we are dejected, quanto in mozambique. i'm worried about my son and what the future will be like going under. everything is bad year net prices are getting higher. how are we going to stop it of in been little, i'm worried for the future. oh, most beek has never grown enough crops to feed herself. there is no capital investment from government, no commercial farming, and no foreign investment because of the political instability. the barren fields show that local supplies have been used up. add to that the drought at the last 2 years, and the result is starvation, hunger, and malnutrition. mostly because amongst the 10 poorest countries in africa, situated on the south eastern coast of africa, it's often ignored by the world. but the crisis here is very real and growing by the day policy a r t magoo to mozambique as how the world is looking this monday morning. i am peter scott's on the be back with more in 30, but do stay tuned for crossed or without seas pizza. lavelle coming up next

ah ah ah

ah ah lo and welcome to cross your all things considered. are the you and nato living in alternative realities, sanctions on russia or miss already western consumers in brussels, refuses to acknowledge your chant, replace russian energy imports any time. soon, on top of this, nato doubles down the strategy. it is only yielded disaster. are there any adults in the rural? ah, to discuss these issues and war, i'm joined by my guess. jordan said he, well, we in budapest, he's a part castro. the god will be bound on youtube and locals. and here in moscow we have to meet the bobbitt. she's a political analyst and editor. you know, it's me,

internet media spread, gentleman cross stock rolls in the back. that means you just want and i was just kicking off with george in budapest. it's been a somewhat, been a very exciting week. i would say george, i'm idling, was broken e nato circus because that's what it was. so they, a new strategy came out of nato, which you and i discussed the venue would quite leg didn't make a whole lot of sense to me. but one thing that's very clear is a g 7, e, you, nato, they are essentially one. now there is been a complete fusion, and nato appears to be taking the lead, which of course is the back door for the us to run all 3. and this is what i got from their new strategic concept, which has no original thinking and falls back on this gobbledygook. values are nonsense here, so it is a circus. it's, they're talking to themselves. they're not communicating. essentially what they

claimed on the longest projects ability to map back that is doubling down what is already fail your thoughts? oh, absolutely right. no summer, i mean they call it the new strategic concept. i mean there's nothing, nothing strategic, nothing conceptual about it. so since 1991, we know that nato had no purpose for existing associate, constantly inventing new reasons to exist as own. you know, we've had the humana, terry and intervention preventing massive processes that we have the war on terror . and then we've had all sorts of other things like women so, so this is now they've invented a new concept which is indefinite expansion. because if you keep expanding indefinitely, sooner or later, you are going to get into an awful lot of trouble with the move a lot of states with like you expanding into the neighborhood. and then of course,

that it sell becomes the reason for nato to go on the existing. so well the talk now is a civic. so even though pacific this is it that they can they use in the later domain. we don't exactly know. one thing in the pacific really means it's kind of a concept that they invented like western ball. you know, there's another thing that they're very preoccupied with. not really defining what the symbol is because i guess western both sounds a lot better. but what is it? well then now the, i mean it, it sounds like they want to persuade india to join nato against china, which a civic is last, really, the problem that here they do is create the enemy. and what does it know? it's moving into the enemy's neighborhood, provoking and inevitable reaction,

and then they don't. we look at how important we are whole global stability. so give me your thoughts here because again, we, the nato is a defensive alliance. but why alliances? defensive, why does it need to expand it as it expands and creates animosity in the areas that is expanding to witness your brain? deem your thoughts? oh, well, let me 1st, let's just remember how to lose the need leadership about this expansion about finland, sweden because then you members, you know that they're planning to become members, but the decision has been taken as usual sections. and remember how young a wooden wanted let. so need to get more of nato and we'll just

destroy the disagreements inside the gate. just tell you which disagreements. i mean, nato was nameless, you know, they can make a, even though we've been destroying it even longer. it's a you know, the result and, and the destruction of the country, you know, basically the civil war there. so tell me, where is this huge disagree? you know, mr. mr. orange just objected some of the new values or the european union, and he was demonized. if you read the western press, hungary, or must go by some very vicious, you know, almost alien for us, you know, reach out and everything that is good. if you are simply because these people are

just 2 or 3, you know, 2 or 3 points. it use these to well, so it is absolutely right. the naval is region amos and it expands and then it also says, oh, the enemy is so good about our disagreements that we should ask you. so you know that the latest, the latest idea is that there should be no consensus, you know, about military action, which i think is a very dangerous thing, because then they will be, will be they can, anyone who is not like in the states and all the pay so basically, you know, it's the same story is the same evolution. the germany made between 1940 is getting more and more authoritarian, more and more aggressive and destroying disagreements inside of it because they

don't around. and so it's interesting the point that out, and i think there is a difference here. george is that no we, we remember, you know, that, you know, we're not alliance, it's not directed against anyone. you all this nonsense. well now it is ok. they've taken the basket, russia, china, and this is what, this is what they want to galvanize the entire alliance around, which is, it's pretty bad. i mean, one of the things with these big compounds i've noticed is that this is an elite conversation that don't really see further down. you know, it's, it's, it's these people that they feel that they're the mandarins of the universe and that there are so very important. but i can tell you, looking in asian press, ok. you know, the, the g 7 needs, so what brussels makes it. so what i mean, they have an oversized sense of themselves on the world stage. and what, what many people say is that, you know,

they're isolating themselves by directly over there. i'll focus on russia and we heard last week now, johnny george. that's exactly right. and that's very interesting because during the, in the announcing the strategic process for several times a repeated every country has the right to determine its own future. i know some countries allow yeah, but the interesting thing is that everything that nato does is to coerce. so the countries, i mean, i spent all that time going around the world telling india, oh, you have to join us and demonizing and sanctioning russia, even though it has nothing whatever to do with the goes against your, your foreign policy goes against your national interest. goes against your tradition, but you have to join us and they were doing that even to china. know them during the g 7, the last statement, they say,

i have to join us. you have to start enabling russia. so here is a, yeah, everyone has to determine their own future except those who don't determine their future along a. so once again, it's like you have a right to join us. you don't have a right not to join us. so we always have the case with in bytes, a visit, and then a over our space. so with, so the, as a future. so that again, you know, the nature of which is we know we creating these enemies. and that's interesting is not the strategic concept about cooperation leg. yeah. that's exactly it. let me get a game on this. you know exactly where i want to go. you know,

you look at this strategic concept big i think was last, was in 2010 and we haven't been playing out on the european content right now. of course, reference the claim that one word of that to resolve and in that conflict, not one word. ok. so what is the, what is this the defensive military alliance all about. ok, they're not going to talk about peace in their own neighborhood. and of course, the argument has been made and i'll be, it's the argument that the russians have made is that at the very core of this topic is nate new expansion. no addressing that issue whatsoever. i had a ration, but also when legal says, i don't, i don't know just how it's old allies to live in again. so i mean, women decent security. i just want, you know, i think you discussed it with joe, you know, this is a nato seems to come on, you know,

a, well, if you're a woman, then you have to have your own military get. you are listed in the army army. can you for its own purposes, a nurse. so this is women, peace and security. this is the symbol. oh no. they just spreading democracy, i think is george and i, we were they, we did a long video on this on the gap, which i urge everyone to look at. i mean, we were trying to figure out why those 3 words worked together, maybe like it. so, i mean, the, in general, correct me if i'm wrong, there's something wrong with more than one. so like for women is united states,

you know, you know, affordable kid. but it is a lie, a people at the battle field. this is all very well women's rights, but they always forget about irrational. there's, you, people talk about this, right? you know, companies, but we do have affordable expenses here. and this is the main point. maybe this is just a, a, you mentioned that quickly here. i mean, this is one of the most irritating things in this document is the word values. give me 30 seconds, go to the break, but i think it's the actual document is 11 pages long and the word values comes up a 70 times. so everything is really about it's bad use memory specifies what these

values are, you know. so it's assume that they are, you know, you know, gall mother and apple pie and all, and all those things, i mean a dropping women and it's like, it's like, well it's very fluid. it values what we think at the time a company we're going to go to restore, break discussion, stay oh, ah, with

ah, welcome to cross not we're all phase are considered. i get a bill. this is the home addition to remind you. we're discussing some real. ah was go back to here in moscow demand, i guess what is it $803000000.00 more dollars that i'm losing out how much money is being well over 50 percent of what russian spent on defense a year. but it was a very, it's some interesting stories coming out about something that we've projected here is some of the high tech stuff that the u. s. and sending very expensive, a missile defense related to missile defense and whatnot. there are some reports that it's landing, other hands,

it's being sold on the black market. i knew this was going to happen if it isn't true back to we need more cooperation. but the stories are beginning to circulate. ok, so not only is the calm taking the ukraine not winding down and that's, that's a craven choice on the side of the west. and zalinski backers. but now we have but very sophisticated, expensive on military hardware, floating around in the 3rd parties. what could possibly go wrong, the month ahead? well, the most changes parker it is that the s russian troops bush with you korean troops away, you know, the distance from their russian speaking areas you know, that mega point us in the eastern countries such as don't. yeah, and, and do the song show song unfortunately, americans are supplying long distance wells which make it possible for the you

bringing on it to strike normally at the sieges. also just i, you know, on saturday the struck a russian seat, 5 people in the center, in the downtown builder. so in fact, these battles make this work more dangerous. you know, i have a friend who's you green leaf here. you know, he became a russian citizen, a and he's from here so. so he's family, they all a boy with a russian citizenship. when the russian ask him, ok, personal is probably going to become a russian. does your family wasn't? she said, yes. i said, my, why don't you? several were a middle so huge like household people sit on it like there should know this is not going to work for us. we want to full protection. i mean this, you know,

a situation. ok, so we want to be brought to rush because it means security. a resume is terrible. we're ready to put up with that for some time if there is whole but that, but we don't want to leave like the people in dos during these 8 years. when they were not rushing to just, they were born by the brain on this situation between the 2 fires is the worst. so these explains that rush of actions. and the problem with these american weapons is that they make these great zones, been russia and ukraine. the song, of course, the threat was high, must strike at the distance of $300.00 q, which is about 200 miles more than 2 miles. this is a huge distance and you're right. some of these levels do disappear. i change my american police, you know, in america, just look at your own newspaper. look at that 900001000. how

may you bring in with us for a year in iraq? you know, i mean, so see the bill, lord of war and that's when it's all about it. so great bill, george, this is something you talked about and you're probably one of the 1st actually the talk about it. is it? well, just to kind of tell us what dinner was saying, this good can't be any have measures at this point. it has to be a total inclusive deal and it will be dictated. 5 the russian side at this point. ok. because the most after it, you know, this kind of 5050 gray area, but no, that's not acceptable too much. it's not been too much, has been spent too many people have died too much, but this cannot happen again that and that's what the solution of this conflict is going to be a total solution, thoughts a total solution because whatever losses originally tension may have been on

february, the 24, which was essentially just to liberate a gas, and then you know, just leave it, leave it there. i don't think that's the solution now because the americans specially but also the british of the rest of the day. so they want to keep boring in ever more sophisticated and dangerous weapons. you've got to encourage zaleski and he's gang saddam fighting this war. so there's no point. roger can just say that we've done, we've achieved our objectives because i won't have it because as long as they keep loving these mist and you know what the deal is making. yeah. 1 on saturday they are they hit targets inside russia when they specifically promised the americans and the americans told the public, oh no, no the we have it on the one of the greatest. they are not going to target any

places in russia. i mean, we know that we're going to do this and we know that they go to target crimea. i mean, i'm already said that they go to target crimea a going to keep doing this, and the americans are going to another they going to keep doing this. and this is the way to bring russia down by essentially keeping this will going and humiliating and eventually. so right just aren't allowed a rather than pass this actually take over the rest of the country and remove the people from power, you know, whoever they bring somebody else in a maybe bringing back you know, which allow these people to say, oh it's, it's interesting to say that because the there was a western and i went to western pole of been conducted inside of your grade last few days. and i sent you 50 percent of the paintings when they're their own

government as well as russia be there. but when their own government for the fate of the fallen them, it's very interesting. i can remember places like responsible state crowns and all that say your grade is one of the world that your grades are completely, you know. and you know, i think that will have to be scrubbing some point because it's so embarrassing because of the problem so much with western coverage of your grade, even before the conflict that it's a very complicated and very fun united country. and we're seeing this here. i have called what's going on in ukraine, also a civil war, and i think a lot of people you've already alluded to it how people in different cities of ukraine, only ukrainian. but when something like this happens, they want a total solution. they don't want to have this kind of growing floor that ukraine has been sent to independence. go ahead and just for. and mary goes on the stand.

what's going all imagine that some kind of very american government bought in canada and it all the u. s. news in canada and french and watch them. you know, of course there will be a lot of people in canada. and so if there is a chance to become a us citizen, we'll look for that. because there is more freedom, you know, the same story with russian. christina, russian books right now in odessa, it is for you to give children russian education, which is why he became english education. educational english in your rates are rates. and this has been going on for 8 years and the late of the, these have been the one all well, 3rd years and you're absolutely right. all of the new spoke to asians or there.

well, i mean, the western family has been saying, oh, what is plans and with all the american vision, their idea was that there will be a good re local. i mean, the last part there will be agreement, one instructional that nothing, all the saw, the ukrainian army is resisting. right? that's true. but there is which russian army, so you could, there is no group, sometimes the keel russian official, you know, the ukrainian groups, special forces groups the ball cause, you know, usually there is, there is no the reward. why? because people want a lady to the, to the new or just are ready to start the war a, the people on the ground. that's one thing. but george,

president vine said, you know, when asked that, you know about high energy prices against me. and you know, and of course, you know what the western publics are going to have to suffer. and he says it is long it takes, well, i think that you know, that time frame all of the, all of the nato combat, i think it was back. it was ray mcgovern that's at 330 blind mice, which i think even it was a really good way to put it here. i don't think they have, they actually speak for people on the ground that have to pay such high energy prices. and i think they're all going to read the day for their bombastic emotional on expos. say when i go in completely disregarding the interest of their own people go ahead. yes, completely. and some of the other day they had the white house official for interviewed on c, n, n. and it was off this very question,

what price we were meant to pay a we had to pay, you know, whatever prices for the liberal liberal. well, no, no. so we, i mean, it doesn't matter. you don't have any food on the table. you don't have any gas tanks to get to work the live room order. and that's really, you know, yes, it is blotted out the true, which is that this isn't the least war is all of their goals. they use you great, very cynically. you know, essentially destroy russia now eventually destroy china and to dominate, well, they don't care about the one they are. they're, they're always the lead. this is a leading to disaster. you know, the germans a screening. you know, a, well, you know,

a moment ago you were, you was saying that you were going to basically caught them on a 2nd here. and i'll, and at this time i want to say to both you and you are, you are the people that want to bend the liberal world order. they don't know what a loaf of bread. they don't know what a leader of me, they don't know how much electricity they don't care because it doesn't affect them . that is the new liberal order. ok, in the protection at the expense of everyone else. that's the end of my speech and then to barbara a want to thank you for watching us here. oh, for

today i'm authorized and additional strong sanctioned foreign companies quitting russia. a licensing atm card. so blanton bangs disconnected from the international payment system. so she'll move happy, jermel donna and euro exchange rates follow up when i check up on a couple more stuff. so i would know what the committee met. that evoke missed the pillar from that, is the correct. can you see what i'm not sure. see a material that was put in russian business overcome this song. see near i bought it to the nazi to huddle. she instrument. she tells me. don't press voice bullshit . nasha productive notches, steel dash, a miracle. what i see, i put themselves there when you come, when you with a voting you got any of your mind or just read them out, but she's a no cost to just a group. when you, when you use in with all new person who is a school. so a delusion would go to a book, you know, the mutual clinicals with

a report to the fed, lisa job for months and months everywhere with the city. there are gigantic trenches, blood food, they take a lot of work, bought crew visit, the last ukranian stronghold and little john swift public. on the very day, russian and allied forces for control of the region. bomb supplies to ukraine are increasingly pairing for sale on the dock met aussie reaches out for one of the hotels is what weapons are available and social explosives. that's what the gym and chancellor has called rising energy price.