[000:00:00;00] the who's in turkey agrees to admit finland and sweden to nato, lifting its opposition and to green lighting of the blocks enlargement something russia considers a red line. and i'm counting on you to finally realize how ridiculous you look like when you just go with the queen. in propaganda, brush lashes out at western colleagues during the un security council meeting convened to discuss what she claims to be moscow's deliberate attack on a shopping mall in ukraine's to find video evidence to the contract and with oil prices. it continuing to spite us officials quietly visit venezuela,

despite previously declaring the country threat to us national security. the news broadcasting live direct from our studios in moscow. this is our international. i'm john thomas certainly got to have you are now a huge development in further nato enlargement with turkey agreeing to lift opposition to sweden and finland joining the alliance. the 3 countries leaders signed a trilateral deal in which turkey green lights the admission in return for assurances finland and sweden will stop support for kurdish forces that are correct considered to be terrorists, the nato chief march. the break through as a big step to further confine russia, and he didn't miss the chance to poke moscow all prison today is getting more neutral on these borders. so what he gets is the opposite or what he actually demanded, and others to naples,

to cross it floors. we are domestic and naval stores. are they disposal of course, wrestle, waiting for the reaction from russia. what's interesting about this is it means that we are likely to see a further increasing of need to moving eastwards. it's something that is done since 1949. if you look at the map pair, you'll see how it's been expanding, particularly during the post cold war area where it ended up allowing countries to join, which saw that colon in grad, the enclave of russia. that was surrounded then by nato countries. then steadily moving up to the baltic nations, which meant that it was right at russia's order. this idea that finn and in particular could now join nato would mean that some 1300 kilometers of board that finn and shares with russia would mean that essentially nato is absolutely on russia's doorstep. there is no, nothing to question about in regards to this. moscow's consistently said it sees

this as being a red line. it sees this has been an aggressive move, and it's certainly likely that we will get something to that tune coming from the kremlin later today. now it really does sound when you hear the nature sexy general talk that as if they kind of egging on the crime, the new look what we're doing. we are saying whoever wants to join us can join us and we will do just that. so that is likely to provoke some reaction to and russia is not the only one that has concern about this continued expansion of nato china to as it concerns china based close attention to nature's adjustment to his strategic concept. and his deeper concerns about this policy is implications. we urged nato to learn his lessons and not to use the crisis in ukraine as an excuse to escalate worldwide confrontation or to create a new cold war. now, nato has consistently said this is about strengthening its alliance,

but some might be questioning at what cost is it doing that? now turkey has been the lynchpin here, right? they have had some serious demands on this. they wanted to make sure that they are well for one of their, against certain groups the kurdish parties mainly who they considered terrorists. who are these groups and why is tricky so adamant against them? turkey has made a huge you turn when it comes to allowing finland and sweden to join the nato alliance. we've heard, for the last few months from president erred one of turkey, that this will not happen, that they were not happy about sweden and finland for many issues, particularly over these groups that turkey sees as being terror groups. now as part of this memorandum, this has been signed by the 3 countries, sweden and finland say that they repeat that they recognize the p k. k as being a terrorist organization. this is a kurdish group that has been fighting for independence in the southeast of turkey . for the last few decades,

they've also said that they will not be supporting the y p g in the p y d in future . then this is interesting because these are kurdish groups that normally operate in the north of syria. that of course, tensions in the past between the u. s. franks and turkey because turkeys alleged that the us and france said not just only supported them with trading, but of also given the weapons. so that's an interesting development and sweden and finland have said that they're now going to re look at any requests for extradition of groups that turkey sees as being terrorist individuals or aligned with those groups. and what a really going to get from this is that turkey is pretty much got everything. it said that it wanted over the last few months at kurdish groups are properly feeling pretty betrayed at by this signature of this miranda, particularly by turkey. this b r. i s wheaton, which has been accused of sort of aiding it in the last at the final plan hasn't been laid out yet. of course,

we'll get that all the summit and we are waiting for that reaction from russia. but what's really interesting is that for the past few months, nato's consistently said that what it wants to do is to keep a lid on the ukraine crisis, the war in ukraine, making sure that it doesn't spill over from its borders. russia's me see this as being the complete opposite of that by now essentially green lighting or the accession of finland and sweden. really, i spoke to ken stone from the hamilton coalition to stop the war movement. who believes that nato enlargement brings us closer to the unthinkable. i expect that russia, we'll continue to say, what has been saying all along that nato should rollback its expansion towards russia. and we have to understand it from the russian point of view. and from our point of view, even in here in canada, nato is an aggressive military alliance. and nato is responsible for dismembering

the yugoslavian federation. nato is responsible for 20 years of horrible war in afghanistan. it's responsible for the destruction of libya and it's turning it into a failed state. so it becomes, it brings us closer and closer to a, to the unthinkable. because nato has a 1st strike policy. it has a nuclear policy. and it says in the process of planting missile systems, aggressive missile systems and armaments in countries in eastern europe, which threatened russia and the russians know that's the game plan as we have seen in ukraine, is to turn all these countries into nato countries. with the intention of bringing nato right up to the russian border and doing to russia what it did to the yugoslavian federation. meanwhile, mine the yellow sea to force at china into negotiations. that is the suggestion of

a u. s. navy commander. if it comes to conflict with beijing more on the war of words between the 2 rivals later on in the program, let's go to the latest on the ukraine conflict. a child has been killed and the 3 people entered in ukrainian forces shelling of novia holes. but as, according to have some authorities who say that the fort touched you, missiles fired of them. the 3 were intercepted by russian air defenses. ukrainian forces are also reported to have shelled yasenya voted in be done yet people's republic. this, according to authorities, 10 grinder rockets were fired at the city and the village of novel by wood told the guy and got all of the city and its suburbs were also targeted. elsewhere in regards to the 30 se ukrainian forces open fire on the city of bianca, where several residential buildings and a power line were damaged. they also claim the chief has used the u. s. donated and

$142.00 high mars rocket system for the 1st time and tax on the city of bit of ask . meanwhile, heated debate of the un security council meeting, where western diplomats prefer to focus on what happened at a shopping mall on territory under ukrainian control and not focusing on done the scott. all that is the latest video of the aftermath firefighters sorting through the debris of the vert out mall, which ukrainian officials claim moscow targeting, leaving at least $800.00 people dead in turn, rushes defense ministry has denied aiming for the facility, things that instead struck a factory just meters away in which you frames military had been storing weapons that triggered an explosion which led to the fire in the mall. let's take a look at this map to better understand the position of the facilities. you can see that the shopping mall is just 70 meters from the treadmill factory where the

weapons were allegedly being stored. a local park is also near buying. and this cctv footage from that park shows the moment the air strikes hit that factory, which suggests russia did indeed target the factory and not the mall. and here is footage from the factory itself. you can see the debris of the destroyed building along with a crater, where the missile exploded on landing. the boss of the plant has said that there were no reports of any death or casualties. the russian representative to the un meeting has been trying to tell western colleagues what actually happened dishes would delineate the answer. shopping center was not affected by the strikes as it was some distance away. this can be seen on the surveillance video. hidden them all with me solves, would have destroyed it. video from ukraine. borders shows the goods inside the shopping center were not affected by blast. neighboring houses to the shopping

center were also not affected. the windows were not broken, which would have only been possible if the missile exploded at a considerable distance from the area. we have not talked to civilian infrastructure and they're not doing it now. so i'm counting on you to finally realize how ridiculous you look like when you just go with ukraine in propaganda. you just heard from the russian deputy ambassador poly janski's. he pointed out that there is fatigue in western countries including the united states, about the ongoing conflict in ukraine and its economic consequences. and he argues that there is just they continued garage and the saving news intended to justify the further supplying of weapons and funding to the ukranian government. that seems to have no qualms about sacrificing its people. now it's pointed out that these allegations about the shopping center that just don't add up fit in with the ghost story they get in with, with the allegations the snake island new sailors being massacre when they weren't actually killed. it fits him with

a whole pattern of deception before we heard from the russian deputy ambassador. we also heard from the ukrainian president himself who spoke over the video. he was given a platform by the representative about jania. he called for the and to find some mechanism through which they could declare russia to be a terrorist state and remove it from the security council. then we also heard from the representative of the united states who echoed and offered support for ukraine, and then made some other interesting remarks. this is what the u. s. representative said before the 15 member body that leads the united nations that russia is war of choice has led directly to the destruction of crowded malls, grocery stores, theaters hospitals, and schools, and the innocent civilians inside them and make no mistake. deliberate and indiscriminate attacks on civilians and civilian objects constitute war crimes. the united states supports all international investigations into these crimes,

including those being conducted by the i c, c, the u. n. and the o. s. c. now the support we just heard from the representative of the states before the united nations for the international criminal court is quite interesting as the united states is not actually a member of the i c. c. and furthermore, in 2020 us officials imposed sanctions against the international criminal court because it dared to investigate the crimes of us troops in afghanistan. so it's quite interesting to hear the usa offering support for the international criminal court. the representative of russia basically debunked a lot of the garage of deceptive information and pointed out that russia has supplied information to calendar the claims that are being bandied about by western media. regardless of that back western media ignores the documentation. russia provide, show it is not committing crimes against civilians. both cave and western powers

have dubbed the incident at the mall a war crime, despite russia's denial. that is a field in which western powers have had more on all than their fair share of controversy, or she's done quarter comments on one. according to moscow, it was the massive explosion caused by all that ammunition going off at the same time that made the nearby mall catch fire as well. on top of that, the ukrainian cities mayor is saying that the malls management for some reason decided it wasn't going to shut the place down. if the air raid alarms started to go off, neglecting their re dilutes is a crime which the trinity it armster has once again demonstrated the investigation has revealed that the administration of arms to had announced on the 23rd of june that the moon would no longer be closed during array to loots, if a high precision missile dealt that much damage to nearby infrastructure imagined the destruction that an artillery bombardment would have wrought, according to a previous conclusion by the international criminal court, russia should be well within its rights to bomb

a 70 meter radius around and the legend military target. why? while there's the case of antic, tova and loudon, markovich 2 former croatian generals who were acquitted of war crimes by the skin of their teeth. at 1st, these western backed military men were found guilty of indiscriminately bombing towns as part of an offensive that killed $116.00 civilians and displaced hundreds of thousands in 1995 in the middle of the yugoslav wars the hague. originally decided that bombarding beyond a 200 meter radius of a military target was outside the bounds of reasonable error. the chamber found that the shelling constituted an indiscriminate attack on these towns and an unlawful attack on civilians and civilian objects. it was only after they appealed the ruling that the hague determined that 200 meters was in fact too strict. and so the croatian generals were led off the hook despite the fact that they had ordered

the bombings of civilian populated areas up to 700 meters away from military targets. the appeals chamber unanimously found the child chamber erred in concluding that all artillery impact size located more than 200 meters from a target. dean's legitimate served as evidence of unlawful attacks. the trial chamber early in fighting. hillary attacks ordered by mister toby and mister markets were unlawful. so russia is being accused of a war cry after causing collateral damage 70 meters away from what it says was a military target, but western back to potential war criminals get away. scotch free for bombing civilians, 700 meters away. not only are the double standards, glaringly obvious here, but it also begs a couple of questions. why in the world would ukraine place military infrastructure that close to a shopping mall? and why was the mall allowed to be open in the 1st place unless the authorities were trying to use civilians as human shields?

washington could mine the yellow sea and pearl river delta to bring basing to the negotiating table in the event of a conflict with china. that's according to us navy commander victor. do know the united states must find a means of disputing chinese see control the u. s. in the pacific command should aggressively pursue offensive mining capabilities to use in the yellow sea and pearl river delta mining. these 2 key waterways, which strike at a known chinese vulnerability in a winning essay for a naval mine warfare contest. victor do no claims that money, the key economic regions of the yellow sea and pearl river delta would allow the u . s. by time and space for a counter attack that's in the event of beijing. launching a conflict through surprise and deception. however, many think such a tactic would do little but further infuriate china with which tensions have

recently grown due to disagreements on us military support for taiwan. and the rise of china and the developments in the asia pacific region are among the major issues being discussed at the ongoing nato summit, where australia, japan, new zealand and south korea are participating at the leader level. for the 1st time . earlier we discussed us china relations with former us marine bryan berlin, mac who stressed that any suggestion of violence against china by washington has to be seen as a sign of desperation. measure of desperation when the united states is talking about resorting to violence with nuclear armed china. it seems like they have run out of ideas. they don't have any other way of solving these problems. so resorting to violence, it's a very reckless and seems desperate alternative to a real solution, a real viable solution. this is a holdover of western imperialism that spend generations or in

a new era. they should be trying to readjust their societies to play, construct a role amongst all other nations and said they insist on imposing themselves upon all their nation. china has many, many ways to respond to the snow entirely economically shipped magically. i think the united states should not underestimate what china can do and response junior senior us find the clothes have traveled to venezuela in an effort to cb and low held in los angeles. however, with rebuild relations with the south, when the u. s. refused to reco longer. remember who won? why don't actually was won. why don't please take this message back prior to washington and i think sanctions against caracas,

venezuela was one of the us biggest oil suppliers. but since they're in position in 2019 imports from the country have almost declined to stagnation point. however, a 50 percent jump in oil prices and the worst inflation in the u. s. in years appears to be leading to a shift in is policy vice chair of the libertarian national committee in the u. s. ivan vall, roth thinks that the current crisis has forced us to realize that anti venezuela sanctions have not worked. i think there's 2 things. first, there's a sort of self created shortage over here. when you create sanctions or other countries, you end up punishing just normal people in those countries and you end up punishing yourself. oil sanctions are hurting americans as much as they're hurting anybody else. so 1st, this is literally punishing yourself for somebody else is bad at for somebody else's bad actions. but the 2nd thing is,

i think americans and even the american government is starting to realize that sanctions are unnecessary to prove. ready the utter failure of socialism, that as well has the largest confirmed oil reserves in the world and due to their just sheer incompetence has been struggling. the problem with putting sanctions on venezuela is it less people say it's not the socialism, but rather the sanctions. striking argentinian truckers furious at the price hikes on fuel have brought traffic in $1.00 of the areas to a standstill by blocking one of the city's major arteries. now the truckers considered a central workers just months ago have gone from a receiving a free fuel allowance to paying prices that have doubled in recent weeks. police, it tried to stop the drivers from entering the city center. so instead they brought relock to capitalists, highways authorities in 16 provinces, have chosen to ration of fuel to 20 leaders per vehicle,

claiming supplies are just non existent. ah, while european politicians continue to impose sanctions on russian energy. some western companies are scrambling to avoid the possibility of a shut down that comes after russia began to limit energy prices to germany and other european countries due to the restrictions r t contributor rachel marston, explains. europe is facing energy supply problems, but german chancellor off schultz and other european leaders are denouncing the same fossil fuels that you countries desperately need. primary motivation, the rejection of rush and gas, miserable to align if we do have to realize, of course, that the future does not lying gas. this is very particular for germany. and this is something that is going to have an impact on the use of fossil fuels. coal and

gas fargo, but german industry is sounding the alarm about a gas emergency, and it's economy minister is warning of industry shut down amid gas shortages. as of last week, the country is now in phase 2 of 3 of its emergency gas plan, meaning a high risk of gas shortages through the winter time. germany's federal regulator has said that the scenarios are not pretty and mean either to build gas at the end of winter, or already very difficult situations in autumn or winter. germany's b a s f one of the world's largest chemical producers that makes products found and things like tooth paste. cars and medicines relies on cheap russian gas to fuel $200.00 production plants. the largest integrated chemical complex in the world, executives are trying to avoid the possibility of a shut down to put it plainly, there is no short term solution to replace natural gas from russia. in the short and medium term

b a s f would still need gas. there really is no way around it. companies involved in production of paper, metal or wood, could also be hit by the energy crunch with shutdowns or downsizing of operations, raising questions about potential lasting impact on germany's job market. and manufacturing base companies will move production to where there is competitive pipeline gas. and this will not be in germany. you cannot correct 20 years of policy errors in 2 or 3 years. the german government has been scrambling to replace the russian supply, announcing back in march that cutter would fill the russian gas void in the short term. in the wake of economy minister robert habits visit to cutter to discuss the issue. but german officials have been tight lipped ever since. robert's hobbit announced that a guitar would provide gas in the shore turn to replace russian supplies. unfortunately, 3 months later, the german government cannot or do not want to say whether

a single cubic meter of gas will come from guitar in 2022. all of this has led to other european countries to treat the situation faced by europe sleeping economy like the canary in the coal mine in assessing their own vulnerabilities. it's great if individual member states are able to feel their guest or just before the 1st of november. but if other countries are not able to reach 80 percent, and especially big countries like germany, then you have to be aware that this will be a domino effect for the whole of europe. the c e o is a frances, 3 main energy companies have all called on french citizens who immediately and urgently reduce their energy consumption, evoking rationing, elsewhere in europe. they say that levels of natural gas are too limited to compensate for reduction of gas imports and go figure that the american defense sector. also risk blow back from this global energy market. deregulation fuel by anti russian sanction, the century aluminum plant in kentucky,

the largest smelter in the us employing some 628 workers, has announced the shut down of 9 to 12 months, giving employees just 3 days. notice all due to what the company calls, skyrocketing energy costs. the problem for the pentagon is that it's the largest producer of high purity aluminum in north america, the klein found an f. 16 fighter jags navy ships boeing 740 sevens and the international space station consequences of prioritizing wishful thinking. an ideology of a pragmatic economic reality are already starting to bite economic consultant and to educator. meda mustafah thinks that western countries will sooner or later return to russia energy as green plants cannot be realized too quickly. anyway, because countries cannot, for example, offered the same quantities of oil, all energy that is supplied by russia,

it will much explanations or dreams are present but cannot come to in one day. and one here in 10 years, know it will take a 50 years or 100 years as it should be in cooperation. and he, we, the other part of the world, the more expensive, the more people will push and the more people will not fear such increase. and because it have also another economic impact, like in the future, if you increase the commodities, i think like the whole lot of unemployment will take place all if you like. what's the point of crash matter before? so the, or later, the will come back to the normal and visit the russia energy and functions, which is very, very soon in my, in my, in my view or that doesn't for me this hour, i will be back in about 31 and a half minutes with another phone for next tuesday with

a search international. oh, i will. ah, it only one main thing is important for naziism, internationally speaking to that is that nations visits are allowed to do anything . are the master races. the reason the jewish head, germany is so dangerous,

is it the law, the sovereignty of all the country? or is business and business is good and that is the reality of what we're facing, which is fashion. ah hm. mm hm. with change a that's how with natalie, he spoke to study of columbia. you lose video mama will follow you use the la cruz