and russian officials say that it is a battle for a new world order with mister president, do you see this as the final throws of american hedge money, or are we still far away from multiple a world believing that there are those who refer to this war as the end of the unipolar system and it was created as a result of the collapse of the soviet union. all this is an accurate and partially correct if we are referring to nato after the disappearance of the warsaw pact. or we view it from a political perspective and the dominance of western powers under the leadership of the united states at the head of the un security count like this. however, in reality, the unipolar system was created after the 2nd world war, when the bretton woods conference established a new monetary order that made the u. s. dollar the world reserve currency. today, what is more important than the military outcomes, or at least one is equally important. so as not to exaggerate the economic outcomes of this war, particularly the status of the dollar. if the dollar continues to govern the world economy, nothing will change regardless of the results of the warrior. the thing with the

dollar, and many people say that the united states is using the dollar to blackmail the world. and those who opposed in 100 view this western economic war against moscow. and can it be compared with the economic sanctions against syria versus using the dollar is not blackmail. it is robbery because after the 2nd world war, the americans pledged that the dollar would reflect the gold reserved. good. they hadn't the dollar to gold. at the beginning of the 1970, staring, the nixon administration, the united states decided to abandon the gold standard of separating the dollar from gold was consequently, it became a working piece of paper. but in the fact that the united states continue to trade around the world using this worthless piece of paper, and this is robbery and it applies to the whole world. recently, the u. s. raised interest rates and as a consequences, the value of all other currencies drop affecting the economically weaker countries above. yes, it is a tool for sanction. we'll see as long as the dollar is a mobile currency and can used to be settled in the us banks or what is called the

american federal reserve. if you are under the authority of this dollar, and therefore your future as a stage will my country or society as an economy is under the mercy of the united states. it is a central part of the sanction. without it, the dollar america would not be a super power at all. mister president, i also asked about the comparison between sanctions against moscow in the experience of damascus and disregard. what the stand is, this comparison valid? if you thought of him, you mean the sanctions, regardless of the dollar, of course is the same mentality, the mentality of her gemini colonialism and aggregate little. they still believe that the situation is as it was several decades ago. and that the west controls and everything the world. today, the world has changed and there is russia, china, and many other rising countries. yes, we are under sanction. but many of our basic needs are not bought from western countries. we have severed our relation that these countries don't have the same

mentality and this will lead to the same failure for every country can now, since your basic livelihood and growth requirements without american permission, more than this could be a positive message for russian citizens. but let's talk all some mr. president about the syrian citizens and all the economic challenges they face, the sanctions. the only reason for this crisis, the collapse of this year and pound the difficult living conditions and other challenges. bob, what are you to human? a lot of it and i don't know, not at all. and i have stated this publicly on the sanctions are part of the problem because they raise costs and slow the economic process. but there are other global reasons like cobra, 1900, for example, on the west is presenting a narrative that the current problems are a result of the human brain war and more precisely, a result of russian policy. the reality, however, is different. and some of the national challenges are due to internal economic plan and not only external factors. so it is important to distinguish between challenges arising as a result and sanctioned for as a result of plans or as

a result of the overall economic environment which could be due to policies of companies or habits, a citizen or these all impact the economic situation. both positively and negatively. part of it has to do with corruption to exactly the economy is affected by numerous factors, including management as well. let them stop a little with your plan for competing corruption. doing most countries in the state of war 10 to delay or how many for processing, one of which is fighting corruption level in syria. our view is different because of the war we need more than ever to combat corruption. this is for the simple reason that wars weekend state institution has shown when state institutions are weak, corruption becomes more widespread. this is a common unfortunate consequence open war in any countries and it is not unique is a serious problem. therefore, during such a times, you need to increase your efforts in combating corruption and this is what we are doing. but of course, there are obstacles. war itself is an obstacle. the weakness of state institutions as a result of the war is another obstacle,

as well as the administrative system that requires a lot of reform and is the most important factor in fighting corruption. so we are proceeding with this approach across all secretaries political, economic and administering. but due to our current circumstances, there is no guarantee that we will be able to achieve our ambitions, fully gender. this is true particularly that the syrian people have renewed, they trust you, mr. president, your campaign slogan of us hope in action, but in our tour of the country and when talking with syrians and start frustration because of the difficult conditions they're facing. but here we are. to what extent can this whole will be revived in syria? that is losing its oil resources because they're under control of other parties and we'll address this shortly as well as having to deal with other challenges. wheat, for example, what you have available to mr. president and i will get on the floor here 1st. what you are saying is correct, i suggested hope because there is frustration of my recognize because frustrates

and which led me to adopt the slogan. second, these words are not a slogan him. they are the title of a solution. i hope doesn't come from sitting around and waiting. it comes from our attempts to be proactive and productive. rather than do we have the necessary tools to be productive will be yes, of course we do up on otherwise the state would not have endure on medical care and syria is free despite the decline of services and education is free despite the decline on quality of education as a result of the circumstance, and that's a lot of subsidies are still available despite the di, grimacing, rate of miss thompson palazzo. all of these basic services are still available with no change in our policy, similarly or their new facilities and enterprises growing or emerging during this period of war. of course, there are, there are many people who love their country and are ready to take risks and invest in this current climate, which is not trusted suited for investment and what is required of the syrian citizens. how can they accommodate meeting their daily needs and are deteriorating, leaving conditions are con, i considered to be patriotic, dot the bottom up on the evidence that i live on a 100 well with,

if we agree that an increase in productivity is the best solution to improve living conditions and services that we must would identify what will the obstacles are and my main obstacle is electricity, and as such, our focus since 2021 has been to find solutions to the electricity shortage. which is a result of the sanction which we have been successful and it is safe to say that during the 2022 and we will witness and improvement in this field towards no doubt, it will have a positive impact on our production capability. hassan. so both the problem and the solution have been clearly identified. you know, all the we are moving and the right to reginald. we should not raise our expectations to high and believe that all our problems will be result. these are not at all. there will be an improvement and it will be gradual. well, we must be aware that there are circumstances that are not in our favorite level. there are attempts to undermine every step will take rewards development. we must will deal with each problem as it arises and continue to find just annabelle solution lockwood. this is all part of the war room and when i say there is home,

it means we have the tools. we'll have capabilities to face all cameras from external forces to undermine growth and serial had the, the i also like to political or for perhaps some talk about the constitutional committee. why didn't the not making progress in your opinion? was a lot of no, this is totally different and has nothing to do with the sanction or that if we're referring to the constitutional committee, then the requirement is to arrive at the constitution, but a constitutional that expresses the desires, the value of the aspirations and the culture of the syrian people are the one that is a middle ground between all the different segments and currents that exist in our society . this is the results we acquire that with. with them logically, we are talking about a dialogue between syria or what we might call a syrian syrian dialogue under the assumption that there are 2 partners with regard to the constitutional committee. we are also referring to 2 parties. first party was proposed by this theory and the governor. its members are neither diplomatic nor government employees,

but they do represent the views of the syrian government. the 2nd party is appointed by target. so the logical question is, how is it possible to have a syrian syrian dialogue when one party is syrian and the other party is turkey? so this is the problem that came, this is why we are not shaving anything because quite simply, the 1st part for us is the aspirations of monsieur in people. while the other party expresses the aspirations of the turkish government and who are 4030 except another letter mister president, let's talk about what the other parties are. those who say the destroyer and government just concerned that the constitutional committee will do something that interferes with their stories of the president. what do you say? this is not an issue. the syrian constitution does not express the views of the president or the government or the ruling party, or it expresses the unanimous views of the syrian people or anything agreed by the syrians as correctly. and any date that is created in any form should be in alignment with the new constitutional, this is fine and there cannot be stability that is at odds with the weight of the

shape. this is why whatever outcome is read by the constitutional committee now or later or under any other circumstances, must be put to a popular referendum. you will not be passed by the government. this is a definitive, it should reflect in their wishes and hands of the people either approve or reject the contribution to those consensus among syria. this might be the objective of the general issued which opened the door for the return of refugees and other reformation decisions. nevertheless, criticisms be offended by those who would cover them to charlotte on being in our will be treated as traders of the homeland said the b. and you know, there are laws in syria. we do not have what is commonly referred to as political prisoner. this term does not exist. there are national given us and we have to be careful to not can use political freedom with transgressing against the national, giving a csc to someone might say, why don't we give up our occupied territories to israel?

this is punishable by law, and it is a national issue and not a political one. the same principle applies to other things, like composing president wilson. you will, if there are many syrians and syria who do not agree with me on many public opposition to a person or a government is one thing transgressing against national give. and this is another, those who are the hose can do so share is no problem. and this does not affect me personally. this also apply to the kurdish horses mobile. the mobile, the kurdish issue is different if we look at it from a national perspective. the current conference to an ethnic city that has existed in syria throughout history for the majority of them are patriotic issues. however, there are some who are not the justice. there are also some arabs, non arabs who are also not patriotic and, you know, act as agents for others, especially americans. issue has nothing to do with the president of the war with political opposition with the issue here is the unity of the syrian homeland, the mobile, the notion of multiple necessities taking the form of canton. it's a war if adoration is the beginning of divisions,

whereas the syrian diversity within a framework of national unity agreement is enriching. and we viewed this positive level, an ethnic, religious, and sectarian diversity will fill in riches, syrian society would not be other way. however, when it is presented in the wrong framework, it becomes a courtesy and this is something we do not allow from office who do what i thought the door is open for dialogue with every one. with the exceptions of adult julio described as agents, particularly of the united state hannibal, sometimes we have to engage nick and roderick l at another. the less i'd like to focus on the courtesy of words, in particular dos that control, that boil wells and with americans who bore out, what are your views on this and what guards does damascus have in order to restore its acid enters teresa pena cut the how all the, the problem with any occupation of a country or any invasion is not the invasion itself, regardless of how big the army it is to view. the problem lies with the agents who support the invader model has. this is the issue and it exists in syria or not. there are forces acting under the authority of the american. yes. and on their

behalf against the unity of syrian society. and we're still not the normal reaction, which is what we're starting to see in those areas. like, eastern area is popular resistance since the vast majority of the population of do not accept these deviations and refuse to deal with the occupier. and this treason, this is started the conflict between these forces and below population. as long as there are people who act as agent by the occupier will remain strong usually. so 1st with these agents should be purged, they should be weakened timid, and then the occupier will automatically leave because popular resistance will increase again, delta dental of the solution. then in facing any invasion, particularly when you do not have the necessary military capability, so is popular resistance. ah, i look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people.

a robot must obey the orders given by human beings, except where such order that conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence at the point, obviously is to place trust rather than fear a job with artificial intelligence. real, somebody with a robot must protect its own existence with

pickering honda and we're not talking only about the american challenges for you also have the turkey which no longer hide ambition degree would describe as a said zone inside syrian territory. what are your plans to prevent that may come with that part? it is within the same framework. there is an invasion, there will be popular resistance. and the 1st incident is, of course the syrian army is not deployed and all the syrian territory, but in the areas where it is deployed in the matter when conditions allow for direct military confrontation. we will not hesitate. well, this was the case 2 and a half years ago when there was a clash between syrian and turkish army. kind of the syrian army destroyed some turtle heart that had moved into syria and territory all over the same will happen again as much as the military capabilities will allow us to click on a call. and what about, what is your vision for the situation there? like any occupied territory of the subject to the syrian military and political plans for liberation of the whole, there is no doubt about any land occupied by the turkish or by the terrorists who

will be liberated in fine models. find this and with the exist. well, the problem i filed there are those for talking over construction. are there any urgent lands in that regard? others have expressed their willing board. they're also going to mr. president who made the link between this phone and your visit to united your american darby, who should have got a bottle. but there are companies from various early days and not the states themselves which have expressed a desire to take part. if we take into account the extreme pressure applied by the west through sanctions, on any accountability that might investigative area, we recognize that the process will be slow and risky for many of them. nevertheless, there are those that are preparing to invest in syria in ways which circumvent the sanctions. if we want to talk about reconstruction in the broad sense, i cannot say that the current political, economic, or security situation allows or large scale reconstruction will never the less, a process of reconstruction have started with

a limited loss. this is partly through investors and companies or individuals were rebuilding their facilities and partly throughout the state. so halford in rebuilding the art around kind of the core of economic life in some of the big city . and i'd like to stop a little with you on the diving in serious returns to this large game as a crime. how do you yourself see it it out of my ok. so i don't know how a large aid is defined, what the word rhetoric means because we never left syria has remained in place with the same positions and the same conditions dealing with them in its own way. and according to its principles and perspective available, i would like to say that in their essence, syrian arab relations have not changed much during the war. sarab states have maintained their relations with us and stood with us for them to do it. even those that were not true, the diplomatic mission is yes, even those that went through their diplomatic mission was changed their relationship and capital. was it a feeling us here in, despite not being able to do anything,

other position is the same as formal changes happening in this relationship. as a result of the change in work stances, whether range and all or any other matter that i cannot go on their behalf. whenever i do not believe there is a great change in the big change that is happening in terms of form could be left on demand. have any grudge against the countries which ended her during a crisis. one of the 1st of all, to grudges proof of witness. secondly, begrudging doesn't lead anywhere, but it does not create any positive results, especially in relations with countries. thirdly, we have to distinguish between policy errors are made by holidays and the people in the we seek arab arab relations, which means relations between and in this case, there are no grudge unless you mean fourthly, we know that our countries have their own circumstance level, but we are able to say no on many issues. we have many era for countries are unable to do the same. it has not a justification, but it is

a fate are compelling when we have to deal with laming and complaining does not achieve results. often more than a letter in the near future, the arab summit will be hosted by a jury and many people are talking by you and, and has done many other any steps in this regard. and that was the problem. a corner was perhaps the only wait is some it has is the fact that it is held. and jerry, oh this is a fact. i am not being diplomatic. custodial missouri is relations with l. g area under all circumstances. independence from france in the early 900, whatever have been consistent. there is something solid between the 2 peoples, maybe because the history is similar despite the different a period of a shot. if we address the arab league regardless of the algeria, some of the question is not a serious return or non return. and the word return is wrong, because syria is still in the membership was suspended on syria. did not of the issue is what will the arab please do in the future regardless of whether sir is in the league or not? yes or will it, it should have any,

if it's out ration of the arab citizen and why do not believe that it has achieved anything throughout that 3 decades. and certainly during the last year that there was a cover for the aggression against libya, against syria and every other aggression with washington is. will it be able to make this policy or not the arab lea continues with mr. can not be and will change in the end of our bill. dates are subjected to external pressure on all areas. as long as this case, the results will be the same and it is negative ultima. and then therefore areas return with a termination of this, and that is something a form of it might have some benefits, but we don't count on them pseudo. it was allowed natalia was what he considered the stamps taken recently, including your job adobe. and it was a talk with one of the many is going to adap and jr and andrew. my name is talia. come

a little equity. i will be happy to visit any arab country. this is for sure, but it cannot happen without an invitation for it is normal and to think of visiting our countries. because despite the utterly or state of the world that we have to limit the damage and avoid more declining the dialogue with arab countries and arabic. visuals is essentially a portion sheila said here we might point out something very important. and i may say that in return to normal relations with the era through the relationship, iran will not be perfect as long as the relations between damascus continue. period balance is relations with iran on the water and, and let me see what are the relations returned on the other end of the in the 1st serious relations with any country are not subject to discussion with anyone. no one decides for syria with only middle can and cannot have relation that no one decides for us, nor do we decide for anyone else. for this issue is not

a subject for discussion and is not even on the table than when it was raised to us when we don't reject it right away. this is 1st funny. secondly, many countries that used to raise this issue in the past. we have not done so for years because they themselves are engaged with iran and this is a contradiction. thirdly, iran is an important country. if we want to talk about debility in the middle ages, we need to relations with all these countries. but if we want to talk about balance between relations, the principal is wrong model. there was room when all the and let the particular leader damascus has achieved it for many years that him exactly, but not based on the idea of that was because balance implies and there are contradictory parties that we need to balance between. we do not live this way and we believe that all these comments such as your relation and i'd rather and good my legal currently there is dialogue for julian, the call to data and the ran and i thought i might receive the asian during normal

relations between re odd on what was on the line. of course, the basic logic implies that if there is a disagreement hardy, you have good relations, which is only normal for you to play the role immediate individual and the collective of all countries in the region. whenever we the normal relation of all the most and so we are unable to play this role. lot of cattle probably hadn't been normal relations or in their station on the way to the number of arab capital with israel. how do you get fold in their realization in relation between the countries in israel and there have been room, is that having to go to the effect that the masters will normalize them? the commission during may also go on. be sure that this happens and you can, if the 1st term is rolling in syria, we have rejected the term of normalization since the beginning of the piece process in the name. and because normalization as a german lies a normal relation and

a normal relationship, she smoothly like water without obstacles economical, worst, or artificial data for the term normalization, however, is artificial, and in that it aims at pushing herbs words. you can essentially israel in return for nothing, but this is the object in syria. the term is normal relations and this is linked to a peace process which is linked to the return up, right? and so this is definitive. on the other hand, we're against the relationship with israel, regardless of whether we refer to it as normalization or anything else. this has been the case from the onset of this process started with 1970. and today our position remains the same called the we do not agree with any such a process and believe that all the processes had damaged are some of the your call or let alone the palestinian. in fact, the, however, the biggest, the law and this lo agreeable, which granted all the candidates to israel by the owner of palestine of his halls damn. and consequently providing

a case in the world not normalize. relations will make pleasure with history and all what you like. it doesn't matter because the owner of the cause has abandoned us. so we are against normalization because of the fact that syria will never change the position as long as there is an occupied liability. which is the goal was that when the goal is restored, we can talk when and this does not come in the framework normalization. but rather in terms of having the normal relations between what any 2 studies loaded or who shop. okay for your hunted shop. now the last one while we're talking is really shelling containers and went targets the last of which was in the surrounding of damascus airport. i would like to hear your comments on that value from either the one. this is a different issue, although it ultimately leads to the same subject which is pushing syria towards making the concession values. railey interference at the beginning was linked directly to when the terrorists collapsed and syria because the terrorist for us is the israeli army, the how bite with a syrian or other identity. yeah, maybe so when the terror is over yan to retreat and they're more al collapsed,

the israeli intervention was necessary to raise their morale and to re mobilize. and that would what israel is doing now comes within this framework and nothing out you list yadda. i went ahead and other than the last question with which i'd like to have louis with your excellencies. they imagine that the west projects about president bashar assad. they said that the president stands against his people and it gains 3 to not an international power set to day after about a year of your being elected by the syrian people and oppose it to the tone. as i said in the arab and western habit, tells me, well, let me st in their national capital one that has the image changed or at the recap, held that i get at the ssl benefits in terms of the general public. yes, it has changed not because we've been able to address the west using a different language or because of different people. if abilities were that. but rather because the big lie that western officials used in the beginning did. and the unlimited exaggeration that put them in a difficult positional could. they climb the too far up the tree was you and didn't

know how to come back valley. and what if we follow the official channels of the major media outlets in the west, they'll continue to spread these lies and that have close political affiliation loca. we noticed that many of the comment was written by their own said a single it show that they no longer believe this narrative. what if we want to address that is supposed to revolution? what is this revolution that it is continued for 11 years with the support from the longest and richest countries in the world? a revolution that supposedly represents the wish of the people against the state. yet the state has not follow. how does the state consist of superman dosher? this lie is not convinced law. no revolution would tell you that for this length of his highland, there is in addition to many other lies that their citizens have under hover on the passing them is hydro? yes, so yes, i can say that the picture has changed, but well, this does not mean that people living in the west let him know what is going on at the club. they know there is a big lie and they do not necessarily know the big truth in our region kaffir, waiting to know that it is no doubt about that. but we thank you very much. your

excellency president bashar asada syria and thanks to arab juris. good bye. ah. oh no one else seemed wrong when oh, please, just don't hold me, you will have to. she bowed. disdain become the advocate, an engagement equals betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart, we choose to look for common ground because of the conflict in ukraine, europe and russia are going there different ways and like a divorce, separation is full of anguish and finger pointing. the biggest loser of all in this, of course, is europe. washington couldn't be more, please. it's a gemini is being sealed

a mouse another. why. why do you easy while for ah. yeah. when you when slide yes, south. yeah. thrashing us out with a new dock garza. it's an orchard done for me at that. i'll pull up my pizza is emma? yeah. full of video from she'll let me just kim's room. sure thought video a yes my thought or jane in that it again the audio fortune pretty up my be a lot about this more than just financial. ah

ah, he's friends, army shells the center of don't yet city damaging a residential building and hitting a street name and they put a situation office rushes, foreign minister criticizes potent precedent for what he calls an attempt to assimilate ukrainian territory with sergei lap. i'm also saying that european different amounts, so not to speaking to negate with russia, african countries back russia in opposing a western unit. pola well does. according to some of the architects of moscow foreign policy, you can pull the chip who's given an exclusive interview. most african countries share rushing approaches.