. evelyn. this reflects the responsibility and commitment with both russia and china to massive security. i get

a 6 on his key. the anglo saxon allies has shown 0 concern of all the problem of biological weapons. despite all the evidence revealed by russia. how can we make the world recognize the dangers of biological warfare? although if you read the press, especially in the russian speaking world, they talk about a historic moment. now the trasha area has exposed those slabs to the world, but more than the ocean. this is in direct violation with the biological and talks in weapons conventional under this convention for years we have advocates of the creation of a transparent and universal verification mechanism looks to them. in these efforts, we've been supported by all of the countries except the united states. suddenly, the proposed mechanism would allow all countries to verify that none of the policies to the convention or in violation of their obligations since 2001 for more than 20 years, the u. s. is vehemently oppose this initiative. we know today why they have adopted this position because all these years, they have been creating street fi, logical,

the board trees around the world, that there is an entire division of the pentagon or the defense threats reduction agency in charge of these operations as the lender in developing that network of military and biological bar trees, the pentagon is directed special attention to the former soviet union countries, and eurasia. in general. if you look at the available data on why such laboratories have been set up, you can see they've been established primarily along the border of the russian federation and in close proximity to the people's republic of china was initially we expected that the experiments conducted in these liberties and not exactly peaceful or innocent in nature, are you so then the russian armed forces along with it, then i sinned against malicious, discovered these labarte trees. him, are you close to the city, liberated as parts of the special militia operation of the americans who abandoned these the bart trees in haste before they arrive. little a truism which attempted to destroy all the documents in samples easy, but they couldn't wipe out all else at the will. the pathogen samples that survived, as well as documents founded will clearly demonstrate that the purpose of those

experiments whose military wallace use from these same documents. it became clear that there had dozens of similar labs across the crime. so we will work to ensure the festival of the evidence we've presented to the un security council is taken very seriously. as he pointed out, the overwhelming majority of developing countries do take it seriously. and secondly, this information lays the groundwork for concrete actions to be taken under the biological weapons conventionally of the united states. must clarify what exactly they were up to. and we will also investigate further reports that sets in other countries, namely, the ukraine. germany were involved in these experiments, specifically those conducted in the ukranian lattice of a thing, if it's not classified. where else to define laboratories like leads you close to russia. nuclear, you know, it's not a loop. there are similar labs in armenia who has exxon and in several central asian countries. we are working with these countries through bilateral channels. and as members of the collective security treaty organization, we have to address these issues you with such he every c,

c o country and other members of the c i as we have signed or in the process of signing memorandums on biological security, renewables under these memorandums countries agree to inform each other of their respective biological research programs. would you look naturally? this requires transparency below so we can make sure none of these programs have a military come engine seating. that's forbidden by the conventional so also these memorandums allow the site to visits each other's research facilities and examined the activities if that, by a lapse. in addition or been stated in the documents, that there must be no military representatives of any 3rd party. it's any of our biological facilities to lead award through crystal a coin to this in what way would these cancers benefit from hosting bio labs like these are some material gain maybe material needed near the military so you can so use firstly, the soviet union had a massive biological research program. when the ussr signed the biological and talks in weapons convention,

the program which is strictly of all its military components of speech. but the research itself was still valuable from a scientific stand mcwilliams of when the u. s. the saw collapse in 1991. we will remember what they tell country refinished. the very integrity of russia was at stake. we had no reserves to pay off our national debt, so our people didn't have the money to purchase even the basic every day, necessities you're pulling, our western partners quickly seize the moment as they say they offered their services in all aspects of life, growth penetrates in all areas of the newly independent countries, they sent their advises that consultants and now were reaping the results, but times have changed or q. these are no longer young and inexperienced. freshly independent republics of the of just woken up from the soviet dream book. this is all in the past. now you will, all the former soviet republics have grown strong gush established themselves as completely sovereign and independence that they can now decide for themselves which partners to choose in the international arena graphs you hello, we have agreements with them saying that the commitments they made back then as part of the c, i s the c s t o one,

the eurasian economic union upset these commitments must be julie respected by other countries that are interested in fostering relations with all the states as the former soviet union, over in the city and of course we engaged in discussions about the problems we will face back then during the formation of unused statewood move through various aidan season as we continue to exchange information about the risks associated with such seamless collaboration with foreign countries of insensitive varies reverse. in addition, naturally, biological research is one of those areas. and as i said, we now have an understanding that we share by security ideas, issues that directly affect public health and the environment are within the jurisdiction of the collective security treaty organizational system. so we will continue to work in a constructive manner in accordance with all these statutory dogs, one ah ah

ah, ah, need to come to the russian state full narrative. i've stayed as i'm phoning most landscape div, asking him the american house southland and meet within the 55 when. okay, so mine is 2000 speedy. when else about this, even though we will van in the european union the kremlin. yup. machines, the state on russia today, and split ortiz food now, given our video agency, roughly all band on you to send me to school with which indicative electricity with

ah, oh, well, it shows the wrong one. 0, just don't hold any world that you have to fill out. disdain becomes the advocate. an engagement. it was betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground. ah . 20 a year now ter, kenny tally are proposing some sort of a plan to bring bratia and key of back to the negotiation table. there's even a name for it already. their own plan is russia willing to engage in the negotiations that so far failed to produce any results while her logo has given.

we've talked about it many times before. our western colleagues simply decided to use zalinski and use all citizens of ukraine to the very last person to try and contain russia. they want to cause as much damage to russia as possible to try and defeat rush from the battlefield. and they're talking openly about this in washington in berlin, in london, especially in london, and in war. so of course, in warsaw that went so far as to propose to wipe out the entire russian world, comparing it to a cancerous chima on the body of mankind. for years rushes tried to make people listen. we've tried to explain so many times why nato expansion, eastwards and ukraine being pulled into nato. ern acceptable. they heard us, but they didn't listen. actually, all they had to do was make he crank, comply with its commitments. they failed to do that in 2014, when there was a coup d'etat and ukraine, despite the guarantees of the e. u. for years we've been calling on k of to fulfill its obligations. at one point,

the zalinski government publicly stated that they would never talk to these people, meaning the dumbass authorities and the west. they'll cover for that. even though they were required to talk to these people by the un security council resolution that approved the minsk agreements. then they said they would never carry out the minsk agreements, that they would rather die than grant these republics any special status. meanwhile, ukraine passed the series of laws banning the russian language and education and in the media. the use of the russian language was prohibited even in everyday situations. only the ukrainian language was recognized as the language of every day communication for ukrainians. let's not forget what zalinski said. if anyone feels russian, then they should feel free to go back to russia. he said that in september 2021, we heard all these humiliating anti russian racist statements. and we saw ukraine's near nazi policies which were becoming enshrined in ukrainian law. we tried to make the western nations the o. s. c, the council of europe and the relevant,

you embodied take notice, but there was no reaction. occasionally someone would say, well, yes, they have to comply with their internal obligations. polanski could not care less about his government's international obligations, or the constitution of ukraine, which expressly guarantees the rights of ukraine's russian speaking population. they spat from the constitution on all the international conventions and kept pushing through the anti russian laws. we've explained why we had to make committees, and our findings that the ukrainian armies positions during the special operation suggests that it was almost too late to commence it. on february, the 24th, they were planning to launch a so called plan b on march. the 8th, a large ukrainian force had been deployed on the line of contact by mid february was meant to launch in assault and take over the dumbass. that would have been a severe violation of the minced grievance and the un security council resolution because i have no doubts that had they succeeded. the westwood have turned a blind eye to these violations just like it has been doing. so for the past 8

years. and when care proposed negotiations a few days since the operation, we immediately agreed. several rounds were held in person and betters. we were trying to understand the position of ukrainian colleagues while they were trying to achieve. so we made our position clear. after a few rounds and bellows, and on line, we scheduled a meeting and it's time book. during that meeting, the ukrainian side finally provided its proposals in writing for the 1st time. the document was signed by the head of their delegation. we studied their proposals, reporting it to the president and confirm to ukraine and colleagues that we were ready to have them as a starting point. and since those were just disjointed elements and not a proper dr. we've prepared one on its basis and i can't stress this enough with that draft was based on the ukranian proposals. then we forward it to our ukranian colleagues. but the next day we had another growth stage provocation. and 3 peaceful days had passed after the russian army left the city. when bodies were found in the streets and russia was accused of mass murder. you know,

what happened next year? the west introduced another round of sanctions as if it knew what was going to happen. and ukraine said it had changed its approach and wanted to reformulate the principles of the peace treaty. nevertheless, the contacts continued as of today, the current draft is on the ukrainian side and no progress has been made. but as to who's ready for talks, the landscape is giving an interview recently. he's talking to somebody every day these days, so he's giving an interview and he said he was ready for talk, but only between him and post it. there is no point in talks on any of the level. he thought there shouldn't be any mediators. and only after ukraine regains control of its territory on the borders as of february, the 23rd. i guess i don't have to explain that this is just silly, but nobody can deny the west benefits from this irrational stubbornness. i've said before that the west is called to inflict a military defeat from russia. so the war has to go on. they need to arm ukrainian, nationalists, weapons, and ukraine, including those that can hit russian territory. presidency. lensky is public. you

requested such weapons. we've strongly warned the west against providing them. it is effectively waging the proxy war against russia using the hands bodies and minds of ukrainian near not seizing, but long range weapons would drastically escalate the conflict. and i sincerely hope that the few reasonable people in the west understand that yes, we're looking into negotiations right now, but it's already been advertised as some kind of break through step. the same goes for the italian initiative. we haven't seen anything so far. we have respect relations and the descriptions of this piece finished to the surface in the media. but from what we've read, if that is the real deal, then i must say it's regrettable how little the authors of this initiative understand about the subject or about the history of the problem. if what i saw was correct, then they talk about crimea and the dumbass being parts of ukraine as regions with broad autonomy, no serious politician. he wants to actually achieve progress on the issue and not just advertising self to his electra will propose something like that. the dumbass

could have returned to ukraine a long time ago if the ukrainian government's but portion coast answer landscape had complied with immense agreements and granted special status to these people. the people who refused to accept the code. all they wanted was to retain the russian language. also, this italian initiative you spoke about says that in addition to the reconciliation between rush from ukraine, if the media report correctly, they also want to launch a new helsinki process to ensure the security of everyone in europe. funny how our friends in rome suddenly remembered the helsinki process. now, when it's too late, because the helsinki price escaped the world as well as our region, the euro, atlantic region, a number of very important things. and as for example, the declaration signed to the highest level at the summits of the organization for security and cooperation in europe. specifically in assemble in 1999 and an astonished in 2010. these documents and shrine the principle of indivisibility of security. they said that security can only be equal and indivisible. these

documents contained the detailed formulation. every country has the right to choose its own alliances, but no country can choose its alliances or otherwise strengthen its security in a way that would undermine the security of any of the country. and the 3rd components of this formula, no country, no organization in the o. s. c complained to dominate security issues. anyone who is familiar with a situation in europe understands that the key components of this commitment of being flagrantly violated by western countries. they believe they are reinforcing their own security by openly violating russia's rights to its own security. they insist that only nay to conclude the shots in this region and no one else. so we tried to make these noble political concepts and to reality to they don't just remain words on paper, followed by the signatures of americas in europe's presidents. but said that they can actually make a change in the world. so we put forward a suggestion of, let's turn this political commitment. the one i just told you about into an actual treaty. let's give it some legal power. back in 2009, we propose such

a treaty to the nato countries. they said that they would not even consider discussing it. do you know why this is important? they said only nato can provide legal security guarantees than we say. but what about the os? see if you will have your signatures head, don't you? they respond with, well, these are political promises slogans that so this is very telling as to how western politicians treat, that president signatures. but that wasn't our only attempt. we tried again later. i gave you the 20092013 time up. and then the qu happened in 2014 the minced agreements in 2015 because all those years we kept saying they colleagues, this will not happen well, because you are ignoring all legitimate interests. you're rudely saying no. when we're just asking you to consider all legitimate concerns and we were not talking about some regions, tens of thousands of kilometers away, we were discussing the situation at the russian border. imagine the hypocrisy, the odessa to the colonial mentality. i am allowed to do whatever,

while you will do what i tell you, and we see this everywhere, not just in the treatments of our interests when they need to remember how in 1999 in the united states, suddenly decided that you just sloppy was a threat to american national security. 10000 kilometers away from the u. s. coast, and they just bombed it. they use the american who headed up the o. s. c mission at that time, william walker. he cried, genocide after several bodies who discovered in red check as it turned out later, these were not civilians but militants. they dressed them as civilians and laid out their bodies. similar to how things were staged in boots at nick care on april the 23rd. this year, the same technique and it works even when it's not too convincing. they don't need to convince anyone they bomb the yugoslavia. they recognize conservation dependence, breaking all our c principles. and then they said, this is how it's going to be. by the way, after the referendum in crimea, they said no cost of self determination is right. but crimea self determination is wrong. in 2003, the us decided that another country, 10000 kilometers away,

posted to america, iraq. they showed a file with powder. i think poor column pow late to complain that he had been set up by his intelligence agencies. in several years later, tony blair admitted, yes, we made a mistake, but oh, well, what are you going to do? obviously, by then there was nothing anyone could do. the bomb, the country for millions of civilians were killed in iraq, territorial intact is still in jeopardy. and the countries facing numerous problems, serious ones like terrorism, for example, which wasn't a problem before the invasion. yes, iraq and libya had authoritarian governments but no terrace. these were not combat zones with conflicts rising all the time. hibler libby, as another example in 2011 obama said that america will be leading behind europe. spac, france, the most democratic country in old europe, with its liberty, a gala tag, fraternity principle, had it up the nature operation against the reggie and ended up destroying the whole

country and libya's having a really hard time getting back to normal. the french of course, and now trying to help they keep coming up with various initiatives called conferences, amount selection dates, but nothing is working. they should have thoughts about libby as feature after the west interference for the sake of the country security. i am not referring to this to say that if they are allowed to do it, why aren't we? this would be a simplification of a very complex issue. i'm just giving you examples of how the west thinks and operates. they consider the whole world, their security, so therefore they should decide for the whole world. look at nato. when they took crew to up orders, they responded to all our concerns by saying, don't worry nato's a defensive alliance. it doesn't threaten your security. firstly, this is diplomatic insolence. we should be the ones to decide what is in the interest of our security, just like any of the country. and secondly, the north atlantic treaty organization was a defense alliance. when it had someone to defend itself from the route when the war, so packed and soviet union dissipated, the defense line dissipate as well. any military academy graduate will tell you

that both that they maintain their military substance and continued to move the defense light, bringing it to a border. we've just covered in detail the results of this policy. in recent months, nato secretary general and other hawks like the u. k foreign minister of declared that nato should take on global obligations, nato must, and shall security in the pacific region. i guess it means that next time nate has line of defense will move to the south china sea. and it's not just nato e. u. lead is also decided to play war. so you 1st lavonda line can now compete with the east tough diplomat, joseph barrel, in how hawkish this she also mentioned that the e should take responsibility for security in the, in the pacific. worships, give a go. how are they going to do it when they're talking about some e u army, but nature will not let them have this army while the alliance exists. and it sounds like the alliance will not even be reformed. aliya, on the contrary, it wants to turn into alliance with global dominance ambitions. this is a very dangerous path, and this plan will inevitably fail spicy ramble,

but shortly. thank you very much. one important question left. our viewers want to know about syria. how is this situation going to affect crush us military presence their day? when the hood am saddam for roseville? our presence was requested by the legitimate president of the syrian arab republic, the legitimate government of that country, and is completely in line with the principles of the un charter. we are addressing the tasks set out by the security council in resolution to 254. we will continue to do so, and we will support the syrian leadership in its efforts to fully restore the territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic. because there are still military units of states that were never invited, that in the u. s. military, for example, which has occupied a large part of the eastern bank of the euphrates, is openly crating cause i states directly encouraging separatism and exploiting the sentiments of a part of the kurdish population in iraq to their tenant. problems arise between

the various entities that represent the iraqi and syrian cuts. naturally, all of this contributes to tensions in this part of the region which are tech is understandably getting involved as well. what we want to solve these problems exclusively on the basis of respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the syrian, our republic. as we speak with the codes, we have channels of communication with all of them. and we encourage them to look more closely at recent examples of how the united states promises things and how they keep those promises. ah, in ah, a

or ah, he's described tale this alliance between the mar cuz isn't that the tears somehow gets reflected throughout the next 6 years. this, i would even called promiscuous power sharing. would even mean that perhaps it would be sorry, the terry did that we had run in 2028 with another mark was as a running mate. and then they will just switch. and this will have been for years in years simply because the dynasty part dale will solidify ah ah,

in with ah,

ah, heavy fighting continues in the village of nova mckayla cut in the people's republic with local official thing russian forces have now we gained control of 220 residential areas that as well. the west to continue fighting for as long as possible comes to rendering ukrainian soldiers. they say the situation differently giving interviews, they express hope that piece as best buy those. so just to, with ukrainians laid down your on that is time to when the school to return home. i really want to war 2 and soon.